Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.7

2010-12-15 Thread chemit
On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 00:21:49 +0100
Kristian Rosenvold kristian.rosenv...@gmail.com wrote:

+1 (none binding)

Works fine on our project.

Thanks!

 Highlights of the release:
 * Pluggable providers are now supported, as well as manual provider
 selection
 * 2.7 is significantly smaller and lighter than earlier 2.x versions
 (Only 30% of the download size)
 * A large chunk of the highest voted issues have been fixed.
 * Some performance optimizations for forkMode=always
 * Significant cleanup/simplification of the code-base
 
 
 We solved 22 issues:
 http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10541version=16691
 
 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
 http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=truemode=hidejqlQuery=project+%3D+SUREFIRE+AND+resolution+%3D+Unresolved+ORDER+BY+updated+DESC
 
 Staging repo:
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-023/
 
 Staging site: (Sync pending)
 http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-surefire-plugin-2.7/
 http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-failsafe-plugin-2.7/
 http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-surefire-report-plugin-2.7/
 http://maven.apache.org/surefire/staging/
 
 
 Guide to testing staged releases:
 http://maven.apache.org/guides/development/guide-testing-releases.html
 
 Vote open for 72 hours.
 
 [ ] +1
 [ ] +0
 [ ] -1
 
 And here's my +1
 
 Kristian
 
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
 



-- 
Tony Chemit

tél: +33 (0) 2 40 50 29 28
email: che...@codelutin.com
http://www.codelutin.com

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



[VOTE] Release Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.7; regression

2010-12-15 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
I seem to have run across at least one case where failsafe does not
properly fail a build with test failures. I'm looking into the problem. 

Although I'm not cancelling the vote right now, you may consider
postponing further testing until I have determined the exact
circumstances. It smells like a no-go, unless it turns out to 
be some exotic corner case.

Kristian



on., 15.12.2010 kl. 09.01 +0100, skrev chemit:
 On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 00:21:49 +0100
 Kristian Rosenvold kristian.rosenv...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 +1 (none binding)
 
 Works fine on our project.
 
 Thanks!
 
  Highlights of the release:
  * Pluggable providers are now supported, as well as manual provider
  selection
  * 2.7 is significantly smaller and lighter than earlier 2.x versions
  (Only 30% of the download size)
  * A large chunk of the highest voted issues have been fixed.
  * Some performance optimizations for forkMode=always
  * Significant cleanup/simplification of the code-base
  
  
  We solved 22 issues:
  http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10541version=16691
  
  There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
  http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=truemode=hidejqlQuery=project+%3D+SUREFIRE+AND+resolution+%3D+Unresolved+ORDER+BY+updated+DESC
  
  Staging repo:
  https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-023/
  
  Staging site: (Sync pending)
  http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-surefire-plugin-2.7/
  http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-failsafe-plugin-2.7/
  http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-surefire-report-plugin-2.7/
  http://maven.apache.org/surefire/staging/
  
  
  Guide to testing staged releases:
  http://maven.apache.org/guides/development/guide-testing-releases.html
  
  Vote open for 72 hours.
  
  [ ] +1
  [ ] +0
  [ ] -1
  
  And here's my +1
  
  Kristian
  
  
  
  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
  For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
  
 
 
 



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



Regarding maven 3 integration with Hudson

2010-12-15 Thread amit pugalia
Hi,

I'm facing issues when using Maven 3 with latest build of Hudson.
The maven plugin doesn't seem to be compatible with Maven 3.
It throws errors as,

C:\hudson1\home\plugins\maven-plugin\WEB-INF\lib\maven-interceptor-1.389.jar
52039

Exception in thread main java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.getWorld()Lorg/codehaus/classworlds/ClassWorld;
at hudson.maven.agent.Main.main(Main.java:115) at
hudson.maven.agent.Main.main(Main.java:62)
ERROR: Failed to launch Maven. Exit code = 1

I tried building a Free Style Project on the same but still facing issues.
Do we have a solution, please help.

Thanks,
Amit Pugalia.


Re: Regarding maven 3 integration with Hudson

2010-12-15 Thread Yossi Shaul
Artifactory plugin for
Hudsonhttp://wiki.hudson-ci.org/display/HUDSON/Artifactory+Pluginsupports
Maven 3 builds (as free style projects).
You can use it even if you're not using Artifactory.

Yossi

On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 07:32, amit pugalia amit.puga...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi,

 I'm facing issues when using Maven 3 with latest build of Hudson.
 The maven plugin doesn't seem to be compatible with Maven 3.
 It throws errors as,


 C:\hudson1\home\plugins\maven-plugin\WEB-INF\lib\maven-interceptor-1.389.jar
 52039

 Exception in thread main java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:

 org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.getWorld()Lorg/codehaus/classworlds/ClassWorld;
 at hudson.maven.agent.Main.main(Main.java:115) at
 hudson.maven.agent.Main.main(Main.java:62)
 ERROR: Failed to launch Maven. Exit code = 1

 I tried building a Free Style Project on the same but still facing issues.
 Do we have a solution, please help.

