Re: Orphaning packages (was LibreOffice packages)
On Jun 29, 2023, at 7:47 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote: > Here is a list of Fedora packages which I maintained or co-maintained which I > won't be able to contribute to anymore: > > sloccount I grabbed sloccount as I’ve found it useful over the years. It looks the right level of incredibly low maintenance to add to the pile. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: LXQt Spin: packages not updated since April 2022
Thanks for the quick reply ;) I was only testing it in a VM as potential solution for a temporary weak-hardware use case - and I tend to prefer Qt-based solutions over GTK. I have already the confined-user/SELinux issue and a project from Fedora Docs on my schedule, which are both waiting to start. I cannot put much more on my schedule at the moment ;) However, if the SIG and the related maintainers cannot handle the LXQt packages at the moment either, it might be worth to discuss removing it from the promoted Spins list for now, doesn't it? Finally, the issue here is not just some average application but the desktop environment. Maybe I am a little too conservative in this respect, but imho once we promote and provide it as a Spin, that goes along with some responsibility. Users may start to rely on it and use it for critical/private data and processes. On 7/1/23 16:01, Neal Gompa wrote: On Sat, Jul 1, 2023 at 8:38 AM Christopher Klooz via devel wrote: Hi, I was testing an instance of the LXQt Spin in a VM and saw that after updating all packages, the LXQt packages are still with version 1.1.0, which is from April 2022. Current is 1.3.0. I read the LXQt team does not maintain itself, and 1.2.0 and 1.3.0 seem to not contain critical security issues or so, but does someone keep checking if something urgent comes up that requires action? (security or compatibility issues, broken processes/automation at maintainers, ...) Help is always desired and wanted. :) Certainly if you're interested in LXQt and keeping it up to date, helping out on that front would be greatly appreciated. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 39 Python 3.12 rebuilds to start in a side tag this week
On 01-07-2023 22:05, Michael J Gruber wrote: I may have a patch for rst2pdf - how do I chain-scratch build against f39-python? I probably don't, so how do I mock build with f39-build chroot? fedpkg mock-config --target f39-python > ~/.config/mock/f39-python.cfg fedpkg srpm mock -r f39-python --rebuild $SRPM That's what I've been doing and what others recommended on IRC. -- Sandro ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Orphaning packages (was LibreOffice packages)
On 6/29/23 16:47, Bastien Nocera wrote: Hello, As part of the same process outlined in Matthias Clasen's "LibreOffice packages" email, my upstream and downstream work on desktop Bluetooth, multimedia applications (namely totem, rhythmbox and sound-juicer) and libfprint/fprintd is being stopped, and all the rest of my upstream and downstream work will be reassigned depending on Red Hat's own priorities, as I am transferred to another team. While it's possible that some of the maintenance will stay with me in the new team, I've not yet been told which team I would be joining. Here is a list of Fedora packages which I maintained or co-maintained which I won't be able to contribute to anymore: apfs-fuse bluez codespell eosrei-emojione-fonts geocode-glib gnome-bluetooth gnome-epub-thumbnailer gnome-kra-ora-thumbnailer gnome-user-share gom grilo grilo-plugins ifuse iio-sensor-proxy libfprint libglib-testing libimobiledevice libpeas libplist libportal libusbmuxd low-memory-monitor malcontent power-profiles-daemon sloccount switcheroo-control totem totem-pl-parser umockdev usbmuxd I went ahead and picked up some of the GNOME packages from the list: gnome-bluetooth gnome-user-share gom libglib-testing libpeas libportal totem totem-pl-parser Victor (CC'd), do you want to pick up grilo and grilo-plugins? -- Kalev ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Red Hat & Fedora -- largely stepping out of this ecosystem
