Re: Releases, Continuous Delivery and the Future

2014-12-28 Thread Brian E. Fox


 On Dec 14, 2014, at 8:29 PM, Jason van Zyl ja...@takari.io wrote:
 
 What we want is a form of continuous delivery where a version like 3.2.4 is 
 the version that we call it to the outside world (some refer to it as the 
 marketing version) and the qualifier changes from build to build so we have:
 
 3.2.4-qualifier
 
 And for simplicity's sake let's just say the qualifier is a build number so 
 we end up with:
 
 3.2.4-01
 3.2.4-02
 ...
 3.2.4-NN

+1

This really the only viable scheme I've seen used over the years. It's how we 
do it at Sonatype and it's never been an issue that the public version is shown 
with some -build number. 

We will want to ensure that only one release version gets published though to 
reduce confusion. Since everything is staged, this should happen normally.

For plugins, which are commonly referred to by users in their poms, this might 
turn out to be a problem as it increases the maintenance load but I think we 
start trying it and if there is an issue we go to an alternate approach.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



Re: Central and Man-in-the-middle

2014-07-30 Thread Brian E. Fox
http://blog.sonatype.com/2014/07/ssl_connectivity_for_central/

--Brian (mobile)


 On Jul 28, 2014, at 11:06 PM, Brian Fox bri...@infinity.nu wrote:
 
 We are already in the process of making this open for free to
 everyone. Way back in 2012 the CDN situation was different but we just
 renewed the contract and and ssl is part of it. Once this is setup, we
 should consider changing the superpom to use ssl by default.
 
 Obviously doing something to validate pgp signatures is even better.
 
 On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 10:14 PM, Mark Derricutt m...@talios.com wrote:
 Hey all,
 
 Just been reading [1] after it was mentioned in both #scala and #clojure on
 irc.freenode.org now, is there anything that can be done to alleviate some
 of these issues?
 
 oss.sonatype.org now requires everything to be GPG signed before being
 uploaded to central, but I'm not sure about any of the other means of
 getting artifacts uploaded.
 
 Are there any plugins out there to verify GPG signings of dependencies?
 
 Something to discuss on the dev-hangout maybe?
 
 
 [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8099713
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
 


Re: [VOTE] ASF Parent pom 13 and Maven parent pom 23

2013-01-18 Thread Brian E. Fox
+1

--Brian (mobile)


On Jan 17, 2013, at 3:17 PM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:

 Hi,
 I'd like to release both ASF Parent pom 13 and Maven parent pom 23
 
 ASF Parent pom 13:
 * staging repository:
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheapache-142/
 * diff with previous release:
 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/pom/tags/apache-13/pom.xml?r1=HEADr2=1404788diff_format=h
 
 Maven Parent pom 23:
 * staging repository:
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-143/
 * diff with previous release:
 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/pom/tags/maven-parent-23/pom.xml?r1=HEADr2=1371599diff_format=h
 
 Vote open for 72H
 [+1]
 [0]
 [-1]
 
 Thanks
 --
 Olivier Lamy
 Talend: http://coders.talend.com
 http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



Re: Maven Central is probably blocked in China

2012-07-09 Thread Brian E. Fox
Hi Nicolas, this isn't intentional of course. Let me see what I can dig up 
based in your traces.

--Brian (mobile)


On Jul 7, 2012, at 11:45 PM, Niclas Hedhman nic...@hedhman.org wrote:

 (I am not subscribed, so please CC me on any responses)
 
 I live in China. I normally have a VPN enabled to circumvent various
 blocking (YouTube, Twitter, ++) that the Chinese government has in
 place. I normally don't think much about it. But, today I had my
 computer rebooted and couldn't build a project, because Maven Central
 couldn't be reached.
 
 So, before I realized that my VPN wasn't running I tracerouted a bit.
 
 repo1 resolved to
 
 niclas:~ niclas$ dig repo1.maven.org | grep ^[a-z]
 repo1.maven.org.1751INCNAMEcentral.maven.org.
 central.maven.org.212INCNAMEcentral02.maven.org.
 central02.maven.org.7112INCNAMEwpc.829D.edgecastcdn.net.
 wpc.829D.edgecastcdn.net. 3164INCNAMEgs1.wpc.edgecastcdn.net.
 gs1.wpc.edgecastcdn.net. 2292INA68.232.45.253
 
 and from that I also tried central01
 
 niclas:~ niclas$ dig central01.maven.org | grep ^[a-z]
 central01.maven.org.6477INCNAME
 central01.maven.org.edgesuite.net.
 central01.maven.org.edgesuite.net. 20877 IN CNAME a978.g1.akamai.net.
 a978.g1.akamai.net.4INA124.40.42.31
 a978.g1.akamai.net.4INA124.40.42.6
 
 And with tracerouting both (see below), it struck me that VPN might
 not be enabled and the IP on edgecastcdn.net is probably blocked by
 China potentially serving something they don't like, could be
 anything... Yeah, China is BAD, we all know that, but shouldn't we
 (Apache) try to minimize the problem for your ordinary Chinese
 developer, could be a student, hobbyist, small entrepreneur and so on,
 who isn't anti-government (most people here are quite content with the
 government) to be able to use Apache projects?
 
 The fact is now, that without reasonably reliable access to Maven
 Central, one can not really participate in many, many of the Java
 projects at ASF.
 
 I don't know how the DNS and host resolution is supposed to work, who
 is participating in the hosting and under what terms. But I think
 Maven/Sonatype should have in its interest to NOT EXCLUDE some
 staggering amount of Java programmers, and perhaps try to find a way
 to get a better SLA here. If you need help from someone to check from
 the inside the Great Firewall, just let me know...
 
 
 Cheers
 Niclas
 
 
 traceroute to gs1.wpc.edgecastcdn.net (68.232.45.253), 64 hops max, 52
 byte packets
 1  192.168.2.1 (192.168.2.1)  1.446 ms  0.980 ms  0.900 ms
 2  58.246.152.1 (58.246.152.1)  9.855 ms  11.724 ms  8.662 ms
 3  210.22.67.29 (210.22.67.29)  9.563 ms  3.698 ms  1.712 ms
 4  112.64.251.165 (112.64.251.165)  1.696 ms  1.819 ms  3.215 ms
 5  * * *
 6  * * *
 7  * * *
 8  * * *
 9  * * *
 10  * * *
 11  * * *
 12  * * *
 13  * * *
 14  * * *
 15  * * *
 16  * * *
 17  * * *
 
 
 niclas:qi4j-sdk niclas$ traceroute  central01.maven.org
 traceroute: Warning: central01.maven.org has multiple addresses; using
 209.107.203.19
 traceroute to a978.g1.akamai.net (209.107.203.19), 64 hops max, 52 byte 
 packets
 1  192.168.2.1 (192.168.2.1)  1.681 ms  0.910 ms  0.889 ms
 2  58.246.152.1 (58.246.152.1)  14.958 ms  14.339 ms  115.382 ms
 3  112.64.251.133 (112.64.251.133)  3.516 ms  2.892 ms  1.682 ms
 4  112.64.251.165 (112.64.251.165)  2.117 ms  1.934 ms  1.926 ms
 5  112.64.243.170 (112.64.243.170)  3.859 ms  8.432 ms  4.110 ms
 6  * * *
 7  219.158.9.209 (219.158.9.209)  4.284 ms  3.517 ms  6.284 ms
 8  219.158.100.194 (219.158.100.194)  32.392 ms  34.428 ms  32.079 ms
 9  219.158.96.230 (219.158.96.230)  33.214 ms  33.501 ms  33.470 ms
 10  219.158.96.222 (219.158.96.222)  31.660 ms  31.564 ms  33.370 ms
 11  sl-st30-sj-0-4-3-3.sprintlink.net (144.228.111.29)  214.116 ms
 466.648 ms  503.740 ms
 12  sl-st31-sj-0-12-0-3.sprintlink.net (144.232.3.33)  180.679 ms
sl-st31-sj-0-8-0-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.3.29)  214.923 ms  231.186 ms
 13  144.232.8.194 (144.232.8.194)  522.103 ms  381.628 ms  221.618 ms
 14  te0-0-0-3.ccr22.sjc01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.6.109)  219.036 ms
te0-3-0-3.ccr22.sjc01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.6.101)  184.460 ms
te0-1-0-0.ccr21.sjc03.atlas.cogentco.com (66.28.4.53)  305.247 ms
 15  te0-3-0-2.ccr22.lax01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.2.149)  614.732 ms
te0-1-0-0.ccr21.sjc01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.83.253)  216.883 ms
te0-1-0-3.ccr21.sjc01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.6.237)  450.823 ms
 16  te9-3.ccr02.lax05.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.82.154)  662.795 ms
154.54.85.25 (154.54.85.25)  189.819 ms
te7-8.ccr02.lax05.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.30.198)  888.842 ms
 17  te4-1.mpd01.lax05.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.28.69)  693.184 ms
te9-6.mpd01.lax05.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.82.150)  190.542 ms *
 18  38.104.84.130 (38.104.84.130)  781.037 ms
38.104.84.126 (38.104.84.126)  425.045 ms
38.104.84.130 (38.104.84.130)  

Re: Cleanup to SNAPSHOT version handling

2010-12-28 Thread Brian E. Fox
-1 to a, +1 to b

--Brian (mobile)


On Dec 28, 2010, at 1:20 PM, Jason van Zyl ja...@maven.org wrote:

 
 On Dec 28, 2010, at 10:02 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
 
 Brett Porter wrote:
 
 I think the original reason the logic is how it is was because just 
 SNAPSHOT (with no leading version) was valid, but that behaviour has long 
 been (unofficially) deprecated.
 
 Given this style of versioning is apparently in use and I personally see 
 nothing wrong with having just SNAPSHOT to refer to the HEAD of some 
 project I suggest we go with the following for Maven 3.0.2:
 
 a) Treat SNAPSHOT, *-SNAPSHOT and the respective expanded/timestamped 
 forms as snapshot versions, anything else as release
 b) Emit a model warning if the project version ends with SNAPSHOT but does 
 not match the patterns mentioned in a)
 
 
 +1
 
 I think anything that moves us closer toward the OSGi versioning would be 
 better. I also think being more explicit with the version would be better and 
 accounts for the case where you have multiple branches and you need to 
 identify the tip of each. I don't think we should allow just SNAPSHOT 
 anymore as it provides no version context which I think is important. 
 
 We often see the following:
 
 x-SNAPSHOT
 x.y-SNAPSHOT
 x.y.z-SNAPSHOT
 
 Which at least provide some version context, but ultimately I think we should 
 try to move toward:
 
 http://www.osgi.org/javadoc/r4v42/org/osgi/framework/Version.html
 
 So I would opt for b) and emit a warning if not in the *-SNAPSHOT form and 
 officially deprecate SNAPSHOT and think about moving toward x.y.z.qualifier 
 as a standard. I don't think multiple version schemes are truly helpful.
 
 
 Benjamin
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
 
 
 Thanks,
 
 Jason
 
 --
 Jason van Zyl
 Founder,  Apache Maven
 http://twitter.com/jvanzyl
 -
 
 First, the taking in of scattered particulars under one Idea,
 so that everyone understands what is being talked about ... Second,
 the separation of the Idea into parts, by dividing it at the joints,
 as nature directs, not breaking any limb in half as a bad carver might.
 
  -- Plato, Phaedrus (Notes on the Synthesis of Form by C. Alexander)
 
 
 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



Re: Moving scm to java 1.5

2010-12-28 Thread Brian E. Fox
+1 since we moved that way for 2.2 and 3, I think we can safely move all of our 
cosebases to 1.6 as needed

--Brian (mobile)


On Dec 28, 2010, at 3:15 PM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:

 Hi,
 As we will start a new year, I'd like to move scm to java 1.5.
 Let me know if you have any trouble regarding this . (jira entry
 http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SCM-591)
 
 Thanks,
 -- 
 Olivier Lamy
 http://twitter.com/olamy
 http://www.linkedin.com/in/olamy
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



Re: How do I get the MavenProject objects of already built modules?

2010-12-20 Thread Brian E. Fox
Do you need @aggregator to make sure the reactorProjects is properly populated?

--Brian (mobile)


On Dec 20, 2010, at 12:18 PM, Benjamin Bentmann benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu 
wrote:

 Bernd Vogt wrote:
 
 when implementing a Mojo (Maven 3), how do I get the MavenProject
 objects of the modules that were already built by the current reactor
 build?
 
 Sounds either like
 
 /** @parameter default-value=${reactorProjects} */
 CollectionMavenProject projects;
 
 or http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-4943.
 
 
 Benjamin
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



Re: Maven Archetpyes structure

2010-05-06 Thread Brian E. Fox
Don't go back to a lower version in the parent unless you change one  
if the other coords like the artifactid. This causes sorting issues  
when the metadata needs to be rebuilt.


--Brian (mobile)


On May 6, 2010, at 4:29 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY herve.bout...@free.fr  
wrote:



ok
i'll do the svn update and open a Xircles chord to create ARCHETYPES  
project


Regards,

Hervé

Le samedi 01 mai 2010, Hervé BOUTEMY a écrit :
After releasing an alpha of Archetype components and some  
archetypes, it

becomes clear to me that the actual structure is not ideal.

I think that maven-archertype-bundles with all its modules (ie  
concrete
archetypes) should be a separate component, with its own trunk and  
Jira

project, and released as a unique Maven Archetype Bundles version
containing every archetypes.

Then I'd like to:
- move /maven/archetype/trunk/maven-archetype-bundles to
/maven/archetypes/trunk
- change to an overall 1.2-SNAPSHOT version (yes, actual parent pom  
is at
version 4, but I don't think that it is a problem since it is not  
used

directly)
- create MARCHETYPES Jira project, with one component per archetype  
(will

need help on this one, since I don't know how to do that)

WDYT?
Any objection?

Regards,

Hervé

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Compiler Plugin 2.3

2010-04-13 Thread Brian E. Fox

+1

--Brian (mobile)


On Apr 10, 2010, at 4:40 AM, Jason van Zyl ja...@sonatype.com wrote:


Hi,

This was simply to bump the default source/target to 1.5. I don't  
want 3.0-beta-1 released requiring people to set these as they  
should be defaults now.


Staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-011

All we fixed was this:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MCOMPILER-80

Guide to testing staged releases:
http://maven.apache.org/guides/development/guide-testing-releases.html

Vote open for 72 hours.

[ ] +1
[ ] +0
[ ] -1

+1 from me.

Thanks,

Jason

--
Jason van Zyl
Founder,  Apache Maven
http://twitter.com/jvanzyl
--



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Release MavenCheckstyle plugin version 2.5

2010-02-09 Thread Brian E. Fox

+1

--Brian (mobile)


On Feb 8, 2010, at 8:06 AM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:


Hi,
I'd like to release maven-checkstyle-plugin version 2.5.
It's a small release to make it working with maven 3.

We solved 1 issue:

http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MCHECKSTYLE-123

Staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-002/

Staging site:
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-checkstyle-plugin-2.5

Guide to testing staged releases:
http://maven.apache.org/guides/development/guide-testing-releases.html

Vote open for 72 hours.

[ ] +1
[ ] +0
[ ] -1

Thanks,
--
Olivier
http://twitter.com/olamy
http://fr.linkedin.com/in/olamy

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



Re: Pushing Maven 2.0.11

2009-11-20 Thread Brian E. Fox
All joking aside, 2.0.9 and 2.0.10 have proven to be very stable. We  
need to keep the same bar for 2.0.11 especially if we intend this to  
be the end of 2.0.x. That means we need lots of participation during  
the rc process.


--Brian (mobile)


On Nov 20, 2009, at 4:23 PM, Brett Porter br...@apache.org wrote:

Yes, it's been tagged a while too. I was planning to start the RC  
process today.


On 21/11/2009, at 8:04 AM, Michael wrote:


Hi folks,

all issues for Maven 2.0.11 have been closed since August [1].
Why hasn't this relese been pushed so far?


Thanks,

Mike

[1] 
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?sorter/field=updatedsorter/order=DESC

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



Re: Update on ASF Release requirements

2009-05-08 Thread Brian E. Fox
My plan is to implement the packaging in the maven pom and then later  
promote it to the apache pom once any kinks are worked out.


--Brian (mobile)


On May 8, 2009, at 8:17 PM, David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com wrote:

Could I ask what's going to happen after you get the assembly plugin  
improved?  Will there be an apache 7 pom or, how else would we get  
this new functionality?


thanks
david jencks

On May 7, 2009, at 8:13 PM, Brian E. Fox wrote:


I just need to finish the ITs.

--Brian (mobile)


On May 7, 2009, at 10:45 PM, Stephane Nicoll stephane.nic...@gmail.com 
 wrote:


On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 3:21 AM, Brett Porter br...@apache.org  
wrote:




On 05/05/2009, at 11:01 AM, Brian Fox wrote:

To make this happen relatively quickly, I'll take finish my patch  
by
adding tests, and then stage a release of the assembly plugin  
2.2-beta-3.1
by applying only this patch to the existing beta-3 tag so we can  
cut a
release without a bunch of hand wrangling over what needs to be  
fixed in

beta-4.

Any concerns or objections to the above plan?



Only the version. Release it as beta 4 using the approach above  
(or any

since committed fixes) and tell anyone that complains to go jump :)



+1

I was about to stage ear plugin 2.3.2 so I suppose I need to wait  
a bit.

Brian, what is the status of this one?

Thanks,
Stéphane





Cheers,
Brett


--- 
--

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org





--
Large Systems Suck: This rule is 100% transitive. If you build  
one, you

suck -- S.Yegge


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



Re: Update on ASF Release requirements

2009-05-07 Thread Brian E. Fox

I just need to finish the ITs.

--Brian (mobile)


On May 7, 2009, at 10:45 PM, Stephane Nicoll  
stephane.nic...@gmail.com wrote:



On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 3:21 AM, Brett Porter br...@apache.org wrote:



On 05/05/2009, at 11:01 AM, Brian Fox wrote:

To make this happen relatively quickly, I'll take finish my patch by
adding tests, and then stage a release of the assembly plugin 2.2- 
beta-3.1
by applying only this patch to the existing beta-3 tag so we can  
cut a
release without a bunch of hand wrangling over what needs to be  
fixed in

beta-4.

Any concerns or objections to the above plan?



Only the version. Release it as beta 4 using the approach above (or  
any

since committed fixes) and tell anyone that complains to go jump :)



+1

I was about to stage ear plugin 2.3.2 so I suppose I need to wait a  
bit.

Brian, what is the status of this one?

Thanks,
Stéphane





Cheers,
Brett


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org





--
Large Systems Suck: This rule is 100% transitive. If you build one,  
you

suck -- S.Yegge


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Archetype plugin version 2.0-alpha-5

2009-05-03 Thread Brian E. Fox
-1 we need to produce source archives for all releases based on the  
recent discussions on some other lists. I'm experimenting with some  
ways to make this inherited but for now you can bind the assembly  
plugin with the src descriptor to produce the correct zip of the  
sources.


--Brian (mobile)


On May 3, 2009, at 11:44 AM, Raphaël Piéroni raf...@apache.org  
wrote:



Hi,

We solved 11 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=14254styleName=HtmlprojectId=11095


There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=truepid=11095status=1


Staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-staging-003/

Staging site (currently syncing):
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-archetype-plugin-2.0-alpha-5/


Guide to testing staged releases:
http://maven.apache.org/guides/development/guide-testing-releases.html

Vote open for 72 hours.


[ ] +1
[ ] +0
[ ] -1


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



Re: Apache snapshot repository metadata incorrect.

2009-05-01 Thread Brian E. Fox

I will take a look shortly

--Brian (mobile)


On May 1, 2009, at 4:59 PM, Arnaud HERITIER aherit...@gmail.com wrote:

I'm not administrator to verify but perhaps, the job to fix metadata  
isn't

scheduled ?

On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Nord, James jn...@nds.com wrote:


Hi all,

The metadata served by nexus for http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/
is incorrect for the archetype plugin.

(https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/org/apache/maven
/plugins/maven-archetype-plugin/)

metadata contains lots of snapshot versions but only
2.0-alpha-5-SNAPSHOT is available.  (and hence running mvn
archetype:generate from the command line fails as it tries to get
12-SNAPSHOT

/James

?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8 ?
-
https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/org/apache/maven
/plugins/maven-archetype-plugin/maven-metadata.xml#  metadata
xsi:schemaLocation=http://maven.apache.org/METADATA/1.0.0
http://maven.apache.org/xsd/metadata-1.0.0.xsd;
xmlns=http://maven.apache.org/METADATA/1.0.0;
xmlns:xsi=http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance;
groupIdorg.apache.maven.plugins/groupId
artifactIdmaven-archetype-plugin/artifactId
version2.0-alpha-4-SNAPSHOT/version
-
https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/org/apache/maven
/plugins/maven-archetype-plugin/maven-metadata.xml#  versioning
latest12-SNAPSHOT/latest
release /
-
https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/org/apache/maven
/plugins/maven-archetype-plugin/maven-metadata.xml#  versions
version2.0-alpha-4-SNAPSHOT/version
version2.0-alpha-5-SNAPSHOT/version
version0.3.0-SNAPSHOT/version
version1.0-SNAPSHOT/version
version1.0-alpha-2-SNAPSHOT/version
version1.0-alpha-3-SNAPSHOT/version
version1.0-beta-3-SNAPSHOT/version
version1.0.2-SNAPSHOT/version
version1.1-SNAPSHOT/version
version1.1.1-SNAPSHOT/version
version1.2-SNAPSHOT/version
version1.2.2-SNAPSHOT/version
version1.3-SNAPSHOT/version
version2.0-beta-9-SNAPSHOT/version
version2.0-beta-10-SNAPSHOT/version
version2.0.11-SNAPSHOT/version
version2.1.0-SNAPSHOT/version
version2.1-SNAPSHOT/version
version2.1.0-M2-SNAPSHOT/version
version2.2-SNAPSHOT/version
version2.3-SNAPSHOT/version
version2.4.4-SNAPSHOT/version
version2.5-SNAPSHOT/version
version3.0-alpha-2-SNAPSHOT/version
version11-SNAPSHOT/version
version12-SNAPSHOT/version
/versions
lastUpdated20090417213533/lastUpdated
/versioning
/metadata


*** 
*** 
*** 
*** 
*** 
*** 

This e-mail is confidential, the property of NDS Ltd and intended  
for the
addressee only. Any dissemination, copying or distribution of this  
message
or any attachments by anyone other than the intended recipient is  
strictly
prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please  
immediately
notify the postmas...@nds.com and destroy the original message.  
Messages
sent to and from NDS may be monitored. NDS cannot guarantee any  
message
delivery method is secure or error-free. Information could be  
intercepted,
corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain  
viruses.
We do not accept responsibility for any errors or omissions in this  
message
and/or attachment that arise as a result of transmission. You  
should carry

out your own virus checks before opening any attachment. Any views or
opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not  
necessarily

represent those of NDS.