 Thanks,
 Amit Pugalia.



Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.7 - No problem found, vote is still on

2010-12-15 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
PEBKAC of the slightly embarrasing sort on my end.

So the vote is on; happy testing!

Kristian



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.7

2010-12-15 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
Sorry for chatting on the vote thread here, but fixing the TeeStream
memory leak probably also has a noticeable performance impact for users
with large numbers of tests and/or lots of console output;

It turned out for test number N, any stdout/stderr output would be
duplicated into N tee-streams, and they were'nt going away. 
That's a lot of memory going nowhere.

Kristian

on., 15.12.2010 kl. 08.g08 -0600, skrev Jeff Jensen:
 +1 (non-binding)
 
 We can finally run a full build with tests from the parent with this
 version (would OOM unless -Xmx was set to nearly 2G!).  :-)
 
 
 On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 2:01 AM, chemit che...@codelutin.com wrote:
  On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 00:21:49 +0100
  Kristian Rosenvold kristian.rosenv...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  +1 (none binding)
 
  Works fine on our project.
 
  Thanks!
 
  Highlights of the release:
  * Pluggable providers are now supported, as well as manual provider
  selection
  * 2.7 is significantly smaller and lighter than earlier 2.x versions
  (Only 30% of the download size)
  * A large chunk of the highest voted issues have been fixed.
  * Some performance optimizations for forkMode=always
  * Significant cleanup/simplification of the code-base
 
 
  We solved 22 issues:
  http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10541version=16691
 
  There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
  http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=truemode=hidejqlQuery=project+%3D+SUREFIRE+AND+resolution+%3D+Unresolved+ORDER+BY+updated+DESC
 
  Staging repo:
  https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-023/
 
  Staging site: (Sync pending)
  http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-surefire-plugin-2.7/
  http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-failsafe-plugin-2.7/
  http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-surefire-report-plugin-2.7/
  http://maven.apache.org/surefire/staging/
 
 
  Guide to testing staged releases:
  http://maven.apache.org/guides/development/guide-testing-releases.html
 
  Vote open for 72 hours.
 
  [ ] +1
  [ ] +0
  [ ] -1
 
  And here's my +1
 
  Kristian
 
 
 
  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
  For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
 
 
 
 
  --
  Tony Chemit
  
  tél: +33 (0) 2 40 50 29 28
  email: che...@codelutin.com
  http://www.codelutin.com
 
  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
  For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
 
 
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
 



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.7

2010-12-15 Thread Jeff Jensen
Which clearly explains why, if we reduced the logging output level
from DEBUG to WARN, the OOM did not occur with smaller values of -Xmx.
 That was baffling at the time...  Wonderful fix.  Thanks!  :-)  (this
problem was the worst for release via parent pom; not happy to
-DskipTests on release or ignore uncommitted local changes!)


On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 8:21 AM, Kristian Rosenvold
kristian.rosenv...@gmail.com wrote:
 Sorry for chatting on the vote thread here, but fixing the TeeStream
 memory leak probably also has a noticeable performance impact for users
 with large numbers of tests and/or lots of console output;

 It turned out for test number N, any stdout/stderr output would be
 duplicated into N tee-streams, and they were'nt going away.
 That's a lot of memory going nowhere.

 Kristian

 on., 15.12.2010 kl. 08.g08 -0600, skrev Jeff Jensen:
 +1 (non-binding)

 We can finally run a full build with tests from the parent with this
 version (would OOM unless -Xmx was set to nearly 2G!).  :-)


 On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 2:01 AM, chemit che...@codelutin.com wrote:
  On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 00:21:49 +0100
  Kristian Rosenvold kristian.rosenv...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  +1 (none binding)
 
  Works fine on our project.
 
  Thanks!
 
  Highlights of the release:
  * Pluggable providers are now supported, as well as manual provider
  selection
  * 2.7 is significantly smaller and lighter than earlier 2.x versions
  (Only 30% of the download size)
  * A large chunk of the highest voted issues have been fixed.
  * Some performance optimizations for forkMode=always
  * Significant cleanup/simplification of the code-base
 
 
  We solved 22 issues:
  http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10541version=16691
 
  There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
  http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=truemode=hidejqlQuery=project+%3D+SUREFIRE+AND+resolution+%3D+Unresolved+ORDER+BY+updated+DESC
 
  Staging repo:
  https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-023/
 
  Staging site: (Sync pending)
  http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-surefire-plugin-2.7/
  http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-failsafe-plugin-2.7/
  http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-surefire-report-plugin-2.7/
  http://maven.apache.org/surefire/staging/
 
 
  Guide to testing staged releases:
  http://maven.apache.org/guides/development/guide-testing-releases.html
 
  Vote open for 72 hours.
 
