[FusionDev] [Bug 1153] Regression: 0.7.8 -> 0.8.2 - Artifacts in switcher plugins
http://bugs.opencompositing.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1153 Danny Baumann changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|dev@lists.compiz-fusion.org |erkin...@gmail.com Status|ASSIGNED|NEW -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.opencompositing.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Dev mailing list Dev@lists.compiz-fusion.org http://lists.compiz-fusion.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
[FusionDev] [Bug 1153] Regression: 0.7.8 -> 0.8.2 - Artifacts in switcher plugins
http://bugs.opencompositing.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1153 Danny Baumann changed: What|Removed |Added CC||erkin...@gmail.com Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Component|-Unknown|Plugin - Animation Ever Confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #8 from Danny Baumann 2009-04-16 07:02:08 --- >From your profile, the problem is immediately reproducable. It's the minimize animation being played for all windows. The switchers paint the icons to the place where the window normally is, not where it is after it's transformed due to the animation. Short-term workaround is setting the minimize animation match from "any" to "!(name=compiz)". Erkin, do you have any good idea for solving that one? What about not playing the minimize animation for windows that have w->hidden set? We'll still have this problem if someone sets a close animation different to fade for the switcher windows, though... and I'm not sure how the switchers can be made aware of the animation plugin modifying the window vertices. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.opencompositing.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Dev mailing list Dev@lists.compiz-fusion.org http://lists.compiz-fusion.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
[FusionDev] [Bug 1153] Regression: 0.7.8 -> 0.8.2 - Artifacts in switcher plugins
http://bugs.opencompositing.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1153 --- Comment #7 from mescalinum 2009-04-15 20:44:03 --- it surely is a configuration issue. after producing the configuration export, I reset all config to default, then enabled only window decorations, move window and static switcher or app switcher, and I cannot reproduce this issue. either I solved the issue, or I should come up soon with a combination of option that exibits this issue. thanks for your time! -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.opencompositing.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Dev mailing list Dev@lists.compiz-fusion.org http://lists.compiz-fusion.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
[FusionDev] [Bug 1153] Regression: 0.7.8 -> 0.8.2 - Artifacts in switcher plugins
http://bugs.opencompositing.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1153 --- Comment #4 from Danny Baumann 2009-04-14 07:03:37 --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > What plugin is reponsible for doing the animation for you? I tried to > > reproduce > > that using the fade and the animation plugins, but failed. > > affected plugins are Application Switcher and Static Application Switcher. I understood that part :) I just wanted to say that I could _not_ make staticswitcher draw incorrectly. > how do I control animation? Can you export your settings profile (ccsm -> Preferences) and attach it here? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.opencompositing.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Dev mailing list Dev@lists.compiz-fusion.org http://lists.compiz-fusion.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
[FusionDev] [Bug 1153] Regression: 0.7.8 -> 0.8.2 - Artifacts in switcher plugins
http://bugs.opencompositing.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1153 --- Comment #3 from mescalinum 2009-04-13 18:55:10 --- (In reply to comment #2) > What plugin is reponsible for doing the animation for you? I tried to > reproduce > that using the fade and the animation plugins, but failed. affected plugins are Application Switcher and Static Application Switcher. how do I control animation? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.opencompositing.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Dev mailing list Dev@lists.compiz-fusion.org http://lists.compiz-fusion.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
[FusionDev] [Bug 1153] Regression: 0.7.8 -> 0.8.2 - Artifacts in switcher plugins
http://bugs.opencompositing.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1153 Danny Baumann changed: What|Removed |Added CC||man...@opencompositing.org --- Comment #2 from Danny Baumann 2009-04-13 16:57:08 --- (In reply to comment #0) > after upgrading from 0.7.8 to 0.8.2, both switcher plugins suffer of leaving > artifacts on the screen*. > * (the switcher window should fade away when I release ALT key, instead some > pieces of it remain on screen, and I can clear that only by moving windows > over > it) What plugin is reponsible for doing the animation for you? I tried to reproduce that using the fade and the animation plugins, but failed. > (also I have now redraw problems with caret (the blinking bar that indicates > cursor position in text boxes) which previously I didn't have.) That's a driver problem - or rather a race condition in the design of the Xdamage extension. See e.g. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/269904?comments=all Can you re-do the video using slow animations (there is a key binding to enable them under General options -> Key bindings)? This might make the actual problem a bit more obvious. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.opencompositing.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Dev mailing list Dev@lists.compiz-fusion.org http://lists.compiz-fusion.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
[FusionDev] [Bug 1153] Regression: 0.7.8 -> 0.8.2 - Artifacts in switcher plugins
http://bugs.opencompositing.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1153 mescalinum changed: What|Removed |Added URL||http://www.speedyshare.com/6 ||35700413.html --- Comment #1 from mescalinum 2009-04-10 21:00:49 --- in the URL field a video showing the artifacts -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.opencompositing.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Dev mailing list Dev@lists.compiz-fusion.org http://lists.compiz-fusion.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
