[Bug 1702878] Re: Cant add folders to Search in Gnome Control Center
Thanks for the information, I am using gnome-search-tool for my searches and it is pretty good, Gnome Files I didnt use much. As for configuring tracker I wasnt able to find any config files for it where I can tell it to avoid indexing contents of files, perhaps I will submit a bug/feature request with Gnome, I checked this: https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/Tracker/Documentation/Configuration But it didnt help and I think it refers to an old version of tracker. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1702878 Title: Cant add folders to Search in Gnome Control Center To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/1702878/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1702878] Re: Cant add folders to Search in Gnome Control Center
I noticed that Ubuntu does not have tracker-gui package in its archives, is GUI for tracker still maintained in any form? Where can I configure tracker not to index file contents, only file names? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1702878 Title: Cant add folders to Search in Gnome Control Center To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/1702878/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1702878] Re: Cant add folders to Search in Gnome Control Center
sudo apt install tracker helped and now the icon is no longer greyed out. I checked the bug you linked and I definitely think that search in new Ubuntu Session needs to be improved, Unity dash searched for all my files easily and they were always very quickly accessible, KDE does the same with Baloo indexing, everything is easily found in KDE menu search. That is the feature I miss the most from Unity on this new Gnome based session, that and minimize on click option for dock. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1702878 Title: Cant add folders to Search in Gnome Control Center To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/1702878/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1708608] Re: [Nvidia GTX970M] Can't log in using default nouveau drivers, system freezes
I installed latest beta 2 and this is no longer an issue, this bug can be closed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1708608 Title: [Nvidia GTX970M] Can't log in using default nouveau drivers, system freezes To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1708608/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1705157] Re: "Ubuntu" and "Ubuntu on Xorg" randomly start the same session (maybe Wayland maybe Xorg)
I have this problem as well, I installed a fresh daily image and I have Ubuntu and Ubuntu on X.org sessions, but when I choose Ubuntu which should work on Wayland there is no Wayland and X.org is running. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-session in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1705157 Title: "Ubuntu" and "Ubuntu on Xorg" randomly start the same session (maybe Wayland maybe Xorg) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-session/+bug/1705157/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1708608] Re: [Nvidia GTX970M] Can't log in using default nouveau drivers, system freezes
lspci 00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation Xeon E3-1200 v3/4th Gen Core Processor DRAM Controller (rev 06) 00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Xeon E3-1200 v3/4th Gen Core Processor PCI Express x16 Controller (rev 06) 00:14.0 USB controller: Intel Corporation 8 Series/C220 Series Chipset Family USB xHCI (rev 05) 00:16.0 Communication controller: Intel Corporation 8 Series/C220 Series Chipset Family MEI Controller #1 (rev 04) 00:1a.0 USB controller: Intel Corporation 8 Series/C220 Series Chipset Family USB EHCI #2 (rev 05) 00:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation 8 Series/C220 Series Chipset High Definition Audio Controller (rev 05) 00:1c.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 8 Series/C220 Series Chipset Family PCI Express Root Port #1 (rev d5) 00:1c.2 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 8 Series/C220 Series Chipset Family PCI Express Root Port #3 (rev d5) 00:1c.3 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 8 Series/C220 Series Chipset Family PCI Express Root Port #4 (rev d5) 00:1d.0 USB controller: Intel Corporation 8 Series/C220 Series Chipset Family USB EHCI #1 (rev 05) 00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corporation HM87 Express LPC Controller (rev 05) 00:1f.2 SATA controller: Intel Corporation 8 Series/C220 Series Chipset Family 6-port SATA Controller 1 [AHCI mode] (rev 05) 00:1f.3 SMBus: Intel Corporation 8 Series/C220 Series Chipset Family SMBus Controller (rev 05) 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation GM204M [GeForce GTX 970M] (rev a1) 01:00.1 Audio device: NVIDIA Corporation GM204 High Definition Audio Controller (rev a1) 3b:00.0 Network controller: Qualcomm Atheros QCA9565 / AR9565 Wireless Network Adapter (rev 01) 3c:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8111/8168/8411 PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet Controller (rev 10) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1708608 Title: [Nvidia GTX970M] Can't log in using default nouveau drivers, system freezes To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1708608/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1708608] Re: [Nvidia GTX970M] Can't log in using default nouveau drivers, system freezes
apport information ** Tags added: apport-collected ** Description changed: - I just installed daily iso and I cant login to Gnome at all, when I - enter my password after initial reboot the desktop hard locks and I must - turn off my laptop, I cant get into virtual consoles or anything. My - graphics card is Nvidia, there is no integrated Intel graphics card, - only dedicated Nvidia graphics card. Logging into X.org or Wayland - session makes no difference, both of them completely freeze the system. - How can I debug this? + I just installed daily iso and I cant login to Gnome at all, when I enter my password after initial reboot the desktop hard locks and I must turn off my laptop, I cant get into virtual consoles or anything. My graphics card is Nvidia, there is no integrated Intel graphics card, only dedicated Nvidia graphics card. Logging into X.org or Wayland session makes no difference, both of them completely freeze the system. How can I debug this? + --- + ApportVersion: 2.20.6-0ubuntu4 + Architecture: amd64 + CurrentDesktop: GNOME + DisplayManager: gdm3 + DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.10 + GsettingsChanges: org.gnome.desktop.interface gtk-im-module 'gtk-im-context-simple' + InstallationDate: Installed on 2017-08-03 (0 days ago) + InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 17.10 "Artful Aardvark" - Alpha amd64 (20170802) + NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_uvm nvidia_drm nvidia_modeset nvidia + Package: gnome-shell 3.24.3-0ubuntu1 + PackageArchitecture: amd64 + ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.11.0-10.15-generic 4.11.8 + Tags: artful + Uname: Linux 4.11.0-10-generic x86_64 + UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) + UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin plugdev sambashare sudo + _MarkForUpload: True ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1708608/+attachment/4926980/+files/Dependencies.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1708608 Title: [Nvidia GTX970M] Can't log in using default nouveau drivers, system freezes To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1708608/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1708608] ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1708608/+attachment/4926982/+files/ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1708608 Title: [Nvidia GTX970M] Can't log in using default nouveau drivers, system freezes To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1708608/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1708608] ProcEnviron.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "ProcEnviron.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1708608/+attachment/4926983/+files/ProcEnviron.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1708608 Title: [Nvidia GTX970M] Can't log in using default nouveau drivers, system freezes To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1708608/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1708608] JournalErrors.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "JournalErrors.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1708608/+attachment/4926981/+files/JournalErrors.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1708608 Title: [Nvidia GTX970M] Can't log in using default nouveau drivers, system freezes To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1708608/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1708608] Re: Cant login to any session in Ubuntu 17.10 (desktop hard locks)
