Re: Velocity truth
Looks sound, nothing to complain here. Am 2017-02-07 um 02:42 schrieb Claude Brisson: Another try: 1) return false for a null object 2) return its value for a Boolean object, or the result of the getAsBoolean() method if it exists. 3) If directive.if.emptycheck = false (true by default), stop here and return true. 4) check for emptiness: - return whether an array is empty. - return whether isEmpty() is false (covers String and all Collection classes). - return whether length() is zero (covers CharSequence classes other than String). - returns whether size() is zero. - return whether a Number *strictly* equals zero. 5) check for emptiness after explicit conversion methods: - return whether the result of getAsString() is empty (and false for a null result) if it exists. - return whether the result of getAsNumber() *strictly* equals zero (and false for a null result) if it exists. About toString(), I agree that we could simply drop it along with its configuration setting: we're talking about non-basic objects, which don't have any size() or length() or isEmpty() method, and whose toString() method could still return null or the empty string. Pretty rare, I guess. And for such an object, the user may only want to check whether it's null or not when he writes #if($foo). We will also clearly state in the docs that checking for null can be done with #if($foo == $null), for false with #if($foo == false), and for empty string with #if("$!foo" == ""). Claude On 06/02/2017 19:55, Michael Osipov wrote: Am 2017-02-06 um 19:45 schrieb Nathan Bubna: On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 10:32 AM, Michael Osipovwrote: Am 2017-02-06 um 19:23 schrieb Nathan Bubna: On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 9:43 AM, Michael Osipov wrote: 7) check object for a length() or size() method, if so return whether it returns 0, but I agree with Alex Fedotov that we could skip those methods if we already took care for strings and collections. What happened to array#length? You completely missed that out. I would not drop #length() and #size(), you'd ultimately fail with javax.naming.directory.Attribute#size() or javax.naming.directory.Attributes#size(). There are likely more examples to have this. i don't think it hurts to keep them, most users won't often get that far, i think. I did not say we should drop them, I said that they are crucial in some situations. Dropping them would be wrong. Yup. I was agreeing. :) 8) If directive.if.tostring.check = false, stop here and return true (*) 9) check object for a toString() method, and return whether the string is non-null and non-empty The 6th step won't be reached very often... (*) the old configuration parameter was directive.if.tostring.nullchec k, but for consistency with the new behavior regarding empty strings, my proposal is to rename it like this. I don't consider that backward compatibility is important since all collections are handled above in the chain. 9) is somewhat confusing because #toString() is never null unless you override it and return a custom string. Moreover, how will a #toString() guarantee you that an object is logically empty? It can't, see javax.naming.directory.SearchResult#getAttributes(). At best, this would be false by default in 2.0. ... I still back this check. Velocity is for templating, text output, i.e. a display language. Velocity-specific classes (including some VelocityTools) have had cause in the past to return null or empty strings specifically because of this check and that toString() is regularly central to rendering objects. While it cannot guarantee emptiness for every object out there, it is a sensible check. The goal here is not perfection, but to catch common cases, and due to history, i believe this is a common one. Again, there might be cases this is necessary though I cannot make up one from the top of my head. I am just saying that this should not be a default setting and people must know what they enable at the end. My concern was backward compatibility, which, while not necessary, is still quite valuable. There are existing VelocityTools that rely on this, after all. Given all the ways to avoid getting to this check, i don't see the compelling reason to toggle the default here. Though, as always, i will defer to those doing actual work right now. :) Just chiming in with my two bits. This is a new major release (!) for a for period of time, approaches chang, so should software. We shall take the freedom and do the right step forward. After all, people don't like surprises if the world keeps revolving and you don't move with it. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@velocity.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@velocity.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Re: Velocity truth
Another try: 1) return false for a null object 2) return its value for a Boolean object, or the result of the getAsBoolean() method if it exists. 3) If directive.if.emptycheck = false (true by default), stop here and return true. 4) check for emptiness: - return whether an array is empty. - return whether isEmpty() is false (covers String and all Collection classes). - return whether length() is zero (covers CharSequence classes other than String). - returns whether size() is zero. - return whether a Number *strictly* equals zero. 5) check for emptiness after explicit conversion methods: - return whether the result of getAsString() is empty (and false for a null result) if it exists. - return whether the result of getAsNumber() *strictly* equals zero (and false for a null result) if it exists. About toString(), I agree that we could simply drop it along with its configuration setting: we're talking about non-basic objects, which don't have any size() or length() or isEmpty() method, and whose toString() method could still return null or the empty string. Pretty rare, I guess. And for such an object, the user may only want to check whether it's null or not when he writes #if($foo). We will also clearly state in the docs that checking for null can be done with #if($foo == $null), for false with #if($foo == false), and for empty string with #if("$!foo" == ""). Claude On 06/02/2017 19:55, Michael Osipov wrote: Am 2017-02-06 um 19:45 schrieb Nathan Bubna: On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 10:32 AM, Michael Osipovwrote: Am 2017-02-06 um 19:23 schrieb Nathan Bubna: On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 9:43 AM, Michael Osipov wrote: 7) check object for a length() or size() method, if so return whether it returns 0, but I agree with Alex Fedotov that we could skip those methods if we already took care for strings and collections. What happened to array#length? You completely missed that out. I would not drop #length() and #size(), you'd ultimately fail with javax.naming.directory.Attribute#size() or javax.naming.directory.Attributes#size(). There are likely more examples to have this. i don't think it hurts to keep them, most users won't often get that far, i think. I did not say we should drop them, I said that they are crucial in some situations. Dropping them would be wrong. Yup. I was agreeing. :) 8) If directive.if.tostring.check = false, stop here and return true (*) 9) check object for a toString() method, and return whether the string is non-null and non-empty The 6th step won't be reached very often... (*) the old configuration parameter was directive.if.tostring.nullchec k, but for consistency with the new behavior regarding empty strings, my proposal is to rename it like this. I don't consider that backward compatibility is important since all collections are handled above in the chain. 9) is somewhat confusing because #toString() is never null unless you override it and return a custom string. Moreover, how will a #toString() guarantee you that an object is logically empty? It can't, see javax.naming.directory.SearchResult#getAttributes(). At best, this would be false by default in 2.0. ... I still back this check. Velocity is for templating, text output, i.e. a display language. Velocity-specific classes (including some VelocityTools) have had cause in the past to return null or empty strings specifically because of this check and that toString() is regularly central to rendering objects. While it cannot guarantee emptiness for every object out there, it is a sensible check. The goal here is not perfection, but to catch common cases, and due to history, i believe this is a common one. Again, there might be cases this is necessary though I cannot make up one from the top of my head. I am just saying that this should not be a default setting and people must know what they enable at the end. My concern was backward compatibility, which, while not necessary, is still quite valuable. There are existing VelocityTools that rely on this, after all. Given all the ways to avoid getting to this check, i don't see the compelling reason to toggle the default here. Though, as always, i will defer to those doing actual work right now. :) Just chiming in with my two bits. This is a new major release (!) for a for period of time, approaches chang, so should software. We shall take the freedom and do the right step forward. After all, people don't like surprises if the world keeps revolving and you don't move with it. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@velocity.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@velocity.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@velocity.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:
Re: Velocity truth
