Re: [dev] Re: instsetoo_native: Assembly missing for Windows install
On 05.01.2011 01:00, Kristján Bjarni Guðmundsson wrote: - - - - - - - - - Áframsendur póstur - - - - - - - - - - From: Mathias Bauernospamfor...@gmx.de To: dev@openoffice.org Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2011 09:00:10 +0100 Subject: Re: [dev] Re: instsetoo_native: Assembly missing for Windows install On 13.12.2010 17:07, Mathias Bauer wrote: Hi Kristján, On 12.12.2010 11:41, Kristján Bjarni Guðmundsson wrote: I already reported this as a bug for the build: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=114372 But it got rejected as invalid. I have reopened this issue. If my workaround helps, I can provide a fix soon, otherwise I have to test a little bit. Regards, Mathias Did it help? Regards, Mathias Yes setting variable WITH_VC_REDIST and including the exe in the solver bin worked correctly. Thanks for your help. Regards, Kristján Thanks for the confirmation; now I can provide a fix for the problem. Regards, Mathias -- Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer OpenOffice.org Engineering at Oracle: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS Please don't reply to nospamfor...@gmx.de. I use it for the OOo lists and only rarely read other mails sent to it. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] Re: instsetoo_native: Assembly missing for Windows install
On 13.12.2010 17:07, Mathias Bauer wrote: Hi Kristján, On 12.12.2010 11:41, Kristján Bjarni Guðmundsson wrote: I already reported this as a bug for the build: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=114372 But it got rejected as invalid. I have reopened this issue. If my workaround helps, I can provide a fix soon, otherwise I have to test a little bit. Regards, Mathias Did it help? Regards, Mathias -- Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer OpenOffice.org Engineering at Oracle: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS Please don't reply to nospamfor...@gmx.de. I use it for the OOo lists and only rarely read other mails sent to it. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] Re: instsetoo_native: Assembly missing for Windows install
- - - - - - - - - Áframsendur póstur - - - - - - - - - - From: Mathias Bauer nospamfor...@gmx.de To: dev@openoffice.org Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2011 09:00:10 +0100 Subject: Re: [dev] Re: instsetoo_native: Assembly missing for Windows install On 13.12.2010 17:07, Mathias Bauer wrote: Hi Kristján, On 12.12.2010 11:41, Kristján Bjarni Guðmundsson wrote: I already reported this as a bug for the build: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=114372 But it got rejected as invalid. I have reopened this issue. If my workaround helps, I can provide a fix soon, otherwise I have to test a little bit. Regards, Mathias Did it help? Regards, Mathias Yes setting variable WITH_VC_REDIST and including the exe in the solver bin worked correctly. Thanks for your help. Regards, Kristján
Re: [dev] Re: instsetoo_native: Assembly missing for Windows install
Hi Kristján, On 12.12.2010 11:41, Kristján Bjarni Guðmundsson wrote: I already reported this as a bug for the build: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=114372 But it got rejected as invalid. I have reopened this issue. If my workaround helps, I can provide a fix soon, otherwise I have to test a little bit. Regards, Mathias -- Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer OpenOffice.org Engineering at Oracle: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS Please don't reply to nospamfor...@gmx.de. I use it for the OOo lists and only rarely read other mails sent to it. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] Re: instsetoo_native: Assembly missing for Windows install
On 05.12.2010 20:58, Kristján Bjarni Guðmundsson wrote: So does this mean that Windows XP support has been dropped from the build environment? How am I then supposed to build installations for Windows XP? Is it possible to get the source to your build environment, so that I can build Windows XP installations? Or at least get some information on what changes I have to make to build with vcredist_x86.exe? No, Windows support hasn't been dropped - at least not intentionally. It seems that whoever changed the build environment so that the redists are no longer required, meant it well: it made it easier for developers to build OOo as they don't need to download the redists and put them into the source tree manually again and again. Instead of that, they install them once and for good. But unfortunately he forgot to add a configure switch that allows to include the redistributables. So I consider this a bug. I will see that we can fix it as soon as possible. In the meantime you could try a hack: put your redistributable into solver/bin set the environment variable WITH_VC_REDIST to TRUE and see if it works. Regards, Mathias -- Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer OpenOffice.org Engineering at Oracle: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS Please don't reply to nospamfor...@gmx.de. I use it for the OOo lists and only rarely read other mails sent to it. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
[dev] Re: instsetoo_native: Assembly missing for Windows install
- - - - - - - - - Áframsendur póstur - - - - - - - - - - From: Mathias Bauer nospamfor...@gmx.de To: dev@openoffice.org Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 18:16:25 +0100 Subject: Re: [dev] instsetoo_native: Assembly missing for Windows install On 01.12.2010 13:58, Kristján Bjarni Guðmundsson wrote: I am building DEV300_m94 on Windows with this configure: ./configure --with-lang=is --with-vendor=OpenOffice.is --with-build-version=Build by OpenOffice.is --disable-activex --disable-directx --disable-atl --disable-build-mozilla --disable-nss-module --without-junit --with-cl-home=/cygdrive/C/Program Files/Microsoft Visual Studio 9.0/VC --with-ant-home=/cygdrive/c/winapps/java/ant --with-frame-home=/cygdrive/C/Program Files/Microsoft SDKs/Windows/v6.1 --with-psdk-home=/cygdrive/C/Program Files/MicrosoftSDKs/Windows/v6.1 --with-midl-path=/cygdrive/C/Program Files/Microsoft SDKs/Windows/v6.1/Bin --with-asm-home=/cygdrive/C/Program Files/Microsoft Visual Studio 9.0/VC/Bin --with-jdk-home=/cygdrive/C/Winapps/java/jdk16 --with-csc-path=/cygdrive/C/WINDOWS/Microsoft.NET/Framework/v3.5 Looks fine. It seems to me the the problem is that the generated install doesn't contain the redistributable vcredist_x86.exe file. This seems to have been changed in some release of the source code, since previous builds before worked. If you install the vcredist_x86.exe then OpenOffice.org can be started. The normal install from OpenOffice.org does however contain the vcredist_x86.exe file, so this must be a difference in how the builds are created. Why is this? Somewhere on the way to OOo3.2 we changed the way how the vcredist is packed. I'm not sure if it was the intent that there is no configure switch to allow packing with vcredist. The only reasons that come to my mind could be legal issues. Perhaps Martin (on CC) knows that better. Regards, Mathias -- Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer OpenOffice.org Engineering at Oracle: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS Please don't reply to nospamfor...@gmx.de. I use it for the OOo lists and only rarely read other mails sent to it. So does this mean that Windows XP support has been dropped from the build environment? How am I then supposed to build installations for Windows XP? Is it possible to get the source to your build environment, so that I can build Windows XP installations? Or at least get some information on what changes I have to make to build with vcredist_x86.exe?