To protect the environment please do not print this e-mail unless
necessary.

NDS Limited Registered Office: One London Road, Staines, Middlesex,  
TW18
4EX, United Kingdom. A company registered in England and Wales  
Registered

no. 3080780 VAT no. GB 603 8808 40-00

*** 
*** 
*** 
*** 
*** 
*** 







--
Arnaud


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



RE: [VOTE] Release mercury-1.0-alpha-6

2009-04-10 Thread Brian E. Fox
+1

-Original Message-
From: John Casey [mailto:jdca...@commonjava.org] 
Sent: Friday, April 10, 2009 3:59 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release mercury-1.0-alpha-6

+1

I didn't see this vote at first because for some reason my email client 
thought it was part of the alpha-5 vote thread. Sorry for taking so long 
to vote.

-john

Oleg Gusakov wrote:
 Hi,
 
 Iterative alpha release. Major fixes:
 - # of dependencies - less'n 64 were ordered correctly the rest used to 
 be random ordering
 - bad/missing repository metadata is worked around in most cases
 
 Mercury-ant is now successfully used to bootstrap build Maven3 trunk. 
 Working towards implementing Maven repository system.
 
 We solved 7 issues:
 http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MERCURY/fixforversion/14964
 
 Staging repo:
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-staging-002/
 
 Guide to testing staged releases:
 http://maven.apache.org/guides/development/guide-testing-releases.html
 
 Vote open for 72 hours.
 
 [ ] +1
 [ ] +0
 [ ] -1
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



RE: Is it now possible to affect reactor build ordering without using a normal module dependency?

2009-04-03 Thread Brian E. Fox
No, it hasn't changed. This won't happen until 3.x when there is the
ability for a plugin to introspect the build plan pre-execution.

-Original Message-
From: James Carpenter [mailto:nawk...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, April 03, 2009 12:11 PM
To: dev@maven.apache.org
Subject: Is it now possible to affect reactor build ordering without
using a normal module dependency?

In the past plugins such as the dependency plugin didn't have a way to
affect the reactor build order without having the user add a real
dependency
(say test scope) to the module using the plugin (or having the plugin
programatically do the same) just to ensure proper build ordering.  I
assume
this problem will eventually be solved in some manner (say a ghost
dependency scope), but that it is likely a difficult one for some reason
or
other and therefore has not been solved long ago.

If all the referenced artifacts are jars one can sometimes workaround
the
problem using plugin dependencies like I did when enhancing the
exec:java
plugin for non-java modules.
http://mojo.codehaus.org/exec-maven-plugin/examples/example-exec-using-p
lugin-dependencies.html

I am about to write a plugin which automatically downloads a few
archives
specified by GAVs, and I'm wondering if the situation has improved.  If
not
I will simply use have to work around the issue.  Can anyone provide
some
color the current status of this issue?

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



RE: Is it now possible to affect reactor build ordering without using a normal module dependency?

2009-04-03 Thread Brian E. Fox
It's because a plugin may have a defacto dependency based on something
in its configuration. Maven won't know about this so if that dep is in
the same reactor, it may not be ordered correctly. The dependency:copy
is an example of this. There should be a way for a plugin to participate
in the reactor ordering for cases like this. There's a proposal but I
can't find it at this time.

-Original Message-
From: David Jencks [mailto:david_jen...@yahoo.com] 
Sent: Friday, April 03, 2009 12:34 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: Is it now possible to affect reactor build ordering without
using a normal module dependency?

Why do you want to affect the reactor build ordering without using a  
dependency?

The only use for something like this I have thought of so this  
might be a feature request is that I would like to be able to  
assure that a large project with deeply nested structure can be built  
in stages.  For instance if I have a project like this:

base
-sub1
--p1
--p2
-sub2
--p3
--p4

where base, sub1 and sub2 are pom packaging and p1...p4 have the code  
in them,

I would like to be able to assure that all of sub1 gets built before  
any of sub2 to assist in preventing any dependencies of p1 or p2 on p3  
or p4.  AFAICT the current behavior is that maven puts p1...p4 in a  
single bucket and tries to find a build order that satisfies the  
dependencies.

thanks
david jencks



On Apr 3, 2009, at 9:11 AM, James Carpenter wrote:

 In the past plugins such as the dependency plugin didn't have a way to
 affect the reactor build order without having the user add a real  
 dependency
 (say test scope) to the module using the plugin (or having the plugin
 programatically do the same) just to ensure proper build ordering.   
 I assume
 this problem will eventually be solved in some manner (say a ghost
 dependency scope), but that it is likely a difficult one for some  
 reason or
 other and therefore has not been solved long ago.

 If all the referenced artifacts are jars one can sometimes  
 workaround the
 problem using plugin dependencies like I did when enhancing the  
 exec:java
 plugin for non-java modules.

http://mojo.codehaus.org/exec-maven-plugin/examples/example-exec-using-p
lugin-dependencies.html

 I am about to write a plugin which automatically downloads a few  
 archives
 specified by GAVs, and I'm wondering if the situation has improved.   
 If not
 I will simply use have to work around the issue.  Can anyone provide  
 some
 color the current status of this issue?


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



RE: Is it now possible to affect reactor build ordering without using a normal module dependency?

2009-04-03 Thread Brian E. Fox
That's what I want in maven 3, but it's not there yet. 

-Original Message-
From: David Jencks [mailto:david_jen...@yahoo.com] 
Sent: Friday, April 03, 2009 2:29 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: Is it now possible to affect reactor build ordering without
using a normal module dependency?


On Apr 3, 2009, at 10:14 AM, Brian E. Fox wrote:

 It's because a plugin may have a defacto dependency based on something
 in its configuration. Maven won't know about this so if that dep is in
 the same reactor, it may not be ordered correctly. The dependency:copy
 is an example of this. There should be a way for a plugin to  
 participate
 in the reactor ordering for cases like this. There's a proposal but I
 can't find it at this time.

Hmmm

I guess when I read the dependency plugin docs and it said that it  
could download artifacts all by itself it didn't really register.  I  
don't really understand any point of view other than these required  
artifacts are dependencies that happen to be declared only in the  
plugin configuration, not in the normal dependencies section of the  
pom.  As such I'd expect that if you don't want to have to explicitly  
list them as dependencies then the plugin ought to get a chance to add  
dependencies during some kind of setup phase.  I have a plugin for  
which this would be extremely handy.  Is this what is planned for 3.0  
or is there another point of view I have yet to comprehend?

thanks
david jencks



 -Original Message-
 From: David Jencks [mailto:david_jen...@yahoo.com]
 Sent: Friday, April 03, 2009 12:34 PM
 To: Maven Developers List
 Subject: Re: Is it now possible to affect reactor build ordering  
 without
 using a normal module dependency?

 Why do you want to affect the reactor build ordering without using a
 dependency?

 The only use for something like this I have thought of so this
 might be a feature request is that I would like to be able to
 assure that a large project with deeply nested structure can be built
 in stages.  For instance if I have a project like this:

 base
 -sub1
 --p1
 --p2
 -sub2
 --p3
 --p4

 where base, sub1 and sub2 are pom packaging and p1...p4 have the code
 in them,

 I would like to be able to assure that all of sub1 gets built before
 any of sub2 to assist in preventing any dependencies of p1 or p2 on p3
 or p4.  AFAICT the current behavior is that maven puts p1...p4 in a
 single bucket and tries to find a build order that satisfies the
 dependencies.

 thanks
 david jencks



 On Apr 3, 2009, at 9:11 AM, James Carpenter wrote:

 In the past plugins such as the dependency plugin didn't have a way  
 to
 affect the reactor build order without having the user add a real
 dependency
 (say test scope) to the module using the plugin (or having the plugin
 programatically do the same) just to ensure proper build ordering.
 I assume
 this problem will eventually be solved in some manner (say a ghost
 dependency scope), but that it is likely a difficult one for some
 reason or
 other and therefore has not been solved long ago.

 If all the referenced artifacts are jars one can sometimes
 workaround the
 problem using plugin dependencies like I did when enhancing the
 exec:java
 plugin for non-java modules.


http://mojo.codehaus.org/exec-maven-plugin/examples/example-exec-using-p
 lugin-dependencies.html

 I am about to write a plugin which automatically downloads a few
 archives
 specified by GAVs, and I'm wondering if the situation has improved.
 If not
 I will simply use have to work around the issue.  Can anyone provide
 some
 color the current status of this issue?


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



RE: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Maven Release plugin version 2.0-beta-9 and scm 1.2

2009-03-28 Thread Brian E. Fox
It's in the process of syncing to central now. 

-Original Message-
From: oliver.l...@gmail.com [mailto:oliver.l...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
Olivier Lamy
Sent: Saturday, March 28, 2009 3:42 AM
To: Maven Developers List; scm-...@maven.apache.org
Subject: Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Maven Release plugin version
2.0-beta-9 and scm 1.2

Hi,
I have use the nexus ui to promote artifacts.
The release plugin is on central repo but not scm artifacts !!
Can someone have a look ?
Other issue : one day after site deploy on p.a.o sites are not yet
sync (release plugin and scm site)

Thanks!
--
Olivier

2009/3/27 Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org:
 Hi,
 The votes has passed with the following result :
 +1 (binding) : Arnaud HERITIER, Jason van Zyl,Emmanuel Venisse,
Olivier Lamy
 +1 (non-binding) : Marc Struberg

 I will move artifacts to central repo and publish the site.

 Thanks,
 --
 Olivier


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



RE: [ANN] Maven Release Plugin 2.0-beta-9 Released

2009-03-28 Thread Brian E. Fox
All set.

-Original Message-
From: Niall Pemberton [mailto:niall.pember...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Saturday, March 28, 2009 5:52 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: [ANN] Maven Release Plugin 2.0-beta-9 Released

The parent pom doesn't seem to have found its way to the public repo
yet, is it on its way?

http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/maven/release/maven-release/

Niall

On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 5:36 PM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
 Hi,
 The Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Maven Release
 Plugin, version 2.0-beta-9.

 http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-release-plugin/

 You should specify the version in your project's plugin configuration:

 plugin
  groupIdorg.apache.maven.plugins/groupId
  artifactIdmaven-release-plugin/artifactId
  version2.0-beta-9/version
 /plugin


 Release Notes - Maven 2.x Release Plugin - Version 2.0-beta-9


 ** Bug
    * [MRELEASE-273] - Regression: NullPointerException at end of
 standalone release:perform
    * [MRELEASE-375] - release plugin does not work with subversion  1.5.0
    * [MRELEASE-379] - return results after performing a release
    * [MRELEASE-381] - url syntax not good enough for the git scm provider
    * [MRELEASE-386] - Sneaky bug in DefaultReleaseManager.perform()
    * [MRELEASE-393] - NoSuchMethodError when using
 InvokerMavenExecutor with cmd line arg --quiet
    * [MRELEASE-405] - Wrong branch-name parameter

 ** Improvement
    * [MRELEASE-385] - Upgrade to last scm version (1.2)
    * [MRELEASE-392] - Align release-parent, release-manager and
 release-plugin versions
    * [MRELEASE-427] - Add a mojo parameter for using the new remote
 tagging for svn scm provider (to prevent issue with svn  1.5.0)
    * [MRELEASE-429] - Support for a [token]-SNAPSHOT in addition to
 [number]-SNAPSHOT


 ** Task
    * [MRELEASE-390] - Add VSS dependency

 Have Fun!

 --
 The Maven Team

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



RE: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Maven Release plugin version 2.0-beta-9 and scm 1.2

2009-03-28 Thread Brian E. Fox
All set. This was the same problem we saw with the install plugin
missing a file, the issue has been corrected now and shouldn't happen
any more.

-Original Message-
From: oliver.l...@gmail.com [mailto:oliver.l...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
Olivier Lamy
Sent: Saturday, March 28, 2009 6:00 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Maven Release plugin version
2.0-beta-9 and scm 1.2

So it looks they are still issues with groupId
org.apache.maven.release which is not sync.
Can you fix that too ?
The new release of release plugin is still not usuable.

Thanks,
--
Olivier

2009/3/28 Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org:
 I can see the artifacts on central now.

 Thanks Brian !

 --
 Olivier

 2009/3/28 Brian E. Fox bri...@reply.infinity.nu:
 It's in the process of syncing to central now.

 -Original Message-
 From: oliver.l...@gmail.com [mailto:oliver.l...@gmail.com] On Behalf
Of
 Olivier Lamy
 Sent: Saturday, March 28, 2009 3:42 AM
 To: Maven Developers List; scm-...@maven.apache.org
 Subject: Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Maven Release plugin version
 2.0-beta-9 and scm 1.2

 Hi,
 I have use the nexus ui to promote artifacts.
 The release plugin is on central repo but not scm artifacts !!
 Can someone have a look ?
 Other issue : one day after site deploy on p.a.o sites are not yet
 sync (release plugin and scm site)

 Thanks!
 --
 Olivier

 2009/3/27 Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org:
 Hi,
 The votes has passed with the following result :
 +1 (binding) : Arnaud HERITIER, Jason van Zyl,Emmanuel Venisse,
 Olivier Lamy
 +1 (non-binding) : Marc Struberg

 I will move artifacts to central repo and publish the site.

 Thanks,
 --
 Olivier


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



RE: Re : Re : [VOTE] Release Maven eclipse plugin version 2.6

2009-03-27 Thread Brian E. Fox
Ok I just wasn't sure because there was lots of talk about eclipse
plugin fixes in parallel so I lost track.

-Original Message-
From: Barrie Treloar [mailto:baerr...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, March 27, 2009 2:52 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: Re : Re : [VOTE] Release Maven eclipse plugin version 2.6

On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Arnaud HERITIER aherit...@gmail.com
wrote:
 No, there's no reason to stop it.We'll publish a 1.6.1 in few days if
 necessary

Except the current vote count :)

+1 (binding):
  aherit...@gmail.com

+1 (non binding):
  belling...@gmail.com
  nicolas.del...@gmail.com
  baerr...@gmail.com

We need some more PMC votes please.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



RE: Maven Enterprise Edition from Overall.ca?

2009-03-26 Thread Brian E. Fox
It looks like a hardware tracking / provisioning tool not a build system. 
Shrug. Not related to Apache Maven at all it appears to me.

-Original Message-
From: Wayne Fay [mailto:wayne...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 2:19 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Maven Enterprise Edition from Overall.ca?

Just saw something odd in Gmail web clip/sponsored link while browsing
emails to the list...

Maven Enterprise Edition - www.overall.ca/maven - Build the ultimate
toolbox for your Windows support tools

From their site:
Introducing Maven Enterprise Edition
Your enterprise data is typically found in multiple sources. Maven
Enterprise Edition enables your organization to build and deploy a
complete Windows support dashboard, with all of the queries, support
tools, scripts and enterprise information required to rapidly service
your IT infrastructure. Your service desk can do what they do best;
service your organization.

Their About Us says they've been around since 2002. Click into the
forums and the oldest post is 2008-12-02, so its hard to tell how old
their Maven Enterprise Edition tool really is.

Anyone know these guys? Obviously their Maven has no relationship
whatsoever to this one. Pretty bad choice of names on their part, imo.

Wayne

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



RE: Re : Re : [VOTE] Release Maven eclipse plugin version 2.6

2009-03-26 Thread Brian E. Fox
Has this vote been officially cancelled?

-Original Message-
From: Julien HENRY [mailto:henr...@yahoo.fr] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 11:27 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re : Re : [VOTE] Release Maven eclipse plugin version 2.6


Done:

http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MECLIPSE-536



- Message d'origine 
De : Arnaud HERITIER aherit...@gmail.com
À : Maven Developers List dev@maven.apache.org
Envoyé le : Mardi, 24 Mars 2009, 10h23mn 10s
Objet : Re: Re : [VOTE] Release Maven eclipse plugin version 2.6

yes please.

2009/3/24 Julien HENRY henr...@yahoo.fr


 I got the following error:

 mvn clean install eclipse:eclipse -Pstaged -cpu
 ...
 [INFO]
 
 [ERROR] BUILD ERROR
 [INFO]
 
 [INFO] Internal error in the plugin manager executing goal
 'org..apache.maven.plugins:maven-eclipse-plugin:2.6:eclipse':
 Unable to load the mojo
 'org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-eclipse-plugin:2.6:eclipse' in the plugin
 'org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-eclipse-plugin'. A required class is
 missing: org/codehaus/plexus/resource/loader/ResourceNotFoundException

 mvn -v
 Apache Maven 2.1.0-RC3 (r754932; 2009-03-16 17:31:06+0100)
 Java version: 1.4.2_17
 Java home: C:\j2sdk1.4.2_17\jre
 Default locale: fr_FR, platform encoding: Cp1252
 OS name: windows xp version: 5.1 arch: x86 Family: windows

 Do you want I open an issue in JIRA with full stack trace?

 Regards,

 Julien




 - Message d'origine 
 De : Barrie Treloar baerr...@gmail.com
 À : Maven Developers List dev@maven.apache.org
 Envoyé le : Mardi, 24 Mars 2009, 1h05mn 40s
 Objet : [VOTE] Release Maven eclipse plugin version 2.6

 Hi,

 We solved 35 issues:

 http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=14163styleName=HtmlprojectId=11133

 There remaining issues left in JIRA:
 http://jira.codehaus.
 .org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=truepid=11133status=1

 Staging repo:

 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-staging-52acfb2f215fcf/

 Staging site:
 http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-eclipse-plugin-2.6/

 Guide to testing staged releases:
 http://maven.apache.org/guides/development/guide-testing-releases.html

 Vote open for 72 hours.

 [ ] +1
 [ ] +0
 [ ] -1

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org





 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org




-- 
Arnaud



  


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



RE: Recording build environment

2009-03-25 Thread Brian E. Fox
It seems like if there were some properties available, or known to the
resources plugin, then you could filter these values in anywhere you
wanted them.

-Original Message-
From: Paul Gier [mailto:pg...@redhat.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2009 11:54 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Recording build environment

I'd like to be able to record the build environment (maven version,
java, OS, 
etc) for each build that is run in a standard way.  I originally created
a jira 
issue in the release plugin (MRELEASE-352) to record information just
for 
releases.  But now I'm thinking that this could be useful for any build.

I'd just like to get a few other opinions about this before working on
it.  Is 
there any existing plugin that might be a good fit for this type of 
functionality?  Or should it be a new plugin?  Or would this type of
thing be 
better handled by something like Hudson?

Thanks!

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



potential 2.1.0 regression?

2009-03-25 Thread Brian E. Fox
I tried a build with -N (non recursive) and I get an error with 2.1.0:

 

[INFO] Parent project loaded from repository.

[INFO]


[ERROR] BUILD ERROR

[INFO]


[INFO] Error when populating modules

 

Embedded error: Unable to read local module-POM

Unable to download the artifact from any repository

 

Anyone else seen this?

 

--

Brian Fox

Apache Maven PMC

http://blogs.sonatype.com/brian/

 



RE: Recording build environment

2009-03-25 Thread Brian E. Fox
Not a property, but there's a component - RuntimeInformation iirc that
has it. Take a look at the enforcer:display-info goal code, it shows all
of it for you.

-Original Message-
From: Paul Gier [mailto:pg...@redhat.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2009 3:21 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: Recording build environment

That's true, I can get the OS and Java version from standard properties,
and 
then put them in the Manifest or somewhere else.  Is there a property
that 
contains the current running version of maven?

Brian E. Fox wrote:
 It seems like if there were some properties available, or known to the
 resources plugin, then you could filter these values in anywhere you
 wanted them.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Paul Gier [mailto:pg...@redhat.com] 
 Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2009 11:54 AM
 To: Maven Developers List
 Subject: Recording build environment
 
 I'd like to be able to record the build environment (maven version,
 java, OS, 
 etc) for each build that is run in a standard way.  I originally
created
 a jira 
 issue in the release plugin (MRELEASE-352) to record information just
 for 
 releases.  But now I'm thinking that this could be useful for any
build.
 
 I'd just like to get a few other opinions about this before working on
 it.  Is 
 there any existing plugin that might be a good fit for this type of 
 functionality?  Or should it be a new plugin?  Or would this type of
 thing be 
 better handled by something like Hudson?
 
 Thanks!
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



RE: potential 2.1.0 regression?

2009-03-25 Thread Brian E. Fox
It happened on the enforcer plugin parent. I was testing the upgraded
repo so I changed the tlp to a release test version, then did mvn deploy
-N. I tried again later and got the same behavior with 2.0.10 so it's
not a regression in 2.1 but I've yet to check 2.0.9

-Original Message-
From: John Casey [mailto:jdca...@commonjava.org] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2009 3:21 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: potential 2.1.0 regression?

File it, and if you have a test project setup that we can use to 
duplicate it, we'll take a look. That's the best I can tell you...the 
console output you included really isn't much to go on.

Sorry,

-john

Brian E. Fox wrote:
 I tried a build with -N (non recursive) and I get an error with 2.1.0:
 
  
 
 [INFO] Parent project loaded from repository.
 
 [INFO]


 
 [ERROR] BUILD ERROR
 
 [INFO]


 
 [INFO] Error when populating modules
 
  
 
 Embedded error: Unable to read local module-POM
 
 Unable to download the artifact from any repository
 
  
 
 Anyone else seen this?
 
  
 
 --
 
 Brian Fox
 
 Apache Maven PMC
 
 http://blogs.sonatype.com/brian/
 
  
 
 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



RE: Release for maven-archetype-plugin

2009-03-24 Thread Brian E. Fox
don't forget to use the new snapshot repository
http://repository.zones.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/

The correct url is http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



RE: deprecating MavenSession.lookup( role|class ) and prefer injection in plugins

2009-03-23 Thread Brian E. Fox
The enforcer uses this to hand components over to the rules via a get
Component method (it implements the expressionevaluator interface). I
would probably need to convert all the rules over to actual plexus
components to use injection.