With proprietary drivers I am able to log into Gnome without problems. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm3 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1708608 Title: Cant login to any session in Ubuntu 17.10 (desktop hard locks) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm3/+bug/1708608/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1708608] Re: Cant login to any session in Ubuntu 17.10 (desktop hard locks)
I managed to authorize the computer via my phone, but the command is still giving errors: ERROR: connecting to Launchpad failed: local variable browser_obj referenced before assignment etc. I will try installing Nvidia drivers now and report back. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm3 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1708608 Title: Cant login to any session in Ubuntu 17.10 (desktop hard locks) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm3/+bug/1708608/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1708608] Re: Cant login to any session in Ubuntu 17.10 (desktop hard locks)
Nvidia GTX970M. I will give it a try by entering the link via my phone, I dont have a different computer available at this location. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm3 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1708608 Title: Cant login to any session in Ubuntu 17.10 (desktop hard locks) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm3/+bug/1708608/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1708608] Re: Cant login to any session in Ubuntu 17.10 (desktop hard locks)
dpkg -l | nvidia Returns empty, I did lsmod and grep nouveau and Nouveau driver seems to be in use. I managed to connect via USB tethering from my phone, but apport-collect says I need to authorize a token via browser which I cant do from the console. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm3 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1708608 Title: Cant login to any session in Ubuntu 17.10 (desktop hard locks) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm3/+bug/1708608/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1708608] [NEW] Cant login to any session in Ubuntu 17.10 (desktop hard locks)
Public bug reported: I just installed daily iso and I cant login to Gnome at all, when I enter my password after initial reboot the desktop hard locks and I must turn off my laptop, I cant get into virtual consoles or anything. My graphics card is Nvidia, there is no integrated Intel graphics card, only dedicated Nvidia graphics card. Logging into X.org or Wayland session makes no difference, both of them completely freeze the system. How can I debug this? ** Affects: gdm3 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: artful -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm3 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1708608 Title: Cant login to any session in Ubuntu 17.10 (desktop hard locks) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm3/+bug/1708608/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1705369] Re: Ubuntu 17.10 boots to black screen when using Nvidia drivers (on a desktop with an Intel GPU)
I just installed daily iso and I cant login to Gnome at all, when I enter my password after initial reboot the desktop hard locks and I must turn off my laptop, I cant get into virtual consoles or anything. My graphics card is Nvidia, there is no integrated Intel graphics card, only dedicated Nvidia graphics card. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1705369 Title: Ubuntu 17.10 boots to black screen when using Nvidia drivers (on a desktop with an Intel GPU) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm3/+bug/1705369/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1702878] [NEW] Cant add folders to Search in Gnome Control Center
Public bug reported: When I go to Gnome Control Center-Search the bottom right gear is greyed out and I cant add any folders to Search. lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description:Ubuntu Artful Aardvark (development branch) Release:17.10 Codename: artful apt-cache policy gnome-control-center gnome-control-center: Installed: 1:3.24.2-0ubuntu4 Candidate: 1:3.24.2-0ubuntu4 Version table: *** 1:3.24.2-0ubuntu4 500 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu artful/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.10 Package: gnome-control-center 1:3.24.2-0ubuntu4 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.10.0-26.30-generic 4.10.17 Uname: Linux 4.10.0-26-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_uvm nvidia_drm nvidia_modeset nvidia ApportVersion: 2.20.5-0ubuntu5 Architecture: amd64 CurrentDesktop: GNOME Date: Fri Jul 7 12:36:34 2017 InstallationDate: Installed on 2017-06-17 (19 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 17.10 "Artful Aardvark" - Alpha amd64 (20170616) SourcePackage: gnome-control-center UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug artful -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1702878 Title: Cant add folders to Search in Gnome Control Center To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/1702878/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1698560] [NEW] gnome control center crashes on regional settings
Public bug reported: I installed Ubuntu 17.10 today and on my computer Gnome Control Center is crashing every time I open Regional Settings. All other settings can be opened without problems. lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description:Ubuntu Artful Aardvark (development branch) Release:17.10 Codename: artful apt-cache policy gnome-control-center gnome-control-center: Installed: 1:3.24.2-0ubuntu1 Candidate: 1:3.24.2-0ubuntu1 Version table: *** 1:3.24.2-0ubuntu1 500 500 http://hr.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu artful/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.10 Package: gnome-control-center 1:3.24.2-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.10.0-22.24-generic 4.10.15 Uname: Linux 4.10.0-22-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_uvm nvidia_drm nvidia_modeset nvidia ApportVersion: 2.20.5-0ubuntu4 Architecture: amd64 CurrentDesktop: GNOME Date: Sat Jun 17 19:24:59 2017 InstallationDate: Installed on 2017-06-17 (0 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 17.10 "Artful Aardvark" - Alpha amd64 (20170616) SourcePackage: gnome-control-center UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug artful -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1698560 Title: gnome control center crashes on regional settings To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/1698560/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1497678] Re: Ubuntu 15.10 beta is much slower to boot than 15.04
It must have just been a failed upgrade, because I did a clean slate install of 15.10 beta2 and now the boot time is identical as it was in 15.04, (20 seconds.) ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1497678 Title: Ubuntu 15.10 beta is much slower to boot than 15.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1497678/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1497678] [NEW] Ubuntu 15.10 beta is much slower to boot than 15.04
Public bug reported: I'm attaching a bootchart. I'm not sure if the initrd time is included in this too? Because that could be the source of the additional time. But subjectively it feels about twice as long to boot as 15.04 on the same system. This is an upgrade from 15.04 to 15.10. ** Affects: systemd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Attachment added: "bootchart-20150920-0530.svg" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1497678/+attachment/4469191/+files/bootchart-20150920-0530.svg -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1497678 Title: Ubuntu 15.10 beta is much slower to boot than 15.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1497678/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1409591] Re: Unity screensaver doesn't fade to black on fullscreen flash videos