Am 2017-02-06 um 19:45 schrieb Nathan Bubna: On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 10:32 AM, Michael Osipovwrote: Am 2017-02-06 um 19:23 schrieb Nathan Bubna: On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 9:43 AM, Michael Osipov wrote: 7) check object for a length() or size() method, if so return whether it returns 0, but I agree with Alex Fedotov that we could skip those methods if we already took care for strings and collections. What happened to array#length? You completely missed that out. I would not drop #length() and #size(), you'd ultimately fail with javax.naming.directory.Attribute#size() or javax.naming.directory.Attributes#size(). There are likely more examples to have this. i don't think it hurts to keep them, most users won't often get that far, i think. I did not say we should drop them, I said that they are crucial in some situations. Dropping them would be wrong. Yup. I was agreeing. :) 8) If directive.if.tostring.check = false, stop here and return true (*) 9) check object for a toString() method, and return whether the string is non-null and non-empty The 6th step won't be reached very often... (*) the old configuration parameter was directive.if.tostring.nullchec k, but for consistency with the new behavior regarding empty strings, my proposal is to rename it like this. I don't consider that backward compatibility is important since all collections are handled above in the chain. 9) is somewhat confusing because #toString() is never null unless you override it and return a custom string. Moreover, how will a #toString() guarantee you that an object is logically empty? It can't, see javax.naming.directory.SearchResult#getAttributes(). At best, this would be false by default in 2.0. ... I still back this check. Velocity is for templating, text output, i.e. a display language. Velocity-specific classes (including some VelocityTools) have had cause in the past to return null or empty strings specifically because of this check and that toString() is regularly central to rendering objects. While it cannot guarantee emptiness for every object out there, it is a sensible check. The goal here is not perfection, but to catch common cases, and due to history, i believe this is a common one. Again, there might be cases this is necessary though I cannot make up one from the top of my head. I am just saying that this should not be a default setting and people must know what they enable at the end. My concern was backward compatibility, which, while not necessary, is still quite valuable. There are existing VelocityTools that rely on this, after all. Given all the ways to avoid getting to this check, i don't see the compelling reason to toggle the default here. Though, as always, i will defer to those doing actual work right now. :) Just chiming in with my two bits. This is a new major release (!) for a for period of time, approaches chang, so should software. We shall take the freedom and do the right step forward. After all, people don't like surprises if the world keeps revolving and you don't move with it. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@velocity.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@velocity.apache.org
Re: Velocity truth
On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 10:32 AM, Michael Osipovwrote: > Am 2017-02-06 um 19:23 schrieb Nathan Bubna: > >> On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 9:43 AM, Michael Osipov >> wrote: >> >>> 7) check object for a length() or size() method, if so return whether it >>> returns 0, but I agree with Alex Fedotov that we could skip those methods if we already took care for strings and collections. >>> What happened to array#length? You completely missed that out. >>> I would not drop #length() and #size(), you'd ultimately fail with >>> javax.naming.directory.Attribute#size() or >>> javax.naming.directory.Attributes#size(). >>> There are likely more examples to have this. >>> >> >> >> i don't think it hurts to keep them, most users won't often get that far, >> i >> think. >> > > I did not say we should drop them, I said that they are crucial in some > situations. Dropping them would be wrong. Yup. I was agreeing. :) > 8) If directive.if.tostring.check = false, stop here and return true (*) >> >>> 9) check object for a toString() method, and return whether the string is non-null and non-empty The 6th step won't be reached very often... (*) the old configuration parameter was directive.if.tostring.nullchec k, but for consistency with the new behavior regarding empty strings, my proposal is to rename it like this. I don't consider that backward compatibility is important since all collections are handled above in the chain. >>> 9) is somewhat confusing because #toString() is never null unless you >>> override it and return a custom string. Moreover, how will a #toString() >>> guarantee you that an object is logically empty? It can't, see >>> javax.naming.directory.SearchResult#getAttributes(). >>> >>> At best, this would be false by default in 2.0. >>> >> >> ... >> >> I still back this check. Velocity is for templating, text output, i.e. a >> display language. Velocity-specific classes (including some VelocityTools) >> have had cause in the past to return null or empty strings specifically >> because of this check and that toString() is regularly central to >> rendering >> objects. While it cannot guarantee emptiness for every object out there, >> it >> is a sensible check. The goal here is not perfection, but to catch common >> cases, and due to history, i believe this is a common one. >> > > Again, there might be cases this is necessary though I cannot make up one > from the top of my head. I am just saying that this should not be a default > setting and people must know what they enable at the end. My concern was backward compatibility, which, while not necessary, is still quite valuable. There are existing VelocityTools that rely on this, after all. Given all the ways to avoid getting to this check, i don't see the compelling reason to toggle the default here. Though, as always, i will defer to those doing actual work right now. :) Just chiming in with my two bits.
Re: Velocity truth
Am 2017-02-06 um 19:23 schrieb Nathan Bubna: On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 9:43 AM, Michael Osipovwrote: 7) check object for a length() or size() method, if so return whether it returns 0, but I agree with Alex Fedotov that we could skip those methods if we already took care for strings and collections. What happened to array#length? You completely missed that out. I would not drop #length() and #size(), you'd ultimately fail with javax.naming.directory.Attribute#size() or javax.naming.directory.Attributes#size(). There are likely more examples to have this. i don't think it hurts to keep them, most users won't often get that far, i think. I did not say we should drop them, I said that they are crucial in some situations. Dropping them would be wrong. 8) If directive.if.tostring.check = false, stop here and return true (*) 9) check object for a toString() method, and return whether the string is non-null and non-empty The 6th step won't be reached very often... (*) the old configuration parameter was directive.if.tostring.nullcheck, but for consistency with the new behavior regarding empty strings, my proposal is to rename it like this. I don't consider that backward compatibility is important since all collections are handled above in the chain. 9) is somewhat confusing because #toString() is never null unless you override it and return a custom string. Moreover, how will a #toString() guarantee you that an object is logically empty? It can't, see javax.naming.directory.SearchResult#getAttributes(). At best, this would be false by default in 2.0. ... I still back this check. Velocity is for templating, text output, i.e. a display language. Velocity-specific classes (including some VelocityTools) have had cause in the past to return null or empty strings specifically because of this check and that toString() is regularly central to rendering objects. While it cannot guarantee emptiness for every object out there, it is a sensible check. The goal here is not perfection, but to catch common cases, and due to history, i believe this is a common one. Again, there might be cases this is necessary though I cannot make up one from the top of my head. I am just saying that this should not be a default setting and people must know what they enable at the end. Michael - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@velocity.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@velocity.apache.org
Re: Velocity truth
Hi Claude, Am 2017-02-06 um 17:55 schrieb Claude Brisson: Hi Christopher. The spec has evolved quite a bit since then: the course I've taken is this one (and remarks are welcome): 4) check for empty objects by class: - return whether the collection is empty for a Collection object 5) check object for an isEmpty() method, if so return whether it returned false Why explicitly check for collection if you do #isEmpty()? I'd either add Map to the explicit check or drop collection altogether and rely on #isEmpty() solely. 7) check object for a length() or size() method, if so return whether it returns 0, but I agree with Alex Fedotov that we could skip those methods if we already took care for strings and collections. What happened to array#length? You completely missed that out. I would not drop #length() and #size(), you'd ultimately fail with javax.naming.directory.Attribute#size() or javax.naming.directory.Attributes#size(). There are likely more examples to have this. 8) If directive.if.tostring.check = false, stop here and return true (*) 9) check object for a toString() method, and return whether the string is non-null and non-empty The 6th step won't be reached very often... (*) the old configuration parameter was directive.if.tostring.nullcheck, but for consistency with the new behavior regarding empty strings, my proposal is to rename it like this. I don't consider that backward compatibility is important since all collections are handled above in the chain. 