Re: 4.1.2_release_blocker requested: [Issue 121492] Base can not filter by dates
Kay Schenk wrote: OK, I'm not sure this worked correctly or not in terms of supplying/preserving the meta information. If not, how to fix? It worked, see https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/branches/AOO410/main/dbaccess/?pathrev=1695343 and you will see that in the mergeinfo list you have the revision you actually merged. If it doesn't work (i.e., you commit only the files but not the directory), svn status will reported that the directory is changed (U status) and you can commit it separately, even though it is only a metadata commit. Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: 4.1.2_release_blocker requested: [Issue 121492] Base can not filter by dates
On 08/11/2015 01:51 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Kay Schenk wrote: OK, I'm not sure this worked correctly or not in terms of supplying/preserving the meta information. If not, how to fix? It worked, see https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/branches/AOO410/main/dbaccess/?pathrev=1695343 and you will see that in the mergeinfo list you have the revision you actually merged. OK, good. If it doesn't work (i.e., you commit only the files but not the directory), svn status will reported that the directory is changed (U status) and you can commit it separately, even though it is only a metadata commit. This is good to know. I did a commit from /main, not from the top of the branch really, but the svn diffs were the same either way, so I was hoping this would produce the same results. Regards, Andrea. -- MzK “The journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step.” --Lao Tzu - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: 4.1.2_release_blocker requested: [Issue 121492] Base can not filter by dates
On 10/08/2015 Kay Schenk wrote: OK, I have my merge ready to commit. But should I actually commit from main even if I only merged to one file? Thank you, and yes as I saw it the merge-tracking changes are considered by SVN to be changes in the directory (so in main, not in the files you committed), so committing only the file will still leave your copy not synchronized with the repository. Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: 4.1.2_release_blocker requested: [Issue 121492] Base can not filter by dates
On 08/11/2015 12:02 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: On 10/08/2015 Kay Schenk wrote: OK, I have my merge ready to commit. But should I actually commit from main even if I only merged to one file? Thank you, and yes as I saw it the merge-tracking changes are considered by SVN to be changes in the directory (so in main, not in the files you committed), so committing only the file will still leave your copy not synchronized with the repository. Regards, Andrea. Well I'm glad I asked. When I did a diff from either main or the from the directory in which the file resided, it was the same output so this is why I asked. OK, I will take care of this shortly. -- MzK “The journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step.” --Lao Tzu - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: 4.1.2_release_blocker requested: [Issue 121492] Base can not filter by dates
On 08/11/2015 09:21 AM, Kay Schenk wrote: On 08/11/2015 12:02 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: On 10/08/2015 Kay Schenk wrote: OK, I have my merge ready to commit. But should I actually commit from main even if I only merged to one file? Thank you, and yes as I saw it the merge-tracking changes are considered by SVN to be changes in the directory (so in main, not in the files you committed), so committing only the file will still leave your copy not synchronized with the repository. Regards, Andrea. Well I'm glad I asked. When I did a diff from either main or the from the directory in which the file resided, it was the same output so this is why I asked. OK, I will take care of this shortly. OK, I'm not sure this worked correctly or not in terms of supplying/preserving the meta information. If not, how to fix? -- MzK “The journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step.” --Lao Tzu - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: 4.1.2_release_blocker requested: [Issue 121492] Base can not filter by dates
On 08/10/2015 12:39 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: On 09/08/2015 Kay Schenk wrote: We had a Windows tester on this a few days after this post. I'm sure you've seen the comments in the BZ entry. I think this one is ready to go. Yes, there was a problem left (same set of comments) with the user who reported issues with a PostgreSQL backend but I would say this is unrelated and the investigation didn't seem to yield anything. So for the time being we can surely port the patch from trunk to the AOO410 branch. If you wish, you can do so too, preferably with SVN merge as discussed in https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126281#c11 (so SVN will track the merge automatically). Regards, Andrea. OK, I have my merge ready to commit. But should I actually commit from main even if I only merged to one file? -- MzK “The journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step.” --Lao Tzu - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: 4.1.2_release_blocker requested: [Issue 121492] Base can not filter by dates
On 09/08/2015 Kay Schenk wrote: We had a Windows tester on this a few days after this post. I'm sure you've seen the comments in the BZ entry. I think this one is ready to go. Yes, there was a problem left (same set of comments) with the user who reported issues with a PostgreSQL backend but I would say this is unrelated and the investigation didn't seem to yield anything. So for the time being we can surely port the patch from trunk to the AOO410 branch. If you wish, you can do so too, preferably with SVN merge as discussed in https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126281#c11 (so SVN will track the merge automatically). Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: 4.1.2_release_blocker requested: [Issue 121492] Base can not filter by dates
On 07/24/2015 02:53 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: On 18/07/2015 bugzilla wrote: Kay has asked for 4.1.2_release_blocker: Issue 121492: Base can not filter by dates https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=121492 This one looks good. Patch written by Hanya, discussed at length, and available since January 2014, included by Kay in trunk in September 2014, 14 votes. If we get some more testing (it's easily available on any dev version) it would be absolutely OK for me to include it in OpenOffice 4.1.2. Comment from https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=121492: For better evaluation for inclusion in 4.1.2, it would help a lot if someone tested this with https://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/install/win/ (recent Windows development builds; we have Linux builds available too, see link above for full list) and confirmed that everything works as expected. Thanks! Regards, Andrea. We had a Windows tester on this a few days after this post. I'm sure you've seen the comments in the BZ entry. I think this one is ready to go. -- MzK “The journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step.” --Lao Tzu - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
4.1.2_release_blocker requested: [Issue 121492] Base can not filter by dates
Kay ksch...@apache.org has asked for 4.1.2_release_blocker: Issue 121492: Base can not filter by dates https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=121492 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
