Re: Next steps for Chemistry
Hi, On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: All the JCRCMIS Jira issues will be migrated to the new CMIS project in Jira. I'll do this shortly. Done. * I will request Apache committer accounts for the initial committers who don't already have such accounts. I'll do this shortly. Done for Florent. For others I still need preferred account names and CLAs (if not already submitted). I pinged everyone in private and will proceed with the account requests as the required bits come in. BR, Jukka Zitting
Next steps for Chemistry
Hi, To keep everyone on track of what's happening with Chemistry, here's a list of things that are going to happen: * Based on the successful vote, I've asked the Incubator to accept Chemistry for incubation. Incubation starts on Thursday this week unless someone from the Incubator PMC challenges the proposal. * On Thursday (or once the IPMC is happy) I will request or set up all the project infrastructure listed on the Chemistry proposal. I will also move all the related code that we currently have in the Jackrabbit sandbox to the new Chemistry project. All the JCRCMIS Jira issues will be migrated to the new CMIS project in Jira. * I will request Apache committer accounts for the initial committers who don't already have such accounts. Please let me know what your preferred user account name is. The account will be associated with all the commits you make and will also become your @apache.org email address. Please check http://people.apache.org/~jim/committers.html for potential account name conflicts or provide a few acceptable alternatives. There are some delays related to setting up mailing lists and user accounts, so it'll probably take until next week before we're fully set up to start working on the project. BR, Jukka Zitting
Re: Next steps for Chemistry
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: To keep everyone on track of what's happening with Chemistry, here's a list of things that are going to happen: Thanks Jukka for this update. It would be a good day next Thursday to have Chemistry as a new project, also considering the concomitance with the CMIS Plug Fest! -- Paolo Mottadelli: http://www.paolomottadelli.com Sourcesense - making sense of Open Source: http://www.sourcesense.com
Re: Next steps for Chemistry
Hi Jukka all, Thanks for the heads up. I was looking at the code for Chemistry this morning, and it looks indeed like it's ready to be played with, but it's really lacking an integration with Jackrabbit :) I was wondering what people thought of David's suggestion that we have the Jackrabbit bindings in the Chemistry project ? Or it is too early to discuss this ? Also what is planned for the jcr-cmis code in the sandbox ? Will we be able to reuse some of that for the binding ? Anyone already working on this ? Best regards, Serge Huber. On 27 avr. 09, at 12:00, Jukka Zitting wrote: Hi, To keep everyone on track of what's happening with Chemistry, here's a list of things that are going to happen: * Based on the successful vote, I've asked the Incubator to accept Chemistry for incubation. Incubation starts on Thursday this week unless someone from the Incubator PMC challenges the proposal. * On Thursday (or once the IPMC is happy) I will request or set up all the project infrastructure listed on the Chemistry proposal. I will also move all the related code that we currently have in the Jackrabbit sandbox to the new Chemistry project. All the JCRCMIS Jira issues will be migrated to the new CMIS project in Jira. * I will request Apache committer accounts for the initial committers who don't already have such accounts. Please let me know what your preferred user account name is. The account will be associated with all the commits you make and will also become your @apache.org email address. Please check http://people.apache.org/~jim/committers.html for potential account name conflicts or provide a few acceptable alternatives. There are some delays related to setting up mailing lists and user accounts, so it'll probably take until next week before we're fully set up to start working on the project. BR, Jukka Zitting
Re: Next steps for Chemistry
Hi Serge, I'm currently working on a JCR bridge for Chemistry, that will implement the interfaces in the chemistry-api module and translate them to calls on a generic JCR repository. I was able to plug a JCR repository implementation (actually Jackrabbit running in Tomcat accessed via RMI) into Florian's TestAtomPubServer test case, and the tests passed through. Of course, there is still a lot of functionality missing... Kind regards Dominique On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Serge Huber shub...@jahia.com wrote: Hi Jukka all, Thanks for the heads up. I was looking at the code for Chemistry this morning, and it looks indeed like it's ready to be played with, but it's really lacking an integration with Jackrabbit :) I was wondering what people thought of David's suggestion that we have the Jackrabbit bindings in the Chemistry project ? Or it is too early to discuss this ? Also what is planned for the jcr-cmis code in the sandbox ? Will we be able to reuse some of that for the binding ? Anyone already working on this ? Best regards, Serge Huber. On 27 avr. 09, at 12:00, Jukka Zitting wrote: Hi, To keep everyone on track of what's happening with Chemistry, here's a list of things that are going to happen: * Based on the successful vote, I've asked the Incubator to accept Chemistry for incubation. Incubation starts on Thursday this week unless someone from the Incubator PMC challenges the proposal. * On Thursday (or once the IPMC is happy) I will request or set up all the project infrastructure listed on the Chemistry proposal. I will also move all the related code that we currently have in the Jackrabbit sandbox to the new Chemistry project. All the JCRCMIS Jira issues will be migrated to the new CMIS project in Jira. * I will request Apache committer accounts for the initial committers who don't already have such accounts. Please let me know what your preferred user account name is. The account will be associated with all the commits you make and will also become your @apache.org email address. Please check http://people.apache.org/~jim/committers.html for potential account name conflicts or provide a few acceptable alternatives. There are some delays related to setting up mailing lists and user accounts, so it'll probably take until next week before we're fully set up to start working on the project. BR, Jukka Zitting
Re: Next steps for Chemistry
