On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 11:32 PM Maxwell G wrote:
>
> Hi Fedorians,
>
> I'm back with more ansible license updates. Upstream, some of the community
> Ansible Collections have adopted the REUSE specification, which makes it much
> easier to determine the overall license. For collections that have adopted
> this, the license texts are all stored as files in one directory, instead of
> being spread out throughout the source tree as file headers. I would like to
> thank the upstream developers for working with me on this.
>
> The License tag of ansible-collection-community-general has changed from
> "GPLv3+ and BSD and Python" to "GPL-3.0-or-later AND BSD-2-Clause AND PSF-2.0
> AND MIT". See
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ansible-collection-community-general/pull-request/8.
>
> The License tag of ansible has changed from "GPLv3+" to "GPL-3.0-or-later AND
> Apache-2.0 AND BSD-2-Clause AND BSD-3-Clause AND MIT AND MPL-2.0 AND PSF-2.0".
> I cannot claim this to be 100% accurate, but I have done my best to determine
> the overall license. Note that ansible is a curated bundle of 103 Ansible
> collections, so this task is a bit difficult. See
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ansible/pull-request/32.
Thank you! We are not aiming for 100% accuracy (as that is impossible
outside of the simplest [from a licensing standpoint] packages) but
for greater accuracy than was possible or expected under earlier
approaches. This is very helpful.
Richard
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
