DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14553] - Add support for a separate CLASSPATH

2006-07-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUGĀ·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14553.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED ANDĀ·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14553


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-07-11 09:52 ---
I think the -lib option should make Max happy.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14553] - Add support for a separate CLASSPATH

2003-03-13 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14553.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14553

Add support for a separate CLASSPATH





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-03-13 16:25 ---
 Ok - I almost rest my case :) ...
 by using taskdef resource/file one can reduce
 it to a one-liner, but I still see it as a much
 cleaner way to specify the tasks available to ant
 from the outside instead of locally in each build.xml file

Actually, I much prefer this one liner that an ANTCLASSPATH.
At least some Ant committers prefer explicit things, and the taskdef
at the top of all of your build files makes it explicit they are using
custom tasks/types. You'll have a hard time introducing a magic feature
when there's a clean and simple explicit way to do the same... --DD


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14553] - Add support for a separate CLASSPATH

2003-03-13 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14553.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14553

Add support for a separate CLASSPATH





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-03-13 16:56 ---
1. Do you know about how to import XML fragments into a build file? Look in the
ant in anger document with your ant install. Ant1.6 provisionally has an
import task to do this more cleanly.

2. if you have 5 custom tasks in one single jar, you only need one taskdef
-just point it at a properties file listing taskname=classname mappings.


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14553] - Add support for a separate CLASSPATH

2003-03-12 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14553.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14553

Add support for a separate CLASSPATH





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-03-12 17:15 ---
You do not need this functionality for home built tasks; you just include a
classpath in the taskdef declarations. You may need it for optional tasks, but
you really ought to have the versions of things (like junit) that ant was built
against, as differences cause trouble.

You may want to know that the startup scripts cause an inordinate amount of
support calls, especially related to win9x, cygwin, 4nt, and obscure unix
variants, spaces in file and directory names and other little gotchas. For this
reason we are very leery of changing them when they seem to work, and are mostly
on 'touch only when support calls come in as pre-release testing is impossible'.
For this reason, even simple changes are viewed as dangerous. You are of course,
free to change your copies. I have been known to have different versions of
runant.pl for different projects for related purposes.

In ant1.6 we are actually looking at replacing the .bat based classloading
process with a boot loader jar, similar to that of tomcat, though performance is
 potentially an issue there. supporting a new env variable in that process may
work. 

Leaving the report as open till that time.


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14553] - Add support for a separate CLASSPATH

2003-03-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14553.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14553

Add support for a separate CLASSPATH





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-03-11 07:02 ---
The only libraries you need in the ant dirs are the things that the various
optonal ant tasks need: junit, NetComponents, whatever and the xml parsers. But
you can isolate your javac and java tasks from these details; I never
include the ant lib when I build and run things. 

What is so wrong with that process? Are you trying to use different versions of
junit with the junit task for different projects?