DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30960] New: - MessageResourceConfig.nullValue = false
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30960. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30960 MessageResourceConfig.nullValue = false Summary: MessageResourceConfig.nullValue = false Product: Struts Version: Nightly Build Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Minor Priority: Other Component: Controller AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I created a patch for clazz MessageResourceConfig.java it sets the default for *null* to 'false'. so users, that are missing an i18n-key/value in their Foo.properties will become an *error*-message like: ???de.memberForm.nameOfMember??? instead of an execption. in JSF this is the default-behaivor. I guess it is more clearer to (new) users... ? Serverity was set to MINOR, since this is not a showstopper... :) but it is also not an Enhancement... ;-) Regards, Matthias - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30960] - MessageResourceConfig.nullValue = false
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30960. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30960 MessageResourceConfig.nullValue = false --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-08-31 12:58 --- Created an attachment (id=12580) change of 'nullValue' - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New Struts download page
Doh! lolthe first mirror to come up for me was playboy. Not sure if you saw my desperate plea on the infrastructure list..too funny!! -- James Mitchell Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist EdgeTech, Inc. 678.910.8017 AIM: jmitchtx - Original Message - From: Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004 1:09 AM Subject: New Struts download page I've created a new Struts download page, that hooks up to the mirrors, here: http://struts.apache.org/download.cgi This is based on the HTTPD download page, but slotted into the Struts web site framework. At this time, the source for this page (i.e. download.xml) is *not* checked in to CVS, because the xmlvalidate tasks in the build are not at all happy with what's generated for the img elements, and I figured it was more important to get something working up there than futz with a fussy validator. ;-) I'll try to sort this out, and check in, soon. Sometime fairly soon, we'll want to rationalise this download page with the 'acquiring' page, which I did not attempt to update. However, in the short term, I think we can probably announce 1.2.2 and point people to this new download page. -- Martin Cooper - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[ANN] Struts 1.2.2 release is now available for download.
The Apache Struts team is extremely proud to announce the availability of Struts 1.2.2. This release represents the first official release available for General Availability since Struts 1.1. You can find all of the features, enhancements, and bug fixes in the release notes listed below. I would personally like to send a big _THANK YOU_ to all the users and developers who help make this community project possible and an even bigger _THANK YOU_ to the developers and committers who volunteer their time and talents to this (as well as other) Open Source project. Pat yourselves on the back, you are doing a stellar job Release notes: http://struts.apache.org/userGuide/release-notes.html You can access the binary, source, or library distributions from any of our mirrors http://struts.apache.org/download.cgi The Apache Struts Team -- James Mitchell Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist EdgeTech, Inc. 678.910.8017 AIM: jmitchtx - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [ANN] Struts 1.2.2 release is now available for download.
Susan Bradeen wrote: And the biggest _THANK YOU_ to you, James, for leading the team through the release process home stretch. Congratulations, Struts Team. Drinks all around! :) dittos to you guys. (Hopefully soon this lazy bumb typing this message can try and get involved with actually helping the development effort some time soon). James you're an inspiration:) -- Rick - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30960] - MessageResourceConfig.nullValue = false
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30960. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30960 MessageResourceConfig.nullValue = false [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||LATER --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-08-31 14:48 --- We may be able to change this on a major version change of Struts. Prior to that, the issue is that it breaks backwards compatibility by inverting the default. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New Struts download page
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 09:52:23 -0400, James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Doh! lolthe first mirror to come up for me was playboy. Not sure if you saw my desperate plea on the infrastructure list..too funny!! Oh, you must not know about the if (user has complained about Playboy mirror) select Playboy as default mirror clause in the scripts... ;-) -- Martin Cooper -- James Mitchell Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist EdgeTech, Inc. 678.910.8017 AIM: jmitchtx - Original Message - From: Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004 1:09 AM Subject: New Struts download page I've created a new Struts download page, that hooks up to the mirrors, here: http://struts.apache.org/download.cgi This is based on the HTTPD download page, but slotted into the Struts web site framework. At this time, the source for this page (i.e. download.xml) is *not* checked in to CVS, because the xmlvalidate tasks in the build are not at all happy with what's generated for the img elements, and I figured it was more important to get something working up there than futz with a fussy validator. ;-) I'll try to sort this out, and check in, soon. Sometime fairly soon, we'll want to rationalise this download page with the 'acquiring' page, which I did not attempt to update. However, in the short term, I think we can probably announce 1.2.2 and point people to this new download page. -- Martin Cooper - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30960] - MessageResourceConfig.nullValue = false
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30960. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30960 MessageResourceConfig.nullValue = false --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-08-31 14:59 --- This may be better suited over in commons-resources, since we will be rolling over to that package soon. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Move minimum to 2.3 (was Re: Changing how CommonsMultipartRequestHandler handles text parameters?)
