Re: Md5sum failed
On 14.02.2014 03:16, njia1297-ubu...@yahoo.com wrote: Checksums do not match... thought someone should know. Can you provide more information? Which file did you check? Where did you download it from ? -Andre == William - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: User data storage
On 14.02.2014 08:52, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: Hi, On 13.02.2014 21:09, jonasalfreds...@gmail.com wrote: I recommend the DevGuide [1] and the related configuration chapter. And SDK contains a sample in Java that shows how to access the configuration. I'm new to this and has just recently completed my first build of the aoo. The code I'm looking at is C++ in the cui module and not Java. Is it not right that Java is used for users to develop extensions and addins not for correcting aoo bugs. My aim is to commit a bugfix to the aoo codebase. What I am looking for is pointers into the C++ codebase where user configuration is read and written. Some time ago I have written a simple class for accessing the configuration: header: sd/source/ui/inc/tools/ConfigurationAccess.hxx implementation: sd/source/ui/tools/ConfigurationAccess.cxx used here: sd/source/framework/module/ModuleController.cxx and here: sd/source/ui/sidebar/RecentlyUsedMasterPages.cxx once you know the UNO intefaces to implement and services to use you can find other examples via OpenGrok (http://opengrok.adfinis-sygroup.org/source/) -Andre Is this not the correct forum for aoo developers, but aoo addin developers? This is the general mailing list for AOO - it is the right place for your requests. I think Jürgen pointed you to the DevGuide as the configuration is also available via the UNO-API and thus can be used by extension developers. To get familiar with the configuration management this is a good start, I think. You probably have to define a new schema first to store your data. For testing you can do that via an extension and you can use Java to play around with the API. The same API is also available in the C++ code. Thus, the code used in an extension could be converted into C++ code. Best regards, Oliver. [1] https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/DevGuide/Config/Configuration_Management Juergen /Jonas -- View this message in context: http://openoffice.2283327.n4.nabble.com/User-data-storage-tp4658954p4658974.html Sent from the Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: US_inprogress folder went missing during the build
@Regina I did build with -P option for the reason to speed up the building process. This is the command I use in the build: build --all -P2 -- -P2, and then I did also try build --all, result still the same. I didn't configure any thing including the --with-lang option. So I leave it default. FYI, my development PC consist of Ubuntu 13.04 64bit, i5-2400 @ 3.10GHz with 8GB RAM. :o) On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 10:32 PM, Regina Henschel rb.hensc...@t-online.dewrote: Hi, I build for Windows, but perhaps there are similar problems on Linux: Do you try to build with option -P ? I found, that -P4 does never work for me, but building without that option works. What is your value for --with-lang in configure? It seems to me that wrong values are not detected before packing. Kind regards Regina LOH KOK HOE schrieb: I have remove the unxingx6.pro and rebuild, error still persist. I'm having this error being shown during the build: ** ERROR: Saved logfile: /home/kokhoe/workspace/aoo-trunk/main/instsetoo_native/ unxlngx6.pro/Apache_OpenOffice/deb/logging/en-US/log_AOO410_en-US.log ** Thu Feb 13 21:52:37 2014 (00:08 min.) dmake: Error code 255, while making 'openoffice_en-US.deb' 1 module(s): instsetoo_native need(s) to be rebuilt Reason(s): ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making /home/kokhoe/workspace/aoo-trunk/main/instsetoo_native/util When you have fixed the errors in that module you can resume the build by running: build --all:instsetoo_native On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 5:04 PM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann orwittm...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, On 12.02.2014 15:18, LOH KOK HOE wrote: As I following the guidelinehttps://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Building_ installation_packages on building the AOO, I got following error shown in the log file, the log file were locate at AOO-ROOT/main/instsetoo_native/ unxlngx6.pro/Apache_OpenOffice/deb/logging/en-US directory, and the file name was log_AOO410_en-US.log. *** ERROR: More than one new package in directory /home/kokhoe/workspace/aoo-trunk/main/instsetoo_native/ unxlngx6.pro/Apache_OpenOffice/deb/install/en-US_inprogress/DEBS ( /home/kokhoe/workspace/aoo-trunk/main/instsetoo_native/ unxlngx6.pro/Apache_OpenOffice/deb/install/en-US_ inprogress/DEBS/openoffice-writer-4.0.0-1-linux-3.8-x86_ 64.deb/home/kokhoe/workspace/aoo-trunk/main/instsetoo_native/ unxlngx6.pro/Apache_OpenOffice/deb/install/en-US_ inprogress/DEBS/openoffice-writer-4.0.0-1-linux-3.8-x86_64 ) in function: determine_new_packagename (packagepool) *** As I check in the install directory, I don't see US_inprogress folder, but I do see others. May I know how could I rectified this issue? Folder 'en-US_inprogress' is the folder name used during the creation of the installation packages. It is renamed to 'en-US' once the packaging has finished. Unfortunately, I can not help you with the error - I am not involved deep enough in the packaging. I recommendation is the remove folder 'unxlngx6.pro' (it is the build output folder) in module instsetoo_native and try a further 'build --all' Best regards, Oliver. The output of the console mention this: dmake: Error code 255, while making 'openoffice_en-US.deb' It seems to me that the build was failed due to the builder failed to make a deb package. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Proofing Tool GUI 2.3 released - 14.Feb.2014
