Re: Fedora 18 : broken configuration for httpd 2.4
Le 01/11/2012 18:25, Jason L Tibbitts III a écrit : It would have been super nice to actually include a link in all of those bugs, or some reference. I mean, they must have been filed by program, so it's not as if you would have had to do a bunch of extra typing. We really need a mass bug filing howto or something. Preferably starting with Don't. Have you notice than all this bugs depend on #871373 which provides some useful information ? Remi. - J -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Fedora 18 : broken configuration for httpd 2.4
Le 01/11/2012 18:25, Jason L Tibbitts III a écrit : It would have been super nice to actually include a link in all of those bugs, or some reference. I mean, they must have been filed by program, so it's not as if you would have had to do a bunch of extra typing. No, nothing automatic here. I have analyzed all the /etc/httpd/config.d/*conf from the spec file, the RPM sources or the upstream sources. When I detect possible breakage I have open a bug manually. Remember, this issue was raised in March/April... [1] Yes probably, I could have do it in a better way... (and probably earlier) We really need a mass bug filing howto or something. Preferably starting with Don't. You're right, I should have avoid this mass bug filing. But sorry, I just try to make Fedora better, and I think that ~60 broken web apps is not good for our image. Ok, next time, I will think twice before doing this, and prefer use my time on my packages, and only mine. Remi. [1] http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-March/165058.html -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Fedora 18 : broken configuration for httpd 2.4
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 8:14 PM, Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 30/10/2012 15:14, Remi Collet a écrit : So I open a tracker bug for this issues https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871373 Finally : 60 open bugs. Thanks for the bugs. Kushal -- http://fedoraproject.org http://kushaldas.in -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Fedora 18 : broken configuration for httpd 2.4
On 11/01/2012 05:25 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: It would have been super nice to actually include a link in all of those bugs, or some reference. I mean, they must have been filed by program, so it's not as if you would have had to do a bunch of extra typing. Most of us do this actually manually. We really need a mass bug filing howto or something. Preferably starting with Don't. The proper way to do this is exactly what Remi did as in create a tracker bug then have all the relevant bugs block that tracker bug and you just monitor that tracker bug. The above is the standard practice within the community... JBG -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Fedora 18 : broken configuration for httpd 2.4
On 11/01/2012 06:25 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: It would have been super nice to actually include a link in all of those bugs, or some reference. I mean, they must have been filed by program, so it's not as if you would have had to do a bunch of extra typing. We really need a mass bug filing howto or something. Preferably starting with Don't. - J Bugs could contain little more info, but I hope our maintainer are aware of existence of dependent/blocking bugs. Remi did wonderful job. We can track changes better than with mailing list and replies fixed. Marcela -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Fedora 18 : broken configuration for httpd 2.4
RC == Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com writes: RC Have you notice than all this bugs depend on #871373 which provides RC some useful information ? The useful information was not in the ticket. Which means it wasn't in the email. Which means I had to get over to a web browser, wait for bugzilla to load, and click around (and wait some more) to figure out what on earth was going on. People seem to think this is a great thing, and yes, I applaud Remi for trying to help, but mass-filing tickets is the last resort, to be used after doing a proper announcement and having discussion. nirik are working on a proposal for some policy here. - J -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Fedora 18 : broken configuration for httpd 2.4
Le 31/10/2012 22:25, Gianluca Sforna a écrit : So, befoer I dig into manuals, can you name the most common causes for breakage? Some explanation on the tracker bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871373 Remi. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Fedora 18 : broken configuration for httpd 2.4
It would have been super nice to actually include a link in all of those bugs, or some reference. I mean, they must have been filed by program, so it's not as if you would have had to do a bunch of extra typing. We really need a mass bug filing howto or something. Preferably starting with Don't. - J -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Fedora 18 : broken configuration for httpd 2.4
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com wrote: I you need more explanation on the required changes, feel free to ask. So, befoer I dig into manuals, can you name the most common causes for breakage? -- Gianluca Sforna http://morefedora.blogspot.com http://identi.ca/giallu - http://twitter.com/giallu -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Fedora 18 : broken configuration for httpd 2.4
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 30/10/2012 15:14, Remi Collet a écrit : So I open a tracker bug for this issues https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871373 Finally : 60 open bugs. Note : if your package provides an Apache configuration file and is not listed here, I could have miss it, so please review it. Some package only provides a minimal configuration with Alias /foo /usr/share/foo I haven't open a bug, even if I think this configuration is broken, but this is not related to httpd 2.4 (by default / access is denied) Remi. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlCP59oACgkQYUppBSnxahg5ZgCg1Fci1N8ntnSIHFlPyE3q71vu oawAoNFzN03mDHFGEHOs7iYCzr5dWnvG =GOIw -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Fedora 18 : broken configuration for httpd 2.4
On 10/30/2012 02:44 PM, Remi Collet wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 30/10/2012 15:14, Remi Collet a écrit : So I open a tracker bug for this issues https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871373 Finally : 60 open bugs. Note : if your package provides an Apache configuration file and is not listed here, I could have miss it, so please review it. Some package only provides a minimal configuration with Alias /foo /usr/share/foo I haven't open a bug, even if I think this configuration is broken, but this is not related to httpd 2.4 (by default / access is denied) Excellent work thanks JGB -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
