instdso.sh ... show_bug.cgi?id=43033 - complicates make install of php
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43033 Would be great if this could get a little love. I am trying to package PHP and one error I get comes from this script. There seems to be a logic error -- as it continues to remove what it is supposed to be installing. I have added to the bug - environment values at start/stop of script - AND a two-line HACK I added to get result needed. Since I do not understand/know what the starting point should be, hard to really fix the insides. Regards, Michael
Re: Powered by icon for httpd-2.4 needs update
On 10/4/2012 4:04 AM, Nick Kew wrote: Oh dear, I have to go against the bandwagon. I like pb2 best, by a clear margin. The contrast to pb3 is that it separates the slogan visually from the name, which I find more comfortable. Pb3 jars when the text powered by ... turns out not to trip off the tongue, and the merged/lowercase httpd looks like trying to hide the name. And, just for grins, I'm against even that bandwagon :-) While I totally get the idea that this is an ASF product, shouldn't httpd be the part emphasized? Thinking along the lines of, I drive a Toyota strongCamry/strong rather the other way around of saying I drive a strongToyota/strong Camry... Therefore I like: http://www.humbedooh.com/apache/apache_pb.png (as it emphasizes httpd) http://people.apache.org/~gsmith/httpd/apache_pb2copy.png (as it has Apache but still gives emphasis to httpd) Care to share sources? Maybe I can monkey around a bit with the logo to see if I even like my the idea I mention above... -- Daniel Ruggeri
Re: Powered by icon for httpd-2.4 needs update
On 10/05/2012 04:25 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: On 10/4/2012 4:04 AM, Nick Kew wrote: Oh dear, I have to go against the bandwagon. I like pb2 best, by a clear margin. The contrast to pb3 is that it separates the slogan visually from the name, which I find more comfortable. Pb3 jars when the text powered by ... turns out not to trip off the tongue, and the merged/lowercase httpd looks like trying to hide the name. And, just for grins, I'm against even that bandwagon :-) While I totally get the idea that this is an ASF product, shouldn't httpd be the part emphasized? Thinking along the lines of, I drive a Toyota strongCamry/strong rather the other way around of saying I drive a strongToyota/strong Camry... Therefore I like: http://www.humbedooh.com/apache/apache_pb.png (as it emphasizes httpd) http://people.apache.org/~gsmith/httpd/apache_pb2copy.png (as it has Apache but still gives emphasis to httpd) Care to share sources? Maybe I can monkey around a bit with the logo to see if I even like my the idea I mention above... I'm really fine with whatever you guys eventually decide on, I'm just happy we are actually doing an update of the icons now :D The source is the SVG file already committed to trunk ;) Just open it up in Inkscape or similar and edit it. It's using paths instead of actual font strings, but originally I (and gregg) have used Droid Sans for the Powered by text ans Syncopate Bold for the APACHE text. Both are ASL and easy to find on Google's font page. With regards, Daniel.
Re: Powered by icon for httpd-2.4 needs update
On Fri, 05 Oct 2012 09:25:55 -0500 Daniel Ruggeri drugg...@primary.net wrote: On 10/4/2012 4:04 AM, Nick Kew wrote: Oh dear, I have to go against the bandwagon. I like pb2 best, by a clear margin. The contrast to pb3 is that it separates the slogan visually from the name, which I find more comfortable. Pb3 jars when the text powered by ... turns out not to trip off the tongue, and the merged/lowercase httpd looks like trying to hide the name. And, just for grins, I'm against even that bandwagon :-) While I totally get the idea that this is an ASF product, shouldn't httpd be the part emphasized? No. Apache is the brand and the logo. HTTPD is just a name. -- Nick Kew
Re: Powered by icon for httpd-2.4 needs update
On 10/5/2012 11:53 AM, Nick Kew wrote: No. Apache is the brand and the logo. HTTPD is just a name. I can agree that Apache is the brand... but isn't the focus of a 'powered by' logo the product rather than the brand? Meaning... These clothes cleaned by Procter Gamble makes less sense to me than These clothes cleaned by Tide. Could just be me, but that's how I read it. -- Daniel Ruggeri
