Re: Unapproved licenses
2010/12/5 Martin Cooper mart...@apache.org: Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the \License\) Comparing that with what's written here: http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#headers suggests that it's wrong, but it looks to me like that RAT code may be looking for something that *used* to be considered correct, and therefore probably exists in a lot of places. Note that the RAT source you're referring to is itself old, and has been replaced by what's in the Incubator. The project page for it clearly states This project is being retained only for history purposes.. We need to be using what's in the Incubator, not what's known to be obsolete. The latest Apache version is also looking for the same header but it also looks for an url - either first or second must be correct. And my problem was related to wrong url for scm tag in pom, I've updated all of them and the release is almost ready to Vote. The last problem are the missing asc files for OSGi bundles. I have them locally, but they haven't been uploaded to the staging repository. I've already asked guys from INFRA and waiting (d... :P) Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ Kapituła Javarsovia 2010 http://javarsovia.pl - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
Re: Unapproved licenses
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 3:50 AM, Lukasz Lenart lukasz.len...@googlemail.com wrote: 2010/12/5 Martin Cooper mart...@apache.org: I guess the real question is whether or not there is some other license in there, and if so, how that's categorized at the ASF. Hmm... my thought is that it never worked :P, just Maven 3 showed it as a problem. I've reviewed the source code of RAT tool [1] and a file to match the ASF license must have such a header Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the \License\) Comparing that with what's written here: http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#headers suggests that it's wrong, but it looks to me like that RAT code may be looking for something that *used* to be considered correct, and therefore probably exists in a lot of places. Note that the RAT source you're referring to is itself old, and has been replaced by what's in the Incubator. The project page for it clearly states This project is being retained only for history purposes.. We need to be using what's in the Incubator, not what's known to be obsolete. -- Martin Cooper I don't know if it's a correct header, so then should we use rat plugin? You might want to check with the RAT folks (via their own mailing list) to see if there's actually a problem here or not. Thanks, I will try but since the project is in Incubator and Struts is using Codehause version it can be hard ;-) [1] http://code.google.com/p/arat/source/browse/trunk/rat/src/java/rat/analysis/license/ApacheSoftwareLicense20.java Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ Kapituła Javarsovia 2010 http://javarsovia.pl - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
Re: Unapproved licenses
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 12:26 AM, Lukasz Lenart lukasz.len...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, I'm running a new release process and during launching mvn release:perform rat plugin reported unapproved license in app/jboss-blank/pom.xml - Apache License Header is missing. The strange thing is that it was already included in the latest 2.2.1 release. I'm suspecting it's because of I'm using Maven 3 to do that ;-) I guess the real question is whether or not there is some other license in there, and if so, how that's categorized at the ASF. You might want to check with the RAT folks (via their own mailing list) to see if there's actually a problem here or not. -- Martin Cooper And to be more mysterious, also main struts2-parent pom.xml is missing the header but rat plugin isn't complaining :P How to obey that without rollbacking all the changes and adding required headers? Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ Kapituła Javarsovia 2010 http://javarsovia.pl PS. Anyway it's a huge work for the future to adjust project to Maven 3 :D - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
Unapproved licenses
Hi, I'm running a new release process and during launching mvn release:perform rat plugin reported unapproved license in app/jboss-blank/pom.xml - Apache License Header is missing. The strange thing is that it was already included in the latest 2.2.1 release. I'm suspecting it's because of I'm using Maven 3 to do that ;-) And to be more mysterious, also main struts2-parent pom.xml is missing the header but rat plugin isn't complaining :P How to obey that without rollbacking all the changes and adding required headers? Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ Kapituła Javarsovia 2010 http://javarsovia.pl PS. Anyway it's a huge work for the future to adjust project to Maven 3 :D - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