On 14/02/2014 Marco A.G.Pinto wrote: Also, I want to implement the Hyphenation. Does anyone know how it works, so that I can implement it? Maybe there is documentation somewhere? The tool is called Hyphen and is part of Hunspell. So I think you should start from http://sourceforge.net/projects/hunspell/files/Hyphen/ The syntax of auxiliary files is very, very obscure! Most of the times the hyphenation patterns are not created, but they are converted from the ones available for TeX. The Italian package http://extensions.openoffice.org/project/dict-it should contain README files with links to the TeX sources. Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Proofing Tool GUI 2.3 released - 14.Feb.2014
Thanks, my dear friend Andrea! :-P :-P ;-) :-) On 14/02/2014 13:35, Andrea Pescetti wrote: On 14/02/2014 Marco A.G.Pinto wrote: Also, I want to implement the Hyphenation. Does anyone know how it works, so that I can implement it? Maybe there is documentation somewhere? The tool is called Hyphen and is part of Hunspell. So I think you should start from http://sourceforge.net/projects/hunspell/files/Hyphen/ The syntax of auxiliary files is very, very obscure! Most of the times the hyphenation patterns are not created, but they are converted from the ones available for TeX. The Italian package http://extensions.openoffice.org/project/dict-it should contain README files with links to the TeX sources. Regards, Andrea. --
review requested: [Bug 124188] CRASH when pasting grouped contents from Draw over a selected image : [Attachment 82591] Avoid NULL pointer access
Andre awf@googlemail.com has asked Oliver-Rainer Wittmann o...@apache.org for review: Bug 124188: CRASH when pasting grouped contents from Draw over a selected image https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124188 Attachment 82591: Avoid NULL pointer access https://issues.apache.org/ooo/attachment.cgi?id=82591action=edit - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Reporting a problem with the OpenOffice website - GENIO
Hi, I just thought you should be aware that I downloaded GENIO unintentionally when trying to download open office. It was disguised as a full screen pop up. Hopefully I can get rid of it, Charlotte - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Reporting a problem with the OpenOffice website - GENIO
Hello Charlotte, it seems that you did NOT download OpenOffice from the official homepage www.openoffice.org. Downloads from the original homepage which forward you to sourceforge never come with additional software. Would you mind telling which site you downloaded OpenOfficer from? Max Am 14.02.2014 14:55, schrieb Charlotte Forrer: Hi, I just thought you should be aware that I downloaded GENIO unintentionally when trying to download open office. It was disguised as a full screen pop up. Hopefully I can get rid of it, Charlotte - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Speech recognition with openoffice
I have used openoffice for some years Recently I have tried Speech Recognition with WRITER but it does not work Is it possible to remedy this? I have Windows 7 AW Dellipiani
RE: Reporting a problem with the OpenOffice website
Hi Marcus, Thanks for the reply. After trying it a couple more times I did a PAUSE and RESUME on the download and after the second time I did that it started the download. It may have just been some type of very slow connection problem or something because I could see a message showing a small amount of data downloaded each time I PAUSED and the data rate being around 13kB/sec. Just a note, when I was trying to download 4.0.1 a while back I did download 4.0.0 from SourceForge with no problem. Thanks again, Pete -Original Message- From: Marcus (OOo) [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2014 4:32 PM To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Cc: Pete Becher Subject: Re: Reporting a problem with the OpenOffice website Am 02/13/2014 06:04 PM, schrieb Pete Becher: Hi OOo Web Tech, I cannot download OOo 4.0.1 from http://www.openoffice.org/download/index.html** The Windows download window just keeps showing 0% forever as shown below. I tried a few weeks ago and had the same problem. I could not find anything in the Forum about this kind of problem. Any suggestions? Where I can look to find a solution? I'm sorry but I cannot see this or a similar problem. When clicking the download link I get a