  [ ] +1
  [ ] +0
  [ ] -1
 
  And here's my +1
 
  Kristian
 
 
 
  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
  For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
 
 
 
 
  --
  Tony Chemit
  
  tél: +33 (0) 2 40 50 29 28
  email: che...@codelutin.com
  http://www.codelutin.com
 
  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
  For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
 
 
 

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org




 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



[VOTE] Move Maven Changes Plugin to Java 5

2010-12-15 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Hi

I have some features I'd like to work on for the Changes Plugin. To
simplify the work I would like to start using Java 5 features, such as
generics for collections.

The last release was version 2.3 and after that no issues have been
fixed, so I don't see a reason to make a last Java 1.4 release of the
current trunk.


[ ] +1  Go for it
[ ] -1  Don't do it

-- 
Dennis Lundberg

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Move Maven Changes Plugin to Java 5

2010-12-15 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
+1

Den 15. des. 2010 kl. 20:26 skrev Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org:

 Hi

 I have some features I'd like to work on for the Changes Plugin. To
 simplify the work I would like to start using Java 5 features, such as
 generics for collections.

 The last release was version 2.3 and after that no issues have been
 fixed, so I don't see a reason to make a last Java 1.4 release of the
 current trunk.


 [ ] +1  Go for it
 [ ] -1  Don't do it

 --
 Dennis Lundberg

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Move Maven Changes Plugin to Java 5

2010-12-15 Thread Benjamin Bentmann

Dennis Lundberg wrote:


I have some features I'd like to work on for the Changes Plugin. To
simplify the work I would like to start using Java 5 features [...]


+1


Benjamin

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



Maven mirror status/problem

2010-12-15 Thread Jörg Hohwiller
Hi there,

some people recommend to use a mirror for maven. Others are required to as
their IP address has been blacklisted so they can not reach central
(repo1.maven.org) anymore.

From what I know mirrors are listed here:

http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVENUSER/Mirrors+Repositories

My feedback on this:

1. http://ftp.cica.es/mirrors/maven2
last_updated.txt: Sat Jan  9 20:15:40 CST 2010
That is pretty outdated...

2. http://repo1.sonatype.net/maven2
Does not work. I get always get 404.

3. http://repo.exist.com/maven2/
last_updated.txt: Tue Nov 23 22:30:45 CST 2010
Not up-to-date...

4. http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2
last_updated.txt: Tue Nov 30 22:54:22 CST 2010
Not really up-to-date...

5. http://www.ibiblio.net/pub/packages/maven2
Is always redirecting to
http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2

6. http://mirrors.redv.com/maven2
I get 403 - maybe only visible in china...

7. http://mirrors.dotsrc.org/maven
Does not work. I get always get 404.

8. http://mirrors.sunsite.dk/maven2
Does not work. I get always get 404.

9. http://mirror.netcologne.de/maven2
last_updated.txt: Tue Nov 30 22:54:22 CST 2010
Not really up-to-date...

I do not know what you actually expect from a mirror,
but in other universes (e.g. linux) a real mirror is usually
never older than 2 days.

Of course nobody owns the maven community anything and
everybody can start his own mirror.
However banning people from central in this case seems to
be a hard punishment and there should be some process to get
out of this again.

I can perfectly access central but I have some friends that have been
blacklisted.

If someone can confirm the errors with the mirrors sending
404, we can at least remove them from the wiki page.

Maybe also the sync of the outdated mirrors has been broken
for some reason and someone can check this.

Thanks
  Jörg

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



Re: Maven mirror status/problem

2010-12-15 Thread Jason van Zyl
The two that will always work are:

http://uk.maven.org/maven2/

and

http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/

Scrapers will definitely get blocked and stay blocked. But no normal user stays 
blocked if they inadvertently hit the tripwires. Only takes a short 
conversation, proving that the activity which caused getting banned was 
accidental or unintentional.

We, Sonatype, are looking at setting up a third mirror but it doesn't seem to 
be necessary at this point in time.

On Dec 15, 2010, at 3:32 PM, Jörg Hohwiller wrote:

 Hi there,
 
 some people recommend to use a mirror for maven. Others are required to as
 their IP address has been blacklisted so they can not reach central
 (repo1.maven.org) anymore.
 
 From what I know mirrors are listed here:
 
 http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVENUSER/Mirrors+Repositories
 
 My feedback on this:
 
 1. http://ftp.cica.es/mirrors/maven2
 last_updated.txt: Sat Jan  9 20:15:40 CST 2010
 That is pretty outdated...
 