This bug is still present on 15.04. Additionally, it isn't just fullscreen flash videos; full screen HTML5 videos in Firefox also go black with no fade. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-screensaver in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1409591 Title: Unity screensaver doesn't fade to black on fullscreen flash videos To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-screensaver/+bug/1409591/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1179180] Re: Impossible to open Empathy contact list window if already started with '-h' option
Bug still present in Vivid. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to empathy in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1179180 Title: Impossible to open Empathy contact list window if already started with '-h' option To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/empathy/+bug/1179180/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1075923] Re: nautilus hangs copying large directories from a samba share
1.18.1 is working great for me on Arch, thank you SO MUCH for patching this extremely annoying bug. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gvfs in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1075923 Title: nautilus hangs copying large directories from a samba share To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gvfs/+bug/1075923/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1075923] Re: nautilus hangs copying large directories from a samba share
Just got bit by this bug. I have two laptops running 13.04. The faster one with an Intel Core I5 is running x86, and the slower one is running amd64. (I prefer x86, but the slower laptop had a different bug that prevented me from using x86.) The fast laptop doesn't have any Nautilus / Samba / GVFS problems, but the slow laptop is completely broken for file transfers. I don't know if this has to do with the speed or if 32bit vs 64bit makes the difference. With regards to the workaround proposed in comment #171, thanks a lot for the tip, that version of GVFS solved the problem. However, the best way to implement the workaround is with APT pinning. To do this: 0. Add the Precise repos mentioned in comment #171 1. Create a file called gvfs-pin or whatever you want in /etc/apt/preferences.d 2. Edit /etc/apt/preferences/gvfs-pin as follows: Package: gvfs* Pin: release a=precise Pin-Priority: 999 3. sudo apt-get upgrade -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gvfs in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1075923 Title: nautilus hangs copying large directories from a samba share To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gvfs/+bug/1075923/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 952620] Re: Evolution freezes when attempting to compose email in html format
@josephillips: Does this mean it won't be fixed since Evolution is moving away from gtkhtml and towards webkit? So should we just wait for the webkit version (3.4, right?) to land in ubuntu? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evolution in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/952620 Title: Evolution freezes when attempting to compose email in html format To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution/+bug/952620/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 952620] Re: Evolution freezes when attempting to compose email in html format
This bug is still present in package 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 (on 64bit Precise Pangolin). It doesnt happen with other formatting options like putting the text in bold letters or adjusting the font, just the colors. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evolution in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/952620 Title: Evolution freezes when attempting to compose email in html format To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution/+bug/952620/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 918228] Re: Unable to access Trash, SMB shares, computer://, network:// etc. or automount
Thanks, I figured as much. I'll definitely contact ricotz, but I'd be very happy if anybody had an idea and could point me in the right direction as to where the problem might be. BTW, I've been wondering this a lot lately: is there a possibility to mark bugs directly to packages coming from a ppa? Or only by writing a mail to the ppa's owner? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gvfs in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/918228 Title: Unable to access Trash, SMB shares, computer://, network:// etc. or automount To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/918228/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 918228] [NEW] Unable to access Trash, SMB shares, computer://, network:// etc. or automount
Public bug reported: I'm running Ubuntu Oneiric 64 bit, with all -updates, -proposed, -backports, -extra etc sources and also the gnome3-team ppa as well as ricotz' gnome shell testing ppa enabled. I'm seeing the following problem: I am able to mount/unmount volumes from the GNOME Disk Utility just fine, but automounting the drives in Nautilus doesn't work. Neither does accessing any of the virtual drives like trash://, computer:// network:// or any smb shares. The graphical error message simply says action not supported (although all gvfs-related packages are installed). I'm figuring this has to have something to do with a gvfs error, but purging and reinstalling all gvfs- and nautilus-related packages didn't remedy the situation. Unfortunately, I can't find any gvfs-related logs to provide any error messages (where should I look?). Using nautilus via gdb doesn't show any errors. (Interestingly, mounting an external drive manually leads to it showing up in nautilus under the Computer category and not under Devices as before.) This is especially a pain in the ass because some programs like Deja Dup seem to rely on gvfs information, so even if I mount my external USB drive manually, Deja Dup will not recognize it and not start the backup. I think this bug started appearing after a recent update from ricotz' testing ppa, but I'm not sure and I'd rather not go through the arduous process of rolling back to the stock packages if there's any other way to fix this. Sorry I can't provide any more information right now. If you hint me in the right direction I can probably provide more details. ** Affects: gvfs (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gvfs in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/918228 Title: Unable to access Trash, SMB shares, computer://, network:// etc. or automount To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/918228/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 770663] Re: New keyring password keeps being reset
well, i'll try to be more specific. basically the procedure is the following: 1. changing the password for the login keyring 2. logout/login 3. entering the new password in the password prompt - wireless gets connected (as a sign that the password was correct) 4. however, similar to bug #745780 (and maybe due to the same cause), another prompt comes up saying that the password was wrong (while it must have been right because wifi connected). so i cancel the other prompt. 5a. after the next logout/login, no password prompt comes up. this is because the password has been reset to be the same as the session password. (i checked that several times because locking and unlocking the keyring in the password manager only works with the session password and not with the new one i entered). 5b. the password also gets reset if i don't logout/login again (i.e. stay in the same session after step 4), which i confirmed by just locking and trying to unlock the login keyring once more in the password manager, which only worked with the session password. so, bottom line, my thinking is that the password being reset has something to do with the other password prompt coming up as described in step 4. i don't know if it's the same cause as bug #745780 (i have no idea of the internal workings of the keyring manager) so i filed a new bug instead of just adding it to the description of that bug. any other things i should add? i couldn't find anything in .xsession- errors related to gnome-keyring (other than some window size issues). any other place i should look? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-keyring in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/770663 Title: New keyring password keeps being reset -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 770663] Re: New keyring password keeps being reset
