Re: BasicAuth realm String
On 27/02/13 14:27, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: Hi Sergey, I guess using the name of the framework might be problematic when using Syncope within some custom deployments; I'd vote for getting the realm name customized via a property, and defaulted to a more neutral name as suggested (say Identity Provision or Management, etc) or may be just omitted during the challenge by default, I will just change it to Apache Syncope authentication for now. Thinking more about it, this is probably the best default option indeed, you are all right :-) Cheers, Sergey The ability to make it customisable via a property seems reasonable, could log a JIRA for it? Colm. On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 2:14 AM, Sergey Beryozkinsberyoz...@gmail.comwrote: Hi On 27/02/13 07:49, Francesco Chicchiriccň wrote: On 26/02/2013 23:03, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: Hi all, The core's RestServiceExceptionMapper defines the following: private static final String BASIC_REALM_UNAUTHORIZED = Basic realm=\Spring Security Application\; I propose to change this to a more neutral realm, as this appears when authenticating to access the new CXF-based REST API as well. +1 Any objections or suggestions? What about Apache Syncope authentication? I guess using the name of the framework might be problematic when using Syncope within some custom deployments; I'd vote for getting the realm name customized via a property, and defaulted to a more neutral name as suggested (say Identity Provision or Management, etc) or may be just omitted during the challenge by default, Thanks, Sergey Regards.
Re: BasicAuth realm String
Hi On 27/02/13 07:49, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote: On 26/02/2013 23:03, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: Hi all, The core's RestServiceExceptionMapper defines the following: private static final String BASIC_REALM_UNAUTHORIZED = Basic realm=\Spring Security Application\; I propose to change this to a more neutral realm, as this appears when authenticating to access the new CXF-based REST API as well. +1 Any objections or suggestions? What about Apache Syncope authentication? I guess using the name of the framework might be problematic when using Syncope within some custom deployments; I'd vote for getting the realm name customized via a property, and defaulted to a more neutral name as suggested (say Identity Provision or Management, etc) or may be just omitted during the challenge by default, Thanks, Sergey Regards.
Re: BasicAuth realm String
Hi Sergey, I guess using the name of the framework might be problematic when using Syncope within some custom deployments; I'd vote for getting the realm name customized via a property, and defaulted to a more neutral name as suggested (say Identity Provision or Management, etc) or may be just omitted during the challenge by default, I will just change it to Apache Syncope authentication for now. The ability to make it customisable via a property seems reasonable, could log a JIRA for it? Colm. On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 2:14 AM, Sergey Beryozkin sberyoz...@gmail.comwrote: Hi On 27/02/13 07:49, Francesco Chicchiriccň wrote: On 26/02/2013 23:03, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: Hi all, The core's RestServiceExceptionMapper defines the following: private static final String BASIC_REALM_UNAUTHORIZED = Basic realm=\Spring Security Application\; I propose to change this to a more neutral realm, as this appears when authenticating to access the new CXF-based REST API as well. +1 Any objections or suggestions? What about Apache Syncope authentication? I guess using the name of the framework might be problematic when using Syncope within some custom deployments; I'd vote for getting the realm name customized via a property, and defaulted to a more neutral name as suggested (say Identity Provision or Management, etc) or may be just omitted during the challenge by default, Thanks, Sergey Regards. -- Colm O hEigeartaigh Talend Community Coder http://coders.talend.com
Re: BasicAuth realm String
On 26/02/2013 23:03, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: Hi all, The core's RestServiceExceptionMapper defines the following: private static final String BASIC_REALM_UNAUTHORIZED = Basic realm=\Spring Security Application\; I propose to change this to a more neutral realm, as this appears when authenticating to access the new CXF-based REST API as well. +1 Any objections or suggestions? What about Apache Syncope authentication? Regards. -- Francesco Chicchiriccò ASF Member, Apache Syncope PMC chair, Apache Cocoon PMC Member http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/
