[rpms/perl-inc-latest] PR #1: Package tests; Modernize spec

[Jitka Plesnikova]

jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-inc-latest` that 
you are following:
``
Package tests; Modernize spec
``

To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-inc-latest/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: An update on RHEL moving to issues.redhat.com

[Clement Verna]

OOn Thu, 14 Sept 2023, 18:01 Adam Williamson, 
wrote:

> On Thu, 2023-09-14 at 14:50 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 2:42 PM Colin Walters 
> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Sep 13, 2023, at 1:44 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 09:20:09AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > > > IIRC it was a condition of that proposal that we wind up on a
> hosted
> > > > > version of the *open source* release of gitlab, which is something
> we
> > > > > managed to talk gitlab into doing for us. IMBW, though, it was a
> while
> > > > > ago.
> > > >
> > > > Short version is: yes, we did talk them into that with an informal
> plan, and
> > > > then someone higher up at gitlab pulled the plug on the idea.
> > >
> > > FWIW I interact with pagure rarely enough that it is somewhat painful
> to context switch each time.  I accept having to deal with both github and
> gitlab, but going from 2 to 3 has a real cost, particularly around things
> like CI systems.
> >
> > Switch GitLab and Pagure in that statement and I could say the exact
> same thing.
> >
> > Personally, I find the Pagure UI (and GitHub) to be much cleaner and
> > easier to navigate than the UX mess that is GitLab ...
> > I even find fully FOSS alternatives like Forgejo (Codeberg) *much*
> > easier to use than GitLab.
>
> UI is one thing, but Colin's not wrong about CI.
>
> Love Github or hate it, Github Actions is a pretty strong CI
> implementation that is very easy to set up. I haven't personally set up
> CI for a Gitlab repo yet, but I believe it's also relatively simple
> there.
>

At the risk of being controversial and a voice of the minority, I think
using GitHub would be beneficial for the Fedora project. In practice
already most of packagers have to use GitHub to collaborate with upstream
so it wouldn't  be a tool to learn. But where, GitHub would be really
beneficial IMO is for making our work more visible and reachable to attract
new contributors. It is also worth to mention that other distros close to
Fedora like Alma Linux or Rocky Linux are using GitHub for their
development and it doesn't seems to be a problem.


> Doing it for a non-dist-git Pagure project is not *terrible*, but it
> involves a lot more finicky steps than doing it on Github, including
> waiting for someone to merge a pull request you have to file halfway
> through:
>
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Zuul-based-ci#How_to_attach_a_Pagure_repository_on_Zuul
>
> and you don't have access to something like the Github Actions library
> of setup steps to configure your environment. It would be a significant
> enhancement to Pagure if this experience could be made smoother for
> non-dist-git projects.
>
> On the whole, I do mostly like Pagure's UI too, but it is missing some
> capabilities compared to much more deeply-funded projects (not a
> surprise).
> --
> Adam Williamson (he/him/his)
> Fedora QA
> Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @ad...@fosstodon.org
> https://www.happyassassin.net
>
>
>
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

SPDX Statistics - Marco Polo edition

[Miroslav Suchý]

Two weeks ago we had:


* 23128 spec files in Fedora

* 29572license tags in all spec files

* 16519 tags have not been converted to SPDX yet

* 6059tags can be trivially converted using `license-fedora2spdx`

* Progress: 44.14% ██ 100%

ELN subset:

825 out of 2479 packages are not converted yet



Today we have:

* 23143 spec files in Fedora

* 29600license tags in all spec files

* 16169 tags have not been converted to SPDX yet

* 5903tags can be trivially converted using `license-fedora2spdx`

* Progress: 45.35% ██ 100%

ELN subset:

603 out of 2986 packages are not converted yet

Graph with the burndown chart:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1QVMEzXWML-6_Mrlln02axFAaRKCQ8zE807rpCjus-8s/edit?usp=sharing

The list of packages needed to be converted is here:

https://pagure.io/copr/license-validate/blob/main/f/packages-without-spdx-final.txt

List by package maintainers is here

https://pagure.io/copr/license-validate/blob/main/f/packages-without-spdx-final-maintainers.txt

List of packages from ELN subset that needs to be converted:

https://pagure.io/copr/license-validate/blob/main/f/eln-not-migrated.txt

New version of fedora-license-data has been released. With 17 new licenses (plus bunch of public domain declarations). 
31 licenses are waiting to be review by SPDX.org (and then to be added to fedora-license-data).


Legal docs and especially

https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/allowed-licenses/

was updated too.


New projection when we will be finished is 2025-01-30 (we are slowing down. 
Again. :( ). Pure linear approximation.

If your package does not have neither git-log entry nor spec-changelog entry mentioning SPDX and you know your license 
tag matches SPDX formula, you can put your package on ignore list


https://pagure.io/copr/license-validate/blob/main/f/ignore-packages.txt

Either pull-request or direct email to me is fine.


Why Marco Polo edition? On today's date at 1254, an Italian merchant Marco Polo was born. He traveled to Asia (today's 
China). It took him 4 years to get there, 3 years to get back. And he stayed 17 years there. He wrote a book Millione 
about this travel. That made him famous and even nowadays is great insight about Asia of that time.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marco_Polo
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Travels_of_Marco_Polo

Do you hesitate how to proceed with the migration? Please follow

https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/update-existing-packages/

Miroslav


___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Blender 3.6.2 failure to build

[Elliott Sales de Andrade]

Hi,

On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 11:12 PM Luya Tshimbalanga
 wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> Blender 3.6.2 [0] failed to build on both Rawhide and incoming Fedora 39 [1] 
> but succeeded on Fedora 38 and lower. It seems the issues related to python 
> 3.12 yet again despite the applied patches. Could some investigate please?
> Thanks.

I don't see any reference to Python 3.12 there. The error is:

In file included from /usr/include/epoxy/egl.h:46,
 from
/builddir/build/BUILD/blender-3.6.2/intern/ghost/intern/GHOST_ContextEGL.hh:13,
 from
/builddir/build/BUILD/blender-3.6.2/intern/ghost/intern/GHOST_XrGraphicsBinding.cc:12:
/builddir/build/BUILD/blender-3.6.2/intern/ghost/intern/GHOST_XrGraphicsBinding.cc:
In member function ‘virtual void
GHOST_XrGraphicsBindingOpenGL::initFromGhostContext(GHOST_Context&)’:
/builddir/build/BUILD/blender-3.6.2/intern/ghost/intern/GHOST_XrGraphicsBinding.cc:154:42:
error: invalid conversion from ‘void (* (*)(const char*))()’ to
‘PFN_xrEglGetProcAddressMNDX’ {aka ‘void* (*)(const char*)’}
[-fpermissive]
  154 | oxr_binding.egl.getProcAddress = eglGetProcAddress;
  |  ^
  |  |
  |  void (* (*)(const char*))()

which looks like
https://projects.blender.org/blender/blender/issues/111820 Try
applying the linked patch in
https://projects.blender.org/blender/blender/commit/8159bd90e527552ccfe27db5f2c5a91d64855e9e

> Reference
> -
> [0] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/blender
> [1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=106208127

-- 
Elliott
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Blender 3.6.2 failure to build

[Luya Tshimbalanga]

Hello everyone,

Blender 3.6.2 [0] failed to build on both Rawhide and incoming Fedora 39 [1] 
but succeeded on Fedora 38 and lower. It seems the issues related to python 
3.12 yet again despite the applied patches. Could some investigate please?
Thanks. 

Reference
-
[0] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/blender
[1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=106208127
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2238733] perl-HTML-Template-Expr for EL8 and EL9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2238733



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-bcde48fe02 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-bcde48fe02

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2238733

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202238733%23c3
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 1860591] perl-mime-construct missing in EPEL 8

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860591



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-6c8fb57c62 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-6c8fb57c62

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860591

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%201860591%23c6
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2238817] perl-Data-Visitor for EL9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2238817



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-d8b4edb69c has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-d8b4edb69c

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2238817

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202238817%23c7
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2238733] perl-HTML-Template-Expr for EL8 and EL9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2238733

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-0df85b0c76 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-0df85b0c76

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2238733

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202238733%23c2
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2238817] perl-Data-Visitor for EL9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2238817

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-bc14431fd8 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-bc14431fd8

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2238817

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202238817%23c6
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 1860591] perl-mime-construct missing in EPEL 8

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860591

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-198b935d8e has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-198b935d8e

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860591

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%201860591%23c5
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2238875] perl-MCE-1.889 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2238875



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-e303f44cf5 has been pushed to the Fedora 39 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh
--advisory=FEDORA-2023-e303f44cf5`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-e303f44cf5

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2238875

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202238875%23c4
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2239043] perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES-0.07 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2239043



--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
Created attachment 1988897
  --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1988897=edit
Update to 0.07 (#2239043)


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2239043

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202239043%23c2
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2239043] New: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES-0.07 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2239043

Bug ID: 2239043
   Summary: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES-0.07 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: wjhns...@hardakers.net
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org,
wjhns...@hardakers.net
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Releases retrieved: 0.07
Upstream release that is considered latest: 0.07
Current version/release in rawhide: 0.02-51.fc39
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Crypt-OpenSSL-AES/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_Monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.


Based on the information from Anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/2743/


To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2239043

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202239043%23c0
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2239043] perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES-0.07 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2239043



--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
Scratch build failed. Details below:

BuilderException: Build failed:
Command '['rpmbuild', '-D', '_sourcedir .', '-D', '_topdir .', '-bs',
'/var/tmp/thn-yw8_8zso/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES.spec']' returned non-zero exit
status 1.