 2. http://repo1.sonatype.net/maven2
 Does not work. I get always get 404.
 
 3. http://repo.exist.com/maven2/
 last_updated.txt: Tue Nov 23 22:30:45 CST 2010
 Not up-to-date...
 
 4. http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2
 last_updated.txt: Tue Nov 30 22:54:22 CST 2010
 Not really up-to-date...
 
 5. http://www.ibiblio.net/pub/packages/maven2
 Is always redirecting to
 http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2
 
 6. http://mirrors.redv.com/maven2
 I get 403 - maybe only visible in china...
 
 7. http://mirrors.dotsrc.org/maven
 Does not work. I get always get 404.
 
 8. http://mirrors.sunsite.dk/maven2
 Does not work. I get always get 404.
 
 9. http://mirror.netcologne.de/maven2
 last_updated.txt: Tue Nov 30 22:54:22 CST 2010
 Not really up-to-date...
 
 I do not know what you actually expect from a mirror,
 but in other universes (e.g. linux) a real mirror is usually
 never older than 2 days.
 
 Of course nobody owns the maven community anything and
 everybody can start his own mirror.
 However banning people from central in this case seems to
 be a hard punishment and there should be some process to get
 out of this again.
 
 I can perfectly access central but I have some friends that have been
 blacklisted.
 
 If someone can confirm the errors with the mirrors sending
 404, we can at least remove them from the wiki page.
 
 Maybe also the sync of the outdated mirrors has been broken
 for some reason and someone can check this.
 
 Thanks
  Jörg
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
 

Thanks,

Jason

--
Jason van Zyl
Founder,  Apache Maven
http://twitter.com/jvanzyl
-

You are never dedicated to something you have complete confidence in.
No one is fanatically shouting that the sun is going to rise tomorrow.
They know it is going to rise tomorrow. When people are fanatically
dedicated to political or religious faiths or any other kind of 
dogmas or goals, it's always because these dogmas or
goals are in doubt.

  -- Robert Pirzig, Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance





Re: Maven mirror status/problem

2010-12-15 Thread Ersin ER
Hi,

I guess I am one of those scrapers. Could you please tell me how can I get
all pom files stored in the central repository? (I just need them for
research.) Should I setup a mirror? If so how can I do so?

Thanks.

On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 22:52, Jason van Zyl ja...@maven.org wrote:

 The two that will always work are:

 http://uk.maven.org/maven2/

 and

 http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/

 Scrapers will definitely get blocked and stay blocked. But no normal user
 stays blocked if they inadvertently hit the tripwires. Only takes a short
 conversation, proving that the activity which caused getting banned was
 accidental or unintentional.

 We, Sonatype, are looking at setting up a third mirror but it doesn't seem
 to be necessary at this point in time.

 On Dec 15, 2010, at 3:32 PM, Jörg Hohwiller wrote:

  Hi there,
 
  some people recommend to use a mirror for maven. Others are required to
 as
  their IP address has been blacklisted so they can not reach central
  (repo1.maven.org) anymore.
 
  From what I know mirrors are listed here:
 
  http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVENUSER/Mirrors+Repositories
 
  My feedback on this:
 
  1. http://ftp.cica.es/mirrors/maven2
  last_updated.txt: Sat Jan  9 20:15:40 CST 2010
  That is pretty outdated...
 
  2. http://repo1.sonatype.net/maven2
  Does not work. I get always get 404.
 
  3. http://repo.exist.com/maven2/
  last_updated.txt: Tue Nov 23 22:30:45 CST 2010
  Not up-to-date...
 
  4. http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2
  last_updated.txt: Tue Nov 30 22:54:22 CST 2010
  Not really up-to-date...
 
  5. http://www.ibiblio.net/pub/packages/maven2
  Is always redirecting to
  http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2
 
  6. http://mirrors.redv.com/maven2
  I get 403 - maybe only visible in china...
 
  7. http://mirrors.dotsrc.org/maven
  Does not work. I get always get 404.
 
  8. http://mirrors.sunsite.dk/maven2
  Does not work. I get always get 404.
 
  9. http://mirror.netcologne.de/maven2
  last_updated.txt: Tue Nov 30 22:54:22 CST 2010
  Not really up-to-date...
 
  I do not know what you actually expect from a mirror,
  but in other universes (e.g. linux) a real mirror is usually
  never older than 2 days.
 
  Of course nobody owns the maven community anything and
  everybody can start his own mirror.
  However banning people from central in this case seems to
  be a hard punishment and there should be some process to get
  out of this again.
 
  I can perfectly access central but I have some friends that have been
  blacklisted.
 
