run_tests and test_clean

2004-09-15 Thread Geoffrey Young
hi all...

in TestMM.pm we have this:

  test_clean :
...


  run_tests : test_clean
...


test :: pure_all run_tests test_clean


in a test suite with *lots* of files, test_clean takes forever.  however, I
experience has shown me that test_clean is only really required when you
make changes to a configuration file or have autogenerated files you want to
regenerate, making it a waste common development circumstances where a
single test file is run over and over again.

I'd like to suggest that test_clean _not_ be a prerequisite for run_tests,
but instead shuffle the 'test' target around a bit.  with the attached
patch, you can save *lots* of cycles by doing something similar to the
following:

$ make test TEST_FILES=t/foo.t
$ make run_tests TEST_FILES=t/foo.t
$ make run_tests TEST_FILES=t/foo.t
...

in my current situation, the first (with t/TEST -clean) runs in 45 seconds,
while the second (and subsequent) iteration runs in 29 seconds.  definitely
a plus for me :)

--Geoff
Index: lib/Apache/TestMM.pm
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/httpd-test/perl-framework/Apache-Test/lib/Apache/TestMM.pm,v
retrieving revision 1.37
diff -u -r1.37 TestMM.pm
--- lib/Apache/TestMM.pm	5 Sep 2004 00:11:30 -	1.37
+++ lib/Apache/TestMM.pm	15 Sep 2004 18:45:27 -
@@ -65,12 +65,12 @@
 	$(FULLPERL) -I$(INST_ARCHLIB) -I$(INST_LIB) \
 	t/TEST $(APACHE_TEST_EXTRA_ARGS) -clean
 
-run_tests : test_clean
+run_tests :
 	$(PASSENV) \
 	$(FULLPERL) -I$(INST_ARCHLIB) -I$(INST_LIB) \
 	t/TEST $(APACHE_TEST_EXTRA_ARGS) -bugreport -verbose=$(TEST_VERBOSE) $(TEST_FILES)
 
-test :: pure_all run_tests test_clean
+test :: pure_all test_clean run_tests
 
 cmodules:
 	cd c-modules  $(MAKE) all


httpd 2.0.51 release schedule?

2004-09-15 Thread Sascha Kersken
Hi all,

I am just about finishing a Flash MX 2004 book for O'Reilly Germany. As one
of its topics is Flash and Server-Side Programming, the book's CD-ROM is
going to contain Apache. The master CD has to be ready on Friday, so my
question: Will the final release of httpd 2.0.51 happen until then, or
should I consider including 2.0.50 instead?

Regards,
Sascha

Btw: 2.0.51-rc2 builds and installs fine on SuSE Linux 9.0 (x86).



[VOTE] Apache HTTP Server 2.0.51

2004-09-15 Thread Sander Striker
Hi,

I've put the tarballs for 2.0.51 up at http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/.
Please test and vote,

Sander


Antw: httpd 2.0.51 release schedule?

2004-09-15 Thread Andre Schild
Hello,

as there is a security problem in webdav of 2.0.50, I think a 2.0.51 release will 
happen soon.

http://www.heise.de/security/news/meldung/51086
http://www.securitytracker.com/alerts/2004/Sep/1011248.html 


André


 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 15.09.2004 10:10:15 
Hi all,

I am just about finishing a Flash MX 2004 book for O'Reilly Germany. As one
of its topics is Flash and Server-Side Programming, the book's CD-ROM is
going to contain Apache. The master CD has to be ready on Friday, so my
question: Will the final release of httpd 2.0.51 happen until then, or
should I consider including 2.0.50 instead?

Regards,
Sascha

Btw: 2.0.51-rc2 builds and installs fine on SuSE Linux 9.0 (x86).




Re: [VOTE] Apache HTTP Server 2.0.51

2004-09-15 Thread Thom May
* Sander Striker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
 Hi,
 
 I've put the tarballs for 2.0.51 up at http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/.
 Please test and vote,
 
+1 on x86_64 linux. (Worker and prefork. perchild built but not tested)
-Thom

-- 
That sounds like a lot of work... Can we out source?
The Revolution will not be outsourced!
(Slick/Monique - Sinfest)


Re: [VOTE] Apache HTTP Server 2.0.51

2004-09-15 Thread Joe Orton
On Wed, Sep 15, 2004 at 03:46:45PM +0200, Sander Striker wrote:
 I've put the tarballs for 2.0.51 up at http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/.
 Please test and vote,

+1, build+httpd-test good on the usual Linuxes here, confirmed security
fixes for mod_dav_fs, ap_resolve_env and apr_uri_parse on x86_64.

joe


Re: [VOTE] Apache HTTP Server 2.0.51

2004-09-15 Thread Joshua Slive
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004, Thom May wrote:
* Sander Striker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
Hi,
I've put the tarballs for 2.0.51 up at http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/.
Please test and vote,
+1 on x86_64 linux. (Worker and prefork. perchild built but not tested)
+1
Running on ajax.apache.org (www.eu.apache.org), which is ia64 Linux.
Joshua.


Re: [VOTE] Apache HTTP Server 2.0.51

2004-09-15 Thread Sander Striker
 From: Sander Striker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 4:49 PM


 Thanks.  I've moved the tarballs to the distribution area.

Could someone please take care of the httpd.apache.org site?
I'm in a bit of a bind currently (for at least another 1-2 hours).


Sander


Re: [VOTE] Apache HTTP Server 2.0.51

2004-09-15 Thread Joshua Slive
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004, Sander Striker wrote:
From: Sander Striker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 4:49 PM

Thanks.  I've moved the tarballs to the distribution area.
Could someone please take care of the httpd.apache.org site?
I'm in a bit of a bind currently (for at least another 1-2 hours).
Done.
Joshua.


Re: [VOTE] Apache HTTP Server 2.0.51

2004-09-15 Thread Graham Leggett
Sander Striker wrote:
I've put the tarballs for 2.0.51 up at http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/.
Please test and vote,
Tested the RPM build under RHEL3, and it worked fine: +1.
Regards,
Graham
--


Re: [PATCH2] Re: Seg fault: race conditions in mod_mem_cache.c

2004-09-15 Thread Greg Ames
Jean-Jacques Clar wrote:
Should I then go ahead and commit my patch to the 2.1 tree?
This section from decrement_refcount() makes me nervous:
-if (!obj-cleanup) {
+if (!(apr_atomic_read(obj-refcount)  OBJECT_CLEANUP_BIT)) {
 cache_remove(sconf-cache_cache, obj);
-obj-cleanup = 1;
+apr_atomic_set(obj-refcount, obj-refcount | OBJECT_CLEANUP_BIT);   }
 if (sconf-lock) {
 apr_thread_mutex_unlock(sconf-lock);
@@ -288,10 +288,8 @@
 }
 /* Cleanup the cache object */
-if (!apr_atomic_dec(obj-refcount)) {
-if (obj-cleanup) {
-cleanup_cache_object(obj);
-}
+if(apr_atomic_dec(obj-refcount) == OBJECT_CLEANUP_BIT) {
+cleanup_cache_object(obj);
 }
It's the use of apr_atomic_set().  That line will take a snapshot of the value 
of obj-refcount at some point in time, OR on the OBJECT_CLEANUP_BIT, then 
unconditionally store the result back into obj-refcount.

But there could be an unlocked caller trying to simultaneously decrement the 
refcount on another thread, right?  I say that because of the use of 
apr_atomic_dec() a few lines later.  If so, the apr_atomic_set could loose the 
decrement from the other thread. It would be better to use apr_atomic_cas() to 
set the cleanup bit because we can retry if the refcount changes.

Greg


Re: [VOTE] Apache HTTP Server 2.0.51

2004-09-15 Thread Jess Holle




Is there an ETA on the Win32 source bundle?

Thanks.

--
Jess Holle

Sander Striker wrote:

  From: "Joshua Slive" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 4:33 PM
  
  
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004, Thom May wrote:



  * Sander Striker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
  
  
Hi,

I've put the tarballs for 2.0.51 up at http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/.
Please test and vote,


  
  +1 on x86_64 linux. (Worker and prefork. perchild built but not tested)
  

+1

Running on ajax.apache.org (www.eu.apache.org), which is ia64 Linux.

Joshua.

  
  
Thanks.  I've moved the tarballs to the distribution area.

Sander

  






Antw: [VOTE] Apache HTTP Server 2.0.51

2004-09-15 Thread Andre Schild
Builds and runs OK on WIN32 as well.

André

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 15.09.2004 15:46:45 
Hi,

I've put the tarballs for 2.0.51 up at http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/.
Please test and vote,

Sander



Re: [VOTE] Apache HTTP Server 2.0.51

2004-09-15 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 10:49 AM 9/15/2004, you wrote:
Is there an ETA on the Win32 source bundle?

