Re: Rolling 2.1.4...
Sander Striker wrote: Justin Erenkrantz wrote: On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 08:03:43PM -0800, Paul Querna wrote: I would like to roll the 2.1.4 alpha right after APR 1.1.1 is released. I plan on rolling APR tonight or Tuesday morning. If there arent any problems, I am hoping to create 2.1.4 on Thursday. Any big outstanding issues? As far as I can tell, the Win32 fixes still haven't been backported to APR 1.1.x. Or, am I missing something? -- justin I'll go and look into this tonight if OtherBill *nudge* *nudge* doesn't beat me to it. FWIW, I've already gone ahead and tagged 2.1.4. Work is now somewhat getting in the way, so I'll get to rolling this afternoon. Sander
Subrequests should not inherit entity-header fields from the mainline request
Joe Schaefer wrote: Greg Ames [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] As it turns out, we clone all of the main request's input headers when we create the subrequest, including C-L. Whacking the subrequest's C-L header fixes the hang. Since the main request's body could also have be chunked, we should probably remove the subrequest's Transfer-Encoding header as well. Shouldn't you remove Content-Type also? The problem is that the subrequest is inheriting entity-header fields from the mainline request (mainline request was a POST). This patch should be generalised to remove all inherited entity-header fields from the subrequest. Bill
Re: Subrequests should not inherit entity-header fields from the mainline request
Bill Stoddard wrote: Joe Schaefer wrote: Greg Ames [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] As it turns out, we clone all of the main request's input headers when we create the subrequest, including C-L. Whacking the subrequest's C-L header fixes the hang. Since the main request's body could also have be chunked, we should probably remove the subrequest's Transfer-Encoding header as well. Shouldn't you remove Content-Type also? The problem is that the subrequest is inheriting entity-header fields from the mainline request (mainline request was a POST). This patch should be generalised to remove all inherited entity-header fields from the subrequest. Something that popped into my mind is, what about when you actually want to do a POST subrequest? I think it would be quite hard with how subrequests are currently constructed. I wish the all of the subrequest stuff could be refactored... -Paul
Re: Subrequests should not inherit entity-header fields from the mainline request
Paul Querna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] Something that popped into my mind is, what about when you actually want to do a POST subrequest? This is exactly what I've been struggling with in apreq. I think the only sane thing apreq can do is to assume that subrequests will never have bodies attached (so no POST data will ever be available to a subrequest via apreq). I think this is the original intent, and that the input filter cloning is just there to prevent segfaults (e.g. the subrequest might install new filters for itself). -- Joe Schaefer
2.1.4 available for testing
Hi all, There are some 2.1.4-alpha tarballs waiting to be tested at: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ Please report back with any problems. Thanks for testing! Sander
Re: 2.1.4 available for testing
Sander Striker wrote: Hi all, There are some 2.1.4-alpha tarballs waiting to be tested at: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ Please report back with any problems. Thanks for testing! +1, Fedora Core 3. -Paul
Re: 2.1.4 available for testing
Sander Striker wrote: Hi all, There are some 2.1.4-alpha tarballs waiting to be tested at: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ Please report back with any problems. Thanks for testing! FWIW: +1 Tested on: Linux (Ubuntu - Warty Warthog) Win32 (XP SP2)* Sander *) Source from the tag, no zip ball is available at this time.
Re: 2.1.4 available for testing
--On Wednesday, March 16, 2005 10:00 PM +0100 Sander Striker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, There are some 2.1.4-alpha tarballs waiting to be tested at: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ Please report back with any problems. +1 for beta on Darwin (modulo httpd-test issues from last time). Thanks! -- justin
Re: 2.1.4 available for testing
Sander Striker wrote: There are some 2.1.4-alpha tarballs waiting to be tested at: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ +1 (RHEL3 RPMs) Regards, Graham -- smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: 2.1.4 available for testing
+1 NetWare Brad [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wednesday, March 16, 2005 2:00:47 PM Hi all, There are some 2.1.4-alpha tarballs waiting to be tested at: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ Please report back with any problems. Thanks for testing! Sander
Re: 2.1.4 available for testing
+/- 0 for alpha based on apr-iconv 1.1.0 Revisiting issues for apr-iconv 1.1.1 - if that's our prerequisite, then I'm likely to lean +1. At 03:00 PM 3/16/2005, Sander Striker wrote: Hi all, There are some 2.1.4-alpha tarballs waiting to be tested at: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ Please report back with any problems. Thanks for testing! Sander
Re: Puzzling News
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: For anyone who wants to argue that this is a PHP-caused anomaly, note also http://www.securityspace.com/s_survey/data/man.200501/apachemods.html -10% followed by +11% the following month: http://www.securityspace.com/s_survey/data/man.200502/apachemods.html Big swings like that are almost always artificial. One or two big domain parkers switching versions or toggling the server header. You can't deduce much from that. -Rasmus
Re: Puzzling News
At 07:42 PM 3/16/2005, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: For anyone who wants to argue that this is a PHP-caused anomaly, note also http://www.securityspace.com/s_survey/data/man.200501/apachemods.html -10% followed by +11% the following month: http://www.securityspace.com/s_survey/data/man.200502/apachemods.html Big swings like that are almost always artificial. One or two big domain parkers switching versions or toggling the server header. You can't deduce much from that. Agreed. February reports that both 1.3.33 and 2.0.53 are proving sufficiently stable, ~90% push forward, ~10% fall back. Of course some users will encounter trouble and fall back to regroup. Some number less than 1 in 10 reassures me that the httpd project mostly is moving forward. I never look at the overall numbers, or number of adopters of any given module. Only looking for trends against the exact latest release we've shipped.