download progress until its end. If you are browsing via a proxy server (e.g., due to your ISP) maybe it's possible and helping to disable it or vis-versa to enable it. If you are browsing via your employer's Internet connection, maybe the Sysadmin(s) have blocked special ports or domains. A little talk with them could bring a solution, too. Or maybe the direct link to our hosting partner Sourceforge can help: Install file for English US: http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/4.0.1/binaries/en-US/Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.1_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe/download Or via a different mirror: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/openofficeorg.mirror/4.0.1/binaries/en-US/Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.1_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe?r=ts=1392330652use_mirror=skylink Hope this helps. Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Reporting a problem with the OpenOffice website
I have used openoffice for some years Recently I have tried Speech Recognition with WRITER but it does not work Is it possible to remedy this? AW Dellipiani
Re: Md5sum failed
Am 02/14/2014 04:14 PM, schrieb František Erben: Hi, on folowing download page https://www.vagrantup.com/downloads.html you can download SHA256 chechksums, not MD5SUM. MD5 and SHA256 is different checksum methods. Vagrant is not managed by Apache or OpenOffice. Please ask at Vagrantup for a solution. A starting point could be here: https://www.vagrantup.com/support.html Marcus 2014-02-14 13:40 GMT+01:00 Rob Weirrobw...@apache.org: On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 3:10 AM, Andre Fischerawf@gmail.com wrote: On 14.02.2014 03:16, njia1297-ubu...@yahoo.com wrote: Checksums do not match... thought someone should know. Can you provide more information? Which file did you check? Where did you download it from ? The original note included an image attachment that only moderators are able to see. It listed the files as: Vagrant-1.4.3.dmg Vagrant-1.4.3.msi Vagrant-1.4.3_i686.deb Vagrant-1.4.3_x86_64.deb So it looks like the note was misdirected. -Rob -Andre == William - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
[RELEASE][DISCUSS] How to download AOO 4.1.0 Beta?
As this is our first beta release at Apache, I would like to clarify some things before it's maybe too late to change the facts and to prepare webpages: 1. Target group It is intended to be downloaded for the general public, right? 2. Hosting We are planning to host the files at Sourceforge, right? 3. File names: Of course the file names of the install files have to show a difference compared to the general release files. Suggestion: Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.0_Beta_Win_x86_install.exe *If* there is a need to publish another round, it could be extended with a number like: Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.0_Beta2_Win_x86_install.exe 4. Directory structure: Is it OK to expect to use the same dir structure like we have currently for 4.0.1? 5. Download webpage: Is it OK to expect to offer the download on our main download webpage? http://www.openoffice.org/download/ If yes, I can build up a download offer like we have for the green box. To ease the download as best as possible. Thanks Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
RE: EXTERNAL: Re: OO 4.01 Compiled for Solaris 11 x86 Runtime Memory Fault
Andre, I think we are going to keep that section commented out for now. We are not sure what to do. Do you think commenting out that section will have a big impact at runtime? We are working on the Save now (described below). From: Andre Fischer [mailto:awf@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, February 07, 2014 2:18 AM To: Steele, Raymond; Andre Fischer; a...@openoffice.apache.org; Herbert Duerr (h...@apache.org); dev@openoffice.apache.org Cc: Meffe, David K Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: OO 4.01 Compiled for Solaris 11 x86 Runtime Memory Fault On 07.02.2014 00:04, Steele, Raymond wrote: Andre, When we commented out the section below, we were able to get the application to work correctly I would expect subtle errors in the sidebar, like panels not updating after context changes or when switching between application windows. (although it did not let us save a spreadsheet to disk for some reason. Each time we hit okay to save after supplying a unique name, the filechooser closes, but instantly reappears again. It did let us save it as another format, such as .dif). Strange, this change should not modify the saving of the document. That is probably an unrelated problem. However, the application crashes when we replace the lines with: ReferenceSidebarController xThis (this, SAL_NO_ACQUIRE); WeakReferenceSidebarController xWeakController (xThis); maSidebarControllerContainer.insert( SidebarControllerContainer::value_type( rxFrame, xWeakController)); I've attached the stack trace of that crash. It crashes right after the SidebarController destructor on line 177 (which is empty). Stepping from the destructor brings us into boost's checked_delete.hpp and eventually crashes at line 