Re: Jira notifications (Was: [jira] Commented: (JCRRMI-21) RMI: Unable to register NodeTypes)

2009-04-17 Thread Torgeir Veimo
True, but it's both informal and formal development discussions on the list.
Jira messages goes in the second category. I merely follow the informal
discussions.

2009/4/17 Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com

 Hi,

 On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Torgeir Veimo torg...@pobox.com wrote:
  Is there any chance the jira messages could go on the commit mailing
 list?

 That's possible, though see below.

  I assume those how follow the commit list would amount to the same people
  that are interested in jira issues mails?

 On the other hand, I would assume that everyone on dev@ would be
 interested in the Jira issues, as that's where much of the development
 discussion occurs.

 The way I see it, dev@ is for things that should happen and commits@
 is for things that actually did happen with our codebase (and web
 site). As such, Jira notifications IMHO belong on d...@.

 That's just me though, so if enough people disagree then we can of
 course change the Jira settings.

 BR,

 Jukka Zitting




-- 
-Tor


Re: Jira notifications (Was: [jira] Commented: (JCRRMI-21) RMI: Unable to register NodeTypes)

2009-04-17 Thread Alexander Klimetschek
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi,

 On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Torgeir Veimo torg...@pobox.com wrote:
 Is there any chance the jira messages could go on the commit mailing list?

 That's possible, though see below.

 I assume those how follow the commit list would amount to the same people
 that are interested in jira issues mails?

 On the other hand, I would assume that everyone on dev@ would be
 interested in the Jira issues, as that's where much of the development
 discussion occurs.

 The way I see it, dev@ is for things that should happen and commits@
 is for things that actually did happen with our codebase (and web
 site). As such, Jira notifications IMHO belong on d...@.

ACK. Please keep the Jira messages on d...@. As you noted, the rest is
filtering (Clay Shirky: It's Not Information Overload. It's Filter
Failure.).

Regards,
Alex

-- 
Alexander Klimetschek
alexander.klimetsc...@day.com


Re: Jira notifications (Was: [jira] Commented: (JCRRMI-21) RMI: Unable to register NodeTypes)

2009-04-17 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi,

On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Torgeir Veimo torg...@pobox.com wrote:
 True, but it's both informal and formal development discussions on the list.
 Jira messages goes in the second category. I merely follow the informal
 discussions.

Some Apache projects have a separate issues@ list where notifications
from issue trackers are sent. If there's enough demand we could do
something like that.

Alternatively, you could simply filter out all messages from j...@apache.org.

BR,

Jukka Zitting


Jira notifications (Was: [jira] Commented: (JCRRMI-21) RMI: Unable to register NodeTypes)

2009-04-17 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi,

On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Torgeir Veimo torg...@pobox.com wrote:
 Is there any chance the jira messages could go on the commit mailing list?

That's possible, though see below.

 I assume those how follow the commit list would amount to the same people
 that are interested in jira issues mails?

On the other hand, I would assume that everyone on dev@ would be
interested in the Jira issues, as that's where much of the development
discussion occurs.

The way I see it, dev@ is for things that should happen and commits@
is for things that actually did happen with our codebase (and web
site). As such, Jira notifications IMHO belong on d...@.

That's just me though, so if enough people disagree then we can of
course change the Jira settings.

BR,

Jukka Zitting