[VOTE] Apache HTTP Server 2.0.51

2004-09-15 Thread Sander Striker 
Hi,

I've put the tarballs for 2.0.51 up at http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/.
Please test and vote,

Sander

Re: [VOTE] Apache HTTP Server 2.0.51

2004-09-15 Thread Thom May 
* Sander Striker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
 Hi,
 
 I've put the tarballs for 2.0.51 up at http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/.
 Please test and vote,
 
+1 on x86_64 linux. (Worker and prefork. perchild built but not tested)
-Thom

-- 
That sounds like a lot of work... Can we out source?
The Revolution will not be outsourced!
(Slick/Monique - Sinfest)

Re: [VOTE] Apache HTTP Server 2.0.51

2004-09-15 Thread Joe Orton 
On Wed, Sep 15, 2004 at 03:46:45PM +0200, Sander Striker wrote:
 I've put the tarballs for 2.0.51 up at http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/.
 Please test and vote,

+1, build+httpd-test good on the usual Linuxes here, confirmed security
fixes for mod_dav_fs, ap_resolve_env and apr_uri_parse on x86_64.

joe

Re: [VOTE] Apache HTTP Server 2.0.51

2004-09-15 Thread Joshua Slive 
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004, Thom May wrote:
* Sander Striker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
Hi,
I've put the tarballs for 2.0.51 up at http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/.
Please test and vote,
+1 on x86_64 linux. (Worker and prefork. perchild built but not tested)
+1
Running on ajax.apache.org (www.eu.apache.org), which is ia64 Linux.
Joshua.

Re: [VOTE] Apache HTTP Server 2.0.51

2004-09-15 Thread Sander Striker 
 From: Sander Striker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 4:49 PM


 Thanks.  I've moved the tarballs to the distribution area.

Could someone please take care of the httpd.apache.org site?
I'm in a bit of a bind currently (for at least another 1-2 hours).


Sander

Re: [VOTE] Apache HTTP Server 2.0.51

2004-09-15 Thread Joshua Slive 
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004, Sander Striker wrote:
From: Sander Striker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 4:49 PM

Thanks.  I've moved the tarballs to the distribution area.
Could someone please take care of the httpd.apache.org site?
I'm in a bit of a bind currently (for at least another 1-2 hours).
Done.
Joshua.

Re: [VOTE] Apache HTTP Server 2.0.51

2004-09-15 Thread Graham Leggett 
Sander Striker wrote:
I've put the tarballs for 2.0.51 up at http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/.
Please test and vote,
Tested the RPM build under RHEL3, and it worked fine: +1.
Regards,
Graham
--

Re: [VOTE] Apache HTTP Server 2.0.51

2004-09-15 Thread Jess Holle 




Is there an ETA on the Win32 source bundle?

Thanks.

--
Jess Holle

Sander Striker wrote:

  From: "Joshua Slive" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 4:33 PM
  
  
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004, Thom May wrote:



  * Sander Striker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
  
  
Hi,

I've put the tarballs for 2.0.51 up at http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/.
Please test and vote,


  
  +1 on x86_64 linux. (Worker and prefork. perchild built but not tested)
  

+1

Running on ajax.apache.org (www.eu.apache.org), which is ia64 Linux.

Joshua.

  
  
Thanks.  I've moved the tarballs to the distribution area.

Sander

Antw: [VOTE] Apache HTTP Server 2.0.51

2004-09-15 Thread Andre Schild 
Builds and runs OK on WIN32 as well.

André

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 15.09.2004 15:46:45 
Hi,

I've put the tarballs for 2.0.51 up at http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/.
Please test and vote,

Sander

Re: [VOTE] Apache HTTP Server 2.0.51

2004-09-15 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr. 
At 10:49 AM 9/15/2004, you wrote:
Is there an ETA on the Win32 source bundle?

About one hour.

Bill