34 delete x. See attached stack trace. m_RefCount was 3 for us as well. Also strange. All this does not fit together. If the ref count is larger than 0 then the SidebarController should not be deleted. And if it where deleted, then not from Reference...::iquery. And boost::scoped_ptrWindow should have no problem deleting the control (I have not enough information to say which one it is). All controls are created in the initializer of the constructor and should be fully created and initialized by the time the crash is triggered. All this looks like the actual problem happens earlier, maybe some memory overwrite. Maybe you can use valgrind (or some other memory checker) to see if there is a memory problem? Thanks for taking the time to look into this, we are grateful. Would you happen to be located in the U.S.? No problem. I am a little worried that you have discovered a problem that lurks on all platforms and Solaris is the only one where it leads to an actual crash. And, no, I am not located in the US. I am in Germany. -Andre From: Andre Fischer [mailto:awf@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2014 2:03 AM To: Steele, Raymond; a...@openoffice.apache.orgmailto:a...@openoffice.apache.org; Herbert Duerr (h...@apache.orgmailto:h...@apache.org); dev@openoffice.apache.orgmailto:dev@openoffice.apache.org Cc: Meffe, David K; awf@gmail.commailto:awf@gmail.com Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: OO 4.01 Compiled for Solaris 11 x86 Runtime Memory Fault On 05.02.2014 20:02, Steele, Raymond wrote: Andre, We are not seeing any exception before the actual crash. Maybe I am not looking in the right place, but we've been using dbx intercept command to track any. Any other suggestions? Raymond, there a few thing you can do to find out if this is a local problem (broken in the constructor) or something more fundamental that is possibly caused by an error that happened much earlier. - Comment out the last few lines: /* WeakReferenceSidebarController xWeakController (this); maSidebarControllerContainer.insert( SidebarControllerContainer::value_type( rxFrame, xWeakController)); */ That should tell us whether the crash is caused just by storing the weak reference. The sidebar should still work in general but some updates may be lost. - Replace the last few lines by this: ReferenceSidebarController xThis (this, SAL_NO_ACQUIRE); WeakReferenceSidebarController xWeakController (xThis); maSidebarControllerContainer.insert( SidebarControllerContainer::value_type( rxFrame, xWeakController)); That removes one (of two) acquire calls (I don't know yet why there is a second acquire, after all the purpose of the weak reference is just /not/ to increase the reference count). - Check the value of the reference count of 'SidebarController* this' (in OWeakObject::acquire, cppuhelper/source/weak.cxx) when line 168 of the SidebarController constructor is executed. In my case it is 3. -Andre Also, I've attached the stack trace of the first and second notifyContextChangeEvent. They are different. That is OK. They should be different. But the stack trace of the
New committer: Clarence Guo (clarence_guo)
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache OpenOffice has asked Clarence Guo to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that he has accepted and taken the ID clarence_guo. A warm welcome to Clarence! Regards, Rob, on behalf of the Apache OpenOffice PMC - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [RELEASE][DISCUSS] How to download AOO 4.1.0 Beta?
Am 02/14/2014 10:31 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote: As this is our first beta release at Apache, I would like to clarify some things before it's maybe too late to change the facts and to prepare webpages: 1. Target group It is intended to be downloaded for the general public, right? yes, I think it needs to go a vote process as we've previously discussed. I'd need to look up the discussion on this. 2. Hosting We are planning to host the files at Sourceforge, right? 3. File names: Of course the file names of the install files have to show a difference compared to the general release files. Suggestion: Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.0_Beta_Win_x86_install.exe *If* there is a need to publish another round, it could be extended with a number like: Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.0_Beta2_Win_x86_install.exe Good point... 4. Directory structure: Is it OK to expect to use the same dir structure like we have currently for 4.0.1? 5. Download webpage: Is it OK to expect to offer the download on our main download webpage? http://www.openoffice.org/download/ If yes, I can build up a download offer like we have for the green box. To ease the download as best as possible. Maybe it would be better to have a separate beta page, or beta area on the download page like the former OOo site had for developer releases? Indeed I thought about to put it somewhere below the green box. Of course with different color and text. But a separate webpage is also OK. Let's see what the majority of us thinks. Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [RELEASE][DISCUSS] How to download AOO 4.1.0 Beta?