StdOut:
setting SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH=1694649600
error: Bad file: ./Crypt-OpenSSL-AES-0.07.tar.gz: No such file or directory

RPM build errors:
Bad file: ./Crypt-OpenSSL-AES-0.07.tar.gz: No such file or directory


Traceback:
  File
"/usr/local/lib/python3.11/site-packages/hotness/use_cases/package_scratch_build_use_case.py",
line 56, in build
result = self.builder.build(request.package, request.opts)
 ^
  File "/usr/local/lib/python3.11/site-packages/hotness/builders/koji.py", line
229, in build
raise BuilderException(

If you think this issue is caused by some bug in the-new-hotness, please report
it on the-new-hotness issue tracker:
https://github.com/fedora-infra/the-new-hotness/issues


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2239043

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202239043%23c1
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2238870] perl-Test2-Suite-0.000156 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2238870

Michal Josef Spacek  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version||perl-Test2-Suite-0.000156-1
   ||.fc40
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Last Closed||2023-09-14 21:09:44




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2238870
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2238733] perl-HTML-Template-Expr for EL8 and EL9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2238733

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |MODIFIED



--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-bcde48fe02 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-bcde48fe02


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2238733

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202238733%23c1
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: F40 Change Proposal: KDE Plasma 6 (System Wide)

[Steven A. Falco]

On 9/14/23 04:20 PM, Steven A. Falco wrote:

I've written a bug [1] stating that window placement appears to be ignored.  
Specifically the following command ignores the requested placement under 
Plasma(Wayland) but the placement is honored under Plasma(X11).  That is a big 
problem in a multi-screen environment:

/usr/bin/konsole --qwindowgeometry 675x678+3754+870 &

 Steve

[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2239016


One more for now, but then I have to go back to X11.  For some reason, some 
windows are not remembered between sessions [1].

[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2239029

Steve

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: The new Change discussion process is painful

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 10:44:22AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> If I was subscribed to some categories without doing anything, e.g. "Package
> Reviews Swaps" (why I cannot copy the string from UI , this is precisely
> the annoyance with web applications), why I have not been subscribed to
> "Change proposals"?

The 'package review swaps' thing was a mistake/hasty setup by mattdm. :)

Basically the category was setup and the thought was "hey, all people in
the packager group would be interested in this, right?" and so everyone
in the packager group (that had logged into discourse) was added to it.

This should have been reverted not long after... 

There's no single group that would make sense to just auto subscribe to
change proposals. Anyone could be interested in it, or not. 

kevin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[rpms/perl-Test2-Suite] PR #40: 0.000156 bump

[Michal Josef Špaček]

mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Test2-Suite` that you 
are following.

Merged pull-request:

``
0.000156 bump
``

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Test2-Suite/pull-request/40
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[rpms/perl-Test2-Suite] PR #40: 0.000156 bump

[Michal Josef Špaček]

mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Test2-Suite` that 
you are following:
``
0.000156 bump
``

To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Test2-Suite/pull-request/40
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: F40 Change Proposal: KDE Plasma 6 (System Wide)

[Steven A. Falco]

On 9/14/23 06:36 AM, Ian McInerney wrote:



On Thu, 14 Sep 2023, 00:17 Neal Gompa, mailto:ngomp...@gmail.com>> wrote:

On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 7:02 PM Steven A. Falco mailto:stevenfa...@gmail.com>> wrote:
 >
 > On 9/13/23 05:23 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
 > > Right. And I want to stress we are not dropping support for X11
 > > applications. Anything running as an X client in a desktop should work
 > > as it has before.
 >
 > I'm not convinced KiCad will work in that scenario, so please let me 
summarize what I've read here, and please correct me if I have any of this wrong.
 >
 > The thing being removed is "Plasma(X11)", which is a native X11 stack; 
i.e. no Wayland or Xwayland is involved when using Plasma(X11).  This mode is well supported 
by KiCad, and additionally it works well with my multi-monitor setup.
 >
 > Should the change proposal be accepted, "Plasma(X11)" will be removed, leaving 
"Plasma(Wayland)" as the only available KDE mode.  Also, all X11 applications will then be 
forced to use XWayland rather than X11, at least under KDE.
 >
 > Assuming my summary is correct, here are my personal problems:
 >
 > Problem 1: The KiCad team says they don't support XWayland (nor do they 
support pure Wayland) because of bugs.
 >

 >From what I've read through the issues, the ultimate problem is in
GTK, not wxWidgets, as there is in fact a supported Wayland protocol
for mouse warping[1]. Does this issue exist when using wxQt instead of
wxGTK? Admittedly, I'm not sure of the state of things with wxWidgets
and the backends...

[1]: https://wayland.app/protocols/pointer-constraints-unstable-v1 



Speaking as a member of the KiCad core development team, I am not convinced that 
extension will be easy to use. When I looked at it a few weeks ago, it still seemed 
to have portability problems between compositors/WM implementations. (See here for my 
conclusion 
https://github.com/wxWidgets/wxWidgets/issues/23778#issuecomment-1680398578 
). 
As a project, we already have to deal with enough problems from supporting MSW, macOS 
and Linux that having to now workaround quirks in different graphics stacks is not 
something we have the time or developer effort to do. We would rather be actually 
creating the features all our users need for their work instead of having to fight 
with the graphics stacks all the time.

And aside from the mouse warping, we also want the ability to control where 
windows are placed on the screen. We are a multi-window application, and our 
users usually have a preferred setup for how the windows are arranged on their 
screen. Right now, we can save/restore that for them, but my understanding of 
the Wayland spec is that this is not allowed and so we are at the mercy of the 
desktop to put the windows where it wants.

-Ian


I've written a bug [1] stating that window placement appears to be ignored.  
Specifically the following command ignores the requested placement under 
Plasma(Wayland) but the placement is honored under Plasma(X11).  That is a big 
problem in a multi-screen environment:

/usr/bin/konsole --qwindowgeometry 675x678+3754+870 &

Steve

[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2239016
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[rpms/perl-Crypt-DES] PR #2: Update license field to new BSD-Systemics SPDX license i

[Paul Howarth]

pghmcfc merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Crypt-DES` that you 
are following.

Merged pull-request:

``
Update license field to new BSD-Systemics SPDX license i
``

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Crypt-DES/pull-request/2
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 1860591] perl-mime-construct missing in EPEL 8

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860591

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-198b935d8e has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-198b935d8e


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860591

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%201860591%23c3
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[rpms/perl-Crypt-IDEA] PR #1: Update license field to new BSD-Systemics SPDX license id

[Michal Josef Špaček]

mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Crypt-IDEA` that 
you are following:
``
Update license field to new BSD-Systemics SPDX license id
``

To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Crypt-IDEA/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[rpms/perl-Crypt-DES] PR #2: Update license field to new BSD-Systemics SPDX license i

[Michal Josef Špaček]

mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Crypt-DES` that 
you are following:
``
Update license field to new BSD-Systemics SPDX license i
``

To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Crypt-DES/pull-request/2
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: %prep leaving SPECPARTS directories lying around

[Jerry James]

On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 12:32 PM Adam Williamson
 wrote:
> It seems like, as of fairly recently, the %prep stage for any Fedora
> package build leaves an empty directory named the same as the package
> source directory with with -SPECPARTS appended lying around.
>
> Do we know why this is happening, and can it be stopped? It already
> caused problems for CI for a few packages, and it's just a bit messy...

I think it is related to the dynamic spec file feature.  See
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/discussions/2032.

Also see https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2532
for some other cases where SPECPARTS caused issues.
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2238870] perl-Test2-Suite-0.000156 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2238870

Michal Josef Spacek  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value



--- Comment #1 from Michal Josef Spacek  ---
Changes:

0.000156  2023-09-13 15:11:52-07:00 America/Los_Angeles

- Fix typo in POD for Test2::Util::Importer

There are other API changes not present in the Changelog.

Only for rawhide.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2238870

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202238870%23c1
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Fedora Linux 39 Beta is GO

[Adam Williamson]

The Fedora Linux 39 Beta-1.1 compose is GO and will be shipped live on
Tuesday, 19 September 2023.

For more information please check the Go/No-Go meeting minutes[1] or
log[2].

[1] 
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2023-09-14/f39-beta-go_no_go-meeting.2023-09-14-17.00.html
[2] 
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2023-09-14/f39-beta-go_no_go-meeting.2023-09-14-17.00.log.html
-- 
Adam Williamson (he/him/his)
Fedora QA
Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @ad...@fosstodon.org
https://www.happyassassin.net



___
devel-announce mailing list -- devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Fedora Linux 39 Beta is GO

[Adam Williamson]

The Fedora Linux 39 Beta-1.1 compose is GO and will be shipped live on
Tuesday, 19 September 2023.

For more information please check the Go/No-Go meeting minutes[1] or
log[2].

[1] 
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2023-09-14/f39-beta-go_no_go-meeting.2023-09-14-17.00.html
[2] 
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2023-09-14/f39-beta-go_no_go-meeting.2023-09-14-17.00.log.html
-- 
Adam Williamson (he/him/his)
Fedora QA
Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @ad...@fosstodon.org
https://www.happyassassin.net



___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Will noarch packages "inherit" ExcludeArch from another noarch package

[Lyes Saadi]

Oh, wow ! Thank you so much !

Didn't expect for it to be solved this quickly when giving up :P !

Le 13/09/2023 à 16:51, Jerry James a écrit :

On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 10:02 PM Jerry James  wrote:

I looked at blueprint-compiler tonight, and found 2 bugs with the
handling of bitfields.  Sadly, fixing those still doesn't make the
test suite pass, so there is at least one more bug lurking somewhere.
Still, I think the package is probably fixable.  If you can wait just
a little longer, I will try to find the next bug tomorrow.

Bug 3 was on the line right next to bug 2. :-)  I have opened
https://gitlab.gnome.org/jwestman/blueprint-compiler/-/merge_requests/143.
That patch does not apply cleanly to version 0.6.0, but the attached
version does.

