Re: [dev] libsecret implementation
Hi, > ... If it's not, and you don't have a say in the matter, > then there's obviously nothing you can do about it, no? Yes it's a piece of software we have to use. This piece has gnome keyring as their dependency. My hope was to define another implementation like https://github.com/grawity/secretsd maybe I will give secretsd a try. thx > [1]: https://9fans.github.io/plan9port/man/man4/factotum.html uh. this sounds awesome. I know too less about plan9. :) marko
Re: [dev] libsecret implementation
>D-Bus is bloat in itself and should be avoided if possible, just like related >bloatware such as systemd. > >[1]: https://github.com/grawity/secretsd +1 I've yet to see a good reason to use dbus.
Re: [dev] libsecret implementation
On 23/10/10 01:04PM, Страхиња Радић wrote: > It all depends on the degree of your agency over the choice of software and > over the software itself. If it's a program you wrote, then consider > switching > away from D-Bus to interfacing with a simpler/better/more traditional > solution, > like pass or factotum[1]. If it's not, and you don't have a say in the > matter, > then there's obviously nothing you can do about it, no? > [1]: https://9fans.github.io/plan9port/man/man4/factotum.html That said, a simple web search (LMGTFY...) for "libsecret implementation" reveals one such implementation[1] among the first results. Whether it is "endorsed" by suckless movement is another matter. As a suckless _fan_, I'd say D-Bus is bloat in itself and should be avoided if possible, just like related bloatware such as systemd. [1]: https://github.com/grawity/secretsd signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [dev] libsecret implementation
On 23/10/10 10:33AM, Marko Bauhardt wrote: > Hi, > i have to use a program at work which requires libsecret - Secret > Service D-Bus client library. > Right now I'm using the gnome keyring implementation. > I would like to get rid of this implementation and use a more simpler > one, in other words without gnome/kde deps. It all depends on the degree of your agency over the choice of software and over the software itself. If it's a program you wrote, then consider switching away from D-Bus to interfacing with a simpler/better/more traditional solution, like pass or factotum[1]. If it's not, and you don't have a say in the matter, then there's obviously nothing you can do about it, no? [1]: https://9fans.github.io/plan9port/man/man4/factotum.html signature.asc Description: PGP signature
[dev] libsecret implementation
Hi, i have to use a program at work which requires libsecret - Secret Service D-Bus client library. Right now I'm using the gnome keyring implementation. I would like to get rid of this implementation and use a more simpler one, in other words without gnome/kde deps. Do you know any suckless alternative which implements libsecret? Or any workaround... Best would be to use something like pass thx marko