-Original Message-
From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:jvan...@sonatype.com] 
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 7:51 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: deprecating MavenSession.lookup( role|class ) and prefer
injection in plugins

Hi,

I would like to remove the MavenSession.lookup( class|role ) methods  
in Maven 3.x so I would like to start deprecating them and prefer  
injecting anything required using a javadoc annotation (current plugin  
api) and an annotation (the new plugin api).

General access to the container is not required more with the new  
annotation-based Plexus containers and it's really a bad practice not  
to have injected all the things you need.

Plexus used in Maven 3.x injects collections properly and as new  
components enter the system they find their way into the correct  
collections. So, for example, if a new lifecycle mapping is discovered  
in the system it will just automatically show up it the  
MapString,Lifecycle inside the LifecycleExecutor. This was the  
primary reason why we exposed the container and it's not required  
anymore.

So if we deprecate starting now, folks will know long before Maven 3.x  
comes out.

Thanks,

Jason

--
Jason van Zyl
Founder,  Apache Maven
http://twitter.com/jvanzyl
--

Our achievements speak for themselves. What we have to keep track
of are our failures, discouragements and doubts. We tend to forget
the past difficulties, the many false starts, and the painful
groping. We see our past achievements as the end result of a
clean forward thrust, and our present difficulties as
signs of decline and decay.

  -- Eric Hoffer, Reflections on the Human Condition


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



RE: [vote] Maven 2.1.0

2009-03-20 Thread Brian E. Fox
+1 I tested briefly against 2.0.x build with various values of parallel
downloads and everything seems ok.

-Original Message-
From: Arnaud HERITIER [mailto:aherit...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 2:07 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: [vote] Maven 2.1.0

+1
Arnaud

On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 9:55 PM, Vincent Siveton
vsive...@apache.orgwrote:

 +1

 Vincent

 2009/3/18 John Casey jdca...@commonjava.org:
  Hi everyone,
 
  It looks like Maven 2.1.0 is ready to release.
 
  You can try the binaries here:
 
  http://tinyurl.com/maven-2-1-0-vote
  (

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-staging-511ea88
2714d8b/org/apache/maven/apache-maven/2.1.0/
 )
 
  We've resolved 85 issues for this release (enumerated at the end of
this
  message):
 
 

http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500styleNa
me=Htmlversion=14587
 
  Vote's open for 72 hours. Please cast your vote:
 
  [ ] +1
  [ ] +0
  [ ] -1
 
  Here's my +1.
 
  Thanks,
 
  -john
 
  ===
 
 
  Release Notes - Maven 2 - Version 2.1.0
 
  ** Sub-task
 * [MNG-4025] - Prominently document opt-out setting for parallel
 artifact
  resolution for users
 * [MNG-4042] - Use plexus-sec-dispatcher 1.0 in Maven core when
it is
  released
 
  ** Bug
 * [MNG-1349] - openssl checksums are not accepted by maven
 * [MNG-1585] - debug logging from wagon not shown in debug mode
 * [MNG-1992] - CLI -D should override properties in settings.xml
 * [MNG-1999] - Reporting inheritance does not work properly
 * [MNG-2432] - Apache and Mojo plugins take precendence over
plugins
 in
  the pom.
 * [MNG-2433] - Maven looks for snapshots in offline mode
 * [MNG-2605] - Profiles in profiles.xml are active by default
 * [MNG-2668] - Plugin dependencies should be considered when the
 reactor
  creates the build order list
 * [MNG-2690] - DefaultPluginManager.getConfiguredMojo() doesn't
handle
  NoClassDefFoundError correctly
 * [MNG-2695] - -o makes build fail for snapshot plugins
 * [MNG-2720] - Multiproject dependencies not accurate for
  project.compileClasspathElements when run from root project
 * [MNG-3023] - Reactor projects should be included in dependency
  resolution
 * [MNG-3057] - properties not expanded in generated POMs when
building
  A/B/C nested projects
 * [MNG-3139] - The skin does not exist: Unable to determine the
 release
  version
 * [MNG-3217] - a plugin's dependencies can influence other
plugins in
 a
  build
 * [MNG-3228] - Maven profile activation does not work when
profile is
  defined in inherited 'parent' pom
 * [MNG-3271] - excludeDefaults does not seem to work
 * [MNG-3284] - Cached plugins are used, even when the
specifically
  declared
 * [MNG-3314] - offline build not running, when having SNAPSHOT
  dependencies
 * [MNG-3621] - site url inheritance broken for UNC paths
 * [MNG-3628] - When running offline, snapshot artifcats cannot be
  resolved even if they have previously be dowloaded from a repository
 * [MNG-3641] - Lack of error checks on profiles
 * [MNG-3645] - Maven doesn't do strict model validation for POMs
in
 the
  current reactor
 * [MNG-3719] - [regression] plugin execution ordering no longer
POM
  ordered in 2.0.9
 * [MNG-3757] - Setting M2_HOME to nothing and running ant delets
 contents
  of the current folder
 * [MNG-3769] - [regression] Excluding relocated transitive
 dependencies
  does not work
 * [MNG-3776] - Namespace misspelled in settings.xml
 * [MNG-3808] - Execution order of report plugins is arbitrary if
  inheritance is involved
 * [MNG-3810] - [regression] Null Pointer Exception when
Activation
  Profile Property is Empty
 * [MNG-3811] - Report plugins don't inherit configuration
 * [MNG-3899] - Inheritance does not merge extensions with same
gid and
  aid
 * [MNG-3906] - Project-level plugin dependencies are in random
order
  after merging
 * [MNG-3920] - Problem using velocity component
 * [MNG-3930] - mvn.bat doesn't handle ampersand in Windows user
name
  properly
 * [MNG-3933] - Profiles.xml does not pickup OS family
 * [MNG-3940] - Interpolation of environment variables is not
  case-insensitive on Windows
 * [MNG-3948] - Remote repos defined by profiles outside of
 settings.xml
  are not used to resolve parent POMs
 * [MNG-3974] - New mirror syntax is not stopping on first match
 * [MNG-4016] - Properties with the prefix project/pom are not
  interpolated from the properties section
 * [MNG-4023] - Profiles from parent POM are injected multiple
times if
  parent is part of reactor build
 * [MNG-4026] - [regression] Order of project class path does not
match
  POM order during reactor build
 * [MNG-4032] - Test jar dependency not available for for main
classes
 in
  multi module builds
 * [MNG-4043] - Resolve or rollback WebDAV wagon deployment issue
where
  hostname is 

RE: Current status of moving apache projects to apache's nexus instance?

2009-03-18 Thread Brian E. Fox
David, the process to migrate the process is covered here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1896

The usage docs for the Maven release process covers everything else once
you are setup:
http://maven.apache.org/developers/release/releasing.html

-Original Message-
From: David Jencks [mailto:david_jen...@yahoo.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 3:48 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Cc: Portals Discussion
Subject: Current status of moving apache projects to apache's nexus
instance?

I'm trying to help the apache portals project set up some root poms.   
They are currently using the apache pom version 5 which IIUC deploys  
releases and snapshots to the apache nexus instance.

I googled but couldn't find any instructions on how to proceed with  
this.  I think it would be pretty handy if the maven site had a page  
linked from the front page with some up to date instructions.  For  
instance IIUC when portals releases these poms (to nexus, right?) all  
the existing portals stuff also has to be moved by hand to nexus and  
all future portals releases have to go to nexus.  Or did I make this up?

Something else I'd find pretty helpful is info on what the recommended  
release profile for apache projects is and whether you even need one  
or if some default is adequate.

In case anyone wants to review the portals poms to advise on whether  
they are likely to work...

https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/portals/portals-pom/trunk/pom.xml
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/portals/applications/applications-pom/t
runk/pom.xml

thanks
david jencks


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



RE: Current status of moving apache projects to apache's nexus instance?

2009-03-18 Thread Brian E. Fox
I'll write some docs to cover this for Apache globally, but iirc there
weren't docs before for p.a.o, so the current docs have to be better
than what was there previously. 

Each project presumably has their own release docs similar to what we
have for Maven that I've pointed projects to as they migrate. I'll make
some docs but its not immediately clear where I should put them for
apache wide resources.

-Original Message-
From: David Jencks [mailto:david_jen...@yahoo.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 11:42 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Cc: Portals Discussion
Subject: Re: Current status of moving apache projects to apache's nexus
instance?

jdcasey helped a bit on IRC, thanks.

I think the documentation on this is really unsatisfactory.  At least  
I can't find anything by googling.  John pointed be to the maven  
release instructions
http://maven.apache.org/developers/release/releasing.html 
  which might be OK for maven components but are a bit lacking as a  
guide to best practices for apache projects.

I've opened a jira with a few suggestions for improvements to this  
page  http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-4095

Having the apache nexus instance there is great but I'm afraid you'll  
get extremely bad press if the apache 5 pom is out there and there is  
no trivially accessible documentation about what the consequences are  
of using it.  For instance portals recently decided having a root pom  
might be a good idea and naturally chose the most recent apache pom as  
the parent with no awareness of the consequences about where their  
deployments will end up and whether or not any other steps need to be  
taken for other portals project release destinations.

thanks
david jencks

On Mar 17, 2009, at 3:48 PM, David Jencks wrote:

 I'm trying to help the apache portals project set up some root  
 poms.  They are currently using the apache pom version 5 which IIUC  
 deploys releases and snapshots to the apache nexus instance.

 I googled but couldn't find any instructions on how to proceed with  
 this.  I think it would be pretty handy if the maven site had a page  
 linked from the front page with some up to date instructions.  For  
 instance IIUC when portals releases these poms (to nexus, right?)  
 all the existing portals stuff also has to be moved by hand to nexus  
 and all future portals releases have to go to nexus.  Or did I make  
 this up?

 Something else I'd find pretty helpful is info on what the  
 recommended release profile for apache projects is and whether you  
 even need one or if some default is adequate.

 In case anyone wants to review the portals poms to advise on whether  
 they are likely to work...

 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/portals/portals-pom/trunk/pom.xml

https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/portals/applications/applications-pom/t
runk/pom.xml

 thanks
 david jencks


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



RE: Maven release...in progress

2009-03-18 Thread Brian E. Fox
The issue is resolved so you can go ahead and release.

-Original Message-
From: John Casey [mailto:jdca...@commonjava.org] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 12:36 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Maven release...in progress

Hi,

I just wanted to let everyone know that I'm currently in the process of 
staging the 2.1.0 artifacts so I can call the vote to release. However, 
I'm stuck with a problem out on repository.apache.org, and I'm sorry to 
say I don't have the expertise with Nexus to know how to fix it.

I've already emailed Brian to get his help, but I think he may be on the

road today.

I wanted to let everyone know this so you don't think we're stuck in 
limbo with this release process. Everything is looking good for the 
release, and as soon as I can jump this technical hurdle we'll be back 
on track!

Thanks,

-john

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



RE: svn commit: r753302 - in /maven/plugins/trunk/maven-compiler-plugin/src: it/alt-src-output-directories-MCOMPILER-91/ it/alt-src-output-directories-MCOMPILER-91/src/ it/alt-src-output-directories-M

2009-03-13 Thread Brian E. Fox
Why doesn't the buildhelper plugin work for this use case? That lets you
attach many source folders.

-Original Message-
From: Paul Gier [mailto:pg...@redhat.com] 
Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009 2:58 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: svn commit: r753302 - in
/maven/plugins/trunk/maven-compiler-plugin/src:
it/alt-src-output-directories-MCOMPILER-91/
it/alt-src-output-directories-MCOMPILER-91/src/
it/alt-src-output-directories-MCOMPILER-91/src/my-classes/
it/alt-src-output-directori

Do you have an issue with it in both the compile and test-compile mojos?
Or is 
the test-compile mojo ok?
The test-compile mojo is where I need it because I have multiple sets of
test 
classes that require different compile parameters.

Jason van Zyl wrote:
 -1
 
 I don't want people to start abusing this and directly using multiple 
 source directories. This will get abused so fast and is only required
by 
 people who have messed up systems.
 
 On 13-Mar-09, at 8:37 AM, pg...@apache.org wrote:
 
 Author: pgier
 Date: Fri Mar 13 15:37:13 2009
 New Revision: 753302

 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=753302view=rev
 Log:
 [MCOMPILER-91] Allow source and output directories to be configured.

 Patch from Peter Janes (peterj).

 Added:


maven/plugins/trunk/maven-compiler-plugin/src/it/alt-src-output-director
ies-MCOMPILER-91/ 



maven/plugins/trunk/maven-compiler-plugin/src/it/alt-src-output-director
ies-MCOMPILER-91/pom.xml   
 (with props)


maven/plugins/trunk/maven-compiler-plugin/src/it/alt-src-output-director
ies-MCOMPILER-91/src/ 



maven/plugins/trunk/maven-compiler-plugin/src/it/alt-src-output-director
ies-MCOMPILER-91/src/my-classes/ 



maven/plugins/trunk/maven-compiler-plugin/src/it/alt-src-output-director
ies-MCOMPILER-91/src/my-classes/java/ 



maven/plugins/trunk/maven-compiler-plugin/src/it/alt-src-output-director
ies-MCOMPILER-91/src/my-classes/java/MyTest.java   
 (with props)


maven/plugins/trunk/maven-compiler-plugin/src/it/alt-src-output-director
ies-MCOMPILER-91/verify.bsh   
 (with props)
 Modified:


maven/plugins/trunk/maven-compiler-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/maven
/plugin/CompilerMojo.java 



maven/plugins/trunk/maven-compiler-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/maven
/plugin/TestCompilerMojo.java 


 Added: 

maven/plugins/trunk/maven-compiler-plugin/src/it/alt-src-output-director
ies-MCOMPILER-91/pom.xml 

 URL: 

http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/plugins/trunk/maven-compiler-plugin/s
rc/it/alt-src-output-directories-MCOMPILER-91/pom.xml?rev=753302view=au
to 



== 

 --- 

maven/plugins/trunk/maven-compiler-plugin/src/it/alt-src-output-director
ies-MCOMPILER-91/pom.xml 
 (added)
 +++ 

maven/plugins/trunk/maven-compiler-plugin/src/it/alt-src-output-director
ies-MCOMPILER-91/pom.xml 
 Fri Mar 13 15:37:13 2009
 @@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
 +?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
 +!--
 +  ~ Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
 +  ~ or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
 +  ~ distributed with this work for additional information
 +  ~ regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
 +  ~ to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
 +  ~ License); you may not use this file except in compliance
 +  ~ with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
 +  ~
 +  ~   http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
 +  ~
 +  ~ Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
 +  ~ software distributed under the License is distributed on an
 +  ~ AS IS BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
 +  ~ KIND, either express or implied.  See the License for the
 +  ~ specific language governing permissions and limitations
 +  ~ under the License.
 +  --
 +
 +project xmlns=http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0;
 + xmlns:xsi=http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance;
 + xsi:schemaLocation=http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0 
 http://maven.apache.org/maven-v4_0_0.xsd;
 +  modelVersion4.0.0/modelVersion
 +
 +  groupIdorg.apache.maven.plugins.compiler/groupId
 +  artifactIdaltconfig/artifactId
 +  version1.0-SNAPSHOT/version
 +
 +  nameTest for alternative source/target configuration/name
 +
 +  properties
 +
project.build.sourceEncodingUTF-8/project.build.sourceEncoding
 +  /properties
 +
 +  dependencies
 +dependency
 +  groupIdjunit/groupId
 +  artifactIdjunit/artifactId
 +  version3.8.2/version
 +/dependency
 +  /dependencies
 +
 +  build
 +plugins
 +  plugin
 +groupIdorg.apache.maven.plugins/groupId
 +artifactIdmaven-compiler-plugin/artifactId
 +version@pom.version@/version
 +executions
 +  execution
 +idmy-classes/id
 +phasecompile/phase
 +goals
 +  goalcompile/goal
 +/goals
 +configuration
 +  compileSourceRoots
 +
 

RE: install:install-file Repository MetaData files maven-metadata-local.xml

2009-03-13 Thread Brian E. Fox
In order for maven to look in the right place for the shorthand lookup,
you need to add a pluginGroup in your settings. By default, maven only
uses org.apache.maven.plugins and org.codehaus.mojo.


-Original Message-
From: Kaveh Goudarzi [mailto:ka...@itkaa.com] 
Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009 11:22 AM
To: dev@maven.apache.org
Subject: install:install-file  Repository MetaData files
maven-metadata-local.xml

Hi All,

   I've implemented a maven plugin which when installed via the mvn
install command as part of the build is installed correctly in the
local repository.  By adding the plugin group reference to the
~/.m2/settings.xml I'm able to then invoke the plugin using it's short
hand prefix or without specifying the version.  So far so good.

   However I find that when I send the users the jar file alone and
ask them to install the plugin using the following command

mvn install:install-file -Dfile=maven-mytest-plugin-1.1.jar \
 -DgroupId=com.my.package \
 -DartifactId=maven-mytest-plugin \
 -Dpackaging=maven-plugin \
 -Dversion=1.1 \
 -DupdateReleaseInfo=true \
 -DcreateChecksum=true \
 -DgeneratePom=true


   The users always have to supply the full plugin
group:artifact-id:version:goal and are not able to use the short-hand
or the default latest version of the plugin.

Comparing the maven repository files I see that when I install
the
plugin on my dev machine using the mvn install command two crucial
files are created which are absent when the mvn install:install-file
command is invoked.  These are:

~/.m2/repositories/com/my/package/maven-metadata-local.xml
--
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?metadata
  plugins
plugin
  namemaven-mytest-plugin Maven Mojo/name
  prefixmytest/prefix
  artifactIdmaven-mytest-plugin/artifactId
/plugin
  /plugins
/metadata

and another one at

~/.m2/repositories/com/my/package/maven-mytest-plugin/maven-metadata-loc
al.xml
--
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?metadata
  groupIdcom.my.package/groupId
  artifactIdmaven-mytest-plugin/artifactId
  version1.1/version
  versioning
latest1.1/latest
versions
  version1.1/version
/versions
lastUpdated20090312204457/lastUpdated
  /versioning
/metadata

These two files appear to be crucial in allowing me to invoke
the
plugin using the long-hand but not specifying the version and for it
to default to the latest version and also to allow the short hand
prefix invocation.

So my questions is what is the correct way of installing such a
plugin? ... am I missing some crucial step?  I found this link but
couldn't understand if it applies
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/Repository+Metadata

I'm using 2.0.9 writing plugins in java

mvn -version
Maven version: 2.0.9
Java version: 1.5.0_16
OS name: mac os x version: 10.5.6 arch: i386 Family: unix

thanks in advance for you help + kind regards,

Kaveh.






-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



RE: maven-site-plugin pre 2.0 not in maven-metadata.xml

2009-03-13 Thread Brian E. Fox
Yes, we are fixing it now.

-Original Message-
From: oliver.l...@gmail.com [mailto:oliver.l...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Olivier 
Lamy
Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009 5:26 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Fwd: maven-site-plugin pre 2.0 not in maven-metadata.xml

Hi,
First sorry for cross posting.
But it looks the deployement through staging via nexus override/delete metadata.
I have checked and there is the same issue with the ear plugin
(recently deployed with the new process).

Is-it possible to fix that ? (and restoring correct metadata ? )

Thanks,
--
Olivier


-- Forwarded message --
From: Jean-Marc Lugrin f...@lugrin.ch
Date: 2009/3/13
Subject: maven-site-plugin pre 2.0 not in maven-metadata.xml
To: us...@maven.apache.org us...@maven.apache.org


We are still using maven 2.0.4 and we depend on maven-site-plugin pre 2.0
(some of the beta).  The repository location repo1
/maven2/org/apache/maven/plugins/maven-site-plugin/ contains the beta
versions, but the file maven-metadata.xml only references the version 2.0.
Should it not reference the other versions as well ? After a download via
the maven proxy, the file maven-metada from repo1 was loaded locally and the
previous versions (that we have locally) are not found anymore ny maven.

Jean-Marc

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



RE: svn commit: r753302 - in /maven/plugins/trunk/maven-compiler-plugin/src: it/alt-src-output-directories-MCOMPILER-91/ it/alt-src-output-directories-MCOMPILER-91/src/ it/alt-src-output-directories-M

2009-03-13 Thread Brian E. Fox
Can you do it with multiple compiler executions? I'm thinking something
like add all the src folders, and then exclude them in one execution and
vice-versa in the other. 

-Original Message-
From: Paul Gier [mailto:pg...@redhat.com] 
Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009 4:15 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: svn commit: r753302 - in
/maven/plugins/trunk/maven-compiler-plugin/src:
it/alt-src-output-directories-MCOMPILER-91/
it/alt-src-output-directories-MCOMPILER-91/src/
it/alt-src-output-directories-MCOMPILER-91/src/my-classes/
it/alt-src-output-directori

The build helper plugin allows me to add more source directories, but
doesn't 
allow me to have different compiler configurations for the different 
directories.  And also doesn't allow me to specify separate output
directories.

I have some situations where it is useful to have two separate test
sources that 
are compiled differently and then output to different locations.  For
the main 
sources it's not as much of an issue.

Brian E. Fox wrote:
 Why doesn't the buildhelper plugin work for this use case? That lets
you
 attach many source folders.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Paul Gier [mailto:pg...@redhat.com] 
 Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009 2:58 PM
 To: Maven Developers List
 Subject: Re: svn commit: r753302 - in
 /maven/plugins/trunk/maven-compiler-plugin/src:
 it/alt-src-output-directories-MCOMPILER-91/
 it/alt-src-output-directories-MCOMPILER-91/src/
 it/alt-src-output-directories-MCOMPILER-91/src/my-classes/
 it/alt-src-output-directori
 
 Do you have an issue with it in both the compile and test-compile
mojos?
 Or is 
 the test-compile mojo ok?
 The test-compile mojo is where I need it because I have multiple sets
of
 test 
 classes that require different compile parameters.
 
 Jason van Zyl wrote:
 -1

 I don't want people to start abusing this and directly using multiple

 source directories. This will get abused so fast and is only required
 by 
 people who have messed up systems.

 On 13-Mar-09, at 8:37 AM, pg...@apache.org wrote:

 Author: pgier
 Date: Fri Mar 13 15:37:13 2009
 New Revision: 753302

 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=753302view=rev
 Log:
 [MCOMPILER-91] Allow source and output directories to be configured.
 
 Patch from Peter Janes (peterj).

