Re: [collections] util class constructors
On 11/10/2013 09:16 PM, Matt Benson wrote: Historically we have included these for tools like Apache velocity, but these days velocity no longer needs them. In [functor] we have dropped them, and I suggest we do the same for collections 4.0. All the util constructors have been made private, unless it has been missed for one. Thomas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
Re: [collections] util class constructors
+1 Cheers Bruno - Original Message - From: Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com To: dev@commons.apache.org Cc: Sent: Sunday, November 10, 2013 6:16 PM Subject: [collections] util class constructors Historically we have included these for tools like Apache velocity, but these days velocity no longer needs them. In [functor] we have dropped them, and I suggest we do the same for collections 4.0. Matt - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
Re: [collections] util class constructors
Great. Thanks, Thomas! Matt On Nov 10, 2013 3:14 PM, Thomas Neidhart thomas.neidh...@gmail.com wrote: On 11/10/2013 09:16 PM, Matt Benson wrote: Historically we have included these for tools like Apache velocity, but these days velocity no longer needs them. In [functor] we have dropped them, and I suggest we do the same for collections 4.0. All the util constructors have been made private, unless it has been missed for one. Thomas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org