Re: [VOTE][DISCUSS] What should we do with the Why Compliance? page on the website
On 19/02/15 22:38, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Rob Weir wrote: Thread for discussion Come on, what's this? Do you guys read this list? We had this conversation earlier this month, not ages ago. It ended like this: http://markmail.org/message/2ae5vrtevxyizaje [Andrea] The page provides relevant information in a bad way. It is by keeping it as it is that we play the game of haters. I'll propose a rewrite next weekend. Now, weekends do not last 5 days, unfortunately, and life on the OpenOffice lists has been more eventful than I expected. But I very much prefer that instead of flooding the list as a handful of people did in the last few hours, someone would remember this and either say that we were still waiting for my rewrite or that they were replacing me in the task since I'm clearly late. But voting on the abstract option of replacing the page which something that doesn't exist does not really make a lot of sense to me. And it sounds too much like the usual we talk about something expecting that someone else does the work that I'd like we abandon. Well, my offer to rewrite it remains valid... but you'll have to be patient until next weekend! thanks Andrea that you still offer a rewrite for further discussion. I think this is the way to go. I still see valid points on this page and I believe it can help people to understand a bit more all this license jungle. At least the ones who are interested. And let us put a clear disclaimer on top of the page that is the view of the AOO PMC and not ASF in general. Juergen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [Vote] What should we do with the Why Compliance? page on the website
On 19/02/15 20:57, Rob Weir wrote: The page in question is here: http://www.openoffice.org/why/why_compliance.html Voting choices are: [ ] Leave the page as it is. [X] Make changes in that text parts where the facts are wrong or the tone does not fit or ASF rules were broken. [ ] Delete the entire page. Juergen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: website security certificate
On 20 February 2015 at 00:34, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote: Hi - We had a reason that we enabled https in the first place. I don't recall it now, but there was a reason. It may have had to do with update servers. The main web server on which we run, have always been enabled for both http: and https: but we have not been able to use it, due to a missing certificate. When we got the openoffice certificate, we had the possibility and at the same time we needed to change other services to https because the had a login facility. This lead to a decision, to do it but not officially support it. Someone (I think Markus or Rob) did a good job of removing http: on most tags, but some was to complicated to be removed automatically, hence we have some leftovers. Now with https: ranging high in google, we are effectively promoting that site, which is why I feel it should work or be removed (which I do not recommend). rgds jan i. Regards, Dave On Feb 19, 2015, at 2:49 PM, Marcus wrote: Am 02/19/2015 11:14 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: On 19/02/2015 Marcus wrote: OK, next try. Still an error message? Well... we NOWHERE, and I repeat NOWHERE, advertise the URL https://www.openoffice.org ; as a courtesy to those people who prefer HTTPS, we make it available, but if they use broken extensions or paranoid security settings they cannot blame us too much. then the solution would be to make it unavailable. ;-) Seriously, I agree with Jan. When it's available then it should work. Furthermore, there is also involvement of SEO: Google prefers the availability of HTTPS over HTTP. Then: 1) I also get (Firefox) the warning about This website does not supply identity information; I didn't investigate this one. 2) We still load components from HTTP. Marcus, the Net panel in Firebug will show you the URLs to all components. You will see that starting with a 404 (?) for http://www.openoffice.org/images/formElementDropShadow.png?2011060812 you have a series of action buttons that are all included via HTTP. This is because lines 56- of https://www.openoffice.org/home.css contain explicit HTTP links. You may fix it (but I would need to check the CSS syntax for the url() parameter) by: - Using /path/to links as Ariel suggested - Using // URLs (e.g., //www.openoffice.org will point to https://www.openoffice.org when called in a https page and to http://www.openoffice.org when called in a http page) ; I'm not a big fan of this solution, I would prefer the former one. All of this would anyway fix an undocumented, unpublished URL that we make available just to please people (remember, this is a static HTML site with no interactive server-side functionality or logins). I don't want to stress a new topic. :-P However, wasn't there a discussion to request a SSL certificate from Infra and the point was IMHO the difficulty to get this as a wildcard certificate? Anyway, I volunteer to do fixes where they a re needed (yes, I know we have a big wesite. ;-) ) Thanks for your valuable hints. Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [VOTE][DISCUSS] What should we do with the Why Compliance? page on the website
For what it's worth (and I'm sure there are some on this list who believe it is worth very little), I didn't and don't like the GPL-bashing verbiage, precisely because it is not consistent with ASF statements and leaves ASF open to the kind of criticism Bradley Kuhn has leveled. The page was originally written and discussed at a time when some factions of the PMC were not really entertaining dissent from an agenda of emphasizing the differences between AOO and LO/TDF, and I didn't feel it would help for me to suggest that AOO should concentrate on engineering and if anything practice generosity towards sister projects (which is closer to the Apache Way). But, since you've called for discussion and vote, I would vote -1 on leaving the page as-is, and +1 on changing it as JimJag (VP of Legal Affairs) has asked. Danese On Feb 20, 2015, at 1:28 AM, Rob Weir r...@robweir.com wrote: Thread for discussion - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Keith McKenna as CWiki admin
On 20 February 2015 at 08:46, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote: This one has been in queue for a long time, sorry Keith... As discussed on the doc list last month, new volunteers often ask for a MWiki account and a CWiki account at the same time. Keith already has privileges to create MWiki accounts, but not to create CWiki accounts. I propose that we give Keith the CWiki admin privileges too, so that we are more efficient in handling new account requests. I'll assume lazy consensus on this. +1 rgds jan i Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Updating the wiki theme.
On 20 February 2015 at 01:46, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote: +1 Nice idea and great attention to progressive staging. - Dennis -Original Message- From: acolor...@gmail.com [mailto:acolor...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Alexandro Colorado Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 14:41 To: dev Subject: Updating the wiki theme. I would like to update the wiki theme to the one that we use on the homepage. ATM the wiki theme uses the very old OpenOffice.org, we are going 4-5 years in Apache and still have the same look and feel. I would like to get a new theme on the wiki for current style. Did you find the sources you need, otherwise drop me an email, and I will copy it to you directly. First step should be to 'create' a theme that can be hacked and tested. Then change it to the default by the wiki admin. The old wiki would still be available and enabled by users that preffer the old one, but new theme could become the default once reaching a functional style. I am not soo keen to have multiple themes active on our production wiki, I spent quite some time removing all other themes than the AOO one. Having multiple themes gives 2 problems: - a security problem, if we are not very careful (I will not detail this) - a graphic layout problem, it turns out our setup is very sensitive to small changes like another font, and some of the pages tilt when you do that. You should also be aware that in order to keep our current theme running, I needed to patch some of the core code of mediawiki, it would be nice if a new them could avoid that. I suggest you make yourself a test instance of mediawiki (I can provide what you need of setup info, incl. a dump of the SQL), develop your theme, once you have it, make a couple of screenshot and get acceptance in here. Once it is accepted I am happy to take it, verify it, and install it on the production system. Sounds like a plan to you ? rgds jan i. Please comment. -- Alexandro Colorado Apache OpenOffice Contributor 882C 4389 3C27 E8DF 41B9 5C4C 1DB7 9D1C 7F4C 2614 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Updating the wiki theme.
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 4:48 AM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote: On 20 February 2015 at 01:46, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote: +1 Nice idea and great attention to progressive staging. - Dennis -Original Message- From: acolor...@gmail.com [mailto:acolor...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Alexandro Colorado Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 14:41 To: dev Subject: Updating the wiki theme. I would like to update the wiki theme to the one that we use on the homepage. ATM the wiki theme uses the very old OpenOffice.org, we are going 4-5 years in Apache and still have the same look and feel. I would like to get a new theme on the wiki for current style. Did you find the sources you need, otherwise drop me an email, and I will copy it to you directly. First step should be to 'create' a theme that can be hacked and tested. Then change it to the default by the wiki admin. The old wiki would still be available and enabled by users that preffer the old one, but new theme could become the default once reaching a functional style. I am not soo keen to have multiple themes active on our production wiki, I spent quite some time removing all other themes than the AOO one. Having multiple themes gives 2 problems: - a security problem, if we are not very careful (I will not detail this) - a graphic layout problem, it turns out our setup is very sensitive to small changes like another font, and some of the pages tilt when you do that. You should also be aware that in order to keep our current theme running, I needed to patch some of the core code of mediawiki, it would be nice if a new them could avoid that. I suggest you make yourself a test instance of mediawiki (I can provide what you need of setup info, incl. a dump of the SQL), develop your theme, once you have it, make a couple of screenshot and get acceptance in here. Once it is accepted I am happy to take it, verify it, and install it on the production system. Sounds like a plan to you ? Well that's an issue since like you specify this code is not 'generic' so I wont have details of what it needs to be applied to the production wiki. I would rather access a snapshot, or a duplicated VM temporarily until the work is done. However the development would be done in a closed fashion which is not the ideal scenario. Also would be nice if you could detailed the most obvious pitfalls to know how to get around it. The reason why you need to change code is mainly because Monowiki theme also suffered version changes, and our original theme was based of an older version of the monowiki theme. This scenario is kind of unaviodable, unless is started from scratch. rgds jan i. Please comment. -- Alexandro Colorado Apache OpenOffice Contributor 882C 4389 3C27 E8DF 41B9 5C4C 1DB7 9D1C 7F4C 2614 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- Alexandro Colorado Apache OpenOffice Contributor 882C 4389 3C27 E8DF 41B9 5C4C 1DB7 9D1C 7F4C 2614
RE: Reporting broken download link
It was actually windows 10 blocking the download. Original message From: Marcus marcus.m...@wtnet.de Date:02/20/2015 3:01 PM (GMT-06:00) To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Cc: Paul Merrill me...@fordav.com Subject: Re: Reporting broken download link Thanks for your hint. In the meantime it's working again. Marcus
Re: Reporting broken download link
Thanks for your hint. In the meantime it's working again. Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: List of service administrators (Re: Keith McKenna as CWiki admin)
Am 02/21/2015 12:12 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: Kay Schenk wrote: http://openoffice.apache.org/pmc-faqs.html Well we need to do a better job with this. Despite its lack of maintenance, this page is better than not having anything at all! Well, edits that I would suggest (and that I won't do; but I list them here for inspiration) are: - Remove the section I was invited/voted as committer, so whats next? since it's covered in the ASF-wide document we link to I haven't compared it with the ASF version. But if there is nothing new or special then, yes, remove it. - Section How to participate? is misleading in general, for sure item 4 is wrong. +1, seems an old part of our early days as podling. - MediaWiki: I am an application admin (not server admin) and I'm not listed. - Confluence: OOODEV is dead (I hoped; unfortunately it isn't, but it's unused and should be closed, it has nothing useful and we should not advertise it) - Bugzilla: Herbert is an admin and he is not listed - Blog: I am an author and I am not listed - Mailing lists: I would definitely advertise the -owner address only, since moderators can change often (but I have no idea if we can easily find out moderators' names... so maybe it's useful to list them in the end); Simon Phipps is surely missing from the users list moderators. The data is obviously out of date. But IMHO it is worth to get it up-to-date again. So, let's collect some more facts and update it. Example: Webmaster tasks Webpages can be edited by everyone who has the commit bit. So, it could be added as new list item with referring to the dev@ mailing list for the case of questions or simply for corrections. Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
List of service administrators (Re: Keith McKenna as CWiki admin)
Kay Schenk wrote: http://openoffice.apache.org/pmc-faqs.html Well we need to do a better job with this. Despite its lack of maintenance, this page is better than not having anything at all! Well, edits that I would suggest (and that I won't do; but I list them here for inspiration) are: - Remove the section I was invited/voted as committer, so whats next? since it's covered in the ASF-wide document we link to - Section How to participate? is misleading in general, for sure item 4 is wrong. - MediaWiki: I am an application admin (not server admin) and I'm not listed. - Confluence: OOODEV is dead (I hoped; unfortunately it isn't, but it's unused and should be closed, it has nothing useful and we should not advertise it) - Bugzilla: Herbert is an admin and he is not listed - Blog: I am an author and I am not listed - Mailing lists: I would definitely advertise the -owner address only, since moderators can change often (but I have no idea if we can easily find out moderators' names... so maybe it's useful to list them in the end); Simon Phipps is surely missing from the users list moderators. Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [VOTE][DISCUSS] What should we do with the Why Compliance? page on the website
I know we are waiting on Andrea's rewrite, but I would ask why bother to rewrite. Here are three reasons why the page should be removed from all language versions and not just hidden. (1) How does the PMC even know what this carefully nuanced page even says in another language like Chinese, Arabic, German, Russian, and the rest? (2) These pages cause a fracture in the overall OpenOffice / ODF ecosystem whether or not all of us acknowledge that fact. (3) These pages also damage the reputation of the ASF. The only way to handle our responsibilities as a PMC is to remove these pages in every language. Regards, Dave On Feb 20, 2015, at 12:37 AM, Danese Cooper wrote: For what it's worth (and I'm sure there are some on this list who believe it is worth very little), I didn't and don't like the GPL-bashing verbiage, precisely because it is not consistent with ASF statements and leaves ASF open to the kind of criticism Bradley Kuhn has leveled. The page was originally written and discussed at a time when some factions of the PMC were not really entertaining dissent from an agenda of emphasizing the differences between AOO and LO/TDF, and I didn't feel it would help for me to suggest that AOO should concentrate on engineering and if anything practice generosity towards sister projects (which is closer to the Apache Way). But, since you've called for discussion and vote, I would vote -1 on leaving the page as-is, and +1 on changing it as JimJag (VP of Legal Affairs) has asked. Danese On Feb 20, 2015, at 1:28 AM, Rob Weir r...@robweir.com wrote: Thread for discussion - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Reporting broken download link
Browser variables Values navigator.appCodeName Mozilla navigator.appName Netscape navigator.appVersion 5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; Trident/7.0; Touch; .NET4.0E; .NET4.0C; Tablet PC 2.0; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; rv:11.0) like Gecko navigator.platform Win32 navigator.oscpu undefined navigator.cpuClass x86 navigator.product Gecko navigator.productSub undefined navigator.vendor navigator.vendorSub undefined navigator.language en-US navigator.browserLanguage en-US navigator.userLanguage en-US navigator.systemLanguage en-US navigator.userAgent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; Trident/7.0; Touch; .NET4.0E; .NET4.0C; Tablet PC 2.0; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; rv:11.0) like Gecko Debian / Ubuntu / IceWeasel ? No / No / No Stable Release JavaScript functions/variables Values Language ISO code en-US Language ISO code (from select box) en-US Release matrix platform position (full) 11 Release matrix platform position (lp) 12 Release matrix platform array data y,134 Release matrix language array data en-US,English (US),English (US),y,download/index.html UI platform name Windows (EXE) UI platform name (not supported) Platform (short) win32 URL platform name (full) Win_x86_install URL platform name (lp) Win_x86_langpack URL platform name (from select box) win32 Version (from select box) 4.1.1 File name (full) Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.1_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe File name (lp) Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.1_Win_x86_langpack_en-US.exe File extension .exe File size (full) (MByte) 134 File size (lp) (MByte) 18 Release info Milestone AOO411m6 | Build ID 9775 | SVN r1617669 | Released 2014-08-21 Download file link (full) sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/4.1.1/binaries/en-US/Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.1_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe/download Download file link (lp) sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/4.1.1/binaries/en-US/Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.1_Win_x86_langpack_en-US.exe/download Checksum file link (full) (here for MD5) archive.apache.org/dist/openoffice/4.1.1/binaries/en-US/Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.1_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe.md5 Checksum file link (lp) (here for MD5) archive.apache.org/dist/openoffice/4.1.1/binaries/en-US/Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.1_Win_x86_langpack_en-US.exe.md5 Base URL to Sourceforge.net sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/4.1.1/binaries/ Base URL to Apache Archive archive.apache.org/dist/openoffice/4.1.1 getLinkSelection() (download URL) undefined isLanguageSupported() (true/false) ? true Show the sub-box (true/false) ? true General error (true/false) ? false
Re: [VOTE][DISCUSS] What should we do with the Why Compliance? page on the website
Am 02/20/2015 11:55 PM, schrieb Dave Fisher: I know we are waiting on Andrea's rewrite, but I would ask why bother to rewrite. Here are three reasons why the page should be removed from all language versions and not just hidden. (1) How does the PMC even know what this carefully nuanced page even says in another language like Chinese, Arabic, German, Russian, and the rest? that's also true for any other webpage that was localized. This is not special to the webpage we discuss. (2) These pages cause a fracture in the overall OpenOffice / ODF ecosystem whether or not all of us acknowledge that fact. Primarily I see www.openoffice.org as a portal for our software. It's not a general homepage for the community around everything that is based on OpenOffice or ODF. At least I cannot see pointers and text that mentioned other software and extensions *and* it would count as *majority* for the ecosystem. (3) These pages also damage the reputation of the ASF. Then remove/rewrite the parts. The only way to handle our responsibilities as a PMC is to remove these pages in every language. This is your opinion. However, the vote until now speaks a different language. Sorry, but removal is nothing more than the easy way out. When we cannot come to a new and agreed version of the text, then we can delete it completely. My 2 ct Marcus On Feb 20, 2015, at 12:37 AM, Danese Cooper wrote: For what it's worth (and I'm sure there are some on this list who believe it is worth very little), I didn't and don't like the GPL-bashing verbiage, precisely because it is not consistent with ASF statements and leaves ASF open to the kind of criticism Bradley Kuhn has leveled. The page was originally written and discussed at a time when some factions of the PMC were not really entertaining dissent from an agenda of emphasizing the differences between AOO and LO/TDF, and I didn't feel it would help for me to suggest that AOO should concentrate on engineering and if anything practice generosity towards sister projects (which is closer to the Apache Way). But, since you've called for discussion and vote, I would vote -1 on leaving the page as-is, and +1 on changing it as JimJag (VP of Legal Affairs) has asked. Danese On Feb 20, 2015, at 1:28 AM, Rob Weirr...@robweir.com wrote: Thread for discussion - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Possible broken link: from other.html
Am 02/20/2015 08:53 PM, schrieb Andrew.Myszkowski: Hopefully I can dump Libre Office now too; I went seeking a solution to Libre because its Sheets kept shutting down on pastes from other apps or when keying in = them arriving over to another cell to use as reference in a simple formula! Here's to a new life with Apache! I don't know how different the code is nowadays between LibreOffice and OpenOffice. So, it could be that it's working or maybe different. But in any case, give it a try. :-) Marcus On Feb 20, 2015, at 2:44 PM, Marcusmarcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote: Thanks for your hint. In the meantime it's working again. Am 02/20/2015 08:15 PM, schrieb Andrew Myszkowski: landing page is ERROR 0404 for the *button download full installation” link - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Keith McKenna as CWiki admin
Sounds good. Marcus Am 02/20/2015 08:46 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: This one has been in queue for a long time, sorry Keith... As discussed on the doc list last month, new volunteers often ask for a MWiki account and a CWiki account at the same time. Keith already has privileges to create MWiki accounts, but not to create CWiki accounts. I propose that we give Keith the CWiki admin privileges too, so that we are more efficient in handling new account requests. I'll assume lazy consensus on this. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Keith McKenna as CWiki admin
On 20 February 2015 at 17:13, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote: Assuming Keith has experience with Confluence Admin agreed. AFAIK CWiki Admin privileges extend to the whole of Confluence and are not limited to the project's CWikis. Infrastructure will need to be made aware of this request and grant the rights. Thanks for this information, that is new to me, but I do not doubt it. I change my +1 to depend on Keith has experience with Confluence, and Infra accept the request. rgds jan I. While I don't have the bandwidth to respond to account requests, I still have admin rights in case of an urgent need. Regards, Dave On Feb 19, 2015, at 11:46 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: This one has been in queue for a long time, sorry Keith... As discussed on the doc list last month, new volunteers often ask for a MWiki account and a CWiki account at the same time. Keith already has privileges to create MWiki accounts, but not to create CWiki accounts. I propose that we give Keith the CWiki admin privileges too, so that we are more efficient in handling new account requests. I'll assume lazy consensus on this. Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Updating the wiki theme.
I also like a common look feel. Thanks for suggesting and volunteering. Marcus Am 02/19/2015 11:41 PM, schrieb Alexandro Colorado: I would like to update the wiki theme to the one that we use on the homepage. ATM the wiki theme uses the very old OpenOffice.org, we are going 4-5 years in Apache and still have the same look and feel. I would like to get a new theme on the wiki for current style. First step should be to 'create' a theme that can be hacked and tested. Then change it to the default by the wiki admin. The old wiki would still be available and enabled by users that preffer the old one, but new theme could become the default once reaching a functional style. Please comment. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Updating the wiki theme.
On 20 February 2015 at 13:16, Alexandro Colorado j...@oooes.org wrote: On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 4:48 AM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote: On 20 February 2015 at 01:46, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote: +1 Nice idea and great attention to progressive staging. - Dennis -Original Message- From: acolor...@gmail.com [mailto:acolor...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Alexandro Colorado Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 14:41 To: dev Subject: Updating the wiki theme. I would like to update the wiki theme to the one that we use on the homepage. ATM the wiki theme uses the very old OpenOffice.org, we are going 4-5 years in Apache and still have the same look and feel. I would like to get a new theme on the wiki for current style. Did you find the sources you need, otherwise drop me an email, and I will copy it to you directly. First step should be to 'create' a theme that can be hacked and tested. Then change it to the default by the wiki admin. The old wiki would still be available and enabled by users that preffer the old one, but new theme could become the default once reaching a functional style. I am not soo keen to have multiple themes active on our production wiki, I spent quite some time removing all other themes than the AOO one. Having multiple themes gives 2 problems: - a security problem, if we are not very careful (I will not detail this) - a graphic layout problem, it turns out our setup is very sensitive to small changes like another font, and some of the pages tilt when you do that. You should also be aware that in order to keep our current theme running, I needed to patch some of the core code of mediawiki, it would be nice if a new them could avoid that. I suggest you make yourself a test instance of mediawiki (I can provide what you need of setup info, incl. a dump of the SQL), develop your theme, once you have it, make a couple of screenshot and get acceptance in here. Once it is accepted I am happy to take it, verify it, and install it on the production system. Sounds like a plan to you ? Well that's an issue since like you specify this code is not 'generic' so I wont have details of what it needs to be applied to the production wiki. Well you do need a test installation anyway, where you test your code. I would rather access a snapshot, or a duplicated VM temporarily until the work is done. However the development would be done in a closed fashion which is not the ideal scenario. Infra cannot provide a temporary VM just for this purpose, making that would include DNS, LDAP, Puppet so at least the work of a little day. I can (as I already suggested) provide you a SQL dump. I can also dump the application, allthough it will most likely not run on your vm, due to dependencies of a number of other programs. May I suggest, that you make a naked installation of mediawiki somewhere, build the theme, and let me put it on production. There are basically no need to have our pretty complex production environment just to make a new theme. Last time I worked with the theme, I did it exactly like that. Also would be nice if you could detailed the most obvious pitfalls to know how to get around it. The reason why you need to change code is mainly because Monowiki theme also suffered version changes, and our original theme was based of an older version of the monowiki theme. This scenario is kind of unaviodable, unless is started from scratch. You might be right about the version changes, but I am not convinced, since I had the same problems when I tried to update the theme code. I cannot detail the pitfalls for 2 good reasons: - I have forgotten most of what I did (it is in svn) and why I did it - Most of the things I simply did with try-test methods, I tried at that time not to understand too much of why the theme was so mega complex. I think we would benefit from a clean theme based on the newest version. rgds jan i. rgds jan i. Please comment. -- Alexandro Colorado Apache OpenOffice Contributor 882C 4389 3C27 E8DF 41B9 5C4C 1DB7 9D1C 7F4C 2614 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- Alexandro Colorado Apache OpenOffice Contributor 882C 4389 3C27 E8DF 41B9 5C4C 1DB7 9D1C 7F4C 2614
Re: Keith McKenna as CWiki admin
Assuming Keith has experience with Confluence Admin agreed. AFAIK CWiki Admin privileges extend to the whole of Confluence and are not limited to the project's CWikis. Infrastructure will need to be made aware of this request and grant the rights. While I don't have the bandwidth to respond to account requests, I still have admin rights in case of an urgent need. Regards, Dave On Feb 19, 2015, at 11:46 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: This one has been in queue for a long time, sorry Keith... As discussed on the doc list last month, new volunteers often ask for a MWiki account and a CWiki account at the same time. Keith already has privileges to create MWiki accounts, but not to create CWiki accounts. I propose that we give Keith the CWiki admin privileges too, so that we are more efficient in handling new account requests. I'll assume lazy consensus on this. Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Keith McKenna as CWiki admin
Dave Fisher wrote: AFAIK CWiki Admin privileges extend to the whole of Confluence No. Maybe the Admin Privileges I have in mind mean something else than the Admin Privileges you have in mind. My privileges are limited to adding (whitelisting) users to the OOOUSERS space and making some other administration (like changing logo) to that space. I have no permissions over other spaces. I can't even add users to groups, or see their e-mail address. Infrastructure will need to be made aware of this request and grant the rights. Sure. My so-called Admin privileges do not allow me to create a new space administrator for OOOUSERS, so it is automatic that Infra will need to allow this. I assume you Dave have more extended permissions, but the level of permissions I'm proposing we give to Keith is my set of permissions. This doesn't require a special CWiki experience other than the normal page editing that all of us have done on CWiki. I still have admin rights in case of an urgent need. OK, and I plan to keep my current privileges too. Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
RE: recent BZ changes -- some custom fields missing?
+1 nicely done, Kay and Herbert -Original Message- From: Herbert Duerr [mailto:h...@apache.org] Sent: Friday, February 20, 2015 04:23 To: d...@community.apache.org Cc: qa Subject: Re: recent BZ changes -- some custom fields missing? Hi Kay, We had an update to our BZ instance about a month ago. In all honesty, I didn't give the update a thorough review. Now, I see that our Release Blocker button, and Request Review button seem to be missing. Can someone else confirm this? or is it just my situation. Thanks. I can confirm that this was the case. The migration of these bits must have gone wrong: The release-blocker flags were still there, but none were activated, so I re-enabled the 4.1.2-blocker flag. The request-review flag was also still there but there were no groups left that were allowed to request or grant reviews of a patch attachment. I'm not sure what the original setting was, but I think every registered user could request the review and every member with can-confirm rights could grant the review. I reset these bits accordingly. Thanks for finding and reporting these problems! Herbert - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: qa-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
RE: Keith McKenna as CWiki admin
+1 and kudos to Keith (Side question: Is there some location where it is known who has the keys/karma to administration various services under AOO?) -Original Message- From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org] Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 23:47 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Keith McKenna as CWiki admin This one has been in queue for a long time, sorry Keith... As discussed on the doc list last month, new volunteers often ask for a MWiki account and a CWiki account at the same time. Keith already has privileges to create MWiki accounts, but not to create CWiki accounts. I propose that we give Keith the CWiki admin privileges too, so that we are more efficient in handling new account requests. I'll assume lazy consensus on this. Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: recent BZ changes -- some custom fields missing?
On 02/20/2015 09:12 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: +1 nicely done, Kay and Herbert -Original Message- From: Herbert Duerr [mailto:h...@apache.org] Sent: Friday, February 20, 2015 04:23 To: d...@community.apache.org Cc: qa Subject: Re: recent BZ changes -- some custom fields missing? Hi Kay, We had an update to our BZ instance about a month ago. In all honesty, I didn't give the update a thorough review. Now, I see that our Release Blocker button, and Request Review button seem to be missing. Can someone else confirm this? or is it just my situation. Thanks. I can confirm that this was the case. The migration of these bits must have gone wrong: The release-blocker flags were still there, but none were activated, so I re-enabled the 4.1.2-blocker flag. The request-review flag was also still there but there were no groups left that were allowed to request or grant reviews of a patch attachment. I'm not sure what the original setting was, but I think every registered user could request the review and every member with can-confirm rights could grant the review. I reset these bits accordingly. Thanks for finding and reporting these problems! Herbert Thanks. I just sent a reply email to Geoffrey of infra about this before seeing this reply. I will check on this soon. -- - MzK An old horse for a long, hard road, a young pony for a quick ride. -- Texas Bix Bender - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Keith McKenna as CWiki admin
On 20/02/2015 Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: Side question: Is there some location where it is known who has the keys/karma to administration various services under AOO? Short answer is no. We made attempts like http://openoffice.apache.org/pmc-faqs.html but they are too hard to maintain to be useful (actually, that page could/should be almost completely removed). Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Keith McKenna as CWiki admin
On 02/20/2015 09:49 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: On 20/02/2015 Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: Side question: Is there some location where it is known who has the keys/karma to administration various services under AOO? Short answer is no. We made attempts like http://openoffice.apache.org/pmc-faqs.html but they are too hard to maintain to be useful (actually, that page could/should be almost completely removed). Regards, Andrea. Well we need to do a better job with this. Despite its lack of maintenance, this page is better than not having anything at all! -- - MzK An old horse for a long, hard road, a young pony for a quick ride. -- Texas Bix Bender - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Keith McKenna as CWiki admin
On 20 February 2015 at 18:54, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote: On 02/20/2015 09:49 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: On 20/02/2015 Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: Side question: Is there some location where it is known who has the keys/karma to administration various services under AOO? Short answer is no. We made attempts like http://openoffice.apache.org/pmc-faqs.html but they are too hard to maintain to be useful (actually, that page could/should be almost completely removed). Regards, Andrea. Well we need to do a better job with this. Despite its lack of maintenance, this page is better than not having anything at all! +1 Sadly enough Infra does not have this information, so I cannot pull it out and hand it over. I can see we also totally miss forum and the vm maintainers. rgds jan I -- - MzK An old horse for a long, hard road, a young pony for a quick ride. -- Texas Bix Bender - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Keith McKenna as CWiki admin
Hi Andrea, Thanks. This works for sure. Let me know if my help is needed to grant him that karma. Regards, Dave On Feb 20, 2015, at 9:07 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Dave Fisher wrote: AFAIK CWiki Admin privileges extend to the whole of Confluence No. Maybe the Admin Privileges I have in mind mean something else than the Admin Privileges you have in mind. My privileges are limited to adding (whitelisting) users to the OOOUSERS space and making some other administration (like changing logo) to that space. I have no permissions over other spaces. I can't even add users to groups, or see their e-mail address. Infrastructure will need to be made aware of this request and grant the rights. Sure. My so-called Admin privileges do not allow me to create a new space administrator for OOOUSERS, so it is automatic that Infra will need to allow this. I assume you Dave have more extended permissions, but the level of permissions I'm proposing we give to Keith is my set of permissions. This doesn't require a special CWiki experience other than the normal page editing that all of us have done on CWiki. I still have admin rights in case of an urgent need. OK, and I plan to keep my current privileges too. Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: OpenOffice download error
Thanks for your hint. I've fixed the problem. So, it should work again. PS: Please be careful when downloading software from non-official sources. It can be packed with more than just the software you want to have. ;-) Marcus Am 02/20/2015 08:04 PM, schrieb Dannie Hilliard: This is the selection I have made, and I am finding the ERROR 404 screen when I hit the option to do a full installation. I am going to attempt to download from another source, but I wanted to report the ERROR404 problem because it is on your main website. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: website security certificate
I've started with the download webpage as I know it very well. I don't see any errors as it looks like before. But I'll leave it for the moment and go on earliest on Sunday. Marcus Am 02/19/2015 11:49 PM, schrieb Marcus: Am 02/19/2015 11:14 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: On 19/02/2015 Marcus wrote: OK, next try. Still an error message? Well... we NOWHERE, and I repeat NOWHERE, advertise the URL https://www.openoffice.org ; as a courtesy to those people who prefer HTTPS, we make it available, but if they use broken extensions or paranoid security settings they cannot blame us too much. then the solution would be to make it unavailable. ;-) Seriously, I agree with Jan. When it's available then it should work. Furthermore, there is also involvement of SEO: Google prefers the availability of HTTPS over HTTP. Then: 1) I also get (Firefox) the warning about This website does not supply identity information; I didn't investigate this one. 2) We still load components from HTTP. Marcus, the Net panel in Firebug will show you the URLs to all components. You will see that starting with a 404 (?) for http://www.openoffice.org/images/formElementDropShadow.png?2011060812 you have a series of action buttons that are all included via HTTP. This is because lines 56- of https://www.openoffice.org/home.css contain explicit HTTP links. You may fix it (but I would need to check the CSS syntax for the url() parameter) by: - Using /path/to links as Ariel suggested - Using // URLs (e.g., //www.openoffice.org will point to https://www.openoffice.org when called in a https page and to http://www.openoffice.org when called in a http page) ; I'm not a big fan of this solution, I would prefer the former one. All of this would anyway fix an undocumented, unpublished URL that we make available just to please people (remember, this is a static HTML site with no interactive server-side functionality or logins). I don't want to stress a new topic. :-P However, wasn't there a discussion to request a SSL certificate from Infra and the point was IMHO the difficulty to get this as a wildcard certificate? Anyway, I volunteer to do fixes where they a re needed (yes, I know we have a big wesite. ;-) ) Thanks for your valuable hints. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
OpenOffice download error
This is the selection I have made, and I am finding the ERROR 404 screen when I hit the option to do a full installation. I am going to attempt to download from another source, but I wanted to report the ERROR404 problem because it is on your main website. Download Apache OpenOffice (Hosted by Sourceforge.net - A trusted website)Select your favorite operating system, language and version:Windows (EXE)Linux 64-bit (x86-64) (DEB)Linux 64-bit (x86-64) (RPM)Linux 32-bit (x86) (DEB)Linux 32-bit (x86) (RPM)OS X 64-bit (x86-64) (DMG)OS X 32-bit (x86) (DMG)More platforms / operating systemsAsturianBasqueBulgarianCatalanCatalan [Valencia AVL]Catalan [Valencia RACV]Chinese [simplified]Chinese [traditional]CzechDanishDutchEnglish [British]English [US]FinnishFrenchGalicianGermanGreekHebrewHindiHungarianItalianJapaneseKhmerKoreanLithuanianNorwegian [Bokmal]PolishPortuguese [Brazilian]Portuguese [European]RussianScottish [Gaelic]Serbian [Cyrillic]SlovakSlovenianSpanishSwedishTamilThaiTurkishVietnamese4.1.14.1.04.0.14.0.03.4.1Older releases Download full installation Download language pack Release: Milestone AOO411m6 | Build ID 9775 | SVN r1617669 | Released 2014-08-21 | Release Notes Full installation: File size ~ 134 MByte | Signatures and hashes: KEYS , ASC , MD5 , SHA256 Language pack: File size ~ 18 MByte | Signatures and hashes: KEYS , ASC , MD5 , SHA256 What is a language pack?How to verify the download?Report broken link | Browser variables | Values | | navigator.appCodeName | Mozilla | | navigator.appName | Netscape | | navigator.appVersion | 5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/40.0.2214.111 Safari/537.36 | | navigator.platform | Win32 | | navigator.oscpu | undefined | | navigator.cpuClass | undefined | | navigator.product | Gecko | | navigator.productSub | 20030107 | | navigator.vendor | Google Inc. | | navigator.vendorSub | | | navigator.language | en-us | | navigator.browserLanguage | undefined | | navigator.userLanguage | undefined | | navigator.systemLanguage | undefined | | navigator.userAgent | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/40.0.2214.111 Safari/537.36 | | Debian / Ubuntu / IceWeasel ? | No / No / No | | Stable Release | | | JavaScript functions/variables | Values | | Language ISO code | en-US | | Language ISO code (from select box) | en-US | | Release matrix platform position (full) | 11 | | Release matrix platform position (lp) | 12 | | Release matrix platform array data | y,134 | | Release matrix language array data | en-US,English (US),English (US),y,download/index.html | | UI platform name | Windows (EXE) | | UI platform name (not supported) | | | Platform (short) | win32 | | URL platform name (full) | Win_x86_install | | URL platform name (lp) | Win_x86_langpack | | URL platform name (from select box) | win32 | | Version (from select box) | 4.1.1 | | File name (full) | Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.1_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe | | File name (lp) | Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.1_Win_x86_langpack_en-US.exe | | File extension | .exe | | File size (full) (MByte) | 134 | | File size (lp) (MByte) | 18 | | Release info | Milestone AOO411m6 | Build ID 9775 | SVN r1617669 | Released 2014-08-21 | | Download file link (full) | sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/4.1.1/binaries/en-US/Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.1_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe/download | | Download file link (lp) | sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/4.1.1/binaries/en-US/Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.1_Win_x86_langpack_en-US.exe/download | | Checksum file link (full) (here for MD5) | archive.apache.org/dist/openoffice/4.1.1/binaries/en-US/Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.1_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe.md5 | | Checksum file link (lp) (here for MD5) | archive.apache.org/dist/openoffice/4.1.1/binaries/en-US/Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.1_Win_x86_langpack_en-US.exe.md5 | | Base URL to Sourceforge.net | sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/4.1.1/binaries/ | | Base URL to Apache Archive | archive.apache.org/dist/openoffice/4.1.1 | | getLinkSelection() (download URL) | undefined | | isLanguageSupported() (true/false) ? | true | | Show the sub-box (true/false) ? | true | | General error (true/false) ? | false | Copyright License | Privacy | Website Feedback | Contact Us | Donate | ThanksApache, the Apache feather logo, and OpenOffice are trademarks of The Apache Software Foundation. OpenOffice.org and the seagull logo are registered trademarks of The Apache Software Foundation. Other names appearing on the site may be trademarks of their respective owners. » docs | | Error 404!No matches to your request were found.Possible causes for this - Incorrect URL. Check spelling and try again. - The link no longer exists or has moved. Please use the site search box to try to locate moved information. Additional information concerning popular moved documents - Security information (CVE documents and fixes) can now be
Re: website security certificate
Am 02/20/2015 08:07 PM, schrieb Marcus: I've started with the download webpage as I know it very well. I don't see any errors as it looks like before. But I'll leave it for the moment and go on earliest on Sunday. grrr, some change was too much. So, I've reverted the changes for now and will investigate later on the weekend. Marcus Am 02/19/2015 11:49 PM, schrieb Marcus: Am 02/19/2015 11:14 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: On 19/02/2015 Marcus wrote: OK, next try. Still an error message? Well... we NOWHERE, and I repeat NOWHERE, advertise the URL https://www.openoffice.org ; as a courtesy to those people who prefer HTTPS, we make it available, but if they use broken extensions or paranoid security settings they cannot blame us too much. then the solution would be to make it unavailable. ;-) Seriously, I agree with Jan. When it's available then it should work. Furthermore, there is also involvement of SEO: Google prefers the availability of HTTPS over HTTP. Then: 1) I also get (Firefox) the warning about This website does not supply identity information; I didn't investigate this one. 2) We still load components from HTTP. Marcus, the Net panel in Firebug will show you the URLs to all components. You will see that starting with a 404 (?) for http://www.openoffice.org/images/formElementDropShadow.png?2011060812 you have a series of action buttons that are all included via HTTP. This is because lines 56- of https://www.openoffice.org/home.css contain explicit HTTP links. You may fix it (but I would need to check the CSS syntax for the url() parameter) by: - Using /path/to links as Ariel suggested - Using // URLs (e.g., //www.openoffice.org will point to https://www.openoffice.org when called in a https page and to http://www.openoffice.org when called in a http page) ; I'm not a big fan of this solution, I would prefer the former one. All of this would anyway fix an undocumented, unpublished URL that we make available just to please people (remember, this is a static HTML site with no interactive server-side functionality or logins). I don't want to stress a new topic. :-P However, wasn't there a discussion to request a SSL certificate from Infra and the point was IMHO the difficulty to get this as a wildcard certificate? Anyway, I volunteer to do fixes where they a re needed (yes, I know we have a big wesite. ;-) ) Thanks for your valuable hints. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
RE: [Vote] What should we do with the Why Compliance? page on the website
-Original Message- From: Rob Weir [mailto:r...@robweir.com] Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 11:58 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: [Vote] What should we do with the Why Compliance? page on the website The page in question is here: http://www.openoffice.org/why/why_compliance.html Voting choices are: [ ] Leave the page as it is. [ ] Make changes in that text parts where the facts are wrong or the tone does not fit or ASF rules were broken. [X] Delete the entire page. The vote will last for 72-hours. All are welcome to vote. PMC votes are binding. Please put comments into the parallel [VOTE][DISCUSS] thread. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Possible broken link: from other.html
landing page is ERROR 0404 for the *button download full installation” link (copied link destination is: http://www.openoffice.org/download/sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/4.1.1/binaries/en-US/Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.1_MacOS_x86-64_install_en-US.dmg/download) *button page is URL: http://www.openoffice.org/download/index.html Im just trying to use your software for the first time, ouch! painful. ___ Andrew Myszkowski Rutgers Business School Marketing Entrepreneurship andrew.myszkow...@gmail.com (973) 771-8700 voice/text - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Reporting broken download link
Thanks for your hint. In the meantime it's working again. Marcus Am 02/20/2015 08:23 PM, schrieb Bliss Kok: I am using MS Windows 7 and FireFox for the browser. I am trying to download the Full Installation of OpenOffice - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Possible broken link: from other.html
Thanks for your hint. In the meantime it's working again. Marcus Am 02/20/2015 08:15 PM, schrieb Andrew Myszkowski: landing page is ERROR 0404 for the *button download full installation” link - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Reporting broken download link
I am using MS Windows 7 and FireFox for the browser. I am trying to download the Full Installation of OpenOffice *Browser variables**Values*navigator.appCodeName Mozillanavigator.appName Netscapenavigator.appVersion 5.0 (Windows)navigator.platform Win32navigator.oscpu Windows NT 6.1navigator.cpuClass undefinednavigator.product Geckonavigator.productSub 20100101navigator.vendor navigator.vendorSub navigator.language en-USnavigator.browserLanguage undefinednavigator.userLanguage undefinednavigator.systemLanguage undefinednavigator.userAgent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:35.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/35.0Debian / Ubuntu / IceWeasel ?No / No / No*Stable Release* *JavaScript functions/variables* *Values*Language ISO code en-USLanguage ISO code (from select box) en-USRelease matrix platform position (full) 11Release matrix platform position (lp) 12Release matrix platform array data y,134Release matrix language array data en-US,English (US),English (US),y,download/index.htmlUI platform name Windows (EXE)UI platform name (not supported) Platform (short) win32URL platform name (full) Win_x86_installURL platform name (lp) Win_x86_langpackURL platform name (from select box) win32Version (from select box) 4.1.1File name (full) Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.1_Win_x86_install_en-US.exeFile name (lp) Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.1_Win_x86_langpack_en-US.exeFile extension .exeFile size (full) (MByte) 134File size (lp) (MByte) 18Release info Milestone AOO411m6 | Build ID 9775 | SVN r1617669 | Released 2014-08-21Download file link (full) sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/4.1.1/binaries/en-US/Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.1_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe/downloadDownload file link (lp) sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/4.1.1/binaries/en-US/Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.1_Win_x86_langpack_en-US.exe/downloadChecksum file link (full) (here for MD5) archive.apache.org/dist/openoffice/4.1.1/binaries/en-US/Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.1_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe.md5Checksum file link (lp) (here for MD5) archive.apache.org/dist/openoffice/4.1.1/binaries/en-US/Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.1_Win_x86_langpack_en-US.exe.md5Base URL to Sourceforge.net sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/4.1.1/binaries/Base URL to Apache Archive archive.apache.org/dist/openoffice/4.1.1getLinkSelection() (download URL) undefinedisLanguageSupported() (true/false) ? trueShow the sub-box (true/false) ? trueGeneral error (true/false) ? false
Reporting broken download link
Link gives error 404! Using windows 7 OS Browser variables Values navigator.appCodeName Mozilla navigator.appName Netscape navigator.appVersion 5.0 (Windows NT 6.0) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/40.0.2214.115 Safari/537.36 navigator.platform Win32 navigator.oscpu undefined navigator.cpuClass undefined navigator.product Gecko navigator.productSub 20030107 navigator.vendor Google Inc. navigator.vendorSub navigator.language en-us navigator.browserLanguage undefined navigator.userLanguage undefined navigator.systemLanguage undefined navigator.userAgent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/40.0.2214.115 Safari/537.36 Debian / Ubuntu / IceWeasel ? No / No / No Stable Release JavaScript functions/variables Values Language ISO code en-US Language ISO code (from select box) en-US Release matrix platform position (full) 11 Release matrix platform position (lp) 12 Release matrix platform array data y,134 Release matrix language array data en-US,English (US),English (US),y,download/index.html UI platform name Windows (EXE) UI platform name (not supported) Platform (short) win32 URL platform name (full) Win_x86_install URL platform name (lp) Win_x86_langpack URL platform name (from select box) win32 Version (from select box) 4.1.1 File name (full) Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.1_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe File name (lp) Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.1_Win_x86_langpack_en-US.exe File extension .exe File size (full) (MByte) 134 File size (lp) (MByte) 18 Release info Milestone AOO411m6 | Build ID 9775 | SVN r1617669 | Released 2014-08-21 Download file link (full) sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/4.1.1/binaries/en-US/Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.1_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe/download Download file link (lp) sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/4.1.1/binaries/en-US/Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.1_Win_x86_langpack_en-US.exe/download Checksum file link (full) (here for MD5) archive.apache.org/dist/openoffice/4.1.1/binaries/en-US/Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.1_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe.md5 Checksum file link (lp) (here for MD5) archive.apache.org/dist/openoffice/4.1.1/binaries/en-US/Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.1_Win_x86_langpack_en-US.exe.md5 Base URL to Sourceforge.net sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/4.1.1/binaries/ Base URL to Apache Archive archive.apache.org/dist/openoffice/4.1.1 getLinkSelection() (download URL) undefined isLanguageSupported() (true/false) ? true Show the sub-box (true/false) ? true General error (true/false) ? false AP Duplock
Re: Reporting broken download link
Thanks for your hint. In the meantime it's working again. Marcus Am 02/20/2015 08:27 PM, schrieb preflight: I am attempting to download OpenOffice for a 64 bit Macintosh (OSX 10.9.5) and am getting a 404 error when I hit the download button. Can you help out? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Reporting broken download link
Thanks for your hint. In the meantime it's working again. Marcus Am 02/20/2015 08:34 PM, schrieb Adrian Duplock: Link gives error 404! Using windows 7 OS - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Possible broken link: from other.html
Wow, that was fast. andrew.myszkow...@gmail.com Rutgers Business School Marketing, Entrepreneurship 973-771-8700 voice/text On Feb 20, 2015, at 2:44 PM, Marcus marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote: Thanks for your hint. In the meantime it's working again. Marcus Am 02/20/2015 08:15 PM, schrieb Andrew Myszkowski: landing page is ERROR 0404 for the *button download full installation” link - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Possible broken link: from other.html
Thank you, hopefully now I can leave this zoho junk. andrew.myszkow...@gmail.com Rutgers Business School Marketing, Entrepreneurship 973-771-8700 voice/text On Feb 20, 2015, at 2:44 PM, Marcus marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote: Thanks for your hint. In the meantime it's working again. Marcus Am 02/20/2015 08:15 PM, schrieb Andrew Myszkowski: landing page is ERROR 0404 for the *button download full installation” link - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Possible broken link: from other.html
Hopefully I can dump Libre Office now too; I went seeking a solution to Libre because its Sheets kept shutting down on pastes from other apps or when keying in = them arriving over to another cell to use as reference in a simple formula! Here's to a new life with Apache! andrew.myszkow...@gmail.com Rutgers Business School Marketing, Entrepreneurship 973-771-8700 voice/text On Feb 20, 2015, at 2:44 PM, Marcus marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote: Thanks for your hint. In the meantime it's working again. Marcus Am 02/20/2015 08:15 PM, schrieb Andrew Myszkowski: landing page is ERROR 0404 for the *button download full installation” link - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Reporting broken download link
Marcus: Thanks -- that did the trick . . . Mark Neukom Preflight Department Wallace Carlson Printing 10825 Greenbrier Road Minnetonka, MN 55305 Direct: (952) 277-1229 Office: (952) 545-1645 Fax: (952) 546-8755 prefli...@wc-print.com On Feb 20, 2015, at 1:43 PM, Marcus wrote: Thanks for your hint. In the meantime it's working again. Marcus Am 02/20/2015 08:27 PM, schrieb preflight: I am attempting to download OpenOffice for a 64 bit Macintosh (OSX 10.9.5) and am getting a 404 error when I hit the download button. Can you help out? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