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: F40 Change Proposal: KDE Plasma 6 (System Wide)

[Fabio Valentini]

On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 8:29 PM Ian Pilcher  wrote:
>
> On 9/14/23 11:15, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > I am interested in learning where you're seeing screen sharing issues
> > today. The main one people bring up with me is video conferencing
> > systems, and because of completely unrelated reasons, I've been on a
> > binge of using a variety of them.
>
> I thought that I had it working.  Then it failed with Google Meet and
> Firefox when I put a Google Slides presentation into full screen mode.
>
> I.e., it worked fine at first, but other people only saw a black screen
> when I put the presentation into full screen mode.
>
> Fortunately, this was an internal team call, but this sort of thing is
> a disaster in a customer-facing situation.  To not have the ability to
> switch back to X11 is (IMO) unacceptable.  (I certainly wouldn't be able
> to use Fedora/Plasma on my work laptop.)

Fedora 40 will be released ~7 months from now, so it's not like
there's still ample time to find, report, and fix bugs like this ...

, in case it wasn't obvious.

Fabio
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

%prep leaving SPECPARTS directories lying around

[Adam Williamson]

It seems like, as of fairly recently, the %prep stage for any Fedora
package build leaves an empty directory named the same as the package
source directory with with -SPECPARTS appended lying around.

Do we know why this is happening, and can it be stopped? It already
caused problems for CI for a few packages, and it's just a bit messy...
-- 
Adam Williamson (he/him/his)
Fedora QA
Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @ad...@fosstodon.org
https://www.happyassassin.net



___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: F40 Change Proposal: KDE Plasma 6 (System Wide)

[Ian Pilcher]

On 9/14/23 11:15, Neal Gompa wrote:

I am interested in learning where you're seeing screen sharing issues
today. The main one people bring up with me is video conferencing
systems, and because of completely unrelated reasons, I've been on a
binge of using a variety of them.


I thought that I had it working.  Then it failed with Google Meet and
Firefox when I put a Google Slides presentation into full screen mode.

I.e., it worked fine at first, but other people only saw a black screen
when I put the presentation into full screen mode.

Fortunately, this was an internal team call, but this sort of thing is
a disaster in a customer-facing situation.  To not have the ability to
switch back to X11 is (IMO) unacceptable.  (I certainly wouldn't be able
to use Fedora/Plasma on my work laptop.)

--

Google  Where SkyNet meets Idiocracy


___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: The new Change discussion process is painful

[Aoife Moloney]

On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 7:08 PM Kevin Kofler via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:

> Adam Williamson wrote:
> > From there, it's up to people where they see and respond to them.
>
> But every single announcement gets a reply on the mailing list (which is
> not
> properly threaded in KNode/Gmane, by the way) saying something like:
>
> > The discussion thread to provide feedback for this change proposal can
> be
> > found here https://yaddayadda.example.com/blablabla
>
> With this kind of wording, is it any wonder that people take that as
> mandatory and discussion on the mailing list has almost entirely drowned
> out? (The only Change that gets any discussion here seems to be the Plasma
> 6
> one, and only because it contains a completely outrageous downstream-only
> change hidden in the fine print, silently killing Plasma X11 support.)
>

Hi Kevin,

Sorry if my wording was giving off a mandatory feel, that was not my
intention at all! I took the initiative to respond to each announcement
email I was sending with this reply to try to help move the discussion over
to discourse, as per the decision made back in May to try that approach for
the change proposals to make it easier for folks to find the threads
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/6ASYG2TSI3EUPL24AP65XJACUUODA4RT/
I thought I was being helpful, again apologies for any misinterpretation of
intent!


>
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>


-- 

Aoife Moloney

Product Owner

Community Platform Engineering Team

Red Hat EMEA 

Communications House

Cork Road

Waterford

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Schedule for Today's FESCo Meeting (2023-09-14)

[Fabio Valentini]

On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 6:19 PM Neal Gompa  wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 12:14 PM David Cantrell  wrote:
> >
> > On 9/14/23 12:10, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 12:02 PM Adam Williamson
> > >  wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, 2023-09-14 at 17:19 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > >>> Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
> > >>> FESCo meeting Thursday at 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-2 on
> > >>> irc.libera.chat.
> > >>
> > >> This is the same time as the go/no-go meeting for Beta, which seems
> > >> unfortunate. Have we always had this clash? I don't recall.
> > >
> > > No. This is the first cycle that FESCo is on Thursday instead of Tuesday.
> > >
> > > We should try to move FESCo's meeting back to Tuesday if we can.
> >
> > I agree, but for today I think cancelling the FESCo meeting in favor of
> > the go/no-go meeting is the better option.
> >
>
> I'm fine with that.

I was not aware of the collision with the GONOGO meeting 
The only item on the schedule is not particularly urgent, so I agree
that cancelling today's meeting would be preferable.

→ MEETING CANCELLED

I cannot commit to chairing next week's meeting though, so we will
need to find somebody else to 晴 instead.

Fabio
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Schedule for Today's FESCo Meeting (2023-09-14)

[Neal Gompa]

On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 12:14 PM David Cantrell  wrote:
>
> On 9/14/23 12:10, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 12:02 PM Adam Williamson
> >  wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, 2023-09-14 at 17:19 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >>> Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
> >>> FESCo meeting Thursday at 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-2 on
> >>> irc.libera.chat.
> >>
> >> This is the same time as the go/no-go meeting for Beta, which seems
> >> unfortunate. Have we always had this clash? I don't recall.
> >
> > No. This is the first cycle that FESCo is on Thursday instead of Tuesday.
> >
> > We should try to move FESCo's meeting back to Tuesday if we can.
>
> I agree, but for today I think cancelling the FESCo meeting in favor of
> the go/no-go meeting is the better option.
>

I'm fine with that.



-- 
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: F40 Change Proposal: KDE Plasma 6 (System Wide)

[Neal Gompa]

On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 11:56 AM Ian Pilcher  wrote:
>
> On 9/13/23 12:52, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> >> For Fedora Linux, the transition to KDE Plasma 6 will also include
> >> dropping support for the X11 session entirely, leaving only Plasma Wayland
> >> as the sole offered desktop mode.
> >
> > Huh?! Why?! KDE upstream is still supporting X11 in Plasma 6. I see no
> > reason to force Wayland upon all users. I do not want Wayland on my desktop
> > (it is already enough of a pain that it is forced upon us by Plasma Mobile
> > on the PinePhone) and I will have to switch to another distribution and
> > orphan all my packages if this happens.
>
> There are critical pieces of functionality (e.g. screen sharing) that
> still don't work reliably on Wayland.
>

I am interested in learning where you're seeing screen sharing issues
today. The main one people bring up with me is video conferencing
systems, and because of completely unrelated reasons, I've been on a
binge of using a variety of them.

On my Plasma Wayland environment using Firefox (v117 from Fedora), I
was able to successfully use the following conferencing platforms with
screen sharing:

* Google Meet
* Jitsi Meet
* Big Blue Button

I have additionally verified using Google Chrome (v116 from Google),
that I was able to successfully use the following platforms with
screen sharing:

* Google Meet
* Jitsi Meet
* Big Blue Button
* Microsoft Teams
* Amazon Chime
* Cisco WebEx
* Zoom

Special note about Zoom: if you're using the desktop application,
there is a small workaround required: it needs to currently be tricked
into thinking it's running on GNOME to run the Wayland support code.
This was not needed for a short time, but for some reason, they put it
back.

To fix this, make a copy of the Zoom desktop file in
`/usr/share/applications` and put it in `~/.local/share/applications`,
then edit the `Exec=` line in the new file to prepend
`XDG_CURRENT_DESKTOP=GNOME` to the Zoom binary call. That will allow
the Wayland code to work. The code works fine on KDE Plasma, since it
uses the xdg-desktop-portal system. If you're a customer of Zoom,
please complain to them. Alas, I no longer am, so I have no stick I
can wave to get them to fix things anymore.




--
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Schedule for Today's FESCo Meeting (2023-09-14)

[David Cantrell]

On 9/14/23 12:10, Neal Gompa wrote:

On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 12:02 PM Adam Williamson
 wrote:


On Thu, 2023-09-14 at 17:19 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Thursday at 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-2 on
irc.libera.chat.


This is the same time as the go/no-go meeting for Beta, which seems
unfortunate. Have we always had this clash? I don't recall.


No. This is the first cycle that FESCo is on Thursday instead of Tuesday.

We should try to move FESCo's meeting back to Tuesday if we can.


I agree, but for today I think cancelling the FESCo meeting in favor of 
the go/no-go meeting is the better option.


--
David Cantrell 
Red Hat, Inc. | Boston, MA | EST5EDT
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Schedule for Today's FESCo Meeting (2023-09-14)

[Neal Gompa]

On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 12:02 PM Adam Williamson
 wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2023-09-14 at 17:19 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
> > FESCo meeting Thursday at 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-2 on
> > irc.libera.chat.
>
> This is the same time as the go/no-go meeting for Beta, which seems
> unfortunate. Have we always had this clash? I don't recall.

No. This is the first cycle that FESCo is on Thursday instead of Tuesday.

We should try to move FESCo's meeting back to Tuesday if we can.



-- 
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Schedule for Today's FESCo Meeting (2023-09-14)

[Adam Williamson]

On Thu, 2023-09-14 at 17:19 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
> FESCo meeting Thursday at 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-2 on
> irc.libera.chat.

This is the same time as the go/no-go meeting for Beta, which seems
unfortunate. Have we always had this clash? I don't recall.
-- 
Adam Williamson (he/him/his)
Fedora QA
Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @ad...@fosstodon.org
https://www.happyassassin.net



___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: An update on RHEL moving to issues.redhat.com

[Adam Williamson]

On Thu, 2023-09-14 at 14:50 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 2:42 PM Colin Walters  wrote:
> > 
> > On Wed, Sep 13, 2023, at 1:44 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 09:20:09AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > > IIRC it was a condition of that proposal that we wind up on a hosted
> > > > version of the *open source* release of gitlab, which is something we
> > > > managed to talk gitlab into doing for us. IMBW, though, it was a while
> > > > ago.
> > > 
> > > Short version is: yes, we did talk them into that with an informal plan, 
> > > and
> > > then someone higher up at gitlab pulled the plug on the idea.
> > 
> > FWIW I interact with pagure rarely enough that it is somewhat painful to 
> > context switch each time.  I accept having to deal with both github and 
> > gitlab, but going from 2 to 3 has a real cost, particularly around things 
> > like CI systems.
> 
> Switch GitLab and Pagure in that statement and I could say the exact same 
> thing.
> 
> Personally, I find the Pagure UI (and GitHub) to be much cleaner and
> easier to navigate than the UX mess that is GitLab ...
> I even find fully FOSS alternatives like Forgejo (Codeberg) *much*
> easier to use than GitLab.

UI is one thing, but Colin's not wrong about CI.

Love Github or hate it, Github Actions is a pretty strong CI
implementation that is very easy to set up. I haven't personally set up
CI for a Gitlab repo yet, but I believe it's also relatively simple
there.

Doing it for a non-dist-git Pagure project is not *terrible*, but it
involves a lot more finicky steps than doing it on Github, including
waiting for someone to merge a pull request you have to file halfway
through:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Zuul-based-ci#How_to_attach_a_Pagure_repository_on_Zuul

and you don't have access to something like the Github Actions library
of setup steps to configure your environment. It would be a significant
enhancement to Pagure if this experience could be made smoother for
non-dist-git projects.

On the whole, I do mostly like Pagure's UI too, but it is missing some
capabilities compared to much more deeply-funded projects (not a
surprise).
-- 
Adam Williamson (he/him/his)
Fedora QA
Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @ad...@fosstodon.org
https://www.happyassassin.net



___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: F40 Change Proposal: KDE Plasma 6 (System Wide)

[Ian Pilcher]

On 9/13/23 12:52, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:

For Fedora Linux, the transition to KDE Plasma 6 will also include
dropping support for the X11 session entirely, leaving only Plasma Wayland
as the sole offered desktop mode.


Huh?! Why?! KDE upstream is still supporting X11 in Plasma 6. I see no
reason to force Wayland upon all users. I do not want Wayland on my desktop
(it is already enough of a pain that it is forced upon us by Plasma Mobile
on the PinePhone) and I will have to switch to another distribution and
orphan all my packages if this happens.


There are critical pieces of functionality (e.g. screen sharing) that
still don't work reliably on Wayland.

--

Google  Where SkyNet meets Idiocracy


___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Schedule for Today's FESCo Meeting (2023-09-14)

[Fabio Valentini]

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Thursday at 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-2 on
irc.libera.chat.

Note that the IRC <-> Matrix bridge is still disabled, so to
join the meeting, please dust off your IRC client of choice.

To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto

or run:
  date -d '2023-09-14 17:00 UTC'

Links to all issues to be discussed can be found at:
https://pagure.io/fesco/report/meeting_agenda

= Discussed and Voted in the Ticket =

Consider invoking the contingency plan for
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/AnacondaWebUIforFedoraWorkstation
(revert to the old UI)
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3066
APPROVED (+7, 0, -0) on the fast track

= Followups =

#3059 F39 incomplete changes: 100% complete deadline
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3059

= New business =

N/A

= Open Floor =

For more complete details, please visit each individual
issue.  The report of the agenda items can be found at
https://pagure.io/fesco/report/meeting_agenda

If you would like to add something to this agenda, you can
reply to this e-mail, file a new issue at
https://pagure.io/fesco, e-mail me directly, or bring it
up at the end of the meeting, during the open floor topic. Note
that added topics may be deferred until the following meeting.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[EPEL-devel] Re: Take the EPEL user and contributor survey 2023!

[Diego Herrera]

> The link is incorrect and should be 
> https://fedoraproject.limequery.com/epelsurvey2023

Yes, my mistake. The correct link is
https://fedoraproject.limequery.com/epelsurvey2023 :)

> None of them is available, it seems.

We had some problems with Fedora's LimeSurvey account that limited the
amount of responses we could receive per day. This problem has been
addressed, so you should be able to take the survey without problems
now.

Just to clarify on this, none of the already made entries were lost in
this process, so we do not believe it will be necessary to extend the
duration of the survey for now.


On Sat, Sep 2, 2023 at 6:26 AM Michael J Gruber  wrote:
>
> Am Fr., 1. Sept. 2023 um 22:09 Uhr schrieb Stephen Smoogen
> :
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 1 Sept 2023 at 16:03, Diego Herrera  wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello, everyone
> >>
> >> The Fedora EPEL SIG is asking for feedback to improve EPEL via this survey!
> >>
> >> * https://fedoraproject.limequery.com/2023
> >>
> >
> > The link is incorrect and should be 
> > https://fedoraproject.limequery.com/epelsurvey2023
> >
> None of them is available, it seems.
>
> Cheers
> Michael
> ___
> epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: An update on RHEL moving to issues.redhat.com

[Christopher Klooz]

It used to be different, but since GitLab changed their UI, I also would 
no longer choose it over alternatives (so, unfortunately: +1 for the UX 
mess & the preference for alternatives). The remaining advantage of 
GitLab is the time-effective drag/drop issue board, but that cannot 
balance the remaining mess... However, pagure has imho its own UX mess 
at some places, depending on what it is used for (while GitHub does not 
follow security best-practices in some respects)... My personal 
preference are gitea-based services, such as codeberg or so.


On 9/14/23 15:43, Peter Boy wrote:



Am 14.09.2023 um 14:50 schrieb Fabio Valentini :

Personally, I find the Pagure UI (and GitHub) to be much cleaner and
easier to navigate than the UX mess that is GitLab …

+++1





--
Peter Boy
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Pboy
p...@fedoraproject.org

Timezone: CET (UTC+1) / CEST /UTC+2)

Fedora Server Edition Working Group member
Fedora Docs team contributor and board member
Java developer and enthusiast


___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: An update on RHEL moving to issues.redhat.com

[mkolman]

On Thu, 2023-09-14 at 14:50 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 2:42 PM Colin Walters 
> wrote:
> > 
> > On Wed, Sep 13, 2023, at 1:44 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 09:20:09AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > > IIRC it was a condition of that proposal that we wind up on a
> > > > hosted
> > > > version of the *open source* release of gitlab, which is
> > > > something we
> > > > managed to talk gitlab into doing for us. IMBW, though, it was
> > > > a while
> > > > ago.
> > > 
> > > Short version is: yes, we did talk them into that with an
> > > informal plan, and
> > > then someone higher up at gitlab pulled the plug on the idea.
> > 
> > FWIW I interact with pagure rarely enough that it is somewhat
> > painful to context switch each time.  I accept having to deal with
> > both github and gitlab, but going from 2 to 3 has a real cost,
> > particularly around things like CI systems.
> 
> Switch GitLab and Pagure in that statement and I could say the exact
> same thing.
> 
> Personally, I find the Pagure UI (and GitHub) to be much cleaner and
> easier to navigate than the UX mess that is GitLab ...
> I even find fully FOSS alternatives like Forgejo (Codeberg) *much*
> easier to use than GitLab.
Agreed, IMHO UI wise:

GitHub >= Pagure > GitLab

> 
> Fabio
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[rpms/perl-Net-SMTP-SSL] PR #1: Package tests; Modernize spec

[Jitka Plesnikova]

jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Net-SMTP-SSL` that 
you are following.

Merged pull-request:

``
Package tests; Modernize spec
``

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Net-SMTP-SSL/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[rpms/perl-Net-SMTP-SSL] PR #1: Package tests; Modernize spec

[Jitka Plesnikova]

jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Net-SMTP-SSL` 
that you are following:
``
Package tests; Modernize spec
``

To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Net-SMTP-SSL/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: An update on RHEL moving to issues.redhat.com

[Peter Boy]

> Am 14.09.2023 um 14:50 schrieb Fabio Valentini :
> 
> Personally, I find the Pagure UI (and GitHub) to be much cleaner and
> easier to navigate than the UX mess that is GitLab …

+++1





--
Peter Boy
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Pboy
p...@fedoraproject.org

Timezone: CET (UTC+1) / CEST /UTC+2)

Fedora Server Edition Working Group member
Fedora Docs team contributor and board member
Java developer and enthusiast


___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[rpms/perl-HTML-Tagset] PR #1: Package tests; Modernize spec

[Jitka Plesnikova]

jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-HTML-Tagset` that you 
are following.

Merged pull-request:

``
Package tests; Modernize spec
``

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTML-Tagset/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Fedora Linux 38 Beta Go/No-Go meeting today (2023-09-14)

[Adam Williamson]

The Fedora Linux 39 Beta Go/No-Go[1] meeting is scheduled for Thursday
14 September at 1700 UTC in #fedora-meeting on libera.chat[2]. At this
time, we will determine the status of the F39 Beta for the 19 September
target date #1[3]. For more information about the Go/No-Go meeting, see
the wiki[4].

Please note the IRC<->Matrix bridge is down at present, so you must
join IRC to attend the meeting, using a native client or the webchat
link below.

[1] https://calendar.fedoraproject.org/meeting/10583/
[2] https://web.libera.chat/#fedora-meeting
[3] https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-39/f-39-key-tasks.html
[4] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Go_No_Go_Meeting
-- 
Adam Williamson (he/him/his)
Fedora QA
Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @ad...@fosstodon.org
https://www.happyassassin.net
___
devel-announce mailing list -- devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2238817] perl-Data-Visitor for EL9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2238817



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-bc14431fd8 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-bc14431fd8


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2238817

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202238817%23c5
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Fedora 39 compose report: 20230914.n.0 changes

[Fedora Branched Report]

OLD: Fedora-39-20230913.n.0
NEW: Fedora-39-20230914.n.0

= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images:  1
Added packages:  0
Dropped packages:4
Upgraded packages:   0
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages:  0 B
Size of dropped packages:577.01 KiB
Size of upgraded packages:   0 B
Size of downgraded packages: 0 B

Size change of upgraded packages:   0 B
Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B

= ADDED IMAGES =

= DROPPED IMAGES =
Image: KDE live aarch64
Path: Spins/aarch64/iso/Fedora-KDE-Live-aarch64-39-20230913.n.0.iso

= ADDED PACKAGES =

= DROPPED PACKAGES =
Package: kdeaddons-3.5.10-33.fc39
Summary: K Desktop Environment - Plugins
RPMs:kdeaddons-atlantikdesigner
Size:334.92 KiB

Package: rust-libadwaita0.4-0.4.4-1.fc39
Summary: Rust bindings for libadwaita
RPMs:rust-libadwaita0.4+default-devel rust-libadwaita0.4+dox-devel 
rust-libadwaita0.4+gtk_v4_10-devel rust-libadwaita0.4+gtk_v4_2-devel 
rust-libadwaita0.4+gtk_v4_4-devel rust-libadwaita0.4+gtk_v4_6-devel 
rust-libadwaita0.4+gtk_v4_8-devel rust-libadwaita0.4+v1_1-devel 
rust-libadwaita0.4+v1_2-devel rust-libadwaita0.4+v1_3-devel 
rust-libadwaita0.4+v1_4-devel rust-libadwaita0.4-devel
Size:178.86 KiB

Package: rust-ouroboros0.15-0.15.6-1.fc39
Summary: Easy, safe self-referential struct generation
RPMs:rust-ouroboros0.15+default-devel rust-ouroboros0.15+std-devel 
rust-ouroboros0.15-devel
Size:33.26 KiB

Package: rust-pangocairo0.15-0.15.1-3.fc39
Summary: Rust bindings for the PangoCairo library
RPMs:rust-pangocairo0.15+default-devel rust-pangocairo0.15+dox-devel 
rust-pangocairo0.15-devel
Size:29.97 KiB


= UPGRADED PACKAGES =

= DOWNGRADED PACKAGES =
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: An update on RHEL moving to issues.redhat.com

[Fabio Valentini]

On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 2:42 PM Colin Walters  wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2023, at 1:44 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 09:20:09AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >> IIRC it was a condition of that proposal that we wind up on a hosted
> >> version of the *open source* release of gitlab, which is something we
> >> managed to talk gitlab into doing for us. IMBW, though, it was a while
> >> ago.
> >
> > Short version is: yes, we did talk them into that with an informal plan, and
> > then someone higher up at gitlab pulled the plug on the idea.
>
> FWIW I interact with pagure rarely enough that it is somewhat painful to 
> context switch each time.  I accept having to deal with both github and 
> gitlab, but going from 2 to 3 has a real cost, particularly around things 
> like CI systems.

Switch GitLab and Pagure in that statement and I could say the exact same thing.

Personally, I find the Pagure UI (and GitHub) to be much cleaner and
easier to navigate than the UX mess that is GitLab ...
I even find fully FOSS alternatives like Forgejo (Codeberg) *much*
easier to use than GitLab.

Fabio
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[rpms/perl-HTML-Tagset] PR #1: Package tests; Modernize spec

[Jitka Plesnikova]

jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-HTML-Tagset` that 
you are following:
``
Package tests; Modernize spec
``

To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTML-Tagset/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: An update on RHEL moving to issues.redhat.com

[Colin Walters]

On Wed, Sep 13, 2023, at 1:44 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 09:20:09AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> IIRC it was a condition of that proposal that we wind up on a hosted
>> version of the *open source* release of gitlab, which is something we
>> managed to talk gitlab into doing for us. IMBW, though, it was a while
>> ago.
>
> Short version is: yes, we did talk them into that with an informal plan, and
> then someone higher up at gitlab pulled the plug on the idea.

FWIW I interact with pagure rarely enough that it is somewhat painful to 
context switch each time.  I accept having to deal with both github and gitlab, 
but going from 2 to 3 has a real cost, particularly around things like CI 
systems.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: The new Change discussion process is painful

[Neal Gompa]

On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 6:50 AM Vít Ondruch  wrote:
>
>
> Dne 14. 09. 23 v 11:15 Emmanuel Seyman napsal(a):
> > * Vít Ondruch [14/09/2023 10:50] :
> >> Apart from documentation, where this was announced? On Discourse? Because I
> >> don't remember any email about this change.
> > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/Z2T5WKUTHNLS2SVCVAWNYYRIBK3NGF32/
>
>
> Thank, but this was announcing intent to change something, not
> announcement of something approved which is going to change. Admittedly,
> I have likely seen this. But there were action items such as: "Because
> altering the Changes process is a FESCo decision, I’ll file a ticket
> about that shortly." I was also able to find the FESCo ticket:
>
> https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2989
>
> But where was the ticket itself and the voting result announced?
>

It was done on that ticket.

The announcement was done after the May 9th FESCo meeting:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/6ASYG2TSI3EUPL24AP65XJACUUODA4RT/



-- 
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[rpms/perl-Filter-Simple] PR #1: Package tests; Modernize spec

[Jitka Plesnikova]

jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Filter-Simple` that 
you are following.

Merged pull-request:

``
Package tests; Modernize spec
``

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Filter-Simple/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[rpms/perl-Filter-Simple] PR #1: Package tests; Modernize spec

[Jitka Plesnikova]

jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Filter-Simple` 
that you are following:
``
Package tests; Modernize spec
``

To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Filter-Simple/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2238875] perl-MCE-1.889 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2238875



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-e303f44cf5 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 39.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-e303f44cf5


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2238875

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202238875%23c3
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

pghmcfc pushed to rpms/perl-MCE-Shared (f39). "Update to 1.886 (..more)"

[notifications]

Notification time stamped 2023-09-14 11:30:36 UTC

From 9e93cd20d1fd12324db1cae503ac16c803a70a07 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth 
Date: Sep 14 2023 11:11:23 +
Subject: Update to 1.886


- New upstream release 1.886
  - Add Android support; this required moving MCE::Shared::Base::Common out of
MCE::Shared::Base to separate file MCE::Shared::Common
  - Bump MCE dependency to 1.889

---

diff --git a/perl-MCE-Shared.spec b/perl-MCE-Shared.spec
index c869b80..d72b28f 100644
--- a/perl-MCE-Shared.spec
+++ b/perl-MCE-Shared.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:  perl-MCE-Shared
-Version:   1.885
-Release:   2%{?dist}
+Version:   1.886
+Release:   1%{?dist}
 Summary:   MCE extension for sharing data, supporting threads and processes
 License:   GPL-1.0-or-later OR Artistic-1.0-Perl
 URL:   https://metacpan.org/release/MCE-Shared
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ BuildRequires:perl(constant)
 BuildRequires: perl(Errno)
 BuildRequires: perl(if)
 BuildRequires: perl(IO::Handle)
-BuildRequires: perl(MCE) >= 1.886
+BuildRequires: perl(MCE) >= 1.889
 BuildRequires: perl(MCE::Mutex)
 BuildRequires: perl(MCE::Signal)
 BuildRequires: perl(MCE::Util)
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ BuildRequires:perl(Test::More) >= 0.88
 BuildRequires: perl(utf8)
 # Dependencies
 Requires:  perl(IO::FDPass) >= 1.2
-Requires:  perl(MCE) >= 1.886
+Requires:  perl(MCE) >= 1.889
 Requires:  perl(overloading)
 Requires:  perl(POSIX)
 Requires:  perl(Storable) >= 2.04
@@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/MCE::Shared::Array.3*
 %{_mandir}/man3/MCE::Shared::Base.3*
 %{_mandir}/man3/MCE::Shared::Cache.3*
+%{_mandir}/man3/MCE::Shared::Common.3*
 %{_mandir}/man3/MCE::Shared::Condvar.3*
 %{_mandir}/man3/MCE::Shared::Handle.3*
 %{_mandir}/man3/MCE::Shared::Hash.3*
@@ -92,6 +93,12 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/MCE::Shared::Server.3*
 
 %changelog
+* Thu Sep 14 2023 Paul Howarth  - 1.886-1
+- Update to 1.886
+  - Add Android support; this required moving MCE::Shared::Base::Common out of
+MCE::Shared::Base to separate file MCE::Shared::Common
+  - Bump MCE dependency to 1.889
+
 * Thu Jul 20 2023 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1.885-2
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_39_Mass_Rebuild
 
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 20ce474..bc914fd 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-SHA512 (MCE-Shared-1.885.tar.gz) = 
d3bb6d94260987387c958ab4324e7d69d53b5e7895f6e925fcdc96aacf785d639fed3ce12294f2b7caea50757b03f9b04ec5c7f8e57ea4c2932d9a455e9c9a81
+SHA512 (MCE-Shared-1.886.tar.gz) = 
d81dcf92f251a8163809a5c4f51e06147b150c14865707d38dd70de825c021539a09c84352fe43a43ab681052084e6b06bfef47429fcd901c0ee4765474e64a0



https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-MCE-Shared/c/9e93cd20d1fd12324db1cae503ac16c803a70a07?branch=f39
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20230914.n.0 changes

[Fedora Rawhide Report]

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230913.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230914.n.0

= SUMMARY =
Added images:5
Dropped images:  4
Added packages:  15
Dropped packages:4
Upgraded packages:   173
Downgraded packages: 2

Size of added packages:  3.34 MiB
Size of dropped packages:577.01 KiB
Size of upgraded packages:   3.77 GiB
Size of downgraded packages: 107.61 KiB

Size change of upgraded packages:   76.76 MiB
Size change of downgraded packages: -44 B

= ADDED IMAGES =
Image: Onyx dvd-ostree x86_64
Path: Onyx/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Onyx-ostree-x86_64-Rawhide-20230914.n.0.iso
Image: Kinoite dvd-ostree x86_64
Path: Kinoite/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Kinoite-ostree-x86_64-Rawhide-20230914.n.0.iso
Image: Mate live x86_64
Path: Spins/x86_64/iso/Fedora-MATE_Compiz-Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20230914.n.0.iso
Image: Kinoite dvd-ostree ppc64le
Path: Kinoite/ppc64le/iso/Fedora-Kinoite-ostree-ppc64le-Rawhide-20230914.n.0.iso
Image: LXQt live aarch64
Path: Spins/aarch64/iso/Fedora-LXQt-Live-aarch64-Rawhide-20230914.n.0.iso

= DROPPED IMAGES =
Image: Sericea dvd-ostree x86_64
Path: Sericea/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Sericea-ostree-x86_64-Rawhide-20230913.n.0.iso
Image: Kinoite dvd-ostree aarch64
Path: Kinoite/aarch64/iso/Fedora-Kinoite-ostree-aarch64-Rawhide-20230913.n.0.iso
Image: i3 live aarch64
Path: Spins/aarch64/iso/Fedora-i3-Live-aarch64-Rawhide-20230913.n.0.iso
Image: KDE live aarch64
Path: Spins/aarch64/iso/Fedora-KDE-Live-aarch64-Rawhide-20230913.n.0.iso

= ADDED PACKAGES =
Package: golang-github-nats-io-jwt-2-2.5.0-1.fc40
Summary: JWT tokens signed using NKeys for Ed25519 for the NATS ecosystem
RPMs:compat-golang-github-nats-io-jwt-2-devel golang-github-nats-io-jwt-2 
golang-github-nats-io-jwt-devel
Size:205.45 KiB

Package: python-krb5-0.5.1-1.fc40
Summary: Kerberos API bindings for Python
RPMs:python3-krb5
Size:1.97 MiB

Package: python-scitokens-1.8.1-1.fc40
Summary: SciToken reference implementation library
RPMs:python3-scitokens
Size:72.86 KiB

Package: reStream-1.2.0-1.fc40
Summary: Stream your reMarkable screen over SSH
RPMs:reStream
Size:15.26 KiB

Package: rust-annotate-snippets0.6-0.6.1-1.fc40
Summary: Library for building code annotations
RPMs:rust-annotate-snippets0.6+ansi_term-devel 
rust-annotate-snippets0.6+color-devel rust-annotate-snippets0.6+default-devel 
rust-annotate-snippets0.6-devel
Size:60.30 KiB

Package: rust-build-context-0.1.1-1.fc40
Summary: Make build environment/target information available as constants
RPMs:rust-build-context+default-devel rust-build-context-devel
Size:22.33 KiB

Package: rust-chrono-tz-build-0.2.0-1.fc40
Summary: Internal build script for chrono-tz
RPMs:rust-chrono-tz-build+case-insensitive-devel 
rust-chrono-tz-build+default-devel rust-chrono-tz-build+filter-by-regex-devel 
rust-chrono-tz-build+regex-devel rust-chrono-tz-build+uncased-devel 
rust-chrono-tz-build-devel
Size:54.12 KiB

Package: rust-color-print-0.3.5-1.fc40
Summary: Colorize and stylize strings for terminal at compile-time, by using an 
HTML-like syntax
RPMs:rust-color-print+default-devel rust-color-print+lazy_static-devel 
rust-color-print+terminfo-devel rust-color-print+terminfo_crate-devel 
rust-color-print-devel
Size:48.74 KiB

Package: rust-color-print-proc-macro-0.3.5-1.fc40
Summary: Implementation for the package color-print
RPMs:rust-color-print-proc-macro+default-devel 
rust-color-print-proc-macro+terminfo-devel rust-color-print-proc-macro-devel
Size:49.78 KiB

Package: rust-document-features-0.2.7-1.fc40
Summary: Extract documentation for the feature flags from comments in Cargo.toml
RPMs:rust-document-features+default-devel 
rust-document-features+self-test-devel rust-document-features-devel
Size:34.82 KiB

Package: rust-impl-more-0.1.6-1.fc40
Summary: Concise, declarative trait implementation macros
RPMs:rust-impl-more+default-devel rust-impl-more-devel
Size:26.93 KiB

Package: rust-libcryptsetup-rs0.8-0.8.0-1.fc40
Summary: High level Rust bindings for libcryptsetup
RPMs:rust-libcryptsetup-rs0.8+default-devel 
rust-libcryptsetup-rs0.8+mutex-devel rust-libcryptsetup-rs0.8-devel
Size:69.82 KiB

Package: rust-remain-0.2.11-1.fc40
Summary: Compile-time checks that an enum, struct, or match is written in 
sorted order
RPMs:rust-remain+default-devel rust-remain-devel
Size:41.22 KiB

Package: rust-spdx-0.10.2-1.fc40
Summary: Helper crate for SPDX expressions
RPMs:rust-spdx+default-devel rust-spdx+text-devel rust-spdx-devel
Size:610.14 KiB

Package: rust-unidecode-0.3.0-1.fc40
Summary: Pure ASCII transliterations of Unicode strings
RPMs:rust-unidecode+default-devel rust-unidecode-devel
Size:82.14 KiB


= DROPPED PACKAGES =
Package: kdeaddons-3.5.10-33.fc39
Summary: K Desktop Environment - Plugins
RPMs:kdeaddons-atlantikdesigner
Size:334.92 KiB

Package: rust-libadwaita0.4-0.4.4-1.fc40
Summary: Rust bindings for libadwaita
RPMs:rust

[rpms/perl-Digest-SHA1] PR #1: Package tests; Modernize spec

[Jitka Plesnikova]

jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Digest-SHA1` that you 
are following.

Merged pull-request:

``
Package tests; Modernize spec
``

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Digest-SHA1/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[rpms/perl-Digest-SHA1] PR #1: Package tests; Modernize spec

[Jitka Plesnikova]

jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Digest-SHA1` that 
you are following:
``
Package tests; Modernize spec
``

To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Digest-SHA1/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2238817] perl-Data-Visitor for EL9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2238817



--- Comment #4 from Paul Howarth  ---
EL-8:
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/56325 (perl-Tie-ToObject)
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/56326 (perl-Data-Visitor)

I added you as admin to both packages.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2238817

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202238817%23c4
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

pghmcfc pushed to rpms/perl-MCE-Shared (rawhide). "Update to 1.886 (..more)"

[notifications]

Notification time stamped 2023-09-14 11:13:10 UTC

From 9e93cd20d1fd12324db1cae503ac16c803a70a07 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth 
Date: Sep 14 2023 11:11:23 +
Subject: Update to 1.886


- New upstream release 1.886
  - Add Android support; this required moving MCE::Shared::Base::Common out of
MCE::Shared::Base to separate file MCE::Shared::Common
  - Bump MCE dependency to 1.889

---

diff --git a/perl-MCE-Shared.spec b/perl-MCE-Shared.spec
index c869b80..d72b28f 100644
--- a/perl-MCE-Shared.spec
+++ b/perl-MCE-Shared.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:  perl-MCE-Shared
-Version:   1.885
-Release:   2%{?dist}
+Version:   1.886
+Release:   1%{?dist}
 Summary:   MCE extension for sharing data, supporting threads and processes
 License:   GPL-1.0-or-later OR Artistic-1.0-Perl
 URL:   https://metacpan.org/release/MCE-Shared
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ BuildRequires:perl(constant)
 BuildRequires: perl(Errno)
 BuildRequires: perl(if)
 BuildRequires: perl(IO::Handle)
-BuildRequires: perl(MCE) >= 1.886
+BuildRequires: perl(MCE) >= 1.889
 BuildRequires: perl(MCE::Mutex)
 BuildRequires: perl(MCE::Signal)
 BuildRequires: perl(MCE::Util)
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ BuildRequires:perl(Test::More) >= 0.88
 BuildRequires: perl(utf8)
 # Dependencies
 Requires:  perl(IO::FDPass) >= 1.2
-Requires:  perl(MCE) >= 1.886
+Requires:  perl(MCE) >= 1.889
 Requires:  perl(overloading)
 Requires:  perl(POSIX)
 Requires:  perl(Storable) >= 2.04
@@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/MCE::Shared::Array.3*
 %{_mandir}/man3/MCE::Shared::Base.3*
 %{_mandir}/man3/MCE::Shared::Cache.3*
+%{_mandir}/man3/MCE::Shared::Common.3*
 %{_mandir}/man3/MCE::Shared::Condvar.3*
 %{_mandir}/man3/MCE::Shared::Handle.3*
 %{_mandir}/man3/MCE::Shared::Hash.3*
@@ -92,6 +93,12 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/MCE::Shared::Server.3*
 
 %changelog
+* Thu Sep 14 2023 Paul Howarth  - 1.886-1
+- Update to 1.886
+  - Add Android support; this required moving MCE::Shared::Base::Common out of
+MCE::Shared::Base to separate file MCE::Shared::Common
+  - Bump MCE dependency to 1.889
+
 * Thu Jul 20 2023 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1.885-2
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_39_Mass_Rebuild
 