About one hour.

Bill




Floating 1.3.32

2004-09-15 Thread Jim Jagielski
Please review STATUS for Apache 1.3.32-dev HEAD. I'd like
to release soon. There are 3 proposed patches for
inclusion noted, 2 of which we need 1.3 patch files
for.


Re: [PATCH] fix child reclaim timing

2004-09-15 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 10:27:11 -0400, Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Here is my take on what is wrong with current code:
 
 1) It starts complaining a bit too soon.  Some third-party modules
 have rather complicated child exit strategies.  Whether or not that is
 good or bad (bad ;) ), it results in disturbing messages that wouldn't
 have appeared if we were a little more patient (2-3 seconds).  Also, I
 suspect that the use of threaded MPM affects how quickly the children
 are exiting now on Unix.
 
 2) It should never stop checking for exited processes less often than
 1-2 seconds, even if it doesn't complain to error log that often.
 Like you say, current code can wait a VERY long time for child
 processes to exit.  In practice, I see that it can wait a VERY long
 time even after the last child has exited.
 
 I'll agree that it should never wait so long, though I think around 15
 or so seconds total is reasonable.  Exiting before children are gone
 doesn't let Apache start up any more quickly; it just prevents
 potentially-useful information about timing from getting logged to the
 error log.
 
 --/--
 
 I wouldn't complain to error log at all until it has been 2 seconds,
 and then I'd still wait around for 10-15 more.  But it has to check
 every second so it finds out soon after all children have exited and
 doesn't sleep needlessly.
 

Here's a patch that does something like I mentioned above, though it
bails out a bit sooner (9 or so seconds).  The timing of the
interesting actions in this patch can be tweaked in a much simpler
manner than the old 1.3 code allows.


patch
Description: Binary data


Re: [PATCH2] Re: Seg fault: race conditions in mod_mem_cache.c

2004-09-15 Thread Greg Ames
Jean-Jacques Clar wrote:
What about calling memcache_cache_free() instead of the
apr_atomic_set(). The refcount must be more than 1, we
hold the mutex. It should work just fine..
What do you think?
That looks better as far as not loosing an update from an unlocked thread.
I'm still trying to learn the complete design though.  I see that 
memcache_cache_free() can return with OBJECT_CLEANUP_BIT set, and that 
decrement_refcount() will react to it and free the memory if it is registered as 
a cleanup.  Will decrement_refcount() always be registered?  Just wondering if 
there are any code paths where we might leak memory.

There's a similar race in remove_entity() using apr_atomic_set() to turn on the 
cleanup bit:

@@ -536,10 +529,10 @@
  * an object marked for cleanup is by design not in the
  * hash table.
  */
-if (!obj-cleanup) {
-cache_remove(sconf-cache_cache, obj);
-obj-cleanup = 1;
-ap_log_error(APLOG_MARK, APLOG_INFO, 0, NULL, gcing a cache entry);
+ if (!(apr_atomic_read(obj-refcount)  OBJECT_CLEANUP_BIT)) {
+ cache_remove(sconf-cache_cache, obj);
+ apr_atomic_set(obj-refcount, obj-refcount | OBJECT_CLEANUP_BIT);
+ ap_log_error(APLOG_MARK, APLOG_INFO, 0, NULL, gcing a cache entry);
 }
Greg


Re: [PATCH] fix child reclaim timing

2004-09-15 Thread Joe Orton
On Wed, Sep 15, 2004 at 01:48:11PM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
 Here's a patch that does something like I mentioned above, though it
 bails out a bit sooner (9 or so seconds).  The timing of the
 interesting actions in this patch can be tweaked in a much simpler
 manner than the old 1.3 code allows.

