Re: Sending push using sendsms?
I'm sorry, what do you meen SI meesage? regards, Dziugas Baltrunas On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, [iso-8859-1] Peter Löfman wrote: Is it possible to send a SI message using sendsms cgi script? If so, has anyone done it? Any example? /Peter Lofman _ Planera semestern på MSN http://www.msn.se/resor/default.asp
Interesting .........??????????
a. USA supported Bin Laden and the Taliban for years, and viewed them as freedom fighters against the Russians?b. As late as 1998, the US was paying the salary of every single Taliban official in Afghanistan?c. There is more oil and gas in the Caspian Sea, but you need a pipeline through Afghanistan to get that out?d. UNOCAL, a giant oil conglomerate, wanted to build a 1000 mile pipeline from the Caspian Sea through Afghanistan to the Arabian Sea?e. UNOCAL spend $ 10,000,000,000 on geological studies for the pipeline construction, and courted the Taliban for their support in allowing the construction to begin?f. All leading Taliban officials were in Texas negotiating with UNOCAL in 1998?g. In 1999, Taliban changed its mind and threw UNOCAL out of the country and awarded the pipeline project to a company in Argentina?h. John Maresca, VP of UNOCAL testified before Congress and said no pipeline should be set until the Taliban was gone and a more friendly government was established?i. After 1999, the Taliban became the most evil people in the world.j. In 2001, Bush declares war against Afghanistan, though not a single Afghani was involved in the plane hijacking?k. Bush blamed Bin Laden, but did not offer any proof, saying it was confidential?l. Talibans offered to hand over Bin Laden if there was proof, but Bush bombed Afghanistan instead?m. We now have a new government in Afghanistan, which is friendlier?n. That the leader of the new government is one gentleman called Hamid Karzai, who formerly worked for UNOCAL?o. Bush appoints a special envoy (Lakhdar Ibrahimi) to represent the US to deal with the new government. This special envoy was formerly chief consultant to UNOCAL?p. The US government quietly announces in January 2002 that it willsupport the Trans-Afghan pipeline construction?q. President Musharraf and Hamid Karzai announce agreement in February 2002 to build proposed gas pipeline from Central Asia to Pakistan through Afghanistan?...And we thought they were fighting terrorism here, didn't we...It is all about OIL... Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ADVERTISEMENT To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: Interesting .........???..Plz Ignore
SORRY ABOUT THIS..NO OFFENCE MEANT..IT WENT TO THIS ID BY MISTAKE..PLZ IGNORE IT. - Original Message - From: amit sehgal To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; Vivek Choudhary ; Shantanu Jog ; Prasanth Varma Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 2:28 PM Subject: Interesting .?? a. USA supported Bin Laden and the Taliban for years, and viewed them as freedom fighters against the Russians?b. As late as 1998, the US was paying the salary of every single Taliban official in Afghanistan?c. There is more oil and gas in the Caspian Sea, but you need a pipeline through Afghanistan to get that out?d. UNOCAL, a giant oil conglomerate, wanted to build a 1000 mile pipeline from the Caspian Sea through Afghanistan to the Arabian Sea?e. UNOCAL spend $ 10,000,000,000 on geological studies for the pipeline construction, and courted the Taliban for their support in allowing the construction to begin?f. All leading Taliban officials were in Texas negotiating with UNOCAL in 1998?g. In 1999, Taliban changed its mind and threw UNOCAL out of the country and awarded the pipeline project to a company in Argentina?h. John Maresca, VP of UNOCAL testified before Congress and said no pipeline should be set until the Taliban was gone and a more friendly government was established?i. After 1999, the Taliban became the most evil people in the world.j. In 2001, Bush declares war against Afghanistan, though not a single Afghani was involved in the plane hijacking?k. Bush blamed Bin Laden, but did not offer any proof, saying it was confidential?l. Talibans offered to hand over Bin Laden if there was proof, but Bush bombed Afghanistan instead?m. We now have a new government in Afghanistan, which is friendlier?n. That the leader of the new government is one gentleman called Hamid Karzai, who formerly worked for UNOCAL?o. Bush appoints a special envoy (Lakhdar Ibrahimi) to represent the US to deal with the new government. This special envoy was formerly chief consultant to UNOCAL?p. The US government quietly announces in January 2002 that it willsupport the Trans-Afghan pipeline construction?q. President Musharraf and Hamid Karzai announce agreement in February 2002 to build proposed gas pipeline from Central Asia to Pakistan through Afghanistan?...And we thought they were fighting terrorism here, didn't we...It is all about OIL... Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ADVERTISEMENT To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: Sending push using sendsms?
That is what we do to deliver SI to handsets: http://curry:13013/cgi-bin/sendsms?username=testerpassword=foobarto=%2B447771537333text=%01%06%04%03%AE%81%EA%02%05%6A%00%45%C6%0C%03134.231.12.23/Title.mid?210125%00%11%038@asdksas%00%08%0A%C3%07%20%02%10%17%09%02%23%10%C3%07%20%02%10%17%09%15%33%01%03TestTune This can also contain the Artist%00%01%01udh=%06%05%04%0B%84%23%F0 One of the main pitfalls of sending SI is that the expiry date is not set correctly so the handset will just ignore the message. WAP SI MESSAGE Breakdown of the message: http://curry:13013/cgi-bin/sendsms? username=tester password=foobar to=%2B447771537333 text= %01 Transaction ID/Push ID (Start of WSP header (Wireless Session Protocol)) %06 PDU type (06=push) %04 header lenght %03 content type %AE headers %81 : %EA _:_(End of WSP header) %02 Version number WBXML version 1.2 %05 SI 1.0 Public Identifier %6A Charset UTF-8 %00 String table length %45 si with content %C6 indication %0C href=http:// %03 inline string follows 134.231.12.23/Title.mid?210125%00 %11 si id %03inline string follows 8@asdksas%00(random number followed by @asdksas) %08 action signal high %0A created= %C3 OPAQUE date follows %07 length= %20%02 year %10%17 month day %09%02%23 hour minute seconds %10 si-expire= %C3 OPAQUE date follows %07 length= %20%02 year %10%17 month day %09%15%33 hour minute seconds %01 END (of indication attribute list) %03 Inline string follows TestTune This can also contain the Artist%00 %01 END (of indication element) %01 END (of si element) udh=%06%05%04%0B%84%23%F0 On Thu, 2003-01-23 at 07:17, Peter Löfman wrote: Is it possible to send a SI message using sendsms cgi script? If so, has anyone done it? Any example? /Peter Lofman _ Planera semestern på MSN http://www.msn.se/resor/default.asp
RE: Sending push using sendsms?
In Kannel user guide I found: The push content is sended to the phones over SMS, but the content is fetched by the phone over IP bearer, for instance CSD or GPRS. Because Push Proxy Gateway tokenises SI and SL documents, it may fit one SMS message (if not, it is segmented for transfer). Using two bearers seems to be an unnecessary complication. But quite simply, phones currently operate this way. Push over GPRS can only simplify matters. I'm not sure if that answers your question, and if that works, but I have an additional question: Is it possible to send SI directly over WSP (IP bearer - GPRS) and not over SMS? It seems to me that WAP PUSH specification enables that possibility. Is that (going to be) supported in Kannel? Thanks Damir Salantic On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, [iso-8859-1] Peter Löfman wrote: Is it possible to send a SI message using sendsms cgi script? If so, has anyone done it? Any example? /Peter Lofman
Re: Sending push using sendsms?
The phones must first support this kind of push, of course. Aarno On Thursday, January 23, 2003, at 10:21 AM, Damir Salantic wrote: In Kannel user guide I found: The push content is sended to the phones over SMS, but the content is fetched by the phone over IP bearer, for instance CSD or GPRS. Because Push Proxy Gateway tokenises SI and SL documents, it may fit one SMS message (if not, it is segmented for transfer). Using two bearers seems to be an unnecessary complication. But quite simply, phones currently operate this way. Push over GPRS can only simplify matters. I'm not sure if that answers your question, and if that works, but I have an additional question: Is it possible to send SI directly over WSP (IP bearer - GPRS) and not over SMS? It seems to me that WAP PUSH specification enables that possibility. Is that (going to be) supported in Kannel? Thanks Damir Salantic On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, [iso-8859-1] Peter Löfman wrote: Is it possible to send a SI message using sendsms cgi script? If so, has anyone done it? Any example? /Peter Lofman
Re: Sending push using sendsms?