** Changed in: gnome-keyring (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-keyring in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/770663 Title: New keyring password keeps being reset -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 770663] [NEW] New keyring password keeps being reset
*** This bug is a security vulnerability *** Public security bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-keyring On Natty Beta 2 (all updates as of today 4/26), I wanted to change the password for the login keyring in Seahorse so that it would be different from the user password. I entered my old password (identical to the user password) and then entered the new password twice. Then, to test it, I locked the keyring and unlocked it later with my new password. Everything worked as expected. Then, on restart, I was prompted, as expected, with a screen to unlock my keyring. I unlocked it with my new password and for example connecting to the wifi network worked automatically. But then, just like in bug #745780, after entering the new password, the prompt kept coming up. But as in the bug described, there seemed no harm in canceling the other prompts, so I did. However, this is where it got interesting (hence the reason for this bug report): upon rebooting again (or logging out and back in, for that matter), the password prompt didn't appear at all anymore. So to figure out what happened, I called up the keyring manager and found my login keyring already unlocked (without me entering the password - only the login password, but I had changed the keyring password to be something different). Locking and then trying to unlock it again, I was greeted with a prompt to enter the password, but my new password kept being rejected. But entering my old login password, the keyring was suddenly unlocked. So I went ahead and repeated the entire procedure of changing the password. As before, on the next login, I was able to unlock my keyring with the new password (plus the excess prompts to enter the password again). To check if this time everything was alright, I called up the keyring manager again and locked and tried to unlock my keyring. This time, it rejected my new password (after accepting it only moments before!), and again the old password worked. So it seems to me that the problem is the following: at some point, the new password for the login keyring gets reset to the user's password. I'm guessing it is related to the bug #745780 mentioned before, as this only happens after canceling the excess prompts after a new login, since on first login, the new password still works to unlock the keyring. But I filed a new bug because I'm not sure if there's not more to this problem. I'm not sure if I managed to explain myself correctly, it's a really weird problem, and I have no idea why the password would be reset. Anyhow, if I can contribute any more information, just let me know. (A limited workaround might be to create a new keyring and make it default and leave the login keyring empty. I'll try that tomorrow.) ** Affects: gnome-keyring (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Visibility changed to: Public ** Description changed: Binary package hint: gnome-keyring On Natty Beta 2 (all updates as of today 4/26), I wanted to change the password for the login keyring in Seahorse so that it would be different from the user password. I entered my old password (identical to the user password) and then entered the new password twice. Then, to test it, I locked the keyring and unlocked it later with my new password. Everything worked as expected. Then, on restart, I was prompted, as expected, with a screen to unlock my keyring. I unlocked it with my new password and for example connecting to the wifi network worked automatically. But then, just like - in a href=https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/745780;bug #745780/a, - after entering the new password, the prompt kept coming up. But as in - the bug described, there seemed no harm in canceling the other prompts, - so I did. + in bug #745780, after entering the new password, the prompt kept coming + up. But as in the bug described, there seemed no harm in canceling the + other prompts, so I did. However, this is where it got interesting (hence the reason for this bug report): upon rebooting again (or logging out and back in, for that matter), the password prompt didn't appear at all anymore. So to figure out what happened, I called up the keyring manager and found my login keyring already unlocked (without me entering the password - only the login password, but I had changed the keyring password to be something different). Locking and then trying to unlock it again, I was greeted with a prompt to enter the password, but my new password kept being rejected. But entering my old login password, the keyring was suddenly unlocked. So I went ahead and repeated the entire procedure of changing the password. As before, on the next login, I was able to unlock my keyring with the new password (plus the excess prompts to enter the password again). To check if this time everything was alright, I called up the keyring manager again and locked and tried to unlock my keyring. This time, it rejected my new
[Bug 763165] Re: gnome-display-properties in full screen and unity
@Chris, thanks for taking the time to look at this bug. I saw the bug you reported against gnome-control-center in Bugzilla, and you suggest there to move the label below the panel. Indeed, this was my original thoughts on how to easily fix this bug. But, upon further thinking about it, couldn't just use the monitors indicator applet on the panel to have on top of its icon an index number of the monitor (specifically, with the monochrome icons , such as in the unity default theme I think this would be informative and slick looking :-) ). I think this would be a more elegant solution which uses all of the good things that unity has to offer. Thanks again for looking into this. I wanted to try and give this little thing a shot myself, but just couldn't figure out where does one change in the position of a GTK widget (which is, for a 5 min glance at the code) what the top left label is. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/763165 Title: gnome-display-properties in full screen and unity -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 763085] [NEW] gnome-display-properties and unity. Adding “primary” display checkbox
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-control-center When working with two displays there is a question of which display is the primary. In the case of Unity the primary display is the screen on which the launcher appears for instance. This property can be set using xrandr, but the gnome-display-properties utility does not give a GUI way to set this. This should be addressed. This bug was also raised upstream (https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=588041), and was apparently solved for Gnome 3.0. With the Gnome 3.0 vs Unity thing going on, I think that a bug like this should be addressed within Unity as well (and as I understand cannot be resolved upstream). ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: gnome-control-center 1:2.32.1-0ubuntu13 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic 2.6.38.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic x86_64 Architecture: amd64 Date: Sat Apr 16 23:52:45 2011 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release amd64 (20100429) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_US:en PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: gnome-control-center UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-04-01 (15 days ago) ** Affects: gnome-control-center Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Affects: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug natty running-unity -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/763085 Title: gnome-display-properties and unity. Adding “primary” display checkbox -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 763085] Re: gnome-display-properties and unity. Adding “primary” display checkbox
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/763085 Title: gnome-display-properties and unity. Adding “primary” display checkbox -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 763085] Re: gnome-display-properties and unity. Adding “primary” display checkbox
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #588041 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=588041 ** Also affects: gnome-control-center via https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=588041 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/763085 Title: gnome-display-properties and unity. Adding “primary” display checkbox -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 763165] [NEW] gnome-display-properties in full screen and unity