Looks just as good to me, +1

 - */
 +while (1) {
  apr_sleep(waittime);
...
 -if (!not_dead_yet) {
 -/* nothing left to wait for */
 +if (!not_dead_yet ||
 +action_table[cur_action].action == GIVEUP) {
 +/* nothing left to wait for, or we gave up */
  break;
  }
  }

...is crying out to be a do/while :)



Re: [PATCH2] Re: Seg fault: race conditions in mod_mem_cache.c

2004-09-15 Thread Jean-Jacques Clar

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/15/04 12:41 PM 
I'm still trying to learn the complete design though. I see that memcache_cache_free() can return with OBJECT_CLEANUP_BIT set, and that decrement_refcount() will react to it and free the memory if it is registered as a cleanup. Will decrement_refcount() always be registered? Just wondering if there are any code paths where we might leak memory.
An element will either be created or opened,both casesare registering
decrement_refcount() as the cleanup function to be called when the thread
is done.
To remove the 2 notedpossible race situations, in addition to another possible
onein store_body(), we could add the following2 recursive functions,
that have to be called under the protection of the lock (it is now for
all 3 cases of atomic_set32()):

static void memcache_clear_cleanup_bit(cache_object_t *obj){ apr_uint32_t tmp_refcount = obj-refcount;

 if(tmp_refcount != apr_atomic_cas32(obj-refcount,  obj-refcount  ~OBJECT_CLEANUP_BIT,  tmp_refcount)) { memcache_clear_cleanup_bit(obj); }}static void memcache_set_cleanup_bit(cache_object_t *obj){ apr_uint32_t tmp_refcount = obj-refcount;

 if(tmp_refcount != apr_atomic_cas32(obj-refcount,  tmp_refcount | OBJECT_CLEANUP_BIT,  tmp_refcount)) { memcache_set_cleanup_bit(obj); }}
Oneonly additional thing is if I could call the set_cleanup_bit() within
memcache_cache_free(), it would centralize all the bit setting into 
the 2 previous functions.
Thanks for your time on that case.
JJ


Re: [PATCH2] Re: Seg fault: race conditions in mod_mem_cache.c

2004-09-15 Thread Bill Stoddard
Not to knock over the apple cart or anything, but had a 15 second chat with Greg today and he had an idea that 
sounded good.  His idea was to eliminate the cleanup bit entirely and fold the function it is providing into 
the refcount. With the code in HEAD right now, a cache object sitting in the cache hash table unreferenced by 
any worker threads has a refcount of 0.  The change is to bump the refcount of a cache object by 1 to reflect 
that it is being 'referenced' by the hash table. This simplifies the code quite a bit (assuming I'm not 
overlooking a hole that will need plugging).  Patch against HEAD on the way.

Bill


[STATUS] (apache-1.3) Wed Sep 15 23:45:07 EDT 2004

2004-09-15 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
APACHE 1.3 STATUS:  -*-text-*-
  Last modified at [$Date: 2004/09/08 19:35:51 $]

Release:

   1.3.32-dev: In development. Jim proposes a release top of Sept.
   1.3.31: Tagged May 7, 2004. Announced May 11, 2004.
   1.3.30: Tagged April 9, 2004. Not released.
   1.3.29: Tagged October 24, 2003. Announced Oct 29, 2003.
   1.3.28: Tagged July 16, 2003. Announced ??
   1.3.27: Tagged September 30, 2002. Announced Oct 3, 2002.
   1.3.26: Tagged June 18, 2002.
   1.3.25: Tagged June 17, 2002. Not released.
   1.3.24: Tagged Mar 21, 2002. Announced Mar 22, 2002.
   1.3.23: Tagged Jan 21, 2002.
   1.3.22: Tagged Oct 8, 2001.  Announced Oct 12, 2001.
   1.3.21: Not released.
 (Pulled for htdocs/manual config mismatch. t/r Oct 5, 2001)
   1.3.20: Tagged and rolled May 15, 2001. Announced May 21, 2001.
   1.3.19: Tagged and rolled Feb 26, 2001. Announced Mar 01, 2001.
   1.3.18: Tagged and rolled Not released.
 (Pulled because of an incorrect unescaping fix. t/r Feb 19, 2001)
   1.3.17: Tagged and rolled Jan 26, 2001. Announced Jan 29, 2001.
   1.3.16: Not released.
 (Pulled because of vhosting bug. t/r Jan 20, 2001)
   1.3.15: Not released.
 (Pulled due to CVS dumping core during the tagging when it
  reached src/os/win32/)
   1.3.14: Tagged and Rolled Oct 10, 2000.  Released/announced on the 13th.
   1.3.13: Not released.
 (Pulled in the first minutes due to a Netware build bug)
   1.3.12: Tagged and rolled Feb. 23, 2000. Released/announced on the 25th.
   1.3.11: Tagged and rolled Jan. 19, 2000. Released/announced on the 21st.
   1.3.10: Not released.
 (Pulled at last minute due to a build bug in the MPE port)
1.3.9: Tagged and rolled on Aug. 16, 1999. Released and announced on 19th.
1.3.8: Not released.
1.3.7: Not released.
1.3.6: Tagged and rolled on Mar. 22, 1999. Released and announced on 24th.
1.3.5: Not released.
1.3.4: Tagged and rolled on Jan. 9, 1999.  Released on 11th, announced on 12th.
1.3.3: Tagged and rolled on Oct. 7, 1998.  Released on 9th, announced on 10th.
1.3.2: Tagged and rolled on Sep. 21, 1998. Announced and released on 23rd.
1.3.1: Tagged and rolled on July 19, 1998. Announced and released.
1.3.0: Tagged and rolled on June 1, 1998.  Announced and released on the 6th.
   