Thanks alot Bernd! I will try this out! /Peter Lofman From: Bernd Kronmueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Peter Löfman [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Sending push using sendsms? Date: 23 Jan 2003 09:13:05 + That is what we do to deliver SI to handsets: http://curry:13013/cgi-bin/sendsms?username=testerpassword=foobarto=%2B447771537333text=%01%06%04%03%AE%81%EA%02%05%6A%00%45%C6%0C%03134.231.12.23/Title.mid?210125%00%11%038@asdksas%00%08%0A%C3%07%20%02%10%17%09%02%23%10%C3%07%20%02%10%17%09%15%33%01%03TestTune This can also contain the Artist%00%01%01udh=%06%05%04%0B%84%23%F0 One of the main pitfalls of sending SI is that the expiry date is not set correctly so the handset will just ignore the message. WAP SI MESSAGE Breakdown of the message: http://curry:13013/cgi-bin/sendsms? username=tester password=foobar to=%2B447771537333 text= %01 Transaction ID/Push ID (Start of WSP header (Wireless Session Protocol)) %06 PDU type (06=push) %04 header lenght %03 content type %AE headers %81 : %EA _:_(End of WSP header) %02 Version number WBXML version 1.2 %05 SI 1.0 Public Identifier %6A Charset UTF-8 %00 String table length %45 si with content %C6 indication %0C href=http:// %03 inline string follows 134.231.12.23/Title.mid?210125%00 %11 si id %03inline string follows 8@asdksas%00(random number followed by @asdksas) %08 action signal high %0A created= %C3 OPAQUE date follows %07 length= %20%02 year %10%17 month day %09%02%23 hour minute seconds %10 si-expire= %C3 OPAQUE date follows %07 length= %20%02 year %10%17 month day %09%15%33 hour minute seconds %01 END (of indication attribute list) %03 Inline string follows TestTune This can also contain the Artist%00 %01 END (of indication element) %01 END (of si element) udh=%06%05%04%0B%84%23%F0 On Thu, 2003-01-23 at 07:17, Peter Löfman wrote: Is it possible to send a SI message using sendsms cgi script? If so, has anyone done it? Any example? /Peter Lofman _ Planera semestern på MSN http://www.msn.se/resor/default.asp _ Chatta med vänner på nätet, pröva MSN Messenger http://messenger.msn.se
RE: SAR panic
Title: RE: SAR panic Dear Slava, While ESAR is not implemented I think a graceful way to hanlde it is to reduce client sdu size sent to wsp to SAR_SEGM_SIZE*255. Also I can change SAR_SEGM_SIZE to be let's say 1300. it will change the maximum file size to 331K from 146K. But it may cause a problem for the phones that are connected using CSD. Actually SAR_SEGM_SIZE has to be equal to MTU. Do you know a way to detect MTU to the phone that works fast enough? Let me know what you think Igor -Original Message- From: Vjacheslav Chekushin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 9:31 AM To: devel Subject: SAR panic Hi, list. Seems that SAR incorrectly handles cases when segments count255 wapbox.log: 2003-01-22 19:14:01 [6] DEBUG: WTP: resp_machine 718, state RESULT_RESP_WAIT, event RcvAck. 2003-01-22 19:14:01 [6] DEBUG: WTP: continue_sar_result(): lsegm=254, nsegm=440, csegm=251 2003-01-22 19:14:01 [6] DEBUG: WTP: dispath_to_wdp(): psn = 255 2003-01-22 19:14:01 [6] PANIC: gwlib/octstr.c:1677: octstr_set_bits: Assertion `value = mask' failed. -- Vjacheslav Chekushin mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latvian Mobile Phone Company http://www.lmt.lv
Re: [PATCH] unneeded counter increase?!
Stipe Tolj wrote: Hi list, is this patch making sense: RCS file: /home/cvs/gateway/gw/smsc/smsc_emi2.c,v retrieving revision 1.7 diff -r1.7 smsc_emi2.c 713d712 counter_increase(conn-received); Can someone who runs emi2 in production state a comment and/or vote please?! thanks for the votes. As most of you have noticed via the report mailing list, it has been commited. Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Wapme Systems AG Vogelsanger Weg 80 40470 Düsseldorf Tel: +49-211-74845-0 Fax: +49-211-74845-299 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de --- wapme.net - wherever you are
Re: [PATCH] Race between boxc_sender and smsbox identification
Hi Robert, Robert Galach wrote: I found a problem in Kannel gateway (CVS version). Let's check scenario. Consider bearerbox and 1 smsbox named some_box_id. 1) Start bearerbox, it is waiting for smsboxes. 2) Start smsbox with smsbox_id = some_box_id, connect to bearerbox. 3) In bearerbox struct Boxc is created and made connection to smsbox. Default shared list for incoming_sms is set for this smsbox connection. 4) Bearebox starts boxc_sender thread for connected smsbox and sender waits for incoming_sms in shared list until some msg will arrive. 5) Smsbox identify itself as some_box_id and new private list for incoming_sms is created, but previous cannot be destroyed because it is shared. But sender is still waiting on shared list!!! And it will wait forever. No sms can be sent by smsbox some_box_id. I have patched this bug in local version by adding mutex to struct boxc and forcing boxc_sender to wait on this mutex until smsbox will identify itself. Then sender starts his real job. Changed also smsbox.c to send cmd_identify even if boxc_id is NULL. The patch is attached. I hope it removes problem. +1 from me, patch commited to cvs. Thanks a lot! You're mentioned in the ChangeLog hall-of-fame ;) Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Wapme Systems AG Vogelsanger Weg 80 40470 Düsseldorf Tel: +49-211-74845-0 Fax: +49-211-74845-299 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de --- wapme.net - wherever you are
Re: Serious bug in wml_compiler.c
Vjacheslav, the attached .wml file contains non-textual characters?! Is this hence supposed to be a valid WML document? Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Wapme Systems AG Vogelsanger Weg 80 40470 Düsseldorf Tel: +49-211-74845-0 Fax: +49-211-74845-299 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de --- wapme.net - wherever you are
Re: Sending push using sendsms?
Peter Löfman wrote: Thanks alot Bernd! I will try this out! why do you want to live in hard land?! while Aarno has written the PPG in wapbox that does all the WAP push magic. We use it for MMS notification pushing via SMS. Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Wapme Systems AG Vogelsanger Weg 80 40470 Düsseldorf Tel: +49-211-74845-0 Fax: +49-211-74845-299 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de --- wapme.net - wherever you are
Re: SAR panic
Vjacheslav Chekushin wrote: Hi, Igor. I think, first of all, panic must be eliminated. yep, agreed. Panics do stop wapbox service. Hence a download of a too large file kills wapbox, which is not the way we want it in an operational environment. If something can't be done, then other clients should not suffer from this. So reduce client sdu size to SAR_SEGM_SIZE*255 is Ok. I'm not sure about changing SAR_SEGM_SIZE. If nokia gw uses value 576, may be some nokia models doesn't work stable with large SAR_SEGM_SIZE? Any way, current values are tested already, so new values must be also tested first. I recommend you guys do the testings and record results in an according spread sheet. We can apply patched locally at Wapme here and test some more phone models if we have to. Can you guys provide a patch?! Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Wapme Systems AG Vogelsanger Weg 80 40470 Düsseldorf Tel: +49-211-74845-0 Fax: +49-211-74845-299 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de --- wapme.net - wherever you are
Re: Bug in gw/wap_push_pap_compiler.c - infinite loop
Paul Keogh wrote:
In the function parse_content (), the lines
while (octstr_get_char(*address, pos) !=
octstr_get_char(nameos, 0) pos = 0) {
pos = drop_character(address, pos);
}
should be replaced with
while ((octstr_len (*address) 0) octstr_get_char(*address, pos) !=
octstr_get_char(nameos, 0) pos = 0) {
pos = drop_character(address, pos);
}
otherwise an infinite loop results. This is easy to reproduce. Drop
the /TYPE=xxx from an address in the PAP document. This should give
back an error; instead the WAP box hangs in an infinite loop.
commited to cvs.
Thanks Paul!
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wapme Systems AG
Vogelsanger Weg 80
40470 Düsseldorf
Tel: +49-211-74845-0
Fax: +49-211-74845-299
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de
---
wapme.net - wherever you are
Re: Serious bug in wml_compiler.c
Hi, Stipe. What do you meen non-textual characters'? If it is characters with code128, then it is legal at least untill we don't use it in tag names. And since you have problem description, you can create own wml documnet witch force to create large string table in wml_compiler. I attach such wml file. As you see I use unknown atribute border. I know that such attribute doesn't exists ;-). But panic occure exactly in case when long strings (duplicated) are either in attribute name or attribute value. Stipe Tolj wrote: Vjacheslav, the attached .wml file contains non-textual characters?! Is this hence supposed to be a valid WML document? Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- -- Vjacheslav Chekushinmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latvian Mobile Phone Companyhttp://www.lmt.lv test.wml.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data