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-control-center This bug has also been reported in Unity (https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/762871) Hi, there is a small very annoying bug when using unity and the gnome- display-properties utility (Monitor preferences). When you use the utility in full screen mode the name of the display appears on the top left corner which covers the close, minimize, maximize buttons on the panel. This is quite an unfortunate behavior. I know the neither unity settings nor the display settings are at fault, but they don't play well together. One should think of a different way (maybe transparent, or a few pixels below the panel) to display the screen name. I am attaching a screenshot to better visualize what I am describing. ** Affects: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/763165 Title: gnome-display-properties in full screen and unity -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 763165] Re: gnome-display-properties in full screen and unity
** Attachment added: gnome-display-properties window in fullscreen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/763165/+attachment/2050399/+files/gnome-display-properties-fullscreen.png ** Changed in: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete ** Changed in: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/763165 Title: gnome-display-properties in full screen and unity -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 754080] [NEW] package quadrapassel (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/gnome-games/quadrapassel/pixmaps/quadrapassel.svg', which is also in package branding
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-games When updating the package ubuntu-branding I got an error saying the it is trying to overwrite a file found in quadrapassel package. To try and fix this problem I removed the quadrapassel package. Ubuntu-branding installed successfully. Then I tried to reinstall quadrapassel and got this error. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: quadrapassel (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.41-generic 2.6.38.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic x86_64 AptOrdering: quadrapassel: Install quadrapassel: Configure Architecture: amd64 Date: Fri Apr 8 00:22:22 2011 DpkgTerminalLog: Unpacking quadrapassel (from .../quadrapassel_1%3a2.32.1-0ubuntu3_amd64.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/quadrapassel_1%3a2.32.1-0ubuntu3_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/share/gnome-games/quadrapassel/pixmaps/quadrapassel.svg', which is also in package branding-ubuntu 0.6 ErrorMessage: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/gnome-games/quadrapassel/pixmaps/quadrapassel.svg', which is also in package branding-ubuntu 0.6 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release amd64 (20100429) SourcePackage: gnome-games Title: package quadrapassel (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/gnome-games/quadrapassel/pixmaps/quadrapassel.svg', which is also in package branding-ubuntu 0.6 UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-04-01 (6 days ago) ** Affects: gnome-games (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-games in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/754080 Title: package quadrapassel (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/gnome- games/quadrapassel/pixmaps/quadrapassel.svg', which is also in package branding-ubuntu 0.6 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 754080] Re: package quadrapassel (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/gnome-games/quadrapassel/pixmaps/quadrapassel.svg', which is also in package branding-u
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-games in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/754080 Title: package quadrapassel (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/gnome- games/quadrapassel/pixmaps/quadrapassel.svg', which is also in package branding-ubuntu 0.6 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 549957] Re: Nautilus file search gives no results (but works as root)
same here. i never used tracker but the daemon was running. after killing tracker, i get results again. i'm still wondering why this never happened earlier because it seems to me like i'd seen tracker processes running in karmic as well without inhibiting the nautilus search... anyway, thanks for the hint, i can now work productively with nautilus again! -- Nautilus file search gives no results (but works as root) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/549957 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 549957] Re: Nautilus file search only works as root
i've tried your suggestion with a new user but it didn't help: i wasnt able to search my folders through nautilus with a clean profile either. i think i've isolated the error message: in both the old and the new profile, nautilus reports the following error in the xsession-errors file after trying to perform a search: ** (nautilus:1651): CRITICAL **: dbus_g_proxy_cancel_call: assertion `pending != NULL' failed this message doesnt occur when running nautilus as root. -- Nautilus file search only works as root https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/549957 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 549957] Re: Nautilus file search only works as root
*bump* -- Nautilus file search only works as root https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/549957 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 549957] Re: Nautilus file search only works as root
no, it doesn't. it's still impossible to do a search as a normal user, while the search as root works flawlessly. are there any pieces of information i can provide you with other than what i have already posted that could help you figure out what's going on? -- Nautilus file search only works as root https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/549957 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 549957] [NEW] Nautilus file search only works as root
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nautilus if i run nautilus as a normal user, the search feature does not work at all. no matter in which directory i am, the search engine does not find anything, it always has zero results. if i run nautilus as root, however, the search feature works just fine. so i'm guessing this must have something to do with permissions, but i don't really see how since it doesnt even work in my home directory... this bug appeared after i upgraded from karmic to lucid beta yesterday. i'm using version 2.29.92.1 of nautilus. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: nautilus 1:2.29.92.1-0ubuntu4 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-17.26-generic 2.6.32.10+drm33.1 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-17-generic i686 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Architecture: i386 Date: Sun Mar 28 00:29:24 2010 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/nautilus ProcEnviron: LANG=de_DE.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: nautilus ** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid -- Nautilus file search only works as root https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/549957 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 549957] Re: Nautilus file search only works as root
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42213433/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42213434/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42213435/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment added: XsessionErrors.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42213436/XsessionErrors.txt ** Attachment added: usr_lib_nautilus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42213437/usr_lib_nautilus.txt -- Nautilus file search only works as root https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/549957 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 513525] Re: If you read this text, your display server doesn't work properly.
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 423694 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/423694 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 504811 display server is broken -- If you read this text, your display server doesn't work properly. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/513525 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 513525] Re: If you read this text, your display server doesn't work properly.
