Re: Unit test error for xwork-core in trunk
We must wait with that, till we solve the issue with Ognl Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/ 2011/6/7 Maurizio Cucchiara mcucchi...@apache.org: +1 for package renaming -1 for the lost of the separation between web and non-web stuff On 7 June 2011 08:20, Lukasz Lenart lukasz.len...@googlemail.com wrote: That's right just to rename the packages ... and we will see what next. Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/ 2011/6/5 Steven Benitez steven.beni...@gmail.com: Perhaps migrate the package structure to org.apache.struts.xwork and keep it as a separate jar for now to accomodate the non-web users. Then if we opt to merge it in the future it will already have the uniform package structure and still be semi-partitioned in the xwork sub-package. On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Dale Newfield d...@newfield.org wrote: I assume you meant losing instead of using? -Dale On Jun 5, 2011, at 3:17 PM, Dave Newton davelnew...@gmail.com wrote: I'm nervous about using the clean delineation between the web and non-web bits. I like that separation. Dave - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
Re: Unit test error for xwork-core in trunk
That's right just to rename the packages ... and we will see what next. Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/ 2011/6/5 Steven Benitez steven.beni...@gmail.com: Perhaps migrate the package structure to org.apache.struts.xwork and keep it as a separate jar for now to accomodate the non-web users. Then if we opt to merge it in the future it will already have the uniform package structure and still be semi-partitioned in the xwork sub-package. On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Dale Newfield d...@newfield.org wrote: I assume you meant losing instead of using? -Dale On Jun 5, 2011, at 3:17 PM, Dave Newton davelnew...@gmail.com wrote: I'm nervous about using the clean delineation between the web and non-web bits. I like that separation. Dave - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
Re: Unit test error for xwork-core in trunk
+1 for package renaming -1 for the lost of the separation between web and non-web stuff On 7 June 2011 08:20, Lukasz Lenart lukasz.len...@googlemail.com wrote: That's right just to rename the packages ... and we will see what next. Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/ 2011/6/5 Steven Benitez steven.beni...@gmail.com: Perhaps migrate the package structure to org.apache.struts.xwork and keep it as a separate jar for now to accomodate the non-web users. Then if we opt to merge it in the future it will already have the uniform package structure and still be semi-partitioned in the xwork sub-package. On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Dale Newfield d...@newfield.org wrote: I assume you meant losing instead of using? -Dale On Jun 5, 2011, at 3:17 PM, Dave Newton davelnew...@gmail.com wrote: I'm nervous about using the clean delineation between the web and non-web bits. I like that separation. Dave - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
Re: Unit test error for xwork-core in trunk
2011/6/2 Jeff Black jeffrey.bl...@yahoo.com: What all does merging entail? Mainly to have one struts-core instead of struts-core and xwork-core - but we still discussing the best option. Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
Re: Unit test error for xwork-core in trunk
On Jun 5, 2011, at 2:37 PM, Lukasz Lenart lukasz.len...@googlemail.com wrote: one struts-core instead of struts-core and xwork-core - but we still discussing the best option. For example, should the package structure change drastically? -Dale - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
Re: Unit test error for xwork-core in trunk
2011/6/5 Dale Newfield d...@newfield.org: On Jun 5, 2011, at 2:37 PM, Lukasz Lenart lukasz.len...@googlemail.com wrote: one struts-core instead of struts-core and xwork-core - but we still discussing the best option. For example, should the package structure change drastically? Yeah, from com.opensymphony.xwork to org.apache.struts, but that's inevitable sooner or later ... Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
Re: Unit test error for xwork-core in trunk
I'm nervous about using the clean delineation between the web and non-web bits. I like that separation. Dave
Re: Unit test error for xwork-core in trunk
Thank you. I was curious if anything more than refactoring the package structure would be involved. jb / On Jun 5, 2011, at 2:09 PM, Lukasz Lenart lukasz.len...@googlemail.com wrote: 2011/6/5 Dale Newfield d...@newfield.org: On Jun 5, 2011, at 2:37 PM, Lukasz Lenart lukasz.len...@googlemail.com wrote: one struts-core instead of struts-core and xwork-core - but we still discussing the best option. For example, should the package structure change drastically? Yeah, from com.opensymphony.xwork to org.apache.struts, but that's inevitable sooner or later ... Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
Re: Unit test error for xwork-core in trunk
On Jun 5, 2011, at 3:09 PM, Lukasz Lenart lukasz.len...@googlemail.com wrote: package structure change drastically? Yeah, from com.opensymphony.xwork to org.apache.struts, but that's inevitable sooner or later ... That's a name change but if a 1-1 mapping still not really a structural change. My question is if stuff should be folded together even more, and touches on Dave's question of how to do that w/o losing the non-web users of xwork to a fork of old code. Should we still produce two jars, one struts(w/xwork) and a another a subset xwork (w/o struts)? -Dale - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
Re: Unit test error for xwork-core in trunk
I assume you meant losing instead of using? -Dale On Jun 5, 2011, at 3:17 PM, Dave Newton davelnew...@gmail.com wrote: I'm nervous about using the clean delineation between the web and non-web bits. I like that separation. Dave - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
Re: Unit test error for xwork-core in trunk
Perhaps migrate the package structure to org.apache.struts.xwork and keep it as a separate jar for now to accomodate the non-web users. Then if we opt to merge it in the future it will already have the uniform package structure and still be semi-partitioned in the xwork sub-package. On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Dale Newfield d...@newfield.org wrote: I assume you meant losing instead of using? -Dale On Jun 5, 2011, at 3:17 PM, Dave Newton davelnew...@gmail.com wrote: I'm nervous about using the clean delineation between the web and non-web bits. I like that separation. Dave - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