-0 (not beeing commiter) on servlet 2.4 as it is not 'enough' available on production servers Lot's of the apps I maintain are running under websphere 5 (some of them use websphere 4). I agree JSP2.0 have interesting features, but can't we wait servlet 2.4 to be avaible on (almost) all current application server ? I like your idea Craig. +1 for going to 2.4. -James -Original Message- From: Craig McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 30, 2004 12:14 PM To: Struts Developers List Subject: Re: [VOTE] Move minimum to 2.3 (was Re: Changing how CommonsMultipartRequestHandler handles text parameters?) On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 06:09:02 -0400, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It was once proposed that we leap frog Serlvet 2.3 and go straight to 2.4 for Struts 2.x. But, I continually see references to little things people could do better if our minimum were Servlet 2.3. Since no code has been written for Struts 2.x, it does not seem reasonable to hold back enhancements that we could make today, if our minimum platform were Servlet 2.3. Here's my +1 for moving the minimum platform to Servlet 2.3, today. Carpe Diem! -Ted. +1 to updating the minimum platform for Struts .Next to be Servlet 2.3 (and JSP 1.2), although the technical benefits of going one step further (2.4/2.0) are so compelling I'd be in favor of going there instead: * Servlet filters can run on request dispatcher calls * Cleaned up semantics for internationalized apps * JSP 2.0 has many new features, including EL everywhere, simple tag apis, tag files, much better XML syntax, ... The counterbalance, of course, is the smaller number of deployed containers supporting these APIs -- but that couterbalance gets smaller over time, and I suspect will be non-existent by the time we could get to a complete enough release to be GA quality. I also suspect, given our track record :-), that re-engineering Struts from scratch based on the latest platform APIs wouldn't take more time than a gradual refactoring from the current code. Regarding branches, STRUTS_1_2_BRANCH should definitely be created if it's not yet, for ongoing development on that track, so the head can be used for new development. And, since we'll contemplate non-backwards-compatible changes anyway, let's just call it Struts 2 and be done with it. Craig On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 10:47:01 -0700, Martin Cooper wrote: I would be very much in favour of breaking out the multipart ?handling properties into their own section. However, I don't really ?want to do this now. I'd prefer to wait until we rip out the ?multipart code into a filter, rationalise the interface, and better ?align the implementation with Commons FileUpload. With that set of ?changes, the specific parameters will likely change, so I'd prefer ?to change everything at once. (This is one of my own itches that ?has needed to wait for a Struts 2.x or higher, because of the ?Servlets 2.3 requirement. ;) On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 20:22:57 -0500, Joe Germuska wrote: ?29668 is basically a statement of the problem I am facing. ?I guess ?I should have looked through bugzilla. ? ?It looks as though 29824 ?proposes using setCharacterEncoding, so I don't think it would ?compile with Servlet 2.2. ?(I haven't tried it yet.) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Our name has changed. Please update your address book to the following format: [EMAIL PROTECTED]. This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the Capgemini Group. It is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Move minimum to 2.3 (was Re: Changing how CommonsMultipartRequestHandler handles text parameters?)
