Re: state of Blockers on 4.2.0

2022-09-29 Thread Peter Kovacs 



Am 27.09.22 um 17:42 schrieb Marcus:

Am 27.09.22 um 16:11 schrieb Pedro Lino:

+1 in general

It would be better to separate the Bugzilla resolution from other 
comments. Both in the same column is misleading.
Agreed. This was just a first quick walkthrough. The information should 
also improved.


Marcus




+1

On 09/27/2022 3:03 PM WEST Matthias Seidel 
 wrote:


  +1

Am 27.09.22 um 08:21 schrieb Peter Kovacs:

I have added some information to the Overview List, to ease the
desicion what to do next.

I also did a quick Review on each issue, and tried to add the state to
the Resolution Column.

Maybe it would be good to add somewhere a rough description what we
need to do next for each issue?

For example:  "need testing on Linux, Windopws, MacOS"

or "Development (3/5) see comment 4"


What do you think?


Am 24.09.22 um 04:48 schrieb Peter Kovacs:

Hello all,

I was looking at our blockers for 4.2.0. I am confused atm. If I read
it right, then we have 3 Blockers for Windows and 2 for Mac 0 Linux,
right?

The other open Bugs are they resolved? - For example 126762
 seems to be fixed
for 4.2., but state is still open.


I think a bit of clarity would help. I try to look at the MacOsX
build next.


All the best

Peter



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: state of Blockers on 4.2.0

2022-09-27 Thread Marcus 

Am 27.09.22 um 16:11 schrieb Pedro Lino:

+1 in general

It would be better to separate the Bugzilla resolution from other 
comments. Both in the same column is misleading.


Marcus




+1


On 09/27/2022 3:03 PM WEST Matthias Seidel  wrote:

  
+1


Am 27.09.22 um 08:21 schrieb Peter Kovacs:

I have added some information to the Overview List, to ease the
desicion what to do next.

I also did a quick Review on each issue, and tried to add the state to
the Resolution Column.

Maybe it would be good to add somewhere a rough description what we
need to do next for each issue?

For example:  "need testing on Linux, Windopws, MacOS"

or "Development (3/5) see comment 4"


What do you think?


Am 24.09.22 um 04:48 schrieb Peter Kovacs:

Hello all,

I was looking at our blockers for 4.2.0. I am confused atm. If I read
it right, then we have 3 Blockers for Windows and 2 for Mac 0 Linux,
right?

The other open Bugs are they resolved? - For example 126762
 seems to be fixed
for 4.2., but state is still open.


I think a bit of clarity would help. I try to look at the MacOsX
build next.


All the best

Peter



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: state of Blockers on 4.2.0

2022-09-27 Thread Pedro Lino 
+1

> On 09/27/2022 3:03 PM WEST Matthias Seidel  wrote:
> 
>  
> +1
> 
> Am 27.09.22 um 08:21 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
> > I have added some information to the Overview List, to ease the
> > desicion what to do next.
> >
> > I also did a quick Review on each issue, and tried to add the state to
> > the Resolution Column.
> >
> > Maybe it would be good to add somewhere a rough description what we
> > need to do next for each issue?
> >
> > For example:  "need testing on Linux, Windopws, MacOS"
> >
> > or "Development (3/5) see comment 4"
> >
> >
> > What do you think?
> >
> >
> > Am 24.09.22 um 04:48 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
> >> Hello all,
> >>
> >> I was looking at our blockers for 4.2.0. I am confused atm. If I read
> >> it right, then we have 3 Blockers for Windows and 2 for Mac 0 Linux,
> >> right?
> >>
> >> The other open Bugs are they resolved? - For example 126762
> >>  seems to be fixed
> >> for 4.2., but state is still open.
> >>
> >>
> >> I think a bit of clarity would help. I try to look at the MacOsX
> >> build next.
> >>
> >>
> >> All the best
> >>
> >> Peter
> >>
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: state of Blockers on 4.2.0

