Re: [VOTE] Recommend Marcus Lange (marcus) as the New Vice President for Apache OpenOffice
[ X ] +1 Approve (Binding) Gav... On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 1:35 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton <orc...@apache.org> wrote: > [BCC to PMC] > > RESOLUTION: That Marcus Lange (marcus) be recommended to the > Apache Software Foundation Board to serve as Vice President > for Apache OpenOffice. > > The Vice President for Apache OpenOffice serves in accordance with and > subject to the direction of the Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the > Foundation. The Vice President for Apache OpenOffice is the Chair of the > OpenOffice Project Management Committee. > > Please vote by reply to this dev@-list thread on approval of the > resolution. > > [ ] +1 Approve > [ ] 0 Abstain > [ ] -1 Disapprove, with explanation > > This is a procedural vote and a majority of binding votes is sufficient to > carry the resolution. > > Please do not do anything but [VOTE] (with any -1 explanations) on this > thread. > > To discuss this vote or the process, please use a [DISCUSS][VOTE] reply > rather than discussing on the [VOTE] thread. > > The [VOTE] will conclude no sooner than Monday, 2016-09-19T16:00Z. > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > >
Re: dmake
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 2:30 PM, Don Lewis <truck...@apache.org> wrote: > On 29 Aug, Gav wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 4:42 PM, Don Lewis <truck...@apache.org> wrote: > > > >> On 27 Aug, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > >> >> On 28 Aug, Gav wrote: > >> >>> when did you try that last Don? > >> >>> > >> >>> That url comes up oops 404 > >> >> > >> >> I last tried that in the last few weeks, but have been using a cached > >> >> copy since then. > >> >> > >> >> This page lists lots of mirrored copies: > >> >> <http://www.filewatcher.com/m/dmake-4.12.2.tar.bz2.461738-0.html> > >> >> > >> >> It looks like development has moved to GitHub: > >> >> <https://github.com/mohawk2/dmake/releases> > >> > > >> > and this is exactly what I was going to say ... > >> > > >> > With the demise of Google code the project moved to github and is > under > >> > a new maintainer (FreeBSD uses the new github version). > >> > > >> > Perhaps we should mirror dmake-4.12.2, which was the last version > >> > released on apache-extras, on sourceforge and update the build link. > >> > >> That seems like the easiest thing to do. I tried downloading from > >> GitHub and ran into a complication. The tarfile name downloaded from > >> github is DMAKE_4_12_2_2.tar.gz, but it unpacks into the directory > >> dmake-DMAKE_4_12_2_2 and bootstrap can't cope with that. I could fix > >> bootstrap, but that only helps trunk. Nothing could be done to fix > >> 4.1.2 other than re-rolling the tarball. > >> > >> At least for now, the new dmake download URL is: > >> <http://sourceforge.net/projects/oooextras.mirror/ > files/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2 > >> > > >> > > > > Thanks Don, that works fine. > > The Windows buildbot still needs the dmake fix. > Done - I replaced 7 occurrences of the old url with the new in the openoffice.org config. Gav... > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > > -- Gav...
Re: gstreamer
erm I spoke too soon, that doesn't work either. "checking whether to build the GStreamer media backend... checking for GSTREAMER... no configure: error: requirements to build the GStreamer media backend not met. Do not use --enable-gstreamer or install the missing packages " Gav... On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Gav <gmcdon...@apache.org> wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 2:56 AM, Kay Schenk <kay.sch...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 3:08 AM, Gav <gmcdon...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> I have a successful build on our Ubuntu 14.04 in prelim >>> tests before we migrate. That's the good news. >>> >>> As per subject; I could not get gstreamer to work so chose to >>> disable it to get on with the rest of the build. >>> >>> I could not find a suitable ubuntu package to install is the issue. >>> >>> Can someone enlighten me please so I can enable gstreamer >>> again. >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Gav... >>> >> >> Maybe here? >> >> http://packages.ubuntu.com/trusty/libgstreamer0.10-0 >> > > Great, that works fine, gstreamer enabled again. > > btw I've been using system Java 7 1.7.0_111 and works fine, but do we > want to keep using this? (I'd think so) > > Gav... > > >> >> I did see information that Ubuntu may already use gstreamer (libs?) in >> some form? >> I'm not sure what to tell you so something doesn't get overwritten. >> >> >> -- >> -- >> MzK >> >> "God helps those that help themselves." >> -- popular adage >> >> >
Re: gstreamer
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 2:56 AM, Kay Schenk <kay.sch...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 3:08 AM, Gav <gmcdon...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> I have a successful build on our Ubuntu 14.04 in prelim >> tests before we migrate. That's the good news. >> >> As per subject; I could not get gstreamer to work so chose to >> disable it to get on with the rest of the build. >> >> I could not find a suitable ubuntu package to install is the issue. >> >> Can someone enlighten me please so I can enable gstreamer >> again. >> >> Thanks >> >> Gav... >> > > Maybe here? > > http://packages.ubuntu.com/trusty/libgstreamer0.10-0 > Great, that works fine, gstreamer enabled again. btw I've been using system Java 7 1.7.0_111 and works fine, but do we want to keep using this? (I'd think so) Gav... > > I did see information that Ubuntu may already use gstreamer (libs?) in > some form? > I'm not sure what to tell you so something doesn't get overwritten. > > > -- > -- > MzK > > "God helps those that help themselves." > -- popular adage > >
gstreamer
Hi All, I have a successful build on our Ubuntu 14.04 in prelim tests before we migrate. That's the good news. As per subject; I could not get gstreamer to work so chose to disable it to get on with the rest of the build. I could not find a suitable ubuntu package to install is the issue. Can someone enlighten me please so I can enable gstreamer again. Thanks Gav...
