Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.3.1.1 Vote (fast track)

2011-12-28 Thread Rene Gielen
Thanks for offering your help. If you feel like being able to test the
binary distribution announced here and to give feedback, that is
qualification enough :) We highly appreciate every casted vote.

For details on the voting process and the difference between binding and
non-binding votes, please see the Decision Making and Voting section
in [1]. But remember that even though your vote will be non-binding, it
will be taken into account by the PMC. Especially if you describe the
reasons for your particular vote, say Leave at test build since you
found a show stopper, it is likely to influence or change the PMC
members' binding votes.

- René

[1] http://struts.apache.org/bylaws.html

On 27.12.11 23:48, Jeffrey Black wrote:
 Not sure whether I qualify, but I would be happy to test it for you.
 
 Best,
 
 jb
 
 On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Rainer Hermanns herma...@aixcept.dewrote:
 
 Sorry, I've no time to test the short track release this time.
 Could someone step in?

 cheers,
 Rainer



-- 
René Gielen
http://twitter.com/rgielen

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.3.1.1 Vote (fast track)

2011-12-28 Thread Dave Newton
How should I vote if I can't run the tests at the moment, but I can review
the source changes?

So confused. Hmm, maybe I can run tests after all--I'll try tonight.

On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 4:36 AM, Rene Gielen rgie...@apache.org wrote:

 Thanks for offering your help. If you feel like being able to test the
 binary distribution announced here and to give feedback, that is
 qualification enough :) We highly appreciate every casted vote.

 For details on the voting process and the difference between binding and
 non-binding votes, please see the Decision Making and Voting section
 in [1]. But remember that even though your vote will be non-binding, it
 will be taken into account by the PMC. Especially if you describe the
 reasons for your particular vote, say Leave at test build since you
 found a show stopper, it is likely to influence or change the PMC
 members' binding votes.

 - René

 [1] http://struts.apache.org/bylaws.html

 On 27.12.11 23:48, Jeffrey Black wrote:
  Not sure whether I qualify, but I would be happy to test it for you.
 
  Best,
 
  jb
 
  On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Rainer Hermanns herma...@aixcept.de
 wrote:
 
  Sorry, I've no time to test the short track release this time.
  Could someone step in?
 
  cheers,
  Rainer
 
 

 --
 René Gielen
 http://twitter.com/rgielen

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org




Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.3.1.1 Vote (fast track)

2011-12-28 Thread Martin Cooper
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 6:35 AM, Dave Newton davelnew...@gmail.com wrote:
 How should I vote if I can't run the tests at the moment, but I can review
 the source changes?

Given that the vote is on the actual bits, consider this. Suppose that
somehow Lukasz's build process got completely messed up, and the zip
file does nothing useful. At the same time, you reviewed the source
code, not the bits, and you voted for GA. Other people did the same
thing, and the end result was a GA release that didn't even work.

--
Martin Cooper


 So confused. Hmm, maybe I can run tests after all--I'll try tonight.

 On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 4:36 AM, Rene Gielen rgie...@apache.org wrote:

 Thanks for offering your help. If you feel like being able to test the
 binary distribution announced here and to give feedback, that is
 qualification enough :) We highly appreciate every casted vote.

 For details on the voting process and the difference between binding and
 non-binding votes, please see the Decision Making and Voting section
 in [1]. But remember that even though your vote will be non-binding, it
 will be taken into account by the PMC. Especially if you describe the
 reasons for your particular vote, say Leave at test build since you
 found a show stopper, it is likely to influence or change the PMC
 members' binding votes.

 - René

 [1] http://struts.apache.org/bylaws.html

 On 27.12.11 23:48, Jeffrey Black wrote:
  Not sure whether I qualify, but I would be happy to test it for you.
 
  Best,
 
  jb
 
  On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Rainer Hermanns herma...@aixcept.de
 wrote:
 
  Sorry, I've no time to test the short track release this time.
  Could someone step in?
 
  cheers,
  Rainer
 
 

 --
 René Gielen
 http://twitter.com/rgielen

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.3.1.1 Vote (fast track)

2011-12-28 Thread Dave Newton
Stupid bits.
On Dec 28, 2011 12:29 PM, Martin Cooper mart...@apache.org wrote:

 On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 6:35 AM, Dave Newton davelnew...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  How should I vote if I can't run the tests at the moment, but I can
 review
  the source changes?

 Given that the vote is on the actual bits, consider this. Suppose that
 somehow Lukasz's build process got completely messed up, and the zip
 file does nothing useful. At the same time, you reviewed the source
 code, not the bits, and you voted for GA. Other people did the same
 thing, and the end result was a GA release that didn't even work.

 --
 Martin Cooper


  So confused. Hmm, maybe I can run tests after all--I'll try tonight.
 
  On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 4:36 AM, Rene Gielen rgie...@apache.org wrote:
 
  Thanks for offering your help. If you feel like being able to test the
  binary distribution announced here and to give feedback, that is
  qualification enough :) We highly appreciate every casted vote.
 
  For details on the voting process and the difference between binding and
  non-binding votes, please see the Decision Making and Voting section
  in [1]. But remember that even though your vote will be non-binding, it
  will be taken into account by the PMC. Especially if you describe the
  reasons for your particular vote, say Leave at test build since you
  found a show stopper, it is likely to influence or change the PMC
  members' binding votes.
 
  - René
 
  [1] http://struts.apache.org/bylaws.html
 
  On 27.12.11 23:48, Jeffrey Black wrote:
   Not sure whether I qualify, but I would be happy to test it for you.
  
   Best,
  
   jb
  
   On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Rainer Hermanns herma...@aixcept.de
  wrote:
  
   Sorry, I've no time to test the short track release this time.
   Could someone step in?
  
   cheers,
   Rainer
  
  
 
  --
  René Gielen
  http://twitter.com/rgielen
 
  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
  For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
 
 

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org