  If someone can confirm the errors with the mirrors sending
  404, we can at least remove them from the wiki page.
 
  Maybe also the sync of the outdated mirrors has been broken
  for some reason and someone can check this.
 
  Thanks
   Jörg
 
  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
  For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
 

 Thanks,

 Jason

 --
 Jason van Zyl
 Founder,  Apache Maven
 http://twitter.com/jvanzyl
 -

 You are never dedicated to something you have complete confidence in.
 No one is fanatically shouting that the sun is going to rise tomorrow.
 They know it is going to rise tomorrow. When people are fanatically
 dedicated to political or religious faiths or any other kind of
 dogmas or goals, it's always because these dogmas or
 goals are in doubt.

  -- Robert Pirzig, Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance






-- 
Ersin Er


Re: [VOTE] Move Maven Changes Plugin to Java 5

2010-12-15 Thread Baptiste MATHUS
+1 (non-binding).

Let's kill Merlin, HopperMantis in the same shoot! :-).
Cheers

2010/12/15 Kristian Rosenvold kristian.rosenv...@gmail.com

 +1

 Den 15. des. 2010 kl. 20:26 skrev Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org:

  Hi
 
  I have some features I'd like to work on for the Changes Plugin. To
  simplify the work I would like to start using Java 5 features, such as
  generics for collections.
 
  The last release was version 2.3 and after that no issues have been
  fixed, so I don't see a reason to make a last Java 1.4 release of the
  current trunk.
 
 
  [ ] +1  Go for it
  [ ] -1  Don't do it
 
  --
  Dennis Lundberg
 
  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
  For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
 

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org




-- 
Baptiste Batmat MATHUS - http://batmat.net
Sauvez un arbre,
Mangez un castor !


[VOTE] Establish a creation and retirement plan for plugins

2010-12-15 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Hi

No one objected to the proposal I made on November 1. Jason and I have
polished the proposal based on the comments that were made. The final
(?) version can be found here:

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Proposal+--+A+creation+and+retirement+plan+for+plugins

Please vote on whether we should make this proposal our policy.

[ ] +1  Let's use it
[ ] -1  No way


If the vote succeeds I'll put it on the Maven site somewhere.
Suggestions on where to put are welcome.

-- 
Dennis Lundberg

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Establish a creation and retirement plan for plugins

2010-12-15 Thread Jesse Farinacci
Greetings,

On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org wrote:

 https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Proposal+--+A+creation+and+retirement+plan+for+plugins

From the proposal:

2. Make one final release of the plugin before it is retired. This
allows us to make a clean break. The final release must change the POM
so that SCM URLs are removed or changed to reflect the decision made
in the vote. If the plugin is moved elsewhere a prominent notice must
be placed on the front page of the plugin's site. The person who wants
to retire a plugin is the one who does the final release.

This seems wrong to me. Why would we make a final release from the
official Maven forge and yet have an SCM which points somewhere else?
This seems really misleading; certainly more-so than a future user
going to the (now defunct) SCM and not finding the plugin and having
to do some enlightenment work about where the release is now.

I'm not even sure the m-release-p could technically handle such a thing.

-Jesse

-- 
There are 10 types of people in this world, those
that can read binary and those that can not.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Establish a creation and retirement plan for plugins

2010-12-15 Thread Benson Margulies

 2. Make one final release of the plugin before it is retired. This
 allows us to make a clean break. The final release must change the POM
 so that SCM URLs are removed or changed to reflect the decision made
 in the vote. If the plugin is moved elsewhere a prominent notice must
 be placed on the front page of the plugin's site. The person who wants
 to retire a plugin is the one who does the final release.

 This seems wrong to me. Why would we make a final release from the
 official Maven forge and yet have an SCM which points somewhere else?
 This seems really misleading; certainly more-so than a future user
 going to the (now defunct) SCM and not finding the plugin and having
 to do some enlightenment work about where the release is now.

 I'm not even sure the m-release-p could technically handle such a thing.

Amplfication: The typical m-r-p-published POM points to the tag: the
place in SCM to find the exact source that the release was built from.
That still seems like exactly the right place for the final release
scm tag to point. Perhaps putting an explanation in the description/
of the new home (if any) would be more helpful?

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



Re: Maven mirror status/problem

2010-12-15 Thread Brett Porter

On 16/12/2010, at 7:32 AM, Jörg Hohwiller wrote:

 3. http://repo.exist.com/maven2/
 last_updated.txt: Tue Nov 23 22:30:45 CST 2010
 Not up-to-date...
 
 4. http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2
 last_updated.txt: Tue Nov 30 22:54:22 CST 2010
 Not really up-to-date...

These two were kept officially up to date before, being pushed from the main 
content box. I think the others pulled from ibiblio, but as you've seen most 
went out of service.