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 423694 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/423694 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 504811 display server is broken ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 423694 session active, not inhibited, screen idle message -- If you read this text, your display server doesn't work properly. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/513525 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 504811] Re: display server is broken
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 423694 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/423694 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 423694 session active, not inhibited, screen idle message -- display server is broken https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/504811 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 423694] Re: session active, not inhibited, screen idle message
I see that this bug is fixed for lucid, but does that mean that it won't be fixed in karmic? -- session active, not inhibited, screen idle message https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/423694 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 476131] [NEW] Totem crashes with some languages on DVD
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: totem Hi, I am using Totem 2.28.2 on Karmic. I have a Dell Inspiron B130 laptop. When I play a certain DVD, it works with English, but crashes about 5 seconds into the move when I set it to Portuguese from the DVD menu. Here is the output: libdvdread: Encrypted DVD support unavailable. **** ** No css library available. See ** ** /usr/share/doc/libdvdread4/README.Debian ** ** for more information. ** **** libdvdnav: Using dvdnav version 4.1.3 libdvdread: Encrypted DVD support unavailable. **** ** No css library available. See ** ** /usr/share/doc/libdvdread4/README.Debian ** ** for more information. ** **** libdvdnav: DVD Title: SomethingChanged libdvdnav: DVD Serial Number: 353380E8 libdvdnav: DVD Title (Alternative): libdvdnav: Unable to find map file '/home/username/.dvdnav/dvyfDVA_V20.map' libdvdnav: DVD disk reports itself with Region mask 0x0040. Regions: 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 *** glibc detected *** totem: corrupted double-linked list: 0xb4c13ea0 *** === Backtrace: = /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6[0x1096ff1] /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6[0x109a36f] /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6(__libc_malloc+0x58)[0x109b868] /usr/lib/libxcb.so.1[0xa93eb6] /usr/lib/libxcb.so.1[0xa91e1b] /usr/lib/libxcb.so.1(xcb_wait_for_reply+0x142)[0xa939d2] /usr/lib/libX11.so.6(_XReply+0xe6)[0x5505506] /usr/lib/libX11.so.6(_XGetWindowAttributes+0xc3)[0x54e3a03] /usr/lib/libX11.so.6(XGetWindowAttributes+0x42)[0x54e3b82] /usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstxvimagesink.so[0x68dc76c] /usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstxvimagesink.so[0x68dcd7b] /usr/lib/libgstvideo-0.10.so.0[0x310111] /usr/lib/libgstbase-0.10.so.0[0x151ef8] /usr/lib/libgstbase-0.10.so.0[0x1536b7] /usr/lib/libgstbase-0.10.so.0[0x155759] /usr/lib/libgstbase-0.10.so.0[0x155d0d] /usr/lib/libgstreamer-0.10.so.0[0xb50a95] /usr/lib/libgstreamer-0.10.so.0[0xb51600] /usr/lib/libgstreamer-0.10.so.0[0xb39f2d] /usr/lib/libgstreamer-0.10.so.0[0xb50a95] /usr/lib/libgstreamer-0.10.so.0[0xb51600] /usr/lib/libgstreamer-0.10.so.0[0xb39f2d] /usr/lib/libgstreamer-0.10.so.0[0xb50a95] /usr/lib/libgstreamer-0.10.so.0[0xb51600] /usr/lib/libgstreamer-0.10.so.0[0xb39f2d] /usr/lib/libgstreamer-0.10.so.0[0xb50a95] /usr/lib/libgstreamer-0.10.so.0[0xb51600] /usr/lib/libgstbase-0.10.so.0[0x16a868] /usr/lib/libgstreamer-0.10.so.0[0xb50a95] /usr/lib/libgstreamer-0.10.so.0[0xb51600] /usr/lib/libgstbase-0.10.so.0[0x16a868] /usr/lib/libgstreamer-0.10.so.0[0xb50a95] /usr/lib/libgstreamer-0.10.so.0[0xb51600] /usr/lib/libgstreamer-0.10.so.0[0xb39f2d] /usr/lib/libgstreamer-0.10.so.0[0xb50a95] /usr/lib/libgstreamer-0.10.so.0[0xb51600] /usr/lib/libgstreamer-0.10.so.0[0xb39f2d] /usr/lib/libgstreamer-0.10.so.0[0xb50a95] /usr/lib/libgstreamer-0.10.so.0[0xb51600] /usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstdvdspu.so[0x184e680] /usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstdvdspu.so[0x184f4a9] /usr/lib/libgstreamer-0.10.so.0[0xb50a95] /usr/lib/libgstreamer-0.10.so.0[0xb51600] /usr/lib/libgstbase-0.10.so.0[0x16a868] /usr/lib/libgstreamer-0.10.so.0[0xb50a95] /usr/lib/libgstreamer-0.10.so.0[0xb51600] /usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstcoreelements.so[0x12454cd] /usr/lib/libgstreamer-0.10.so.0[0xb70895] /usr/lib/libgstreamer-0.10.so.0[0xb721a7] /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0[0x80799f] /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0[0x80636f] /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0[0x99180e] /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6(clone+0x5e)[0x10f87ee] === Memory map: 0011-0011e000 r-xp 08:03 9087 /usr/lib/libgsttag-0.10.so.0.18.0 0011e000-0011f000 r--p e000 08:03 9087 /usr/lib/libgsttag-0.10.so.0.18.0 0011f000-0012 rw-p f000 08:03 9087 /usr/lib/libgsttag-0.10.so.0.18.0 0012-0012b000 r-xp 08:03 9544 /usr/lib/libunique-1.0.so.0.100.2 0012b000-0012c000 r--p a000 08:03 9544 /usr/lib/libunique-1.0.so.0.100.2 0012c000-0012d000 rw-p b000 08:03 9544 /usr/lib/libunique-1.0.so.0.100.2 0012d000-00134000 r-xp 08:03 8562 /usr/lib/libSM.so.6.0.0 00134000-00135000 r--p 6000 08:03 8562 /usr/lib/libSM.so.6.0.0 00135000-00136000 rw-p 7000 08:03 8562 /usr/lib/libSM.so.6.0.0 00136000-00138000 r-xp 08:03 5339 /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libdl-2.10.1.so 00138000-00139000 r--p 1000 08:03 5339 /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libdl-2.10.1.so 00139000-0013a000 rw-p 2000 08:03 5339 /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libdl-2.10.1.so 0013a000-0013d000 r-xp 08:03 9213 /usr/lib/liblaunchpad-integration.so.1.0.0 0013d000-0013e000 r--p 2000 08:03 9213 /usr/lib/liblaunchpad-integration.so.1.0.0
[Bug 359975] Re: evince sometimes yield error Error printing: Too many failed attempts
Please remember everyone that this bug is not limited to Evince. It is a Gnome bug. Once this error starts appearing, you would not be able to print from gedit or evolution or anything else that uses gnome libs. This is an absolute trainwreck of a bug for anyone but the most experienced Linux gurus. The simple fix that I have suggested several times now is to disable that wretched bit of code that checks for too many failed attempts, but this idea has continually been ignored and this bug has been continually relegated to a lower level of importance. And yes, it will probably continue in Karmic. But we're just a bunch of stupid users of free software, plagued by a bug that only affects people who use printers, which is now a minority. If we don't like it, we fix it or go elsewhere. -- evince sometimes yield error Error printing: Too many failed attempts https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359975 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 359975] Re: evince sometimes yield error Error printing: Too many failed attempts
So have we confirmed that this bug is fixed for Karmic? Or are we just artificially trying to reduce the bug count before releasing Karmic with this same bug that has been present since Hardy? -- evince sometimes yield error Error printing: Too many failed attempts https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359975 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 359975] Re: evince sometimes yield error Error printing: Too many failed attempts
