Re: Booting Fedora from LVM with grub2
Adam Williamson wrote on 27.03.2012 20:14: [...] It's worth bearing in mind there's a giant anaconda UI rewrite still pending, which entirely redesigns the storage configuration GUI. One of the other major changes is that it makes all installations kickstart-driven. The GUI will just produce a kickstart file, which anaconda will then process to perform the actual install. Just out of curiosity: Your description makes me assume that the installer in the future still don't do things like partitioning, formating or installing a basic set of packages in the background while the user (which has a high latency/response time) is asked questions about the root password to use, users accounts to create or which timezone the system is in? Just wondering, because the Ubuntu installer does things like that, which makes the installation a little bit quicker. CU knurd -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Fedora Software Center - an update
- Original Message - Hello devel list, Hi! a few months ago I expressed my interest in porting the Ubuntu Software Center to Fedora, integrating the AppStream infrastructure for application metadata in our repository system. Unfortunately, for a variety of reasons, since have stalled ever since and, although experimental Fedora support exists in upstream software-center sources, no rpm package is available, and neither work on yum / repodata / pkgdb integration was started. What is more, I'm now forced to reconsider my occupations and therefore I must say I'm not interested in working on this, short term. This may change a few months in the future, but for the time being I won't be doing any further development work. This means that I'm not going to propose the feature for F18. Of course, if any of you wants to volounteer, that would be great (this feature is still needed, if we want to reach the greater public). All my code is publicy available, and if you need any help to reach the same point as me (this screenshot [1]), just contact me privately. I was talking to Michal Hrusecky during the Developer Conference, the OpenSUSE Boosters guy and they are trying to make this effort more widespread among distributions. He asked me for a interested contacts in Fedora, so now I found one :) So it's probably worth to contact him (I can provide the contact if you wish). Jaroslav Sorry for not being able to complete this, and thanks a lot for your time and attention, Giovanni [1] https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/339631_2220549998711_1396501732_31869785_1029708027_o.jpg -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
File IO-Socket-SSL-1.62.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by pghmcfc
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-IO-Socket-SSL: a0faa586626cd67270e9a7e7410175b4 IO-Socket-SSL-1.62.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Re: F16: Kernel bug with USB disks ?
2012/3/28 Terry Barnaby ter...@beam.ltd.uk On 03/26/2012 09:20 PM, J. Randall Owens wrote: On 03/26/2012 06:05 AM, Terry Barnaby wrote: Hi, I am using the latest F16 kernel: 3.3.0-4.fc16.i686.PAE and am having problems with a MicroSD card connected to a USB card reader. This has been working fine until recently (at least in F14 on the same hardware). The problem is that umount does not appear to be working correctly. I have an ext3 file system on the card. I can mount it, and I can copy files to it. However when I use the umount ... command it returns instantly (should sync the files to the card). The system says the card is unmounted (at least it is not listed with mount, df etc). However if I run sync, there is a lot of disk activity to the card ... Also if I try and run mkfs it says the device in in use ... If I mount a blank card it lists the files present on the previous card ... This sounds like a nasty kernel bug ... Anyone else seen this ? I thought I'd noticed something like this with 3.2.x kernels also; I couldn't narrow it down more than that. In my case, it's a USB external HDD. After unmounting, I have an old habit of running 3 syncs in one line. And lately, I've noticed that I don't even get that disk activity until I give it a second trio of syncs, which certainly doesn't seem right. Let me check right now with 3.3.0-4... Odd, now I do get the activity at about the same time as the umount, and no further activity when I issue the syncs. Seems to be the opposite of what you've reported. Kernel 3.2.10-3.fc16.i686.PAE also appears to be broken. This seems really very nasty, does it apply to other disks or just to USB ones ... I have added Bugzilla bug: 806909 for this. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806909 Cheers Terry -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel I just commented your bugreport with mine that submitted some months ago -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
[Bug 807613] perl-Socket-2.001 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807613 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|mmasl...@redhat.com,| |ppi...@redhat.com | --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com 2012-03-28 07:31:33 EDT --- Bug-fix release. It will into all Fedora releases having 2.000 now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
F-17 Branched report: 20120328 changes
Compose started at Wed Mar 28 08:15:04 UTC 2012 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [HippoDraw] HippoDraw-devel-1.21.3-2.fc17.i686 requires python-numarray HippoDraw-devel-1.21.3-2.fc17.x86_64 requires python-numarray HippoDraw-python-1.21.3-2.fc17.x86_64 requires python-numarray [aeolus-conductor] aeolus-conductor-0.4.0-2.fc17.noarch requires ruby(abi) = 0:1.8 [aeolus-configserver] aeolus-configserver-0.4.1-5.fc17.noarch requires ruby-nokogiri [alexandria] alexandria-0.6.8-2.fc17.1.noarch requires ruby(abi) = 0:1.8 [catfish] catfish-engines-0.3.2-4.fc17.1.noarch requires pinot [comoonics-cdsl-py] comoonics-cdsl-py-0.2-19.noarch requires comoonics-base-py [comoonics-cluster-py] comoonics-cluster-py-0.1-25.noarch requires comoonics-base-py [contextkit] contextkit-0.5.15-2.fc15.i686 requires libcdb.so.1 contextkit-0.5.15-2.fc15.x86_64 requires libcdb.so.1()(64bit) [converseen] converseen-0.4.9-3.fc17.x86_64 requires libMagickWand.so.5()(64bit) converseen-0.4.9-3.fc17.x86_64 requires libMagickCore.so.5()(64bit) converseen-0.4.9-3.fc17.x86_64 requires libMagick++.so.5()(64bit) [dh-make] dh-make-0.55-4.fc17.noarch requires debhelper [eruby] eruby-1.0.5-17.fc17.x86_64 requires libruby.so.1.8()(64bit) eruby-libs-1.0.5-17.fc17.i686 requires ruby(abi) = 0:1.8 eruby-libs-1.0.5-17.fc17.i686 requires libruby.so.1.8 eruby-libs-1.0.5-17.fc17.x86_64 requires ruby(abi) = 0:1.8 eruby-libs-1.0.5-17.fc17.x86_64 requires libruby.so.1.8()(64bit) [gcc-python-plugin] gcc-python2-debug-plugin-0.9-1.fc17.x86_64 requires gcc = 0:4.7.0-0.10.fc17 gcc-python2-plugin-0.9-1.fc17.x86_64 requires gcc = 0:4.7.0-0.10.fc17 gcc-python3-debug-plugin-0.9-1.fc17.x86_64 requires gcc = 0:4.7.0-0.10.fc17 gcc-python3-plugin-0.9-1.fc17.x86_64 requires gcc = 0:4.7.0-0.10.fc17 [gearmand] gearmand-0.23-2.fc17.x86_64 requires libtcmalloc.so.0()(64bit) gearmand-0.23-2.fc17.x86_64 requires libmemcached.so.8()(64bit) gearmand-0.23-2.fc17.x86_64 requires libboost_program_options-mt.so.1.47.0()(64bit) [genius] genius-1.0.12-2.fc15.x86_64 requires libgmp.so.3()(64bit) gnome-genius-1.0.12-2.fc15.x86_64 requires libgmp.so.3()(64bit) [gnome-phone-manager] gnome-phone-manager-0.66-9.fc17.x86_64 requires libgnome-bluetooth.so.9()(64bit) [gnome-user-share] gnome-user-share-3.0.1-3.fc17.x86_64 requires libgnome-bluetooth.so.9()(64bit) [gorm] gorm-1.2.13-0.2.20110331.fc17.i686 requires libobjc.so.3 gorm-1.2.13-0.2.20110331.fc17.i686 requires libgnustep-gui.so.0.20 gorm-1.2.13-0.2.20110331.fc17.i686 requires libgnustep-base.so.1.23 gorm-1.2.13-0.2.20110331.fc17.x86_64 requires libobjc.so.3()(64bit) gorm-1.2.13-0.2.20110331.fc17.x86_64 requires libgnustep-gui.so.0.20()(64bit) gorm-1.2.13-0.2.20110331.fc17.x86_64 requires libgnustep-base.so.1.23()(64bit) [gscribble] gscribble-0.1.2-2.fc17.noarch requires gnome-python2-gtkhtml2 [i3] i3-4.0.1-2.fc17.x86_64 requires libxcb-property.so.1()(64bit) i3-4.0.1-2.fc17.x86_64 requires libxcb-keysyms.so.1()(64bit) i3-4.0.1-2.fc17.x86_64 requires libxcb-icccm.so.1()(64bit) i3-4.0.1-2.fc17.x86_64 requires libxcb-event.so.1()(64bit) i3-4.0.1-2.fc17.x86_64 requires libxcb-aux.so.0()(64bit) i3-4.0.1-2.fc17.x86_64 requires libxcb-atom.so.1()(64bit) [ibus-fep] ibus-fep-1.4.3-1.fc17.x86_64 requires libibus-1.0.so.0()(64bit) [ibus-gucharmap] ibus-gucharmap-1.4.0-3.fc17.x86_64 requires libibus-1.0.so.0()(64bit) [ibus-panel-extensions] ibus-panel-extensions-1.4.99.20111207-1.fc17.i686 requires libibus-1.0.so.0 ibus-panel-extensions-1.4.99.20111207-1.fc17.x86_64 requires libibus-1.0.so.0()(64bit) [ibus-unikey] ibus-unikey-0.6.1-1.fc17.x86_64 requires libibus-1.0.so.0()(64bit) [jboss-jaxrpc-1.1-api] jboss-jaxrpc-1.1-api-1.0.1-0.1.20120309gita3c227.fc17.noarch requires jboss-servlet-3.0-api [kazehakase] kazehakase-ruby-0.5.8-11.svn3873_trunk.fc17.x86_64 requires ruby(abi) = 0:1.8 kazehakase-ruby-0.5.8-11.svn3873_trunk.fc17.x86_64 requires libruby.so.1.8()(64bit) [libprelude] 1:libprelude-ruby-1.0.0-11.fc17.x86_64 requires ruby(abi) = 0:1.8 1:libprelude-ruby-1.0.0-11.fc17.x86_64 requires libruby.so.1.8()(64bit) [libteam] libteam-0.1-3.20120130gitb5cf2a8.fc17.i686 requires libnl-route-3.so.199 libteam-0.1-3.20120130gitb5cf2a8.fc17.i686 requires libnl-nf-3.so.199 libteam-0.1-3.20120130gitb5cf2a8.fc17.i686 requires libnl-genl-3.so.199 libteam-0.1-3.20120130gitb5cf2a8.fc17.i686 requires libnl-cli-3.so.199 libteam-0.1-3.20120130gitb5cf2a8.fc17.i686 requires libnl-3.so.199 libteam-0.1-3.20120130gitb5cf2a8.fc17.x86_64
Re: Intent to retire: mod_python
On 03/26/2012 05:04 PM, Joe Orton wrote: Source : yawn-0-0.3.20120227svn561.fc18.src.rpm YAWN still needs mod_python. WSGI patch is welcome, YAWN is quite small script. Both maintainers are not skilled Pythonists, especially when it comes to HTTP services. Any volunteer? Jan -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: httpd 2.4 is coming, RFC on module packaging draft