Brian, can you tell me why the first sync is not working again (we fixed it 
just days before that)? I meant to set up a monitor afterwards... but can you 
make it email me whenever there's a failure? I'd turned that off, but since we 
no longer have any access I need to know why it's failing in case it's 
something I can still fix on the other end.

- Brett

--
Brett Porter
br...@apache.org
http://brettporter.wordpress.com/
http://au.linkedin.com/in/brettporter





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Establish a creation and retirement plan for plugins

2010-12-15 Thread Dennis Lundberg
On 2010-12-15 23:03, Jesse Farinacci wrote:
 Greetings,
 
 On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org wrote:

 https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Proposal+--+A+creation+and+retirement+plan+for+plugins
 
From the proposal:
 
 2. Make one final release of the plugin before it is retired. This
 allows us to make a clean break. The final release must change the POM
 so that SCM URLs are removed or changed to reflect the decision made
 in the vote. If the plugin is moved elsewhere a prominent notice must
 be placed on the front page of the plugin's site. The person who wants
 to retire a plugin is the one who does the final release.
 
 This seems wrong to me. Why would we make a final release from the
 official Maven forge and yet have an SCM which points somewhere else?
 This seems really misleading; certainly more-so than a future user
 going to the (now defunct) SCM and not finding the plugin and having
 to do some enlightenment work about where the release is now.

Right, removing the Source Repository *report* is probably the best way
to go.

 I'm not even sure the m-release-p could technically handle such a thing.
 
 -Jesse
 


-- 
Dennis Lundberg

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



Re: Maven mirror status/problem

2010-12-15 Thread Brian Fox
That page is garbage and should be dumped. The official list is
maintained in the repo itself:
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/.meta/repository-metadata.xml


On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Jörg Hohwiller jo...@j-hohwiller.de wrote:
 Hi there,

 some people recommend to use a mirror for maven. Others are required to as
 their IP address has been blacklisted so they can not reach central
 (repo1.maven.org) anymore.

 From what I know mirrors are listed here:

 http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVENUSER/Mirrors+Repositories

 My feedback on this:

 1. http://ftp.cica.es/mirrors/maven2
 last_updated.txt: Sat Jan  9 20:15:40 CST 2010
 That is pretty outdated...

 2. http://repo1.sonatype.net/maven2
 Does not work. I get always get 404.

 3. http://repo.exist.com/maven2/
 last_updated.txt: Tue Nov 23 22:30:45 CST 2010
 Not up-to-date...

 4. http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2
 last_updated.txt: Tue Nov 30 22:54:22 CST 2010
 Not really up-to-date...

 5. http://www.ibiblio.net/pub/packages/maven2
 Is always redirecting to
 http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2

 6. http://mirrors.redv.com/maven2
 I get 403 - maybe only visible in china...

 7. http://mirrors.dotsrc.org/maven
 Does not work. I get always get 404.

 8. http://mirrors.sunsite.dk/maven2
 Does not work. I get always get 404.

 9. http://mirror.netcologne.de/maven2
 last_updated.txt: Tue Nov 30 22:54:22 CST 2010
 Not really up-to-date...

 I do not know what you actually expect from a mirror,
 but in other universes (e.g. linux) a real mirror is usually
 never older than 2 days.

 Of course nobody owns the maven community anything and
 everybody can start his own mirror.
 However banning people from central in this case seems to
 be a hard punishment and there should be some process to get
 out of this again.

 I can perfectly access central but I have some friends that have been
 blacklisted.

 If someone can confirm the errors with the mirrors sending
 404, we can at least remove them from the wiki page.

 Maybe also the sync of the outdated mirrors has been broken
 for some reason and someone can check this.

 Thanks
  Jörg

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Establish a creation and retirement plan for plugins

2010-12-15 Thread Brett Porter

On 16/12/2010, at 10:00 AM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:

 On 2010-12-15 23:03, Jesse Farinacci wrote:
 Greetings,
 
 On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org wrote:
 
 https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Proposal+--+A+creation+and+retirement+plan+for+plugins
 
 From the proposal:
 
 2. Make one final release of the plugin before it is retired. This
 allows us to make a clean break. The final release must change the POM
 so that SCM URLs are removed or changed to reflect the decision made
 in the vote. If the plugin is moved elsewhere a prominent notice must
 be placed on the front page of the plugin's site. The person who wants
 to retire a plugin is the one who does the final release.
 
 This seems wrong to me. Why would we make a final release from the
 official Maven forge and yet have an SCM which points somewhere else?
 This seems really misleading; certainly more-so than a future user
 going to the (now defunct) SCM and not finding the plugin and having
 to do some enlightenment work about where the release is now.
 
