Re: [VOTE] MINA 2.0.0
On 9/14/10 1:49 PM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote: On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Emmanuel Lécharnyelecha...@apache.org wrote: Shouldn't we consider the download of the rxtx.jar as an active choice already ? (just wondering) But, with how I proposed earlier (which I now think is wrong) rxtx.jar would be downloaded by running mvn -Pdistribute install. Don't think that would be clear to users. So, instead I think it's best not to include the serial stuff among our binaries. Those wanting to use it should instead having to make an informed choice by building it themselves. So to be clear : - the bin won't contain anything related to serial (no rxtx jar, no serial code) - the src package will contain the code of the serial project I'm fine with that if nobody object. -- Regards, Cordialement, Emmanuel Lécharny www.iktek.com
Re: [VOTE] MINA 2.0.0
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny elecha...@apache.orgwrote: On 9/14/10 1:49 PM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote: On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Emmanuel Lécharnyelecha...@apache.org wrote: Shouldn't we consider the download of the rxtx.jar as an active choice already ? (just wondering) But, with how I proposed earlier (which I now think is wrong) rxtx.jar would be downloaded by running mvn -Pdistribute install. Don't think that would be clear to users. So, instead I think it's best not to include the serial stuff among our binaries. Those wanting to use it should instead having to make an informed choice by building it themselves. So to be clear : - the bin won't contain anything related to serial (no rxtx jar, no serial code) - the src package will contain the code of the serial project I'm fine with that if nobody object. FWIW there was some feature in Maven that conditionally downloads an artifact after having the user approve the license. Perhaps we can take the same steps for the rxtx.jar artifact? Regards, -- Alex Karasulu My Blog :: http://www.jroller.com/akarasulu/ Apache Directory Server :: http://directory.apache.org Apache MINA :: http://mina.apache.org To set up a meeting with me: http://tungle.me/AlexKarasulu
Re: [VOTE] MINA 2.0.0
Wrong mailing list? On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny elecha...@apache.org wrote: On 9/14/10 1:49 PM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote: On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Emmanuel Lécharnyelecha...@apache.org wrote: Shouldn't we consider the download of the rxtx.jar as an active choice already ? (just wondering) But, with how I proposed earlier (which I now think is wrong) rxtx.jar would be downloaded by running mvn -Pdistribute install. Don't think that would be clear to users. So, instead I think it's best not to include the serial stuff among our binaries. Those wanting to use it should instead having to make an informed choice by building it themselves. So to be clear : - the bin won't contain anything related to serial (no rxtx jar, no serial code) - the src package will contain the code of the serial project I'm fine with that if nobody object. -- Regards, Cordialement, Emmanuel Lécharny www.iktek.com
Re: [VOTE] MINA 2.0.0
Yeap sorry about that did not know how this happened.