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/27/2012 03:19 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: On 03/27/2012 05:15 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: I think removing the legacy cruft just for the goal of removing it is not helpful at all and is actually the main cause of half baked, half removed stuff in Fedora. Interesting how did you come to that conclusion? I assume that that mod_access_compat module only requires a few bytes, so I don't see why it should not be loaded by default forever (or at least as long as upstream supports it, which hopefully will be for the whole 2.4 cycle). Few bytes for mod_access_compat here, few bytes for something else there Of course, web app packages in Fedora itself SHOULD be updated to the new directives, but that's not a reason to gratuitously break the old ones. It's my experience that things dont seem to get fixed unless they are broken and what compat does is just delaying the inevitable... Those web app maintainers that actually bother to monitor upstream have already made the necessary changes to their relevant component and did so as soon as 2.4 got release and probably are just waiting until we start shipping 2.4. It's those that dont and they will drag their feets in doing so until that compatibility is removed... JBG Joe, I am not sure how this effects SELinux labeling, if it does at all. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk9zCnIACgkQrlYvE4MpobO+TwCg5vmaymeSPFTnGYMuhcPGsaOG G0IAnRWrJ1zyyn6lvffkb1kzbb2UdCGu =VNnY -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Booting Fedora from LVM with grub2
Am 28.03.2012 09:25, schrieb Thorsten Leemhuis: Adam Williamson wrote on 27.03.2012 20:14: [...] It's worth bearing in mind there's a giant anaconda UI rewrite still pending, which entirely redesigns the storage configuration GUI. One of the other major changes is that it makes all installations kickstart-driven. The GUI will just produce a kickstart file, which anaconda will then process to perform the actual install. Just out of curiosity: Your description makes me assume that the installer in the future still don't do things like partitioning, formating or installing a basic set of packages in the background while the user (which has a high latency/response time) is asked questions about the root password to use, users accounts to create or which timezone the system is in? if this ever happens anaconda has to be considered as broken by design the currently active bugs has to be fixed instead remove capabilities at all * no way to make /boot as RAID1 without noefi-kernel-param there has to be really a clear useable option to have /boot and / as RAID1 without any bios/efi-partition around - if a disk dies in a RAID1 the machine has to be bottable or considered as broken by design for endusers have to call me for support * if i ceate 3 partitions i xcpect that they get /dev/sda1 /dev/sad2 /dev/sda3 in exactly the order i create them instead switch the second one to /dev/sda1 after create the third signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
libmicrohttpd / gnutls / openvas
libmicrohttpd seems to be broken due gnutls changes and was not rebuilt for decades as also the autotests are disabled in the src.rpm _ * so simply rebuild the F15 version does not fix it * rebuild the F16 package does not fix it * update to 0.9.15 does not fix it * update to 0.9.15 would kill my goal is get Greenbone Security Assistant (GSA) 2.0.1 running again after upgrade to F16 http://www.openvas.org/install-source.html who is responsible for this? there are 2 fedora and one external package involved i see also in the (few) fedora-openvas packages disable gnutls pacth, enable gnutls patch multiple times _ http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=6900 http://lists.wald.intevation.org/pipermail/openvas-discuss/2011-November/003613.html https://gnunet.org/bugs/view.php?id=1619 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: ImageMagick update coming to 6.7.6-5 (.so.5)
On 03/25/2012 01:20 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: 24.03.2012 02:18, Orion Poplawski wrote: On 03/23/2012 02:11 PM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: I want push now builds perl-GD-SecurityImage-1.71-3.fc17 techne-0.2.1-4.fc17 gdl-0.9.2-5.fc17 calibre-0.8.39-1.fc17 autotrace-0.31.1-29.fc17.1 ImageMagick-6.7.5.6-3.fc17 with tat build overrides but got error from bodhi what ImageMagick-6.7.5.6-3.fc17 update already exists. Should I delete it first and unpushing is not enough? You can edit it and adds builds. You may have to be a proven packager or a co-maintainer to submit an update though. Others will have to confirm. No, I still can't edit it because got errors: hubbitus does not have commit access to perl-GD-SecurityImage hubbitus does not have commit access to techne I have not provenpackager rights indeed. I kindly ask FESCO to grant its me, but it not in that moment in any case. If I had them, I could compile all the packages on their own, without asking anyone. Please could you say how I may push such update now? May someone help with it if my rights is not enough? If you delete the update, I can submit a batch update. I have provenpackager rights. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.nwra.com -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: ImageMagick update coming to 6.7.6-5 (.so.5)
28.03.2012 19:23, Orion Poplawski написал: On 03/25/2012 01:20 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: 24.03.2012 02:18, Orion Poplawski wrote: On 03/23/2012 02:11 PM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: I want push now builds perl-GD-SecurityImage-1.71-3.fc17 techne-0.2.1-4.fc17 gdl-0.9.2-5.fc17 calibre-0.8.39-1.fc17 autotrace-0.31.1-29.fc17.1 ImageMagick-6.7.5.6-3.fc17 with tat build overrides but got error from bodhi what ImageMagick-6.7.5.6-3.fc17 update already exists. Should I delete it first and unpushing is not enough? You can edit it and adds builds. You may have to be a proven packager or a co-maintainer to submit an update though. Others will have to confirm. No, I still can't edit it because got errors: hubbitus does not have commit access to perl-GD-SecurityImage hubbitus does not have commit access to techne I have not provenpackager rights indeed. I kindly ask FESCO to grant its me, but it not in that moment in any case. If I had them, I could compile all the packages on their own, without asking anyone. Please could you say how I may push such update now? May someone help with it if my rights is not enough? If you delete the update, I can submit a batch update. I have provenpackager rights. It will be very-very helpful and desired. But maybe you could just edit this update? -- With best wishes, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus). For fast contact with me use jabber: hubbi...@jabber.ru -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: ImageMagick update coming to 6.7.6-5 (.so.5)
On 03/28/2012 09:36 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: 28.03.2012 19:23, Orion Poplawski написал: On 03/25/2012 01:20 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: 24.03.2012 02:18, Orion Poplawski wrote: On 03/23/2012 02:11 PM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: I want push now builds perl-GD-SecurityImage-1.71-3.fc17 techne-0.2.1-4.fc17 gdl-0.9.2-5.fc17 calibre-0.8.39-1.fc17 autotrace-0.31.1-29.fc17.1 ImageMagick-6.7.5.6-3.fc17 with tat build overrides but got error from bodhi what ImageMagick-6.7.5.6-3.fc17 update already exists. Should I delete it first and unpushing is not enough? You can edit it and adds builds. You may have to be a proven packager or a co-maintainer to submit an update though. Others will have to confirm. No, I still can't edit it because got errors: hubbitus does not have commit access to perl-GD-SecurityImage hubbitus does not have commit access to techne I have not provenpackager rights indeed. I kindly ask FESCO to grant its me, but it not in that moment in any case. If I had them, I could compile all the packages on their own, without asking anyone. Please could you say how I may push such update now? May someone help with it if my rights is not enough? If you delete the update, I can submit a batch update. I have provenpackager rights. It will be very-very helpful and desired. But maybe you could just edit this update? Apparently I cannot do that. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.nwra.com -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
File Term-ReadLine-Perl-1.0303.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by ppisar
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Term-ReadLine-Perl: a77ecf4921cc714820fef898c6cb0eaf Term-ReadLine-Perl-1.0303.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Term-ReadLine-Perl] Import
commit bfb1aab35e6370680313b4f50052749b86a5bf3a
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Mar 28 18:05:02 2012 +0200
Import
.gitignore |1 +
.rpmlint |2 +
perl-Term-ReadLine-Perl.spec | 49 ++
sources |1 +
4 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index e69de29..eb22efb 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+/Term-ReadLine-Perl-1.0303.tar.gz
diff --git a/.rpmlint b/.rpmlint
new file mode 100644
index 000..ad8a1a8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.rpmlint
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+from Config import *
+addFilter(spelling-error .* (conformant|ReadKey));
diff --git a/perl-Term-ReadLine-Perl.spec b/perl-Term-ReadLine-Perl.spec
new file mode 100644
index 000..cc2f7b5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/perl-Term-ReadLine-Perl.spec
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
+Name: perl-Term-ReadLine-Perl
+Version:1.0303
+Release:1%{?dist}
+Summary:Readline implementation in Perl
+License:GPL+ or Artistic
+Group: Development/Libraries
+URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/Term-ReadLine-Perl/
+Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/I/IL/ILYAZ/modules/Term-ReadLine-Perl-%{version}.tar.gz
+BuildArch: noarch
+BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
+# Term::Cap is optional
+# Run-time
+BuildRequires: perl(Carp)
+BuildRequires: perl(SelfLoader)
+BuildRequires: perl(Term::ReadKey)
+Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo
$version))
+Requires: perl(Term::ReadKey)
+
+%description
+This is a quick implementation of the minimal interface to Readline libraries.
+The implementation is made in Perl (mostly) by Jeffrey Friedl. The only thing
+this library does is to make it conformant (and add some minimal changes, like
+using Term::ReadKey if present, and correct work under xterm).
+
+%prep
+%setup -q -n Term-ReadLine-Perl-%{version}
+chmod -x ReadLine/*.pm CHANGES README
+
+%build
+%{__perl} Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor
+make %{?_smp_mflags}
+
+%install
+make pure_install PERL_INSTALL_ROOT=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
+find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} \;
+find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} 2/dev/null \;
+%{_fixperms} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/*
+
+%check
+# Disable interractive tests
+AUTOMATED_TESTING=1 make test
+
+%files
+%doc CHANGES README
+%{perl_vendorlib}/*
+
+%changelog
+* Thu Mar 15 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com 1.0303-1
+- Specfile autogenerated by cpanspec 1.78.
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index e69de29..ea82dd4 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+a77ecf4921cc714820fef898c6cb0eaf Term-ReadLine-Perl-1.0303.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 802986] perl-Debug-Client-0.18 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802986 Bug 802986 depends on bug 803798, which changed state. Bug 803798 Summary: Review Request: perl-Term-ReadLine-Perl - Readline implementation in Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=803798 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Re: ImageMagick update coming to 6.7.6-5 (.so.5)
On 03/28/2012 10:01 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: 28.03.2012 19:42, Orion Poplawski написал: On 03/28/2012 09:36 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: 28.03.2012 19:23, Orion Poplawski написал: On 03/25/2012 01:20 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: 24.03.2012 02:18, Orion Poplawski wrote: On 03/23/2012 02:11 PM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: I want push now builds perl-GD-SecurityImage-1.71-3.fc17 techne-0.2.1-4.fc17 gdl-0.9.2-5.fc17 calibre-0.8.39-1.fc17 autotrace-0.31.1-29.fc17.1 ImageMagick-6.7.5.6-3.fc17 with tat build overrides but got error from bodhi what ImageMagick-6.7.5.6-3.fc17 update already exists. Should I delete it first and unpushing is not enough? You can edit it and adds builds. You may have to be a proven packager or a co-maintainer to submit an update though. Others will have to confirm. No, I still can't edit it because got errors: hubbitus does not have commit access to perl-GD-SecurityImage hubbitus does not have commit access to techne I have not provenpackager rights indeed. I kindly ask FESCO to grant its me, but it not in that moment in any case. If I had them, I could compile all the packages on their own, without asking anyone. Please could you say how I may push such update now? May someone help with it if my rights is not enough? If you delete the update, I can submit a batch update. I have provenpackager rights. It will be very-very helpful and desired. But maybe you could just edit this update? Apparently I cannot do that. Ok, deleted ImageMagick-6.7.5.6-3.fc17 update. Please be so kind push new one. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/techne-0.2.1-4.fc17,gdl-0.9.2-5.fc17,autotrace-0.31.1-29.fc17.1,ImageMagick-6.7.5.6-3.fc17 There were already calibre and pfstools updates so I couldn't add them. Let me know if there are other builds that need to be added. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.nwra.com -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: ImageMagick update coming to 6.7.6-5 (.so.5)
28.03.2012 20:17, Orion Poplawski написал: On 03/28/2012 10:01 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: 28.03.2012 19:42, Orion Poplawski написал: On 03/28/2012 09:36 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: 28.03.2012 19:23, Orion Poplawski написал: On 03/25/2012 01:20 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: 24.03.2012 02:18, Orion Poplawski wrote: On 03/23/2012 02:11 PM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: I want push now builds perl-GD-SecurityImage-1.71-3.fc17 techne-0.2.1-4.fc17 gdl-0.9.2-5.fc17 calibre-0.8.39-1.fc17 autotrace-0.31.1-29.fc17.1 ImageMagick-6.7.5.6-3.fc17 with tat build overrides but got error from bodhi what ImageMagick-6.7.5.6-3.fc17 update already exists. Should I delete it first and unpushing is not enough? You can edit it and adds builds. You may have to be a proven packager or a co-maintainer to submit an update though. Others will have to confirm. No, I still can't edit it because got errors: hubbitus does not have commit access to perl-GD-SecurityImage hubbitus does not have commit access to techne I have not provenpackager rights indeed. I kindly ask FESCO to grant its me, but it not in that moment in any case. If I had them, I could compile all the packages on their own, without asking anyone. Please could you say how I may push such update now? May someone help with it if my rights is not enough? If you delete the update, I can submit a batch update. I have provenpackager rights. It will be very-very helpful and desired. But maybe you could just edit this update? Apparently I cannot do that. Ok, deleted ImageMagick-6.7.5.6-3.fc17 update. Please be so kind push new one. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/techne-0.2.1-4.fc17,gdl-0.9.2-5.fc17,autotrace-0.31.1-29.fc17.1,ImageMagick-6.7.5.6-3.fc17 There were already calibre and pfstools updates so I couldn't add them. Let me know if there are other builds that need to be added. Thank you very much! But perl-GD-SecurityImage-1.71-3.fc17 shouldn't be there also? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: ImageMagick update coming to 6.7.6-5 (.so.5)
On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 10:17:30 -0600 Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com wrote: On 03/28/2012 10:01 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: 28.03.2012 19:42, Orion Poplawski написал: On 03/28/2012 09:36 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: 28.03.2012 19:23, Orion Poplawski написал: On 03/25/2012 01:20 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: 24.03.2012 02:18, Orion Poplawski wrote: On 03/23/2012 02:11 PM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: I want push now builds perl-GD-SecurityImage-1.71-3.fc17 techne-0.2.1-4.fc17 gdl-0.9.2-5.fc17 calibre-0.8.39-1.fc17 autotrace-0.31.1-29.fc17.1 ImageMagick-6.7.5.6-3.fc17 with tat build overrides but got error from bodhi what ImageMagick-6.7.5.6-3.fc17 update already exists. Should I delete it first and unpushing is not enough? You can edit it and adds builds. You may have to be a proven packager or a co-maintainer to submit an update though. Others will have to confirm. No, I still can't edit it because got errors: hubbitus does not have commit access to perl-GD-SecurityImage hubbitus does not have commit access to techne I have not provenpackager rights indeed. I kindly ask FESCO to grant its me, but it not in that moment in any case. If I had them, I could compile all the packages on their own, without asking anyone. Please could you say how I may push such update now? May someone help with it if my rights is not enough? If you delete the update, I can submit a batch update. I have provenpackager rights. It will be very-very helpful and desired. But maybe you could just edit this update? Apparently I cannot do that. Ok, deleted ImageMagick-6.7.5.6-3.fc17 update. Please be so kind push new one. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/techne-0.2.1-4.fc17,gdl-0.9.2-5.fc17,autotrace-0.31.1-29.fc17.1,ImageMagick-6.7.5.6-3.fc17 There were already calibre and pfstools updates so I couldn't add them. Let me know if there are other builds that need to be added. I unpushed the calibre one. Please add it. kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: ImageMagick update coming to 6.7.6-5 (.so.5)
On 03/28/2012 10:24 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: 28.03.2012 20:17, Orion Poplawski написал: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/techne-0.2.1-4.fc17,gdl-0.9.2-5.fc17,autotrace-0.31.1-29.fc17.1,ImageMagick-6.7.5.6-3.fc17 There were already calibre and pfstools updates so I couldn't add them. Let me know if there are other builds that need to be added. Thank you very much! But perl-GD-SecurityImage-1.71-3.fc17 shouldn't be there also? Added. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.nwra.com -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Booting Fedora from LVM with grub2
Am 28.03.2012 17:58, schrieb Jared K. Smith: On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 4:16 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: if this ever happens anaconda has to be considered as broken by design Harald, I've tried to be patient with your recent posts to the devel list, but you don't seem to get the message (or you're actively choosing to ignore it), so I'm going to say it again as clearly as I can. The universe of Fedora development doesn't revolve around you. Development involves a fair amount of group consensus, but as in any meritocracy -- people are more likely to have their opinions valued and listened to when they're willing to take an active role in the process, rather than playing Monday-morning quarterback (an American term, sorry) or complaining about things after the fact. sorry but WHY do you strip the context of my message Richard W.M. Jones wrote: Perhaps, like Ubuntu's installer, the graphical part of Anaconda should concentrate on doing the simple stuff, and leave everything else to kickstart non-graphical installations this would mean you have from DVD only a click, click default install and for every setup wihich is not default you have to deal with kickstart do you really think this is a good idea and improvement of the installer in any way? complaining about things after the fact and that is why i wrote the mail to not complain AFTER the fact like systemd last year - i do not really understand your problem with this message of me in the context - really! signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: ImageMagick update coming to 6.7.6-5 (.so.5)
Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com writes: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/techne-0.2.1-4.fc17,gdl-0.9.2-5.fc17,autotrace-0.31.1-29.fc17.1,ImageMagick-6.7.5.6-3.fc17 There were already calibre and pfstools updates so I couldn't add them. Let me know if there are other builds that need to be added. emacs-24.0.94-3.fc17 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
libcups.so.2 missing from cups-libs in rawhide
Bug already filed: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807767 Might not be cups-specific, as the corresponding f17 cups-libs does provide libcups.so.2. -J -- in your fear, seek only peace in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Booting Fedora from LVM with grub2
On 03/28/2012 09:46 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: and that is why i wrote the mail to not complain AFTER the fact like systemd last year - i do not really understand your problem with this message of me in the context - really! You keep ranting based on assumptions. Someone has asked a question. Just wait for a reply first. Don't pile on top. Before pressing send, reread to make sure you don't appear to be demanding and shouting. You continue to behave in a obnoxious way in the users list as well as others have pointed out there too. Rahul -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: ImageMagick update coming to 6.7.6-5 (.so.5)
On 03/28/2012 10:25 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 10:17:30 -0600 Orion Poplawskior...@cora.nwra.com wrote: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/techne-0.2.1-4.fc17,gdl-0.9.2-5.fc17,autotrace-0.31.1-29.fc17.1,ImageMagick-6.7.5.6-3.fc17 There were already calibre and pfstools updates so I couldn't add them. Let me know if there are other builds that need to be added. I unpushed the calibre one. Please add it. kevin Done. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.nwra.com -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: ImageMagick update coming to 6.7.6-5 (.so.5)
On 03/28/2012 10:33 AM, Karel Klíč wrote: Orion Poplawskior...@cora.nwra.com writes: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/techne-0.2.1-4.fc17,gdl-0.9.2-5.fc17,autotrace-0.31.1-29.fc17.1,ImageMagick-6.7.5.6-3.fc17 There were already calibre and pfstools updates so I couldn't add them. Let me know if there are other builds that need to be added. emacs-24.0.94-3.fc17 Done. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.nwra.com -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
[Bug 807793] New: Please build pcsc-perl for EPEL6
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please build pcsc-perl for EPEL6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807793 Summary: Please build pcsc-perl for EPEL6 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: pcsc-perl AssignedTo: tm...@redhat.com ReportedBy: mjean...@rlnx.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: tm...@redhat.com, fedora-perl-devel-l...@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Hi, I was hoping that you could build pcsc-perl for EPEL6. I just tried a scratch build of the fc17 version and it builds without modification within EPEL6. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3940535 Thanks, Michael -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
koji build failing.
A package that was just building yesterday doesn't seem to build anymore because of libcups.so.2(). Here is part of the root.log. Getting requirements for jboss-web-7.0.13-3.fc18.src DEBUG util.py:257: -- jpackage-utils-1.7.5-17.fc18.x86_64 DEBUG util.py:257: -- 1:java-1.7.0-openjdk-devel-1.7.0.3-2.1.fc18.4.x86_64 DEBUG util.py:257: -- jboss-annotations-1.1-api-1.0.1-0.1.20120212git76e1a2.fc18.noarch DEBUG util.py:257: -- jboss-el-2.2-api-1.0.1-0.2.20120212git2fabd8.fc18.noarch DEBUG util.py:257: -- jboss-jsp-2.2-api-1.0.1-3.fc18.noarch DEBUG util.py:257: -- jboss-servlet-3.0-api-1.0.1-1.fc18.noarch DEBUG util.py:257: -- ant-1.8.3-1.fc18.noarch DEBUG util.py:257: -- junit-4.10-4.fc17.noarch DEBUG util.py:257: -- 1:ecj-3.4.2-11.fc17.x86_64 DEBUG util.py:257: Error: Package: gtk2-2.24.10-1.fc17.x86_64 (build) DEBUG util.py:257: Requires: libcups.so.2()(64bit) DEBUG util.py:257: You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem DEBUG util.py:257: You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest DEBUG util.py:347: Child returncode was: 1 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: koji build failing.
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Anthony Sasadeusz sasad...@umbc.edu wrote: A package that was just building yesterday doesn't seem to build anymore because of libcups.so.2(). Here is part of the root.log. Getting requirements for jboss-web-7.0.13-3.fc18.src DEBUG util.py:257: -- jpackage-utils-1.7.5-17.fc18.x86_64 DEBUG util.py:257: -- 1:java-1.7.0-openjdk-devel-1.7.0.3-2.1.fc18.4.x86_64 DEBUG util.py:257: -- jboss-annotations-1.1-api-1.0.1-0.1.20120212git76e1a2.fc18.noarch DEBUG util.py:257: -- jboss-el-2.2-api-1.0.1-0.2.20120212git2fabd8.fc18.noarch DEBUG util.py:257: -- jboss-jsp-2.2-api-1.0.1-3.fc18.noarch DEBUG util.py:257: -- jboss-servlet-3.0-api-1.0.1-1.fc18.noarch DEBUG util.py:257: -- ant-1.8.3-1.fc18.noarch DEBUG util.py:257: -- junit-4.10-4.fc17.noarch DEBUG util.py:257: -- 1:ecj-3.4.2-11.fc17.x86_64 DEBUG util.py:257: Error: Package: gtk2-2.24.10-1.fc17.x86_64 (build) DEBUG util.py:257: Requires: libcups.so.2()(64bit) DEBUG util.py:257: You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem DEBUG util.py:257: You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest DEBUG util.py:347: Child returncode was: 1 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Bug filed: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807767 -J -- in your fear, seek only peace in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: koji build failing.
On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 13:27:57 -0500 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Anthony Sasadeusz sasad...@umbc.edu wrote: A package that was just building yesterday doesn't seem to build anymore because of libcups.so.2(). Here is part of the root.log. Getting requirements for jboss-web-7.0.13-3.fc18.src DEBUG util.py:257: -- jpackage-utils-1.7.5-17.fc18.x86_64 DEBUG util.py:257: -- 1:java-1.7.0-openjdk-devel-1.7.0.3-2.1.fc18.4.x86_64 DEBUG util.py:257: -- jboss-annotations-1.1-api-1.0.1-0.1.20120212git76e1a2.fc18.noarch DEBUG util.py:257: -- jboss-el-2.2-api-1.0.1-0.2.20120212git2fabd8.fc18.noarch DEBUG util.py:257: -- jboss-jsp-2.2-api-1.0.1-3.fc18.noarch DEBUG util.py:257: -- jboss-servlet-3.0-api-1.0.1-1.fc18.noarch DEBUG util.py:257: -- ant-1.8.3-1.fc18.noarch DEBUG util.py:257: -- junit-4.10-4.fc17.noarch DEBUG util.py:257: -- 1:ecj-3.4.2-11.fc17.x86_64 DEBUG util.py:257: Error: Package: gtk2-2.24.10-1.fc17.x86_64 (build) DEBUG util.py:257: Requires: libcups.so.2()(64bit) DEBUG util.py:257: You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem DEBUG util.py:257: You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest DEBUG util.py:347: Child returncode was: 1 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Bug filed: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807767 I untagged this build from the buildroot and mailed the owner(s). kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: httpd 2.4 is coming, RFC on module packaging draft
On 03/28/2012 12:56 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: Joe, I am not sure how this effects SELinux labeling, if it does at all. Afaikt this does not affect selinux in anyway since these are configuration syntax changes for the most part. If we take this example which is common as an default in various web applications... What used to be... Directory /var/www/example Options Indexes FollowSymLinks Order allow,deny Allow from all /Directory Will become...|| Directory /var/www/example Options Indexes FollowSymLinks Require all granted /Directory etc... So what we as an project will need to do, is to update our documentation and maintainers will have to update default apache configuration to reflect the new configuration syntax for the application/package they maintain. Administrators will have to updated their apache configuration(s) accordingly and or install the mod_access_compat module. The new api changes can be found here [1]. JBG http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/developer/new_api_2_4.html -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: koji build failing.
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 13:27:57 -0500 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Anthony Sasadeusz sasad...@umbc.edu wrote: A package that was just building yesterday doesn't seem to build anymore because of libcups.so.2(). Here is part of the root.log. Getting requirements for jboss-web-7.0.13-3.fc18.src DEBUG util.py:257: -- jpackage-utils-1.7.5-17.fc18.x86_64 DEBUG util.py:257: -- 1:java-1.7.0-openjdk-devel-1.7.0.3-2.1.fc18.4.x86_64 DEBUG util.py:257: -- jboss-annotations-1.1-api-1.0.1-0.1.20120212git76e1a2.fc18.noarch DEBUG util.py:257: -- jboss-el-2.2-api-1.0.1-0.2.20120212git2fabd8.fc18.noarch DEBUG util.py:257: -- jboss-jsp-2.2-api-1.0.1-3.fc18.noarch DEBUG util.py:257: -- jboss-servlet-3.0-api-1.0.1-1.fc18.noarch DEBUG util.py:257: -- ant-1.8.3-1.fc18.noarch DEBUG util.py:257: -- junit-4.10-4.fc17.noarch DEBUG util.py:257: -- 1:ecj-3.4.2-11.fc17.x86_64 DEBUG util.py:257: Error: Package: gtk2-2.24.10-1.fc17.x86_64 (build) DEBUG util.py:257: Requires: libcups.so.2()(64bit) DEBUG util.py:257: You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem DEBUG util.py:257: You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest DEBUG util.py:347: Child returncode was: 1 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Bug filed: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807767 I untagged this build from the buildroot and mailed the owner(s). Thank you, my build worked, I expect others will now. -J kevin -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- in your fear, seek only peace in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
[Help Wanted]Build error on aplus-fsf
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hallo, I have some issues to build aplus-fsf via mock for the master branch. Because I don't have any idea to selve the existing issues, I have uploaded the build.log, the SPEC file and a patch to http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/aplus-fsf/ It will be nice, if anyone can get a look on it to give me a hint to solve the build errors. Best Regards: Jochen Schmitt -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iJwEAQECAAYFAk9zYDEACgkQZLAIBz9lVu+9IwQA0bjsWNoadsvX0hT4jPKzwNEF NIwn6gwiUGY0J6qOez60OP5GSuCF2xvKd912Rixo7iaUYIlDxKL7mFMbrPwTvkGd aLWixtYMX/338k13v4iGJFdG0oj2EioUH9exNhcKAFT9MImWxzCKN+hrmK4dt0X0 jfTVTU2knaMUuX+eFy0= =yj7Z -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Booting Fedora from LVM with grub2
Am 28.03.2012 18:55, schrieb Rahul Sundaram: On 03/28/2012 09:46 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: and that is why i wrote the mail to not complain AFTER the fact like systemd last year - i do not really understand your problem with this message of me in the context - really! You keep ranting based on assumptions. Someone has asked a question. Just wait for a reply first. ah - i am not permitted to say my opinion of a very very bad idea before i become green light - from whom does this green light come and how is it marked that i see it next time? Don't pile on top. Before pressing send, reread to make sure you don't appear to be demanding and shouting. You continue to behave in a obnoxious way in the users list as well as others have pointed out there too. can you please quote what extactly was obnoxious the last days? seems for me that some people are really over sensitive was it this? if yes - why? you need first to understand: http://slacksite.com/other/ftp.html most clients these days are using PASV because active ftp will not work if the client is behind a router which has to forward random ports, so you have to configure the packet-filter on the server as follows ___ /etc/sysconfig/iptables-config is your friend if your machine is behind a NAT router: IPTABLES_MODULES=nf_conntrack_ftp nf_nat_ftp if your machine has as public IP: IPTABLES_MODULES=nf_conntrack_ftp or was it this? if yes - why? usually bash writes down .bash_history on close try it out with cat ~/.bash_history and you will not see the entries of your current session! so if you have more than one bash-instance open all of them writing down their history and the last one wins if you mean the ONE theard with Joe Zeff after his not all people are using GNOME in context of system-config-* - sorry, but these are default tools of fedora since forever and sometimes one is reaching a point where i consider him as not smart to say it polite signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Booting Fedora from LVM with grub2
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: sorry but WHY do you strip the context of my message Because my reply wasn't about the content of your message. My reply was all about the *tone* of your email. I know that language barrier is part of the problem here, but the tone of your email messages often comes across as demanding and condescending. -- Jared Smith -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: httpd-mmn related breakage in rawhide ?
On 03/28/2012 01:23 PM, Gabriel L. Somlo wrote: Hi, I'm trying to build a perl package which requires mod_perl in rawhide, and I'm getting this error in root.log: ... DEBUG util.py:257: httpd-mmn = 20120211 DEBUG util.py:257: Error: Package: mod_perl-2.0.5-8.fc18.x86_64 (build) DEBUG util.py:257: Requires: httpd-mmn = 20051115-x86-64 DEBUG util.py:257: Available: httpd-2.4.1-6.fc18.x86_64 (build) DEBUG util.py:257: httpd-mmn = 20120211-x86-64 DEBUG util.py:257: httpd-mmn = 20120211 DEBUG util.py:257: You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem DEBUG util.py:257: You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest DEBUG util.py:347: Child returncode was: 1 ... (see http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=3940694name=root.log for the full details). I also started receiving rawhide (f18) depcheck error reports on another package I own (mod_pubcookie) related to httpd-mmn. Is this a known transient problem currently percolating through rawhide, or rather something worthy of filing a bug ? Thanks, --G See the thread on httpd 2.4. Everything needs to be rebuilt and specs should be updated to new draft. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Booting Fedora from LVM with grub2
Am 28.03.2012 21:09, schrieb Jared K. Smith: On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: sorry but WHY do you strip the context of my message Because my reply wasn't about the content of your message. My reply was all about the *tone* of your email. there was simply NOTHING wrong in the tone of my mail because it is the same one i usually communicate with many people over more than 10 years about technical things and nobody has a problem exepct mailing lists maybe the tone was minimal rude because i do absolutely not understand why anyone can have the idea hey let us remove the whole custom partitioning and replace with kickstart only to solve problems with it well if i burn down the house my problem with a wrong color is solved, but i doubt it does not help really :-) I know that language barrier is part of the problem here, but the tone of your email messages often comes across as demanding and condescending. that may be your interpretation i only try to be clear and as specific as possible by pointing out for me very clear mistakes, bugs and wrong directions and if people starting to judge every single word because it does not fit their tone we drive far away from any sense maybe i have often not enough patience by people not understand what i try to tell them don't get me wrong, but after using Fedora since FC3 on servers and desktops, currently on more than 25 machines with all sort of things (multimedia, desktop, database, router, firewall, httpd, vpn, fileserver, voice-over-ip, dns, dhcp, ftp and some other services while develop all backends and most websoftware internal and for customers) i am pretty sure that there are really few people out there using the distribtuion in so many different setups, and even - not many are free to make each infrastructure decision involved too maybe this overall point of view of so many parts of a linux-system is the reason for my missing patience and sometimes not knowing how to explain someone who is only interested in a small specific part what i am saying because i can not explain over and over the full bandwith and where things act together AND do this in a foreign language sorry, but thats me signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [Help Wanted]Build error on aplus-fsf
Jochen Schmitt wrote: Hallo, I have some issues to build aplus-fsf via mock for the master branch. Because I don't have any idea to selve the existing issues, I have uploaded the build.log, the SPEC file and a patch to http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/aplus-fsf/ It will be nice, if anyone can get a look on it to give me a hint to solve the build errors. Best Regards: Jochen Schmitt I see one error: in the log: In file included from ../MSTypes/MSObjectTypeVector.H:96:0, from ../MSTypes/MSTypeVector.H:13, from ../MSTypes/MSBoolVector.H:13, from MSBoolVector.C:9: ../MSTypes/MSObjectTypeVectorInlines.C: In instantiation of 'MSObjectVectorType MSObjectVectorType::operator[](const MSBinaryVector) const [with Type = MSBool]': MSBoolVector.C:41:16: required from here ../MSTypes/MSObjectTypeVectorInlines.C:90:33: error: 'compress' was not declared in this scope, and no declarations were found by argument-dependent lookup at the point of instantiation [-fpermissive] ../MSTypes/MSObjectTypeVectorInlines.C:90:33: note: declarations in dependent base 'MSBaseVectorMSBool, MSVectorModelAllocatorMSBool ' are not found by unqualified lookup ../MSTypes/MSObjectTypeVectorInlines.C:90:33: note: use 'this-compress' instead Have you tried following its advice? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Booting Fedora from LVM with grub2
On Wed, 2012-03-28 at 22:16 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 28.03.2012 21:09, schrieb Jared K. Smith: On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: sorry but WHY do you strip the context of my message Because my reply wasn't about the content of your message. My reply was all about the *tone* of your email. there was simply NOTHING wrong in the tone of my mail because it is the same one i usually communicate with many people over more than 10 years about technical things and nobody has a problem exepct mailing lists I've heard at least a dozen people say they've gone to the trouble of explicitly killfiling your mails. That really isn't a sign that there's nothing wrong with your tone. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: RFC: Primary architecture promotion requirements
I'm planning on moving this to the Wiki (as a draft) at the end of the week, so if people have any further feedback please let me know. -- Matthew Garrett | mj...@srcf.ucam.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [Help Wanted]Build error on aplus-fsf
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Jim Meyering j...@meyering.net wrote: I see one error: in the log: In file included from ../MSTypes/MSObjectTypeVector.H:96:0, from ../MSTypes/MSTypeVector.H:13, from ../MSTypes/MSBoolVector.H:13, from MSBoolVector.C:9: ../MSTypes/MSObjectTypeVectorInlines.C: In instantiation of 'MSObjectVectorType MSObjectVectorType::operator[](const MSBinaryVector) const [with Type = MSBool]': MSBoolVector.C:41:16: required from here ../MSTypes/MSObjectTypeVectorInlines.C:90:33: error: 'compress' was not declared in this scope, and no declarations were found by argument-dependent lookup at the point of instantiation [-fpermissive] ../MSTypes/MSObjectTypeVectorInlines.C:90:33: note: declarations in dependent base 'MSBaseVectorMSBool, MSVectorModelAllocatorMSBool ' are not found by unqualified lookup ../MSTypes/MSObjectTypeVectorInlines.C:90:33: note: use 'this-compress' instead Have you tried following its advice? I had several packages break due to that change. For more information, see Name lookup changes on http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.7/porting_to.html. Jochen, while you're fixing this, could you also do something about https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523882 please? Thanks, -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Booting Fedora from LVM with grub2
On 03/28/2012 10:35 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: ah - i am not permitted to say my opinion of a very very bad idea before i become green light You are fighting a strawman and being repeatedly obnoxious about it. If you can't change how you voice your opinions, be silent. Rahul -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Booting Fedora from LVM with grub2
On 03/29/2012 04:39 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: Jared K. Smith wrote: Because my reply wasn't about the content of your message. My reply was all about the *tone* of your email. I know that language barrier is part of the problem here, but the tone of your email messages often comes across as demanding and condescending. Harald is simply frustrated by Fedora changes which in his view are clearly not for the better, and I can fully understand that, given that I find myself agreeing with him every so often. Something that looks like an improvement to a developer might actually be a regression in users' view. The tone of his messages is purely and simply a result of the frustration. I am not surprised by your excuse but I don't buy that at all. He comes off as rude in other mailing lists as well including the users list where he talks down on anyone who does things in a different way. If someone is so frustrated by Fedora that they feel compelled to behave this way, then they should pick something more suitable for them. Rahul -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: httpd 2.4 is coming, RFC on module packaging draft
Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: On 03/27/2012 05:15 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: I think removing the legacy cruft just for the goal of removing it is not helpful at all and is actually the main cause of half baked, half removed stuff in Fedora. Interesting how did you come to that conclusion? See e.g. how removing ConsoleKit just for the sake of removing it (when it had been coexisting with systemd just fine in F16) caused several issues, the worst being: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=794690 which has now been worked around by disabling the relevant PulseAudio functionality. (Not even the systemd author has managed to port his own daemon to the systemd API everyone is expected to use now!) This is not the first time that functionality regressed due to an incompatible change which could have been avoided. Kevin Kofler -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: ARM as a primary architecture
On 03/26/2012 08:00 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: Which leads me to a rant about ARM. G RANT!! I didn't think I'd ever love the BIOS, but compared to the alternatives (UEFI and a million different ARM bootloaders) it's simple and effective. There is some truth to that. Nobody is going to stand up and say that the 32-bit ARM zoo (as I have called it on a number of occasions) is a situation today. This is a case where strong leadership and aggressive standardization is required in order to have *one* platform. That work is ongoing at the moment, and in the interim, we live with slightly more pain than would be ideal. But therein lies the fun ;) In the future, ARM systems will transition increasingly to UEFI. Many ARM server systems will likely eventually boot with ACPI as well. They will smell like low-energy alternatives to PC servers over time, and in another decade or two something more exciting than UEFI will replace UEFI and folks will mail about how things were better with UEFI! Jon. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Dependencies on Bodhi Updates
Adam Williamson wrote: I think we'd need to make the second more optional than you suggest, though. For instance, when the desktop team pushes a 'GNOME 3.4' update with 30 packages in it, they really want that update to be tested as a whole - broadly they just want people to install all the updates, boot into GNOME, and make sure stuff mostly works. They probably don't want the entire update blocked if there's a typo in the Help file for one of the games, or something. Indeed. If I can't push my KDE SC update group because kfloppy doesn't have karma, I'm going to yell so loud that you'll be able to hear it even in America or Australia (*)! ;-) Kevin Kofler (*) which is NOT anywhere near Austria (where I live), for the geography- challenged among the readers of the mailing list ;-) -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: ARM as a primary architecture
On Wed, 2012-03-28 at 18:28 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: On Mar 28, 2012, at 5:23 PM, Jon Masters wrote: They will smell like low-energy alternatives to PC servers over time, and in another decade or two something more exciting than UEFI will replace UEFI and folks will mail about how things were better with UEFI! Well, it's not often I momentarily consider blowing my brains out. That did it though. The Fedora QA and anaconda teams are deeply familiar with such feelings, and prescribe gin. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
F16: compile shotwell 0.12
Shotwell 0.10 has a nasty event name corruption bug so I thought I would try to compile 0.12 from source. I installed the dependencies: # yum install vala GConf2-devel libgee-devel libgexiv2-devel glib2-devel gstreamer-devel gstreamer-plugins-base-devel gtk3-devel libgudev1-devel libexif-devel libgphoto2-devel LibRaw-devel libsoup-devel libstdc++-devel libxml2-devel rest-devel sqlite-devel m4 unique3-devel webkitgtk3-devel ... Complete! # Then installed the source and tried to build: $ git clone git://yorba.org/shotwell Cloning into 'shotwell'... remote: Counting objects: 19253, done. remote: Compressing objects: 100% (6565/6565), done. remote: Total 19253 (delta 15637), reused 15439 (delta 12585) Receiving objects: 100% (19253/19253), 9.95 MiB | 1.84 MiB/s, done. Resolving deltas: 100% (15637/15637), done. $ cd shotwell $ ./configure Configured. Type 'make' to build, 'make install' to install. $ make Requested 'gexiv2 = 0.3.92' but version of GExiv2 is 0.2.2 make: *** [pkgcheck] Error 1 I thought I saw 0.3.91 available in F17 but that would fail as well. Has anybody managed to compile Shotwell 0.12 on F16 successfully? . -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: ImageMagick update coming to 6.7.6-5 (.so.5)
On Wed, 2012-03-28 at 20:32 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Wed, 2012-03-28 at 21:58 +0400, Pavel Alexeev wrote: No, I have been tried edit update which was deleted to gave way to update of Orion Poplawski - bodhi said I can't add it because I have not commit rights to that package. Please see before in quote. Ah :/ so I guess provenpackagers *can* add any package to an update they have commit rights to, but they can't edit other people's updates. Non-proven-packagers can only add packages they specifically have commit rights for, to their own updates. Thanks for the clarification. This is new to me as well. Is it intentional that non-provenpackager J is not allowed to add other people's builds (of packages J does not co-maintain) to his update? I suspect it probably is, but I just didn't know. It kind of makes sense. However, I'm pretty sure it's a bug that provenpackagers can't edit other people's updates. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: F16: compile shotwell 0.12
On Wed, 2012-03-28 at 21:06 -0400, Gerry Reno wrote: Shotwell 0.10 has a nasty event name corruption bug so I thought I would try to compile 0.12 from source. I installed the dependencies: # yum install vala GConf2-devel libgee-devel libgexiv2-devel glib2-devel gstreamer-devel gstreamer-plugins-base-devel gtk3-devel libgudev1-devel libexif-devel libgphoto2-devel LibRaw-devel libsoup-devel libstdc++-devel libxml2-devel rest-devel sqlite-devel m4 unique3-devel webkitgtk3-devel ... Complete! # Then installed the source and tried to build: $ git clone git://yorba.org/shotwell Cloning into 'shotwell'... remote: Counting objects: 19253, done. remote: Compressing objects: 100% (6565/6565), done. remote: Total 19253 (delta 15637), reused 15439 (delta 12585) Receiving objects: 100% (19253/19253), 9.95 MiB | 1.84 MiB/s, done. Resolving deltas: 100% (15637/15637), done. $ cd shotwell $ ./configure Configured. Type 'make' to build, 'make install' to install. $ make Requested 'gexiv2 = 0.3.92' but version of GExiv2 is 0.2.2 make: *** [pkgcheck] Error 1 I thought I saw 0.3.91 available in F17 but that would fail as well. Has anybody managed to compile Shotwell 0.12 on F16 successfully? I'm not entirely sure what you want. I mean, shotwell tells you the gexiv2 it needs. F16 clearly doesn't have that version. We're not likely to bump F16's gexiv2 just so you can build a new shotwell for yourself. Your options appear to be 'build gexiv2 yourself' or 'give up'. Life sucks, but hey, I'm not sure what else anyone can do. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: ARM as a primary architecture
On 03/28/2012 06:13 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote: On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 07:23:48PM -0400, Jon Masters wrote: In the future, ARM systems will transition increasingly to UEFI. Many ARM server systems will likely eventually boot with ACPI as well. They will smell like low-energy alternatives to PC servers over time, and in another decade or two something more exciting than UEFI will replace UEFI and folks will mail about how things were better with UEFI! Oh no. Nobody's seriously considering UEFI ARM platforms without ACPI, are they? Wait, I thought there was some kind of flattened device tree or something that the ARM folks thought would let them avoid ACPI. Did that not pan out? Maybe MS put the kibosh on it? -- Andy -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
File Mojolicious-2.69.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by yaneti
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Mojolicious: 3e005788428d1d7bf8d044c3e893cd17 Mojolicious-2.69.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Mojolicious] Update to 2.69
commit fa1571b45e3237966f759008d79c2f54668c0863
Author: Yanko Kaneti yan...@declera.com
Date: Wed Mar 28 10:18:18 2012 +0300
Update to 2.69
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Mojolicious.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index e9919ed..a78a137 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -38,3 +38,4 @@ Mojolicious-0.26.tar.gz
/Mojolicious-2.49.tar.gz
/Mojolicious-2.51.tar.gz
/Mojolicious-2.56.tar.gz
+/Mojolicious-2.69.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Mojolicious.spec b/perl-Mojolicious.spec
index 330bde4..d7dd38c 100644
--- a/perl-Mojolicious.spec
+++ b/perl-Mojolicious.spec
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
Name: perl-Mojolicious
-Version:2.56
+Version:2.69
Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:A next generation web framework for Perl
License:Artistic 2.0
@@ -52,6 +52,9 @@ make test
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Wed Mar 28 2012 Yanko Kaneti yan...@declera.com - 2.69-1
+- Update to 2.69
+
* Fri Mar 2 2012 Yanko Kaneti yan...@declera.com - 2.56-1
- Update to 2.56
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index de8cc74..7202ae3 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-1d7ec01301b336c0b27085bc82e4c72c Mojolicious-2.56.tar.gz
+3e005788428d1d7bf8d044c3e893cd17 Mojolicious-2.69.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-IO-Socket-SSL/f17] Update to 1.62
Summary of changes: 25ec101... Update to 1.62 (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-IO-Socket-SSL] Created tag perl-IO-Socket-SSL-1.62-1.fc17
The lightweight tag 'perl-IO-Socket-SSL-1.62-1.fc17' was created pointing to: 25ec101... Update to 1.62 -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-IO-Socket-SSL] Created tag perl-IO-Socket-SSL-1.62-1.fc18
The lightweight tag 'perl-IO-Socket-SSL-1.62-1.fc18' was created pointing to: 25ec101... Update to 1.62 -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 807614] New: perl-Wx-0.9906 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-Wx-0.9906 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807614 Summary: perl-Wx-0.9906 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: perl-Wx AssignedTo: tcall...@redhat.com ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: tcall...@redhat.com, fedora-perl-devel-l...@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Latest upstream release: 0.9906 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.9905 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Wx/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 807613] New: perl-Socket-2.001 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-Socket-2.001 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807613 Summary: perl-Socket-2.001 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: perl-Socket AssignedTo: ppi...@redhat.com ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-l...@redhat.com, mmasl...@redhat.com, ppi...@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Latest upstream release: 2.001 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 2.000 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Socket/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 807239] perl-Wx-Perl-ProcessStream-0.32 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807239 Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|perl-Wx-Perl-ProcessStream- |perl-Wx-Perl-ProcessStream- |0.31 is available |0.32 is available --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-28 06:44:41 EDT --- Latest upstream release: 0.32 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.30 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Wx-Perl-ProcessStream/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Language-Prolog-Yaswi
perl-Language-Prolog-Yaswi has broken dependencies in the F-17 tree: On x86_64: perl-Language-Prolog-Yaswi-0.19-1.fc17.x86_64 requires libswipl.so.5.10.5()(64bit) On i386: perl-Language-Prolog-Yaswi-0.19-1.fc17.i686 requires libswipl.so.5.10.5 Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File Socket-2.001.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by ppisar
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Socket: 6bd842241466568b0fcce0688ecff27c Socket-2.001.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Socket] 2.001 bump
commit 3296877a31cc0a256cd3374dc2f6f9883e1191b6
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Mar 28 13:42:49 2012 +0200
2.001 bump
.gitignore |1 +
...x-AF_UNIX-sockaddr-padding-initialization.patch | 26
perl-Socket.spec | 10
sources|2 +-
4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index a0573d3..149a03f 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -5,3 +5,4 @@
/Socket-1.98.tar.gz
/Socket-1.99.tar.gz
/Socket-2.000.tar.gz
+/Socket-2.001.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Socket.spec b/perl-Socket.spec
index d2b0956..1cea97b 100644
--- a/perl-Socket.spec
+++ b/perl-Socket.spec
@@ -1,14 +1,12 @@
-%global cpan_version 2.000
+%global cpan_version 2.001
Name: perl-Socket
Version:%(eval echo '%{cpan_version}' | tr '_' '.')
-Release:3%{?dist}
+Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:C socket.h defines and structure manipulators
License:GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/Socket/
Source0:
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/P/PE/PEVANS/Socket-%{cpan_version}.tar.gz
-# Bug #806543, CPAN RT#76067
-Patch0: Socket-2.000-Fix-AF_UNIX-sockaddr-padding-initialization.patch
BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::CBuilder)
BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::Constant) = 0.23
@@ -32,7 +30,6 @@ includes all of the commonly used pound-defines like AF_INET,
SOCK_STREAM, etc.
%prep
%setup -q -n Socket-%{cpan_version}
-%patch0 -p1
%build
%{__perl} Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor OPTIMIZE=$RPM_OPT_FLAGS
@@ -55,6 +52,9 @@ make test
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Wed Mar 28 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 2.001-1
+- 2.001 bump (bug-fixing release)
+
* Tue Mar 27 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 2.000-3
- Fix invalid write while unpacking AF_UNIX sockaddr (bug #806543)
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 96f3fc2..8adca73 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-b90932492a85571a8e88c102dbdf9266 Socket-2.000.tar.gz
+6bd842241466568b0fcce0688ecff27c Socket-2.001.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Socket/f17] 2.001 bump
commit dddca5aa7c2abd48af5d19814cf42c2b6e093b0e
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Mar 28 13:42:49 2012 +0200
2.001 bump
.gitignore |1 +
...x-AF_UNIX-sockaddr-padding-initialization.patch | 26
perl-Socket.spec | 10
sources|2 +-
4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index caaa840..d8db76a 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -3,3 +3,4 @@
/Socket-1.96.tar.gz
/Socket-1.97.tar.gz
/Socket-2.000.tar.gz
+/Socket-2.001.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Socket.spec b/perl-Socket.spec
index e0d3373..94d013a 100644
--- a/perl-Socket.spec
+++ b/perl-Socket.spec
@@ -1,14 +1,12 @@
-%global cpan_version 2.000
+%global cpan_version 2.001
Name: perl-Socket
Version:%(eval echo '%{cpan_version}' | tr '_' '.')
-Release:3%{?dist}
+Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:C socket.h defines and structure manipulators
License:GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/Socket/
Source0:
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/P/PE/PEVANS/Socket-%{cpan_version}.tar.gz
-# Bug #806543, CPAN RT#76067
-Patch0: Socket-2.000-Fix-AF_UNIX-sockaddr-padding-initialization.patch
BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::CBuilder)
BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::Constant) = 0.23
@@ -32,7 +30,6 @@ includes all of the commonly used pound-defines like AF_INET,
SOCK_STREAM, etc.
%prep
%setup -q -n Socket-%{cpan_version}
-%patch0 -p1
%build
%{__perl} Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor OPTIMIZE=$RPM_OPT_FLAGS
@@ -55,6 +52,9 @@ make test
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Wed Mar 28 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 2.001-1
+- 2.001 bump (bug-fixing release)
+
* Tue Mar 27 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 2.000-3
- Fix invalid write while unpacking AF_UNIX sockaddr (bug #806543)
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 96f3fc2..8adca73 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-b90932492a85571a8e88c102dbdf9266 Socket-2.000.tar.gz
+6bd842241466568b0fcce0688ecff27c Socket-2.001.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Socket/f16] 2.001 bump
commit 9c632e89431320ff1adb0e0342e3b399120f5cb3
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Mar 28 13:42:49 2012 +0200
2.001 bump
.gitignore |1 +
...x-AF_UNIX-sockaddr-padding-initialization.patch | 26
perl-Socket.spec | 10
sources|2 +-
4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index a0573d3..149a03f 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -5,3 +5,4 @@
/Socket-1.98.tar.gz
/Socket-1.99.tar.gz
/Socket-2.000.tar.gz
+/Socket-2.001.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Socket.spec b/perl-Socket.spec
index a855a12..40d5c1f 100644
--- a/perl-Socket.spec
+++ b/perl-Socket.spec
@@ -1,14 +1,12 @@
-%global cpan_version 2.000
+%global cpan_version 2.001
Name: perl-Socket
Version:%(eval echo '%{cpan_version}' | tr '_' '.')
-Release:2%{?dist}
+Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:C socket.h defines and structure manipulators
License:GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/Socket/
Source0:
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/P/PE/PEVANS/Socket-%{cpan_version}.tar.gz
-# Bug #806543, CPAN RT#76067
-Patch0: Socket-2.000-Fix-AF_UNIX-sockaddr-padding-initialization.patch
BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::CBuilder)
BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::Constant) = 0.23
@@ -32,7 +30,6 @@ includes all of the commonly used pound-defines like AF_INET,
SOCK_STREAM, etc.
%prep
%setup -q -n Socket-%{cpan_version}
-%patch0 -p1
%build
%{__perl} Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor OPTIMIZE=$RPM_OPT_FLAGS
@@ -55,6 +52,9 @@ make test
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Wed Mar 28 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 2.001-1
+- 2.001 bump (bug-fixing release)
+
* Tue Mar 27 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 2.000-2
- Fix invalid write while unpacking AF_UNIX sockaddr (bug #806543)
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 96f3fc2..8adca73 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-b90932492a85571a8e88c102dbdf9266 Socket-2.000.tar.gz
+6bd842241466568b0fcce0688ecff27c Socket-2.001.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 807613] perl-Socket-2.001 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807613 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version||perl-Socket-2.001-1.fc18 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 807613] perl-Socket-2.001 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807613 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-28 07:53:07 EDT --- perl-Socket-2.001-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-4760/perl-Socket-2.001-1.fc17 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 807613] perl-Socket-2.001 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807613 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-28 07:54:10 EDT --- perl-Socket-2.001-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Socket-2.001-1.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File POE-1.352.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by psabata
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-POE: ee708ae508316c0ead5621911cfbe9ae POE-1.352.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-POE] 1.352 bump
commit 787250351f93ef4b569afb21fbca0d6dbafbc313
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Mar 28 15:32:15 2012 +0200
1.352 bump
.gitignore|1 +
perl-POE.spec | 21 +++--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 497bd1f..03dd38e 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -2,3 +2,4 @@ POE-1.289.tar.gz
/POE-1.312.tar.gz
/POE-1.350.tar.gz
/POE-1.351.tar.gz
+/POE-1.352.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-POE.spec b/perl-POE.spec
index ea3f69c..ddeb980 100644
--- a/perl-POE.spec
+++ b/perl-POE.spec
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
Name: perl-POE
-Version: 1.351
+Version: 1.352
Release: 1%{?dist}
Summary: POE - portable multitasking and networking framework for Perl
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ BuildRequires: perl(HTTP::Date)
BuildRequires: perl(HTTP::Request)
BuildRequires: perl(HTTP::Response)
BuildRequires: perl(HTTP::Status)
-BuildRequires: perl(POE::Test::Loops) = 1.350
+BuildRequires: perl(POE::Test::Loops) = 1.351
BuildRequires: perl(Socket) = 1.7
BuildRequires: perl(Socket6) = 0.14
BuildRequires: perl(Storable) = 2.16
@@ -49,13 +49,26 @@ Requires: perl(File::Spec) = 0.87
Requires: perl(IO::Handle) = 1.27
Requires: perl(IO::Pty)
Requires: perl(IO::Tty) = 1.08
+Requires: perl(POE::Test::Loops) = 1.351
Requires: perl(POSIX) = 1.02
Requires: perl(Socket) = 1.7
Requires: perl(Socket6) = 0.14
Requires: perl(Storable) = 2.16
+Requires: perl(Time::HiRes) = 1.59
%{?perl_default_filter}
+%global __requires_exclude
%{?__requires_exclude:__requires_exclude|}perl\\(Errno\\)
+%global __requires_exclude %__requires_exclude|perl\\(File::Spec\\)
+%global __requires_exclude %__requires_exclude|perl\\(IO::Handle\\)
+%global __requires_exclude %__requires_exclude|perl\\(IO::Tty\\)
+%global __requires_exclude %__requires_exclude|perl\\(POE::Test::Loops\\)
+%global __requires_exclude %__requires_exclude|perl\\(POSIX\\)
+%global __requires_exclude %__requires_exclude|perl\\(Socket\\)
+%global __requires_exclude %__requires_exclude|perl\\(Socket6\\)
+%global __requires_exclude %__requires_exclude|perl\\(Storable\\)
+%global __requires_exclude %__requires_exclude|perl\\(Time::HiRes\\)
+
%description
POE is a framework for cooperative, event driven multitasking in Perl.
Other languages have similar frameworks. Python has Twisted. TCL has the
@@ -104,6 +117,10 @@ make test
%{_mandir}/man3/*.3*
%changelog
+* Wed Mar 28 2012 Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com - 1.352-1
+- 1.352 bump
+- Filter underspecified dependencies
+
* Wed Mar 14 2012 Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com - 1.351-1
- 1.351 bump
- Remove command macros
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 5602aa6..ea26982 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-f1b4eba1e8045ffedbb405f1edf99681 POE-1.351.tar.gz
+ee708ae508316c0ead5621911cfbe9ae POE-1.352.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 806296] perl-POE-1.352 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806296 Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-POE-1.352-1.fc18 Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2012-03-28 09:38:37 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 807880] New: Authen::Simple requires Class::Data::Inheritable but rpm does not have dependancy
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Authen::Simple requires Class::Data::Inheritable but rpm does not have dependancy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807880 Summary: Authen::Simple requires Class::Data::Inheritable but rpm does not have dependancy Product: Fedora Version: 16 Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: perl-Authen-Simple AssignedTo: emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr ReportedBy: shi...@aem.umn.edu QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr, fedora-perl-devel-l...@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Description of problem: Authen::Simple requires Class::Data::Inheritable, but rpm does not have a dependency on perl-Class-Data-Inheritable package. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): perl-Authen-Simple-0.4-6.fc16.noarch How reproducible: every time Steps to Reproduce: 1. yum install perl-Authen-Simple 2. perl -e use Authen::Simple::PAM 3. Actual results: Step 2 output: Base class package Class::Data::Inheritable is empty. (Perhaps you need to 'use' the module which defines that package first, or make that module available in @INC (@INC contains: /usr/local/lib/perl5 /usr/local/share/perl5 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/lib/perl5 /usr/share/perl5 .). at /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Authen/Simple/Adapter.pm line 5 BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Authen/Simple/Adapter.pm line 5. Compilation failed in require at (eval 2) line 2. ...propagated at /usr/share/perl5/base.pm line 94. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/local/share/perl5/Authen/Simple/PAM.pm line 5. Compilation failed in require at -e line 1. Expected results: (no output from step 2) Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