 Right, removing the Source Repository *report* is probably the best way
 to go.

Agree.

I'd also make the release preferred but optional - there's a good chance you 
won't get the energy to do that if there's not energy to continue. It probably 
is on a case by case basis of how many changes have been made on trunk since 
and if they are valuable to release.

I think we can also now recommend apache-extras.org as a suitable forge along 
with mojo.

I'm +1 to the proposal with or without those changes.

- Brett

--
Brett Porter
br...@apache.org
http://brettporter.wordpress.com/
http://au.linkedin.com/in/brettporter





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



Re: Cleanup to SNAPSHOT version handling

2010-12-15 Thread Jörg Hohwiller
Hi there,

FYI:

I use SNAPSHOT as version for internal artifacts (site-configurations with
checkstyle, etc.) to denote that they will never get released.
However in such case one typically does not need real SNAPSHOT support by
maven. I could also name the version notversioned or 0.0.

Regards
  Jörg

 If x-SNAPSHOT.release() = x then SNAPSHOT.release()= npe or divide by
 zero, take your pick :)
 
 I always made sure to point out this anti-pattern during all the maven
 training classes I did.
 
 --mobile
 
 On Dec 13, 2010, at 6:42 AM, Benjamin Bentmann
 benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu wrote:
 
 Brett Porter wrote:

 [...] SNAPSHOT (with no leading version) was valid, but that behaviour 
 has long been (unofficially) deprecated.

 Do you have some more pointers for this deprecation handy?


 Benjamin

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



Re: Maven mirror status/problem

2010-12-15 Thread Jörg Hohwiller
 Hi,
Hi there,

 
 I guess I am one of those scrapers. Could you please tell me how can I get
 all pom files stored in the central repository? (I just need them for
 research.) Should I setup a mirror? If so how can I do so?

You can simply use a maven repository server such as nexus, artifactory or 
archiva.

However if you crawl the entire repository once it will not make a difference.
Only if you download the same artifacts multiple time the repository server will
act as proxy (like your local repo) to prevent repetitive downloads.
But downloading all pom files should be avoided within a short time.
Please use a delay to reduce the load and if possible use a mirror...

 
 Thanks.

Thanks for taking care
  Jörg

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



Re: Maven mirror status/problem

2010-12-15 Thread Jörg Hohwiller
Hi Brian,

 That page is garbage and should be dumped. The official list is
 maintained in the repo itself:
 http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/.meta/repository-metadata.xml
 

thanks for clarification.
I put the link on the wiki site as the wiki site itself is linked from various
other sites.

Regards
  Jörg

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



Re: Cleanup to SNAPSHOT version handling

2010-12-15 Thread Benson Margulies
Or, 1-SNAPSHOT.

Or, DO-NOT-RELEASE-1-SNAPSHOT

On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 6:33 PM, Jörg Hohwiller jo...@j-hohwiller.de wrote:
 Hi there,

 FYI:

 I use SNAPSHOT as version for internal artifacts (site-configurations with
 checkstyle, etc.) to denote that they will never get released.
 However in such case one typically does not need real SNAPSHOT support by
 maven. I could also name the version notversioned or 0.0.

 Regards
  Jörg

 If x-SNAPSHOT.release() = x then SNAPSHOT.release()= npe or divide by
 zero, take your pick :)

 I always made sure to point out this anti-pattern during all the maven
 training classes I did.

 --mobile

 On Dec 13, 2010, at 6:42 AM, Benjamin Bentmann
 benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu wrote:

 Brett Porter wrote:

 [...] SNAPSHOT (with no leading version) was valid, but that behaviour 
 has long been (unofficially) deprecated.

 Do you have some more pointers for this deprecation handy?


 Benjamin

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Establish a creation and retirement plan for plugins

2010-12-15 Thread Jason van Zyl

On Dec 15, 2010, at 4:52 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:

 Hi
 
 No one objected to the proposal I made on November 1. Jason and I have
 polished the proposal based on the comments that were made. The final
 (?) version can be found here:
 
 https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Proposal+--+A+creation+and+retirement+plan+for+plugins
 
 Please vote on whether we should make this proposal our policy.
 
 [ ] +1  Let's use it
 [ ] -1  No way
 
 

+1

 If the vote succeeds I'll put it on the Maven site somewhere.
 Suggestions on where to put are welcome.
 
 -- 
 Dennis Lundberg
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
 

Thanks,

Jason

--
Jason van Zyl
Founder,  Apache Maven
http://twitter.com/jvanzyl
-

the course of true love never did run smooth ...

 -- Shakespeare





Re: [VOTE] Establish a creation and retirement plan for plugins

2010-12-15 Thread Ralph Goers
I agree that the final release should be optional.  I would also add that the 
site must be updated to say the plugin is retired whether it is moved somewhere 
else or not.

