Re: MMS PDU
Hi List, I have been able to test successfully the following: udh=%06%05%04%0b%84%23%f0text=%0f%06%03%be%af%84%8c%82%98%39%39%39%35%40%66%6c%79%65%72%6f%6e%65%2e%63%6f%6d%00%8d%90%8a%80%8e%01%64%88%06%80%04%3d%64%8d%80%83%YourURI%00 However, with reference to WAP-206-MMSCTR-20010612-a, I should get a WSP/HTTP GET.req. But I got the following: ***2002-08-07 12:34:58 [6] DEBUG: type = RcvInvoke2002-08-07 12:34:58 [6] DEBUG: user_data =2002-08-07 12:34:58 [6] DEBUG: Octet string at 80eec08:2002-08-07 12:34:58 [6] DEBUG: len: 422002-08-07 12:34:58 [6] DEBUG: size: 432002-08-07 12:34:58 [6] DEBUG: immutable: 02002-08-07 12:34:58 [6] DEBUG: data: 01 10 13 13 04 80 86 a0 2002-08-07 12:34:58 [6] DEBUG: data: 00 04 81 92 a7 60 02 82 .`..2002-08-07 12:34:58 [6] DEBUG: data: 00 02 83 01 02 84 01 80 2002-08-07 12:34:58 [6] DEBUG: data: 80 83 99 81 ea 20 a9 20 . .2002-08-07 12:34:58 [6] DEBUG: data: 4e 6f 6b 69 61 37 36 35 Nokia7652002-08-07 12:34:58 [6] DEBUG: data: 30 00 0.2002-08-07 12:34:58 [6] DEBUG: Octet string dump ends.2002-08-07 12:34:58 [6] DEBUG: tcl = 22002-08-07 12:34:58 [6] DEBUG: tid = 314722002-08-07 12:34:58 [6] DEBUG: tid_new = 02002-08-07 12:34:58 [6] DEBUG: rid = 12002-08-07 12:34:58 [6] DEBUG: up_flag = 12002-08-07 12:34:58 [6] DEBUG: no_cache_supported = 02002-08-07 12:34:58 [6] DEBUG: version = 02002-08-07 12:34:58 [6] DEBUG: gtr = 12002-08-07 12:34:58 [6] DEBUG: ttr = 1*** This doesn't seem to be a WSP/HTTP GET.req. What type of request is it ? Or did I follow thewrong process ? Regards, ShantanuDo You Yahoo!? HotJobs, a Yahoo! service - Search Thousands of New Jobs
Re: MMS PDU
Hi, 2002-08-07 12:34:58 [6] DEBUG: rid = 1 2002-08-07 12:34:58 [6] DEBUG: up_flag = 1 2002-08-07 12:34:58 [6] DEBUG: no_cache_supported = 0 2002-08-07 12:34:58 [6] DEBUG: version = 0 2002-08-07 12:34:58 [6] DEBUG: gtr = 1 2002-08-07 12:34:58 [6] DEBUG: ttr = 1 * ** This doesn't seem to be a WSP/HTTP GET.req. What type of request is it ? Or did I follow thewrong process ? This is a WTP PDU. What our WSP PDU look like ? A The bearerbox.log is attached.In my previous mail, up the stack, that was the highest place where I got the PDU. Iwas getting upto : wtp_resp.c/handle_erroneous_field_in(): WTP_RESP: no sar implemented aborting transaction. At that location I used "wap_event_dump(event)". It did not gouptothe WSP layer. Regards, Shantanu JogDo You Yahoo!? HotJobs, a Yahoo! service - Search Thousands of New Jobs bearer box log as on 09-08-2002 2002-08-09 11:39:38 [10] DEBUG: datagram received 2002-08-09 11:39:38 [10] DEBUG: dumping udp 2002-08-09 11:39:38 [10] DEBUG: Octet string at 80d8998: 2002-08-09 11:39:38 [10] DEBUG: len: 46 2002-08-09 11:39:38 [10] DEBUG: size: 47 2002-08-09 11:39:38 [10] DEBUG: immutable: 0 2002-08-09 11:39:38 [10] DEBUG: data: 0a 46 40 12 01 10 13 13 .F@. 2002-08-09 11:39:38 [10] DEBUG: data: 04 80 86 a0 00 04 81 92 2002-08-09 11:39:38 [10] DEBUG: data: a7 60 02 82 00 02 83 01 .`.. 2002-08-09 11:39:38 [10] DEBUG: data: 02 84 01 80 80 83 99 81 2002-08-09 11:39:38 [10] DEBUG: data: ea 20 a9 20 4e 6f 6b 69 . . Noki 2002-08-09 11:39:38 [10] DEBUG: data: 61 37 36 35 30 00 a7650. 