Am 02/14/2014 10:32 PM, schrieb Rob Weir: On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote: As this is our first beta release at Apache, I would like to clarify some things before it's maybe too late to change the facts and to prepare webpages: 1. Target group It is intended to be downloaded for the general public, right? 2. Hosting We are planning to host the files at Sourceforge, right? 3. File names: Of course the file names of the install files have to show a difference compared to the general release files. Suggestion: Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.0_Beta_Win_x86_install.exe *If* there is a need to publish another round, it could be extended with a number like: Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.0_Beta2_Win_x86_install.exe 4. Directory structure: Is it OK to expect to use the same dir structure like we have currently for 4.0.1? The above makes sense to me. 5. Download webpage: Is it OK to expect to offer the download on our main download webpage? http://www.openoffice.org/download/ If yes, I can build up a download offer like we have for the green box. To ease the download as best as possible. I would not make this the default download option for users. We still want most users to download AOO 4.0.1. So keep the first box on /download.html as it is now. Maybe a yellow box (yellow == caution) with language that makes it clear that this is beta and gives the URL for reporting bugs. I think I was not clear in my wording. :-) Of course the current 4.0.1 should not be effected in any way. With ease the download as best as possible I meant to do the same like we have for the green box but of course with a different color and text. Were you thinking of a language/platform switch logic for the beta? Or just a link to a beta_other.html page with a table of links? If we do the table, then we would have room on the same page to give a prominent warning, a link to BZ, Release Notes, etc. I thought about the one-click-download we have already. Then of course a beta-other.html is also needed and your suggestion makes absolutely sense. It could be a box somewhere below the green box. Or - as Kay mentioned - a separate webpage. Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Tajik spell check
Soliev Odil wrote: We already use Hanspell dictionary for spell cheking in Ms Office and OpenOfficeOrg which has 68686 roots and 3925 postfixes. We are interested include our research in latest distribution of openoffice system. Can we cooperate with you in this field? Sure! If you package your dictionary as a .oxt file you can upload it to the official OpenOffice Extensions repository at http://extensions.openoffice.org/ What should we do in cooperation? http://www.openoffice.org/lingucomponent/dictionary.html should cover all you need to package an extension. How get GNU GPL licence for our works? GPL is OK for dictionaries (while we require Apache License 2, the OpenOffice license, for other contributions, such as translations). See all details at the link above. If you want to help with the Tajik version of OpenOffice too, we do have a partial translation available (for internal reference: it is at http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/trunk/extras/l10n/source/tg/ ); please read https://openoffice.apache.org/translate.html and contact us on the l10n list in case. Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
OO 4.01 Compiled for Solaris 11 x86 Save As Stuck in a Loop
We are attempting to use the newly build OpenOffice 4.0.1 for Solaris 11 x86,
but the 'Save As' to disk of any document type (i.e. .ods) continuous to
prompt for a file name. Each time we hit okay to save the document after
supplying a unique name, the FilePicker closes, but instantly reappears again.
I have narrowed it down to the following code located in
sfx2/source/doc/guisaveas.cxx lines 1497-1520
The program gets stuck in the while loop below. The variable 'bExit' is never
set to sal_True, so the loop continuous. I provide a name to the FilePicker
interface, click Save and the loop continuous, redisplaying the dialog. To
resolve the issue, I added bExit = sal_True after line 1513 so that the loop
discontinuous. I am not sure if this will have effects in other situations,
maybe someone can provide some feedback, but for now. I am able to save.
sal_Bool bExit = sal_False;
1497 while ( !bExit )
1498 {
1499 bUseFilterOptions = aModelData.OutputFileDialog( nStoreMode,
aFilterProps, bSetStandardName, aSuggestedName, bPreselectPassword,
aSuggestedDir, nDialog, sStandardDir, aBlackList );
1500
1501 // in case the dialog is opend a second time the folder should be
the same as before, not what was handed over by parameters
1502 aSuggestedDir = ::rtl::OUString();
1503 if ( nStoreMode == SAVEAS_REQUESTED )
1504 {
1505 // in case of saving check filter for possible alien warning
1506 ::rtl::OUString aSelFilterName =
aModelData.GetMediaDescr().getUnpackedValueOrDefault(
1507 aFilterNameString,
1508 ::rtl::OUString() );
1509 sal_Int8 nStatusFilterSave = aModelData.CheckFilter( aSelFilterName
);
1510 if ( nStatusFilterSave == STATUS_SAVEAS_STANDARDNAME ) These are
equal during runtime
1511 {
1512 // switch to best filter
1513 bSetStandardName = sal_True; bSetStandardName is set to sal_True
here, but bExit is not, so the loop continuous. Setting bExit following this
line allows the program to save.