Re: Fwd: Re: Questions about buildbot internals
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 4:10 AM, Kay Schenk <ksch...@apache.org> wrote: > > > On 08/28/2016 10:52 AM, Don Lewis wrote: > > On 28 Aug, Kay Schenk wrote: > >> > >> > >> On 08/27/2016 06:22 PM, Gav wrote: > >>> Hi. > >>> > >>> On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Don Lewis <truck...@apache.org> > wrote: > >>> > >>>> On 28 Aug, Gav wrote: > >>>>> On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Don Lewis <truck...@apache.org> > wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> On 28 Aug, Gav wrote: > >>>>>>> Hi Don, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 10:31 AM, Don Lewis <truck...@apache.org> > >>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On 28 Aug, Gav wrote: > >>>>>>>>> junit 4.11 is installed on the new buildbots we are prepping for > >>>> use > >>>>>> fwiw > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> We'll also need hamcrest version 1.3. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Ubuntu 14.04 LTS python-hamcrest is version 1.8 , is that too new? > >>>>>>> I'd like to try and stick to what the Ubuntu apt-get packages > provide, > >>>>>>> if not possible, alternate uris where we can get other versions > from. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> We don't want python-hamcrest. We just want the hamcrest1.3.jar > file. > >>>>>> I think this is it: > >>>>>> <http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/hamcrest/hamcrest- > >>>>>> all/1.3/hamcrest-all-1.3.jar> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> ok, in that case should we just not add it as a buildbot buildstep to > >>>>> download it during a build ? > >>>> > >>>> That was something that Damjan suggested as a possibility, but the > >>>> question was whether ext_sources was an appropriate place to stash it > as > >>>> it is a compiled artifact. > >>>> > >>>> Based on this old bug report: > >>>> <https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/junit/+bug/784631>, you > might > >>>> want to investigate whether the junit package actually include > hamcrest > >>>> as well. > >>>> > >>>> > >>> I expanded the install /usr/share/java/junit4.jar and saw no evidence > of > >>> hamcrest - and > >>> the bug you reference is still open, so not fixed I guess :/ > >>> > >>> I found where it is being actively developed (junit4 and junit5) on > GitHub. > >>> > >>> https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/blob/master/pom.xml > >>> > >>> Shows that it pulls in hamcrest as a dependency - does that mean it > makes > >>> it available > >>> for use ? I don't know. > >> > >> First of all, thank you for all this work, Gav! > >> > >> If you've got information on the complete pack for Junit4 (4.11), can > >> you see if ANY hamcrest jar is included? I personally just manually > >> downloaded hamcrest-core-1.3.jar, put into /usr/share/java and made a > >> sym link called just hamcrest.jar to it. > > > > I don't have a Ubuntu 14 VM handy, but I just got my Ubuntu 16 VM > > working again. Junit doesn't install hamcrest, and python-hamcrest > > doesn't either. The package that does install hamcrest-all.jar is > > libhamcrest-java. > > > > Thanks for checking on all this, Don, and you are absolutely correct! > Gav, it seems what we should install on the new 14.04 systems is this: > > http://packages.ubuntu.com/trusty/libhamcrest1.2-java Great, that works. > > This should work with the default junit 4.11. We do not want or need the > hamcrest-python. > > Unless something's changed significantly in the junit tests (and I have > not researched this), this should work for us. We used junit 4.11 for > testing on AOO 4.1.1. > ack, default junit4 on 14.04 LTS Ubuntu is 4.11 so all good there. Thanks. -- Gav...