Once again, I would like to propose an emergency fix for this before Karmic comes out. I am no developer, but it appears to be as simple as finding the function that is the equivalent of bool CheckForTooManyFailedAttempts() and hack it to always return false. Whatever code is checking for some sort of failed attempts is bogus and does no good. Even if there was some sort of legitimate failed attempt the user doesn't need a stupid dialog box to tell him that his document failed to print. Just blindly try to print no matter what. Can this be done? -- evince sometimes yield error Error printing: Too many failed attempts https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359975 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 364275] Re: Failed to print document / Too many failed attempts
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 359975 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359975 Workaround here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/359975/comments/30 -- Failed to print document / Too many failed attempts https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/364275 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 359975] Re: evince sometimes yield error Error printing: Too many failed attempts
On the more technical side, could somebody please look into the quick fix I suggested above? I would too it myself but I'm too stupid. But I'm 99% sure that it would do the trick to avoid this annoying/fatal bug for Karmic. Thanks. -- evince sometimes yield error Error printing: Too many failed attempts https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359975 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 359975] Re: evince sometimes yield error Error printing: Too many failed attempts
I can confirm peter gervai's fix. What a crazy bug! Never seen anything like it. Test Process: 1. Find a big, complex PDF file. I went to http://news.google.com and printed off the whole thing to a 5 page PDF file, about 1.5 MB in size. 2. Open the PDF with Evince, click print, and then let your mouse rest in the taskbar or window manager bar. 3. Enjoy the Too many failed attempts message after a few seconds. 4. Wash, rinse, repeat. It will fail. 5. Now try again, click print on the same document in Evince, but this time start peddling. In an effort to eliminate the worldwide obesity problem, it is necessary to work hard for your PDF document! Start moving your mouse in circles around the screen of Evince while it spools the document. It will succeed. 6. Enjoy your printer. -- evince sometimes yield error Error printing: Too many failed attempts https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359975 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 270976] Re: [SRU] gst-plugins-bad0.10 needs rebuilding with mjpegtools to enable burning video with Brasero
I tried installing the karmic gst-plugins-bad-multiverse0.10 on Jaunty and rebuilding the gst database, but Brasero still can't burn video DVDs. -- [SRU] gst-plugins-bad0.10 needs rebuilding with mjpegtools to enable burning video with Brasero https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/270976 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 270976] Re: [SRU] gst-plugins-bad0.10 needs rebuilding with mjpegtools to enable burning video with Brasero
I tried installing the karmic gst-plugins-bad-multiverse0.10 on Jaunty and rebuilding the gst database, but Brasero still can't burn video DVDs. Sorry, forget about that, I didnt have libavcodec-unstripped-52 installed. We really need to fix the dependencies or at least the recommends for brasero, or create a brasero-video-illegal package or something to simplify this. -- [SRU] gst-plugins-bad0.10 needs rebuilding with mjpegtools to enable burning video with Brasero https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/270976 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 359975] Re: evince sometimes yield error Error printing: Too many failed attempts
Why in the world is this bug rated as Low importance? When a user is trying to print a document quickly and run out the door to an appointment, this bug is the most infuriating thing possible. I know someone who is thinking about switching back to Windows from Ubuntu, principally due to this idiotic Too many failed attempts error. -- evince sometimes yield error Error printing: Too many failed attempts https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359975 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 359975] Re: evince sometimes yield error Error printing: Too many failed attempts
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=591846 ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #591846 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=591846 -- evince sometimes yield error Error printing: Too many failed attempts https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359975 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 359975] Re: evince sometimes yield error Error printing: Too many failed attempts
Just a quick idea: Wouldn't it be easiest to just completely disable the code that checks for the Too many failed attempts condition? The condition is being erroneously detected, and it can't do damage if it tries to print no matter what. -- evince sometimes yield error Error printing: Too many failed attempts https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359975 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 384434] [NEW] totem-gstreamer can't switch subtitle and language
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: totem Hi, to learn different languages, I find it useful to change the language on DVDs during playback. I also find it useful to change the subtitles during playback. This works well with VLC. But if a multilanguage DVD has an initial menu screen for selecting the language, totem doesn't list any of the other languages for subtitles or audio tracks, and therefore can't change them. Thanks! ** Affects: totem (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- totem-gstreamer can't switch subtitle and language https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/384434 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to totem in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 359975] Re: evince sometimes yield error Error printing: Too many failed attempts
It happens all the time in Evince for me. Absolute show-stopper. How about a fix or a workaround please? -- evince sometimes yield error Error printing: Too many failed attempts https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359975 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 359975] Re: evince sometimes yield error Error printing: Too many failed attempts
This occurs on Jaunty, I should have mentioned. -- evince sometimes yield error Error printing: Too many failed attempts https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359975 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 361179] Re: Partially Corrupt JPEG Won't Show in Gthumb
** Attachment added: damaged.jpg http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25459268/damaged.jpg -- Partially Corrupt JPEG Won't Show in Gthumb https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/361179 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gthumb in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 361179] [NEW] Partially Corrupt JPEG Won't Show in Gthumb
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gthumb Hi there, I am attaching a partially corrupt JPEG that my failing digital camera took. In most image viewers, the lower part of the image is just grey. But with Gthumb, it refuses to thumbnail or display the valid upper part of the image. EOG, however, is able to display the valid part of the image. Gthumb should display all valid parts of the image instead of just failing. Thanks! ** Affects: gthumb (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Partially Corrupt JPEG Won't Show in Gthumb https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/361179 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gthumb in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 361179] Re: Partially Corrupt JPEG Won't Show in Gthumb
Michael Chudobiak wrote: eog uses a progressive loader that displays bits of the file as it reads it. Thus it shows some of the file before aborting. gthumb reads the whole file first before displaying. Thus it fails before displaying. gimp does the same. Anyway, there is no proper way to handle corrupt files. This isn't a bug, and it won't be fixed. - Mike How is this not a bug? Is it somehow preferable to lose ALL of a corrupt file instead of at least seeing part of it? Is not EOG's behavior preferable? So why couldn't Gthumb be made to use the same progressive loading method? Doesn't seem like rocket science to me. -- Partially Corrupt JPEG Won't Show in Gthumb https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/361179 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gthumb in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 356369] [NEW] gnome-system-monitor Change Priority doesn't work
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-system-monitor Hi, Gnome System Monitor's option to Change Process Priority doesn't actually change the nicelevel, misleading users to think that they are renicing the process when in reality nothing happens. I imagine this is a permissions problem, since I am trying to change the priority as a normal user and I was never asked to enter my admin password. I'm on Ubuntu 8.10. Thanks. ** Affects: gnome-system-monitor (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- gnome-system-monitor Change Priority doesn't work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/356369 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-system-monitor in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 351576] [NEW] Can't Burn VCDs, only SVCDs
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: brasero Hi, Coulf Brasero be configured to accept cue/bin files in regular VCD format? Right now it only allows SVCD. Thanks. ** Affects: brasero (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Can't Burn VCDs, only SVCDs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351576 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to brasero in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 351576] Re: Can't Burn VCDs, only SVCDs
I am using 0.9.1 on Intrepid. I don't use Jaunty yet. Thanks! Pedro Villavicencio wrote: which version of brasero are you running? did you tried with the latest one in jaunty? ** Changed in: brasero (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low ** Changed in: brasero (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete ** Changed in: brasero (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Ubuntu Desktop Bugs (desktop-bugs) -- Can't Burn VCDs, only SVCDs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351576 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 348202] [NEW] Impossible to print to custom page size in Evince
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: evince Hi, Printing anything on non-standard paper sizes is impossible. The Custom paper size in system-config-printer does not allow you to actually set anything. And the custom paper sizes setting in Evince does not actually stick. After setting it and hitting apply, it reverts back to A4. This is the case at least with the cups-pdf and hpijs drivers. Thanks. ** Affects: evince (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Impossible to print to custom page size in Evince https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348202 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evince in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 314404] Re: Gnome brightness keybinding OSD locks interface
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 261721 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261721 OK, good, the update to kernel 2.6.27-8 fixed it. Thanks! ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 261721 X never sees brightness key release events -- Gnome brightness keybinding OSD locks interface https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314404 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 314404] Re: Gnome brightness keybinding OSD locks interface
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 261721 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261721 Thanks for the tip! Ben Trusty wrote: *** This bug is a duplicate of bug 261721 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261721 Sb, Ctrl+Alt+F2 will fix X but not kill everything (and require you to log back in) if it has gotten to a state where Ctrl+Alt+F2 drops you to a command line login, then hit Ctrl+Alt+F6 or Ctrl+Alt+F7 and it will take you back to X, fixed. best of luck On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 11:30 AM, Sbsb56...@gmail.com wrote: *** This bug is a duplicate of bug 261721 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261721 OK, good, the update to kernel 2.6.27-8 fixed it. Thanks! ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 261721 X never sees brightness key release events -- Gnome brightness keybinding OSD locks interface https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314404 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug (via bug 261721). Status in gnome-power-manager source package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Hello, I have Ubuntu 8.10 on a Dell Inspiron B130 (1300) laptop. When I use the hardware brightness control (Fn+ Arrow Up/Down) with Gnome running, the OSD pops up and moves erratically, and then most elements of the interface lock up, including the keyboard and most of the icons fail to respond. The OSD brightness indicator does not go away either. I have to Ctl+Alt+Backspace to restart X. The volume control OSD works correctly as expected. The brightness controls function normally when I am not running Gnome. Additionally, the Gnome brighness panel applet causes the same interface lockup problems. I did not have this issue with Ubuntu 8.04. Thanks for the help! -- Gnome brightness keybinding OSD locks interface https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314404 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 314404] Re: Gnome brightness keybinding OSD locks interface
Hello, thanks for looking into this. Sorry, I do not have the Ubuntu live CD, I installed from the alternate install CD. My internet connection is slow and unreliable, so I can't download the live CD right now. I should have mentioned that my laptop has Intel 915 graphics. I don't think gnome-power-manager has error reporting built in. Anything else I can do to help? Thanks! -- Gnome brightness keybinding OSD locks interface https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314404 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 314404] Re: Gnome brightness keybinding OSD locks interface
Ok, here's the log of: gnome-power-bugreport.sh gpm.log ** Attachment added: gpm.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20998814/gpm.log -- Gnome brightness keybinding OSD locks interface https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314404 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 314404] Re: Gnome brightness keybinding OSD locks interface
And here's the log of: dbus-monitor --session type='signal',interface='org.freedesktop.PowerManagement.Backlight' ** Attachment added: gpm.log.1 http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20998881/gpm.log.1 -- Gnome brightness keybinding OSD locks interface https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314404 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 202546] Re: [Hardy] Brasero fails if CUE sheet only specifies filename
Why not make this available for Hardy? It's a needed bugfix. -- [Hardy] Brasero fails if CUE sheet only specifies filename https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/202546 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