++bExit = salTrue;
1514 }
1515 else if ( nStatusFilterSave == STATUS_SAVE )
1516 {
1517 // user confirmed alien filter or good filter is used
1518 bExit = sal_True;
1519 }
1520 }
1521 else
1522 bExit = sal_True;
1523 }
Raymond Steele
U-2 Mission Planning
Software Engineer Sr
Lockheed Martin - ISGS Defense
1300 S. Litchfield Rd.
Goodyear, AZ 85338
Email: raymond.ste...@lmco.com
Business phone: 623-925-6402
Re: Speech recognition with openoffice
This has been addressed multiple times by the development community. https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=6104 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=70567 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=71542 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=84997 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=116253 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69039 As a cross platform program supporting Linux, OS X and Windows environments--the UNO Accessibility API will remain the basis of support for AT. In short this is not an Apache Open Office (or a LibreOffice) responsibility, it falls to 3rd party extension developers. And it remains for external projects to implement AT for mobility impaired users who would benefit from speech recognition. Microsoft TSF is in legacy status. And currently no agreed standard exists for Speach recognition. Microsoft has gone its own way with UI and MSSR. And Nuance, with its current Dragon NS 12--Full Text Control function--looks to again have omitted Apache OpenOffice and TDF LibreOffice support for UNO API, and only supporting Microsoft productivity products. The full implementation of a native IAccessible2 (v1.3) standard based bridge for Windows OS now provides the AT hooks needed to implement Windows speech recognition to both Apache OpenOffice and LibreOffice. That might be a Nuance DNS commercial module, or I'd lean more to an Extension for AOO/LibreOffice using the Python based Dragonfly speech recognition framework and a AOO/LibreOffice specific command-module for Microsoft WSR. Perhaps a cross over from the NVDA community. -- View this message in context: http://openoffice.2283327.n4.nabble.com/Speech-recognition-with-openoffice-tp4659010p4659028.html Sent from the Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [RELEASE][DISCUSS] How to download AOO 4.1.0 Beta?
Am 02/14/2014 10:47 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo): Am 02/14/2014 10:32 PM, schrieb Rob Weir: On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote: As this is our first beta release at Apache, I would like to clarify some things before it's maybe too late to change the facts and to prepare webpages: 1. Target group It is intended to be downloaded for the general public, right? 2. Hosting We are planning to host the files at Sourceforge, right? 3. File names: Of course the file names of the install files have to show a difference compared to the general release files. Suggestion: Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.0_Beta_Win_x86_install.exe *If* there is a need to publish another round, it could be extended with a number like: Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.0_Beta2_Win_x86_install.exe 4. Directory structure: Is it OK to expect to use the same dir structure like we have currently for 4.0.1? The above makes sense to me. 5. Download webpage: Is it OK to expect to offer the download on our main download webpage? http://www.openoffice.org/download/ If yes, I can build up a download offer like we have for the green box. To ease the download as best as possible. I would not make this the default download option for users. We still want most users to download AOO 4.0.1. So keep the first box on /download.html as it is now. Maybe a yellow box (yellow == caution) with language that makes it clear that this is beta and gives the URL for reporting bugs. I think I was not clear in my wording. :-) Of course the current 4.0.1 should not be effected in any way. With ease the download as best as possible I meant to do the same like we have for the green box but of course with a different color and text. Were you thinking of a language/platform switch logic for the beta? Or just a link to a beta_other.html page with a table of links? If we do the table, then we would have room on the same page to give a prominent warning, a link to BZ, Release Notes, etc. I thought about the one-click-download we have already. Then of course a beta-other.html is also needed and your suggestion makes absolutely sense. It could be a box somewhere below the green box. Or - as Kay mentioned - a separate webpage. I've added a quick version of how it could look like on the same download webpage: http://www.openoffice.org/download/test/index.html - The first yellow box is for the download when the Beta release is available. Of course the links are not yet working - but with link name and title you should get an first impression. - The second one is a little teaser to show when is it coming. With a link to the AOO blog - in case of if we want to blog about the upcoming Beta release. PS: The green box is still for the Mac OS X test: - download AOO 4.1.0 if 10.7 or newer is recognized in browser - download AOO 4.0.1 if 10.6 or older is recognized in browser Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