Re: Fwd: Re: Questions about buildbot internals
On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Don Lewis <truck...@apache.org> wrote: > On 28 Aug, Gav wrote: > > Hi Don, > > > > On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 10:31 AM, Don Lewis <truck...@apache.org> wrote: > > > >> On 28 Aug, Gav wrote: > >> > junit 4.11 is installed on the new buildbots we are prepping for use > fwiw > >> > >> We'll also need hamcrest version 1.3. > >> > > > > Ubuntu 14.04 LTS python-hamcrest is version 1.8 , is that too new? > > I'd like to try and stick to what the Ubuntu apt-get packages provide, > > if not possible, alternate uris where we can get other versions from. > > We don't want python-hamcrest. We just want the hamcrest1.3.jar file. > I think this is it: > <http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/hamcrest/hamcrest- > all/1.3/hamcrest-all-1.3.jar> > > ok, in that case should we just not add it as a buildbot buildstep to download it during a build ? Thanks Gav...
Re: Fwd: Re: Questions about buildbot internals
Hi Don, On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 10:31 AM, Don Lewis <truck...@apache.org> wrote: > On 28 Aug, Gav wrote: > > junit 4.11 is installed on the new buildbots we are prepping for use fwiw > > We'll also need hamcrest version 1.3. > Ubuntu 14.04 LTS python-hamcrest is version 1.8 , is that too new? I'd like to try and stick to what the Ubuntu apt-get packages provide, if not possible, alternate uris where we can get other versions from. Thanks Gav... > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > > -- Gav...
Re: dmake
when did you try that last Don? That url comes up oops 404 Gav... On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 10:22 AM, Don Lewis <truck...@apache.org> wrote: > On 28 Aug, Gav wrote: > > Hi Guys, > > > > We have set up a new 14.04 LTS 64 bit VM and are in the process of > testing. > > > > Can you tell me what you intend to do with 'dmake' please - we cant build > > without it currently. Is there an alternative uri we get it from? > > The bootstrap script can build dmake and epm on the fly if these flags > are passed to configure: > > --with-dmake-url=http://dmake.apache-extras.org.codespot. > com/files/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2 > --with-epm-url=http://www.msweet.org/files/project2/epm- > 3.7-source.tar.gz > > I don't know if that is what we really want to do, but it does work. > >
Re: Fwd: Re: Questions about buildbot internals
junit 4.11 is installed on the new buildbots we are prepping for use fwiw Gav... On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 12:58 AM, Kay Schenk <ksch...@apache.org> wrote: > > > On 08/26/2016 04:22 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > > Kay Schenk wrote: > >> Do you really mean 16.04 LTS? Is there a buildbot setup with this? I > >> am NOT > >> a Ubuntu person. > > > > Yes, I did mean 16.04 LTS. But I see that end of life for 14.04 > > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases is April 2019, so 5 years and not 3 as > > it was for earlier Ubuntu LTS versions. This means 14.04 is OK. > > > > That said, if our focus is on making a release then we simply need > > working buildbots. The current setup (pending the dependency fixes) can > > be satisfactory too. As a rule of thumb, the newer a (Linux) buildbot > > is, the less compatible produced builds are - which means they can be > > tested by fewer people. > > > > Regards, > > Andrea. > > Just now I replaced configure.ac with and older version before the > specific junit and hamcrest version checking. Hopefully this will get > our current buildbots rolling again. > > The major problem with newer buildbots using Ubuntu is the glibc version > is newer compared to what is used in our "baseline" Linux, which is > CentOS5, or even, as I discovered CentOS7. SO, I can't test the builds > using my CentOS 6.8, for example. Newer end user Linux systems would > probably not have problems. > > The good thing about moving to the Ubuntu 14.04 buildbots was our > capability to install what we needed basically directly vs putting in > Jira tix to infra. > > I'm hoping the buildbots will run OK this evening. > > ps. I think Windows is building --without-junit, so we have an > inconsistency there. > > > > -- > > Kay Schenk > Apache OpenOffice > > "Things work out best for those who make > the best of the way things work out." > -- John Wooden > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > > -- Gav...
Open Office
I have installed Apache Open Office on my work computer. I am switching over from Microsoft Office, but I am having trouble figuring out which Open Office program to open my previous Microsoft Publisher documents in. It is a .pub file, and I'm not sure which file extension to select when it comes up. Any insight for me would be much appreciated. Thank you. Pete Gavrun ALL SIZE FENCING, llc Office: (269) 350-7820 Cell: (269) 650-0549 Fax: (248) 247-6162 Email: allsizefenc...@yahoo.com Web: www.allsizefencing.net