2002-08-09 11:39:38 [10] DEBUG: Octet string dump ends. 2002-08-09 11:39:38 [10] DEBUG: Creating WDP 2002-08-09 11:39:38 [10] DEBUG: dumping user data= F@ 2002-08-09 11:39:38 [10] DEBUG: dumping wdp 2002-08-09 11:39:38 [10] DEBUG: Msg object at 80d99b0: 2002-08-09 11:39:38 [10] DEBUG: type: wdp_datagram 2002-08-09 11:39:38 [10] DEBUG: wdp_datagram.source_address: 2002-08-09 11:39:38 [10] DEBUG: Octet string at 80d8a10: 2002-08-09 11:39:38 [10] DEBUG:len: 13 2002-08-09 11:39:38 [10] DEBUG:size: 14 2002-08-09 11:39:38 [10] DEBUG:immutable: 0 2002-08-09 11:39:38 [10] DEBUG:data: 32 30 33 2e 32 31 32 2e 203.212. 2002-08-09 11:39:38 [10] DEBUG:data: 36 35 2e 34 3065.40 2002-08-09 11:39:38 [10] DEBUG: Octet string dump ends. 2002-08-09 11:39:38 [10] DEBUG: wdp_datagram.source_port: 44911 2002-08-09 11:39:38 [10] DEBUG: wdp_datagram.destination_address: 2002-08-09 11:39:38 [10] DEBUG: Octet string at 80d8a40: 2002-08-09 11:39:38 [10] DEBUG:len: 7 2002-08-09 11:39:38 [10] DEBUG:size: 8 2002-08-09 11:39:38 [10] DEBUG:immutable: 0 2002-08-09 11:39:38 [10] DEBUG:data: 30 2e 30 2e 30 2e 30 0.0.0.0 2002-08-09 11:39:38 [10] DEBUG: Octet string dump ends. 2002-08-09 11:39:38 [10] DEBUG: wdp_datagram.destination_port: 9201 2002-08-09 11:39:38 [10] DEBUG: wdp_datagram.user_data: 2002-08-09 11:39:38 [10] DEBUG: Octet string at 80d8998: 2002-08-09 11:39:38 [10] DEBUG:len: 46 2002-08-09 11:39:38 [10] DEBUG:size: 47 2002-08-09 11:39:38 [10] DEBUG:immutable: 0 2002-08-09 11:39:38 [10] DEBUG:data: 0a 46 40 12 01 10 13 13 .F@. 2002-08-09 11:39:38 [10] DEBUG:data: 04 80 86 a0 00 04 81 92 2002-08-09 11:39:38 [10] DEBUG:data: a7 60 02 82 00 02 83 01 .`.. 2002-08-09 11:39:38 [10] DEBUG:data: 02 84 01 80 80 83 99 81 2002-08-09 11:39:38 [10] DEBUG:data: ea 20 a9 20 4e 6f 6b 69 . . Noki 2002-08-09 11:39:38 [10] DEBUG:data: 61 37 36 35 30 00 a7650. 2002-08-09 11:39:38 [10] DEBUG: Octet string dump ends. 2002-08-09 11:39:38 [10] DEBUG: Msg object ends. 2002-08-09 11:39:38 [12] DEBUG: Did not find previous routing info for WDP, generating new 2002-08-09 11:39:38 [12] DEBUG: sending wdp to wapbox specific queue 2002-08-09 11:39:38 [16] DEBUG: boxc_sender: sent message to 127.0.0.1, from wapbox queue 2002-08-09 11:39:42 [10] DEBUG: datagram received 2002-08-09 11:39:42 [10] DEBUG: dumping udp 2002-08-09 11:39:42 [10] DEBUG: Octet string at 80d8a58: 2002-08-09 11:39:42 [10] DEBUG: len: 46 2002-08-09 11:39:42 [10] DEBUG: size: 47 2002-08-09 11:39:42 [10] DEBUG: immutable: 0 2002-08-09 11:39:42 [10] DEBUG: data: 0b 46 40 12 01 10 13 13 .F@. 2002-08-09 11:39:42 [10] DEBUG: data: 04 80 86 a0 00 04 81 92 2002-08-09 11:39:42 [10] DEBUG: data: a7 60 02 82 00 02 83 01 .`.. 2002-08-09 11:39:42 [10] DEBUG: data: 02 84 01 80 80 83 99 81 2002-08-09 11:39:42 [10] DEBUG: data: ea 20 a9 20 4e 6f 6b 69 . . Noki 2002-08-09 11:39:42 [10] DEBUG: data: 61 37 36 35 30 00 a7650. 2002-08-09 11:39:42 [10] DEBUG: Octet string dump ends. 2002-08-09 11:39:42 [10] DEBUG: Creating WDP 2002-08-09 11:39:42 [10] DEBUG: dumping user data= F@ 2002-08-09
RE: MMS PDU
Shouldn't the UDH be something like 0b 05 04 c34f c002 00 03 ff 02 01 This is the UDH for push messages at least.. Thanks, maria -Original Message- From: Aarno Syvänen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 August 2002 06:27 To: Maria Turk Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: MMS PDU Maria Turk kirjoittaa keskiviikkona, 31. heinäkuuta 2002, kello 14:19:Hi, Does anyone have an MMS PDU and UDH for mms notification that they know works and have tested it.. I want to test the MMS notification sent over SMS.. test/test_http http://localhost:13013/cgi- bin/sendsms?username=*''password=*'' to=*''udh=%06%05%04%0b%84%23%f0'' text=%0f%06%03%be%af%84%8c%82%98%39%39%39%35%40%66%6c%79%65%72%6f%6e%65%2e%6 3%6f%6d%00 %8d%90%8a%80%8e%01%64%88%06%80%04%3d%64%8d%80% 83%YourURI%00 A
