Re: Packagers, Maintainers 1.3.0 release
Great! On 7 December 2012 07:15, Hans J Schroeder h...@cloudno.de wrote: On Thursday, December 6, 2012, Noah Slater wrote: Hans, cool. I've spoken with infra, and what I propose is that once I call the VOTE, you point Jan to the source for your package. Jan and build it, and then upload it to our packages dist dir. [1] (Does this sound sensible? I only propose that Jan build it because he is the guy uploading it. But whatever Jan is comfortable putting his name on is okay with me.) That's fine with me. At least it's all based on Jan's work. Post 1.3, would you like to submit a few patches to us to get this work included into our official repository? If you did, we could grant you committer rights, and you will be able to do this yourself for the next release. That sound like a plan. I'm in. - Hans Dirkjan, gotcha. Thanks. [1] http://www.apache.org/dist/couchdb/packages/ On 3 December 2012 09:59, Dirkjan Ochtman d...@gentoo.orgjavascript:; wrote: On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 9:51 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org javascript:; wrote: Can you clarify? COUCHDB-1458. Then, similar things for yajl, and preferably also for the Erlang dependencies (ejson, mochiweb, ibrowse), making sure that there are upstream versions that work with CouchDB. But AIUI this is part of Benoit's build system overhaul plan for 1.4. Cheers, Dirkjan -- NS -- NS
Re: Packagers, Maintainers 1.3.0 release
Hans, cool. I've spoken with infra, and what I propose is that once I call the VOTE, you point Jan to the source for your package. Jan and build it, and then upload it to our packages dist dir. [1] (Does this sound sensible? I only propose that Jan build it because he is the guy uploading it. But whatever Jan is comfortable putting his name on is okay with me.) Post 1.3, would you like to submit a few patches to us to get this work included into our official repository? If you did, we could grant you committer rights, and you will be able to do this yourself for the next release. Dirkjan, gotcha. Thanks. [1] http://www.apache.org/dist/couchdb/packages/ On 3 December 2012 09:59, Dirkjan Ochtman d...@gentoo.org wrote: On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 9:51 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote: Can you clarify? COUCHDB-1458. Then, similar things for yajl, and preferably also for the Erlang dependencies (ejson, mochiweb, ibrowse), making sure that there are upstream versions that work with CouchDB. But AIUI this is part of Benoit's build system overhaul plan for 1.4. Cheers, Dirkjan -- NS
Re: Packagers, Maintainers 1.3.0 release
I’m game. On Dec 6, 2012, at 23:30 , Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote: Hans, cool. I've spoken with infra, and what I propose is that once I call the VOTE, you point Jan to the source for your package. Jan and build it, and then upload it to our packages dist dir. [1] (Does this sound sensible? I only propose that Jan build it because he is the guy uploading it. But whatever Jan is comfortable putting his name on is okay with me.) Post 1.3, would you like to submit a few patches to us to get this work included into our official repository? If you did, we could grant you committer rights, and you will be able to do this yourself for the next release. Dirkjan, gotcha. Thanks. [1] http://www.apache.org/dist/couchdb/packages/ On 3 December 2012 09:59, Dirkjan Ochtman d...@gentoo.org wrote: On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 9:51 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote: Can you clarify? COUCHDB-1458. Then, similar things for yajl, and preferably also for the Erlang dependencies (ejson, mochiweb, ibrowse), making sure that there are upstream versions that work with CouchDB. But AIUI this is part of Benoit's build system overhaul plan for 1.4. Cheers, Dirkjan -- NS
Re: Packagers, Maintainers 1.3.0 release
On Thursday, December 6, 2012, Noah Slater wrote: Hans, cool. I've spoken with infra, and what I propose is that once I call the VOTE, you point Jan to the source for your package. Jan and build it, and then upload it to our packages dist dir. [1] (Does this sound sensible? I only propose that Jan build it because he is the guy uploading it. But whatever Jan is comfortable putting his name on is okay with me.) That's fine with me. At least it's all based on Jan's work. Post 1.3, would you like to submit a few patches to us to get this work included into our official repository? If you did, we could grant you committer rights, and you will be able to do this yourself for the next release. That sound like a plan. I'm in. - Hans Dirkjan, gotcha. Thanks. [1] http://www.apache.org/dist/couchdb/packages/ On 3 December 2012 09:59, Dirkjan Ochtman d...@gentoo.org javascript:; wrote: On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 9:51 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.orgjavascript:; wrote: Can you clarify? COUCHDB-1458. Then, similar things for yajl, and preferably also for the Erlang dependencies (ejson, mochiweb, ibrowse), making sure that there are upstream versions that work with CouchDB. But AIUI this is part of Benoit's build system overhaul plan for 1.4. Cheers, Dirkjan -- NS
Re: Packagers, Maintainers 1.3.0 release
