On 9 October 2011 10:41, Philippe Mouawad <philippe.moua...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Sebb,
> Regarding this, if we add a checkbox in Request Sampler GUI to indicate to
> user that merge will occur on request.
> This would be checked by default unless user switches to RAW body, if switch
> is accepted, checkbox is unchecked
>
> So we would have this behaviour:
>
>   - RAW body used, no merge
>   - Post Parameter , merge occurs
>
>
> What's your opinion, do you see other issues ?

I'm not sure I want to see yet another checkbox on that screen.
Seems to me we should try to use the raw body flag to control the behaviour.

So if the raw flag is set, we don't do a merge; otherwise keep current
behaviour.

I think we should probably disable the raw option entirely for Http
Defaults, otherwise I think it will be treated as an unnamed parameter
and merged with any non-raw samplers. That would be quite confusing.

Another possibility would be to use a separate JMX attribute for the
raw body (default omitted if empty).
This would make switching easier, as the panes would not share storage areas.

Also need to look at whether the samplers can share common code for
generating the request body.
We need to look at that whether or not we use a separate JMX
atttribute, because that is where any merging is done currently.

The samples currently use
HTTPSamplerBase.getSendParameterValuesAsPostBody() to check if the
request body is being generated from param values.

Perhaps the first stage should be to try to extract all the common
code that builds the body and move that into the parent class.

> Thanks
>
> Regards
> Philippe
>
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 4:52 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> If HttpDefaults and HttpRequest both use Parameters, then the body is
>> created from both sets of parameters.
>>
>> When the body is being built, if any of the parameters have names,
>> only named parameters are kept.
>> Any unnamed parameters are ignored.
>> It's not possible to mix named and unnamed parameters; named
>> parameters take precedence.
>>
>> If both test elements have unnamed variables only, then the body is
>> created from the merging of the two sets of values.
>>
>> That is existing behaviour, and cannot be changed without potentially
>> affecting users.
>>
>> Now the raw body option is currently handled as an un-named parameter.
>> This means that the a Raw HTTP Request will be ignored if there is a
>> named default parameter, and unnamed default parameters will be
>> appended to the body.
>>
>> That does not seem right; I would expect the raw option to provide the
>> complete body.
>>
>> This will mean a change to the way defaults are handled.
>>
>> I think this needs more discussion.
>>
>> It could take a while to resolve the issues and debug the code, so I
>> think it will have to wait for a later version of JMeter; I've held up
>> the current one long enough!
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@jakarta.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@jakarta.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Cordialement.
> Philippe Mouawad.
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@jakarta.apache.org

Reply via email to