Re: Unit test error for xwork-core in trunk
What all does merging entail? jb / From: Dave Newton davelnew...@gmail.com To: Struts Developers List dev@struts.apache.org; lukasz.len...@gmail.com Sent: Wednesday, June 1, 2011 6:20 PM Subject: Re: Unit test error for xwork-core in trunk +1, but we've been saying that for awhile ;) Not sure what the best way to do it is, though. I doubt anybody is tracking our XW core anymore, although at one point there were people using just XW. And I like the idea of keeping the core command stuff separate from the web-related stuff. Dave On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Lukasz Lenart lukasz.len...@googlemail.com wrote: 2011/6/1 Maurizio Cucchiara maurizio.cucchi...@gmail.com: As we noticed, the opensymphony webiste has been shutdown, so the dtd is no longer reachable. So I think it's the time to merge XWork into Struts2 Core, WDYT? Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
Re: Unit test error for xwork-core in trunk
As we noticed, the opensymphony webiste has been shutdown, so the dtd is no longer reachable. On 1 June 2011 07:15, Lukasz Lenart lukasz.len...@googlemail.com wrote: 2011/6/1 John Lindal lind...@yahoo-inc.com: I get “Wrong line number: http://www.opensymphony.com/xwork/xwork-validator-config-1.0.dtd:1:2” from com.opensymphony.xwork2.validator.DefaultValidatorFileParserTest.testParserWithBadXML2() Are you behind a firewall ? I had got such problem when I had been trying to build Struts2 on my PC at work. Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org -- Maurizio Cucchiara - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
Re: Unit test error for xwork-core in trunk
2011/6/1 Maurizio Cucchiara maurizio.cucchi...@gmail.com: As we noticed, the opensymphony webiste has been shutdown, so the dtd is no longer reachable. So I think it's the time to merge XWork into Struts2 Core, WDYT? Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
Re: Unit test error for xwork-core in trunk
+1 definitely Maurizio Cucchiara Il giorno 01/giu/2011 20.47, Lukasz Lenart lukasz.len...@googlemail.com ha scritto: 2011/6/1 Maurizio Cucchiara maurizio.cucchi...@gmail.com: As we noticed, the opensymphony webiste has been shutdown, so the dtd is no longer reachable. So I think it's the time to merge XWork into Struts2 Core, WDYT? Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura ...
Re: Unit test error for xwork-core in trunk
+1 John On 6/1/11 11:50 AM, Maurizio Cucchiara maurizio.cucchi...@gmail.com wrote: +1 definitely Maurizio Cucchiara Il giorno 01/giu/2011 20.47, Lukasz Lenart lukasz.len...@googlemail.com ha scritto: 2011/6/1 Maurizio Cucchiara maurizio.cucchi...@gmail.com: As we noticed, the opensymphony webiste has been shutdown, so the dtd is no longer reachable. So I think it's the time to merge XWork into Struts2 Core, WDYT? Regards - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
RE: Unit test error for xwork-core in trunk
+1 Jason Pyeron -Original Message- From: John Lindal [mailto:lind...@yahoo-inc.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2011 14:54 To: Struts Developers List Subject: Re: Unit test error for xwork-core in trunk +1 John On 6/1/11 11:50 AM, Maurizio Cucchiara maurizio.cucchi...@gmail.com wrote: +1 definitely Maurizio Cucchiara Il giorno 01/giu/2011 20.47, Lukasz Lenart lukasz.len...@googlemail.com ha scritto: 2011/6/1 Maurizio Cucchiara maurizio.cucchi...@gmail.com: As we noticed, the opensymphony webiste has been shutdown, so the dtd is no longer reachable. So I think it's the time to merge XWork into Struts2 Core, WDYT? Regards - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- - - - Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us - - Principal Consultant 10 West 24th Street #100- - +1 (443) 269-1555 x333Baltimore, Maryland 21218 - - - -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- This message is copyright PD Inc, subject to license 20080407P00. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
RE: Unit test error for xwork-core in trunk
+1 Johannes - -- web: http://www.jgeppert.com twitter: http://twitter.com/jogep -- View this message in context: http://struts.1045723.n5.nabble.com/Unit-test-error-for-xwork-core-in-trunk-tp4443743p4446228.html Sent from the Struts - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
Re: Unit test error for xwork-core in trunk
+1 for merging On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Johannes Geppert jo...@apache.org wrote: +1 Johannes - -- web: http://www.jgeppert.com twitter: http://twitter.com/jogep -- View this message in context: http://struts.1045723.n5.nabble.com/Unit-test-error-for-xwork-core-in-trunk-tp4443743p4446228.html Sent from the Struts - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
Re: Unit test error for xwork-core in trunk
+1, but we've been saying that for awhile ;) Not sure what the best way to do it is, though. I doubt anybody is tracking our XW core anymore, although at one point there were people using just XW. And I like the idea of keeping the core command stuff separate from the web-related stuff. Dave On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Lukasz Lenart lukasz.len...@googlemail.com wrote: 2011/6/1 Maurizio Cucchiara maurizio.cucchi...@gmail.com: As we noticed, the opensymphony webiste has been shutdown, so the dtd is no longer reachable. So I think it's the time to merge XWork into Struts2 Core, WDYT? Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
Re: Unit test error for xwork-core in trunk
We should seriously consider to relocate the opensymphony dtds in the meanwhile. I make you note that the first messages are starting to appear in the user ml. WDYT? -- Maurizio Cucchiara Il giorno 02/giu/2011 01.20, Dave Newton davelnew...@gmail.com ha scritto: +1, but we've been saying that for awhile ;) Not sure what the best way to do it is, though. I doubt anybody is tracking our XW core anymore, although at one point there were people using just XW. And I like the idea of keeping the core command stuff separate from the web-related stuff. Dave On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Lukasz Lenart lukasz.len...@googlemail.com wrote: 2011/6/1 Maurizio Cucchiara maurizio.cucchi...@gmail.com: As we noticed, the opensymphony web...