[STATUS] (httpd-2.0) Wed Mar 16 23:46:03 2005
APACHE 2.0 STATUS: -*-text-*- Last modified at [$Date: 2005-03-01 05:02:06 -0500 (Tue, 01 Mar 2005) $] The current version of this file can be found at: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS Release history: 2.0.54 : in development 2.0.53 : released February 7, 2005 as GA. 2.0.52 : released September 28, 2004 as GA. 2.0.51 : released September 15, 2004 as GA. 2.0.50 : released June 30, 2004 as GA. 2.0.49 : released March 19, 2004 as GA. 2.0.48 : released October 29, 2003 as GA. 2.0.47 : released July 09, 2003 as GA. 2.0.46 : released May 28, 2003 as GA. 2.0.45 : released April 1, 2003 as GA. 2.0.44 : released January 20, 2003 as GA. 2.0.43 : released October 3, 2002 as GA. 2.0.42 : released September 24, 2002 as GA. 2.0.41 : rolled September 16, 2002. not released. 2.0.40 : released August 9, 2002 as GA. 2.0.39 : released June 17, 2002 as GA. 2.0.38 : rolled June 16, 2002. not released. 2.0.37 : rolled June 11, 2002. not released. 2.0.36 : released May 6, 2002 as GA. 2.0.35 : released April 5, 2002 as GA. 2.0.34 : tagged March 26, 2002. 2.0.33 : tagged March 6, 2002. not released. 2.0.32 : released Feburary 16, 2002 as beta. 2.0.31 : rolled Feburary 1, 2002. not released. 2.0.30 : tagged January 8, 2002. not rolled. 2.0.29 : tagged November 27, 2001. not rolled. 2.0.28 : released November 13, 2001 as beta. 2.0.27 : rolled November 6, 2001 2.0.26 : tagged October 16, 2001. not rolled. 2.0.25 : rolled August 29, 2001 2.0.24 : rolled August 18, 2001 2.0.23 : rolled August 9, 2001 2.0.22 : rolled July 29, 2001 2.0.21 : rolled July 20, 2001 2.0.20 : rolled July 8, 2001 2.0.19 : rolled June 27, 2001 2.0.18 : rolled May 18, 2001 2.0.17 : rolled April 17, 2001 2.0.16 : rolled April 4, 2001 2.0.15 : rolled March 21, 2001 2.0.14 : rolled March 7, 2001 2.0a9 : released December 12, 2000 2.0a8 : released November 20, 2000 2.0a7 : released October 8, 2000 2.0a6 : released August 18, 2000 2.0a5 : released August 4, 2000 2.0a4 : released June 7, 2000 2.0a3 : released April 28, 2000 2.0a2 : released March 31, 2000 2.0a1 : released March 10, 2000 Please consult the following STATUS files for information on related projects: * http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/apr/apr/branches/0.9.x/STATUS * http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/apr/apr-util/branches/0.9.x/STATUS * http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/docs/STATUS Contributors looking for a mission: * Just do an egrep on TODO or XXX in the source. * Review the bug database at: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/ * Review the PatchAvailable bugs in the bug database: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEWbug_status=ASSIGNEDbug_status=REOPENEDproduct=Apache+httpd-2.0keywords=PatchAvailable After testing, you can append a comment saying Reviewed and tested. * Open bugs in the bug database. CURRENT RELEASE NOTES: * Forward binary compatibility is expected of Apache 2.0.x releases, such that no MMN major number changes will occur. Such changes can only be made in the trunk. * All commits to branches/2.0.x must be reflected in SVN trunk, as well, if they apply. Logical progression is commit to trunk, get feedback and votes in STATUS, and then merge into branches/2.0.x. RELEASE SHOWSTOPPERS: PATCHES TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK: [ please place SVN revisions from trunk here, so it is easy to identify exactly what the proposed changes are! ] [ please append new backports at the end of this list not the top. ] *) mod_ssl: Set r-user from SSLUsername earlier so that it's actually useful. http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi?rev=153280view=rev http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi?rev=151493view=rev a.k.a. http://www.apache.org/~jorton/ap_ssluser.diff PR: 31418 jerenkrantz comments: 151493 deletes a chunk and adds a chunk, with 153280 moving that added hunk elsewhere. My brain hurts. +1: jorton, jerenkrantz *) Add a build script to create a solaris package. svn rev 124104 +1: minfrin, trawick *) Get some control chars out of ap_log_error() invocations. Patch from Eric Covener with tweak by trawick: http://httpd.apache.org/~trawick/covener-removecontrolchars-2.0.patch (2.1-dev already has these fixes) +1: trawick, jorton *) util_ldap: Add the directive LDAPConnectionTimeout to control the socket timeout value when binding to an LDAP server svn rev 126565 +1: bnicholes, trawick (no need for APLOG_NOERRNO in Apache =2) *) mod_ssl: fix to access mod_ssl-specific X509_STORE_CTX userdata
[STATUS] (httpd-2.1) Wed Mar 16 23:46:20 2005
APACHE 2.1 STATUS: -*-text-*- Last modified at [$Date: 2005-03-16 12:05:29 -0500 (Wed, 16 Mar 2005) $] The current version of this file can be found at: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk/STATUS Release history: [NOTE that only Alpha/Beta releases occur in 2.1 development] 2.1.4 : in development 2.1.3 : Released on 2/22/2005 as alpha. 2.1.2 : Released on 12/08/2004 as alpha. 2.1.1 : Released on 11/19/2004 as alpha. 2.1.0 : not released. Please consult the following STATUS files for information on related projects: * http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/apr/apr/trunk/STATUS * http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/apr/apr-util/trunk/STATUS * http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/STATUS Contributors looking for a mission: * Just do an egrep on TODO or XXX in the source. * Review the bug database at: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/ * Review the PatchAvailable bugs in the bug database: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEWbug_status=ASSIGNEDbug_status=REOPENEDproduct=Apache+httpd-2.0keywords=PatchAvailable After testing, you can append a comment saying Reviewed and tested. * Open bugs in the bug database. CURRENT RELEASE NOTES: RELEASE SHOWSTOPPERS: * Handling of non-trailing / config by non-default handler is broken http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apache-httpd-devm=105451701628081w=2 jerenkrantz asks: Why should this block a release? * the edge connection filter cannot be removed http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apache-httpd-devm=105366252619530w=2 jerenkrantz asks: Why should this block a release? stas replies: because it requires a rewrite of the filters stack implementation (you have suggested that) and once 2.2 is released you can't do that anymore. CURRENT VOTES: * httpd-std.conf and friends a) httpd-std.conf should be tailored by install (from src or binbuild) even if user has existing httpd.conf +1: trawick, slive, gregames, ianh, Ken, wrowe, jwoolley, jim, nd, erikabele wrowe - prefer httpd.default.conf to avoid ambiguity with cvs b) tailored httpd-std.conf should be copied by install to sysconfdir/examples -0: striker c) tailored httpd-std.conf should be installed to sysconfdir/examples or manualdir/exampleconf/ +1: slive, trawick, Ken, nd (prefer the latter), erikabele d) Installing a set of default config files when upgrading a server doesn't make ANY sense at all. +1: ianh - medium/big sites don't use 'standard config' anyway, as it usually needs major customizations -1: Ken, wrowe, jwoolley, jim, nd, erikabele wrowe - diff is wonderful when comparing old/new default configs, even for customized sites that ianh mentions jim - ... assuming that the default configs have been updated with the required inline docs to explain the changes * If the parent process dies, should the remaining child processes gracefully self-terminate. Or maybe we should make it a runtime option, or have a concept of 2 parent processes (one being a hot spare). See: Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Self-destruct: Ken, Martin, Lars Not self-destruct: BrianP, Ian, Cliff, BillS Make it runtime configurable: Aaron, jim, Justin, wrowe, rederpj, nd /* The below was a concept on *how* to handle the problem */ Have 2 parents: +1: jim -1: Justin, wrowe, rederpj, nd +0: Lars, Martin (while standing by, could it do something useful?) * Make the worker MPM the default MPM for threaded Unix boxes. +1: Justin, Ian, Cliff, BillS, striker, wrowe, nd +0: BrianP, Aaron (mutex contention is looking better with the latest code, let's continue tuning and testing), rederpj, jim -0: Lars pquerna: Do we want to change this for 2.2? RELEASE NON-SHOWSTOPPERS BUT WOULD BE REAL NICE TO WRAP THESE UP: * Patches submitted to the bug database: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEWbug_status=ASSIGNEDbug_status=REOPENEDproduct=Apache+httpd-2.0keywords=PatchAvailable * The Event MPM does not work on Solaris 10. PR 34040. * Filter stacks and subrequests, redirects and fast redirects. There's at least one PR that suffers from the current unclean behaviour (which lets the server send garbage): PR 17629 nd says: Every subrequest should get its own filter stack with the subreq_core filter as bottom-most. That filter does two things: - swallow EOS buckets - redirect the
Re: 2.1.4 available for testing
onsdag 16 mars 2005 22.00 skrev Sander Striker: Hi all, There are some 2.1.4-alpha tarballs waiting to be tested at: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ Please report back with any problems. Thanks for testing! Sander Hmm..., I get: Starting httpd21: httpd21: Syntax error on line 241 of /etc/httpd21/conf/httpd21.conf: Cannot load /usr/lib64/apache21/mod_authnz_ldap.so into server: /usr/lib64/apache21/mod_authnz_ldap.so: undefined symbol: util_ldap_cache_getuserdn This happens on Mandrakelinux 10.1 (x86_64) and Mandrakelinux 10.2 (i586) -- Regards // Oden Eriksson
Re: 2.1.4 available for testing
Oden Eriksson wrote: onsdag 16 mars 2005 22.00 skrev Sander Striker: Hi all, There are some 2.1.4-alpha tarballs waiting to be tested at: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ Please report back with any problems. Thanks for testing! Sander Hmm..., I get: Starting httpd21: httpd21: Syntax error on line 241 of /etc/httpd21/conf/httpd21.conf: Cannot load /usr/lib64/apache21/mod_authnz_ldap.so into server: /usr/lib64/apache21/mod_authnz_ldap.so: undefined symbol: util_ldap_cache_getuserdn This happens on Mandrakelinux 10.1 (x86_64) and Mandrakelinux 10.2 (i586) Change the load order in your httpd.conf. move the LoadModule for mod_ldap to before mod_authnz_ldap. -Paul
Re: 2.1.4 available for testing
Paul Querna wrote: Oden Eriksson wrote: onsdag 16 mars 2005 22.00 skrev Sander Striker: Hi all, There are some 2.1.4-alpha tarballs waiting to be tested at: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ Please report back with any problems. Thanks for testing! Sander Hmm..., I get: Starting httpd21: httpd21: Syntax error on line 241 of /etc/httpd21/conf/httpd21.conf: Cannot load /usr/lib64/apache21/mod_authnz_ldap.so into server: /usr/lib64/apache21/mod_authnz_ldap.so: undefined symbol: util_ldap_cache_getuserdn This happens on Mandrakelinux 10.1 (x86_64) and Mandrakelinux 10.2 (i586) Change the load order in your httpd.conf. move the LoadModule for mod_ldap to before mod_authnz_ldap. For reference, this is also PR 33568 http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33568
Re: 2.1.4 available for testing
torsdag 17 mars 2005 06.52 skrev Paul Querna: Oden Eriksson wrote: onsdag 16 mars 2005 22.00 skrev Sander Striker: Hi all, There are some 2.1.4-alpha tarballs waiting to be tested at: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ Please report back with any problems. Thanks for testing! Sander Hmm..., I get: Starting httpd21: httpd21: Syntax error on line 241 of /etc/httpd21/conf/httpd21.conf: Cannot load /usr/lib64/apache21/mod_authnz_ldap.so into server: /usr/lib64/apache21/mod_authnz_ldap.so: undefined symbol: util_ldap_cache_getuserdn This happens on Mandrakelinux 10.1 (x86_64) and Mandrakelinux 10.2 (i586) Change the load order in your httpd.conf. move the LoadModule for mod_ldap to before mod_authnz_ldap. Ahh! I thought that loading order was something from the past? Well, it works now. Will try some more after I have gotten some sleep... Thanks Paul. -- Regards // Oden Eriksson