 Added:



maven/plugins/trunk/maven-compiler-plugin/src/it/alt-src-output-director
 ies-MCOMPILER-91/ 



maven/plugins/trunk/maven-compiler-plugin/src/it/alt-src-output-director
 ies-MCOMPILER-91/pom.xml   
 (with props)



maven/plugins/trunk/maven-compiler-plugin/src/it/alt-src-output-director
 ies-MCOMPILER-91/src/ 



maven/plugins/trunk/maven-compiler-plugin/src/it/alt-src-output-director
 ies-MCOMPILER-91/src/my-classes/ 



maven/plugins/trunk/maven-compiler-plugin/src/it/alt-src-output-director
 ies-MCOMPILER-91/src/my-classes/java/ 



maven/plugins/trunk/maven-compiler-plugin/src/it/alt-src-output-director
 ies-MCOMPILER-91/src/my-classes/java/MyTest.java   
 (with props)



maven/plugins/trunk/maven-compiler-plugin/src/it/alt-src-output-director
 ies-MCOMPILER-91/verify.bsh   
 (with props)
 Modified:



maven/plugins/trunk/maven-compiler-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/maven
 /plugin/CompilerMojo.java 



maven/plugins/trunk/maven-compiler-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/maven
 /plugin/TestCompilerMojo.java 

 Added: 


maven/plugins/trunk/maven-compiler-plugin/src/it/alt-src-output-director
 ies-MCOMPILER-91/pom.xml 
 URL: 


http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/plugins/trunk/maven-compiler-plugin/s

rc/it/alt-src-output-directories-MCOMPILER-91/pom.xml?rev=753302view=au
 to 



 == 
 --- 


maven/plugins/trunk/maven-compiler-plugin/src/it/alt-src-output-director
 ies-MCOMPILER-91/pom.xml 
 (added)
 +++ 


maven/plugins/trunk/maven-compiler-plugin/src/it/alt-src-output-director
 ies-MCOMPILER-91/pom.xml 
 Fri Mar 13 15:37:13 2009
 @@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
 +?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
 +!--
 +  ~ Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
 +  ~ or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
 +  ~ distributed with this work for additional information
 +  ~ regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
 +  ~ to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
 +  ~ License); you may not use this file except in compliance
 +  ~ with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
 +  ~
 +  ~   http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
 +  ~
 +  ~ Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
 +  ~ software distributed under the License is distributed on an
 +  ~ AS IS BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
 +  ~ KIND, either express or implied.  See the License for the
 +  ~ specific language governing permissions and limitations
 +  ~ under the License.
 +  --
 +
 +project xmlns=http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0;
 + xmlns:xsi=http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance

RE: install:install-file Repository MetaData files maven-metadata-local.xml

2009-03-13 Thread Brian E. Fox
Ah, I see. The install-file doesn't understand what should be done for
plugins, which is why it's there for you but not someone else. Why not
publish this plugin to a repo that your users can access? It will make
your life easier.

-Original Message-
From: Kaveh Goudarzi [mailto:ka...@itkaa.com] 
Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009 4:18 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: install:install-file  Repository MetaData files
maven-metadata-local.xml

Hi Brian,

In both cases the pluginGroup is added to my settings.xml e.g

~/.m2/settings.xml
--
settings
pluginGroups
  pluginGroupcom.my.pacakge/pluginGroup
/pluginGroups
/settings
--

However it only appears to work if the two
maven-metadata-local.xml
files exist otherwise the short-hand or non-specific-version
invocations fail.

Any thoughts?

thanks in advance.

Kaveh.

Brian E. Fox wrote:
 In order for maven to look in the right place for the shorthand
lookup,
 you need to add a pluginGroup in your settings. By default, maven only
 uses org.apache.maven.plugins and org.codehaus.mojo.
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Kaveh Goudarzi [mailto:ka...@itkaa.com] 
 Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009 11:22 AM
 To: dev@maven.apache.org
 Subject: install:install-file  Repository MetaData files
 maven-metadata-local.xml
 
 Hi All,
 
I've implemented a maven plugin which when installed via the mvn
 install command as part of the build is installed correctly in the
 local repository.  By adding the plugin group reference to the
 ~/.m2/settings.xml I'm able to then invoke the plugin using it's short
 hand prefix or without specifying the version.  So far so good.
 
However I find that when I send the users the jar file alone and
 ask them to install the plugin using the following command
 
 mvn install:install-file -Dfile=maven-mytest-plugin-1.1.jar \
  -DgroupId=com.my.package \
  -DartifactId=maven-mytest-plugin \
  -Dpackaging=maven-plugin \
  -Dversion=1.1 \
  -DupdateReleaseInfo=true \
  -DcreateChecksum=true \
  -DgeneratePom=true
 
 
The users always have to supply the full plugin
 group:artifact-id:version:goal and are not able to use the short-hand
 or the default latest version of the plugin.
 
   Comparing the maven repository files I see that when I install
 the
 plugin on my dev machine using the mvn install command two crucial
 files are created which are absent when the mvn install:install-file
 command is invoked.  These are:
 
 ~/.m2/repositories/com/my/package/maven-metadata-local.xml
 --
 ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?metadata
   plugins
 plugin
   namemaven-mytest-plugin Maven Mojo/name
   prefixmytest/prefix
   artifactIdmaven-mytest-plugin/artifactId
 /plugin
   /plugins
 /metadata
 
 and another one at
 

~/.m2/repositories/com/my/package/maven-mytest-plugin/maven-metadata-loc
 al.xml
 --
 ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?metadata
   groupIdcom.my.package/groupId
   artifactIdmaven-mytest-plugin/artifactId
   version1.1/version
   versioning
 latest1.1/latest
 versions
   version1.1/version
 /versions
 lastUpdated20090312204457/lastUpdated
   /versioning
 /metadata
 
   These two files appear to be crucial in allowing me to invoke
 the
 plugin using the long-hand but not specifying the version and for it
 to default to the latest version and also to allow the short hand
 prefix invocation.
 
   So my questions is what is the correct way of installing such a
 plugin? ... am I missing some crucial step?  I found this link but
 couldn't understand if it applies
 http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/Repository+Metadata
 
   I'm using 2.0.9 writing plugins in java
 
 mvn -version
 Maven version: 2.0.9
 Java version: 1.5.0_16
 OS name: mac os x version: 10.5.6 arch: i386 Family: unix
 
 thanks in advance for you help + kind regards,
 
 Kaveh.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



RE: svn commit: r753302 - in /maven/plugins/trunk/maven-compiler-plugin/src: it/alt-src-output-directories-MCOMPILER-91/ it/alt-src-output-directories-MCOMPILER-91/src/ it/alt-src-output-directories-M

2009-03-13 Thread Brian E. Fox
Yes it is odd, but I share jason's concern that sending the source
folders directly to the compiler plugin is bad because then tools that
look at the pom won't find the sources. (which btw is the case even with
the buildhelper)
-Original Message-
From: Paul Gier [mailto:pg...@redhat.com] 
Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009 4:51 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: svn commit: r753302 - in
/maven/plugins/trunk/maven-compiler-plugin/src:
it/alt-src-output-directories-MCOMPILER-91/
it/alt-src-output-directories-MCOMPILER-91/src/
it/alt-src-output-directories-MCOMPILER-91/src/my-classes/
it/alt-src-output-directori

Yeah, it probably could be done like that.  But it seems a little
strange way to 
accomplish it.
Also that would put all the output into a single directory, and I would
prefer 
to keep the classes separate in the output.

Brian E. Fox wrote:
 Can you do it with multiple compiler executions? I'm thinking
something
 like add all the src folders, and then exclude them in one execution
and
 vice-versa in the other. 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Paul Gier [mailto:pg...@redhat.com] 
 Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009 4:15 PM
 To: Maven Developers List
 Subject: Re: svn commit: r753302 - in
 /maven/plugins/trunk/maven-compiler-plugin/src:
 it/alt-src-output-directories-MCOMPILER-91/
 it/alt-src-output-directories-MCOMPILER-91/src/
 it/alt-src-output-directories-MCOMPILER-91/src/my-classes/
 it/alt-src-output-directori
 
 The build helper plugin allows me to add more source directories, but
 doesn't 
 allow me to have different compiler configurations for the different 
 directories.  And also doesn't allow me to specify separate output
 directories.
 
 I have some situations where it is useful to have two separate test
 sources that 
 are compiled differently and then output to different locations.  For
 the main 
 sources it's not as much of an issue.
 
 Brian E. Fox wrote:
 Why doesn't the buildhelper plugin work for this use case? That lets
 you
 attach many source folders.

 -Original Message-
 From: Paul Gier [mailto:pg...@redhat.com] 
 Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009 2:58 PM
 To: Maven Developers List
 Subject: Re: svn commit: r753302 - in
 /maven/plugins/trunk/maven-compiler-plugin/src:
 it/alt-src-output-directories-MCOMPILER-91/
 it/alt-src-output-directories-MCOMPILER-91/src/
 it/alt-src-output-directories-MCOMPILER-91/src/my-classes/
 it/alt-src-output-directori

 Do you have an issue with it in both the compile and test-compile
 mojos?
 Or is 
 the test-compile mojo ok?
 The test-compile mojo is where I need it because I have multiple sets
 of
 test 
 classes that require different compile parameters.

 Jason van Zyl wrote:
 -1

 I don't want people to start abusing this and directly using
multiple
 
 source directories. This will get abused so fast and is only
required
 by 
 people who have messed up systems.

 On 13-Mar-09, at 8:37 AM, pg...@apache.org wrote:

 Author: pgier
 Date: Fri Mar 13 15:37:13 2009
 New Revision: 753302

 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=753302view=rev
 Log:
 [MCOMPILER-91] Allow source and output directories to be
configured.
 Patch from Peter Janes (peterj).

 Added:



maven/plugins/trunk/maven-compiler-plugin/src/it/alt-src-output-director
 ies-MCOMPILER-91/ 



maven/plugins/trunk/maven-compiler-plugin/src/it/alt-src-output-director
 ies-MCOMPILER-91/pom.xml   
 (with props)



maven/plugins/trunk/maven-compiler-plugin/src/it/alt-src-output-director
 ies-MCOMPILER-91/src/ 



maven/plugins/trunk/maven-compiler-plugin/src/it/alt-src-output-director
 ies-MCOMPILER-91/src/my-classes/ 



maven/plugins/trunk/maven-compiler-plugin/src/it/alt-src-output-director
 ies-MCOMPILER-91/src/my-classes/java/ 



maven/plugins/trunk/maven-compiler-plugin/src/it/alt-src-output-director
 ies-MCOMPILER-91/src/my-classes/java/MyTest.java   
 (with props)



maven/plugins/trunk/maven-compiler-plugin/src/it/alt-src-output-director
 ies-MCOMPILER-91/verify.bsh   
 (with props)
 Modified:



maven/plugins/trunk/maven-compiler-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/maven
 /plugin/CompilerMojo.java 



maven/plugins/trunk/maven-compiler-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/maven
 /plugin/TestCompilerMojo.java 
 Added: 


maven/plugins/trunk/maven-compiler-plugin/src/it/alt-src-output-director
 ies-MCOMPILER-91/pom.xml 
 URL: 


http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/plugins/trunk/maven-compiler-plugin/s

rc/it/alt-src-output-directories-MCOMPILER-91/pom.xml?rev=753302view=au
 to 


 == 
 --- 


maven/plugins/trunk/maven-compiler-plugin/src/it/alt-src-output-director
 ies-MCOMPILER-91/pom.xml 
 (added)
 +++ 


maven/plugins/trunk/maven-compiler-plugin/src/it/alt-src-output-director
 ies-MCOMPILER-91/pom.xml 
 Fri Mar 13 15:37:13 2009
 @@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
 +?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
 +!--
 +  ~ Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
 +  ~ or more

RE: [Maven Deploy Plugin] Add consistency check when specifying POM file and mojo parameters

2009-03-12 Thread Brian E. Fox
You could use the Nexus UI to upload it directly, or if you need to
automate you could use the REST api.

-Original Message-
From: Olivier Billard [mailto:olivier.bill...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2009 7:57 AM
To: dev@maven.apache.org
Subject: [Maven Deploy Plugin] Add consistency check when specifying POM
file and mojo parameters


Hi all,

I would like to propose an enhancement to the maven deploy plugin,
specifically the deploy-file mojo, and to propose a contribution. Please
tell me if this could be interesting for the community.

Among other tasks, my team manages the corporate repository manager
(Nexus),
and the deployment policy of internal/third party artifacts on this
repo. We
have the use case where we would like to specify both POM file AND
artifactId/groupId/version to the maven-deploy-plugin, and we need to
ensure
that this information is consistent.

Currently, no check is done by the mojo, but we would like to add
optional
consistency checking : to verify that there is a perfect match between
POM
file and corresponding mojo parameters.

Would the community be interested with such a contribution to the plugin
?
Did someone met this need, and solved this in another way ?

Thank you for answers,
--
Olivier Billard
-- 
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/-Maven-Deploy-Plugin--Add-consistency-check-when-s
pecifying-POM-file-and-mojo-parameters-tp22477729p22477729.html
Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



RE: Is this the place for archetype questions?

2009-03-12 Thread Brian E. Fox
If it's about developing archetypes, otherwise the user list will have
quicker responses.

-Original Message-
From: Derek Chen-Becker [mailto:j...@chen-becker.org] 
Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2009 4:38 PM
To: dev@maven.apache.org
Subject: Is this the place for archetype questions?

I have a few questions about archetypes but I wasn't sure if this is the
best place to ask them or if there's a better list. Apologies in advance
if this is the wrong place.

Derek

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



RE: Maven Meetup @ Sonatype on March 19th 20th

2009-03-12 Thread Brian E. Fox
As an addendum to the meetup, we're also going to conduct a keysigning
party. For more information about a key signing party, take a look at
these excellent documents for how the ApacheCon party runs:
http://wiki.apache.org/apachecon/PgpKeySigning

Note, that this requires a tiny bit of preparation, and that is simply
to send me your public key ahead of time. This way we can print out the
list for all attendees.

You can export your key like this: gpg --armor --export KEY_ID 
mykey.asc and then send that file to me via email (bri...@infinity.nu or
bri...@sonatype.com)

-Original Message-
From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:jvan...@sonatype.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 10:03 PM
To: Maven Users List
Subject: Maven Meetup @ Sonatype on March 19th  20th

Hi,

For those interested in knowing what Sonatype is working on in the  
Maven community, we're having a Maven Meetup the week before  
EclipseCon in Mountain View.

It's a full day of presentations on Maven and related technologies  
like m2eclipse, Nexus, Tycho, Hudson, NMaven, NAR, FlexMojos and  
more.  That will be followed up by a full day hackathon.

You can see the full description here:

http://www.sonatype.com/people/2009/03/sonatype-maven-meetup-on-march-19
th-20th/

And you can signup to attend here:

https://docs.sonatype.org/display/COMM/Maven+Meetup+on+March+19th+and+20
th+at+Sonatype

We are syncing up with the Hippo folks who are putting on the Maven  
Meetup in Amsterdam (unfortunately the conference organizers didn't  
notice that EclipseCon and ApacheCon are in the same week) as none of  
the Sonatype folks can attend ApacheCon. We are planning to record all  
the sessions on the 19th and so they should be available for everyone  
at ApacheCon.

Thanks,

Jason

--
Jason van Zyl
Founder,  Apache Maven
http://twitter.com/jvanzyl
--

A party which is not afraid of letting culture,
business, and welfare go to ruin completely can
be omnipotent for a while.

   -- Jakob Burckhardt


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



RE: [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.1.0-RC1

2009-03-11 Thread Brian E. Fox
I would change the tag.

-Original Message-
From: John Casey [mailto:jdca...@commonjava.org] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 8:22 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.1.0-RC1

Mistake on my part. I realized it when I started working on the bugfixes

described in this thread. Sorry for the confusion. I'll amend the tag, 
too, if you want...just so it's not sitting out there as 2.1.0.

-john

Brett Porter wrote:
 Just been generally using it and no additional problems.
 
 Just curious - why 2.1.0 in the version that was released instead of 
 2.1.0-RC1? Though we now have the SVN Rev # in there, it could prove 
 confusing for anyone that holds on to it.
 
 Cheers,
 Brett
 
 On 10/03/2009, at 3:00 AM, John Casey wrote:
 
 Hi everyone,

 I've rolled the first release candidate for Maven 2.1.0. It's 
 available at:

 http://tinyurl.com/maven-2-1-0-RC1

(https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-staging-4e4fa4
8c70323f/org/apache/maven/apache-maven/2.1.0/) 


 The staging repository root is at:


https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-staging-4e4fa48
c70323f 


 If you have time, please take a look and see if you can break it!

 BTW, the JIRA version notes for this release are at:

 http://tinyurl.com/maven-2-1-0-jira

(http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500styleN
ame=Htmlversion=14587) 


 If we can't find anything wrong with this release candidate after 
 maybe four or five days at most, I'll call the vote for a release. 
 Hopefully we can coast in on the effort we put forth in the last 
 release, at least to some extent! :-)

 Thanks,

 -john

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

 
 -- 
 Brett Porter
 br...@apache.org
 http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



RE: Migrate Maven Dependency Plugin to use Invoker Plugin for ITs

2009-03-10 Thread Brian E. Fox
Nope, go ahead. The enforcer applies also.

-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Bentmann [mailto:benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 3:36 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Migrate Maven Dependency Plugin to use Invoker Plugin for ITs

Hi,

This is mostly a question to Brian: Any objections if we migrate the 
Dependency Plugin to use the Invoker Plugin instead of SHITTY for the
ITs?

I am asking because MSHITTY-10 will bite us in CI once we upgrade Hudson

to use Maven 2.1.0 or someday 3.x.


Benjamin

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



RE: [vote] promote pdf plugin

2009-03-09 Thread Brian E. Fox
+1

-Original Message-
From: Lukas Theussl [mailto:ltheu...@apache.org] 
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 6:31 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: [vote] promote pdf plugin


Hi,

With Doxia 1.1 released, I'd like to promote the pdf plugin out of the sandbox 
so 
we can release it. Snapshot is deployed:

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/maven/plugins/maven-pdf-plugin/

The site with basic instructions is here:

http://people.apache.org/~ltheussl/maven-pdf-plugin/

Some examples of pdfs created with the plugin are already on-line, eg the 
plugin 
itself 
(http://people.apache.org/~ltheussl/maven-pdf-plugin/maven-pdf-plugin.pdf), 
the Doxia site (http://maven.apache.org/doxia/Doxia.pdf) and the Continuum site 
(http://continuum.apache.org/docs/1.3.2-SNAPSHOT/apache-continuum.pdf).

+1

-Lukas

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



RE: MPIR 2.3-snapshot

2009-03-05 Thread Brian E. Fox
I'm saying it's a minor annoyance now because it only affects people
with snapshots enabled, when it becomes released, it will be annoying
everyone.

-Original Message-
From: Brett Porter [mailto:br...@porterclan.net] On Behalf Of Brett
Porter
Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 11:35 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: MPIR 2.3-snapshot

On 05/03/2009, at 1:39 PM, Brian E. Fox wrote:

 No, I mean, why do we need to set the prereq...i understand how it  
 works
 ;-)
 Can we work it so a prereq isn't needed is the question.

Agree (and it should be possible), was just confused by the later  
portion below that you seemed to say it wasn't working and would cause  
headaches.

- Brett

--
Brett Porter
br...@apache.org
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



RE: Maven2 mirror @ netcologne

2009-03-05 Thread Brian E. Fox
Ibiblio only gets updated once a day starting at 1am CST, so every 2 hours is 
overkill. You could wait until 2am CST and then pull your copy.

-Original Message-
From: Mirror-Service [mailto:mirror-serv...@netcologne.de] 
Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:11 AM
To: dev@maven.apache.org
Subject: Maven2 mirror @ netcologne

Hello Maven Dev-Team,

we would love to setup a mirror of the maven2 repository in Germany.
As there are currently no mirrors in Germany at all, and only two danish
mirrors in europe.

The NetCologne GmbH is a local ISP in the greater Cologne area. Our
machine mirror.netcologne.de currently runs on this hardware:

2x 3Ghz Intel Xeon CPU
2 GB RAM (to be upgraded to 4GB)
3 TB of mirror storage total

The machine currently already mirrors a few linux distros (mainly
debian) and other free software projects.

Regarding internet connectivity, the machine itself has 2 Gigabit/s
uplink. Our backbone is then connected to all major peering points in
europe (DECIX, AMSIX, LINX) with 20 Gbit/s each. We are also peering in
the US (2x EQUINIX) and maintain quite a few private peering with other
ISPs including Deutsche Telekom (DTAG) and the DFN (Deutsches
Forschungsnetz, the German university network).

IPv6 connectivity is coming very soon, so mark that as checked.

We configured the rsync to sync with: mirrors.ibiblio.org::maven2
every two hours in the 42nd minute. Please let me know if that's ok, or
if we need to adjust that. The repo is already available on
[rsync|ftp|http]://mirror.netcologne.de/maven2


If you need to contact me, just mail to crohm...@netcologne.de, as
official contact for the mirror use mirror-serv...@netcologne.de.



-- 
Mit freundlichen Grüßen

Christian Rohmann

---
Network Engineering and Design

Tel.:  +49 221 -5751
Fax.: +49 221 -75751

NetCologne Gesellschaft für Telekommunikation mbH
Am Coloneum 9
50829 Köln

Geschäftsführer: Werner Hanf, Karl- Heinz Zankel, Dipl. Ing.
HRB 25580, AG Köln
www.netcologne.de



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



RE: [VOTE] Release Maven Doxia version 1.1

2009-03-04 Thread Brian E. Fox
-1, the doxia tools release isn't signed:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-staging-4c838f3
8e6b44b/org/apache/maven/doxia/doxia-converter/1.0/

The others looked ok. 

-Original Message-
From: vincent.sive...@gmail.com [mailto:vincent.sive...@gmail.com] On
Behalf Of Vincent Siveton
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 5:35 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: [VOTE] Release Maven Doxia version 1.1

Hi,

We solved more than 100 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=13617styleName
=HtmlprojectId=10780

There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=truepid=10780
status=1

Staging repo:
Doxia
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-staging-4c8268a
400077f/

Doxia Sitetools
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-staging-4c831d5
8591989

Doxia tools
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-staging-4c838f3
8e6b44b/

Staging site:
http://maven.apache.org/doxia

Guide to testing staged releases:
http://maven.apache.org/guides/development/guide-testing-releases.html

Vote open for 72 hours.

