Re: [VOTE] Release Shale Master POM Version 3
I would like to cancel this vote and go ahead and implement the changes outlined by Rahul that will keep the site from redeploying when the master-pom is released. You can track progress in SHALE-487: https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/SHALE-487 Any objections? Greg On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 11:29 AM, Greg Reddin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 10:59 AM, Greg Reddin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please vote +1 if you reviewed the new master pom and approve of it -1 if you found a flaw or potential problem with the new master pom I'll add my +1 as well. Just a note: I'm leaving town tomorrow morning and won't be available to do more work on this until probably Wednesday. If y'all are anxious to get things out there someone can go ahead and complete the process for the master POM, but if you do please update the wiki page I created [1] so future RM's can have an exact list of what needs to be done to publish a release. Otherwise I'll get back on it sometime Wednesday or so. Thanks, Greg [1] http://wiki.apache.org/shale/ReleasePlan105
Master pom changes (was: Release Shale Master POM Version 3)
On 4/18/08, Greg Reddin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would like to cancel this vote and go ahead and implement the changes outlined by Rahul that will keep the site from redeploying when the master-pom is released. You can track progress in SHALE-487: https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/SHALE-487 Any objections? snip/ None, thanks for doing this. If the master pom v3 hasn't been sync'ed to central, I don't mind doing a take 2 on it (otherwise we can move on to v4). I've locked down some other commonly used plugins. There are some TODOs, I'll comment on SHALE-487 where we're tracking this. -Rahul
Re: Master pom changes (was: Release Shale Master POM Version 3)
On 4/18/08, Greg Reddin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 3:19 PM, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: None, thanks for doing this. If the master pom v3 hasn't been sync'ed to central, I don't mind doing a take 2 on it (otherwise we can move on to v4). I was hoping to just redo it. It has not been sync'ed yet so I'll just svn rm the tag and the artifacts on the staging repo and to it over. snip/ Sure. -Rahul