9) is somewhat confusing because #toString() is never null unless you override it and return a custom string. Moreover, how will a #toString() guarantee you that an object is logically empty? It can't, see javax.naming.directory.SearchResult#getAttributes(). At best, this would be false by default in 2.0. Michael On 06/02/2017 16:48, Christopher Schultz wrote: Claude, On 1/28/17 10:15 AM, Claude Brisson wrote: Here's what had been specified by Nathan at the time (order is meaningful, and falseness seems easier to specify than truth): $obj is null $obj is boolean false $obj returns false from getAsBoolean() (provided there is such a method) $obj is empty string (CharSequence w/length 0) $obj returns true from isEmpty() (provided there is such a method) $obj is array of length 0 $obj returns null from getAsString() (provided there is such a method) $obj returns empty string from getAsString() (provided there is such a method) $obj returns null from getAsNumber() (provided there is such a method) $obj returns 0 from length() or size() (provided there is such a method) $obj returns empty string from toString() (provided there is such a method) I *hate* that last one. A great use-case that ran us into OOMEs for a while until I figured out what was going on: 1. SELECT [fields] FROM table 2. Build ArrayList with e.g. User objects 3. Build a user list in HTML from a Velocity template like this: #if($users) #foreach($user in $users) ... #end #else No users found :() #end This gives me horrible performance and an OOME when the list gets too long, because the check for #if($users) truthiness converts the whole list collection into a String (which takes forever) which can be huge (which can cause OOME). I have now set the "directive.if.tostring.nullcheck=false" configuration property (and written a set of wrapper classes around Collection classes that throws an exception when toString is called, so things fail in development) to avoid this, but also taken to using this check instead: #if($users.size() > 0) But this gets me a warning about the "size" method not existing on a null object when the list is null. So I get junk in my logs when I do things the hacky-way and I get performance problems and OOMEs when I do things the "correct" way (at least, it looks totally correct). Regarding this spec: - I'm not sure about getAsString() ; toString() is usually the standard way of getting the String representation and should be enough. - I'm not convinced by the fact that zero should be true. I hear Nathan's point that for a display language, zero is as legitimate as any other number to be displayed. But it breaks the principle of least surprise, since each and every other language around, when not forbidding number towards boolean implicit conversion, consider zero as false. So I'd rather go with: $obj is null $obj is Boolean false $obj is Number zero (whatever Number variant) For floating point values, does this have to be *zero*, or just close enough to zero? $obj returns false from getAsBoolean() (provided there is such a method) $obj is empty string (CharSequence w/length 0) $obj returns true from isEmpty() (provided there is such a method) $obj is array of length 0 $obj returns null from getAsNumber() (provided there is such a method) $obj returns 0 from length() or size() (provided there is such a method) $obj returns empty string from toString() (provided there is such a
Re: Velocity truth
Hi Christopher. The spec has evolved quite a bit since then: the course I've taken is this one (and remarks are welcome): 1) return false for a null object 2) return its value for a Boolean object, or the result of the getAsBoolean() method if it exists. 3) If directive.if.emptycheck = false, stop here and return true. 4) check for empty objects by class: - return whether the number *strictly* equals zero for a Number object - return whether the string is empty for a CharSequence object - return whether the collection is empty for a Collection object 5) check object for an isEmpty() method, if so return whether it returned false 6) check object for explicit conversion methods: - return the result of getAsBoolean() (and false for a null result) if it exists - return whether the result of getAsNumber() *strictly* equals zero (and false for a null result) if it exists - return whether the result of getAsString() is empty (and false for a null result) if it exists 7) check object for a length() or size() method, if so return whether it returns 0, but I agree with Alex Fedotov that we could skip those methods if we already took care for strings and collections. 8) If directive.if.tostring.check = false, stop here and return true (*) 9) check object for a toString() method, and return whether the string is non-null and non-empty The 6th step won't be reached very often... (*) the old configuration parameter was directive.if.tostring.nullcheck, but for consistency with the new behavior regarding empty strings, my proposal is to rename it like this. I don't consider that backward compatibility is important since all collections are handled above in the chain. Claude On 06/02/2017 16:48, Christopher Schultz wrote: Claude, On 1/28/17 10:15 AM, Claude Brisson wrote: Here's what had been specified by Nathan at the time (order is meaningful, and falseness seems easier to specify than truth): $obj is null $obj is boolean false $obj returns false from getAsBoolean() (provided there is such a method) $obj is empty string (CharSequence w/length 0) $obj returns true from isEmpty() (provided there is such a method) $obj is array of length 0 $obj returns null from getAsString() (provided there is such a method) $obj returns empty string from getAsString() (provided there is such a method) $obj returns null from getAsNumber() (provided there is such a method) $obj returns 0 from length() or size() (provided there is such a method) $obj returns empty string from toString() (provided there is such a method) I *hate* that last one. A great use-case that ran us into OOMEs for a while until I figured out what was going on: 1. SELECT [fields] FROM table 2. Build ArrayList with e.g. User objects 3. Build a user list in HTML from a Velocity template like this: #if($users) #foreach($user in $users) ... #end #else No users found :() #end This gives me horrible performance and an OOME when the list gets too long, because the check for #if($users) truthiness converts the whole list collection into a String (which takes forever) which can be huge (which can cause OOME). I have now set the "directive.if.tostring.nullcheck=false" configuration property (and written a set of wrapper classes around Collection classes that throws an exception when toString is called, so things fail in development) to avoid this, but also taken to using this check instead: #if($users.size() > 0) But this gets me a warning about the "size" method not existing on a null object when the list is null. So I get junk in my logs when I do things the hacky-way and I get performance problems and OOMEs when I do things the "correct" way (at least, it looks totally correct). Regarding this spec: - I'm not sure about getAsString() ; toString() is usually the standard way of getting the String representation and should be enough. - I'm not convinced by the fact that zero should be true. I hear Nathan's point that for a display language, zero is as legitimate as any other number to be displayed. But it breaks the principle of least surprise, since each and every other language around, when not forbidding number towards boolean implicit conversion, consider zero as false. So I'd rather go with: $obj is null $obj is Boolean false $obj is Number zero (whatever Number variant) For floating point values, does this have to be *zero*, or just close enough to zero? $obj returns false from getAsBoolean() (provided there is such a method) $obj is empty string (CharSequence w/length 0) $obj returns true from isEmpty() (provided there is such a method) $obj is array of length 0 $obj returns null from getAsNumber() (provided there is such a method) $obj returns 0 from length() or size() (provided there is such a method) $obj returns empty string from toString() (provided there is such a method) Also, I noticed that Velocity weren't very consistent with literals. The only literal
Re: Velocity truth
On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 7:48 AM, Christopher Schultz < ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote: > Claude, ... > > $obj returns false from getAsBoolean() (provided there is such a method) > > $obj is empty string (CharSequence w/length 0) > > $obj returns true from isEmpty() (provided there is such a method) > > $obj is array of length 0 > > $obj returns null from getAsNumber() (provided there is such a method) > > $obj returns 0 from length() or size() (provided there is such a method) > > $obj returns empty string from toString() (provided there is such a > method) > > > > Also, I noticed that Velocity weren't very consistent with literals. The > > only literal returning true is the 'true' literal. "foo" is false, > > whereas it should be consistent with $foo containing "foo". > > Can we maybe make an exception for Collections? Maybe for a Collection > (or array), we never call toString() on it? [].toString will always give > you garbage (which will be truthy) and Collection.toString() will also > likely give you garbage and it will also always be truthy unless it's > (a) null or (b) the Collection implements toString in a surprising way > relative to java.util Collections. > ... Yeah, one of the crucial ideas here is that Velocity would stop checking as soon as it found one of these. So no Array, CharSequence, or Collection would ever make it down the lookup chain to toString(). The goal is to be more type/function aware specifically to avoid getting down to the toString(), but still leaving that toString() check for better backward compatibility.
Re: Velocity truth
