Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.3.1 Vote

2011-12-16 Thread Martin Cooper
2011/12/12 Łukasz Lenart lukasz.len...@googlemail.com:
 2011/12/9 Martin Cooper mart...@apache.org:
 We used to post the test build, announce it, wait for a week to give
 people some time to try it out, and then call the vote, since the vote
 is time-limited. Did we stop doing that at some point, and only give
 people 3 days (i.e. the duration of the vote) to test now?

 As a follow up, I've added one more point to the Release guide [1], is
 it enough ?

That looks fine, as long as everyone is in agreement.

The question in my earlier message was just that - a question. The
answer, after digging around in the archives, appears to be yes, we
did stop doing that, quite some time ago, and somehow I never noticed
until now. As far as I can tell, we didn't make a conscious decision
to change; it just happened one time when somebody took on the release
task. Nobody noticed, and we've kept doing it that way ever since.

As for which way we do it going forward, it really depends on how
quickly people - PMC members especially, but not only PMC members -
feel they can test a new build. It is *very* important that people
vote, and test prior to it, based on the actual bits posted by the RM;
not their own build, or a recent snapshot they may have downloaded. If
enough people believe they can pick up a new build immediately,
incorporate it into their own environment, test it thoroughly, and
then vote, all within 72 hours, then there shouldn't be a problem with
continuing the way we have been. If that seems a bit tight, then we
should leave some time for testing before calling the vote.

--
Martin Cooper


 [1] 
 https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WW/Building+Struts+2+-+Normal+release#BuildingStruts2-Normalrelease-Announceavailability


 Kind regards
 --
 Łukasz
 + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
 Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.3.1 Vote

2011-12-12 Thread Rainer Hermanns
All tests in current projects passed.

+1 binding

[ ] Leave at test build
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[x] General Availability (GA) 

cheers,
Rainer

Rainer Hermanns
aixcept
Willibrordstraße 82
52134 Herzogenrath - Germany
w: http://aixcept.de/
t:   +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11
f:   +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13
m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12




Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.3.1 Vote

2011-12-12 Thread Łukasz Lenart
W dniu 9 grudnia 2011 08:02 użytkownik Łukasz Lenart
lukasz.len...@googlemail.com napisał:
 [X] General Availability (GA)

+1 binding


Kind regards
-- 
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.3.1 Vote

2011-12-12 Thread Łukasz Lenart
2011/12/9 Martin Cooper mart...@apache.org:
 We used to post the test build, announce it, wait for a week to give
 people some time to try it out, and then call the vote, since the vote
 is time-limited. Did we stop doing that at some point, and only give
 people 3 days (i.e. the duration of the vote) to test now?

As a follow up, I've added one more point to the Release guide [1], is
it enough ?

[1] 
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WW/Building+Struts+2+-+Normal+release#BuildingStruts2-Normalrelease-Announceavailability


Kind regards
-- 
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.3.1 Vote

2011-12-11 Thread Christian Grobmeier
2011/12/9 Łukasz Lenart lukasz.len...@googlemail.com:
 [ ] Leave at test build[ ] Alpha[ ] Beta

[X] General Availability (GA)

(non-binding)

I have tested it against a Snapshot version for a long time. Today I
have used the 2.3.1 version and runned my tests against it (in
addition to monkey testing on my app). All well.

Cheers,
Christian

 Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC
 members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least
 three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s.
 The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon request.
 A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or downgrade the quality
 of the release based on future experience. If an initial vote
 designates the build as Beta, the release will be submitted for
 mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public
 beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user
 list.
 As always, the act of voting carries certain obligations. A binding
 vote not only states an opinion, but means that the voter is agreeing
 to help do the work

 Kind regards
 --
 Łukasz
 + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
 Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org




-- 
http://www.grobmeier.de
https://www.timeandbill.de

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.3.1 Vote

2011-12-11 Thread Dave Newton
 [ ] Leave at test build
 [ ] Alpha
 [ ] Beta
 [X] General Availability (GA) (binding)

Dave

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.3.1 Vote

2011-12-09 Thread Maurizio Cucchiara
I've been using the snapshot version for a long time now.

+1


Twitter :http://www.twitter.com/m_cucchiara
G+  :https://plus.google.com/107903711540963855921
Linkedin:http://www.linkedin.com/in/mauriziocucchiara

Maurizio Cucchiara


On 9 December 2011 08:02, Łukasz Lenart lukasz.len...@googlemail.comwrote:

 The Struts 2.3.1 test build is now available.
 Release notes:* [http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/version-notes-231.html]
 Distribution:* [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.3.1/]
 Maven 2 staging repository:*
 [https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestruts-300/]
 Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond
 with a vote on its quality:
 [ ] Leave at test build[ ] Alpha[ ] Beta[ ] General Availability (GA)
 Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC
 members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least
 three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s.
 The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon request.
 A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or downgrade the quality
 of the release based on future experience. If an initial vote
 designates the build as Beta, the release will be submitted for
 mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public
 beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user
 list.
 As always, the act of voting carries certain obligations. A binding
 vote not only states an opinion, but means that the voter is agreeing
 to help do the work

 Kind regards
 --
 Łukasz
 + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
 Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org




Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.3.1 Vote

2011-12-09 Thread Johannes Geppert
+1 not binding

[ ] Leave at test build
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[x] General Availability (GA) 

Johannes

-
web: http://www.jgeppert.com
twitter: http://twitter.com/jogep
--
View this message in context: 
http://struts.1045723.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Struts-2-3-1-Vote-tp5060882p5062341.html
Sent from the Struts - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.3.1 Vote

2011-12-09 Thread Martin Cooper
We used to post the test build, announce it, wait for a week to give
people some time to try it out, and then call the vote, since the vote
is time-limited. Did we stop doing that at some point, and only give
people 3 days (i.e. the duration of the vote) to test now?

--
Martin Cooper


2011/12/8 Łukasz Lenart lukasz.len...@googlemail.com:
 The Struts 2.3.1 test build is now available.
 Release notes:* [http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/version-notes-231.html]
 Distribution:* [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.3.1/]
 Maven 2 staging repository:*
 [https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestruts-300/]
 Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond
 with a vote on its quality:
 [ ] Leave at test build[ ] Alpha[ ] Beta[ ] General Availability (GA)
 Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC
 members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least
 three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s.
 The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon request.
 A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or downgrade the quality
 of the release based on future experience. If an initial vote
 designates the build as Beta, the release will be submitted for
 mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public
 beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user
 list.
 As always, the act of voting carries certain obligations. A binding
 vote not only states an opinion, but means that the voter is agreeing
 to help do the work

 Kind regards
 --
 Łukasz
 + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
 Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.3.1 Vote

2011-12-09 Thread Martin Cooper
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 6:53 AM, Maurizio Cucchiara
mcucchi...@apache.org wrote:
 I've been using the snapshot version for a long time now.

Remember that you are voting on the *actual bits* that Lukasz posted,
not a close facsimile that you might have used recently.

 +1

To what? The vote is a quality vote, with 4 available choices. You
need to pick the quality level that you are willing to tell the world
you will stand by. :-)

--
Martin Cooper


 Twitter     :http://www.twitter.com/m_cucchiara
 G+          :https://plus.google.com/107903711540963855921
 Linkedin    :http://www.linkedin.com/in/mauriziocucchiara

 Maurizio Cucchiara


 On 9 December 2011 08:02, Łukasz Lenart lukasz.len...@googlemail.comwrote:

 The Struts 2.3.1 test build is now available.
 Release notes:* [http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/version-notes-231.html]
 Distribution:* [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.3.1/]
 Maven 2 staging repository:*
 [https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestruts-300/]
 Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond
 with a vote on its quality:
 [ ] Leave at test build[ ] Alpha[ ] Beta[ ] General Availability (GA)
 Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC
 members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least
 three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s.
 The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon request.
 A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or downgrade the quality
 of the release based on future experience. If an initial vote
 designates the build as Beta, the release will be submitted for
 mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public
 beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user
 list.
 As always, the act of voting carries certain obligations. A binding
 vote not only states an opinion, but means that the voter is agreeing
 to help do the work

 Kind regards
 --
 Łukasz
 + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
 Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.3.1 Vote

2011-12-09 Thread Maurizio Cucchiara
Sorry,

1+

[ ] Leave at test build
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[x] General Availability (GA)

Twitter     :http://www.twitter.com/m_cucchiara
G+          :https://plus.google.com/107903711540963855921
Linkedin    :http://www.linkedin.com/in/mauriziocucchiara

Maurizio Cucchiara

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.3.1 Vote

2011-12-09 Thread Łukasz Lenart
2011/12/9 Martin Cooper mart...@apache.org:
 We used to post the test build, announce it, wait for a week to give
 people some time to try it out, and then call the vote, since the vote
 is time-limited. Did we stop doing that at some point, and only give
 people 3 days (i.e. the duration of the vote) to test now?

I was always doing that way and no one had been complaining, there is
no word about that in the guideline [1]. I'm not saying it doesn't
make sense, but you really embarrassed me :/

If so, I can cancel the Vote, give people some time and start over.

[1] http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/building-struts-2-normal-release.html


Regards
-- 
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.3.1 Vote

2011-12-09 Thread Matt Raible
I tried it 2.3.1 in AppFuse and its archetypes and all tests pass.

+1 binding

[ ] Leave at test build
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[x] General Availability (GA) 


On Dec 9, 2011, at 12:02 AM, Łukasz Lenart wrote:

 The Struts 2.3.1 test build is now available.
 Release notes:* [http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/version-notes-231.html]
 Distribution:* [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.3.1/]
 Maven 2 staging repository:*
 [https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestruts-300/]
 Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond
 with a vote on its quality:
 [ ] Leave at test build[ ] Alpha[ ] Beta[ ] General Availability (GA)
 Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC
 members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least
 three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s.
 The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon request.
 A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or downgrade the quality
 of the release based on future experience. If an initial vote
 designates the build as Beta, the release will be submitted for
 mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public
 beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user
 list.
 As always, the act of voting carries certain obligations. A binding
 vote not only states an opinion, but means that the voter is agreeing
 to help do the work
 
 Kind regards
 -- 
 Łukasz
 + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
 Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org



[VOTE] Struts 2.3.1 Vote

2011-12-08 Thread Łukasz Lenart
The Struts 2.3.1 test build is now available.
Release notes:* [http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/version-notes-231.html]
Distribution:* [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.3.1/]
Maven 2 staging repository:*
[https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestruts-300/]
Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond
with a vote on its quality:
[ ] Leave at test build[ ] Alpha[ ] Beta[ ] General Availability (GA)
Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC
members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least
three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s.
The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon request.
A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or downgrade the quality
of the release based on future experience. If an initial vote
designates the build as Beta, the release will be submitted for
mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public
beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user
list.
As always, the act of voting carries certain obligations. A binding
vote not only states an opinion, but means that the voter is agreeing
to help do the work

Kind regards
-- 
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org