This looks good to me.

Greg

On Jul 17, 2006, at 12:57 AM, Craig McClanahan wrote:

As part of our transition to an Apache top level project (TLP), we are
obligated to submit a report to the ASF Board every month for the first three months, then quarterly thereafter. Here's what I am proposing to send for July, which needs to be forwarded in a couple days. (I'll also create a "pmc" subdirectory in the repository to archive these things, since there is
nothing non-public we need to worry about).  Comments?

====================================================================== =====

Apache Shale Board Report for July 2006
=======================================


Overview
--------

Per the Apache Board resolution at the June 2006 meeting, Apache Shale was created as a top level project. This is the first of the "every month for
the
first three months" status reports to the Board on activities within the
project.

All of the initial root and infrastructure requests have been completed. We

are still de-tangling a few loose ends (wiki and JIRA instance shared with
the
Struts project), but these are not considered to be urgent.


PMC and Committer Changes
-------------------------

None.


Current Development Activities
------------------------------

As the creation of Shale as a TLP was coming to fruition, we had nearly completed a migration to a Maven2 based build environment. This work has been substantially completed, and Shale is now completely M2 based for its
build infrastructure.  Nightly builds are still currently hosted on my
(Craig's) home desktop, but steps are underway to migrate this to a
Continuum
instance on Apache infrastructure.

We have initiated a contest to pick an official logo for the Apache Shale project -- details are at <http://wiki.apache.org/shale/LogoContest >. The
entries so far have ranged from humorous to compelling ... it will be
interesting
to pick a final winner.

Current release activities are focused on a 1.0.3 release, which is still
likely
to be considered "beta" quality (due to dependence on unreleased components,

plus some outstanding bugs), but which has been requested by some downstream
users to avoid their need to depend on snapshots.


Submitted by,
Craig McClanahan

Reply via email to