Re: How to search for files to modify to fix a bug?
On 25.02.2014 20:21, Tenzin Chhosphel wrote: Hi all, I am just starting out to fix bugs. I spent some time around Bugzilla and now have a decent knowledge about how it works. And I understand finding the right files to fix is big part of fixing a bug. It seems there's no set of rules on how to find the files of interest. But, I bet there's some logical way to look for those files that needed to be modified to fix a bug. Any ideas/suggestions/advices on how to do that is much appreciated. It is hard to give a general answer to your question, but if you have a concrete problem/bug that you would like to work on, then maybe we can help you. -Andre Thanks, Tenzin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
[IMPORTANT] we are in showstopper mode for 4.1.0 [was: Re: [RELEASE]: new release branch AOO410 on trunk revision 1571426]
Hi, On 25.02.2014 14:05, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: Hi, On 25.02.2014 09:00, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: Hi, I create a new release branch for AOO410 based on trunk revision 1571426. Please use this branch for any AOO 4.1 relevant fixes. And make sure that the fix is merged to trunk as well (most developer fix it on trunk first and merge it on the branch). We start preparing a Beta RC on this new branch and will move in showstopper mode from now on. The same handling as before, nominate issues as showstopper by requesting the showstopper flag. When we are in 'showstopper mode' then the corresponding showstopper flag feature in our Bugzilla database must have been enabled. Can somebody with corresponding karma enable this feature? Thanks Herbert for activitating the feature. Important reminder: We are in showstopper mode now, please request showstopper flag for fixes you wanto to integrate into our 4.1.0 release branch. Best regards, Oliver. Thx in advance, Oliver. Juergen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [QA][Test Report] Weekly Status Update as of 20140224
Thanks Kay for your asking. This URL lists all resolved bugs(total#=193 as of Feb 24) https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=doremlist_id=126069namedcmd=AOO_Need_Verify_4.1remaction=runsharer_id=249289 From above query, we have identified 46 outstanding/critical bugs(as of Feb 24) which need to be verified before we release beta candidate(Feb 28), they includes all blockercriticalMajor bugs. ( search criteria of above URL is: Resolution: FIXED, DUPLICATE, IRREPRODUCIBLE, WONTFIX, MOVED Status: RESOLVED Target Milestone: 4.1.0, AOO 4.1 Changed: (is greater than or equal to) 20110701 Status: (changed to) RESOLVED Status: (changed after) 20110701 Issue Type: (is not equal to) Patch Issue Type: (is not equal to) Task Product: (is not equal to) qa ) On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 6:29 AM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 4:35 AM, Yuzhen Fan fanyuz...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, We continue doing the AOO 4.1 Function Verification test(FVT), here is the weekly update (2/15 - 2/24): *Test execution:* 1. Template validation - hold on, sent below issues and question to development Question: A new .odp is created with the template when try to open .otp file, is it intended? Issues: - only the first slide in template is available for apply to the existing presentation in AOO - It gets messed when apply template to an existing presentation 2. Existing feature on 3 APP testing - Ongoing We have assigned 853(817 as of 2/14) test executions to about 42(39 as of 2/14) volunteers, and completed about 45.8%(39.4% as of 2/14) in execution (535 test executions done, 461 as of 2/14). We get 3 more test execution volunteers since Feb 14 to speed up the test execution, we do not complete FVT as planned on Feb 24 TotalNot RunPassedFailedBlockedCompleted [%] Debian Linux 64bit5673610387.5 MacOS X209959020454.55 Redhat Linux 32bit69670202.90 Redhat Linux 64bit27712410941355.23 Ubuntu Linux 64bit167111479033.53 Windows 72091077722348.8 Windows 81821234415032.42 Total11696344031191345.8 *Defect summary:* 1. 46 resolved bugs are identified to verify before beta candidate release(Feb 28) (bug list is attached) *Issues quality highlight:* 1. We do not complete FVT on schedule. From above execution statistic, the coverage on Linux, Mac and Windows is with balance, the low execution rate on Linux 32bit is not critical as low priority on platform Linux 32bit 2. To release beta candidate safely, we need to verify proposed resolved bugs(total# = 46 so far) and check related function areas to see if any regression, will call for volunteers in community 3. We still need to run left test executions in FVT *Volunteer status: * 1. 