On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 11:57 PM, Stefan Teleman <stefan.tele...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Liviu Nicoara <nikko...@hates.ms> wrote: >> >> I tried, unsuccessfully, to reproduce the failure observed by Martin in >> 22.locale.moneypunct.mt, in both debug and optimized, wide and narrow builds >> on a 16x machine: >> > > I can reproduce it consistently on Solaris without the patches. It has > a very high failure rate. It's also been reported at least once > before, here: > > http://old.nabble.com/22.locale.numpunct.mt-run-hangs-td20133013.html > > I remember there were more hits about 22.locale.numpunct.mt in Google > when I searched for it a while ago, but I didn't look as closely now. > > I'll create a Solaris build without my patches tomorrow and send the output.
FWIW, my today's builds without the patches with the Intel compiler: COMPILER: Intel C++, __INTEL_COMPILER = 1210, __INTEL_COMPILER_BUILD_DATE = 20111011, __EDG_VERSION__ = 403 22.locale.numpunct.mt ran for 3 hours (wall clock time) without ever completing or doing anything except flatlining the cpu at 115%, on both 32-bit and 64-bit. This is on: [steleman@darthvader][/src/steleman/programming/stdcxx-intel/stdcxx-4.2.1-thread-safe/build/tests][09/04/2012 0:21:13][1181]>> uname -a Linux darthvader.stefanteleman.org 3.5.0-2.fc17.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Jul 30 14:48:59 UTC 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux I can't (yet) rebuild with GCC 4.7.0 because Fedora 17's build of GCC C++ is a mess (libsupc++.a requires TLS but glibc was built with TLS disabled). --Stefan -- Stefan Teleman KDE e.V. stefan.tele...@gmail.com