RE: MMS PDU
Title: RE: MMS PDU m-notification.ind must be sent to port 0B84 (2948) but not to c34f (4) (see WAP-259-WDP Appendix B) -Original Message- From: Maria Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 12:05 PM To: 'Aarno Syvanen'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: MMS PDU Shouldn't the UDH be something like 0b 05 04 c34f c002 00 03 ff 02 01 This is the UDH for push messages at least.. Thanks, maria -Original Message- From: Aarno Syvänen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 August 2002 06:27 To: Maria Turk Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: MMS PDU Maria Turk kirjoittaa keskiviikkona, 31. heinäkuuta 2002, kello 14:19:Hi, Does anyone have an MMS PDU and UDH for mms notification that they know works and have tested it.. I want to test the MMS notification sent over SMS.. test/test_http http://localhost:13013/cgi- bin/sendsms?username=*''password=*'' to=*''udh=%06%05%04%0b%84%23%f0'' text=%0f%06%03%be%af%84%8c%82%98%39%39%39%35%40%66%6c%79%65%72 %6f%6e%65%2e%6 3%6f%6d%00 %8d%90%8a%80%8e%01%64%88%06%80%04%3d%64%8d%80% 83%YourURI%00 A
RE: MMS PDU
Title: RE: MMS PDU So the UDH for an MMS notification looks like 0b 05 040b84 c002 00 03 ff 02 01.. what does the PDU of the notification look like.?? Maria -Original Message-From: Igor Ivoilov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 01 August 2002 10:26To: 'Maria Turk'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: MMS PDU m-notification.ind must be sent to port 0B84 (2948) but not to c34f (4) (see WAP-259-WDP Appendix B) -Original Message- From: Maria Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 12:05 PM To: 'Aarno Syvanen'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: MMS PDU Shouldn't the UDH be something like 0b 05 04 c34f c002 00 03 ff 02 01 This is the UDH for push messages at least.. Thanks, maria -Original Message- From: Aarno Syvänen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 August 2002 06:27 To: Maria Turk Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: MMS PDU Maria Turk kirjoittaa keskiviikkona, 31. heinäkuuta 2002, kello 14:19:Hi, Does anyone have an MMS PDU and UDH for mms notification that they know works and have tested it.. I want to test the MMS notification sent over SMS.. test/test_http http://localhost:13013/cgi- bin/sendsms?username=*''password=*'' to=*''udh=%06%05%04%0b%84%23%f0'' text=%0f%06%03%be%af%84%8c%82%98%39%39%39%35%40%66%6c%79%65%72 %6f%6e%65%2e%6 3%6f%6d%00 %8d%90%8a%80%8e%01%64%88%06%80%04%3d%64%8d%80% 83%YourURI%00 A
MMS PDU
Hi, Does anyone have an MMS PDU and UDH for mms notification that they know works and have tested it.. I want to test the MMS notification sent over SMS.. Thanks, Maria
Re: MMS PDU
Maria Turk kirjoittaa keskiviikkona, 31. heinäkuuta 2002, kello 14:19:Hi, Does anyone have an MMS PDU and UDH for mms notification that they know works and have tested it.. I want to test the MMS notification sent over SMS.. test/test_http http://localhost:13013/cgi- bin/sendsms?username=*''password=*'' to=*''udh=%06%05%04%0b%84%23%f0'' text=%0f%06%03%be%af%84%8c%82%98%39%39%39%35%40%66%6c%79%65%72%6f%6e%65%2e%63%6f%6d%00 %8d%90%8a%80%8e%01%64%88%06%80%04%3d%64%8d%80% 83%YourURI%00 A