Ralph

On Dec 15, 2010, at 3:17 PM, Brett Porter wrote:

 
 On 16/12/2010, at 10:00 AM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
 
 On 2010-12-15 23:03, Jesse Farinacci wrote:
 Greetings,
 
 On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org wrote:
 
 https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Proposal+--+A+creation+and+retirement+plan+for+plugins
 
 From the proposal:
 
 2. Make one final release of the plugin before it is retired. This
 allows us to make a clean break. The final release must change the POM
 so that SCM URLs are removed or changed to reflect the decision made
 in the vote. If the plugin is moved elsewhere a prominent notice must
 be placed on the front page of the plugin's site. The person who wants
 to retire a plugin is the one who does the final release.
 
 This seems wrong to me. Why would we make a final release from the
 official Maven forge and yet have an SCM which points somewhere else?
 This seems really misleading; certainly more-so than a future user
 going to the (now defunct) SCM and not finding the plugin and having
 to do some enlightenment work about where the release is now.
 
 Right, removing the Source Repository *report* is probably the best way
 to go.
 
 Agree.
 
 I'd also make the release preferred but optional - there's a good chance you 
 won't get the energy to do that if there's not energy to continue. It 
 probably is on a case by case basis of how many changes have been made on 
 trunk since and if they are valuable to release.
 
 I think we can also now recommend apache-extras.org as a suitable forge along 
 with mojo.
 
 I'm +1 to the proposal with or without those changes.
 
 - Brett
 
 --
 Brett Porter
 br...@apache.org
 http://brettporter.wordpress.com/
 http://au.linkedin.com/in/brettporter
 
 
 
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Move Maven Changes Plugin to Java 5

2010-12-15 Thread chemit
On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 20:25:24 +0100
Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org wrote:

 Hi
 
+1 (non binding)

 I have some features I'd like to work on for the Changes Plugin. To
 simplify the work I would like to start using Java 5 features, such as
 generics for collections.
 
 The last release was version 2.3 and after that no issues have been
 fixed, so I don't see a reason to make a last Java 1.4 release of the
 current trunk.
 
 
 [ ] +1  Go for it
 [ ] -1  Don't do it
 



-- 
Tony Chemit

tél: +33 (0) 2 40 50 29 28
email: che...@codelutin.com
http://www.codelutin.com

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.7

2010-12-15 Thread Lukas Theussl


+1

-Lukas

Kristian Rosenvold wrote:

Highlights of the release:
* Pluggable providers are now supported, as well as manual provider
selection
* 2.7 is significantly smaller and lighter than earlier 2.x versions
(Only 30% of the download size)
* A large chunk of the highest voted issues have been fixed.
* Some performance optimizations for forkMode=always
* Significant cleanup/simplification of the code-base


We solved 22 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10541version=16691

There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=truemode=hidejqlQuery=project+%3D+SUREFIRE+AND+resolution+%3D+Unresolved+ORDER+BY+updated+DESC

Staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-023/

Staging site: (Sync pending)
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-surefire-plugin-2.7/
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-failsafe-plugin-2.7/
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-surefire-report-plugin-2.7/
http://maven.apache.org/surefire/staging/


Guide to testing staged releases:
http://maven.apache.org/guides/development/guide-testing-releases.html

Vote open for 72 hours.

[ ] +1
[ ] +0
[ ] -1

And here's my +1

Kristian



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Move Maven Changes Plugin to Java 5

2010-12-15 Thread Lukas Theussl


+1

-Lukas


Dennis Lundberg wrote:

Hi

I have some features I'd like to work on for the Changes Plugin. To
simplify the work I would like to start using Java 5 features, such as
generics for collections.

The last release was version 2.3 and after that no issues have been
fixed, so I don't see a reason to make a last Java 1.4 release of the
current trunk.


[ ] +1  Go for it
[ ] -1  Don't do it



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Establish a creation and retirement plan for plugins

2010-12-15 Thread Lukas Theussl


+1 for the retirement part of the proposal but I'm a bit confused about 
icluding a creation plan (I haven't followed the discussion up to now 
though).


The current procedure for adding new plugins IIRC is to first put it in 
the sandbox and then call a vote to promote it out of there. Is this 
meant to be made obsolete?


-Lukas


Dennis Lundberg wrote:

Hi

No one objected to the proposal I made on November 1. Jason and I have
polished the proposal based on the comments that were made. The final
(?) version can be found here:

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Proposal+--+A+creation+and+retirement+plan+for+plugins

Please vote on whether we should make this proposal our policy.

[ ] +1  Let's use it
[ ] -1  No way


If the vote succeeds I'll put it on the Maven site somewhere.
Suggestions on where to put are welcome.



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org