2022-09-27 Thread Matthias Seidel 
+1

Am 27.09.22 um 08:21 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
> I have added some information to the Overview List, to ease the
> desicion what to do next.
>
> I also did a quick Review on each issue, and tried to add the state to
> the Resolution Column.
>
> Maybe it would be good to add somewhere a rough description what we
> need to do next for each issue?
>
> For example:  "need testing on Linux, Windopws, MacOS"
>
> or "Development (3/5) see comment 4"
>
>
> What do you think?
>
>
> Am 24.09.22 um 04:48 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I was looking at our blockers for 4.2.0. I am confused atm. If I read
>> it right, then we have 3 Blockers for Windows and 2 for Mac 0 Linux,
>> right?
>>
>> The other open Bugs are they resolved? - For example 126762
>>  seems to be fixed
>> for 4.2., but state is still open.
>>
>>
>> I think a bit of clarity would help. I try to look at the MacOsX
>> build next.
>>
>>
>> All the best
>>
>> Peter
>>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: state of Blockers on 4.2.0

2022-09-27 Thread Peter Kovacs 
I have added some information to the Overview List, to ease the desicion 
what to do next.


I also did a quick Review on each issue, and tried to add the state to 
the Resolution Column.


Maybe it would be good to add somewhere a rough description what we need 
to do next for each issue?


For example:  "need testing on Linux, Windopws, MacOS"

or "Development (3/5) see comment 4"


What do you think?


Am 24.09.22 um 04:48 schrieb Peter Kovacs:

Hello all,

I was looking at our blockers for 4.2.0. I am confused atm. If I read 
it right, then we have 3 Blockers for Windows and 2 for Mac 0 Linux, 
right?


The other open Bugs are they resolved? - For example 126762 
 seems to be fixed 
for 4.2., but state is still open.



I think a bit of clarity would help. I try to look at the MacOsX build 
next.



All the best

Peter



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: state of Blockers on 4.2.0

2022-09-26 Thread Peter Kovacs 



Am 26.09.22 um 18:25 schrieb Marcus:

Am 24.09.22 um 04:48 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
I was looking at our blockers for 4.2.0. I am confused atm. If I read 
it right, then we have 3 Blockers for Windows and 2 for Mac 0 Linux, 
right?


The other open Bugs are they resolved? - For example 126762 
 seems to be fixed 
for 4.2., but state is still open.


I think a bit of clarity would help. I try to look at the MacOsX 
build next.


we have a list of all 4.2.0 blocker:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Blocker+issues+4.2.0

I don't know if the data is up-to-date - especially the status - 
however it gives you a better overview than the simple listing in 
Bugzilla.


Yes this is the same List I look at, too. And my Question is about the 
status.


If you look at the blockers flag it differs from Bugzilla. Plus some 
Bugs seem to be resolved, but are marked still as open. We should check 
state.





Marcus


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: state of Blockers on 4.2.0

2022-09-26 Thread Rony G. Flatscher (Apache) 

On 26.09.2022 18:25, Marcus wrote:

Am 24.09.22 um 04:48 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
I was looking at our blockers for 4.2.0. I am confused atm. If I read it right, then we have 3 
Blockers for Windows and 2 for Mac 0 Linux, right?


The other open Bugs are they resolved? - For example 126762 
 seems to be fixed for 4.2., but state is still 
open.


I think a bit of clarity would help. I try to look at the MacOsX build next.


we have a list of all 4.2.0 blocker:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Blocker+issues+4.2.0

I don't know if the data is up-to-date - especially the status - however it gives you a better 
overview than the simple listing in Bugzilla.


AFAIK, issue  has been addressed and fixed by Jim, 
if not mistaken.


---rony



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: state of Blockers on 4.2.0

2022-09-26 Thread Marcus 

Am 24.09.22 um 04:48 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
I was looking at our blockers for 4.2.0. I am confused atm. If I read it 
right, then we have 3 Blockers for Windows and 2 for Mac 0 Linux, right?