3 new test execution volunteers(total 42 so far) joined on FVT execution work since Feb 14 2. Need defect volunteers to verify high priority bugs in Bugzilla (see above in Defect summary, any one can contribute on this, please let me know and provide the platforms you can help with) *Plan for next week:* 1. Verify identified high priority bugs 2. Continue to do FVT test on Mac, Linux and Windows Thanks you all for effort this week, although we do not complete FVT on schedule, we really have some test execution volunteers participating actively and make progress day and day. Let's continue and work together to make preparation for beta release candidate! -- Regards, Yu Zhen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org Is this still the correct URL for these outstanding/critical issues? https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=doremlist_id=128088namedcmd=AOO_Need_Verify_4.1remaction=runsharer_id=249289 it seems like it is from the issues you attached above ... -- - MzK Cats do not have to be shown how to have a good time, for they are unfailing ingenious in that respect. -- James Mason -- Regards, Yu Zhen
Re: How could I linked the dependencies of soffice.bin?
When I execute the soffice, I have this error: /home/kokhoe/workspace/aoo-trunk/main/solver/410/unxlngx6.pro/bin/javaldx: error while loading shared libraries: libjvmfwk.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory /home/kokhoe/workspace/aoo-trunk/main/solver/410/ unxlngx6.pro/bin/soffice.bin: error while loading shared libraries: libsofficeapp.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory When I did a search in my aoo source code for libjvmfwk.so, I manage to find it. But how could I linked libjvmfwk to javaldx? Should I execute soffice? Or soffice.bin? Which one should execute first?
4.1.0_release_blocker granted: [Bug 124311] adapt product meta information (version number, ...)
j...@apache.org has granted 4.1.0_release_blocker: Bug 124311: adapt product meta information (version number, ...) https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124311 --- Additional Comments from j...@apache.org For identifying a Beta in all relevant places we have to extend/change several paces and have to adapt the installer. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Does it make sense to raise a showstopper for MacOSX ?
Hi there, it seems that dispatching scripts via AOO's Java scripting framework is done using the wrong thread on MacOSX. This reasoning stems from observing the Java runtime error to be caused e.g. when using a JDialog to popup reporting the following error: com.sun.star.uno.RuntimeException[jni_uno_bridge_error] UNO calling Java method invoke: non-UNO exception occurred: java.lang.InternalError: Can't start the AWT because Java was started on the first thread. Make sure StartOnFirstThread is not specified in your application's info.plist or on the command line This problem is also present in Herbert's latest drop. This effectively inhibits dispatching any scripts from within AOO on MacOSX, which works fine on Windows and Linux otherwise (in 32- and the latter in addition in 64-bit). As the code for making ooRexx available was copied from the BeanShell's Java scripting framework implementation and works on all other platforms flawlessly, this seems to be a serious error on MacOSX, and therefore a showstopper, IMHO. [The code gets dispatched by AOO and on its supplied thread.] However and interestingly, there seems to be no problem with BeanShell and JavaScript, which is surprising to me. Not sure why they execute properly on MacOSX, but that observation is also the reason why I prefer to ask first, before setting the showstopper flag on bug 124170 (see below). There are two bug issues that document this problem: * Bug https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124170, Comment # 9: explains where to find the (basically a pure Java-) oxt (a debug version using JDialog) and how to get the Java error on MacOSX. * Bug https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120359 is probably related to the same reason (in the part describing problems dispatching scripts and some sort of work around that more or less worked on the prior 32-bit version). --- It might be interesting to note, that in OpenOffice.org times (32-bit OOo) it used to work on MacOSX. I am not aware of any changes in the scripting framework that could cause this behaviour. ---rony
Re: Draft OpenOffice Writer Usability Survey
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 5:11 PM, Donald Whytock dwhyt...@apache.org wrote: On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 4:51 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: I while ago we were contacted by some academic researchers in Spain who wanted to do a usability study about OpenOffice Writer. The wanted to interview Writer users, both new and experienced. You can read about the study here: https://sites.google.com/site/silviateresitaacunna/Home/usability-in-oss Since data privacy would not allow us to give them our mailing list to contact the users directly, we came up with the idea of using an opt-in survey to collect the names of those who would be interested. You can see the draft survey here: http://survey.openoffice.org/index.php/396365/lang/en/ It collects basic info about the users and their experience level, and then at the end asks if they agree to participate in the follow-up study. If they agree then we collect their email address. If you get a chance, please review the survey and let me know of any concerns. The phrasing on the year questions, Each answer must be between 0 and 100, seems a bit odd, as if one is expected to give more than one answer to the question. Here's the issue with that question: Our experience with the prior two questions is that we run into trouble when asking a how long have you been type question. We saw people entering the year they started doing the action. So they would enter 2010 if they started using OpenOffice in 2010 rather than 3 for three years. So the field validation is attempting to give an error if they make this mistake. It restricts the duration field to a number between 0 and 100. -Rob Other than that it looks fine to me. Don - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Draft OpenOffice Writer Usability Survey
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 5:36 PM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote: Rob Weir wrote: You can see the draft survey here: http://survey.openoffice.org/index.php/396365/lang/en/ I don't get the difference between being a University professor and being employed (or better: I don't see the reason to make separate categories for people who work at a University). This is not how I would do this either. But it is their study, so I'm inclined to let them do it that way if they want... More important: the last page should give some more information about the study, at least stating the topic (usability) in a more visible way. But linking to the study directly would be OK too. so people know what to expect. It links to the professor's website on introduction to the survey, but it makes sense to repeat the link at the end as well. I'll make that change. -Rob The rest is OK for me. Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: How could I linked the dependencies of soffice.bin?
Hi, On 26.02.2014 13:12, LOH KOK HOE wrote: When I execute the soffice, I have this error: /home/kokhoe/workspace/aoo-trunk/main/solver/410/unxlngx6.pro/bin/javaldx: error while loading shared libraries: libjvmfwk.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory /home/kokhoe/workspace/aoo-trunk/main/solver/410/ unxlngx6.pro/bin/soffice.bin: error while loading shared libraries: libsofficeapp.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory When I did a search in my aoo source code for libjvmfwk.so, I manage to find it. But how could I linked libjvmfwk to javaldx? Should I execute soffice? Or soffice.bin? Which one should execute first? The generated build output found in /main/solver/... can not be executed - as far as I know. The folder structure does not correspond to the one of an installed OpenOffice. Thus, the needed libraries are not found. After you had successfully performed a complete build you will find corresponding packages in the output folder of module instsetoo_native. Depending on configure option --with-package-format you will also found an 'installed' OpenOffice (--with-package-format=installed) or a archive containing an 'installed' OpenOffice which you only have to unpack (--with-package-format=archive). Note: --with-package-format=archive installed rpm deb is also possible resulting in debian-based packages, rpm-based packages, archive containing a 'installed' OpenOffice and and 'installed' OpenOffice. Best regards, Oliver. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Marketing - Apache logo
Hello Andrea, Am 18.02.2014 09:04, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: On 17/02/2014 Detlef Nannen wrote: this looks interesting. So far we finance a german Version of AOO-Flyers itself. What are the conditions for support, and how it can work? I'm answering both requests from you and Alexandro here. Thanks for the detailed explanation. For events we bought flyers and posters in the last months, and 2 transparents this week. Flyers and posters are designed in German language for German speaking countries. The flyers and posters and the transparents (banner.pdf) you'll find in a zip file at the following dropbox link. The posters are from 2012, still with the old logo. https://www.dropbox.com/s/d52f3et29nzy8du/forDEV.zip If we apply for a refund, do we use the DEV-List too, or a different way? Regards, Detlef - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Draft OpenOffice Writer Usability Survey
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 9:15 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 5:11 PM, Donald Whytock dwhyt...@apache.org wrote: On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 4:51 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: I while ago we were contacted by some academic researchers in Spain who wanted to do a usability study about OpenOffice Writer. The wanted to interview Writer users, both new and experienced. You can read about the study here: https://sites.google.com/site/silviateresitaacunna/Home/usability-in-oss Since data privacy would not allow us to give them our mailing list to contact the users directly, we came up with the idea of using an opt-in survey to collect the names of those who would be interested. You can see the draft survey here: http://survey.openoffice.org/index.php/396365/lang/en/ It collects basic info about the users and their experience level, and then at the end asks if they agree to participate in the follow-up study. If they agree then we collect their email address. If you get a chance, please review the survey and let me know of any concerns. The phrasing on the year questions, Each answer must be between 0 and 100, seems a bit odd, as if one is expected to give more than one answer to the question. Here's the issue with that question: Our experience with the prior two questions is that we run into trouble when asking a how long have you been type question. We saw people entering the year they started doing the action. So they would enter 2010 if they started using OpenOffice in 2010 rather than 3 for three years. So the field validation is attempting to give an error if they make this mistake. It restricts the duration field to a number between 0 and 100. Oh, I understand the intent. It was just the use of the word each that I wondered about, since Each answer must be between 0 and 100 appeared before multiple questions. So it was reading a bit to me that the restriction applied to each of the presumably potentially multiple answers to that question.
Re: So-called Reporting a problem with the OpenOffice website
On 02/09/2014 04:32 AM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: Am 02/09/2014 12:44 PM, schrieb Hagar Delest: Le 09/02/2014 11:42, Marcus (OOo) a écrit : I think we should guide them to the right one. The question is now: What is the best entry channel for website problems? ;-) I think that basic users will click on whatever looks like a way that will get them an answer. So the question is rather how to direct them to the best list and let the users wanting to report a problem with the site dig a bit more. I think that there are much more basic users needing a redirect to the user ML than real troubles with the site. I see we are on the same side. Marcus Well, as it had been a while since we last had any further discussion on this, I took the liberty of incorporating the changes we'd already discussed and agreed upon. The Contact us is a bit longer now, but hopefully it will be more clear to users what's the best thing to do. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- - MzK Cats do not have to be shown how to have a good time, for they are unfailing ingenious in that respect. -- James Mason - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Apache OpenOffice Writer Usability Survey
We invite you to take a brief survey on your use of Apache OpenOffice Writer. This survey is part of a larger usability study of OpenOffice usability by researchers at the Autonomous University of Madrid and the Polytechnic University of Madrid. You can read more about this research project Usability in Open Source Software Development on their website: https://sites.google.com/site/silviateresitaacunna/Home/usability-in-oss This brief survey will categorize users by experience level with OpenOffice Writer. As part of the usability study a subset of respondents will be contacted via email with further follow-up questions. If you consent to be part of this follow-up group please indicate so at the end of the survey. Here is the link to the survey: http://survey.openoffice.org/index.php/396365/lang-en Regards, -Rob - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Draft OpenOffice Writer Usability Survey
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: I while ago we were contacted by some academic researchers in Spain who wanted to do a usability study about OpenOffice Writer. The wanted to interview Writer users, both new and experienced. You can read about the study here: https://sites.google.com/site/silviateresitaacunna/Home/usability-in-oss Since data privacy would not allow us to give them our mailing list to contact the users directly, we came up with the idea of using an opt-in survey to collect the names of those who would be interested. You can see the draft survey here: http://survey.openoffice.org/index.php/396365/lang/en/ It collects basic info about the users and their experience level, and then at the end asks if they agree to participate in the follow-up study. If they agree then we collect their email address. If you get a chance, please review the survey and let me know of any concerns. Regards, -Rob - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org In the question Which of these applications do you know how to use? I'm not sure what the Other answer is intended to capture. I use several applications besides word processors, spreadsheets, databases and email. And leaving out a presentation application as an explicit option seems odd. Francis