+1 , 2.3 +1, 2.4 - Since we seem to take 18mo between releases, (that's just the way it is) we may as well go for 2.4. -Original Message- From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 30, 2004 10:09 AM To: 'Struts Developers List', 'Struts Developers List' Subject: [VOTE] Move minimum to 2.3 (was Re: Changing how CommonsMultipartRequestHandler handles text parameters?) It was once proposed that we leap frog Serlvet 2.3 and go straight to 2.4 for Struts 2.x. But, I continually see references to little things people could do better if our minimum were Servlet 2.3. Since no code has been written for Struts 2.x, it does not seem reasonable to hold back enhancements that we could make today, if our minimum platform were Servlet 2.3. Here's my +1 for moving the minimum platform to Servlet 2.3, today. Carpe Diem! -Ted. On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 10:47:01 -0700, Martin Cooper wrote: I would be very much in favour of breaking out the multipart ?handling properties into their own section. However, I don't really ?want to do this now. I'd prefer to wait until we rip out the ?multipart code into a filter, rationalise the interface, and better ?align the implementation with Commons FileUpload. With that set of ?changes, the specific parameters will likely change, so I'd prefer ?to change everything at once. (This is one of my own itches that ?has needed to wait for a Struts 2.x or higher, because of the ?Servlets 2.3 requirement. ;) On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 20:22:57 -0500, Joe Germuska wrote: ?29668 is basically a statement of the problem I am facing. ?I guess ?I should have looked through bugzilla. ? ?It looks as though 29824 ?proposes using setCharacterEncoding, so I don't think it would ?compile with Servlet 2.2. ?(I haven't tried it yet.) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Move minimum to 2.3 (was Re: Changing how CommonsMultipartRequestHandler handles text parameters?)
+1 to move base Servlet API to 2.3 -0 to moving to 2.4 At this point, I think we should be conservative and wait to make 2.4 the minimum until we can explain why we need it. If that happens during the course of development, then fine, but if many users are still using Servlet 2.3, then let's not move too quickly. Perhaps we should have a similar justification for 2.3, but I guess I feel like it's old enough now that just because is an OK reason. Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blog.germuska.com In fact, when I die, if I don't hear 'A Love Supreme,' I'll turn back; I'll know I'm in the wrong place. - Carlos Santana
images
PROJECT I am trying to build an imaging module for Struts, etc, buttons. What this does is to use dynamic data on buttons, e.g. color, size, style, font, language, etc., and to create the buttons on the fly. This is, of course, done with JSP taglibs. PROBLEM My problem is that I extend the Struts SubmitTag and add various properties, very much akin to the ImageTag in Struts. Additional to the ImageTag properties, I add txtClr and bgClr properties as well as txtClrCode and bgClrCode properties. The former allow us to hardcode colors of images (buttons) and the latter to provide a dynamic value depending on what is in a container referenced with a mapBean property that is saved in session scope. When I use the code (txtClrCode and bgClrCode) properties, I eventually set them to txtClr and bgClr before writing to the response object. Also, I only use txtClrCode and bgClrCode is txtClr and bgClr are null. ANOMALY All the properties are set to null in my ImageTag class. Yet, after the initial value of a tag is set, changing the value of either the txtClrCode or the bgClrCode is not working because somehow txtClr and bgClr are not being reset to null as expected. QUESTION The computer is always right, so anyone know what I am doing wrong here? Thanks Michael McGrady - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [ANN] Struts 1.2.2 release is now available for download.