Hi all, Regarding the status of the code, please go ahead and play with it but be aware that it will get refactored in the coming days and weeks, for now in our Mercurial repo until I have Apache svn access (http://hg.nuxeo.org/sandbox/chemistry , branch default), then later in Apache svn when more people get to play with it. This is still alpha code :) Regards, Florent On 27 Apr 2009, at 15:06, Dominique Pfister wrote: Hi Serge, I'm currently working on a JCR bridge for Chemistry, that will implement the interfaces in the chemistry-api module and translate them to calls on a generic JCR repository. I was able to plug a JCR repository implementation (actually Jackrabbit running in Tomcat accessed via RMI) into Florian's TestAtomPubServer test case, and the tests passed through. Of course, there is still a lot of functionality missing... Kind regards Dominique On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Serge Huber shub...@jahia.com wrote: Hi Jukka all, Thanks for the heads up. I was looking at the code for Chemistry this morning, and it looks indeed like it's ready to be played with, but it's really lacking an integration with Jackrabbit :) I was wondering what people thought of David's suggestion that we have the Jackrabbit bindings in the Chemistry project ? Or it is too early to discuss this ? Also what is planned for the jcr-cmis code in the sandbox ? Will we be able to reuse some of that for the binding ? Anyone already working on this ? Best regards, Serge Huber. On 27 avr. 09, at 12:00, Jukka Zitting wrote: Hi, To keep everyone on track of what's happening with Chemistry, here's a list of things that are going to happen: * Based on the successful vote, I've asked the Incubator to accept Chemistry for incubation. Incubation starts on Thursday this week unless someone from the Incubator PMC challenges the proposal. * On Thursday (or once the IPMC is happy) I will request or set up all the project infrastructure listed on the Chemistry proposal. I will also move all the related code that we currently have in the Jackrabbit sandbox to the new Chemistry project. All the JCRCMIS Jira issues will be migrated to the new CMIS project in Jira. * I will request Apache committer accounts for the initial committers who don't already have such accounts. Please let me know what your preferred user account name is. The account will be associated with all the commits you make and will also become your @apache.org email address. Please check http://people.apache.org/~jim/committers.html for potential account name conflicts or provide a few acceptable alternatives. There are some delays related to setting up mailing lists and user accounts, so it'll probably take until next week before we're fully set up to start working on the project. BR, Jukka Zitting -- Florent Guillaume, Head of RD, Nuxeo Open Source, Java EE based, Enterprise Content Management (ECM) http://www.nuxeo.com http://www.nuxeo.org +33 1 40 33 79 87
Re: Next steps for Chemistry
Hi Dominique, Is this code already accessible somewhere ? I'd love to have a look at it before I come on Wednesday. Even a snapshot of your working version would be fine :) Is the RMI deployment a requirement of your implementation, or just an option ? Regards, Serge Huber. On 27 avr. 09, at 15:06, Dominique Pfister wrote: Hi Serge, I'm currently working on a JCR bridge for Chemistry, that will implement the interfaces in the chemistry-api module and translate them to calls on a generic JCR repository. I was able to plug a JCR repository implementation (actually Jackrabbit running in Tomcat accessed via RMI) into Florian's TestAtomPubServer test case, and the tests passed through. Of course, there is still a lot of functionality missing... Kind regards Dominique On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Serge Huber shub...@jahia.com wrote: Hi Jukka all, Thanks for the heads up. I was looking at the code for Chemistry this morning, and it looks indeed like it's ready to be played with, but it's really lacking an integration with Jackrabbit :) I was wondering what people thought of David's suggestion that we have the Jackrabbit bindings in the Chemistry project ? Or it is too early to discuss this ? Also what is planned for the jcr-cmis code in the sandbox ? Will we be able to reuse some of that for the binding ? Anyone already working on this ? Best regards, Serge Huber. On 27 avr. 09, at 12:00, Jukka Zitting wrote: Hi, To keep everyone on track of what's happening with Chemistry, here's a list of things that are going to happen: * Based on the successful vote, I've asked the Incubator to accept Chemistry for incubation. Incubation starts on Thursday this week unless someone from the Incubator PMC challenges the proposal. * On Thursday (or once the IPMC is happy) I will request or set up all the project infrastructure listed on the Chemistry proposal. I will also move all the related code that we currently have in the Jackrabbit sandbox to the new Chemistry project. All the JCRCMIS Jira issues will be migrated to the new CMIS project in Jira. * I will request Apache committer accounts for the initial committers who don't already have such accounts. Please let me know what your preferred user account name is. The account will be associated with all the commits you make and will also become your @apache.org email address. Please check http://people.apache.org/~jim/committers.html for potential account name conflicts or provide a few acceptable alternatives. There are some delays related to setting up mailing lists and user accounts, so it'll probably take until next week before we're fully set up to start working on the project. BR, Jukka Zitting
Re: Next steps for Chemistry
hi serge, Is this code already accessible somewhere ? I'd love to have a look at it before I come on Wednesday. Even a snapshot of your working version would be fine :) i think our focus is on getting as much as possible done for wednesday, so we will check stuff in whenever it makes sense... Is the RMI deployment a requirement of your implementation, or just an option ? it is an option. i would even go as far as saying that it is an undesirable option ;) regards, david
Re: Next steps for Chemistry
Thanks a lot David :) Best regards, Serge Huber. On 27 avr. 09, at 15:56, David Nuescheler wrote: hi serge, Is this code already accessible somewhere ? I'd love to have a look at it before I come on Wednesday. Even a snapshot of your working version would be fine :) i think our focus is on getting as much as possible done for wednesday, so we will check stuff in whenever it makes sense... Is the RMI deployment a requirement of your implementation, or just an option ? it is an option. i would even go as far as saying that it is an undesirable option ;) regards, david