I would try to something similar to Javascript convention https://javascriptweblog.wordpress.com/2011/02/07/truth-equality-and-javascript/ substituting CharSequence instead of String (so that other empty String like objects i.e. StringBuilder would evaluate as false) and also treating empty arrays and collections as "false". Not sure if Duck typing for methods like isEmpty(), length() or size() is really necessary, could just support BooleanSupplier interface for custom conversions. All other cases would be covered by collections and arrays. Alex On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 10:48 AM, Christopher Schultz < ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote: > Claude, > > On 1/28/17 10:15 AM, Claude Brisson wrote: > > Here's what had been specified by Nathan at the time (order is > > meaningful, and falseness seems easier to specify than truth): > > > > $obj is null > > $obj is boolean false > > $obj returns false from getAsBoolean() (provided there is such a method) > > $obj is empty string (CharSequence w/length 0) > > $obj returns true from isEmpty() (provided there is such a method) > > $obj is array of length 0 > > $obj returns null from getAsString() (provided there is such a method) > > $obj returns empty string from getAsString() (provided there is such a > > method) > > $obj returns null from getAsNumber() (provided there is such a method) > > $obj returns 0 from length() or size() (provided there is such a method) > > $obj returns empty string from toString() (provided there is such a > method) > > I *hate* that last one. A great use-case that ran us into OOMEs for a > while until I figured out what was going on: > > 1. SELECT [fields] FROM table > 2. Build ArrayList with e.g. User objects > 3. Build a user list in HTML from a Velocity template like this: > > #if($users) > > #foreach($user in $users) > ... > #end > > #else > No users found :() > #end > > This gives me horrible performance and an OOME when the list gets too > long, because the check for #if($users) truthiness converts the whole > list collection into a String (which takes forever) which can be huge > (which can cause OOME). > > I have now set the "directive.if.tostring.nullcheck=false" configuration > property (and written a set of wrapper classes around Collection classes > that throws an exception when toString is called, so things fail in > development) to avoid this, but also taken to using this check instead: > > #if($users.size() > 0) > > But this gets me a warning about the "size" method not existing on a > null object when the list is null. So I get junk in my logs when I do > things the hacky-way and I get performance problems and OOMEs when I do > things the "correct" way (at least, it looks totally correct). > > > Regarding this spec: > > - I'm not sure about getAsString() ; toString() is usually the standard > > way of getting the String representation and should be enough. > > - I'm not convinced by the fact that zero should be true. I hear > > Nathan's point that for a display language, zero is as legitimate as any > > other number to be displayed. But it breaks the principle of least > > surprise, since each and every other language around, when not > > forbidding number towards boolean implicit conversion, consider zero as > > false. > > > > So I'd rather go with: > > > > $obj is null > > $obj is Boolean false > > $obj is Number zero (whatever Number variant) > > For floating point values, does this have to be *zero*, or just close > enough to zero? > > > $obj returns false from getAsBoolean() (provided there is such a method) > > $obj is empty string (CharSequence w/length 0) > > $obj returns true from isEmpty() (provided there is such a method) > > $obj is array of length 0 > > $obj returns null from getAsNumber() (provided there is such a method) > > $obj returns 0 from length() or size() (provided there is such a method) > > $obj returns empty string from toString() (provided there is such a > method) > > > > Also, I noticed that Velocity weren't very consistent with literals. The > > only literal returning true is the 'true' literal. "foo" is false, > > whereas it should be consistent with $foo containing "foo". > > Can we maybe make an exception for Collections? Maybe for a Collection > (or array), we never call toString() on it? [].toString will always give > you garbage (which will be truthy) and Collection.toString() will also > likely give you garbage and it will also always be truthy unless it's > (a) null or (b) the Collection implements toString in a surprising way > relative to java.util Collections. > > -chris > >
Re: Velocity truth
Claude, On 1/28/17 10:15 AM, Claude Brisson wrote: > Here's what had been specified by Nathan at the time (order is > meaningful, and falseness seems easier to specify than truth): > > $obj is null > $obj is boolean false > $obj returns false from getAsBoolean() (provided there is such a method) > $obj is empty string (CharSequence w/length 0) > $obj returns true from isEmpty() (provided there is such a method) > $obj is array of length 0 > $obj returns null from getAsString() (provided there is such a method) > $obj returns empty string from getAsString() (provided there is such a > method) > $obj returns null from getAsNumber() (provided there is such a method) > $obj returns 0 from length() or size() (provided there is such a method) > $obj returns empty string from toString() (provided there is such a method) I *hate* that last one. A great use-case that ran us into OOMEs for a while until I figured out what was going on: 1. SELECT [fields] FROM table 2. Build ArrayList with e.g. User objects 3. Build a user list in HTML from a Velocity template like this: #if($users) #foreach($user in $users) ... #end #else No users found :() #end This gives me horrible performance and an OOME when the list gets too long, because the check for #if($users) truthiness converts the whole list collection into a String (which takes forever) which can be huge (which can cause OOME). I have now set the "directive.if.tostring.nullcheck=false" configuration property (and written a set of wrapper classes around Collection classes that throws an exception when toString is called, so things fail in development) to avoid this, but also taken to using this check instead: #if($users.size() > 0) But this gets me a warning about the "size" method not existing on a null object when the list is null. So I get junk in my logs when I do things the hacky-way and I get performance problems and OOMEs when I do things the "correct" way (at least, it looks totally correct). > Regarding this spec: > - I'm not sure about getAsString() ; toString() is usually the standard > way of getting the String representation and should be enough. > - I'm not convinced by the fact that zero should be true. I hear > Nathan's point that for a display language, zero is as legitimate as any > other number to be displayed. But it breaks the principle of least > surprise, since each and every other language around, when not > forbidding number towards boolean implicit conversion, consider zero as > false. > > So I'd rather go with: > > $obj is null > $obj is Boolean false > $obj is Number zero (whatever Number variant) For floating point values, does this have to be *zero*, or just close enough to zero? > $obj returns false from getAsBoolean() (provided there is such a method) > $obj is empty string (CharSequence w/length 0) > $obj returns true from isEmpty() (provided there is such a method) > $obj is array of length 0 > $obj returns null from getAsNumber() (provided there is such a method) > $obj returns 0 from length() or size() (provided there is such a method) > $obj returns empty string from toString() (provided there is such a method) > > Also, I noticed that Velocity weren't very consistent with literals. The > only literal returning true is the 'true' literal. "foo" is false, > whereas it should be consistent with $foo containing "foo". Can we maybe make an exception for Collections? Maybe for a Collection (or array), we never call toString() on it? [].toString will always give you garbage (which will be truthy) and Collection.toString() will also likely give you garbage and it will also always be truthy unless it's (a) null or (b) the Collection implements toString in a surprising way relative to java.util Collections. -chris signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Velocity truth
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 1:33 PM, Claude Brissonwrote: > On 30/01/2017 22:08, Nathan Bubna wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 4:38 PM, Claude Brisson >> wrote: >> >> On 28/01/2017 20:23, Alex Fedotov wrote: >>> >>> You guys should definitely leave a way of disabling the toString() >>> conversion in boolean expressions. There are many places where people do null checks if #if($obj)...#end. Classes almost never return an empty string or null string from the toString call. Even worse some classes may use toString for debugging purposes and produce very long strings (including nested objects, etc.). In the code above that would be a huge inefficiency. I totally agree that a great percentage of #if($foo) statements are just >>> here to check for nulls. And the current behavior of returning false for >>> empty strings, empty arrays and empty maps could already be problematic >>> in >>> this regard >>> >>> And I think I have a good proposal about that. >>> >>> Since >>> >>> $foo differenciate null and "" (by displaying the first and not the >>> second) >>> $!foo assimilates null and "" (by hiding both) >>> >>> why not consider that: >>> >>> #if($foo) returns false for null and true for everything else, and >>> #if($!foo) returns false for null, "", zero, empty arrays, etc... >>> >>> Yikes. That looks like a scary combo of significant and subtle. It would >> need to be well-highlighted in the release notes, change logs, docs, etc. >> >> I might like it. Maybe. I dunno. The syntax is giving my tired brain >> spasms, given that it's close to the very different #if( !$foo ). I can't >> "read" it, if that make sense. It's like a complex regexp, where i have to >> think my way through it, instead of just reading it. >> >> Is there a use-case for having both supported in the same template? >> Otherwise, it might be better to avoid the subtlety and just support a >> configuration property for how clever templates can be with evaluating >> #if( >> $foo ). >> >> Maybe we do the full lookup chain by default, but let people set a >> >> directive.if.emptycheck = false >> >> That would limit it to just checking for false or null values (presumably >> still including getAsBoolean, getAsString, and toString), but skipping the >> "empty" checks. >> >> Then the high performance move is: >> >> directive.if.emptycheck = false >> directive.if.tostring.nullcheck = false >> >> But the default is for both to be true. >> >> That should be enough, yes. > > I like this syntax trick, but it remains a trick, so I won't stand for it. > Let's forget it. > > However, I wonder if we should rework the lookup chain so that it never > reaches bottom methods for standard types, collections and arrays. The > lookup chain may pretty well mix false and true checks. Like: if it's an > array, return whether or not it's empty and don't go further. Good idea. Once we find a method for checking (whether for null, false, or empty), then we should take its answer and go no further in the chain.