[ ] +1
[ ] +0
[ ] -1

Vincent

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



RE: [VOTE] Release Maven Doxia version 1.1

2009-03-04 Thread Brian E. Fox
Ok, The doxia tools are restaged here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-staging-4cc3f47
d7847b8/

+1 (procedural checking, I didn't test them directly, but I did rebuild
the tools and it was ok)


-Original Message-
From: Brian E. Fox [mailto:bri...@reply.infinity.nu] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 8:40 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Maven Doxia version 1.1

-1, the doxia tools release isn't signed:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-staging-4c838f3
8e6b44b/org/apache/maven/doxia/doxia-converter/1.0/

The others looked ok. 

-Original Message-
From: vincent.sive...@gmail.com [mailto:vincent.sive...@gmail.com] On
Behalf Of Vincent Siveton
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 5:35 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: [VOTE] Release Maven Doxia version 1.1

Hi,

We solved more than 100 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=13617styleName
=HtmlprojectId=10780

There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=truepid=10780
status=1

Staging repo:
Doxia
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-staging-4c8268a
400077f/

Doxia Sitetools
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-staging-4c831d5
8591989

Doxia tools
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-staging-4c838f3
8e6b44b/

Staging site:
http://maven.apache.org/doxia

Guide to testing staged releases:
http://maven.apache.org/guides/development/guide-testing-releases.html

Vote open for 72 hours.

[ ] +1
[ ] +0
[ ] -1

Vincent

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



MPIR 2.3-snapshot

2009-03-04 Thread Brian E. Fox
Is there a way to avoid requiring 2.1.0-M2 for the mpir 2.3 snapshot?

 

[INFO] snapshot
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-project-info-reports-plugin:2.3-SNAPSHOT:
checking for updates

from central

[INFO]


[ERROR] BUILD ERROR

[INFO]


[INFO] Error resolving version for
'org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-project-info-reports-plugin': Plugin
requir

es Maven version 2.1.0-M2-SNAPSHOT

 

 

Everytime I build a site, I run into this and I have to go lockdown the
report. This is going to cause massive headaches when this gets
released. It would be nice if Maven could see that the LATEST isn't
compatible and falls back to the latest that is...I know the range code
handles similar logic.

 

--

Brian Fox

Apache Maven PMC

http://blogs.sonatype.com/brian/

 



RE: MPIR 2.3-snapshot

2009-03-04 Thread Brian E. Fox
No, I mean, why do we need to set the prereq...i understand how it works
;-) 
Can we work it so a prereq isn't needed is the question.

-Original Message-
From: Brett Porter [mailto:br...@porterclan.net] On Behalf Of Brett
Porter
Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 10:49 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: MPIR 2.3-snapshot


On 05/03/2009, at 2:29 AM, Brian E. Fox wrote:

 Everytime I build a site, I run into this and I have to go lockdown  
 the
 report. This is going to cause massive headaches when this gets
 released. It would be nice if Maven could see that the LATEST isn't
 compatible and falls back to the latest that is...I know the range  
 code
 handles similar logic.

prerequisites / does that, assuming your metadata is correct. It  
might be ignored if you've installed a snapshot that you've built  
yourself though - I'd need to check. Or perhaps it's not working for  
reports.

- Brett

--
Brett Porter
br...@apache.org
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



RE: Maven 2.1.0 and Doxia

2009-03-03 Thread Brian E. Fox
1.1 is NOT under development anymore, it hasn't been for at least over a year. 
All 
we did was small bug fixes and enhancements that came along on the way because 
there was nothing else to do.

I don't follow this logic, if it's been done for over a year, why has it been 
discussed for the last 3 maven releases and still no release? It only seems 
relevant when a maven release is coming up and then it's a hurry up and wait 
for doxia pattern.


RE: Maven 2.1.0 and Doxia

2009-03-03 Thread Brian E. Fox
The more this thread goes on, the less optimistic I feel about this going into 
2.1. We already know the 2.1M1 is stable and the point was to get it out in a 
release that people can use, ie non-milestone. Making radical changes at the 
last minute is not good for stability and not good for the users. I think this 
should go into 2.2 and there should be a release cut and integrated into the 
2.2 snapshots immediately so we have time to understand the issues. Using a 
maven release to effectively test doxia goes against all the progress we've 
made in the last year to stabilize the releases and improve quality.

(this is the same argument I think I used in 2.0.9, 2.0.10, and since the 
release didn't happen, it's still valid imo)

-Original Message-
From: John Casey [mailto:jdca...@commonjava.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 9:51 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: Maven 2.1.0 and Doxia

Lukas Theussl wrote:
 
 Hi John,
 
 If you would have used the time it took you to write this email for 
 installing and testing Doxia 1.1 you probably wouldn't have to ask 
 anymore if it's a terrible idea. ;)

In my experience, five minutes isn't enough time to do anything when 
you've got more than one snapshot dependency/plugin you're trying to 
use. It's not trivial to replace a whole stack of artifacts with another 
whole stack of artifacts, then dig up a test project that will put the 
snapshots through their paces properly.

 
 However, the main point is that I also see no reason for NOT upgrading 
 now (as I do not accept your FUD arguments). 

This is not merely my blowing smoke and trying to inject fear; we've 
been bitten time and again by bad/untested dependencies that get pushed 
out just ahead of a Maven release. I've spent quite a lot of time in the 
past on the front lines after these releases, answering questions about 
why things are messed up and debugging problems for people to find a 
workaround.

I don't think taking a slightly more conservative view of the release 
process as a result is in any way FUD. These are not unfounded views.


A few people have now taken
 their time to test 1.1 and have provided positive feedback (Brett, 
 Herve, Wendy). Doxia 1.1 (then beta-1) was present in the 2.0.x core for 
 4 months [1], unfortunately it was reverted for the 2.0.10 release [2] 
 for reasons that I do not recall

These reasons were failing tests. I guess we didn't have the test 
coverage in place to figure that out for four months...good thing we're 
all set now, though.

 
 As for the improvements you propose, it certainly sounds good and all, 
 and IIUC along the lines of what Jason is planning for Maven 3 [3], but 
 as long as there is nothing concrete on the table I don't see why we 
 shouldn't use what we have now (ie Doxia 1.1).

IMO, the only thing we know we have now is the released and 
battle-proven versions that went out with the previous release(s). These 
may have warts, but they're known quantities. We don't have a Doxia 1.1, 
that's kind of the point I was trying to make. We *may* have one soon, 
and maybe it'll work or maybe it won't. Maybe it'll introduce a crop of 
bugs that keep us from saying that this Maven release is *definitely* 
progress, *definitely* better.

Our problems with upgrading Doxia in Maven core are not simply 
prejudice, they have a long history of causing really difficult 
problems. This means Doxia has to be subject to extraordinary scrutiny 
before we include a new release in Maven itself.

-john


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



RE: decision on Doxia for 2.1.0?

2009-03-02 Thread Brian E. Fox
Yeah double it up to reduce the overall timeline. 

-Original Message-
From: Brett Porter [mailto:br...@porterclan.net] On Behalf Of Brett
Porter
Sent: Monday, March 02, 2009 5:57 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: decision on Doxia for 2.1.0?

On 02/03/2009, at 9:45 PM, Vincent Siveton wrote:

 2009/3/1, Jason van Zyl jvan...@sonatype.com:
 Why is Doxia dependent on MPIR?

 We can't make mvn site due to MPIR-146.

Ah, sorry for the out of sequence reply. I think it's ok to stage/ 
publish sites using the staged release of MPIR so that version is in  
the release so that the votes can happen concurrently, we do that all  
the time with parents, dependencies, etc.

- Brett

--
Brett Porter
br...@apache.org
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



RE: Maven 2.1.0 and Doxia

2009-03-02 Thread Brian E. Fox

I'm venting because I'm a little frustrated that this conversation came

up back in August and here we are talking about it again...and again,
we 
have no released version of Doxia to consume. So, we're in a position
of 
rushing out a release of Doxia so we can push an unproven dependency 
into Maven just in time for a release. Doesn't this seem like a
terrible 
idea to anyone else?

It does to me, and this is why it got yanked from 2.0.9. 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



RE: stuck on gpg:sign while staging ear plugin

2009-03-01 Thread Brian E. Fox
Maybe it's waiting for the password?

-Original Message-
From: Stephane Nicoll [mailto:stephane.nic...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Sunday, March 01, 2009 10:57 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: stuck on gpg:sign while staging ear plugin

Hey guys,

I am trying to stage EAR plugin 2.3.2 before calling for a vote. I've
followed everything as described on[1] but the mvn process is stuck on
the
gpg sign goal

[INFO] [INFO] [gpg:sign {execution: default}]

I have MacOS 10.5.6 with maven 2.0.9 and gpg 1.4.9

snic...@cobra:~$ gpg --version
gpg (GnuPG) 1.4.9
Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later
http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html

This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.

Home: ~/.gnupg
Supported algorithms:
Pubkey: RSA, RSA-E, RSA-S, ELG-E, DSA
Cipher: 3DES, CAST5, BLOWFISH, AES, AES192, AES256, TWOFISH
Hash: MD5, SHA1, RIPEMD160, SHA256, SHA384, SHA512, SHA224
Compression: Uncompressed, ZIP, ZLIB, BZIP2

I installed gpg with port.

Any idea?

S.


[1] http://maven.apache.org/developers/release/releasing.html

-- 
Large Systems Suck: This rule is 100% transitive. If you build one, you
suck -- S.Yegge

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



RE: decision on Doxia for 2.1.0?

2009-03-01 Thread Brian E. Fox
When can we get 1.1? I think 2.1.0 is essentially ready to go now.

-Original Message-
From: Hervé BOUTEMY [mailto:herve.bout...@free.fr] 
Sent: Sunday, March 01, 2009 2:44 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: decision on Doxia for 2.1.0?

We made tests with Vincent today and found little problems with backward 
compatibility that Vincent fixed immediately.

Now everything is ok for me. I tested Modello's site with success: MPIR, PMD, 
Checkstyle, Surefire and taglist reports were fine (after the fixes...).
I'm now confident that this change will be fully backward compatible with 
every reporting plugin.

then +1 to include Doxia 1.1 in Maven 2.1.0

To have your own test:
- mvn install Doxia and Doxia Site Tools 1.1-SNAPSHOT  (= trunk),
- install and use Maven 2.1-SNAPSHOT after upgrading doxia-sink-api to 
1.1-SNAPSHOT (in main pom.xml)
- mvn install maven-site-plugin 2.1-SNAPSHOT from 
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/plugins/branches/maven-site-plugin-doxia-1.1

Then choose the project of your choice you want to test: upgrade 
maven-site-plugin to 2.1-SNAPSHOT and generate the site.
If you're like me, there are some warnings like [WARNING] Profile with 
id: 'reporting' has not been activated. or [WARNING] A dependency of the 
current project (or of one the plugins used in its build)was found in the 
reactor,
but had not been built at the time it was requested. It will be resolved from 
the repository instead.. But everything works well


HTH

Regards,

Hervé


Le dimanche 01 mars 2009, Dennis Lundberg a écrit :
 This sound like a good plan to me. Release Doxia 1.1 and put it into
 2.1.0. If things start to go horribly wrong pull it out again.

 Brett Porter wrote:
  Hi,
 
  So I did additional testing and while there is no way to do the
  separation without busting things up at this stage, upgrading to Doxia
  1.1 does appear to be backwards compatible (the old and the new site
  plugin work with it, and old and new reports work with the old site
  plugin on the new doxia - got that mouthful? :)
 
  I think John is about to call the other release, so this will be the
  last queued issue for 2.1.0 before starting the RC phase.
 
  So, do we upgrade or postpone?
 
  Doxia 1.1 looks ready to release according to JIRA. So, IMO - if that
  release can be started right away, we can include it for the RC cycle -
  we need to break this deadlock. But at the first sign of major trouble
  it would be back to 1.0. If the release isn't ready to go we would also
  have to stick to 1.0.
 
  Objections?
 
  Cheers,
  Brett
 
  --
  Brett Porter
  br...@apache.org
  http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



RE: MNG-4056, please comment

2009-03-01 Thread Brian E. Fox
Seems logical to me. I don't know why there are these special mappings
in the first place. Sources is the other one that comes to mind... if
true you should handle that the same.

-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Bentmann [mailto:benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu] 
Sent: Sunday, March 01, 2009 9:11 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: MNG-4056, please comment

Hi,

I recently created a patch for MNG-4056 and would appreciate some 
comments whether that's the proper way to address the issue.

In short, this issue is about the subtle difference between

   dependency
 groupIdgid/groupId
 artifactIdaid/artifactId
 version0.1/version
 classifiertests/classifier
   /dependency

and

   dependency
 groupIdgid/groupId
 artifactIdaid/artifactId
 version0.1/version
 typetest-jar/type
   /dependency

i.e. typetest-jar/type vs. classifiertests/classifier. While 
both declarations work during builds of the consumer project that run up

to the install phase, only the latter declaration will allow proper 
dependency resolution from the reactor during an earlier lifecycle phase

like package (see also comments in MNG-2045 [0]).

The cause for this difference is that resolution from the reactor 
matches artifacts by their dependency conflict id which has the form 
gid:aid:type:classifier. For the first dependency declaration above, the

type is jar which doesn't match the type test-jar as used for the 
attached test JAR.

In case matching by dependency conflict id fails, the proposed patch 
falls back to another id I called repository conflict id (well, it 
needed to have a name...). The important difference is that the 
repository conflict id has the form gid:aid:extension:classifier, i.e. 
uses the file extension instead of the type.

The rationale for this approach is the observation that the repository 
layout does not use the artifact type but the file extension to 
distinguish files. In other words, the ids
   gid:aid:test-jar:tests:0.1
and
   gid:aid:jar:tests:0.1
get mapped to the same physical file in the repository, namely
   gid/aid/0.1/aid-0.1/aid-0.1-tests.jar
i.e. there's an aliasing effect in the repository which the patch mimics

for dependency resolution from the reactor.

It solves the problem from a user's perspective but I'm not sure whether

this kind of artifact identity is clean from a design perspective. WDYT?


Benjamin


[0] 
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2045?focusedCommentId=152064page=co
m.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#action_
152064

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



RE: Code provenance checks for Plexus components

2009-02-27 Thread Brian E. Fox
Plexus is a codehaus component, so Apache would most likely not have these 
checks.

-Original Message-
From: Abel Muiño [mailto:amu...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 1:18 PM
To: dev@maven.apache.org
Subject: Code provenance checks for Plexus components


The Eclipse legal team is having a hard time trying to confirm code
provenance for the plexus components required by the 3.0 maven embedder.

I suppose that the Apache Foundation has already done similar provenance
checks before distributing the components... so can you please help us with
the Eclipse review?

Specifically, the legal team has asked:
···


 For example, it would be helpful to know whether Plexus project members
 and
 contributors are asked to acknowledge anything regarding their
 contribution in
 an e-mail (e.g. I wrote the code, it's mine, and I'm contributing it to
 Plexus
 for distribution under the Apache 1.1 or Apache 2.0 license).
 
···

Does such thing (or anything similar) exist? Does Apache keep some records
regarding the 3rd party checks it performs before a release?

Thanks!


-
http://www.linkedin.com/in/amuino Abel Muintilde;o Vizcaino  -  
http://ramblingabout.wordpress.com http://ramblingabout.wordpress.com 
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Code-provenance-checks-for-Plexus-components-tp22251436p22251436.html
Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



RE: settings security: --enc-passwd / --enc-master-passwd options

2009-02-26 Thread Brian E. Fox
+1 for no abbreviations. We have enough crazy options to memorize on the
cli as it is. (ie is it maven.tests.skip or maven.skip.tests?)

-Original Message-
From: Brett Porter [mailto:br...@porterclan.net] On Behalf Of Brett
Porter
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2009 8:52 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: settings security: --enc-passwd / --enc-master-passwd
options


On 27/02/2009, at 12:45 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:

 I thought Oleg asked for the use of the password?

Did you mean plugin?

 I don't want there to be a way in 2.1.x and then it be completely  
 different in the 3.x line. It needs to be the same.

Certainly - would follow with an IT if we agree to have a CLI option  
(and what the spelling should be :)



 On 26-Feb-09, at 3:27 AM, Brett Porter wrote:

 With 2.1.0 imminent, we'll need to finalise on this soon - are the  
 current options satisfactory?

 Cheers,
 Brett

 I have never seen an environment where read-only access to  
 central or central replica is authenticated. Short of that it's  
 just another plugin to be downloaded and used. Or I completely  
 missed the question?

 That's right, it's the situation I was thinking of. I was thinking  
 along the lines of a vetted repository where direct use of central  
 is not used. It's maybe still unlikely that would be  
 authenticated, but I wouldn't rule it out.

 Thinking it through, to me this actually feels a more natural fit  
 in the CLI now, along with the other settings-based operations,  
 pretty much symmetrical with the location of the operation to  
 decode the passwords in the settings file. For a user,  
 manipulation of the settings file is generally a set-up task,  
 before you do anything else. This location also makes it very  
 snappy, not going through the whole plugin cycle, and had very  
 little impact on the code since it was already mostly achieved  
 through the sec-dispatcher and cipher. A plugin for this would see  
 infrequent releases - perhaps none - which seems an odd  
 evolutionary cycle for an independent piece of code.

 Not that tied to it being in the CLI if a suitable replacement is  
 already in place, but I hope this is somewhat convincing :)


--
Brett Porter
br...@apache.org
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



RE: svn commit: r748226 - in /maven/components/trunk/maven-project/src/main/java/org/apache/maven: profiles/ProfilesConversionUtils.java profiles/build/DefaultProfileAdvisor.java profiles/build/Profil

2009-02-26 Thread Brian E. Fox
That doesn't negate the need for an issue and some tracking of these
changes.

-Original Message-
From: Shane Isbell [mailto:shane.isb...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2009 1:57 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: svn commit: r748226 - in
/maven/components/trunk/maven-project/src/main/java/org/apache/maven:
profiles/ProfilesConversionUtils.java
profiles/build/DefaultProfileAdvisor.java
profiles/build/ProfileAdvisor.java project/DefaultMavenProjectBuilder.j

This is permanent. From my understanding, profiles.xml is almost never
used,
so it's not really worth the added complexity of keeping it.

On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 10:35 AM, Benjamin Bentmann 
benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu wrote:

 Hi Shane,

  Author: sisbell
 Date: Thu Feb 26 17:46:01 2009
 New Revision: 748226

 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=748226view=rev
 Log:
 Removed support for profiles.xml


 Will this be re-instantiated later or is this a permanent difference
 between 2.x and 3.x? In the latter case, shouldn't we create JIRAs for
this
 and similar changes (like r747652) to have the breaking changes
visible in
 the release notes somehow? Otherwise I imagine we get some more bug
reports
 from unaware users.


 Benjamin

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



RE: settings security: --enc-passwd / --enc-master-passwd options

2009-02-26 Thread Brian E. Fox
A gui is overkill here.

-Original Message-
From: Oleg Gusakov [mailto:oleg.subscripti...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2009 11:28 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: settings security: --enc-passwd / --enc-master-passwd options



Jason van Zyl wrote:
 This doesn't need to go into the core, I think a plugin is better.
I was thinking about GUI in the plugin - that way we either go by 
-Dsettings-master-password and -Dsettings-server-password or have the 
same options available via swing GUI

Thanks,
Oleg

 On 26-Feb-09, at 6:22 AM, Brian E. Fox wrote:

 +1 for no abbreviations. We have enough crazy options to memorize on the
 cli as it is. (ie is it maven.tests.skip or maven.skip.tests?)

 -Original Message-
 From: Brett Porter [mailto:br...@porterclan.net] On Behalf Of Brett
 Porter
 Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2009 8:52 AM
 To: Maven Developers List
 Subject: Re: settings security: --enc-passwd / --enc-master-passwd
 options


 On 27/02/2009, at 12:45 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:

 I thought Oleg asked for the use of the password?

 Did you mean plugin?

 I don't want there to be a way in 2.1.x and then it be completely
 different in the 3.x line. It needs to be the same.

 Certainly - would follow with an IT if we agree to have a CLI option
 (and what the spelling should be :)



 On 26-Feb-09, at 3:27 AM, Brett Porter wrote:

 With 2.1.0 imminent, we'll need to finalise on this soon - are the
 current options satisfactory?

 Cheers,
 Brett

 I have never seen an environment where read-only access to
 central or central replica is authenticated. Short of that it's
 just another plugin to be downloaded and used. Or I completely
 missed the question?

 That's right, it's the situation I was thinking of. I was thinking
 along the lines of a vetted repository where direct use of central
 is not used. It's maybe still unlikely that would be
 authenticated, but I wouldn't rule it out.

 Thinking it through, to me this actually feels a more natural fit
 in the CLI now, along with the other settings-based operations,
 pretty much symmetrical with the location of the operation to
 decode the passwords in the settings file. For a user,
 manipulation of the settings file is generally a set-up task,
 before you do anything else. This location also makes it very
 snappy, not going through the whole plugin cycle, and had very
 little impact on the code since it was already mostly achieved
 through the sec-dispatcher and cipher. A plugin for this would see
 infrequent releases - perhaps none - which seems an odd
 evolutionary cycle for an independent piece of code.

 Not that tied to it being in the CLI if a suitable replacement is
 already in place, but I hope this is somewhat convincing :)


 -- 
 Brett Porter
 br...@apache.org
 http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org


 Thanks,

 Jason

 --
 Jason van Zyl
 Founder,  Apache Maven
 http://twitter.com/jvanzyl
 --

 Simplex sigillum veri. (Simplicity is the seal of truth.)


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



RE: [vote] release maven-enforcer-plugin 1.0-beta-1

2009-02-25 Thread Brian E. Fox
Results:
Binding: +7 Brian, Jason, Arnaud, Lukas, Vincent, Olivier, Brett
Non binding: +3 Jason Dillon, Oleg, Nicolas

I'll publish the sites and artifacts now.

-Original Message-
From: Brian E. Fox [mailto:bri...@reply.infinity.nu] 
Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2009 10:20 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: [vote] release maven-enforcer-plugin 1.0-beta-1

Time to release a beta with a few bug fixes:

 

Release Notes:

http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=14948styleName
=HtmlprojectId=11530Create=Create

 

Staged site: 

http://people.apache.org/~brianf/staging/people.apache.org/www/maven.apa
che.org/enforcer/

 

Artifacts Staged at:

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-staging-49da452
d70c062/

 

72hrs, +1

 

--

Brian Fox

Apache Maven PMC

http://blogs.sonatype.com/brian/

 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



RE: License for maven 3.0 artifacts

2009-02-24 Thread Brian E. Fox
Yes, they are ASL.