On 7/1/23 12:33, Piotr Szubiakowski wrote: I think we all have a problem understanding what this announcement means. I do believe CentOS Stream is awesome software. It has to be since it's close to what RHEL is. My problem with CentOS Stream is that it's not a distribution of my choice, and I feel forced to use CentOS Stream. While at the same time, distributions of my choice Fedora, Scientific Linux, CentOS Linux, Rocky Linux, and AlmaLinux, are consequently taken down, to a moment that I'm not sure whenever RHEL is still an open-source software. It is still as opensource as it is Ubuntu and SUSE. There are no clones of Ubuntu LTS with 10 years lifecycle, nor of SUSE Enterprise with their 10+ lifecyle. Most likely, I'm too paranoid, but I'm afraid that if Red Hat successfully kills RHEL downstream projects, bad things will start to happen to CentOS Stream as well. I'm afraid that could be the case too. This move will cool down the EL community significantly. I'm concerned of the future of EPEL itself. I wish RedHat would reduce their prices significantly for wider adoption, or just give the first 5 years for free as Ubuntu does. Regards, Carlos. OpenPGP_0x47EBED05C3375B1F.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 39 Python 3.12 rebuilds to start in a side tag this week
Some packages may build with py 3.12 but not work with it if they don't have tests. For example, python-PyMuPDF fails when it tries to builds its documentation, but the error is in rst2pdf. If I disable doc creation then python-PyMuPDF builds against py 3.12 (and the tests succeed). I may have a patch for rst2pdf - how do I chain-scratch build against f39-python? I probably don't, so how do I mock build with f39-build chroot? python-PyMuPDF FTBFS because of rst2pdf: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2224200 python-PyMuPDF builds without doc: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=102814124 Possible rst2pdf upstream fix: https://github.com/rst2pdf/rst2pdf/pull/1171#pullrequestreview-1508457716 (rst2pdf package lags behind upstream releases; upstream patch applies to 0.99 but not 0.97 where configparser is spelled ConfigParser) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Red Hat & Fedora -- largely stepping out of this ecosystem
On Fri, 2023-06-30 at 15:05 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > First I think this a storm in a teacup . I tend to agree. In the worst-case scenario, people like me who try to use open-source solely and don't pay for open-source will find a distribution that fits them best. And from Red Hat's perspective, we don't bring much value anyway. > Second Centos Stream is the RHEL without branding, people in general > didn't like the idea of Centos be updated before RHEL , when Centos > was > updated after RHEL , but that was the main change. > After whats happened was that not all was updated first in Centos > Stream like kernel (we saw updates with ABI breakage first on RHEL > ... > ). This announce is mainly , as I read, saying that exceptions will > be > over and all will be first on Centos Stream and than in RHEL I think we all have a problem understanding what this announcement means. I do believe CentOS Stream is awesome software. It has to be since it's close to what RHEL is. My problem with CentOS Stream is that it's not a distribution of my choice, and I feel forced to use CentOS Stream. While at the same time, distributions of my choice Fedora, Scientific Linux, CentOS Linux, Rocky Linux, and AlmaLinux, are consequently taken down, to a moment that I'm not sure whenever RHEL is still an open-source software. Most likely, I'm too paranoid, but I'm afraid that if Red Hat successfully kills RHEL downstream projects, bad things will start to happen to CentOS Stream as well. Cheers, Piotr ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Fedora rawhide compose report: 20230701.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230630.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230701.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 4 Added packages: 5 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 69 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 3.27 MiB Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded packages: 2.53 GiB Size of downgraded packages: 0 B Size change of upgraded packages: 36.33 MiB Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B = ADDED IMAGES = Image: LXQt live x86_64 Path: Spins/x86_64/iso/Fedora-LXQt-Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20230701.n.0.iso Image: LXQt raw-xz aarch64 Path: Spins/aarch64/images/Fedora-LXQt-Rawhide-20230701.n.0.aarch64.raw.xz = DROPPED IMAGES = Image: Kinoite dvd-ostree x86_64 Path: Kinoite/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Kinoite-ostree-x86_64-Rawhide-20230630.n.0.iso Image: Sway live x86_64 Path: Spins/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Sway-Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20230630.n.0.iso Image: Cinnamon live x86_64 Path: Spins/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Cinnamon-Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20230630.n.0.iso Image: Sericea dvd-ostree x86_64 Path: Sericea/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Sericea-ostree-x86_64-Rawhide-20230630.n.0.iso = ADDED PACKAGES = Package: golang-aead-minisign-0.2.0-1.fc39 Summary: A dead simple tool to sign files and verify digital signatures RPMs:golang-aead-minisign golang-aead-minisign-devel Size:2.70 MiB Package: golang-github-bmkessler-fastdiv-0-0.1.20230620git41d5178.fc39 Summary: Fast division, modulus and divisibility checks in Go RPMs:golang-github-bmkessler-fastdiv-devel Size:16.12 KiB Package: golang-github-jtolio-eventkit-0-0.1.20230620gita7bf797.fc39 Summary: A go library for reporting multidimensional events over UDP RPMs:golang-github-jtolio-eventkit-devel Size:20.20 KiB Package: golang-github-maxatome-testdeep-1.13.0-2.fc39 Summary: Tests HTTP APIs and provides tests suite RPMs:golang-github-maxatome-testdeep-devel Size:300.10 KiB Package: python-pdf2image-1.16.3-1.fc39 Summary: Convert PDF to PIL Image object RPMs:python-pdf2image-doc python3-pdf2image Size:247.36 KiB = DROPPED PACKAGES = = UPGRADED PACKAGES = Package: aardvark-dns-1.7.0-1.fc39 Old package: aardvark-dns-1.6.0-1.fc39 Summary: Authoritative DNS server for A/ container records RPMs: aardvark-dns Size: 3.78 MiB Size change: -3.95 KiB Changelog: * Thu Jun 29 2023 Packit - 1.7.0-1 - [packit] 1.7.0 upstream release Package: abrt-2.17.1-1.fc39 Old package: abrt-2.17.0-1.fc39 Summary: Automatic bug detection and reporting tool RPMs: abrt abrt-addon-ccpp abrt-addon-kerneloops abrt-addon-pstoreoops abrt-addon-upload-watch abrt-addon-vmcore abrt-addon-xorg abrt-atomic abrt-cli abrt-console-notification abrt-dbus abrt-desktop abrt-devel abrt-gui abrt-gui-devel abrt-gui-libs abrt-libs abrt-plugin-bodhi abrt-plugin-machine-id abrt-tui python3-abrt python3-abrt-addon python3-abrt-container-addon python3-abrt-doc Size: 4.99 MiB Size change: -20.81 KiB Changelog: * Wed Jun 28 2023 Python Maint - 2.17.0-2 - Rebuilt for Python 3.12 * Fri Jun 30 2023 Michal Srb - 2.17.1-1 - Update to upstream release 2.17.1 Package: annobin-12.17-1.fc39 Old package: annobin-12.12-1.fc39 Summary: Annotate and examine compiled binary files RPMs: annobin-annocheck annobin-docs annobin-libannocheck annobin-plugin-clang annobin-plugin-gcc annobin-plugin-llvm Size: 5.03 MiB Size change: 4.58 KiB Changelog: * Tue Jun 20 2023 Nick Clifton - 12.13-1 - Annocheck: Ignore /dev/null filename in string notes. - Annocheck: More tweaks to glibc detection heuristics. (#2215968) * Thu Jun 22 2023 Nick Clifton - 12.14-1 - Annocheck: Do not ignore separate debuginfo files that do not contain any DWARF. (#2144553) * Mon Jun 26 2023 Nick Clifton - 12.15-1 - Annocheck: Add --suppress-version-warnings option. * Tue Jun 27 2023 Nick Clifton - 12.16-1 - Annocheck: Ignore weak/undef function symbols when checking to see if a binary contains code. (#2217840) * Thu Jun 29 2023 Nick Clifton - 12.17-1 - Annocheck: Add detection of known parts of libstdc++-nonshared.a that contain gaps. (#2217864) Package: aspell-fi-0.7-21.fc39 Old package: aspell-fi-0.7-20.fc38 Summary: Finnish dictionaries for Aspell RPMs: aspell-fi Size: 2.58 MiB Size change: -534 B Changelog: * Fri Jun 30 2023 Johan Swensson - 0.7-21 - Deprecate package BZ#2218548 Package: aspell-la-20020503-20.fc39 Old package: aspell-la-20020503-19.fc38 Summary: Latin dictionaries for Aspell RPMs: aspell-la Size: 593.51 KiB Size change: -825 B Changelog: * Fri Jun 30 2023 Johan Swensson - 20020503-20 - Deprecate package BZ#2218561 Package: aspell-ml-0.03-27.fc39 Old package: aspell-ml-0.03-27.fc38 Summary: GNU Aspell Malayalam Dictionary Package RPMs: aspell-ml Size: 4.64 MiB Size change: -173 B Package
[Test-Announce] Fedora 39 Rawhide 20230701.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 39 Rawhide 20230701.n.0. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan Notable package version changes: python-blivet - 20230628.n.2: python-blivet-3.7.1-4.fc39.src, 20230701.n.0: python-blivet-3.8.0-1.fc39.src Test coverage information for the current release can be seen at: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/testcase_stats/39 You can see all results, find testing instructions and image download locations, and enter results on the Summary page: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_39_Rawhide_20230701.n.0_Summary The individual test result pages are: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_39_Rawhide_20230701.n.0_Installation https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_39_Rawhide_20230701.n.0_Base https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_39_Rawhide_20230701.n.0_Server https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_39_Rawhide_20230701.n.0_Cloud https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_39_Rawhide_20230701.n.0_Desktop https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_39_Rawhide_20230701.n.0_Security_Lab Thank you for testing! -- Mail generated by relvalconsumer: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/relvalconsumer ___ test-announce mailing list -- test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2219054] perltidy-20230701 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219054 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-ab380a326d has been submitted as an update to Fedora 39. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-ab380a326d -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219054 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202219054%23c3 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2219054] perltidy-20230701 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219054 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |ERRATA Fixed In Version||perltidy-20230701-1.fc39 Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Last Closed||2023-07-01 15:03:07 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-ab380a326d has been pushed to the Fedora 39 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219054 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202219054%23c4 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Orphaning packages (was LibreOffice packages)
Am 01.07.23 um 14:28 schrieb Peter Robinson: On Sat, Jul 1, 2023 at 12:50 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: On 01/07/2023 13:36, Chris Adams wrote: A lot of the corporate world has gone to the "cloud" don't have to worry about local backups of important documents and spreadsheets, they get sharing with minimal effort, they can access things from their mobile devices, etc. And voluntarily hand over all the corporate secrets to Google and Microsoft. Brilliant idea. This sort of comment is off topic, various companies are free to do with their data as they wish, just as you are free to do with it as you please. Frankly it's often more secure with cloud providers than on corporate networks. Either way that comment doesn't provide useful discourse in this discussion. No really, it defines requirements that a non-cloud solution addresses. Just to rephrase it; "it's often more secure (confidential) on corporate networks than with cloud providers". So a legitimately contribution to the discourse in having a functional desktop (office) environment. Whether its being flatpaked, rpmish, immutable packaged or what ever the future brings ... -- Leon ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2219054] perltidy-20230701 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219054 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Scratch build failed. Details below: BuilderException: Build failed: Command '['rpmbuild', '-D', '_sourcedir .', '-D', '_topdir .', '-bs', '/var/tmp/thn-29_w150n/perltidy.spec']' returned non-zero exit status 1. StdOut: setting SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH=1688169600 error: Bad file: ./Perl-Tidy-20230701.tar.gz: No such file or directory RPM build errors: Bad file: ./Perl-Tidy-20230701.tar.gz: No such file or directory Traceback: File "/usr/local/lib/python3.11/site-packages/hotness/use_cases/package_scratch_build_use_case.py", line 56, in build result = self.builder.build(request.package, request.opts) ^ File "/usr/local/lib/python3.11/site-packages/hotness/builders/koji.py", line 229, in build raise BuilderException( If you think this issue is caused by some bug in the-new-hotness, please report it on the-new-hotness issue tracker: https://github.com/fedora-infra/the-new-hotness/issues -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219054 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202219054%23c1 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2219054] perltidy-20230701 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219054 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1973610 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1973610=edit Update to 20230701 (#2219054) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219054 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202219054%23c2 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2219054] New: perltidy-20230701 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219054 Bug ID: 2219054 Summary: perltidy-20230701 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perltidy Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: p...@city-fan.org Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: lxt...@gmail.com, p...@city-fan.org, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Releases retrieved: 20230701 Upstream release that is considered latest: 20230701 Current version/release in rawhide: 20230309-1.fc39 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Perl-Tidy/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_Monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/3553/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perltidy -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219054 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202219054%23c0 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: LXQt Spin: packages not updated since April 2022
