Proposal: switch mod_lua in 2.4 to CTR

2013-06-07 Thread Rainer Jung 
mod_lua is still marked experimental because we did not yet expect it to
be complete or the APIs to be stable. So we did expect and wanted to
allow incompatible changes.

Now that a few of us are working on it I expect it would be useful if
backports could be done quicker for some time until we think we have
approached stability.

So I plan to start a vote an switching mod_lua in 2.4 to CTR. Please let
me know your objections if there are any.

Regards,

Rainer

Re: Proposal: switch mod_lua in 2.4 to CTR

2013-06-07 Thread Guenter Knauf 

On 07.06.2013 18:26, Rainer Jung wrote:

mod_lua is still marked experimental because we did not yet expect it to
be complete or the APIs to be stable. So we did expect and wanted to
allow incompatible changes.

Now that a few of us are working on it I expect it would be useful if
backports could be done quicker for some time until we think we have
approached stability.

So I plan to start a vote an switching mod_lua in 2.4 to CTR. Please let
me know your objections if there are any.

+1 - I prosed same already some days ago ...

Gün.

Re: Proposal: switch mod_lua in 2.4 to CTR

2013-06-07 Thread William A. Rowe Jr. 
+1... this thread is sufficient for voting :)


On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Guenter Knauf fua...@apache.org wrote:

 On 07.06.2013 18:26, Rainer Jung wrote:

 mod_lua is still marked experimental because we did not yet expect it to
 be complete or the APIs to be stable. So we did expect and wanted to
 allow incompatible changes.

 Now that a few of us are working on it I expect it would be useful if
 backports could be done quicker for some time until we think we have
 approached stability.

 So I plan to start a vote an switching mod_lua in 2.4 to CTR. Please let
 me know your objections if there are any.

 +1 - I prosed same already some days ago ...

 Gün.

Re: Proposal: switch mod_lua in 2.4 to CTR

2013-06-07 Thread Daniel Gruno 
On 06/07/2013 07:53 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
 +1... this thread is sufficient for voting :)
 

+1 in that case! :)

With regards,
Daniel

 
 On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Guenter Knauf fua...@apache.org
 mailto:fua...@apache.org wrote:
 
 On 07.06.2013 18:26, Rainer Jung wrote:
 
 mod_lua is still marked experimental because we did not yet
 expect it to
 be complete or the APIs to be stable. So we did expect and wanted to
 allow incompatible changes.
 
 Now that a few of us are working on it I expect it would be
 useful if
 backports could be done quicker for some time until we think we have
 approached stability.
 
 So I plan to start a vote an switching mod_lua in 2.4 to CTR.
 Please let
 me know your objections if there are any.
 
 +1 - I prosed same already some days ago ...
 
 Gün.

Re: Proposal: switch mod_lua in 2.4 to CTR

2013-06-07 Thread Eric Covener 
 So I plan to start a vote an switching mod_lua in 2.4 to CTR. Please let
 me know your objections if there are any.
+1