-Original Message-
From: Abel Muiño [mailto:amu...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2009 1:58 PM
To: dev@maven.apache.org
Subject: License for maven 3.0 artifacts


I have not been able to get information about these two artifacts (transitive
dependencies of the maven embedder 3.0). 
I guess that they are licensed under ASL 2.0, but I could not find a public
site with information on licensing or purpose.

* org.sonatype.plexus:plexus-plugin-manager:1.0-alpha-1
* org.sonatype.spice:model-builder:1.3

Can this be confirmed, please?

-
http://www.linkedin.com/in/amuino Abel Muintilde;o Vizcaino  -  
http://ramblingabout.wordpress.com http://ramblingabout.wordpress.com 
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/License-for-maven-3.0-artifacts-tp22188188p22188188.html
Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



RE: New repository for Maven snapshots

2009-02-22 Thread Brian E. Fox
We don't yet have an official cert from infra yet (INFRA-1891). So you need to 
install the current cert, see http://repository.apache.org/ssl for 
instructions. The rest of the info is updated on the release docs of the site, 
but you just need to use apache.snapshots.https / apache.releases.https in your 
server settings with your apache creds.

-Original Message-
From: Stephane Nicoll [mailto:stephane.nic...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2009 12:24 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: New repository for Maven snapshots

Weird ...

caused by: sun.security.validator.ValidatorException: PKIX path building
failed: sun.security.provider.certpath.SunCertPathBuilderException: unable
to find valid certification path to requested target
at sun.security.validator.PKIXValidator.doBuild(PKIXValidator.java:221)
at
sun.security.validator.PKIXValidator.engineValidate(PKIXValidator.java:145)
at sun.security.validator.Validator.validate(Validator.java:203)
at
com.sun.net.ssl.internal.ssl.X509TrustManagerImpl.checkServerTrusted(X509TrustManagerImpl.java:172)
at
com.sun.net.ssl.internal.ssl.JsseX509TrustManager.checkServerTrusted(SSLContextImpl.java:320)
at
com.sun.net.ssl.internal.ssl.ClientHandshaker.serverCertificate(ClientHandshaker.java:841)
... 36 more
Caused by: sun.security.provider.certpath.SunCertPathBuilderException:
unable to find valid certification path to requested target
at
sun.security.provider.certpath.SunCertPathBuilder.engineBuild(SunCertPathBuilder.java:236)
at java.security.cert.CertPathBuilder.build(CertPathBuilder.java:194)
at sun.security.validator.PKIXValidator.doBuild(PKIXValidator.java:216)
... 41 more


On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 5:43 PM, Stephane Nicoll
stephane.nic...@gmail.comwrote:

 What should we do to be able to deploy snapshots again?

 [INFO] Retrieving previous build number from apache.snapshots.https
 [WARNING] repository metadata for: 'snapshot
 org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-ear-plugin:2.3.2-SNAPSHOT' could not be
 retrieved from repository: apache.snapshots.https due to an error: Error
 transferring file
 [INFO] Repository 'apache.snapshots.https' will be blacklisted
 Uploading:
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/maven/plugins/maven-ear-plugin/2.3.2-SNAPSHOT/maven-ear-plugin-2.3.2-20090222.164123-1.jar

 Thanks,
 Stéphane



 On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 2:10 AM, Brian E. Fox bri...@reply.infinity.nuwrote:

 The Maven project has recently moved to a new repository within the
 Apache infrastructure. The repository that was previously at:
 http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository  is deprecated. All
 new snapshots are being deployed to
 http://repository.apache.org/snapshots . Note that this is a logical
 grouping with a proxy of the old repository so the new url can safely
 supersede the old one for other apache projects as well.



 --

 Brian Fox

 Apache Maven PMC

 http://blogs.sonatype.com/brian/






 --
 Large Systems Suck: This rule is 100% transitive. If you build one, you
 suck -- S.Yegge




-- 
Large Systems Suck: This rule is 100% transitive. If you build one, you
suck -- S.Yegge

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



RE: archetype completely broken or just me?

2009-02-22 Thread Brian E. Fox
Ok I probably did have a snapshot since I had built/deployed everything to the 
new repo.

-Original Message-
From: Raphaël Piéroni [mailto:raphaelpier...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2009 1:10 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: archetype completely broken or just me?

Are you using the latest unreleased snapshot ?

If yep, that could be the problem.

The next release will change the default catalog location from internal
(created at release time using MAVENUSER) to
repo1/maven2/archetype-catalog.xml.

Obviously, that release will be postponed until the creation of that file in
repo1 using the nexus index.
 talked with tamas some weeks ago to add this feature (the automatic
creation of the catalog in repo1)

WDYT?

Ragards,

Raphaël

2009/2/21 Brian E. Fox bri...@reply.infinity.nu

 [WARNING] Error reading archetype catalog http://repo1.maven.org/maven2

 org.apache.maven.archetype.source.ArchetypeDataSourceException: Error
 parsing ar

 chetype catalog.

at
 org.apache.maven.archetype.source.CatalogArchetypeDataSource.readCata

 log(CatalogArchetypeDataSource.java:202)

at
 org.apache.maven.archetype.source.RemoteCatalogArchetypeDataSource.ge

 tArchetypeCatalog(RemoteCatalogArchetypeDataSource.java:91)

at
 org.apache.maven.archetype.DefaultArchetype.getRemoteCatalog(DefaultA

 rchetype.java:197)

at
 org.apache.maven.archetype.DefaultArchetype.getRemoteCatalog(DefaultA

 rchetype.java:186)

at
 org.apache.maven.archetype.ui.DefaultArchetypeSelector.getArchetypesB

 yCatalog(DefaultArchetypeSelector.java:278)

at
 org.apache.maven.archetype.ui.DefaultArchetypeSelector.selectArchetyp

 e(DefaultArchetypeSelector.java:74)

at
 org.apache.maven.archetype.mojos.CreateProjectFromArchetypeMojo.execu

 te(CreateProjectFromArchetypeMojo.java:183)

at
 org.apache.maven.plugin.DefaultPluginManager.executeMojo(DefaultPlugi

 nManager.java:453)

at
 org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoals(Defa

 ultLifecycleExecutor.java:559)

at
 org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeStandalone

 Goal(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:513)

at
 org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoal(Defau

 ltLifecycleExecutor.java:483)

at
 org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoalAndHan

 dleFailures(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:331)

at
 org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeTaskSegmen

 ts(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:228)

at
 org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.execute(DefaultLi

 fecycleExecutor.java:142)

at
 org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.doExecute(DefaultMaven.java:336)

at org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.execute(DefaultMaven.java:129)

at org.apache.maven.cli.MavenCli.main(MavenCli.java:301)

at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)

at
 sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.

 java:39)

at
 sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAcces

 sorImpl.java:25)

at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)

at
 org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.launchEnhanced(Launcher.java:315)

at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.launch(Launcher.java:255)

at
 org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.mainWithExitCode(Launcher.java:430)



at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.main(Launcher.java:375)

 Caused by: org.codehaus.plexus.util.xml.pull.XmlPullParserException:
 Unrecognise

 d tag: 'html' (position: START_TAG seen html... @1:6)

at
 org.apache.maven.archetype.catalog.io.xpp3.ArchetypeCatalogXpp3Reader

 .parseArchetypeCatalog(ArchetypeCatalogXpp3Reader.java:529)

at
 org.apache.maven.archetype.catalog.io.xpp3.ArchetypeCatalogXpp3Reader

 .read(ArchetypeCatalogXpp3Reader.java:821)

at
 org.apache.maven.archetype.catalog.io.xpp3.ArchetypeCatalogXpp3Reader

 .read(ArchetypeCatalogXpp3Reader.java:835)

at
 org.apache.maven.archetype.source.CatalogArchetypeDataSource.readCata

 log(CatalogArchetypeDataSource.java:194)

... 24 more

 [INFO] No archetype defined. Using maven-archetype-quickstart
 (org.apache.maven.

 archetypes:maven-archetype-quickstart:1.0)

 Choose archetype:



 --

 Brian Fox

 Apache Maven PMC

 http://blogs.sonatype.com/brian/






RE: New repository for Maven snapshots

2009-02-22 Thread Brian E. Fox
There is now an official certificate on there so there shouldn't be trouble 
going forward.

-Original Message-
From: Stephane Nicoll [mailto:stephane.nic...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2009 1:11 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: New repository for Maven snapshots

Okay that fixes the issue.

Thanks,
Stéphane

On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 6:57 PM, Brian E. Fox bri...@reply.infinity.nuwrote:

 We don't yet have an official cert from infra yet (INFRA-1891). So you need
 to install the current cert, see http://repository.apache.org/ssl for
 instructions. The rest of the info is updated on the release docs of the
 site, but you just need to use apache.snapshots.https /
 apache.releases.https in your server settings with your apache creds.

 -Original Message-
 From: Stephane Nicoll [mailto:stephane.nic...@gmail.com]
 Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2009 12:24 PM
 To: Maven Developers List
 Subject: Re: New repository for Maven snapshots

 Weird ...

 caused by: sun.security.validator.ValidatorException: PKIX path building
 failed: sun.security.provider.certpath.SunCertPathBuilderException: unable
 to find valid certification path to requested target
at sun.security.validator.PKIXValidator.doBuild(PKIXValidator.java:221)
at
 sun.security.validator.PKIXValidator.engineValidate(PKIXValidator.java:145)
at sun.security.validator.Validator.validate(Validator.java:203)
at

 com.sun.net.ssl.internal.ssl.X509TrustManagerImpl.checkServerTrusted(X509TrustManagerImpl.java:172)
at

 com.sun.net.ssl.internal.ssl.JsseX509TrustManager.checkServerTrusted(SSLContextImpl.java:320)
at

 com.sun.net.ssl.internal.ssl.ClientHandshaker.serverCertificate(ClientHandshaker.java:841)
... 36 more
 Caused by: sun.security.provider.certpath.SunCertPathBuilderException:
 unable to find valid certification path to requested target
at

 sun.security.provider.certpath.SunCertPathBuilder.engineBuild(SunCertPathBuilder.java:236)
at java.security.cert.CertPathBuilder.build(CertPathBuilder.java:194)
at sun.security.validator.PKIXValidator.doBuild(PKIXValidator.java:216)
... 41 more


 On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 5:43 PM, Stephane Nicoll
 stephane.nic...@gmail.comwrote:

  What should we do to be able to deploy snapshots again?
 
  [INFO] Retrieving previous build number from apache.snapshots.https
  [WARNING] repository metadata for: 'snapshot
  org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-ear-plugin:2.3.2-SNAPSHOT' could not be
  retrieved from repository: apache.snapshots.https due to an error: Error
  transferring file
  [INFO] Repository 'apache.snapshots.https' will be blacklisted
  Uploading:
 
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/maven/plugins/maven-ear-plugin/2.3.2-SNAPSHOT/maven-ear-plugin-2.3.2-20090222.164123-1.jar
 
  Thanks,
  Stéphane
 
 
 
  On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 2:10 AM, Brian E. Fox bri...@reply.infinity.nu
 wrote:
 
  The Maven project has recently moved to a new repository within the
  Apache infrastructure. The repository that was previously at:
  http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository  is deprecated.
 All
  new snapshots are being deployed to
  http://repository.apache.org/snapshots . Note that this is a logical
  grouping with a proxy of the old repository so the new url can safely
  supersede the old one for other apache projects as well.
 
 
 
  --
 
  Brian Fox
 
  Apache Maven PMC
 
  http://blogs.sonatype.com/brian/
 
 
 
 
 
 
  --
  Large Systems Suck: This rule is 100% transitive. If you build one, you
  suck -- S.Yegge
 



 --
 Large Systems Suck: This rule is 100% transitive. If you build one, you
 suck -- S.Yegge

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org




-- 
Large Systems Suck: This rule is 100% transitive. If you build one, you
suck -- S.Yegge

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



[vote] release maven-enforcer-plugin 1.0-beta-1

2009-02-22 Thread Brian E. Fox
Time to release a beta with a few bug fixes:

 

Release Notes:

http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=14948styleName
=HtmlprojectId=11530Create=Create

 

Staged site: 

http://people.apache.org/~brianf/staging/people.apache.org/www/maven.apa
che.org/enforcer/

 

Artifacts Staged at:

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-staging-49da452
d70c062/

 

72hrs, +1

 

--

Brian Fox

Apache Maven PMC

http://blogs.sonatype.com/brian/

 



RE: svn commit: r746002 - in /maven/components/trunk: maven-core/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/ maven-embedder/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/embedder/ maven-project-builder/ maven-project-bui

2009-02-21 Thread Brian E. Fox
I'll take a look but I'm generally in favor of using Maven to do these things 
rather than duplicating the effort over again in Hudson specific config.

-Original Message-
From: Vincent Siveton [mailto:vincent.sive...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2009 8:45 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: svn commit: r746002 - in /maven/components/trunk: 
maven-core/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/ 
maven-embedder/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/embedder/ maven-project-builder/ 
maven-project-builder/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/project/builde

+1

Vincent

2009/2/21, Hervé BOUTEMY herve.bout...@free.fr:
 oh yes, something like Violations Hudson plugin [1] for example would be a
  great enhancement, since this would be on a central machine and give history.
  Definitely helpful and should not be too complicated to add to existing CI
  instances.
  I'm not a Hudson expert, nor do I really know this plugin: I found it in
  Apache's Hudson instance then read the manual, I even not tried it. If
  anybody knows another plugin, no problem for me: for example, just found
  another one [2] that seems quite equivalent.

  There is still one feature missing: automatic blame when reports get worse on
  a commit. I didn't find anything like this.

  Regards,

  Hervé


  [1] http://wiki.hudson-ci.org/display/HUDSON/Violations

  [2] http://wiki.hudson-ci.org/display/HUDSON/Static+Code+Analysis+Plug-ins

  Le vendredi 20 février 2009, Brian E. Fox a écrit :

  Ok, I mean either enable it all the time, or get some reports or CI etc.
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Dennis Lundberg [mailto:denn...@apache.org]
   Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 11:26 AM
   To: Maven Developers List
   Subject: Re: svn commit: r746002 - in /maven/components/trunk:
   maven-core/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/
   maven-embedder/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/embedder/
   maven-project-builder/
   maven-project-builder/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/project/builder/ ma
  
   We already have it in the Maven parent POM.
  
   When using the reporting profile you get a Checkstyle report for the
   current artifact.
  
   Brian E. Fox wrote:
Why don't we just hookup checkstyle to maven?
   
-Original Message-
From: Hervé BOUTEMY [mailto:herve.bout...@free.fr]
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 7:08 PM
To: dev@maven.apache.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r746002 - in /maven/components/trunk:
maven-core/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/
maven-embedder/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/embedder/
maven-project-builder/
maven-project-builder/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/project/builder/ ma
   
Hi Shane,
   
There are a lot of coding style conventions problems in this commit:
- whitespace,
- implements/throws on a separate line,
   
+private String parentGroupId = null, parentArtifactId = null,
parentVersion = null, parentId = null, parentRelativePath;
   
each attribute should be declared on it own line
   
-import java.io.File;
-import java.io.IOException;
+import java.io.*;
   
no wildcard imports
   
+finally
+{
+if ( out != null )
+{
+out.close();
+}
+}
   
prefer IOUtil.close( out ) from plexus-utils, which has the necessary
try/catch to enforce safe code in any cases (I know this case is
in-memory, then not absolutely necessary)
   
   
Regards,
   
Hervé
   
Le jeudi 19 février 2009, sisb...@apache.org a écrit :
Author: sisbell
Date: Thu Feb 19 21:22:46 2009
New Revision: 746002
   
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=746002view=rev
Log:
Refactored out more uses of modello and moved classes from maven-project
to maven-project-builder. Doing this so that maven-mercury will not have
direct dependency on modello or maven model.
   
[SNAP]
   
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
  For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



archetype completely broken or just me?

2009-02-21 Thread Brian E. Fox
[WARNING] Error reading archetype catalog http://repo1.maven.org/maven2

org.apache.maven.archetype.source.ArchetypeDataSourceException: Error
parsing ar

chetype catalog.

at
org.apache.maven.archetype.source.CatalogArchetypeDataSource.readCata

log(CatalogArchetypeDataSource.java:202)

at
org.apache.maven.archetype.source.RemoteCatalogArchetypeDataSource.ge

tArchetypeCatalog(RemoteCatalogArchetypeDataSource.java:91)

at
org.apache.maven.archetype.DefaultArchetype.getRemoteCatalog(DefaultA

rchetype.java:197)

at
org.apache.maven.archetype.DefaultArchetype.getRemoteCatalog(DefaultA

rchetype.java:186)

at
org.apache.maven.archetype.ui.DefaultArchetypeSelector.getArchetypesB

yCatalog(DefaultArchetypeSelector.java:278)

at
org.apache.maven.archetype.ui.DefaultArchetypeSelector.selectArchetyp

e(DefaultArchetypeSelector.java:74)

at
org.apache.maven.archetype.mojos.CreateProjectFromArchetypeMojo.execu

te(CreateProjectFromArchetypeMojo.java:183)

at
org.apache.maven.plugin.DefaultPluginManager.executeMojo(DefaultPlugi

nManager.java:453)

at
org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoals(Defa

ultLifecycleExecutor.java:559)

at
org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeStandalone

Goal(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:513)

at
org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoal(Defau

ltLifecycleExecutor.java:483)

at
org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoalAndHan

dleFailures(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:331)

at
org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeTaskSegmen

ts(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:228)

at
org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.execute(DefaultLi

fecycleExecutor.java:142)

at
org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.doExecute(DefaultMaven.java:336)

at org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.execute(DefaultMaven.java:129)

at org.apache.maven.cli.MavenCli.main(MavenCli.java:301)

at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)

at
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.

java:39)

at
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAcces

sorImpl.java:25)

at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)

at
org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.launchEnhanced(Launcher.java:315)

at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.launch(Launcher.java:255)

at
org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.mainWithExitCode(Launcher.java:430)

 

at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.main(Launcher.java:375)

Caused by: org.codehaus.plexus.util.xml.pull.XmlPullParserException:
Unrecognise

d tag: 'html' (position: START_TAG seen html... @1:6)

at
org.apache.maven.archetype.catalog.io.xpp3.ArchetypeCatalogXpp3Reader

.parseArchetypeCatalog(ArchetypeCatalogXpp3Reader.java:529)

at
org.apache.maven.archetype.catalog.io.xpp3.ArchetypeCatalogXpp3Reader

.read(ArchetypeCatalogXpp3Reader.java:821)

at
org.apache.maven.archetype.catalog.io.xpp3.ArchetypeCatalogXpp3Reader

.read(ArchetypeCatalogXpp3Reader.java:835)

at
org.apache.maven.archetype.source.CatalogArchetypeDataSource.readCata

log(CatalogArchetypeDataSource.java:194)

... 24 more

[INFO] No archetype defined. Using maven-archetype-quickstart
(org.apache.maven.

archetypes:maven-archetype-quickstart:1.0)

Choose archetype:

 

--

Brian Fox

Apache Maven PMC

http://blogs.sonatype.com/brian/

 



New repository for Maven snapshots

2009-02-21 Thread Brian E. Fox
The Maven project has recently moved to a new repository within the
Apache infrastructure. The repository that was previously at:
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository  is deprecated. All
new snapshots are being deployed to
http://repository.apache.org/snapshots . Note that this is a logical
grouping with a proxy of the old repository so the new url can safely
supersede the old one for other apache projects as well.

 

--

Brian Fox

Apache Maven PMC

http://blogs.sonatype.com/brian/

 



RE: svn commit: r746002 - in /maven/components/trunk: maven-core/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/ maven-embedder/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/embedder/ maven-project-builder/ maven-project-bui

2009-02-20 Thread Brian E. Fox
Ok, I mean either enable it all the time, or get some reports or CI etc.

-Original Message-
From: Dennis Lundberg [mailto:denn...@apache.org] 
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 11:26 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: svn commit: r746002 - in /maven/components/trunk: 
maven-core/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/ 
maven-embedder/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/embedder/ maven-project-builder/ 
maven-project-builder/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/project/builder/ ma

We already have it in the Maven parent POM.

When using the reporting profile you get a Checkstyle report for the
current artifact.

Brian E. Fox wrote:
 Why don't we just hookup checkstyle to maven?
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Hervé BOUTEMY [mailto:herve.bout...@free.fr] 
 Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 7:08 PM
 To: dev@maven.apache.org
 Subject: Re: svn commit: r746002 - in /maven/components/trunk: 
 maven-core/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/ 
 maven-embedder/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/embedder/ 
 maven-project-builder/ 
 maven-project-builder/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/project/builder/ ma
 
 Hi Shane,
 
 There are a lot of coding style conventions problems in this commit:
 - whitespace,
 - implements/throws on a separate line,
 +private String parentGroupId = null, parentArtifactId = null,
 parentVersion = null, parentId = null, parentRelativePath;
 each attribute should be declared on it own line
 
 -import java.io.File;
 -import java.io.IOException;
 +import java.io.*;
 no wildcard imports
 
 +finally
 +{
 +if ( out != null )
 +{
 +out.close();
 +}
 +}
 prefer IOUtil.close( out ) from plexus-utils, which has the necessary 
 try/catch to enforce safe code in any cases (I know this case is in-memory, 
 then not absolutely necessary)
 
 
 Regards,
 
 Hervé
 
 Le jeudi 19 février 2009, sisb...@apache.org a écrit :
 Author: sisbell
 Date: Thu Feb 19 21:22:46 2009
 New Revision: 746002

 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=746002view=rev
 Log:
 Refactored out more uses of modello and moved classes from maven-project to
 maven-project-builder. Doing this so that maven-mercury will not have
 direct dependency on modello or maven model.

 [SNAP]
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
 


-- 
Dennis Lundberg

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



RE: [vote] release asf/maven/maven-plugins/maven-shared poms

2009-02-20 Thread Brian E. Fox
Dennis, can you take another look and hopefully update your vote?