On Sat, Jul 1, 2023 at 8:38 AM Christopher Klooz via devel wrote: > > Hi, > > I was testing an instance of the LXQt Spin in a VM and saw that after > updating all packages, the LXQt packages are still with version 1.1.0, > which is from April 2022. Current is 1.3.0. > > I read the LXQt team does not maintain itself, and 1.2.0 and 1.3.0 seem > to not contain critical security issues or so, but does someone keep > checking if something urgent comes up that requires action? (security or > compatibility issues, broken processes/automation at maintainers, ...) > Help is always desired and wanted. :) Certainly if you're interested in LXQt and keeping it up to date, helping out on that front would be greatly appreciated. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
LXQt Spin: packages not updated since April 2022
Hi, I was testing an instance of the LXQt Spin in a VM and saw that after updating all packages, the LXQt packages are still with version 1.1.0, which is from April 2022. Current is 1.3.0. I read the LXQt team does not maintain itself, and 1.2.0 and 1.3.0 seem to not contain critical security issues or so, but does someone keep checking if something urgent comes up that requires action? (security or compatibility issues, broken processes/automation at maintainers, ...) Regards, Chris ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Orphaning packages (was LibreOffice packages)
On Sat, Jul 1, 2023 at 12:50 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > On 01/07/2023 13:36, Chris Adams wrote: > > A lot of the corporate world has gone to the "cloud" > > > don't have to worry about local backups of important documents and > > spreadsheets, they get sharing with minimal effort, they can access > > things from their mobile devices, etc. > > And voluntarily hand over all the corporate secrets to Google and > Microsoft. Brilliant idea. This sort of comment is off topic, various companies are free to do with their data as they wish, just as you are free to do with it as you please. Frankly it's often more secure with cloud providers than on corporate networks. Either way that comment doesn't provide useful discourse in this discussion. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Orphaning packages (was LibreOffice packages)
On 01/07/2023 13:36, Chris Adams wrote: A lot of the corporate world has gone to the "cloud" don't have to worry about local backups of important documents and spreadsheets, they get sharing with minimal effort, they can access things from their mobile devices, etc. And voluntarily hand over all the corporate secrets to Google and Microsoft. Brilliant idea. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 39 Python 3.12 rebuilds to start in a side tag this week
On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 8:44 PM Tomáš Hrnčiar wrote: > python-redis cicku kevin maxamillion > I've filled https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-redis/pull-request/13 , that should get python-redis going and unstuck a bunch of packages depending on it. Just a note, the failure wasn't caused by Python 3.12, but redis 7.2 rebase in rawhide. -- Best regards / S pozdravem, František Zatloukal Senior Quality Engineer Red Hat ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Orphaning packages (was LibreOffice packages)
Once upon a time, Kevin Kofler said: > Peter Robinson wrote: > > I would hardly say Libreoffice, bluetooth on the desktop and certain > > iDevice pieces is "killing all work on the desktop" it's more focusing > > on things that are important to their customers in those contexts. > > What corporate desktop customers do not use LibreOffice? If RH considers > LibreOffice unimportant to their customers, it is obvious that they only > care about server customers. A lot of the corporate world has gone to the "cloud" (Google Docs or O365) for their office needs, enough that even where Windows is the predominant desktop OS, they don't get MS Office licenses either. They don't have to worry about local backups of important documents and spreadsheets, they get sharing with minimal effort, they can access things from their mobile devices, etc. -- Chris Adams ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Orphaning packages (was LibreOffice packages)
On Sat, Jul 1, 2023 at 12:30 PM Peter Robinson wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 1, 2023 at 12:00 AM Kevin Kofler via devel > wrote: > > > > Peter Robinson wrote: > > > I would hardly say Libreoffice, bluetooth on the desktop and certain > > > iDevice pieces is "killing all work on the desktop" it's more focusing > > > on things that are important to their customers in those contexts. > > > > What corporate desktop customers do not use LibreOffice? If RH considers > > LibreOffice unimportant to their customers, it is obvious that they only > > care about server customers. > > Well if the customer gets it via Flatpak they still have it, it also > means it doesn't need to be upgraded in lockstep with the OS so they > can go to newer versions while keeping the same rev of the desktop or > vica versa. > > But then there's also "desktop usecases like retail point of sale and > a whole lot of other single use UX graphical like display boards, > ticket machines, places where they're technical workstations and the > user has a separate windows device for email/office etc. There's a > vast array. Also a lot use online docs like Office365 or Google docs. I personally used to use Libreoffice a lot but now I mostly use gDocs. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Orphaning packages (was LibreOffice packages)
On Sat, Jul 1, 2023 at 12:00 AM Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > > Peter Robinson wrote: > > I would hardly say Libreoffice, bluetooth on the desktop and certain > > iDevice pieces is "killing all work on the desktop" it's more focusing > > on things that are important to their customers in those contexts. > > What corporate desktop customers do not use LibreOffice? If RH considers > LibreOffice unimportant to their customers, it is obvious that they only > care about server customers. Well if the customer gets it via Flatpak they still have it, it also means it doesn't need to be upgraded in lockstep with the OS so they can go to newer versions while keeping the same rev of the desktop or vica versa. But then there's also "desktop usecases like retail point of sale and a whole lot of other single use UX graphical like display boards, ticket machines, places where they're technical workstations and the user has a separate windows device for email/office etc. There's a vast array. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: more distinct default bash prompt?
Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote:
> it now defaults to normal green and adds the
> red error code from Stephan (maybe this part could still be improved?)
I like the red error code enough that I'm trying it out on my own
workstation. Yet I doubt it's suitable for the default prompt. I'll
remember what it means because I've configured it myself. To a beginner
who hasn't configured their prompt, the intermittent appearance of a
red number will be very cryptic.
If the error code is included, then appending it to the working
directory isn't the best choice. It looks like a part of the directory
name, especially to red/green blind users I expect. There should be a
space or other separator, but even then it could be ambiguous as
filenames can contain almost any characters. Writing the error code
before the username is less confusing. Users are unlikely to think that
the digits are part of their username.
This code expands to nothing if the exit code is zero, and to the exit
code followed by a space otherwise:
prompt_result_separator=' '
PS1='\[\e[0;31m\]${?#0}\[\e[0m\]${prompt_result_separator[!$?]}...'
Note also the "0;" in the beginning. I think all prompts should begin
with that to clear any attributes that may have been left behind by a
broken program. (Try "echo -e '\e[8m'" and see if it hides your prompt.)
Björn Persson
pgp_JLupc3tON.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signatur
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2219043] New: perl-Term-ReadLine-Gnu-1.46 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219043 Bug ID: 2219043 Summary: perl-Term-ReadLine-Gnu-1.46 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Term-ReadLine-Gnu Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: emman...@seyman.fr Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: c...@fea.st, emman...@seyman.fr, lkund...@v3.sk, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Releases retrieved: 1.46 Upstream release that is considered latest: 1.46 Current version/release in rawhide: 1.45-2.fc38 URL: https://metacpan.org/dist/Term-ReadLine-Gnu/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_Monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/7548/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Term-ReadLine-Gnu -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219043 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202219043%23c0 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