Re: Unit test error for xwork-core in trunk
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 9:27 PM, Maurizio Cucchiara wrote: [...] relocate the opensymphony dtds in the meanwhile [...] Relo and announce, sure. An Atlassian guy shows up in the whois, should we reach out? Dave - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
Re: Unit test error for xwork-core in trunk
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 6:41 PM, Dave Newton davelnew...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 9:27 PM, Maurizio Cucchiara wrote: [...] relocate the opensymphony dtds in the meanwhile [...] Relo and announce, sure. An Atlassian guy shows up in the whois, should we reach out? To Mike? Sure, why not. Also to Patrick (emeritus Struts guy). -- Martin Cooper Dave - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
Unit test error for xwork-core in trunk
I get “Wrong line number: http://www.opensymphony.com/xwork/xwork-validator-config-1.0.dtd:1:2” from com.opensymphony.xwork2.validator.DefaultValidatorFileParserTest.testParserWithBadXML2() I’m using Maven 2, but I can’t see how that would affect the unit tests. Is anybody else getting this unit test error? Thanks, John
RE: Unit test error for xwork-core in trunk
\src\xwork-core\src\main\resources\xwork-validator-config-1.0.dtd ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8? !-- XWork Validator Config DTD. Used the following DOCTYPE. !DOCTYPE validators PUBLIC -//OpenSymphony Group//XWork Validator Config 1.0//EN http://www.opensymphony.com/xwork/xwork-validator-config-1.0.dtd; -- !ELEMENT validators (validator)+ !ELEMENT validator (#PCDATA) !ATTLIST validator name CDATA #REQUIRED class CDATA #REQUIRED is valid dtd when tested at http://www.validome.org/grammar/validate/ do you have the same DTD? Martin Gainty __ Verzicht und Vertraulichkeitanmerkung/Note de déni et de confidentialité Diese Nachricht ist vertraulich. Sollten Sie nicht der vorgesehene Empfaenger sein, so bitten wir hoeflich um eine Mitteilung. Jede unbefugte Weiterleitung oder Fertigung einer Kopie ist unzulaessig. Diese Nachricht dient lediglich dem Austausch von Informationen und entfaltet keine rechtliche Bindungswirkung. Aufgrund der leichten Manipulierbarkeit von E-Mails koennen wir keine Haftung fuer den Inhalt uebernehmen. Ce message est confidentiel et peut être privilégié. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire prévu, nous te demandons avec bonté que pour satisfaire informez l'expéditeur. N'importe quelle diffusion non autorisée ou la copie de ceci est interdite. Ce message sert à l'information seulement et n'aura pas n'importe quel effet légalement obligatoire. Étant donné que les email peuvent facilement être sujets à la manipulation, nous ne pouvons accepter aucune responsabilité pour le contenu fourni. From: lind...@yahoo-inc.com To: dev@struts.apache.org Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 17:27:02 -0700 Subject: Unit test error for xwork-core in trunk I get “Wrong line number: http://www.opensymphony.com/xwork/xwork-validator-config-1.0.dtd:1:2” from com.opensymphony.xwork2.validator.DefaultValidatorFileParserTest.testParserWithBadXML2() I’m using Maven 2, but I can’t see how that would affect the unit tests. Is anybody else getting this unit test error? Thanks, John
Re: Unit test error for xwork-core in trunk
2011/6/1 John Lindal lind...@yahoo-inc.com: I get “Wrong line number: http://www.opensymphony.com/xwork/xwork-validator-config-1.0.dtd:1:2” from com.opensymphony.xwork2.validator.DefaultValidatorFileParserTest.testParserWithBadXML2() Are you behind a firewall ? I had got such problem when I had been trying to build Struts2 on my PC at work. Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