Re: Velocity truth
On 30/01/2017 22:08, Nathan Bubna wrote: On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 4:38 PM, Claude Brissonwrote: On 28/01/2017 20:23, Alex Fedotov wrote: You guys should definitely leave a way of disabling the toString() conversion in boolean expressions. There are many places where people do null checks if #if($obj)...#end. Classes almost never return an empty string or null string from the toString call. Even worse some classes may use toString for debugging purposes and produce very long strings (including nested objects, etc.). In the code above that would be a huge inefficiency. I totally agree that a great percentage of #if($foo) statements are just here to check for nulls. And the current behavior of returning false for empty strings, empty arrays and empty maps could already be problematic in this regard And I think I have a good proposal about that. Since $foo differenciate null and "" (by displaying the first and not the second) $!foo assimilates null and "" (by hiding both) why not consider that: #if($foo) returns false for null and true for everything else, and #if($!foo) returns false for null, "", zero, empty arrays, etc... Yikes. That looks like a scary combo of significant and subtle. It would need to be well-highlighted in the release notes, change logs, docs, etc. I might like it. Maybe. I dunno. The syntax is giving my tired brain spasms, given that it's close to the very different #if( !$foo ). I can't "read" it, if that make sense. It's like a complex regexp, where i have to think my way through it, instead of just reading it. Is there a use-case for having both supported in the same template? Otherwise, it might be better to avoid the subtlety and just support a configuration property for how clever templates can be with evaluating #if( $foo ). Maybe we do the full lookup chain by default, but let people set a directive.if.emptycheck = false That would limit it to just checking for false or null values (presumably still including getAsBoolean, getAsString, and toString), but skipping the "empty" checks. Then the high performance move is: directive.if.emptycheck = false directive.if.tostring.nullcheck = false But the default is for both to be true. That should be enough, yes. I like this syntax trick, but it remains a trick, so I won't stand for it. Let's forget it. However, I wonder if we should rework the lookup chain so that it never reaches bottom methods for standard types, collections and arrays. The lookup chain may pretty well mix false and true checks. Like: if it's an array, return whether or not it's empty and don't go further. Claude - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@velocity.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@velocity.apache.org
Re: Velocity truth (was: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Velocity Engine 2.0 RC6 test build available)
I guess I was not clear enough. This option does indeed exist in 1.7. I just wanted to make sure it does not get dropped in 2.0 as part of the cleanup work. Alex On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 4:04 PM, Nathan Bubnawrote: > On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 12:51 PM, Nathan Bubna wrote: > > > On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 11:23 AM, Alex Fedotov wrote: > > > >> You guys should definitely leave a way of disabling the toString() > >> conversion in boolean expressions. > >> > > > > Seems reasonable, and also familiar; this may have been discussed before. > > > > Oh, yes, and built. I knew this was familiar. :) > > See http://velocity.apache.org/engine/2.0/configuration.html : > > directive.if.tostring.nullcheck = true > > > > > >> There are many places where people do null checks if #if($obj)...#end. > >> > >> Classes almost never return an empty string or null string from the > >> toString call. Even worse some classes may use toString for debugging > >> purposes and produce very long strings (including nested objects, > etc.). > >> In the code above that would be a huge inefficiency. > >> > > > > Yes, that's part of the motive to have this lookup chain. If there's a > > match higher up, toString() is avoided. Big deal for maps and arrays. > > > > > >> > >> Alex > >> > >> On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 2:06 PM, Nathan Bubna wrote: > >> > >> > Shame that i can't remember anymore all my reasons for wanting those > >> > "getAs" lookups. Wondering why getAsNumber and getAsBoolean are > >> here > >> > too. Anyone else recall the use case? And assuming that i had good > >> reason > >> > (that did happen sometimes ), i wonder why i pushed for bucking > >> the > >> > "to()" convention. > >> > > >> > As for the literals, the thought of them being used in #if statements > >> in a > >> > template language is cringe-inducing. What's the use-case? Temporary > >> > debugging hacks? If so, part of me thinks maybe only 'true' should > even > >> be > >> > allowed. > >> > > >> > On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 7:15 AM, Claude Brisson > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > What is the problem? > >> > > >> > Velocity "truthiness": > >> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY-692 > >> > >>> > >> > >>> It should definitely be part of 2.0. I missed it because the issue > >> was > >> > >>> closed, we should have opened a 2.0 one to remember it. > >> > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> Thats's the problem if a closed/resolved issue does not have an > >> > >> assignee. You never know who handled it without reading the entire > >> > >> thread. A ticket should always have an assignee if code has been > >> > changed. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > Here's what had been specified by Nathan at the time (order is > >> > meaningful, > >> > > and falseness seems easier to specify than truth): > >> > > > >> > > $obj is null > >> > > $obj is boolean false > >> > > $obj returns false from getAsBoolean() (provided there is such a > >> method) > >> > > $obj is empty string (CharSequence w/length 0) > >> > > $obj returns true from isEmpty() (provided there is such a method) > >> > > $obj is array of length 0 > >> > > $obj returns null from getAsString() (provided there is such a > method) > >> > > $obj returns empty string from getAsString() (provided there is > such a > >> > > method) > >> > > $obj returns null from getAsNumber() (provided there is such a > method) > >> > > $obj returns 0 from length() or size() (provided there is such a > >> method) > >> > > $obj returns empty string from toString() (provided there is such a > >> > method) > >> > > > >> > > Regarding this spec: > >> > > - I'm not sure about getAsString() ; toString() is usually the > >> standard > >> > > way of getting the String representation and should be enough. > >> > > - I'm not convinced by the fact that zero should be true. I hear > >> > Nathan's > >> > > point that for a display language, zero is as legitimate as any > other > >> > > number to be displayed. But it breaks the principle of least > surprise, > >> > > since each and every other language around, when not forbidding > number > >> > > towards boolean implicit conversion, consider zero as false. > >> > > > >> > > So I'd rather go with: > >> > > > >> > > $obj is null > >> > > $obj is Boolean false > >> > > $obj is Number zero (whatever Number variant) > >> > > $obj returns false from getAsBoolean() (provided there is such a > >> method) > >> > > $obj is empty string (CharSequence w/length 0) > >> > > $obj returns true from isEmpty() (provided there is such a method) > >> > > $obj is array of length 0 > >> > > $obj returns null from getAsNumber() (provided there is such a > method) > >> > > $obj returns 0 from length() or size() (provided there is such a > >> method) > >> > > $obj returns empty string from toString() (provided there is such a > >> > method) > >> > > > >> > > Also, I noticed that Velocity weren't very
Re: Velocity truth
On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 4:38 PM, Claude Brissonwrote: > On 28/01/2017 20:23, Alex Fedotov wrote: > > You guys should definitely leave a way of disabling the toString() >> conversion in boolean expressions. >> >> There are many places where people do null checks if #if($obj)...#end. >> >> Classes almost never return an empty string or null string from the >> toString call. Even worse some classes may use toString for debugging >> purposes and produce very long strings (including nested objects, etc.). >> In the code above that would be a huge inefficiency. >> > > I totally agree that a great percentage of #if($foo) statements are just > here to check for nulls. And the current behavior of returning false for > empty strings, empty arrays and empty maps could already be problematic in > this regard > > And I think I have a good proposal about that. > > Since > > $foo differenciate null and "" (by displaying the first and not the second) > $!foo assimilates null and "" (by hiding both) > > why not consider that: > > #if($foo) returns false for null and true for everything else, and > #if($!foo) returns false for null, "", zero, empty arrays, etc... > Yikes. That looks like a scary combo of significant and subtle. It would need to be well-highlighted in the release notes, change logs, docs, etc. I might like it. Maybe. I dunno. The syntax is giving my tired brain spasms, given that it's close to the very different #if( !$foo ). I can't "read" it, if that make sense. It's like a complex regexp, where i have to think my way through it, instead of just reading it. Is there a use-case for having both supported in the same template? Otherwise, it might be better to avoid the subtlety and just support a configuration property for how clever templates can be with evaluating #if( $foo ). Maybe we do the full lookup chain by default, but let people set a directive.if.emptycheck = false That would limit it to just checking for false or null values (presumably still including getAsBoolean, getAsString, and toString), but skipping the "empty" checks. Then the high performance move is: directive.if.emptycheck = false directive.if.tostring.nullcheck = false But the default is for both to be true. > Claude > > >> Alex >> >> On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 2:06 PM, Nathan Bubna wrote: >> >> Shame that i can't remember anymore all my reasons for wanting those >>> "getAs" lookups. Wondering why getAsNumber and getAsBoolean are >>> here >>> too. Anyone else recall the use case? And assuming that i had good reason >>> (that did happen sometimes ), i wonder why i pushed for bucking the >>> "to()" convention. >>> >>> As for the literals, the thought of them being used in #if statements in >>> a >>> template language is cringe-inducing. What's the use-case? Temporary >>> debugging hacks? If so, part of me thinks maybe only 'true' should even >>> be >>> allowed. >>> >>> On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 7:15 AM, Claude Brisson >>> wrote: >>> >>> What is the problem? >>> >>> Velocity "truthiness": >>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY-692 >> >> It should definitely be part of 2.0. I missed it because the issue was >> closed, we should have opened a 2.0 one to remember it. >> >> Thats's the problem if a closed/resolved issue does not have an > assignee. You never know who handled it without reading the entire > thread. A ticket should always have an assignee if code has been > changed. >>> > Here's what had been specified by Nathan at the time (order is >>> meaningful, >>> and falseness seems easier to specify than truth): $obj is null $obj is boolean false $obj returns false from getAsBoolean() (provided there is such a method) $obj is empty string (CharSequence w/length 0) $obj returns true from isEmpty() (provided there is such a method) $obj is array of length 0 $obj returns null from getAsString() (provided there is such a method) $obj returns empty string from getAsString() (provided there is such a method) $obj returns null from getAsNumber() (provided there is such a method) $obj returns 0 from length() or size() (provided there is such a method) $obj returns empty string from toString() (provided there is such a >>> method) >>> Regarding this spec: - I'm not sure about getAsString() ; toString() is usually the standard way of getting the String representation and should be enough. - I'm not convinced by the fact that zero should be true. I hear >>> Nathan's >>> point that for a display language, zero is as legitimate as any other number to be displayed. But it breaks the principle of least surprise, since each and every other language around, when not forbidding number towards boolean implicit conversion, consider zero as false. So I'd rather
