Re: [FusionDev] Splash plugin - userrepo?

2009-02-08 Thread Guillaume Seguin
Le dimanche 08 fév 2009 à 12:19:38 (+0100), Danny Baumann a écrit :
 Hi,
 
   Considering that the splash plugin is fairly useless and not going to
   be officially supported, should I port it and move it to my userrepo?
   I personally like the plugin and wouldn't mind maintaining it.
   
  
  Well, if you're going to maintain it and port it, I don't see why it could 
  not
  be part of one of the packs, like -unsupported. Any good reason for that ?
  I agree that splash is not a primarily useful plugin, but yet, it's a 
  feature
  of the current compiz fusion, so it might be seen as a regression by some.
 
 You correctly put feature in  ;-)
 I'm ok with putting it into -unsupported, but we really should try to
 get rid of plugins that only a _very_ small minority of users actually
 uses in order to be able to concentrate on the important stuff.
 

Hm, that's right. So, what do you think should be done with splash ?

Regards,
Guillaume

 Regards,
 
 Danny
 
 ___
 Dev mailing list
 Dev@lists.compiz-fusion.org
 http://lists.compiz-fusion.org/mailman/listinfo/dev


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Dev mailing list
Dev@lists.compiz-fusion.org
http://lists.compiz-fusion.org/mailman/listinfo/dev


Re: [FusionDev] Splash plugin - userrepo?

2009-02-08 Thread Danny Baumann
Hi,
IMO we should move it to a user repo   (as Sam already volunteered to maintain 
it) and make the playground proposal reality ;-)

Regards,
Danny

- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -
Von: Guillaume Seguin guilla...@segu.in
Gesendet: Sonntag, 8. Februar 2009 13:19
An: Compiz Fusion Developer List dev@lists.compiz-fusion.org
Betreff: Re: [FusionDev] Splash plugin - userrepo?

Le dimanche 08 fév 2009 à 12:19:38 (+0100), Danny Baumann a écrit :
 Hi,
 
   Considering that the splash plugin is fairly useless and not going to
   be officially supported, should I port it and move it to my userrepo?
   I personally like the plugin and wouldn't mind maintaining it.
   
  
  Well, if you're going to maintain it and port it, I don't see why it could 
  not
  be part of one of the packs, like -unsupported. Any good reason for that ?
  I agree that splash is not a primarily useful plugin, but yet, it's a 
  feature
  of the current compiz fusion, so it might be seen as a regression by some.
 
 You correctly put feature in  ;-)
 I'm ok with putting it into -unsupported, but we really should try to
 get rid of plugins that only a _very_ small minority of users actually
 uses in order to be able to concentrate on the important stuff.
 

Hm, that's right. So, what do you think should be done with splash ?

Regards,
Guillaume

 Regards,
 
 Danny
 
 ___
 Dev mailing list
 Dev@lists.compiz-fusion.org
 http://lists.compiz-fusion.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

___
Dev mailing list
Dev@lists.compiz-fusion.org
http://lists.compiz-fusion.org/mailman/listinfo/dev


Re: [FusionDev] Splash plugin - userrepo?

2009-02-08 Thread Guillaume Seguin
Le lundi 09 fév 2009 à 08:15:28 (+0900), Sam Spilsbury a écrit :
 On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 10:38 PM, Danny Baumann dannybaum...@web.de wrote:
  Hi,
  IMO we should move it to a user repo   (as Sam already volunteered to 
  maintain it) and make the playground proposal reality ;-)
 
 
 Yeah, I'll maintain it (I have some ideas for it anyways).
 
 Does iXce want to set up -playground?
 

Will be done right after the 0.8.0 release :)

Regards,
Guillaume

  Regards,
  Danny
 
  - Ursprüngliche Nachricht -
  Von: Guillaume Seguin guilla...@segu.in
  Gesendet: Sonntag, 8. Februar 2009 13:19
  An: Compiz Fusion Developer List dev@lists.compiz-fusion.org
  Betreff: Re: [FusionDev] Splash plugin - userrepo?
 
  Le dimanche 08 fév 2009 à 12:19:38 (+0100), Danny Baumann a écrit :
  Hi,
 
Considering that the splash plugin is fairly useless and not going to
be officially supported, should I port it and move it to my userrepo?
I personally like the plugin and wouldn't mind maintaining it.
   
  
   Well, if you're going to maintain it and port it, I don't see why it 
   could not
   be part of one of the packs, like -unsupported. Any good reason for that 
   ?
   I agree that splash is not a primarily useful plugin, but yet, it's a 
   feature
   of the current compiz fusion, so it might be seen as a regression by 
   some.
 
  You correctly put feature in  ;-)
  I'm ok with putting it into -unsupported, but we really should try to
  get rid of plugins that only a _very_ small minority of users actually
  uses in order to be able to concentrate on the important stuff.
 
 
  Hm, that's right. So, what do you think should be done with splash ?
 
  Regards,
  Guillaume
 
  Regards,
 
  Danny
 
  ___
  Dev mailing list
  Dev@lists.compiz-fusion.org
  http://lists.compiz-fusion.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
 
  ___
  Dev mailing list
  Dev@lists.compiz-fusion.org
  http://lists.compiz-fusion.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 Sam Spilsbury
 ___
 Dev mailing list
 Dev@lists.compiz-fusion.org
 http://lists.compiz-fusion.org/mailman/listinfo/dev


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Dev mailing list
Dev@lists.compiz-fusion.org
http://lists.compiz-fusion.org/mailman/listinfo/dev


[FusionDev] Splash plugin - userrepo?

2009-02-06 Thread Sam Spilsbury
Hi,

Considering that the splash plugin is fairly useless and not going to
be officially supported, should I port it and move it to my userrepo?
I personally like the plugin and wouldn't mind maintaining it.

Cheers,

Sam
-- 
Sam Spilsbury
___
Dev mailing list
Dev@lists.compiz-fusion.org
http://lists.compiz-fusion.org/mailman/listinfo/dev