On Dec 3, 2012, at 10:59 , Dirkjan Ochtman d...@gentoo.org wrote: On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 9:51 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote: Can you clarify? COUCHDB-1458. Then, similar things for yajl, and preferably also for the Erlang dependencies (ejson, mochiweb, ibrowse), making sure that there are upstream versions that work with CouchDB. But AIUI this is part of Benoit's build system overhaul plan for 1.4. Yes, we are slowly working towards something like this :) Cheers Jan --
Re: Packagers, Maintainers 1.3.0 release
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 9:51 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote: Can you clarify? COUCHDB-1458. Then, similar things for yajl, and preferably also for the Erlang dependencies (ejson, mochiweb, ibrowse), making sure that there are upstream versions that work with CouchDB. But AIUI this is part of Benoit's build system overhaul plan for 1.4. Cheers, Dirkjan
Re: Packagers, Maintainers 1.3.0 release
On 28 November 2012 15:38, Dirkjan Ochtman d...@gentoo.org wrote: It would be really nice if some effort was spent on making it easier to use system versions of dependencies, but I believe that is targeted for the near future? Can you clarify? -- NS
Re: Packagers, Maintainers 1.3.0 release
Hans, When we cut the 1.3 release in the next few days (we are blocked on one bug) will you be able to co-ordinate with me and Dave to produce an OS X package. I am hoping that you are able to build this from the release artefact, and then we can upload it to our regular dist directory. (I have checked with Infra, and this is perfectly cromulent.) Thanks, On 29 November 2012 21:16, Hans J Schroeder h...@cloudno.de wrote: On Nov 28, 2012, at 4:23 PM, Dave Cottlehuber d...@jsonified.com wrote: - are you happy to be added to the wiki as a maintainer? yes, for Mac OS X - alternatively, a link to bugtracker (or where we can identify the maintainer) would be fine - is the link below correct for your platform? yes, link is correct. - Hans -- NS
Re: Packagers, Maintainers 1.3.0 release
Great news. The last test build I did went ok. - Hans On Sunday, December 2, 2012, Noah Slater wrote: Hans, When we cut the 1.3 release in the next few days (we are blocked on one bug) will you be able to co-ordinate with me and Dave to produce an OS X package. I am hoping that you are able to build this from the release artefact, and then we can upload it to our regular dist directory. (I have checked with Infra, and this is perfectly cromulent.) Thanks, On 29 November 2012 21:16, Hans J Schroeder h...@cloudno.de javascript:; wrote: On Nov 28, 2012, at 4:23 PM, Dave Cottlehuber d...@jsonified.comjavascript:; wrote: - are you happy to be added to the wiki as a maintainer? yes, for Mac OS X - alternatively, a link to bugtracker (or where we can identify the maintainer) would be fine - is the link below correct for your platform? yes, link is correct. - Hans -- NS
Re: Packagers, Maintainers 1.3.0 release
On Nov 28, 2012, at 4:23 PM, Dave Cottlehuber d...@jsonified.com wrote: - are you happy to be added to the wiki as a maintainer? yes, for Mac OS X - alternatively, a link to bugtracker (or where we can identify the maintainer) would be fine - is the link below correct for your platform? yes, link is correct. - Hans
Packagers, Maintainers 1.3.0 release
Hi Packagers/Maintainers, Thanks for the efforts you put into wrapping CouchDB! We'd like to sort out any packaging or distribution issues early in our 1.3.0 release cycle. Those of you whom I know of, or are interested, I've BCCd. Could you either reply back to the list (or directly to me if you prefer) so we have a direct contact for you during this release - are you happy to be added to the wiki as a maintainer? - alternatively, a link to bugtracker (or where we can identify the maintainer) would be fine - is the link below correct for your platform? If you have any issues with 1.3.x please get them into JIRA so we can track them. http://packages.ubuntu.com/precise/couchdb (or quantal..) http://packages.debian.org/sid/couchdb (or squeeze/wheezy..) or http://packages.qa.debian.org/c/couchdb.html http://portsmon.freebsd.org/portoverview.py?category=databasesportname=couchdb http://mirror.karneval.cz/pub/linux/fedora/epel/6/i386/repoview/couchdb.html http://openports.se/databases/apache-couchdb https://github.com/cloudnode/couchdbx-app http://packages.gentoo.org/package/dev-db/couchdb http://slackbuilds.org/repository/14.0/development/couchdb/ AFAICT These distros are missing packages - feel free to pick them up! ArchLinux NetBSD OpenSolaris friends A+ Dave
Re: Packagers, Maintainers 1.3.0 release
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 4:23 PM, Dave Cottlehuber d...@jsonified.com wrote: - are you happy to be added to the wiki as a maintainer? Yes, for Gentoo. - alternatively, a link to bugtracker (or where we can identify the maintainer) would be fine - is the link below correct for your platform? http://packages.gentoo.org/package/dev-db/couchdb Yes. I haven't tested with 1.3 yet -- I generally do so when there's a tarball. It would be really nice if some effort was spent on making it easier to use system versions of dependencies, but I believe that is targeted for the near future? /packagers-hat Cheers, Dirkjan