Has the home page's download links been updated yet? They still point to jakarta's download page which only has the 1.1 release. Congrats James, Ted, Martin, et al on the release. :) Don James Mitchell wrote: The Apache Struts team is extremely proud to announce the availability of Struts 1.2.2. This release represents the first official release available for General Availability since Struts 1.1. You can find all of the features, enhancements, and bug fixes in the release notes listed below. I would personally like to send a big _THANK YOU_ to all the users and developers who help make this community project possible and an even bigger _THANK YOU_ to the developers and committers who volunteer their time and talents to this (as well as other) Open Source project. Pat yourselves on the back, you are doing a stellar job Release notes: http://struts.apache.org/userGuide/release-notes.html You can access the binary, source, or library distributions from any of our mirrors http://struts.apache.org/download.cgi The Apache Struts Team -- James Mitchell Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist EdgeTech, Inc. 678.910.8017 AIM: jmitchtx - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Re: [VOTE] Move minimum to 2.3 (was Re: Changing how CommonsMultipartRequestHandler handles text parameters?)
From: Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] That justification doesn't cut it, for me at least. Based on our past behaviour, it's very likely that there will be something fairly stable that people can pick up as a nightly build long, long before the final release. That will likely still be long before the major app servers support Servlets 2.4. Please stay on 2.3 for a while... I'm on HP-UX and HP always lags behind providing Apache/Tomcat distributions. (I get the feeling we're supposed to be happy they're free and not complain.) While I don't mind using a different minor Tomcat version, I'm a little uncomfortable going to Tomcat 5 before they've officially blessed it. -- Wendy Smoak - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Move minimum to 2.3 (was Re: Changing how CommonsMultipartRequestHandler handles text parameters?)
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 11:22:56 -0500, Joe Germuska wrote: Perhaps we should have a similar justification for 2.3, but I guess I feel like it's old enough now that just because is an OK reason. Why 2.3? (1) It is preferred platform of active Struts developers. (2) It is needed for certain enhancements, including some to file upload. (3) It simplifies distribution and integration of JavaServer Faces components which are dependant on Servlet 2.3. -T. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Move minimum to 2.3 (was Re: Changing how CommonsMultipartRequestHandler handles text parameters?)
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 13:03:59 -0400, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 11:22:56 -0500, Joe Germuska wrote: Perhaps we should have a similar justification for 2.3, but I guess I feel like it's old enough now that just because is an OK reason. Why 2.3? (1) It is preferred platform of active Struts developers. (2) It is needed for certain enhancements, including some to file upload. (3) It simplifies distribution and integration of JavaServer Faces components which are dependant on Servlet 2.3. There was also some discussion a LONG time ago about using a filter for the controller instead of a servlet. It's been so long, though, that I've entirely forgotten what advantages we thought we might get from that. ;-} -- Martin Cooper -T. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cvs commit: jakarta-struts/doc/proposals release-plan_1_2_0.xml
jmitchell2004/08/31 10:23:10 Modified:doc acquiring.xml announce.xml project.xml doc/faqs apps.xml doc/proposals release-plan_1_2_0.xml Log: updates for 1.2.2 and fix a bad doc reference for 1_2_0 Revision ChangesPath 1.22 +2 -7 jakarta-struts/doc/acquiring.xml Index: acquiring.xml === RCS file: /home/cvs/jakarta-struts/doc/acquiring.xml,v retrieving revision 1.21 retrieving revision 1.22 diff -u -r1.21 -r1.22 --- acquiring.xml 30 Aug 2004 20:06:50 - 1.21 +++ acquiring.xml 31 Aug 2004 17:23:09 - 1.22 @@ -34,13 +34,8 @@ ul li -a href=http://struts.apache.org/binindex.cgi; -strongStruts Binary Distribution - Struts 1.2.2 is the best available version/strong/a -/li - -li -a href=http://struts.apache.org/sourceindex.cgi; -strongStruts Source Code Distribution - Struts 1.2.2 is the best available version/strong/a +a href=http://struts.apache.org/download.cgi; +strongStruts Binary and Source Code Distributions - Struts 1.2.2 is the best available version/strong/a /li /ul 1.3 +30 -0 jakarta-struts/doc/announce.xml Index: announce.xml === RCS file: /home/cvs/jakarta-struts/doc/announce.xml,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- announce.xml 12 Jul 2004 02:18:55 - 1.2 +++ announce.xml 31 Aug 2004 17:23:09 - 1.3 @@ -11,6 +11,36 @@ section name=Announcements +h4 id=a2004083131 Augusy 2004- Struts 1.2.2 (General Availability)/h4 +p +The Apache Struts team is proud to announce the next release of Struts 1.1. +This release includes many new enhancements and features as well as numerous +bug fixes since the last generally available release (1.1). +This release supersedes the earlier 1.1 version as the latest official release +of The Apache Struts framework. +/p +ul +li +a href=http://struts.apache.org/userGuide/release-notes.html;http://struts.apache.org/userGuide/release-notes.html/a/li +/ul +p +The binary, source, and library distributions are available at +/p +ul +li +a href=http://struts.apache.org/download.cgi;http://struts.apache.org/download.cgi//a + /li +/ul +p +The library distribution contains only the requisite JARs, without the documentation or example applications. +/p +p +We invite your comments on how well this release works with your own applications. Based on feedback from the Struts community, this release may be dubbed ready for prime time and promoted to General Availabilty quality. + /p +p +Please note that Struts now uses Tomcat-style releases. If the feedback on this release were positive, Struts 1.2.1 may be promoted directly to GA, without creating yet-another distribution. If a serious problem were found and fixed, then we will issue Struts 1.2.2 and try again. +/p + h4 id=a200407 July 2004- Struts 1.2.1 (Beta) Available/h4 p The Struts team announces the release of Struts 1.2.1, currently ranked at Beta quality. 1.54 +2 -2 jakarta-struts/doc/project.xml Index: project.xml === RCS file: /home/cvs/jakarta-struts/doc/project.xml,v retrieving revision 1.53 retrieving revision 1.54 diff -u -r1.53 -r1.54 --- project.xml 24 Aug 2004 23:11:06 - 1.53 +++ project.xml 31 Aug 2004 17:23:09 - 1.54 @@ -76,11 +76,11 @@ menu name=Download item name=Binaries -href=http://jakarta.apache.org/site/binindex.cgi; +href=http://struts.apache.org/download.cgi; / item name=Source Code -href=http://jakarta.apache.org/site/sourceindex.cgi; +href=http://struts.apache.org/download.cgi; / item name=Development Releases 1.6 +1 -1 jakarta-struts/doc/faqs/apps.xml Index: apps.xml === RCS file: /home/cvs/jakarta-struts/doc/faqs/apps.xml,v retrieving revision 1.5 retrieving revision 1.6 diff -u -r1.5 -r1.6 --- apps.xml 9 Sep 2003 17:49:22 - 1.5 +++ apps.xml 31 Aug 2004 17:23:10 - 1.6 @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ outlines only one way to get started./li liThis document focuses on form/data centric applications, but may also
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30967] - InterruptedIOException on BufferedMultipartInputStream, DiskMultipartRequestHandler
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30967. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30967 InterruptedIOException on BufferedMultipartInputStream, DiskMultipartRequestHandler [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-08-31 18:14 --- First off, this would have been more appropriate as a question posted to the user list, rather than entered as a bug report. It's impossible to tell just from a stack trace whether uprading would resolve the issue or not. However, the reason the old implementation was deprecated is because it is known to be very buggy. So I would very strongly encourage you to try a later version, since there is a high probability that it will fix the problem, even if I can't guarantee it. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/validator ValidatorPlugIn.java
jmitchell2004/08/31 11:39:04
Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/validator ValidatorPlugIn.java
Log:
fix for a method missing in 1.3.1
Revision ChangesPath
1.27 +5 -5
jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/validator/ValidatorPlugIn.java
Index: ValidatorPlugIn.java
===
RCS file:
/home/cvs/jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/validator/ValidatorPlugIn.java,v
retrieving revision 1.26
retrieving revision 1.27
diff -u -r1.26 -r1.27
--- ValidatorPlugIn.java 7 Aug 2004 04:17:52 - 1.26
+++ ValidatorPlugIn.java 31 Aug 2004 18:39:04 - 1.27
@@ -167,7 +167,7 @@
resources);
servlet.getServletContext().setAttribute(STOP_ON_ERROR_KEY + '.' +
config.getPrefix(),
-
Boolean.valueOf(this.stopOnFirstError));
+ (this.stopOnFirstError ?
Boolean.TRUE : Boolean.FALSE));
} catch (Exception e) {
log.error(e.getMessage(), e);
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [ANN] Struts 1.2.2 release is now available for download.
Thanks Jim, Ted, Martin et al to make it happen On Tue, 2004-08-31 at 07:19, James Mitchell wrote: The Apache Struts team is extremely proud to announce the availability of Struts 1.2.2. This release represents the first official release available for General Availability since Struts 1.1. You can find all of the features, enhancements, and bug fixes in the release notes listed below. I would personally like to send a big _THANK YOU_ to all the users and developers who help make this community project possible and an even bigger _THANK YOU_ to the developers and committers who volunteer their time and talents to this (as well as other) Open Source project. Pat yourselves on the back, you are doing a stellar job Release notes: http://struts.apache.org/userGuide/release-notes.html You can access the binary, source, or library distributions from any of our mirrors http://struts.apache.org/download.cgi The Apache Struts Team -- James Mitchell Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist EdgeTech, Inc. 678.910.8017 AIM: jmitchtx - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [ANN] Struts 1.2.2 release is now available for download.
maybe it'd be a good idea to also post this announcement to the announcements list at jakarta (since it has a large subscription base). - robert On 31 Aug 2004, at 15:19, James Mitchell wrote: The Apache Struts team is extremely proud to announce the availability of Struts 1.2.2. This release represents the first official release available for General Availability since Struts 1.1. You can find all of the features, enhancements, and bug fixes in the release notes listed below. I would personally like to send a big _THANK YOU_ to all the users and developers who help make this community project possible and an even bigger _THANK YOU_ to the developers and committers who volunteer their time and talents to this (as well as other) Open Source project. Pat yourselves on the back, you are doing a stellar job Release notes: http://struts.apache.org/userGuide/release-notes.html You can access the binary, source, or library distributions from any of our mirrors http://struts.apache.org/download.cgi The Apache Struts Team -- James Mitchell Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist EdgeTech, Inc. 678.910.8017 AIM: jmitchtx - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [ANN] Struts 1.2.2 release is now available for download.
sure, go for it. -- James Mitchell Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist EdgeTech, Inc. 678.910.8017 AIM: jmitchtx - Original Message - From: robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004 4:19 PM Subject: Re: [ANN] Struts 1.2.2 release is now available for download. cool. is someone taking care of adding the news to the jakarta home page? (if not, i can probably handle it.) - robert On 31 Aug 2004, at 20:58, James Mitchell wrote: done. -- James Mitchell Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist EdgeTech, Inc. 678.910.8017 AIM: jmitchtx - Original Message - From: robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004 3:47 PM Subject: Re: [ANN] Struts 1.2.2 release is now available for download. maybe it'd be a good idea to also post this announcement to the announcements list at jakarta (since it has a large subscription base). - robert On 31 Aug 2004, at 15:19, James Mitchell wrote: The Apache Struts team is extremely proud to announce the availability of Struts 1.2.2. This release represents the first official release available for General Availability since Struts 1.1. You can find all of the features, enhancements, and bug fixes in the release notes listed below. I would personally like to send a big _THANK YOU_ to all the users and developers who help make this community project possible and an even bigger _THANK YOU_ to the developers and committers who volunteer their time and talents to this (as well as other) Open Source project. Pat yourselves on the back, you are doing a stellar job Release notes: http://struts.apache.org/userGuide/release-notes.html You can access the binary, source, or library distributions from any of our mirrors http://struts.apache.org/download.cgi The Apache Struts Team -- James Mitchell Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist EdgeTech, Inc. 678.910.8017 AIM: jmitchtx - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30972] New: - html:password not validated for minlength, maxlength on client
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30972.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30972
html:password not validated for minlength, maxlength on client
Summary: html:password not validated for minlength, maxlength
on client
Product: Struts
Version: 1.1 Final
Platform: All
OS/Version: Other
Status: NEW
Severity: Enhancement
Priority: Other
Component: Validator Framework
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Offer request that the client side minlength and maxlength validation script
add field type of password to the list of fields validated for length.
function validateMinLength(form) {
{snip}
if (field.type == 'text' || ==
field.type == 'textarea') { ==
{snip}
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/tiles/definition ComponentDefinitionsFactoryWrapper.java
jmitchell2004/08/31 13:41:29
Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/tiles/definition
ComponentDefinitionsFactoryWrapper.java
Log:
Boolean.valueOf(boolean) is 1.4.x, this fix will work for 1.3.1 forward
Revision ChangesPath
1.14 +4 -4
jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/tiles/definition/ComponentDefinitionsFactoryWrapper.java
Index: ComponentDefinitionsFactoryWrapper.java
===
RCS file:
/home/cvs/jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/tiles/definition/ComponentDefinitionsFactoryWrapper.java,v
retrieving revision 1.13
retrieving revision 1.14
diff -u -r1.13 -r1.14
--- ComponentDefinitionsFactoryWrapper.java 7 Aug 2004 04:17:52 - 1.13
+++ ComponentDefinitionsFactoryWrapper.java 31 Aug 2004 20:41:29 - 1.14
@@ -207,7 +207,7 @@
map.put(
DefinitionsFactoryConfig.PARSER_VALIDATE_PARAMETER_NAME,
-Boolean.valueOf(config.getParserValidate()).toString());
+(config.getParserValidate() ? Boolean.TRUE.toString() :
Boolean.FALSE.toString()));
if (!org.apache.struts.tiles.xmlDefinition.I18nFactorySet
.equals(config.getFactoryClassname())) {
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [ANN] Struts 1.2.2 release is now available for download.
done. - robert On 31 Aug 2004, at 21:19, James Mitchell wrote: sure, go for it. -- James Mitchell Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist EdgeTech, Inc. 678.910.8017 AIM: jmitchtx - Original Message - From: robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004 4:19 PM Subject: Re: [ANN] Struts 1.2.2 release is now available for download. cool. is someone taking care of adding the news to the jakarta home page? (if not, i can probably handle it.) - robert On 31 Aug 2004, at 20:58, James Mitchell wrote: done. -- James Mitchell Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist EdgeTech, Inc. 678.910.8017 AIM: jmitchtx - Original Message - From: robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004 3:47 PM Subject: Re: [ANN] Struts 1.2.2 release is now available for download. maybe it'd be a good idea to also post this announcement to the announcements list at jakarta (since it has a large subscription base). - robert On 31 Aug 2004, at 15:19, James Mitchell wrote: The Apache Struts team is extremely proud to announce the availability of Struts 1.2.2. This release represents the first official release available for General Availability since Struts 1.1. You can find all of the features, enhancements, and bug fixes in the release notes listed below. I would personally like to send a big _THANK YOU_ to all the users and developers who help make this community project possible and an even bigger _THANK YOU_ to the developers and committers who volunteer their time and talents to this (as well as other) Open Source project. Pat yourselves on the back, you are doing a stellar job Release notes: http://struts.apache.org/userGuide/release-notes.html You can access the binary, source, or library distributions from any of our mirrors http://struts.apache.org/download.cgi The Apache Struts Team -- James Mitchell Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist EdgeTech, Inc. 678.910.8017 AIM: jmitchtx --- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: JIRA Conversion (was RE: patch to make sure streams get closed)
One very good reason to stay with Bugzilla is that we often exchange tickets with Jakarta Commons. So, until Jakarta Commons changes to another system, I'm amending my previous +1 to -1. Should Jakarta Commons ever change, then I would be in favor of migrating with them, to retain compatibility. -Ted. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1.2.2 : Different versions of validator in binary and lib
Hi! It appaears that there are different versions of the commons-validator in the new binary and lib. Is this meant to be ? --- jakarta-struts-1.2.2.tar.gz/dist/lib/commons-validator.jar/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF --- Manifest-Version: 1.0 Ant-Version: Apache Ant 1.5.3 Created-By: 1.4.2-b28 (Sun Microsystems Inc.) Extension-Name: org.apache.commons.validator Specification-Vendor: Apache Software Foundation Specification-Version: 1.0 Implementation-Vendor: Apache Software Foundation Implementation-Version: 1.1-dev --- jakarta-struts-1.2.2.tar.gz/dist/lib/commons-validator.jar/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF --- --- jakarta-struts-1.2.2-lib.tar.gz/commons-validator.jar/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF --- Manifest-Version: 1.0 Ant-Version: Apache Ant 1.5.3 Created-By: Apache Jakarta Maven Built-By: ted Package: org.apache.commons.validator Build-Jdk: 1.4.2_01 Extension-Name: commons-validator Specification-Version: Specification-Vendor: The Apache Software Foundation Specification-Title: Commons Validator Implementation-Version: 1.1.3 Implementation-Vendor: The Apache Software Foundation Implementation-Vendor-Id: --- jakarta-struts-1.2.2-lib.tar.gz/commons-validator.jar/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Struts 1.2.2 Dead in the Water?
No - Original Message - From: Michael McGrady [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 5:52 AM Subject: Re: Struts 1.2.2 Dead in the Water? Niall Pemberton wrote: I've just got round to testing Struts 1.2.2 and found the following major problems: * The binary distribution contains the wrong version of commons validator jar (the lib distribution seems to have the right one). * Struts 1.2.2 is incompatible with JDK 1.3 because it uses Boolean.valueOf(boolean) introduced in JDK 1.4 This is in the release notes, I think. Isn't it? Michael - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cvs commit: jakarta-struts build.xml project.xml
martinc 2004/08/31 22:22:29 Modified:.build.xml project.xml Log: Update the build version to 1.2.3. Revision ChangesPath 1.137 +1 -1 jakarta-struts/build.xml Index: build.xml === RCS file: /home/cvs/jakarta-struts/build.xml,v retrieving revision 1.136 retrieving revision 1.137 diff -u -r1.136 -r1.137 --- build.xml 25 Aug 2004 11:49:06 - 1.136 +++ build.xml 1 Sep 2004 05:22:28 - 1.137 @@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ property name=project.name value=jakarta-struts/ !-- Version of the project -- -property name=project.version value=1.2.2/ +property name=project.version value=1.2.3/ !-- == Derived Properties -- 1.34 +11 -6 jakarta-struts/project.xml Index: project.xml === RCS file: /home/cvs/jakarta-struts/project.xml,v retrieving revision 1.33 retrieving revision 1.34 diff -u -r1.33 -r1.34 --- project.xml 27 Aug 2004 17:01:35 - 1.33 +++ project.xml 1 Sep 2004 05:22:28 - 1.34 @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ pomVersion3/pomVersion namestruts/name idstruts/id - currentVersion1.2.2/currentVersion + currentVersion1.2.3/currentVersion organization nameThe Apache Software Foundation/name urlhttp://struts.apache.org//url @@ -43,11 +43,16 @@ name1.2.0/name tagSTRUTS_1_2_0/tag /version - version -id1.2.1/id -name1.2.1/name -tagSTRUTS_1_2_1/tag - /version +version + id1.2.1/id + name1.2.1/name + tagSTRUTS_1_2_1/tag +/version +version + id1.2.2/id + name1.2.2/name + tagSTRUTS_1_2_2/tag +/version /versions mailingLists mailingList - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