Re: Velocity truth (was: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Velocity Engine 2.0 RC6 test build available)
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 12:51 PM, Nathan Bubnawrote: > On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 11:23 AM, Alex Fedotov wrote: > >> You guys should definitely leave a way of disabling the toString() >> conversion in boolean expressions. >> > > Seems reasonable, and also familiar; this may have been discussed before. > Oh, yes, and built. I knew this was familiar. :) See http://velocity.apache.org/engine/2.0/configuration.html : directive.if.tostring.nullcheck = true > >> There are many places where people do null checks if #if($obj)...#end. >> >> Classes almost never return an empty string or null string from the >> toString call. Even worse some classes may use toString for debugging >> purposes and produce very long strings (including nested objects, etc.). >> In the code above that would be a huge inefficiency. >> > > Yes, that's part of the motive to have this lookup chain. If there's a > match higher up, toString() is avoided. Big deal for maps and arrays. > > >> >> Alex >> >> On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 2:06 PM, Nathan Bubna wrote: >> >> > Shame that i can't remember anymore all my reasons for wanting those >> > "getAs" lookups. Wondering why getAsNumber and getAsBoolean are >> here >> > too. Anyone else recall the use case? And assuming that i had good >> reason >> > (that did happen sometimes ), i wonder why i pushed for bucking >> the >> > "to()" convention. >> > >> > As for the literals, the thought of them being used in #if statements >> in a >> > template language is cringe-inducing. What's the use-case? Temporary >> > debugging hacks? If so, part of me thinks maybe only 'true' should even >> be >> > allowed. >> > >> > On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 7:15 AM, Claude Brisson >> > wrote: >> > >> > > >> > > >> > What is the problem? >> > >> > Velocity "truthiness": >> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY-692 >> > >>> >> > >>> It should definitely be part of 2.0. I missed it because the issue >> was >> > >>> closed, we should have opened a 2.0 one to remember it. >> > >>> >> > >> >> > >> Thats's the problem if a closed/resolved issue does not have an >> > >> assignee. You never know who handled it without reading the entire >> > >> thread. A ticket should always have an assignee if code has been >> > changed. >> > >> >> > >> >> > > Here's what had been specified by Nathan at the time (order is >> > meaningful, >> > > and falseness seems easier to specify than truth): >> > > >> > > $obj is null >> > > $obj is boolean false >> > > $obj returns false from getAsBoolean() (provided there is such a >> method) >> > > $obj is empty string (CharSequence w/length 0) >> > > $obj returns true from isEmpty() (provided there is such a method) >> > > $obj is array of length 0 >> > > $obj returns null from getAsString() (provided there is such a method) >> > > $obj returns empty string from getAsString() (provided there is such a >> > > method) >> > > $obj returns null from getAsNumber() (provided there is such a method) >> > > $obj returns 0 from length() or size() (provided there is such a >> method) >> > > $obj returns empty string from toString() (provided there is such a >> > method) >> > > >> > > Regarding this spec: >> > > - I'm not sure about getAsString() ; toString() is usually the >> standard >> > > way of getting the String representation and should be enough. >> > > - I'm not convinced by the fact that zero should be true. I hear >> > Nathan's >> > > point that for a display language, zero is as legitimate as any other >> > > number to be displayed. But it breaks the principle of least surprise, >> > > since each and every other language around, when not forbidding number >> > > towards boolean implicit conversion, consider zero as false. >> > > >> > > So I'd rather go with: >> > > >> > > $obj is null >> > > $obj is Boolean false >> > > $obj is Number zero (whatever Number variant) >> > > $obj returns false from getAsBoolean() (provided there is such a >> method) >> > > $obj is empty string (CharSequence w/length 0) >> > > $obj returns true from isEmpty() (provided there is such a method) >> > > $obj is array of length 0 >> > > $obj returns null from getAsNumber() (provided there is such a method) >> > > $obj returns 0 from length() or size() (provided there is such a >> method) >> > > $obj returns empty string from toString() (provided there is such a >> > method) >> > > >> > > Also, I noticed that Velocity weren't very consistent with literals. >> The >> > > only literal returning true is the 'true' literal. "foo" is false, >> > whereas >> > > it should be consistent with $foo containing "foo". >> > > >> > > Claude >> > > >> > > >> > > - >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@velocity.apache.org >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@velocity.apache.org >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >
Re: Velocity truth (was: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Velocity Engine 2.0 RC6 test build available)
On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 11:23 AM, Alex Fedotovwrote: > You guys should definitely leave a way of disabling the toString() > conversion in boolean expressions. > Seems reasonable, and also familiar; this may have been discussed before. > There are many places where people do null checks if #if($obj)...#end. > > Classes almost never return an empty string or null string from the > toString call. Even worse some classes may use toString for debugging > purposes and produce very long strings (including nested objects, etc.). > In the code above that would be a huge inefficiency. > Yes, that's part of the motive to have this lookup chain. If there's a match higher up, toString() is avoided. Big deal for maps and arrays. > > Alex > > On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 2:06 PM, Nathan Bubna wrote: > > > Shame that i can't remember anymore all my reasons for wanting those > > "getAs" lookups. Wondering why getAsNumber and getAsBoolean are > here > > too. Anyone else recall the use case? And assuming that i had good reason > > (that did happen sometimes ), i wonder why i pushed for bucking the > > "to()" convention. > > > > As for the literals, the thought of them being used in #if statements in > a > > template language is cringe-inducing. What's the use-case? Temporary > > debugging hacks? If so, part of me thinks maybe only 'true' should even > be > > allowed. > > > > On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 7:15 AM, Claude Brisson > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > What is the problem? > > > > Velocity "truthiness": > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY-692 > > >>> > > >>> It should definitely be part of 2.0. I missed it because the issue > was > > >>> closed, we should have opened a 2.0 one to remember it. > > >>> > > >> > > >> Thats's the problem if a closed/resolved issue does not have an > > >> assignee. You never know who handled it without reading the entire > > >> thread. A ticket should always have an assignee if code has been > > changed. > > >> > > >> > > > Here's what had been specified by Nathan at the time (order is > > meaningful, > > > and falseness seems easier to specify than truth): > > > > > > $obj is null > > > $obj is boolean false > > > $obj returns false from getAsBoolean() (provided there is such a > method) > > > $obj is empty string (CharSequence w/length 0) > > > $obj returns true from isEmpty() (provided there is such a method) > > > $obj is array of length 0 > > > $obj returns null from getAsString() (provided there is such a method) > > > $obj returns empty string from getAsString() (provided there is such a > > > method) > > > $obj returns null from getAsNumber() (provided there is such a method) > > > $obj returns 0 from length() or size() (provided there is such a > method) > > > $obj returns empty string from toString() (provided there is such a > > method) > > > > > > Regarding this spec: > > > - I'm not sure about getAsString() ; toString() is usually the > standard > > > way of getting the String representation and should be enough. > > > - I'm not convinced by the fact that zero should be true. I hear > > Nathan's > > > point that for a display language, zero is as legitimate as any other > > > number to be displayed. But it breaks the principle of least surprise, > > > since each and every other language around, when not forbidding number > > > towards boolean implicit conversion, consider zero as false. > > > > > > So I'd rather go with: > > > > > > $obj is null > > > $obj is Boolean false > > > $obj is Number zero (whatever Number variant) > > > $obj returns false from getAsBoolean() (provided there is such a > method) > > > $obj is empty string (CharSequence w/length 0) > > > $obj returns true from isEmpty() (provided there is such a method) > > > $obj is array of length 0 > > > $obj returns null from getAsNumber() (provided there is such a method) > > > $obj returns 0 from length() or size() (provided there is such a > method) > > > $obj returns empty string from toString() (provided there is such a > > method) > > > > > > Also, I noticed that Velocity weren't very consistent with literals. > The > > > only literal returning true is the 'true' literal. "foo" is false, > > whereas > > > it should be consistent with $foo containing "foo". > > > > > > Claude > > > > > > > > > - > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@velocity.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@velocity.apache.org > > > > > > > > >
Re: Velocity truth
