[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: ablack
Date: Tue Apr 1 08:36:22 2008
New Revision: 643448
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=643448view=rev
Log:
2008-04-01 Andrew Black [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* etc/config/windows/run_locale_utils.wsf (run_locale_utils):
Replication of r643435 for Windows. (Update result footer format to
match format expected by exec utility. Footer search logic changed
in r643120.)
Does this by any chance fix the recent failures in locale tests?
E.g., In these builds:
http://people.apache.org/~sebor/stdcxx/results/hpux-11.11-pa-acc-3.73-11S-643226-log.gz.txt
http://people.apache.org/~sebor/stdcxx/results/linux_redhat_el-3.8-em64t-gcc-3.2.3-11d-643226-log.gz.txt
Martin
Modified:
stdcxx/trunk/etc/config/windows/run_locale_utils.wsf
Modified: stdcxx/trunk/etc/config/windows/run_locale_utils.wsf
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/stdcxx/trunk/etc/config/windows/run_locale_utils.wsf?rev=643448r1=643447r2=643448view=diff
==
--- stdcxx/trunk/etc/config/windows/run_locale_utils.wsf (original)
+++ stdcxx/trunk/etc/config/windows/run_locale_utils.wsf Tue Apr 1 08:36:22
2008
@@ -711,14 +711,15 @@
{
var pcnt = 100 * (assertions - failedassertions) / assertions;
pcnt = Math.floor(pcnt + 0.5);
-outstrm.WriteLine(#
+---++++);
-outstrm.WriteLine(# | DIAGNOSTIC| ACTIVE | TOTAL
|INACTIVE|);
-outstrm.WriteLine(#
+---++++);
-outstrm.WriteLine(# | (S7) ASSERTION| +
FormatNumber(failedassertions, 6)
-+ | + FormatNumber(assertions, 6) + | + FormatNumber(pcnt, 5) +
% |);
-outstrm.WriteLine(#
+---++++);
+outstrm.WriteLine(#
+---+--+--+--+);
+outstrm.WriteLine(# | DIAGNOSTIC| ACTIVE | TOTAL |
INACTIVE |);
+outstrm.WriteLine(#
+---+--+--+--+);
+outstrm.WriteLine(# | (S7) ASSERTION| +
FormatNumber(failedassertions, 8)
++ | + FormatNumber(assertions, 8) + | + FormatNumber(pcnt, 7) +
% |);
+outstrm.WriteLine(#
+---+--+--+--+);
outstrm.WriteLine();
}
+outstrm.WriteLine(## Warnings = 0);
outstrm.WriteLine(## Assertions = + assertions);
outstrm.WriteLine(## FailedAssertions = + failedassertions);
outstrm.WriteLine();