The other open Bugs are they resolved? - For example 126762 
 seems to be fixed for 
4.2., but state is still open.


I think a bit of clarity would help. I try to look at the MacOsX build 
next.


we have a list of all 4.2.0 blocker:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Blocker+issues+4.2.0

I don't know if the data is up-to-date - especially the status - however 
it gives you a better overview than the simple listing in Bugzilla.


Marcus


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: state of Blockers on 4.2.0

2022-09-24 Thread Matthias Seidel 
Hi Peter,

Am 24.09.22 um 14:22 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
>
> Am 24.09.22 um 09:37 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>> Hi Peter,
>>
>> Am 24.09.22 um 04:48 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
>>> Hello all,
>>>
>>> I was looking at our blockers for 4.2.0. I am confused atm. If I read
>>> it right, then we have 3 Blockers for Windows and 2 for Mac 0 Linux,
>>> right?
>>>
>>> The other open Bugs are they resolved? - For example 126762
>>>  seems to be fixed
>>> for 4.2., but state is still open.
>> The state of the issue is "Accepted", far away from fixed...
>>
>> I am not sure if further testing was done and if the last patch did make
>> it into code.
>
> The patch has been merged to trunk. There is a request for testing, yes.
I misinterpreted the last comment, which is clearly SPAM.
>
> So maybe we could test it and get it marked as fixed?

That would be great! And maybe we should backport it to AOO41X, since
this problem occurs really often.

Regards,

   Matthias

>
>>
>>>
>>> I think a bit of clarity would help. I try to look at the MacOsX build
>>> next.
>> Yes, macOS really needs some attention.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>     Matthias
>>
>>>
>>> All the best
>>>
>>> Peter
>>>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: state of Blockers on 4.2.0

2022-09-24 Thread Peter Kovacs 



Am 24.09.22 um 09:37 schrieb Matthias Seidel:

Hi Peter,

Am 24.09.22 um 04:48 schrieb Peter Kovacs:

Hello all,

I was looking at our blockers for 4.2.0. I am confused atm. If I read
it right, then we have 3 Blockers for Windows and 2 for Mac 0 Linux,
right?

The other open Bugs are they resolved? - For example 126762
 seems to be fixed
for 4.2., but state is still open.

The state of the issue is "Accepted", far away from fixed...

I am not sure if further testing was done and if the last patch did make
it into code.


The patch has been merged to trunk. There is a request for testing, yes.

So maybe we could test it and get it marked as fixed?





I think a bit of clarity would help. I try to look at the MacOsX build
next.

Yes, macOS really needs some attention.

Regards,

    Matthias



All the best

Peter



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: state of Blockers on 4.2.0

2022-09-24 Thread Matthias Seidel 
Hi Peter,

Am 24.09.22 um 04:48 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
> Hello all,
>
> I was looking at our blockers for 4.2.0. I am confused atm. If I read
> it right, then we have 3 Blockers for Windows and 2 for Mac 0 Linux,
> right?
>
> The other open Bugs are they resolved? - For example 126762
>  seems to be fixed
> for 4.2., but state is still open.

The state of the issue is "Accepted", far away from fixed...

I am not sure if further testing was done and if the last patch did make
it into code.

>
>
> I think a bit of clarity would help. I try to look at the MacOsX build
> next.

Yes, macOS really needs some attention.

Regards,

   Matthias

>
>
> All the best
>
> Peter
>



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

state of Blockers on 4.2.0

2022-09-23 Thread Peter Kovacs 

Hello all,

I was looking at our blockers for 4.2.0. I am confused atm. If I read it 
right, then we have 3 Blockers for Windows and 2 for Mac 0 Linux, right?


The other open Bugs are they resolved? - For example 126762 
 seems to be fixed for 
4.2., but state is still open.



I think a bit of clarity would help. I try to look at the MacOsX build next.


All the best

Peter