Oh, and there is one exception: both of them should of course also be false for the false boolean value. People willing to differentiate null and false do have methods to do so. Claude On 29/01/2017 01:38, Claude Brisson wrote: On 28/01/2017 20:23, Alex Fedotov wrote: You guys should definitely leave a way of disabling the toString() conversion in boolean expressions. There are many places where people do null checks if #if($obj)...#end. Classes almost never return an empty string or null string from the toString call. Even worse some classes may use toString for debugging purposes and produce very long strings (including nested objects, etc.). In the code above that would be a huge inefficiency. I totally agree that a great percentage of #if($foo) statements are just here to check for nulls. And the current behavior of returning false for empty strings, empty arrays and empty maps could already be problematic in this regard And I think I have a good proposal about that. Since $foo differenciate null and "" (by displaying the first and not the second) $!foo assimilates null and "" (by hiding both) why not consider that: #if($foo) returns false for null and true for everything else, and #if($!foo) returns false for null, "", zero, empty arrays, etc... Claude Alex On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 2:06 PM, Nathan Bubnawrote: Shame that i can't remember anymore all my reasons for wanting those "getAs" lookups. Wondering why getAsNumber and getAsBoolean are here too. Anyone else recall the use case? And assuming that i had good reason (that did happen sometimes ), i wonder why i pushed for bucking the "to()" convention. As for the literals, the thought of them being used in #if statements in a template language is cringe-inducing. What's the use-case? Temporary debugging hacks? If so, part of me thinks maybe only 'true' should even be allowed. On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 7:15 AM, Claude Brisson wrote: What is the problem? Velocity "truthiness": https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY-692 It should definitely be part of 2.0. I missed it because the issue was closed, we should have opened a 2.0 one to remember it. Thats's the problem if a closed/resolved issue does not have an assignee. You never know who handled it without reading the entire thread. A ticket should always have an assignee if code has been changed. Here's what had been specified by Nathan at the time (order is meaningful, and falseness seems easier to specify than truth): $obj is null $obj is boolean false $obj returns false from getAsBoolean() (provided there is such a method) $obj is empty string (CharSequence w/length 0) $obj returns true from isEmpty() (provided there is such a method) $obj is array of length 0 $obj returns null from getAsString() (provided there is such a method) $obj returns empty string from getAsString() (provided there is such a method) $obj returns null from getAsNumber() (provided there is such a method) $obj returns 0 from length() or size() (provided there is such a method) $obj returns empty string from toString() (provided there is such a method) Regarding this spec: - I'm not sure about getAsString() ; toString() is usually the standard way of getting the String representation and should be enough. - I'm not convinced by the fact that zero should be true. I hear Nathan's point that for a display language, zero is as legitimate as any other number to be displayed. But it breaks the principle of least surprise, since each and every other language around, when not forbidding number towards boolean implicit conversion, consider zero as false. So I'd rather go with: $obj is null $obj is Boolean false $obj is Number zero (whatever Number variant) $obj returns false from getAsBoolean() (provided there is such a method) $obj is empty string (CharSequence w/length 0) $obj returns true from isEmpty() (provided there is such a method) $obj is array of length 0 $obj returns null from getAsNumber() (provided there is such a method) $obj returns 0 from length() or size() (provided there is such a method) $obj returns empty string from toString() (provided there is such a method) Also, I noticed that Velocity weren't very consistent with literals. The only literal returning true is the 'true' literal. "foo" is false, whereas it should be consistent with $foo containing "foo". Claude - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@velocity.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@velocity.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@velocity.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@velocity.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@velocity.apache.org
Re: Velocity truth
On 28/01/2017 20:23, Alex Fedotov wrote: You guys should definitely leave a way of disabling the toString() conversion in boolean expressions. There are many places where people do null checks if #if($obj)...#end. Classes almost never return an empty string or null string from the toString call. Even worse some classes may use toString for debugging purposes and produce very long strings (including nested objects, etc.). In the code above that would be a huge inefficiency. I totally agree that a great percentage of #if($foo) statements are just here to check for nulls. And the current behavior of returning false for empty strings, empty arrays and empty maps could already be problematic in this regard And I think I have a good proposal about that. Since $foo differenciate null and "" (by displaying the first and not the second) $!foo assimilates null and "" (by hiding both) why not consider that: #if($foo) returns false for null and true for everything else, and #if($!foo) returns false for null, "", zero, empty arrays, etc... Claude Alex On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 2:06 PM, Nathan Bubnawrote: Shame that i can't remember anymore all my reasons for wanting those "getAs" lookups. Wondering why getAsNumber and getAsBoolean are here too. Anyone else recall the use case? And assuming that i had good reason (that did happen sometimes ), i wonder why i pushed for bucking the "to()" convention. As for the literals, the thought of them being used in #if statements in a template language is cringe-inducing. What's the use-case? Temporary debugging hacks? If so, part of me thinks maybe only 'true' should even be allowed. On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 7:15 AM, Claude Brisson wrote: What is the problem? Velocity "truthiness": https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY-692 It should definitely be part of 2.0. I missed it because the issue was closed, we should have opened a 2.0 one to remember it. Thats's the problem if a closed/resolved issue does not have an assignee. You never know who handled it without reading the entire thread. A ticket should always have an assignee if code has been changed. Here's what had been specified by Nathan at the time (order is meaningful, and falseness seems easier to specify than truth): $obj is null $obj is boolean false $obj returns false from getAsBoolean() (provided there is such a method) $obj is empty string (CharSequence w/length 0) $obj returns true from isEmpty() (provided there is such a method) $obj is array of length 0 $obj returns null from getAsString() (provided there is such a method) $obj returns empty string from getAsString() (provided there is such a method) $obj returns null from getAsNumber() (provided there is such a method) $obj returns 0 from length() or size() (provided there is such a method) $obj returns empty string from toString() (provided there is such a method) Regarding this spec: - I'm not sure about getAsString() ; toString() is usually the standard way of getting the String representation and should be enough. - I'm not convinced by the fact that zero should be true. I hear Nathan's point that for a display language, zero is as legitimate as any other number to be displayed. But it breaks the principle of least surprise, since each and every other language around, when not forbidding number towards boolean implicit conversion, consider zero as false. So I'd rather go with: $obj is null $obj is Boolean false $obj is Number zero (whatever Number variant) $obj returns false from getAsBoolean() (provided there is such a method) $obj is empty string (CharSequence w/length 0) $obj returns true from isEmpty() (provided there is such a method) $obj is array of length 0 $obj returns null from getAsNumber() (provided there is such a method) $obj returns 0 from length() or size() (provided there is such a method) $obj returns empty string from toString() (provided there is such a method) Also, I noticed that Velocity weren't very consistent with literals. The only literal returning true is the 'true' literal. "foo" is false, whereas it should be consistent with $foo containing "foo". Claude - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@velocity.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@velocity.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@velocity.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@velocity.apache.org
Re: Velocity truth
On 28/01/2017 20:06, Nathan Bubna wrote: Shame that i can't remember anymore all my reasons for wanting those "getAs" lookups. Wondering why getAsNumber and getAsBoolean are here too. Anyone else recall the use case? And assuming that i had good reason (that did happen sometimes ), i wonder why i pushed for bucking the "to()" convention. It seems like Java8 went your way: https://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/api/java/util/function/BooleanSupplier.html Anyway, we can check both getAsBoolean and toBoolean, as with getAsNumber and toNumber, etc... but maybe we should stick to to methods. As for the literals, the thought of them being used in #if statements in a template language is cringe-inducing. What's the use-case? Temporary debugging hacks? If so, part of me thinks maybe only 'true' should even be allowed. Well, imagine a newcomer to Velocity trying to understand its behavior. He will typically write #if("") or #if(0) to check what happens for an empty string or for zero. Not having a consistent behavior may make him build wrong assumptions. Or a developer writing #if(0) instead of #if(false) to temporarily inhibit a portion of code. Or think educational use... Claude On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 7:15 AM, Claude Brissonwrote: What is the problem? Velocity "truthiness": https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY-692 It should definitely be part of 2.0. I missed it because the issue was closed, we should have opened a 2.0 one to remember it. Thats's the problem if a closed/resolved issue does not have an assignee. You never know who handled it without reading the entire thread. A ticket should always have an assignee if code has been changed. Here's what had been specified by Nathan at the time (order is meaningful, and falseness seems easier to specify than truth): $obj is null $obj is boolean false $obj returns false from getAsBoolean() (provided there is such a method) $obj is empty string (CharSequence w/length 0) $obj returns true from isEmpty() (provided there is such a method) $obj is array of length 0 $obj returns null from getAsString() (provided there is such a method) $obj returns empty string from getAsString() (provided there is such a method) $obj returns null from getAsNumber() (provided there is such a method) $obj returns 0 from length() or size() (provided there is such a method) $obj returns empty string from toString() (provided there is such a method) Regarding this spec: - I'm not sure about getAsString() ; toString() is usually the standard way of getting the String representation and should be enough. - I'm not convinced by the fact that zero should be true. I hear Nathan's point that for a display language, zero is as legitimate as any other number to be displayed. But it breaks the principle of least surprise, since each and every other language around, when not forbidding number towards boolean implicit conversion, consider zero as false. So I'd rather go with: $obj is null $obj is Boolean false $obj is Number zero (whatever Number variant) $obj returns false from getAsBoolean() (provided there is such a method) $obj is empty string (CharSequence w/length 0) $obj returns true from isEmpty() (provided there is such a method) $obj is array of length 0 $obj returns null from getAsNumber() (provided there is such a method) $obj returns 0 from length() or size() (provided there is such a method) $obj returns empty string from toString() (provided there is such a method) Also, I noticed that Velocity weren't very consistent with literals. The only literal returning true is the 'true' literal. "foo" is false, whereas it should be consistent with $foo containing "foo". Claude - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@velocity.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@velocity.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@velocity.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@velocity.apache.org