2.0  : Available for general use, see httpd-2.0 repository

RELEASE SHOWSTOPPERS:

PROPOSED PATCHES FOR THIS RELEASE:

   *) mod_rewrite: Fix 0 bytes write into random memory position. PR 31036.
  (2.0 + 1.3)
 http://www.apache.org/~nd/dbmmap_1.3.patch
  +1: nd

   *) mod_rewrite:Fix query string handling for proxied URLs. PR 14518.
modules/mappers/mod_rewrite.c: r1.259 (2.x patch - need 1.3 version)
  +1: nd

   *) mod_log_config: Cleanup log_header_out function to allow multiple headers
  like Set-Cookie to be logged properly. PR 27787 
modules/loggers/mod_log_config.c: r1.116 (2.x patch - need 1.3 version)
  jerenkrantz asks: Isn't this what apr_table_merge is for?
  nd replies: yep. But cookies won't be merged, because browsers don't
  support it.
  jerenkrantz: Couldn't we copy the table and merge the values somehow?
   This just seems like a lot of code to duplicate what we
   have already.  *shrug*
  +1: nd, jerenkrantz

RELEASE NON-SHOWSTOPPERS BUT WOULD BE REAL NICE TO WRAP THESE UP:

   *  PR: 27023 Cookie could not delivered if the cookie made before
 proxy module.

   * isn't ap_die() broken with recognizing recursive errors
   Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1: jeff, jim

   * Current vote on 3 PRs for inclusion:
  Bugz #17877 (passing chunked encoding thru proxy)
  (still checking if RFC compliant... vote is on the
   correctness of the patch code only).
+1: jim, chuck, minfrin
  Bugz #9181 (Unable to set headers on non-2XX responses)
+1: Martin, Jim
  Gnats #10246 (Add ProxyConnAllow directive)
+0: Martin (or rather -.5, see dev@ Message
[EMAIL PROTECTED])

* htpasswd.c and htdigest.c use tmpnam()... consider using
  mkstemp() when available.
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Status:

* Dean's unescaping hell (unescaping the various URI components
  at the right time and place, esp. unescaping the host name).
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Status:

* Martin observed a core dump because a ipaddr_chain struct contains
  a NULL-server pointer when being dereferenced by invoking httpd -S.
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Status: Workaround enabled. Clean solution can come after 1.3.19

* long pathnames with many components and no AllowOverride None
  Workaround is to define Directory / with AllowOverride None,
  which is something all sites should do in any case.
 

[STATUS] (httpd-2.0) Wed Sep 15 23:45:11 EDT 2004

2004-09-15 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
APACHE 2.0 STATUS:  -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2004/09/15 20:27:03 $]

Release:

2.0.52  : in development
2.0.51  : released September 15, 2004 as GA.
2.0.50  : released June 30, 2004 as GA.
2.0.49  : released March 19, 2004 as GA.
2.0.48  : released October 29, 2003 as GA.
2.0.47  : released July 09, 2003 as GA.
2.0.46  : released May 28, 2003 as GA.
2.0.45  : released April 1, 2003 as GA.
2.0.44  : released January 20, 2003 as GA.
2.0.43  : released October 3, 2002 as GA.
2.0.42  : released September 24, 2002 as GA.
2.0.41  : rolled September 16, 2002.  not released.
2.0.40  : released August 9, 2002 as GA.
2.0.39  : released June 17, 2002 as GA.
2.0.38  : rolled June 16, 2002.  not released.
2.0.37  : rolled June 11, 2002.  not released.
2.0.36  : released May 6, 2002 as GA.
2.0.35  : released April 5, 2002 as GA.
2.0.34  : tagged March 26, 2002.
2.0.33  : tagged March 6, 2002.  not released.
2.0.32  : released Feburary 16, 2002 as beta.
2.0.31  : rolled Feburary 1, 2002.  not released.
2.0.30  : tagged January 8, 2002.  not rolled.
2.0.29  : tagged November 27, 2001.  not rolled.
2.0.28  : released November 13, 2001 as beta.
2.0.27  : rolled November 6, 2001
2.0.26  : tagged October 16, 2001.  not rolled.
2.0.25  : rolled August 29, 2001
2.0.24  : rolled August 18, 2001
2.0.23  : rolled August 9, 2001
2.0.22  : rolled July 29, 2001
2.0.21  : rolled July 20, 2001
2.0.20  : rolled July 8, 2001
2.0.19  : rolled June 27, 2001
2.0.18  : rolled May 18, 2001
2.0.17  : rolled April 17, 2001
2.0.16  : rolled April 4, 2001
2.0.15  : rolled March 21, 2001
2.0.14  : rolled March 7, 2001
2.0a9   : released December 12, 2000
2.0a8   : released November 20, 2000
2.0a7   : released October 8, 2000
2.0a6   : released August 18, 2000
2.0a5   : released August 4, 2000
2.0a4   : released June 7, 2000
2.0a3   : released April 28, 2000
2.0a2   : released March 31, 2000
2.0a1   : released March 10, 2000

Please consult the following STATUS files for information
on related projects:

* srclib/apr/STATUS
* srclib/apr-util/STATUS
* docs/STATUS

Contributors looking for a mission:

* Just do an egrep on TODO or XXX in the source.

* Review the PatchAvailable bugs in the bug database.
  Append a comment saying Reviewed and tested.

* Open bugs in the bug database.

RELEASE SHOWSTOPPERS:

PATCHES TO BACKPORT FROM 2.1
  [ please place file names and revisions from HEAD here, so it is easy to
identify exactly what the proposed changes are! ]

*) Use HTML 2.0 hr for error pages. PR 30732
 modules/http/http_protocol.c: r1.483
   +1: nd

*) mod_mem_cache: Fixed race condition causing segfault because of memory being
   freed twice, or reused after being freed. Changed the atomic usage of refcount
   variable by combining it with a cleanup flag.
   modules/experimental/mod_mem_cache.c: r1.115
   modules/experimental/mod_cache.h: r1.49
   +1: clar

*) mod_rewrite: Fix 0 bytes write into random memory position. PR 31036.
   (2.0 + 1.3)
 http://www.apache.org/~nd/dbmmap_1.3.patch
 http://www.apache.org/~nd/dbmmap_2.0.patch
   +1: nd

*) mod_rewrite:Fix query string handling for proxied URLs. PR 14518.
   (2.0 + 1.3)
 modules/mappers/mod_rewrite.c: r1.259
   +1: nd
   
*) Don't link suexec against APR/etc libraries.
   http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/httpd-2.0/support/Makefile.in?r1=1.38r2=1.39
   +1: jorton, trawick, nd
   nd: what about the need of -static (dunno)?
   jorton: -static was needed only to make sure libapr etc were linked statically
   into suexec; they didn't work shared in a binary distribution because
   LD_LIBRARY_PATH etc are ignored for a setuid binary (that only matters
   for binary distributors where suexec gets relocated, since libtool 
   puts an appropriate RPATH in the binary).  Not linking suexec against libapr 
   etc avoids the issue entirely (and avoids scary 1Mb suexec binaries)
   nd: oh well.

*) mod_headers: Support {...}s tag for SSL variable lookup.
   http://www.apache.org/~jorton/mod_headers-2.0-ssl.diff
   +1: jorton, trawick
   nd: two comments:
 (1) is the use of APR_ASCII_* ebcdic-safe? I.e. shouldn't we use the
 native chars here and it will be converted later? (I'm not sure)
   jorton: I have no idea, let an EBCDIC-er complain if it breaks?
   trawick: seems that '\r' and '\n' are the better chars to check
for; this is not raw data read from the network (or directly
from SSL) but instead it is either protocol data that has 
already been converted to the native charset or it is other
   

[STATUS] (httpd-2.1) Wed Sep 15 23:45:14 EDT 2004

2004-09-15 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
APACHE 2.1 STATUS:  -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2004/09/03 02:47:19 $]

Release [NOTE that only Alpha/Beta releases occur in 2.1 development]:

2.1.0   : in development

Please consult the following STATUS files for information
on related projects:

* srclib/apr/STATUS
* srclib/apr-util/STATUS
* docs/STATUS

Contributors looking for a mission:

* Just do an egrep on TODO or XXX in the source.

* Review the PatchAvailable bugs in the bug database.
  Append a comment saying Reviewed and tested.

* Open bugs in the bug database.

CURRENT RELEASE NOTES:

* When the CVS-SVN is done, there's a bogus avendor branch that should be
  removed from most files.  The branch was created 4/27/2004.  It's safest
  (and easiest) for now just to leave it in there; the MAIN branch and the
  APACHE_2_0_BRANCH are untouched and unharmed.  --jwoolley

RELEASE SHOWSTOPPERS:

* Handling of non-trailing / config by non-default handler is broken
  http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apache-httpd-devm=105451701628081w=2

* the edge connection filter cannot be removed 
  http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apache-httpd-devm=105366252619530w=2

CURRENT VOTES:

* Promote mod_cache from experimental to non-experimental
  status (keep issues noted below in EXPERIMENTAL MODULES as
  items to be addressed as a supported module).
  +1: jim, bnicholes
  -0: jerenkrantz
  -1: stoddard
  There are a couple of problems that need to be resolved
  before this module is moved out of experimental. 
  1) We need to at least review and comment on the RFC violations
  2) Resolve issue of how to cache page fragements (or perhaps -if- we
  want to cache page fragements). Today, mod_cache/mod_mem_cache
  will cache #include 'virtual' requests (but not #include 'file' 
  requests). This was accomplished by making CACHE_IN a
  CONTENT_SET-1 filter to force it to run before the SUBREQ_CORE
  filter.  But now responses cannot be cached that include the
  effects of having been run through CONTENT_SET filters
  (mod_deflate, mod_expires, etc).  We could rerun all the
  CONTENT_SET filters on the cached response, but this will not
  work in all cases. For example, mod_expires relies on installing
  the EXPIRATION filter during fixups. Contents served out of
  mod_cache (out of the quick_handler) bypass -all- the request
  line server hooks (Ryan really hated this. It is great for
  performance, but bad because of the complications listed above).
 

  jerenkrantz: There are a slew of RFC compliance bugs filed in Bugzilla
   for mod_cache (see 'RFC 2616 violations' below).  I think
   fixing them is a pre-requisite before it isn't experimental.

* httpd-std.conf and friends

  a) httpd-std.conf should be tailored by install (from src or
 binbuild) even if user has existing httpd.conf
 +1:   trawick, slive, gregames, ianh, Ken, wrowe, jwoolley, jim, nd,
   erikabele
   wrowe - prefer httpd.default.conf to avoid ambiguity with cvs

  b) tailored httpd-std.conf should be copied by install to
 sysconfdir/examples
 -0:   striker

  c) tailored httpd-std.conf should be installed to
 sysconfdir/examples or manualdir/exampleconf/
 +1:   slive, trawick, Ken, nd (prefer the latter), erikabele

  d) Installing a set of default config files when upgrading a server
 doesn't make ANY sense at all.
 +1:   ianh - medium/big sites don't use 'standard config' anyway, as it
  usually needs major customizations
 -1:   Ken, wrowe, jwoolley, jim, nd, erikabele
   wrowe - diff is wonderful when comparing old/new default configs,
   even for customized sites that ianh mentions
   jim - ... assuming that the default configs have been updated
 with the required inline docs to explain the
 changes

* If the parent process dies, should the remaining child processes
  gracefully self-terminate. Or maybe we should make it a runtime
  option, or have a concept of 2 parent processes (one being a 
  hot spare).
  See: Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  Self-destruct: Ken, Martin, Lars
  Not self-destruct: BrianP, Ian, Cliff, BillS
  Make it runtime configurable: Aaron, jim, Justin, wrowe, rederpj, nd

  /* The below was a concept on *how* to handle the problem */
  Have 2 parents: +1: jim
  -1: Justin, wrowe, rederpj, nd
  +0: Lars, Martin (while standing by, could it do
something useful?)

* Make the worker MPM the default MPM for threaded Unix boxes.
  +1:   Justin, Ian, Cliff, BillS, striker, wrowe, nd
  +0:   BrianP, Aaron