-Original Message-
From: Dennis Lundberg [mailto:denn...@apache.org] 
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 4:15 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: [vote] release asf/maven/maven-plugins/maven-shared poms

-1 on the maven-plugins POM after a quick glance.
It still has a SNAPSHOT version on the tag

http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/plugins/tags/maven-plugins-13/pom.xml
?revision=745340view=markup

Brian E. Fox wrote:
 New parents need to be released with the new distributionManagement
 sections pointed at repository.apache.org:
 
 Apache Pom Diffs:

http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/pom/tags/apache-5/pom.xml?r1=639584r
 2=745325diff_format=h
 
 Staged at:

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging-484a2aeeabd6a
 7/
 
 Diffs:

http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/pom/tags/maven-parent-11/pom.xml?r1=7
 39516r2=745330diff_format=h

http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/plugins/tags/maven-plugins-13/pom.xml
 ?r1=728991r2=745340diff_format=h

http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/shared/tags/maven-shared-components-1
 1/pom.xml?r1=739774r2=745352diff_format=h
 
 Maven Parent and Maven-Plugins Parent Staged at:

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-staging-484a998
 2bc6221/
 
 72hrs, +1
 
 --
 Brian Fox
 Apache Maven PMC
 http://www.sonatype.com/people/author/brian
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
 
 


-- 
Dennis Lundberg

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



RE: [vote] release asf/maven/maven-plugins/maven-shared poms

2009-02-20 Thread Brian E. Fox
Grrr. It's fixed now:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-staging-493287f
5223d96/org/apache/maven/plugins/maven-plugins/13/

FWIW, the release plugin puked on this file because it found a cycle in
the plugins even though I specified the -N flag, so I had to effectively
finish the release by hand and missed the tags.

I found the same problem in the shared one, it's fixed here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-staging-4932ea7
c147076/org/apache/maven/shared/maven-shared-components/11/maven-shared-
components-11.pom

-Original Message-
From: Dennis Lundberg [mailto:denn...@apache.org] 
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 6:16 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: [vote] release asf/maven/maven-plugins/maven-shared poms

ASF and Maven POMs are ok.
+1 for those

The scm section point to trunk for maven-plugins-13. It's the same in
the staged POM.
Still -1 I'm afraid

The staged POM for shared also has an scm section that points to
trunk.
-1


Brian E. Fox wrote:
 Dennis, can you take another look and hopefully update your vote?
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Dennis Lundberg [mailto:denn...@apache.org] 
 Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 4:15 PM
 To: Maven Developers List
 Subject: Re: [vote] release asf/maven/maven-plugins/maven-shared poms
 
 -1 on the maven-plugins POM after a quick glance.
 It still has a SNAPSHOT version on the tag
 

http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/plugins/tags/maven-plugins-13/pom.xml
 ?revision=745340view=markup
 
 Brian E. Fox wrote:
 New parents need to be released with the new distributionManagement
 sections pointed at repository.apache.org:

 Apache Pom Diffs:


http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/pom/tags/apache-5/pom.xml?r1=639584r
 2=745325diff_format=h

 Staged at:


https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging-484a2aeeabd6a
 7/

 Diffs:


http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/pom/tags/maven-parent-11/pom.xml?r1=7
 39516r2=745330diff_format=h


http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/plugins/tags/maven-plugins-13/pom.xml
 ?r1=728991r2=745340diff_format=h


http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/shared/tags/maven-shared-components-1
 1/pom.xml?r1=739774r2=745352diff_format=h

 Maven Parent and Maven-Plugins Parent Staged at:


https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-staging-484a998
 2bc6221/

 72hrs, +1

 --
 Brian Fox
 Apache Maven PMC
 http://www.sonatype.com/people/author/brian


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org


 
 


-- 
Dennis Lundberg

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



RE: Release/staging question

2009-02-20 Thread Brian E. Fox
Best to wait, I just fixed the issues you found, if you change your
vote, we can release them, it's been 72hrs.

-Original Message-
From: Dennis Lundberg [mailto:denn...@apache.org] 
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 6:49 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Release/staging question

Hi

I'm about to stage the release of Doxia Sitetools 1.0. Do I have to wait
for the new parent POMs to come through, and upgrade to those?

Or can I use the deploy.altRepository in my release profile in
settings.xml? If so, should I use the URL
https://repository.apache.org/service/local/staging/deploy/maven2/

-- 
Dennis Lundberg

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



RE: [vote] release asf/maven/maven-plugins/maven-shared poms

2009-02-20 Thread Brian E. Fox
Results:
Binding +8: Brian, John, Jason, Arnaud, Brett, Vincent, Olivier, Dennis
NB +2: Oleg, Mark Struberg

I'll promote the poms.

-Original Message-
From: Dennis Lundberg [mailto:denn...@apache.org] 
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 7:08 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: [vote] release asf/maven/maven-plugins/maven-shared poms

Yep, looks fine now

+1

Brian E. Fox wrote:
 Grrr. It's fixed now:

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-staging-493287f
 5223d96/org/apache/maven/plugins/maven-plugins/13/
 
 FWIW, the release plugin puked on this file because it found a cycle
in
 the plugins even though I specified the -N flag, so I had to
effectively
 finish the release by hand and missed the tags.
 
 I found the same problem in the shared one, it's fixed here:

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-staging-4932ea7

c147076/org/apache/maven/shared/maven-shared-components/11/maven-shared-
 components-11.pom
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Dennis Lundberg [mailto:denn...@apache.org] 
 Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 6:16 PM
 To: Maven Developers List
 Subject: Re: [vote] release asf/maven/maven-plugins/maven-shared poms
 
 ASF and Maven POMs are ok.
 +1 for those
 
 The scm section point to trunk for maven-plugins-13. It's the same
in
 the staged POM.
 Still -1 I'm afraid
 
 The staged POM for shared also has an scm section that points to
 trunk.
 -1
 
 
 Brian E. Fox wrote:
 Dennis, can you take another look and hopefully update your vote?

 -Original Message-
 From: Dennis Lundberg [mailto:denn...@apache.org] 
 Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 4:15 PM
 To: Maven Developers List
 Subject: Re: [vote] release asf/maven/maven-plugins/maven-shared poms

 -1 on the maven-plugins POM after a quick glance.
 It still has a SNAPSHOT version on the tag



http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/plugins/tags/maven-plugins-13/pom.xml
 ?revision=745340view=markup

 Brian E. Fox wrote:
 New parents need to be released with the new distributionManagement
 sections pointed at repository.apache.org:

 Apache Pom Diffs:


http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/pom/tags/apache-5/pom.xml?r1=639584r
 2=745325diff_format=h

 Staged at:


https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging-484a2aeeabd6a
 7/

 Diffs:


http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/pom/tags/maven-parent-11/pom.xml?r1=7
 39516r2=745330diff_format=h


http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/plugins/tags/maven-plugins-13/pom.xml
 ?r1=728991r2=745340diff_format=h


http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/shared/tags/maven-shared-components-1
 1/pom.xml?r1=739774r2=745352diff_format=h

 Maven Parent and Maven-Plugins Parent Staged at:


https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-staging-484a998
 2bc6221/

 72hrs, +1

 --
 Brian Fox
 Apache Maven PMC
 http://www.sonatype.com/people/author/brian



-
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



 
 


-- 
Dennis Lundberg

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



RE: Permission denied to access some artefacts on central repo

2009-02-19 Thread Brian E. Fox
I'll just put a script to fix all the permissions?

-Original Message-
From: Arnaud HERITIER [mailto:aherit...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 5:33 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: Permission denied to access some artefacts on central repo

Jason,

I reported the issue in January but it was fixed by Brian

http://www.nabble.com/Re:-403-errors-td21564203.html

I think rsync will revert your fix :-(

http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/hibernate/hibernate-tools/3.2.3.GA/hiberna
te-tools-3.2.3.GA.jarreturns
a 403 for example. Perhaps a rsync was done since you fix it.

What can we do ?

Is it a problem of setup in our rsync ?

Arnuad

On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Richard Chamberlain 
richard.chamberl...@caplin.com wrote:

 Entity manager 3.4.0 seems to be fixed,
 /hibernate/hibernate-tools/3.2.3.GA/** is still giving me a 403.

 Thanks,

 Richard

 -Original Message-
 From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:jvan...@sonatype.com]
 Sent: 19 February 2009 13:44
 To: Maven Users List
 Subject: Re: Permission denied to access some artefacts on central
repo

 Fixed.

 On 19-Feb-09, at 6:40 AM, Richard Chamberlain wrote:

  Hi,
 
 
 
  When browsing the central repo I get 403-forbidden on a few files.
Is
  there a reason for this?
 
 
 
 

http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/hibernate/hibernate-entitymanager/3.4.0.GA
  /hibernate-entitymanager-3.4.0.GA.jar
 
 

http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/hibernate/hibernate-tools/3.2.3.GA/hiberna
  te-tools-3.2.3.GA.jar
 
 
 
  Thanks
 
 
 
  Richard
 
 
 
 
 

 Thanks,

 Jason

 --
 Jason van Zyl
 Founder,  Apache Maven
 jason at sonatype dot com
 http://twitter.com/jvanzyl
 --

 A man enjoys his work when he understands the whole and when he
 is responsible for the quality of the whole

  -- Christopher Alexander, A Pattern Language


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org




-- 
Arnaud

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



RE: [vote] release asf/maven/maven-plugins/maven-shared poms

2009-02-19 Thread Brian E. Fox
Somehow the tag is messed up, the actual file is ok:
https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging/org/apache/maven/pl
ugins/maven-plugins/13/maven-plugins-13.pom

I'll fix the tag.

-Original Message-
From: Dennis Lundberg [mailto:denn...@apache.org] 
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 4:15 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: [vote] release asf/maven/maven-plugins/maven-shared poms

-1 on the maven-plugins POM after a quick glance.
It still has a SNAPSHOT version on the tag

http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/plugins/tags/maven-plugins-13/pom.xml
?revision=745340view=markup

Brian E. Fox wrote:
 New parents need to be released with the new distributionManagement
 sections pointed at repository.apache.org:
 
 Apache Pom Diffs:

http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/pom/tags/apache-5/pom.xml?r1=639584r
 2=745325diff_format=h
 
 Staged at:

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging-484a2aeeabd6a
 7/
 
 Diffs:

http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/pom/tags/maven-parent-11/pom.xml?r1=7
 39516r2=745330diff_format=h

http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/plugins/tags/maven-plugins-13/pom.xml
 ?r1=728991r2=745340diff_format=h

http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/shared/tags/maven-shared-components-1
 1/pom.xml?r1=739774r2=745352diff_format=h
 
 Maven Parent and Maven-Plugins Parent Staged at:

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-staging-484a998
 2bc6221/
 
 72hrs, +1
 
 --
 Brian Fox
 Apache Maven PMC
 http://www.sonatype.com/people/author/brian
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
 
 


-- 
Dennis Lundberg

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



RE: Permission denied to access some artefacts on central repo

2009-02-19 Thread Brian E. Fox
I wish there was a way to see the actual rsync command, it must be
pulling over the permissions? 

-Original Message-
From: Arnaud HERITIER [mailto:aherit...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 6:04 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: Permission denied to access some artefacts on central repo

which will be launched after each rsync ?
it's a possibility if it's not too long to repair all rigths.

On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 11:46 PM, Brian E. Fox
bri...@reply.infinity.nuwrote:

 I'll just put a script to fix all the permissions?

 -Original Message-
 From: Arnaud HERITIER [mailto:aherit...@gmail.com]
 Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 5:33 PM
 To: Maven Developers List
 Subject: Re: Permission denied to access some artefacts on central
repo

 Jason,

 I reported the issue in January but it was fixed by Brian

 http://www.nabble.com/Re:-403-errors-td21564203.html

 I think rsync will revert your fix :-(


http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/hibernate/hibernate-tools/3.2.3.GA/hiberna

te-tools-3.2.3.GA.jarreturnshttp://repo2.maven.org/maven2/hibernate/hib
ernate-tools/3.2.3.GA/hiberna%0Ate-tools-3.2.3.GA.jarreturns
 a 403 for example. Perhaps a rsync was done since you fix it.

 What can we do ?

 Is it a problem of setup in our rsync ?

 Arnuad

 On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Richard Chamberlain 
 richard.chamberl...@caplin.com wrote:

  Entity manager 3.4.0 seems to be fixed,
  /hibernate/hibernate-tools/3.2.3.GA/** is still giving me a 403.
 
  Thanks,
 
  Richard
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:jvan...@sonatype.com]
  Sent: 19 February 2009 13:44
  To: Maven Users List
  Subject: Re: Permission denied to access some artefacts on central
 repo
 
  Fixed.
 
  On 19-Feb-09, at 6:40 AM, Richard Chamberlain wrote:
 
   Hi,
  
  
  
   When browsing the central repo I get 403-forbidden on a few files.
 Is
   there a reason for this?
  
  
  
  
 

http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/hibernate/hibernate-entitymanager/3.4.0.GA
   /hibernate-entitymanager-3.4.0.GA.jar
  
  
 

http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/hibernate/hibernate-tools/3.2.3.GA/hiberna
   te-tools-3.2.3.GA.jar
  
  
  
   Thanks
  
  
  
   Richard
  
  
  
  
  
 
  Thanks,
 
  Jason
 
  --
  Jason van Zyl
  Founder,  Apache Maven
  jason at sonatype dot com
  http://twitter.com/jvanzyl
  --
 
  A man enjoys his work when he understands the whole and when he
  is responsible for the quality of the whole
 
   -- Christopher Alexander, A Pattern Language
 
 
 
-
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
  For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org
 
 
 
-
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
  For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org
 
 


 --
 Arnaud

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org




-- 
Arnaud

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



RE: Permission denied to access some artefacts on central repo

2009-02-19 Thread Brian E. Fox
It's fixed now. The problem was I fixed org/hibernate/* before not
/hibernate. Anyone know why these same files exist in both paths?

-Original Message-
From: Brian E. Fox [mailto:bri...@reply.infinity.nu] 
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 6:23 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: RE: Permission denied to access some artefacts on central repo

I wish there was a way to see the actual rsync command, it must be
pulling over the permissions? 

-Original Message-
From: Arnaud HERITIER [mailto:aherit...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 6:04 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: Permission denied to access some artefacts on central repo

which will be launched after each rsync ?
it's a possibility if it's not too long to repair all rigths.

On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 11:46 PM, Brian E. Fox
bri...@reply.infinity.nuwrote:

 I'll just put a script to fix all the permissions?

 -Original Message-
 From: Arnaud HERITIER [mailto:aherit...@gmail.com]
 Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 5:33 PM
 To: Maven Developers List
 Subject: Re: Permission denied to access some artefacts on central
repo

 Jason,

 I reported the issue in January but it was fixed by Brian

 http://www.nabble.com/Re:-403-errors-td21564203.html

 I think rsync will revert your fix :-(


http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/hibernate/hibernate-tools/3.2.3.GA/hiberna

te-tools-3.2.3.GA.jarreturnshttp://repo2.maven.org/maven2/hibernate/hib
ernate-tools/3.2.3.GA/hiberna%0Ate-tools-3.2.3.GA.jarreturns
 a 403 for example. Perhaps a rsync was done since you fix it.

 What can we do ?

 Is it a problem of setup in our rsync ?

 Arnuad

 On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Richard Chamberlain 
 richard.chamberl...@caplin.com wrote:

  Entity manager 3.4.0 seems to be fixed,
  /hibernate/hibernate-tools/3.2.3.GA/** is still giving me a 403.
 
  Thanks,
 
  Richard
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:jvan...@sonatype.com]
  Sent: 19 February 2009 13:44
  To: Maven Users List
  Subject: Re: Permission denied to access some artefacts on central
 repo
 
  Fixed.
 
  On 19-Feb-09, at 6:40 AM, Richard Chamberlain wrote:
 
   Hi,
  
  
  
   When browsing the central repo I get 403-forbidden on a few files.
 Is
   there a reason for this?
  
  
  
  
 

http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/hibernate/hibernate-entitymanager/3.4.0.GA
   /hibernate-entitymanager-3.4.0.GA.jar
  
  
 

http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/hibernate/hibernate-tools/3.2.3.GA/hiberna
   te-tools-3.2.3.GA.jar
  
  
  
   Thanks
  
  
  
   Richard
  
  
  
  
  
 
  Thanks,
 
  Jason
 
  --
  Jason van Zyl
  Founder,  Apache Maven
  jason at sonatype dot com
  http://twitter.com/jvanzyl
  --
 
  A man enjoys his work when he understands the whole and when he
  is responsible for the quality of the whole
 
   -- Christopher Alexander, A Pattern Language
 
 
 
-
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
  For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org
 
 
 
-
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
  For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org
 
 


 --
 Arnaud

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org




-- 
Arnaud

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



RE: svn commit: r746002 - in /maven/components/trunk: maven-core/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/ maven-embedder/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/embedder/ maven-project-builder/ maven-project-bui

2009-02-19 Thread Brian E. Fox
Why don't we just hookup checkstyle to maven?

-Original Message-
From: Hervé BOUTEMY [mailto:herve.bout...@free.fr] 
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 7:08 PM
To: dev@maven.apache.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r746002 - in /maven/components/trunk: 
maven-core/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/ 
maven-embedder/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/embedder/ maven-project-builder/ 
maven-project-builder/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/project/builder/ ma

Hi Shane,

There are a lot of coding style conventions problems in this commit:
- whitespace,
- implements/throws on a separate line,
 +private String parentGroupId = null, parentArtifactId = null,
 parentVersion = null, parentId = null, parentRelativePath;
each attribute should be declared on it own line

 -import java.io.File;
 -import java.io.IOException;
 +import java.io.*;
no wildcard imports

 +finally
 +{
 +if ( out != null )
 +{
 +out.close();
 +}
 +}
prefer IOUtil.close( out ) from plexus-utils, which has the necessary 
try/catch to enforce safe code in any cases (I know this case is in-memory, 
then not absolutely necessary)


Regards,

Hervé

Le jeudi 19 février 2009, sisb...@apache.org a écrit :
 Author: sisbell
 Date: Thu Feb 19 21:22:46 2009
 New Revision: 746002

 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=746002view=rev
 Log:
 Refactored out more uses of modello and moved classes from maven-project to
 maven-project-builder. Doing this so that maven-mercury will not have
 direct dependency on modello or maven model.

[SNAP]

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



Re: svn commit: r744288 - in /maven/pom/trunk: asf/pom.xml maven/pom.xml

2009-02-18 Thread Brian E. Fox
As far as I know, I've been using it but haven't cleared my repo. If you
browse it's only going to show stuff that has been proxied, not the entire
contents of p.a.o.


On 2/18/09 10:41 AM, Brett Porter br...@apache.org wrote:

 
 On 15/02/2009, at 2:05 AM, Brian E. Fox wrote:
 
 This is probably moreso for the repositories elements - there's a
 chance some projects will be referring to snapshots in both places.
 The current one is a group that is logically combining the old and new
 repos, there's no reason not to use the r.a.o group for any project
 instead of p.a.o since it is the only place that will have all
 snapshots.
 
 Is this working? I only see a few projects in there. I also see
 metadata from external stuff (opensymphony) which seems wrong.
 
 Thanks,
 Brett
 
 --
 Brett Porter
 br...@apache.org
 http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



RE: svn commit: r744288 - in /maven/pom/trunk: asf/pom.xml maven/pom.xml

2009-02-18 Thread Brian E. Fox
Seems to be proxying just fine:
http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/org/apache/asyncweb/asyncweb-spri
ng/maven-metadata.xml
http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/org/apache/maven/maven-project-bu
ilder/3.0-SNAPSHOT/maven-metadata.xml

-Original Message-
From: Brian E. Fox [mailto:bri...@reply.infinity.nu] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 1:52 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: svn commit: r744288 - in /maven/pom/trunk: asf/pom.xml
maven/pom.xml

As far as I know, I've been using it but haven't cleared my repo. If you
browse it's only going to show stuff that has been proxied, not the
entire
contents of p.a.o.


On 2/18/09 10:41 AM, Brett Porter br...@apache.org wrote:

 
 On 15/02/2009, at 2:05 AM, Brian E. Fox wrote:
 
 This is probably moreso for the repositories elements - there's a
 chance some projects will be referring to snapshots in both places.
 The current one is a group that is logically combining the old and
new
 repos, there's no reason not to use the r.a.o group for any project
 instead of p.a.o since it is the only place that will have all
 snapshots.
 
 Is this working? I only see a few projects in there. I also see
 metadata from external stuff (opensymphony) which seems wrong.
 
 Thanks,
 Brett
 
 --
 Brett Porter
 br...@apache.org
 http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



RE: svn commit: r744288 - in /maven/pom/trunk: asf/pom.xml maven/pom.xml

2009-02-18 Thread Brian E. Fox
Just testing the wrapping problem I seem to have:
http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/org/apache/asyncweb/asyncweb-spri
ng/maven-metadata.xml

-Original Message-
From: Brian E. Fox [mailto:bri...@reply.infinity.nu] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 2:37 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: RE: svn commit: r744288 - in /maven/pom/trunk: asf/pom.xml
maven/pom.xml

Seems to be proxying just fine:
http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/org/apache/asyncweb/asyncweb-spri
ng/maven-metadata.xml
http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/org/apache/maven/maven-project-bu
ilder/3.0-SNAPSHOT/maven-metadata.xml

-Original Message-
From: Brian E. Fox [mailto:bri...@reply.infinity.nu] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 1:52 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: svn commit: r744288 - in /maven/pom/trunk: asf/pom.xml
maven/pom.xml

As far as I know, I've been using it but haven't cleared my repo. If you
browse it's only going to show stuff that has been proxied, not the
entire
contents of p.a.o.


On 2/18/09 10:41 AM, Brett Porter br...@apache.org wrote:

 
 On 15/02/2009, at 2:05 AM, Brian E. Fox wrote:
 
 This is probably moreso for the repositories elements - there's a
 chance some projects will be referring to snapshots in both places.
 The current one is a group that is logically combining the old and
new
 repos, there's no reason not to use the r.a.o group for any project
 instead of p.a.o since it is the only place that will have all
 snapshots.
 
 Is this working? I only see a few projects in there. I also see
 metadata from external stuff (opensymphony) which seems wrong.
 
 Thanks,
 Brett
 
 --
 Brett Porter
 br...@apache.org
 http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



Re: Maven 2.1.0 Plans (a proposal of sorts)

2009-02-17 Thread Brian E. Fox
Sorry, I only read the first part of your email. I think the controlling the
threads with a setting is a good idea.

I don't see any point in doing another milestone release. The current code
is as stable as 2.0.9/10 yet noone can use it because it's a milestone. It
serves us no point because we don't get any feedback. The original intent of
the milestones was to give the team targets to work towards quickly to get
2.1 out. Since no work was made towards those targets in the last 6 months,
we should just cut the release and move on. When a feature appears and is
ready with tests, then we can include it and release it. The nature of the
oss developent timeline is too haphazard to fully schedule releases like we
tried and in the meantime good code sits unused.

