Re: [collections] util class constructors

2013-11-10 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On 11/10/2013 09:16 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
 Historically we have included these for tools like Apache velocity, but
 these days velocity no longer needs them. In [functor] we have dropped
 them, and I suggest we do the same for collections 4.0.

All the util constructors have been made private, unless it has been
missed for one.

Thomas

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org



Re: [collections] util class constructors

2013-11-10 Thread Bruno P. Kinoshita
+1 

Cheers

Bruno


- Original Message -
 From: Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com
 To: dev@commons.apache.org
 Cc: 
 Sent: Sunday, November 10, 2013 6:16 PM
 Subject: [collections] util class constructors
 
 Historically we have included these for tools like Apache velocity, but
 these days velocity no longer needs them. In [functor] we have dropped
 them, and I suggest we do the same for collections 4.0.
 
 Matt


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org



Re: [collections] util class constructors

2013-11-10 Thread Matt Benson
Great. Thanks, Thomas!

Matt
On Nov 10, 2013 3:14 PM, Thomas Neidhart thomas.neidh...@gmail.com
wrote:

 On 11/10/2013 09:16 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
  Historically we have included these for tools like Apache velocity, but
  these days velocity no longer needs them. In [functor] we have dropped
  them, and I suggest we do the same for collections 4.0.

 All the util constructors have been made private, unless it has been
 missed for one.

 Thomas

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org