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 20ce474..bc914fd 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-SHA512 (MCE-Shared-1.885.tar.gz) = 
d3bb6d94260987387c958ab4324e7d69d53b5e7895f6e925fcdc96aacf785d639fed3ce12294f2b7caea50757b03f9b04ec5c7f8e57ea4c2932d9a455e9c9a81
+SHA512 (MCE-Shared-1.886.tar.gz) = 
d81dcf92f251a8163809a5c4f51e06147b150c14865707d38dd70de825c021539a09c84352fe43a43ab681052084e6b06bfef47429fcd901c0ee4765474e64a0



https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-MCE-Shared/c/9e93cd20d1fd12324db1cae503ac16c803a70a07?branch=rawhide
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2238875] perl-MCE-1.889 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2238875

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version||perl-MCE-1.889-1.fc40
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
 Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Last Closed||2023-09-14 11:04:36



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-fade4dbe8d has been pushed to the Fedora 40 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2238875

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202238875%23c2
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2238875] perl-MCE-1.889 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2238875

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |MODIFIED



--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-fade4dbe8d has been submitted as an update to Fedora 40.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-fade4dbe8d


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2238875

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202238875%23c1
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: The new Change discussion process is painful

[Vít Ondruch]

Dne 14. 09. 23 v 11:15 Emmanuel Seyman napsal(a):

* Vít Ondruch [14/09/2023 10:50] :

Apart from documentation, where this was announced? On Discourse? Because I
don't remember any email about this change.

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/Z2T5WKUTHNLS2SVCVAWNYYRIBK3NGF32/



Thank, but this was announcing intent to change something, not 
announcement of something approved which is going to change. Admittedly, 
I have likely seen this. But there were action items such as: "Because 
altering the Changes process is a FESCo decision, I’ll file a ticket 
about that shortly." I was also able to find the FESCo ticket:


https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2989

But where was the ticket itself and the voting result announced?


Vít



OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: F40 Change Proposal: KDE Plasma 6 (System Wide)

[Ian McInerney via devel]

On Thu, 14 Sep 2023, 09:24 Michael J Gruber,  wrote:

> Am Mi., 13. Sept. 2023 um 23:29 Uhr schrieb Neal Gompa  >:
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 5:24 PM Fabio Valentini 
> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 11:19 PM Steven A. Falco <
> stevenfa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > A question about this - the removal of X11 is listed on a change
> proposal for KDE.  Does the removal just apply to KDE or would it be
> distribution wide; i.e. affecting all desktops?
> > >
> > > I assume the following is not meant literally:
> > >
> > > """
> > > For Fedora Linux, the
> > > transition to KDE Plasma 6 will also include dropping support for the
> > > X11 session entirely, leaving only Plasma Wayland as the sole offered
> > > desktop mode.
> > > """
> > >
> > > I doubt that the intention is to drop X11 sessions entirely and make
> > > "Plasma Wayland" the only session available on Fedora *in general*,
> > > but rather that the "Plasma X11" session will be dropped, and that
> > > "Plasma Wayland" will be the only *Plasma* session available.
> > >
> >
> > Yes! Sorry if it's ambiguous, it's hard to write this to account for
> > all the ways it can be interpreted. This is scoped to the KDE Plasma
> > solution stack.
>
> The proposal is clearly about KDE plasma and *its* sessions. Or else
> "leaving only Plasma Wayland as the sole offered desktop mode" would
> have to mean the end of all other desktops on Fedora ;-)
>
> > Other desktops can and will make their own choices on the transition to
> Wayland.
>
> Rightly so. Fewer and fewer will pull in X11, and that's a good change.
>
> Now, if you (as in "they" - not  you Neal, obviously) see "change" and
> something Wayland has not worked in the past and you go ballistic
> about it then for you (as in "they") that formulation might be
> ambiguous. But if you take a breath or a step back or both then the
> proposal is crystal clear. At the same time, there is no way around it
> given upstream's directions.
>
> Talking of upstream: I see some upstreams giving up on Wayland
> support. Kicad was reported here, Scribus is another one. It's a
> surprising time to do that, but probably indicates toolkit issues or
> simply lack of people power. I hope we can help at least on the
> toolkit side. That would be time well spent - invested in the future
> of the platform.


The decision to not support Wayland in KiCad was taken because the graphics
stacks didn't have the features we relied on to provide the UI/UX wanted by
our users (mainly pointer warping and window positioning, but there maybe
others I can't recall now), and whenever we found discussions about having
those kind of things in upstream toolkits like GTK4/Wayland, it always
seemed to be greeted with responses that that seemed to convey "don't do
that, it is terrible UI/UX and you are idiots for wanting it. We [the
upstream devs] know exactly what every application should do and so you can
either do it our way or go away and shut up." So, we decided not to invest
anymore time or energy in this and just said "we don't support Wayland." I
don't know if the attitude of the upstream projects has changed or not, but
this previous response has soured our taste for doing work on it.

-Ian


Nobody will stop anyone from shipping a plasma-x11
> package (and it's ridiculous to try and read that into the proposal)
> or even a full stack plasma 5, but that will just drag out the
> transition that is happening nonetheless.
>
> Full disclosure: Writing this from F38/X11/i3 ;-)
> F39 should be a good release to try the switch (Wayland/sway for me),
> and in fact for some releases we have had dual session options now at
> least for Gnome and KDE (X11/Wayland) so that one could try and switch
> apps gradually. Reliance on WebRTC (and the switches i3/sway, st/foot
> etc) made me chicken out so far, but now is the time!
>
> Michael
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2238817] perl-Data-Visitor for EL9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2238817



--- Comment #3 from Xavier Bachelot  ---
Indeed, I'd be glad to help, please add me to both of them.
Also, I would need perl-Data-Visitor for EL8 as well, sorry for forgetting this
yesterday.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2238817

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202238817%23c3
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2238817] perl-Data-Visitor for EL9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2238817

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-d8b4edb69c has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-d8b4edb69c


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2238817

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202238817%23c2
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: F40 Change Proposal: KDE Plasma 6 (System Wide)

[Ian McInerney via devel]

On Thu, 14 Sep 2023, 00:17 Neal Gompa,  wrote:

> On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 7:02 PM Steven A. Falco 
> wrote:
> >
> > On 9/13/23 05:23 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > Right. And I want to stress we are not dropping support for X11
> > > applications. Anything running as an X client in a desktop should work
> > > as it has before.
> >
> > I'm not convinced KiCad will work in that scenario, so please let me
> summarize what I've read here, and please correct me if I have any of this
> wrong.
> >
> > The thing being removed is "Plasma(X11)", which is a native X11 stack;
> i.e. no Wayland or Xwayland is involved when using Plasma(X11).  This mode
> is well supported by KiCad, and additionally it works well with my
> multi-monitor setup.
> >
> > Should the change proposal be accepted, "Plasma(X11)" will be removed,
> leaving "Plasma(Wayland)" as the only available KDE mode.  Also, all X11
> applications will then be forced to use XWayland rather than X11, at least
> under KDE.
> >
> > Assuming my summary is correct, here are my personal problems:
> >
> > Problem 1: The KiCad team says they don't support XWayland (nor do they
> support pure Wayland) because of bugs.
> >
>
> From what I've read through the issues, the ultimate problem is in
> GTK, not wxWidgets, as there is in fact a supported Wayland protocol
> for mouse warping[1]. Does this issue exist when using wxQt instead of
> wxGTK? Admittedly, I'm not sure of the state of things with wxWidgets
> and the backends...
>
> [1]: https://wayland.app/protocols/pointer-constraints-unstable-v1
>
>
Speaking as a member of the KiCad core development team, I am not convinced
that extension will be easy to use. When I looked at it a few weeks ago, it
still seemed to have portability problems between compositors/WM
implementations. (See here for my conclusion
https://github.com/wxWidgets/wxWidgets/issues/23778#issuecomment-1680398578).
As a project, we already have to deal with enough problems from supporting
MSW, macOS and Linux that having to now workaround quirks in different
graphics stacks is not something we have the time or developer effort to
do. We would rather be actually creating the features all our users need
for their work instead of having to fight with the graphics stacks all the
time.

And aside from the mouse warping, we also want the ability to control where
windows are placed on the screen. We are a multi-window application, and
our users usually have a preferred setup for how the windows are arranged
on their screen. Right now, we can save/restore that for them, but my
understanding of the Wayland spec is that this is not allowed and so we are
at the mercy of the desktop to put the windows where it wants.

-Ian


> Problem 2: Plasma(Wayland) doesn't work with my multi-monitor setup.
> >
>
> Do you have a bug report filed at bugs.kde.org about your setup? The
> KDE folks can take a look and we can try to have things fixed in
> Plasma (in Plasma 5 today or Plasma 6 when it lands).
>
> > Conclusion: If there are remaining Fedora desktops using X11, I might be
> able to continue using Fedora, and I might be able to continue supporting
> KiCad, _assuming_ I'm willing to switch to another desktop.  Of course,
> after having used KDE for 20+ years, switching is not very appealing, nor
> is it very likely, frankly.
> >
>
> Part of the reason for filing this Change is to shake out these cases
> and make sure we can get them covered. For what it's worth, I want you
> to have a good experience on Plasma Wayland, and I'm happy to help try
> to facilitate that however I can.
>
>
> --
> 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[rpms/perl-Date-Calc-XS] PR #1: Package tests; Update license to SPDX format

[Jitka Plesnikova]

jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Date-Calc-XS` that 
you are following.

Merged pull-request:

``
Package tests; Update license to SPDX format
``

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Date-Calc-XS/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: The new Change discussion process is painful

[Emmanuel Seyman]

* Vít Ondruch [14/09/2023 10:50] :
>
> Apart from documentation, where this was announced? On Discourse? Because I
> don't remember any email about this change.

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/Z2T5WKUTHNLS2SVCVAWNYYRIBK3NGF32/

Emmanuel
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[rpms/perl-Date-Calc-XS] PR #1: Package tests; Update license to SPDX format

[Jitka Plesnikova]

jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Date-Calc-XS` 
that you are following:
``
Package tests; Update license to SPDX format
``

To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Date-Calc-XS/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[rpms/perl-Date-Calc] PR #1: Package tests; Modernize spec

[Jitka Plesnikova]

jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Date-Calc` that you 
are following.

Merged pull-request:

``
Package tests; Modernize spec
``

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Date-Calc/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: The new Change discussion process is painful

[Vít Ondruch]

Dne 13. 09. 23 v 20:22 Stephen Smoogen napsal(a):



On Wed, 13 Sept 2023 at 14:14, Adam Williamson 
 wrote:


On Wed, 2023-09-13 at 20:07 +0200, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Adam Williamson wrote:
> > From there, it's up to people where they see and respond to them.
>
> But every single announcement gets a reply on the mailing list
(which is not
> properly threaded in KNode/Gmane, by the way) saying something like:
>
> > The discussion thread to provide feedback for this change
proposal can be
> > found here https://yaddayadda.example.com/blablabla
>
> With this kind of wording, is it any wonder that people take
that as
> mandatory and discussion on the mailing list has almost entirely
drowned
> out? (The only Change that gets any discussion here seems to be
the Plasma 6
> one, and only because it contains a completely outrageous
downstream-only
> change hidden in the fine print, silently killing Plasma X11
support.)

No, per Matt's reply, you were right and I was wrong, the intent is to
direct discussion to Discourse. I was confused because I was just
following the process documentation (silly me!) which doesn't explain
any of this.


The changes to  how discussions were to go to discourse happened 
around the same time as Ben was laid off. I think the documentation 
not getting updated is just one of ... many things left undone.





Apart from documentation, where this was announced? On Discourse? 
Because I don't remember any email about this change.



Vít



OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: The new Change discussion process is painful

[Vít Ondruch]

If I was subscribed to some categories without doing anything, e.g. 
"Package Reviews Swaps" (why I cannot copy the string from UI , this 
is precisely the annoyance with web applications), why I have not been 
subscribed to "Change proposals"?



Vít


Dne 13. 09. 23 v 19:40 Matthew Miller napsal(a):

On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 09:08:57AM +0200, Remi Collet wrote:

Sadly it seems there is some email issues

For a few days, tons of messages are lost
so, I also don't receive any of the recent change announcements

BTW, I agree this dual channel is terrible for discussion

I personally don't follow discussion.fpo
too much tools kills simplicity

Everything is a balance.

Even if you don't want to follow Fedora Discussion in general, to follow
changes, you can go subscribe to just those by email.

1. Sign in you with your Fedora account

2. Complete creating a Discussion account if you haven't already

3. Go to https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/my/preferences/tracking

4. Remove everything from all of the Categores and Teams & Tags dropdowns
that you don't want. (A few things are populated as defaults.)

5. Under Categories, add "Change Proposals" to either Watched (which will
send a notification for every post) or Watching First Post (which does
what it says).

6. Go to https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/my/preferences/emails

7. Change "Send me email when I have a notification" to "always", if it
isn't already.

8. Optional: notification messages will set a List-Id corresponding to the
Change Proposals category. You can set up your mail filters to do what
you like with those.

9. To interact, you can either come to the Discussion web interface, or
just reply to the email notifications.



OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[rpms/perl-Date-Calc] PR #1: Package tests; Modernize spec

[Jitka Plesnikova]

jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Date-Calc` that 
you are following:
``
Package tests; Modernize spec
``

To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Date-Calc/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: F40 Change Proposal: KDE Plasma 6 (System Wide)

[Michael J Gruber]

Am Mi., 13. Sept. 2023 um 23:29 Uhr schrieb Neal Gompa :
>
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 5:24 PM Fabio Valentini  wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 11:19 PM Steven A. Falco  
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > A question about this - the removal of X11 is listed on a change proposal 
> > > for KDE.  Does the removal just apply to KDE or would it be distribution 
> > > wide; i.e. affecting all desktops?
> >
> > I assume the following is not meant literally:
> >
> > """
> > For Fedora Linux, the
> > transition to KDE Plasma 6 will also include dropping support for the
> > X11 session entirely, leaving only Plasma Wayland as the sole offered
> > desktop mode.
> > """
> >
> > I doubt that the intention is to drop X11 sessions entirely and make
> > "Plasma Wayland" the only session available on Fedora *in general*,
> > but rather that the "Plasma X11" session will be dropped, and that
> > "Plasma Wayland" will be the only *Plasma* session available.
> >
>
> Yes! Sorry if it's ambiguous, it's hard to write this to account for
> all the ways it can be interpreted. This is scoped to the KDE Plasma
> solution stack.

The proposal is clearly about KDE plasma and *its* sessions. Or else
"leaving only Plasma Wayland as the sole offered desktop mode" would
have to mean the end of all other desktops on Fedora ;-)

> Other desktops can and will make their own choices on the transition to 
> Wayland.

Rightly so. Fewer and fewer will pull in X11, and that's a good change.

Now, if you (as in "they" - not  you Neal, obviously) see "change" and
something Wayland has not worked in the past and you go ballistic
about it then for you (as in "they") that formulation might be
ambiguous. But if you take a breath or a step back or both then the
proposal is crystal clear. At the same time, there is no way around it
given upstream's directions.

Talking of upstream: I see some upstreams giving up on Wayland
support. Kicad was reported here, Scribus is another one. It's a
surprising time to do that, but probably indicates toolkit issues or
simply lack of people power. I hope we can help at least on the
toolkit side. That would be time well spent - invested in the future
of the platform. Nobody will stop anyone from shipping a plasma-x11
package (and it's ridiculous to try and read that into the proposal)
or even a full stack plasma 5, but that will just drag out the
transition that is happening nonetheless.

Full disclosure: Writing this from F38/X11/i3 ;-)
F39 should be a good release to try the switch (Wayland/sway for me),
and in fact for some releases we have had dual session options now at
least for Gnome and KDE (X11/Wayland) so that one could try and switch
apps gradually. Reliance on WebRTC (and the switches i3/sway, st/foot
etc) made me chicken out so far, but now is the time!

Michael
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Fedora Linux 38 Beta Go/No-Go meeting today (2023-09-14)

[Adam Williamson]

The Fedora Linux 39 Beta Go/No-Go[1] meeting is scheduled for Thursday
14 September at 1700 UTC in #fedora-meeting on libera.chat[2]. At this
time, we will determine the status of the F39 Beta for the 19 September
target date #1[3]. For more information about the Go/No-Go meeting, see
the wiki[4].

Please note the IRC<->Matrix bridge is down at present, so you must
join IRC to attend the meeting, using a native client or the webchat
link below.

[1] https://calendar.fedoraproject.org/meeting/10583/
[2] https://web.libera.chat/#fedora-meeting
[3] https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-39/f-39-key-tasks.html
[4] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Go_No_Go_Meeting
-- 
Adam Williamson (he/him/his)
Fedora QA
Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @ad...@fosstodon.org
https://www.happyassassin.net
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: PDC replacement proposal

[Adam Williamson]

On Thu, 2023-09-14 at 07:41 +0200, Tomas Hrcka wrote:
> Ok, now we are on the same page.
> 
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 8:04 PM Adam Williamson 
> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 2023-09-13 at 16:49 +0200, Tomas Hrcka wrote:
> > > I thought this was exactly the JSON blob we will implement, If you look
> > at
> > > the model of PDC
> > > 
> > https://product-definition-center.github.io/product-definition-center/_images/overview.svg
> > > 
> > > Those endpoints are covered by relations Release, Compose, RPM through
> > some
> > > others.
> > > The PDC approach is more or less a normalized RDBMS model.
> > > This should be replaceable by a much simpler denormalized approach and
> > > create one entry for each compose with all the data in one place.
> > 
> > That's missing the 'composes' endpoint use (#1 in my list below). Not
> > sure if that's your fault or mine, sorry if I left it out of a previous
> > list.
> > 
> > Does your replacement plan cover the "previous_release" use case, where
> > we need a list of all the composes for each release in the order they
> > happened?
> > 
> > 
> Yes idea was to have the compose_id as a document root since it is unique
> for each compose.
> something like this:
> 
> Fedora-Rawhide-20230913.n.0:{
> compose_related_metadata:[metadata0:metadata,metadata1:metadata]
> rpms:[nvr:other_rdata,nvr1:other_rdata1]
> images:{Fedora-Sway-Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20230913.n.0.iso:"some metadata"}
> }

Sure, that works. These dicts should just be straight dumps of the
metadata files from the composes - composeinfo.json, rpms.json and
images.json - e.g. the ones at
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/rawhide/Fedora-Rawhide-20230913.n.0/compose/metadata/
. I'm pretty sure that's what they are in PDC already.

Note, I still don't think this covers my case #1 exactly: well, it
would probably make cid_to_label possible, but as described, I'm not
sure it would make label_to_cid possible. We can query PDC with a
release number and a label - a label is something like Beta-1.1 - and
it will return a single compose, from which we can read the compose ID.
If the proposal is essentially just a JSON dict whose keys are compose
IDs...well, I suppose technically we could grab the whole thing and do
some operations on it to find the compose with a given label, but it's
a bit more awkward than just querying. And if it's just a flat dict of
every compose ever, presumably it'll be paged, and finding the one you
want might take a while?
-- 
Adam Williamson (he/him/his)
Fedora QA
Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @ad...@fosstodon.org
https://www.happyassassin.net



___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue