Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.2 as GA
Am 06.04.2012 18:39, schrieb Jim Jagielski: On Apr 5, 2012, at 8:24 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.2 can be found at the usual place: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.2 GA. NOTE: The -deps tarballs are included here *only* to make life easier for the tester. They will not be, and are not, part of the official release. I just found that a simple SSI .shtml does not work as plain text any more as it did with 2.2.x; f.e. an ip.shtml with: !--#echo var=REMOTE_ADDR-- gives me an empty reply with 2.4.2 while same works fine with 2.2.x; if I surround the SSI with html tags like: html !--#echo var=REMOTE_ADDR-- /html it works with 2.4.2 - is this now intented behavior, or am I missing something in the config? Gün.
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.2 as GA
On Sun, 2012-04-15 at 13:10 +0200, Guenter Knauf wrote: !--#echo var=REMOTE_ADDR-- Related to the removal of config option DefaultType perhaps? signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
[RESULT] Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.2 as GA
With 3+ +1 (binding) votes and no -1s, I call the vote CLOSED and PASSED. Thx to all testers! On Apr 5, 2012, at 8:24 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.2 can be found at the usual place: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.2 GA. NOTE: The -deps tarballs are included here *only* to make life easier for the tester. They will not be, and are not, part of the official release. [ ] +1: Good to go [ ] +0: meh [ ] -1: Danger Will Robinson. And why. Vote will last the normal 72 hrs.
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.2 as GA
Am 15.04.2012 13:47, schrieb Noel Butler: On Sun, 2012-04-15 at 13:10 +0200, Guenter Knauf wrote: !--#echo var=REMOTE_ADDR-- Related to the removal of config option DefaultType perhaps? maybe ... however then I would assume that assigning text/html shtml shtm in conf/mime.types should fix it - but it doesnt - at least not for NetWare; and even a ForceType text/html for the directory doesnt work for me, and AddType text/html .shtml doesnt either ... so to me it looks as if either SSI or type assingment is currently broken - at least on NetWare, not yet tested on other platforms ... Gün.
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.2 as GA
On 15-04-2012 18:36, Guenter Knauf wrote: Am 15.04.2012 13:47, schrieb Noel Butler: On Sun, 2012-04-15 at 13:10 +0200, Guenter Knauf wrote: !--#echo var=REMOTE_ADDR-- Related to the removal of config option DefaultType perhaps? maybe ... however then I would assume that assigning text/html shtml shtm in conf/mime.types should fix it - but it doesnt - at least not for NetWare; and even a ForceType text/html for the directory doesnt work for me, and AddType text/html .shtml doesnt either ... so to me it looks as if either SSI or type assingment is currently broken - at least on NetWare, not yet tested on other platforms ... Gün. I have tested your SSI tag with 2.4.2 on Debian 6 and Fedora 16 with the following options set: Options +Includes AddType text/html .shtml AddOutputFilter INCLUDES .shtml Even without the html tags, this seems to work perfectly on the machines I have tested it on, so it might just be a NetWare issue. With regards, Daniel.
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.2 as GA
Am 15.04.2012 18:54, schrieb Daniel Gruno: so to me it looks as if either SSI or type assingment is currently broken - at least on NetWare, not yet tested on other platforms ... I have tested your SSI tag with 2.4.2 on Debian 6 and Fedora 16 with the following options set: Options +Includes AddType text/html .shtml AddOutputFilter INCLUDES .shtml Even without the html tags, this seems to work perfectly on the machines I have tested it on, so it might just be a NetWare issue what is the reason to use Netware for a webserver? besides the fact that there are so many operating systems running httpd fine and Netware is EOL at all signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.2 as GA
On 15.04.2012 19:10, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 15.04.2012 18:54, schrieb Daniel Gruno: so to me it looks as if either SSI or type assingment is currently broken - at least on NetWare, not yet tested on other platforms ... I have tested your SSI tag with 2.4.2 on Debian 6 and Fedora 16 with the following options set: Options +Includes AddType text/html .shtml AddOutputFilter INCLUDES .shtml Even without the html tags, this seems to work perfectly on the machines I have tested it on, so it might just be a NetWare issue what is the reason to use Netware for a webserver? besides the fact that there are so many operating systems running httpd fine and Netware is EOL at all Please start a new thread if you want to discuss a new topic. This is out of scope for the 2.4.2 release vote. And most likely it would be better to discuss it on the user list. Thank you. Rainer
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.2 as GA
Hi Daniel, Am 15.04.2012 18:54, schrieb Daniel Gruno: I have tested your SSI tag with 2.4.2 on Debian 6 and Fedora 16 with the following options set: Options +Includes AddType text/html .shtml AddOutputFilter INCLUDES .shtml Even without the html tags, this seems to work perfectly on the machines I have tested it on, so it might just be a NetWare issue. thanks for testing! SO I need to dig some deeper ... Gün.
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.2 as GA
This is NOT the list for starting OS wars on. On Sun, 2012-04-15 at 19:10 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: what is the reason to use Netware for a webserver? besides the fact that there are so many operating systems running httpd fine and Netware is EOL at all signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
