Re: compiler warnings, -Werror, etc.
On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 21:18 +0200, Philip Withnall wrote: On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 13:24 -0400, Colin Walters wrote: On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 17:28 +0200, Frederic Peters wrote: Colin Walters wrote: For compiler warning defaults, I think something similar what Dan Winship has in libsoup is what we should replicate across more GNOME modules: http://git.gnome.org/browse/libsoup/tree/configure.ac?id=f5902fce98ae0314f0d9ca6e544895548c94a456#n339 It's better than the GNOME_COMPILE_WARNINGS macro in gnome-common right now, and *definitely* better than various modules having -Wall -Werror. Is there some problem in fixing that macro? It would instantly fix dozens of modules (over 50 according to a quick grep). Sure, I'm fine with that myself. Let's see if anyone has objections, if not I'll try a test build and see if anything needs fixing. Not everything uses GNOME_COMPILE_WARNINGS, but that's not a big deal - my main goal here is to in order: Furthermore, is there any reason why modules shouldn't be using GNOME_COMPILE_WARNINGS? It would be great if we could standardise on using it so that we can guarantee that the classes of bugs it detects are highlighted (and perhaps eventually eliminated) in GNOME code. Philip If module is using Vala probably warnings are useless for code generated by the compiler. Maciej ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: Support both gstreamer 0.10 and 1.0 for GNOME 3.6?
Le 29/07/2012 04:58, Olav Vitters a écrit : What of that is on the Ubuntu cd? sushi is the only source listed there not on the Ubuntu CD I think in summary you say the following: - Not tested yet by wide audience meaning: development versions of distros well, you can reverse the question, who tested it. Does it represent a small subset of a big one of the GNOME userbase? - Don't want gstreamer 0.10 and 1.0 on one cd meaning: fine if some stuff still uses 0.10, as long as it is not on the cd. I don't see something like Sushi being a problem. right, Ubuntu as a distributor doesn't want to have to ship and support two stacks of gstreamer packages on our default installation, it would probably be better for GNOME as well to use only one. You forgot one the availability of codecs distributors and users rely on for gstreamer1 Sebastien Bacher ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: Support both gstreamer 0.10 and 1.0 for GNOME 3.6?
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Sebastien Bacher seb...@ubuntu.com wrote: Le 29/07/2012 04:58, Olav Vitters a écrit : What of that is on the Ubuntu cd? sushi is the only source listed there not on the Ubuntu CD I think in summary you say the following: - Not tested yet by wide audience meaning: development versions of distros well, you can reverse the question, who tested it. Does it represent a small subset of a big one of the GNOME userbase? - Don't want gstreamer 0.10 and 1.0 on one cd meaning: fine if some stuff still uses 0.10, as long as it is not on the cd. I don't see something like Sushi being a problem. right, Ubuntu as a distributor doesn't want to have to ship and support two stacks of gstreamer packages on our default installation, it would probably be better for GNOME as well to use only one. Can you add anything that is on your live cd and uses gstreamer to this list (if it isn't there yet) ? https://live.gnome.org/GnomeGoals/PortToGstreamer1 You forgot one the availability of codecs distributors and users rely on for gstreamer1 That's a question only fluendo can answer. ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: Support both gstreamer 0.10 and 1.0 for GNOME 3.6?
Le 29/07/2012 12:11, Matthias Clasen a écrit : Can you add anything that is on your live cd and uses gstreamer to this list (if it isn't there yet) ? https://live.gnome.org/GnomeGoals/PortToGstreamer1 Editing the wiki doesn't seem to work for me at the moment I get a TextCha: Wrong answer! Go back and try again... every time I try to commit the changes I will try again later Things I listed: bluez libreoffice gnome-media (gnome-sound-recorder is still useful) libgnome-media-profiles (gnome-media build-depends on it) libdmapsharing (rhythmbox uses it) pidgin (empathy uses libpurple for non jabber accounts) Cheers, Sebastien Bacher ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: Support both gstreamer 0.10 and 1.0 for GNOME 3.6?
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Sebastien Bacher seb...@ubuntu.com wrote: bluez libreoffice gnome-media (gnome-sound-recorder is still useful) libgnome-media-profiles (gnome-media build-depends on it) libdmapsharing (rhythmbox uses it) pidgin (empathy uses libpurple for non jabber accounts) I've added these now, thanks. ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