I think we should fix the minimum bugs that are regressions, clean up what
is already there and do a 2.1.0 release asap. Everything else can be 2.2
(features) or 2.1.1 (bugs)


On 2/14/09 7:22 AM, Brett Porter br...@apache.org wrote:

 So, there seems to be some agreement.
 
 However, I've come back from underground and now there are *two*
 snapshots on trunk. I'm already spending valentine's day alone, so I
 didn't really need another reason to curl up in the corner and cry :)
 
 I would really like to pull an M2 release in the next week with the
 stuff that is already there. John, what do you think?
 
 Thanks,
 Brett
 
 On 10/02/2009, at 9:43 AM, Brian E. Fox wrote:
 
 Yep good idea.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Brett Porter [mailto:br...@porterclan.net] On Behalf Of Brett
 Porter
 Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 7:44 PM
 To: Maven Developers List
 Subject: Re: Maven 2.1.0 Plans (a proposal of sorts)
 
 
 
 I'm +1 for including it and providing an opt-out switch to turn it
 off. If we can make that switch stick permanently via the
 settings.xml, so much the better.
 
 +1 (even better, configure number of parallel threads, just set it to
 1 to turn it off).
 
 On 09/02/2009, at 11:18 PM, John Casey wrote:
 
 I'll rearrange the JIRA versions today, then...it looks like we're
 all in agreement about moving directly toward 2.1.0 generally.
 
 
 Let's slow down a bit...
 
 We are totally in agreement to moving towards 2.1.0 generally, and the
 list in JIRA now reflects that.
 
 However, I don't see why we'd cancel a milestone release when there's
 already been good progress. I was all ready to roll that once the
 remaining snapshot was released (I've been working on it since
 December since you said you didn't have time), but now JIRA has been
 transformed and any release is 23 issues (I'm guessing probably 2
 weeks minimum) away. Then the RC cycle will be more brutal.
 
 Why couldn't we stick to the plan as it was yesterday? Same issues,
 more intermediate releases.
 
 - Brett
 
 --
 Brett Porter
 br...@apache.org
 http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
 
 
 --
 Brett Porter
 br...@apache.org
 http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Doxia version 1.0

2009-02-17 Thread Brian E. Fox
I'll copy the artifacts to a staging repo for you tonight and then you can
promote it when the vote is closed.


On 2/17/09 1:25 PM, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org wrote:

 +1 from me
 
 Dennis Lundberg wrote:
 Hi,
 
 (resending due to SMTP-server problems)
 
 The time has finally come to release Doxia 1.0. For more info on the
 relationship to plugins and other components, see the Doxia Release Plan at
 http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/Doxia+Release+Plan
 
 We've solved 1 issue:
 http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10780styleName=Ht
 mlversion=14834
 
 There are still lots of issues left in JIRA, but they will go into later
 versions:
 http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=truepid=10780stat
 us=1
 
 Staging repo:
 http://people.apache.org/~dennisl/staging-repo/doxia/
 
 Staging site:
 http://maven.apache.org/doxia/doxia-1.0.x/staging/
 
 Well, at least it should be there, but I'm bitten by
 http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSITE-384 so I can't deploy the full
 staging site from my Windows box. I tried to deploy it using Ubuntu
 running in Virtual Box, but that hasn't worked out completely either. If
 someone with a non-Windows box could check out
 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/doxia/doxia/tags/doxia-1.0/ and
 the run 'mvn package site:stage-deploy' on it I'd sure appreciate it.
 
 Guide to testing staged releases:
 http://maven.apache.org/guides/development/guide-testing-releases.html
 
 Vote open for 72 hours.
 
 [ ] +1
 [ ] +0
 [ ] -1
 
 
 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



RE: Maven 2.1.0 Plans (a proposal of sorts)

2009-02-17 Thread Brian E. Fox
Well lets get a release then so we have something to try. It's been a
waiting game it seems so far. If there's a release we can integrate soon
enough into the cycle, then we have a chance of detecting and fixing any
issues. It always seems to come up far too late in the cycle to do
anything about it. So I say if we want to get it included, then let's
have a release right away

-Original Message-
From: Dennis Lundberg [mailto:denn...@apache.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 6:50 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: Maven 2.1.0 Plans (a proposal of sorts)

I'm undecided about what version number to use, and leave that decision
to others.

One issue that I strongly feel needs to go into 2.1.0 final is MNG-3602,
the inclusion of Doxia 1.1 into the core. According to the release plan
for Doxia [1], Lukas had agreed to release Doxia 1.1. If he's not
available to do it I can do it.

[1] http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/Doxia+Release+Plan

John Casey wrote:
 I fully agree with Brian about the version naming for the next
release.
 Given its track record over the last 6 months, using -M1 for the last
 release crippled it unfairly in the public view; it's at least as
stable
 as 2.0.9, even with the problems we had concerning wagon 1.0-beta-4.
 
 IMO, there is absolutely no reason to do another milestone release. We
 should be moving toward 2.1.0 final, resolving the worst regressions
and
 the most watched/voted-for issues before doing so. Currently, we have
 what looks like 4 major issues still unresolved in the 2.1.0 bucket,
 judging from the votes. Three of these are in progress, I think. I
know
 I'm working on MNG-3057, for instance, and I thought Oleg was working
on
 MNG-553 still...Brett, are you still working on MNG-3379, and did you
 plan to finish that before we release 2.1.0? The fourth top issue
seems
 on the face of it to be based on a common misunderstanding about how
 profiles are triggered and applied...probably more of a
 documentation/education task than anything else.
 
 Beyond that, I'm alright releasing 2.1.0 final provided we can be sure
 that the wagon version we're using is stable. I seem to remember an
 issue coming up shortly after the release of 2.1.0-M1 related to one
of
 the new Wagon implementations - WebDAV, maybe? I'm having some trouble
 remembering/finding that issue in my gmail, but we need to make sure
 that doesn't get left out of this release. If it means rolling back to
 an older wagon version, then let's do that.
 
 I'm not in favor of releasing another milestone of 2.1.0 at this
point.
 Sure, we should have done more work to execute that release plan last
 fall. I for one got very sidetracked putting together a build farm
that
 we can use to help verify future releases of Maven proactively. In any
 case, I think the value of milestone releases is greatly diminished at
 this point, and we need to get serious about 2.1.0 final. We can push
 off the non-critical JIRAs currently slated for 2.1.0 into the 2.1.1
 bucket, and get on with it once we have these four dealt with.
 
 -john
 
 Brett Porter wrote:
 So, there seems to be some agreement.

 However, I've come back from underground and now there are *two*
 snapshots on trunk. I'm already spending valentine's day alone, so I
 didn't really need another reason to curl up in the corner and cry :)

 I would really like to pull an M2 release in the next week with the
 stuff that is already there. John, what do you think?

 Thanks,
 Brett

 On 10/02/2009, at 9:43 AM, Brian E. Fox wrote:

 Yep good idea.

 -Original Message-
 From: Brett Porter [mailto:br...@porterclan.net] On Behalf Of Brett
 Porter
 Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 7:44 PM
 To: Maven Developers List
 Subject: Re: Maven 2.1.0 Plans (a proposal of sorts)



 I'm +1 for including it and providing an opt-out switch to turn it
 off. If we can make that switch stick permanently via the
 settings.xml, so much the better.

 +1 (even better, configure number of parallel threads, just set it
to
 1 to turn it off).

 On 09/02/2009, at 11:18 PM, John Casey wrote:

 I'll rearrange the JIRA versions today, then...it looks like we're
 all in agreement about moving directly toward 2.1.0 generally.


 Let's slow down a bit...

 We are totally in agreement to moving towards 2.1.0 generally, and
the
 list in JIRA now reflects that.

 However, I don't see why we'd cancel a milestone release when
there's
 already been good progress. I was all ready to roll that once the
 remaining snapshot was released (I've been working on it since
 December since you said you didn't have time), but now JIRA has been
 transformed and any release is 23 issues (I'm guessing probably 2
 weeks minimum) away. Then the RC cycle will be more brutal.

 Why couldn't we stick to the plan as it was yesterday? Same issues,
 more intermediate releases.

 - Brett

 -- 
 Brett Porter
 br...@apache.org
 http://blogs.exist.com/bporter

RE: [VOTE] Release Maven Doxia version 1.0

2009-02-17 Thread Brian E. Fox
The new staging repo location is:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-staging-4847e34
062fc70/

Just double check that everything looks ok to you.

-Original Message-
From: Dennis Lundberg [mailto:denn...@apache.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 2:26 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Doxia version 1.0

Thanks Brian.

I'm reading up on the new repo as we speak.

Brian E. Fox wrote:
 I'll copy the artifacts to a staging repo for you tonight and then you
can
 promote it when the vote is closed.
 
 
 On 2/17/09 1:25 PM, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org wrote:
 
 +1 from me

 Dennis Lundberg wrote:
 Hi,

 (resending due to SMTP-server problems)

 The time has finally come to release Doxia 1.0. For more info on the
 relationship to plugins and other components, see the Doxia Release
Plan at
 http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/Doxia+Release+Plan

 We've solved 1 issue:

http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10780styleNa
me=Ht
 mlversion=14834

 There are still lots of issues left in JIRA, but they will go into
later
 versions:

http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=truepid=10780
stat
 us=1

 Staging repo:
 http://people.apache.org/~dennisl/staging-repo/doxia/

 Staging site:
 http://maven.apache.org/doxia/doxia-1.0.x/staging/

 Well, at least it should be there, but I'm bitten by
 http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSITE-384 so I can't deploy the full
 staging site from my Windows box. I tried to deploy it using Ubuntu
 running in Virtual Box, but that hasn't worked out completely
either. If
 someone with a non-Windows box could check out
 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/doxia/doxia/tags/doxia-1.0/
and
 the run 'mvn package site:stage-deploy' on it I'd sure appreciate
it.

 Guide to testing staged releases:

http://maven.apache.org/guides/development/guide-testing-releases.html

 Vote open for 72 hours.

 [ ] +1
 [ ] +0
 [ ] -1


 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
 
 


-- 
Dennis Lundberg

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



[vote] release asf/maven/maven-plugins/maven-shared poms

2009-02-17 Thread Brian E. Fox
New parents need to be released with the new distributionManagement
sections pointed at repository.apache.org:

Apache Pom Diffs:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/pom/tags/apache-5/pom.xml?r1=639584r
2=745325diff_format=h

Staged at:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging-484a2aeeabd6a
7/

Diffs:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/pom/tags/maven-parent-11/pom.xml?r1=7
39516r2=745330diff_format=h
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/plugins/tags/maven-plugins-13/pom.xml
?r1=728991r2=745340diff_format=h
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/shared/tags/maven-shared-components-1
1/pom.xml?r1=739774r2=745352diff_format=h

Maven Parent and Maven-Plugins Parent Staged at:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-staging-484a998
2bc6221/

72hrs, +1

--
Brian Fox
Apache Maven PMC
http://www.sonatype.com/people/author/brian


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



RE: [PROPOSAL] Start using bugtraq in our subversion repository

2009-02-15 Thread Brian E. Fox
Nope it's just another one of the bugtraq options that can take a regex.
Been a few years since I looked at it so I don't recall the exact
setting. 

-Original Message-
From: Dennis Lundberg [mailto:denn...@apache.org] 
Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2009 9:48 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Start using bugtraq in our subversion repository

I wasn't aware that you could use it as a reminder. Would that require
some pre-commit hooks to work?

Brian E. Fox wrote:
 You can regexp the comment to make sure every comment has an issue in
 it, and you can tweak the dialog so it has a prompt for the issue.
 Otherwise it doesn't do much else that I recall...it's just an
 aid/reminder to get the issue in the comment.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Benjamin Bentmann [mailto:benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu] 
 Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 12:01 PM
 To: Maven Developers List
 Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Start using bugtraq in our subversion
repository
 
 Dennis Lundberg wrote:
 
 I would like to start using bugtraq [1] in our subversion
 repositories.
 If we set a bunch of svn properties in the repository, then version
 control tools can link to issues in JIRA.
 
 +1.
 
 Will it automatically parse [MNG-] or does a committer need to
take 
 special steps?
 
 
 Benjamin
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
 
 


-- 
Dennis Lundberg

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



RE: [vote] release maven 2.0.10

2009-02-15 Thread Brian E. Fox
Vote results:
Binding: +10 -- Brian, Jason, Olivier, John, Arnaud, Ben, Vincent,
Stephane, Herve, Brett
Non Binding: +4 --  Raphael, Oleg, Henry, Mark

The vote is successful, I will promote the artifacts and produce the
release notes and setup the distribution.

-Original Message-
From: Brian E. Fox [mailto:bri...@reply.infinity.nu] 
Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 11:32 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: [vote] release maven 2.0.10

It's finally time after 8 Release Candidates:

 

Issues fixed:

http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=14112styleName
=HtmlprojectId=10500Create=Create

 

NOTE: The urls below are using a self-signed certificate. 

There is an issue requesting an official cert at:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1891

 

Staging repo:

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-staging-45dca90
660cc84/

 

Binaries are at:

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-staging-45dca90
660cc84/org/apache/maven/apache-maven/2.0.10/

 

Guide to testing staged releases:

http://maven.apache.org/guides/development/guide-testing-releases.html

 

Vote open for 72 hours.

 

[ ] +1

[ ] +0

[ ] -1

 

--

Brian Fox

Apache Maven PMC

http://www.sonatype.com/people/author/brian/


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



RE: svn commit: r744288 - in /maven/pom/trunk: asf/pom.xml maven/pom.xml

2009-02-14 Thread Brian E. Fox



Isn't modifying the ASF POM premature? I'm not sure if other projects  
are using the POM or not (they should be), but they may not be using  
this system.
There are a few other projects looking to use the new structure and this
would make it easier for them to do. Projects not using the new repo can
continue to use the 4.x versions of the pom. There's no requirement for
them to have the last parent for these purposes. It's either that or we
fork the parent. I don't think it's a great idea to require every
project to overload the same things over and over.



 +  pluginRepositories
 +pluginRepository
 +  idapache.snapshots/id
 +  nameApache Snapshot Repository/name
 +  urlhttp://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots// 
 url
 +  releases
 +enabledfalse/enabled
 +  /releases
 +/pluginRepository
 +  /pluginRepositories

Isn't this badness for pre-Maven 2.0.9 users?

It only applies to building our stuff, which often requires plugin
snapshots anyway. It shouldn't hurt their builds, unless I'm not
thinking of something. 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



RE: svn commit: r744288 - in /maven/pom/trunk: asf/pom.xml maven/pom.xml

2009-02-14 Thread Brian E. Fox


I do like the hook to get people to actually use the parent POM, but  
at the same time it feels back to front (We probably don't need  
another pom release, but if we did that would then have to be a  
fork...). What about having them use the properties as their distMgmt  
settings for now?

We can put a property in the release section as well that can be
overridden I guess. Having consistent overridable properties ASF wide is
important as it more easily lets users build and deploy versions
internally without hacking the poms.


This is probably moreso for the repositories elements - there's a  
chance some projects will be referring to snapshots in both places.
The current one is a group that is logically combining the old and new
repos, there's no reason not to use the r.a.o group for any project
instead of p.a.o since it is the only place that will have all
snapshots.





 +  pluginRepositories
 +pluginRepository
 +  idapache.snapshots/id
 +  nameApache Snapshot Repository/name
 +  urlhttp://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots//
 url
 +  releases
 +enabledfalse/enabled
 +  /releases
 +/pluginRepository
 +  /pluginRepositories

 Isn't this badness for pre-Maven 2.0.9 users?

 It only applies to building our stuff, which often requires plugin
 snapshots anyway. It shouldn't hurt their builds, unless I'm not
 thinking of something.

If they haven't given a version for a plugin that is hosted at Apache,  
they start getting snapshots resolved for it.



 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org


--
Brett Porter
br...@apache.org
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



RE: [vote] release maven 2.0.10

2009-02-14 Thread Brian E. Fox
Yep, I'll double check it before I call the vote and push the site
(probably tonight or tomorrow) and update it appropriately.

-Original Message-
From: paulus.benedic...@gmail.com [mailto:paulus.benedic...@gmail.com]
On Behalf Of Paul Benedict
Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2009 3:51 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: [vote] release maven 2.0.10

If the --showVersion patch wasn't applied to 2.0.10, can someone
check? I'd like to bump the ticket to 2.0.11 so it does not appear in
this version's release notes before it gets published.

Paul

On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 7:03 AM, Brett Porter br...@apache.org wrote:
 ++1

 I ran the integration tests as confirmation.

 On 10/02/2009, at 12:32 PM, Brian E. Fox wrote:

 It's finally time after 8 Release Candidates:



 Issues fixed:


http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=14112styleName
 =HtmlprojectId=10500Create=Create



 NOTE: The urls below are using a self-signed certificate.

 There is an issue requesting an official cert at:
 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1891



 Staging repo:


https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-staging-45dca90
 660cc84/



 Binaries are at:


https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-staging-45dca90
 660cc84/org/apache/maven/apache-maven/2.0.10/



 Guide to testing staged releases:


http://maven.apache.org/guides/development/guide-testing-releases.html



 Vote open for 72 hours.



 [ ] +1

 [ ] +0

 [ ] -1



 --

 Brian Fox

 Apache Maven PMC

 http://www.sonatype.com/people/author/brian/


 --
 Brett Porter
 br...@apache.org
 http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



RE: [VOTE] Release mercury-1.0-alpha-5

2009-02-13 Thread Brian E. Fox
+1

-Original Message-
From: Oleg Gusakov [mailto:oleg.subscripti...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 12:58 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: [VOTE] Release mercury-1.0-alpha-5

Hi,

Main reason for this release - bug fixes. A lot of testing done on the 
repository side, IT coverage on repository components is 60-70 %

We solved 11 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MERCURY/fixforversion/14955

Staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-staging-4630e65601be12/

Staging site: published and will be synced to:
http://maven.apache.org/mercury/staging/

Guide to testing staged releases:
http://maven.apache.org/guides/development/guide-testing-releases.html

Vote open for 72 hours.

[ ] +1
[ ] +0
[ ] -1


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



RE: [VOTE] Release Maven Doxia version 1.0

2009-02-12 Thread Brian E. Fox
It must replace the old process because we can't accurately sync to
central the same artifacts from two places. The metadata will get hosed.
Go ahead with the vote, and then I'll do the promotion via Nexus for
you.

-Original Message-
From: Dennis Lundberg [mailto:denn...@apache.org] 
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 11:18 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Doxia version 1.0

Sorry, but I haven't followed the threads about the Nexus repo as much
as would have liked. Are you saying that it has completely replaced the
old file based release repo at ASF? And that the only way to release an
ASF artifact is through the Nexus instance?

If it's possible I'd like to continue this release with the artifacts
that were already built. I've been through hell and back already trying
to get this release out the door.

Brian E. Fox wrote:
 Dennis, your call. If you want to respin the release with the new
 distMgt and stage it to Nexus, that will work. Otherwise, I'll have to
 manually import your existing artifacts to the new system so they get
 merged correctly. I don't mind either way since I'm still working on
 getting the poms fixed up.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:jvan...@sonatype.com] 
 Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 8:37 PM
 To: Maven Developers List
 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Doxia version 1.0
 
 Brian has moved everything over to the Nexus instance and we can't  
 manage artifact in two separate repositories. Brian wrote up full  
 documentation and staging to Nexus is pretty easy, and then promoting

 is dead simple.
 
 On 11-Feb-09, at 5:56 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
 
 Hi,

 (resending due to SMTP-server problems)

 The time has finally come to release Doxia 1.0. For more info on the
 relationship to plugins and other components, see the Doxia Release  
 Plan at
 http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/Doxia+Release+Plan

 We've solved 1 issue:


http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10780styleNa
 me=Htmlversion=14834
 There are still lots of issues left in JIRA, but they will go into  
 later
 versions:


http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=truepid=10780
 status=1
 Staging repo:
 http://people.apache.org/~dennisl/staging-repo/doxia/

 Staging site:
 http://maven.apache.org/doxia/doxia-1.0.x/staging/

 Well, at least it should be there, but I'm bitten by
 http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSITE-384 so I can't deploy the full
 staging site from my Windows box. I tried to deploy it using Ubuntu
 running in Virtual Box, but that hasn't worked out completely  
 either. If
 someone with a non-Windows box could check out
 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/doxia/doxia/tags/doxia-1.0/
and
 the run 'mvn package site:stage-deploy' on it I'd sure appreciate it.

 Guide to testing staged releases:

http://maven.apache.org/guides/development/guide-testing-releases.html

 Vote open for 72 hours.

 [ ] +1
 [ ] +0
 [ ] -1


 -- 
 Dennis Lundberg


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

 
 Thanks,
 
 Jason
 
 --
 Jason van Zyl
 Founder,  Apache Maven
 jason at sonatype dot com
 --
 
 A party which is not afraid of letting culture,
 business, and welfare go to ruin completely can
 be omnipotent for a while.
 
-- Jakob Burckhardt
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
 
 


-- 
Dennis Lundberg

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



RE: [PROPOSAL] Start using bugtraq in our subversion repository

2009-02-12 Thread Brian E. Fox
You can regexp the comment to make sure every comment has an issue in
it, and you can tweak the dialog so it has a prompt for the issue.
Otherwise it doesn't do much else that I recall...it's just an
aid/reminder to get the issue in the comment.

-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Bentmann [mailto:benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu] 
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 12:01 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Start using bugtraq in our subversion repository

Dennis Lundberg wrote:

 I would like to start using bugtraq [1] in our subversion
repositories.
 If we set a bunch of svn properties in the repository, then version
 control tools can link to issues in JIRA.

+1.

Will it automatically parse [MNG-] or does a committer need to take 
special steps?


Benjamin

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



RE: [PROPOSAL] Start using bugtraq in our subversion repository

2009-02-11 Thread Brian E. Fox
Doesn't jira already scrape the svn repo for the tickets? I used the
bugtraq stuff before and seem to recall that it only helps for clients
that pay attention to it, so it's not an enforcement tool. That said, it
does make life a little easier if you do have a client that obeys it.

-Original Message-
From: Dennis Lundberg [mailto:denn...@apache.org] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 5:52 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: [PROPOSAL] Start using bugtraq in our subversion repository

Hi

I would like to start using bugtraq [1] in our subversion repositories.
If we set a bunch of svn properties in the repository, then version
control tools can link to issues in JIRA.

What do you think?


[1] http://tortoisesvn.net/issuetracker_integration

-- 
Dennis Lundberg

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >