Re: Review of BlackDuck OpenHub

[Dave Fisher]

Hi -

Sent from my iPhone

> On Mar 16, 2018, at 2:04 PM, toki  wrote:
> 
>> On 03/16/2018 07:36 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>> 
>> Sorry, I was not clear. 
> 
> I saw it as a request to look for trademark/copyright violations.
> (One of my other projects is trying to determine who the de juro and de
> facto copyright owner of about 100 books, written by the same person,
> is. Paraphrasing who we thought the copyright owner was: "My dad did not
> steal copyright ownership of that material. He did steal copyright
> ownership of this material." So naturally, my head is in
> trademark/copyright issues.)
> 
> FWIW, there were a couple of projects that, at first glance, would
> warrant investigation as trademark/copyright violations.

Please send those links to private@openoffice so that we can review without 
accusation and determine priority.

Thanks for looking.

Regards,
Dave

> 
> Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> 
>> had I not known this was a page about OpenOffice, I wouldn't have
> guessed this was OpenOffice.
> 
> I didn't realize that
> https://www.openhub.net/p?query=openoffice=users was a sub-page.
> Part of that is because I'm not familiar with OpenHub, and part of that
> was that it looked more like a list of what can interact with OOo, than
> a list of OOo components.
> 
> jonathon
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Review of BlackDuck OpenHub

[toki]

On 03/16/2018 07:36 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:

> Sorry, I was not clear. 

I saw it as a request to look for trademark/copyright violations.
(One of my other projects is trying to determine who the de juro and de
facto copyright owner of about 100 books, written by the same person,
is. Paraphrasing who we thought the copyright owner was: "My dad did not
steal copyright ownership of that material. He did steal copyright
ownership of this material." So naturally, my head is in
trademark/copyright issues.)

FWIW, there were a couple of projects that, at first glance, would
warrant investigation as trademark/copyright violations.

Andrea Pescetti wrote:

> had I not known this was a page about OpenOffice, I wouldn't have
guessed this was OpenOffice.

I didn't realize that
https://www.openhub.net/p?query=openoffice=users was a sub-page.
Part of that is because I'm not familiar with OpenHub, and part of that
was that it looked more like a list of what can interact with OOo, than
a list of OOo components.

jonathon

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: extension problem

[Pedro Lino]

> On March 16, 2018 at 8:12 PM Andrea Pescetti  wrote:
> 
> 
> Dave Brondsema wrote:
> > On 3/15/18 6:57 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> >> For example, https://t.co/sZTK7wwASJ and https://t.co/HV0HdhJLGR (listed 
> >> there)
> >> are still broken. And others from that list are broken too. But I guess 
> >> it's
> >> just a matter of moving them to the right place now.
> > 
> > The other extensions are fixed now too.
> 
> Thanks, it works for me now: I can download recent releases of other 
> extensions too.

But Comments on extensions are still broken and return

"Your comment is waiting for moderator approval.

Error message

Unable to send e-mail. Contact the site administrator if the problem persists."

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: extension problem

[Andrea Pescetti]

Dave Brondsema wrote:

On 3/15/18 6:57 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:

For example, https://t.co/sZTK7wwASJ and https://t.co/HV0HdhJLGR (listed there)
are still broken. And others from that list are broken too. But I guess it's
just a matter of moving them to the right place now.


The other extensions are fixed now too.


Thanks, it works for me now: I can download recent releases of other 
extensions too.


Regards,
  Andrea.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Task #d7d4b55f: Profile Tool Utility (Windows) Project: openoffice

[Matthias Seidel]

FWIW, he is referring to:

https://helpwanted.apache.org/task.html?d7d4b55f275b2025c2f04d94207b1a00d5e6f624

Regards,

   Matthias


Am 16.03.2018 um 11:32 schrieb bolanle egbedokun:
> Hi, Good day,
>
> Bolanle Egbedokun is my name from Nigeria,  A full-time Data
> Scientist/Analyst that utilizes machine learning and Business Intelligence
> skills for advance cutting-edge technologies, developing robust
> applications.
>
> I came across this project on Apache opensource website and I'm willing to
> contribute.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Regards.
>




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Labels

[Benjamin Wilbur]

I have OO 4.1.4 and just recently tried to use the Avery label menu.  Much
to my surprise

the label codes in OO are not in line with Avery's codes..  My wife has OO
3.0 which has label

codes which agree with Avery codes.  Why isn't my later version of OO up to
date with Avery's

label codes?   Thanks   Ben Wilbur

Re: Review of BlackDuck OpenHub

[Andrea Pescetti]

Dave Fisher wrote:

We have a record here: https://www.openhub.net/p?query=openoffice=users
Please have a look as I think we should make some changes.


The page https://www.openhub.net/p/openoffice is full of inaccuracies 
and shows that they are not even able to maintain data: they report our 
latest commit as 7 months ago and, in small, they write that their bots 
last checked 7 months ago. Can we simply ask to be delisted?


If we can't... well, it is so broken that, had I not known this was a 
page about OpenOffice, I wouldn't have guessed this was OpenOffice. So 
yes we should make "some" changes, and probably a lot of them!


Regards,
  Andrea.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Review of BlackDuck OpenHub

[Dave Fisher]

Hi -

Sorry, I was not clear. We should police our own project as it is listed as 
Java and not updated recently. Why is that?

Regards,
Dave

> On Mar 16, 2018, at 12:14 PM, toki  wrote:
> 
> On 03/16/2018 05:56 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
> 
>> We have a record here: https://www.openhub.net/p?query=openoffice=users 
>> 
> 
> There are, rounded off, 430 projects listed there.
> 
> Based upon looking at about a quarter of the pages, it looks like
> roughly:
> * 10% are specifically related to OOo l10n & i18n projects;
> * 20% are language specific libraries to utilize OOo documents;
> * 20% are extensions for OOo, AOo, EO, and LibO;
> * 50% are backoffice programs that can either import or edit OOo documents;
> * a third of the projects are obsolete/abandoned;
> 
>> Please have a look as I think we should make some changes.
> 
> * Are there any listings that you have specific concerns about;
> 
> * Break this up into smaller tasks.
> I can't look at all 430, but I could look at between half a dozen and a
> dozen - with very good odds that somebody else that can look at a dozen
> will pick the same dozen I pick.
> 
> jonathon
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

Review of BlackDuck OpenHub

[Dave Fisher]

Hi -

I’m currently doing a review of OpenOffice trademarks by repeating the Suitable 
Name Search.

We have a record here: https://www.openhub.net/p?query=openoffice=users 


Please have a look as I think we should make some changes.

Regards,
Dave


signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

Re: extension problem

[Dave Brondsema]

On 3/15/18 6:57 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Dave Brondsema wrote:
>> On 3/14/18 6:08 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>>> Currently, downloads of recent releases of the extensions (not only the 
>>> English
>>> dictionary, even if it is the most prominent) are broken. ...
>>> https://extensions.openoffice.org/en/project/english-dictionaries-apache-openoffice
>>>
>>
>> This dictionary download should work now.
> 
> Thanks, this one works now. In terms of users, the English dictionary was
> obviously the most important one to fix, but I still see issues with the most
> recent releases of other extensions. A convenient way to find them is the
> https://twitter.com/aooextensions Twitter feed.
> 
> For example, https://t.co/sZTK7wwASJ and https://t.co/HV0HdhJLGR (listed 
> there)
> are still broken. And others from that list are broken too. But I guess it's
> just a matter of moving them to the right place now.
> 

The other extensions are fixed now too.


Cheers,

-- 
Dave Brondsema : d...@brondsema.net
http://www.brondsema.net : personal
http://www.splike.com : programming
  <><

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: OS/2 drag writer only issue

[Yuri Dario]

Hi Damjan,

> Failing everything, trace through the code on the drop target and see where
> it's getting rejected and why.

I found that somehow the problem was related to mouse coordinates. 
This allowed me to understand that I was returning the wrong drop code
to OS/2: DOR_NODROPOP was preventing further DM_DRAGOVER messages to 
be sent to AOO message queue.

thanks,

Yuri



-- 
Bye,

Yuri Dario



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Task #d7d4b55f: Profile Tool Utility (Windows) Project: openoffice

[bolanle egbedokun]

Hi, Good day,

Bolanle Egbedokun is my name from Nigeria,  A full-time Data
Scientist/Analyst that utilizes machine learning and Business Intelligence
skills for advance cutting-edge technologies, developing robust
applications.

I came across this project on Apache opensource website and I'm willing to
contribute.







Regards.