Re: Velocity truth (was: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Velocity Engine 2.0 RC6 test build available)
You guys should definitely leave a way of disabling the toString() conversion in boolean expressions. There are many places where people do null checks if #if($obj)...#end. Classes almost never return an empty string or null string from the toString call. Even worse some classes may use toString for debugging purposes and produce very long strings (including nested objects, etc.). In the code above that would be a huge inefficiency. Alex On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 2:06 PM, Nathan Bubnawrote: > Shame that i can't remember anymore all my reasons for wanting those > "getAs" lookups. Wondering why getAsNumber and getAsBoolean are here > too. Anyone else recall the use case? And assuming that i had good reason > (that did happen sometimes ), i wonder why i pushed for bucking the > "to()" convention. > > As for the literals, the thought of them being used in #if statements in a > template language is cringe-inducing. What's the use-case? Temporary > debugging hacks? If so, part of me thinks maybe only 'true' should even be > allowed. > > On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 7:15 AM, Claude Brisson > wrote: > > > > > > What is the problem? > > Velocity "truthiness": > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY-692 > >>> > >>> It should definitely be part of 2.0. I missed it because the issue was > >>> closed, we should have opened a 2.0 one to remember it. > >>> > >> > >> Thats's the problem if a closed/resolved issue does not have an > >> assignee. You never know who handled it without reading the entire > >> thread. A ticket should always have an assignee if code has been > changed. > >> > >> > > Here's what had been specified by Nathan at the time (order is > meaningful, > > and falseness seems easier to specify than truth): > > > > $obj is null > > $obj is boolean false > > $obj returns false from getAsBoolean() (provided there is such a method) > > $obj is empty string (CharSequence w/length 0) > > $obj returns true from isEmpty() (provided there is such a method) > > $obj is array of length 0 > > $obj returns null from getAsString() (provided there is such a method) > > $obj returns empty string from getAsString() (provided there is such a > > method) > > $obj returns null from getAsNumber() (provided there is such a method) > > $obj returns 0 from length() or size() (provided there is such a method) > > $obj returns empty string from toString() (provided there is such a > method) > > > > Regarding this spec: > > - I'm not sure about getAsString() ; toString() is usually the standard > > way of getting the String representation and should be enough. > > - I'm not convinced by the fact that zero should be true. I hear > Nathan's > > point that for a display language, zero is as legitimate as any other > > number to be displayed. But it breaks the principle of least surprise, > > since each and every other language around, when not forbidding number > > towards boolean implicit conversion, consider zero as false. > > > > So I'd rather go with: > > > > $obj is null > > $obj is Boolean false > > $obj is Number zero (whatever Number variant) > > $obj returns false from getAsBoolean() (provided there is such a method) > > $obj is empty string (CharSequence w/length 0) > > $obj returns true from isEmpty() (provided there is such a method) > > $obj is array of length 0 > > $obj returns null from getAsNumber() (provided there is such a method) > > $obj returns 0 from length() or size() (provided there is such a method) > > $obj returns empty string from toString() (provided there is such a > method) > > > > Also, I noticed that Velocity weren't very consistent with literals. The > > only literal returning true is the 'true' literal. "foo" is false, > whereas > > it should be consistent with $foo containing "foo". > > > > Claude > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@velocity.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@velocity.apache.org > > > > >
Re: Velocity truth (was: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Velocity Engine 2.0 RC6 test build available)
Shame that i can't remember anymore all my reasons for wanting those "getAs" lookups. Wondering why getAsNumber and getAsBoolean are here too. Anyone else recall the use case? And assuming that i had good reason (that did happen sometimes ), i wonder why i pushed for bucking the "to()" convention. As for the literals, the thought of them being used in #if statements in a template language is cringe-inducing. What's the use-case? Temporary debugging hacks? If so, part of me thinks maybe only 'true' should even be allowed. On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 7:15 AM, Claude Brissonwrote: > > What is the problem? Velocity "truthiness": >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY-692 >>> >>> It should definitely be part of 2.0. I missed it because the issue was >>> closed, we should have opened a 2.0 one to remember it. >>> >> >> Thats's the problem if a closed/resolved issue does not have an >> assignee. You never know who handled it without reading the entire >> thread. A ticket should always have an assignee if code has been changed. >> >> > Here's what had been specified by Nathan at the time (order is meaningful, > and falseness seems easier to specify than truth): > > $obj is null > $obj is boolean false > $obj returns false from getAsBoolean() (provided there is such a method) > $obj is empty string (CharSequence w/length 0) > $obj returns true from isEmpty() (provided there is such a method) > $obj is array of length 0 > $obj returns null from getAsString() (provided there is such a method) > $obj returns empty string from getAsString() (provided there is such a > method) > $obj returns null from getAsNumber() (provided there is such a method) > $obj returns 0 from length() or size() (provided there is such a method) > $obj returns empty string from toString() (provided there is such a method) > > Regarding this spec: > - I'm not sure about getAsString() ; toString() is usually the standard > way of getting the String representation and should be enough. > - I'm not convinced by the fact that zero should be true. I hear Nathan's > point that for a display language, zero is as legitimate as any other > number to be displayed. But it breaks the principle of least surprise, > since each and every other language around, when not forbidding number > towards boolean implicit conversion, consider zero as false. > > So I'd rather go with: > > $obj is null > $obj is Boolean false > $obj is Number zero (whatever Number variant) > $obj returns false from getAsBoolean() (provided there is such a method) > $obj is empty string (CharSequence w/length 0) > $obj returns true from isEmpty() (provided there is such a method) > $obj is array of length 0 > $obj returns null from getAsNumber() (provided there is such a method) > $obj returns 0 from length() or size() (provided there is such a method) > $obj returns empty string from toString() (provided there is such a method) > > Also, I noticed that Velocity weren't very consistent with literals. The > only literal returning true is the 'true' literal. "foo" is false, whereas > it should be consistent with $foo containing "foo". > > Claude > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@velocity.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@velocity.apache.org > >
Velocity truth (was: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Velocity Engine 2.0 RC6 test build available)
What is the problem? Velocity "truthiness": https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY-692 It should definitely be part of 2.0. I missed it because the issue was closed, we should have opened a 2.0 one to remember it. Thats's the problem if a closed/resolved issue does not have an assignee. You never know who handled it without reading the entire thread. A ticket should always have an assignee if code has been changed. Here's what had been specified by Nathan at the time (order is meaningful, and falseness seems easier to specify than truth): $obj is null $obj is boolean false $obj returns false from getAsBoolean() (provided there is such a method) $obj is empty string (CharSequence w/length 0) $obj returns true from isEmpty() (provided there is such a method) $obj is array of length 0 $obj returns null from getAsString() (provided there is such a method) $obj returns empty string from getAsString() (provided there is such a method) $obj returns null from getAsNumber() (provided there is such a method) $obj returns 0 from length() or size() (provided there is such a method) $obj returns empty string from toString() (provided there is such a method) Regarding this spec: - I'm not sure about getAsString() ; toString() is usually the standard way of getting the String representation and should be enough. - I'm not convinced by the fact that zero should be true. I hear Nathan's point that for a display language, zero is as legitimate as any other number to be displayed. But it breaks the principle of least surprise, since each and every other language around, when not forbidding number towards boolean implicit conversion, consider zero as false. So I'd rather go with: $obj is null $obj is Boolean false $obj is Number zero (whatever Number variant) $obj returns false from getAsBoolean() (provided there is such a method) $obj is empty string (CharSequence w/length 0) $obj returns true from isEmpty() (provided there is such a method) $obj is array of length 0 $obj returns null from getAsNumber() (provided there is such a method) $obj returns 0 from length() or size() (provided there is such a method) $obj returns empty string from toString() (provided there is such a method) Also, I noticed that Velocity weren't very consistent with literals. The only literal returning true is the 'true' literal. "foo" is false, whereas it should be consistent with $foo containing "foo". Claude - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@velocity.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@velocity.apache.org