Re: [functor] modularization

2012-06-13 Thread Simone Tripodi
great +1 on that - when working towards the first [functor] release, I
was worried that if our intention is including [functor] in BVal, I
would have brought a lot of unused stuff.

count on my support!

best,
-Simo

http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/


On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 6:00 PM, Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com wrote:
 I think it would be useful to extract at least the interfaces to an
 api module, so that other libraries could depend on [functor] without
 bringing along everything.  Does anyone have any feelings on further
 subdivisions within the [functor] codebase that might be useful?

 Matt

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org



Re: [functor] modularization

2012-06-13 Thread James Carman
I like it!  Sounds like something we should do with proxy2! :)


On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com wrote:
 I think it would be useful to extract at least the interfaces to an
 api module, so that other libraries could depend on [functor] without
 bringing along everything.  Does anyone have any feelings on further
 subdivisions within the [functor] codebase that might be useful?

 Matt

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org



Re: [functor] modularization

2012-06-13 Thread Bruno P. Kinoshita
My +1 on this too :-) great idea Matt. 


Bruno P. Kinoshita
http://kinoshita.eti.br
http://tupilabs.com



 From: Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com
To: dev@commons.apache.org 
Sent: Wednesday, 13 June 2012 1:00 PM
Subject: [functor] modularization
 
I think it would be useful to extract at least the interfaces to an
api module, so that other libraries could depend on [functor] without
bringing along everything.  Does anyone have any feelings on further
subdivisions within the [functor] codebase that might be useful?

Matt

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org