Re: [DDN] ICANN, the linguistic digital divide IDN

2006-08-01 Thread Cindy Lemcke-Hoong
Hello Don,

Thank you VERY MUCH for bringing this article to DDN. 

I have been argueing about language divide is more damaging than digital 
divide,  for the past 5 years or more, at many online forums. Most time my 
arguement seems to fall on deaf ears since the audiences are mostly English 
speakers only. With this article, I feel that finally my little voice is being 
heard by a much wider audience. And professionally. 

Setting up their own domain names (China, S. Korea, Japan, Israel etc.) is not 
really a smart move. These countries are building their own digital getto. The 
world should not be happy either to think it is OK if these countries build 
their own getto. Think Knowledge Sharing! 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Don Osborn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The recent news that the US government 
has in principle ceded control of ICANN 
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/07/27/ntia_icann_meeting/ is related to an 
issue that seems to get less coverage - that of Internationalized Domain Names 
(IDN) and the interest behind that in a more multilingual internet. Language of 
course is one of the factors of the digital divide and it has been 
particularly problematic in the case of diverse scripts (and, although it is 
often overlooked in discussing writing systems and ICT, even Latin scripts with 
extra letters and diacritics beyond ASCII  ANSI). The Guardian has an 
interesting article exploring this issue in the context of internet governance 
at http://technology.guardian.co.uk/weekly/story/0,,1830481,00.html (excerpts 
below).

I've tended to see IDN as a subset of the larger issues of content, but in a 
way, resloving the technical issues involved in multilingual domain names 
contributes not only to making the web more welcoming to more people and 
peoples, but also to facilitating the processing of more localized content in 
languages that are not yet well represented on the web. Sort of a wedge issue, 
in other words, for the multilingual internet.

Hopefully the new developments with regard to ICANN will help in this process. 

Don Osborn
Bisharat.net
PanAfrican Localisation Project


Despite everything you may have heard, the global resource we all know as the 
internet is not global at all. Since you are reading this article in English 
you probably won't have noticed, but if your first language was Chinese, 
Arabic, Hindi or Tamil, you would know very different. At most websites you 
visit you will be scrabbling to find a link to a translated version in your 
language, seemingly hidden amid tracts of baffling text. Even getting to a 
website in the first place requires that you master the western alphabet - have 
you ever tried to type .com in Chinese letters?
. . . 
Icann was first approached in the year it was created - 1998 - with the aim of 
introducing internationalised domain names into its system. But it has yet to 
introduce a single one. Many members of the global internet community have 
cried foul at the endless delays from a company based in the least 
linguistically diverse area of the world (the US has speakers of 170 different 
languages, compared to 364 in Europe and 2,390 in Africa). 

The Guardian, 27 July 2006, Divided by a Common Language
http://technology.guardian.co.uk/weekly/story/0,,1830481,00.html
___
DIGITALDIVIDE mailing list
DIGITALDIVIDE@mailman.edc.org
http://mailman.edc.org/mailman/listinfo/digitaldivide
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE 
in the body of the message.



=

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
DIGITALDIVIDE mailing list
DIGITALDIVIDE@mailman.edc.org
http://mailman.edc.org/mailman/listinfo/digitaldivide
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE 
in the body of the message.


Re: [DDN] $100 laptop includes WiFi

2006-04-08 Thread Cindy Lemcke-Hoong
Well, the reason I thought it is interesting for the group is, as you have 
mentioned (we discussed till death) the interests then were so much on the 100$ 
LapTop and nothing (seems) much on the network etc. 

Now we even see the team that supports MIT has ' volunteered' to support this 
project. So the team is growing, assuming budget becomes elastic ... perhaps it 
is nothing new?? OR

Perhaps food for thoughts for anyone who is interested in starting any project? 
Or support the idea of another one of this high-flyer projects? Let's just 
assume my intention is making sure most of us do not forget about this white 
elephant?

Cindy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Dave A. Chakrabarti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The ability to mesh network 
was included in this laptop's specs from the 
beginning, if I remember correctly. We've discussed this topic to 
death...I really don't see anything very new in Negropointe's work so 
far. I'll be more inclined to think well of the project if it's 
implemented in a suitable fashion...with decent levels of support 
(hardware, software, and networking), wireless internet infrastructure, 
internet backhaul equipment and upstream bandwidth procurement at 
affordable costs (and paid by whom?), initiatives to train and support 
teachers and content creators in developing nations, etc. Otherwise, I 
don't really see the point. Haven't generations of experiences proven 
that throwing technology at a problem accomplishes nothing? This project 
seems to allocate an undue amount of funding towards technology, with 
little or no thought for all of the other factors that create a 
successful community technology movement.

  Dave.

---
Dave A. Chakrabarti
Projects Coordinator
CTCNet Chicago
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(708) 919 1026
---




Cindy Lemcke-Hoong wrote:
 Here is an followed-up article on the $100 laptop for every child. I found it 
 on the  OpenSpectrum.info website. 
 
 http://www.volweb.cz/horvitz/os-info/news-feb06-017.html
 
 The interesting part of the news, for me, is the addition of WiFi, and this 
 sentence below.
 
 
Some of Negroponte's MIT associates are also following him to his OLPC 
non-profit to assist, which speaks even more highly of this highly-regarded 
initiative.
 
 
 Cindy
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 
 
 
 =
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ___
 DIGITALDIVIDE mailing list
 DIGITALDIVIDE@mailman.edc.org
 http://mailman.edc.org/mailman/listinfo/digitaldivide
 To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE 
 in the body of the message.
 
___
DIGITALDIVIDE mailing list
DIGITALDIVIDE@mailman.edc.org
http://mailman.edc.org/mailman/listinfo/digitaldivide
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE 
in the body of the message.



=

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
DIGITALDIVIDE mailing list
DIGITALDIVIDE@mailman.edc.org
http://mailman.edc.org/mailman/listinfo/digitaldivide
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE 
in the body of the message.


Re: [DDN] $100 laptop includes WiFi

2006-04-08 Thread Cindy Lemcke-Hoong
Hello Taran,

That is what makes this whole thing so interesting for me. Normally we would 
talk about the infrastructure first ... I am just being sarcastic of course. 

As I recalled countries such as Brazil, China and Nigeria (I could be wrong 
about the name of the countries) already put in order for 100millions laptop. 
Delivery time as I understand is sometime before the end of this year. Perhaps 
the chicken would come before the eggs? 

Taran Rampersad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's all a very good idea if there 
is an infrastructure for the wireless 
to connect to. The money for those laptops could be spent on 
infrastructure so that there is actually something to connect to, 
instead of something that will be outdated in one evolution of Moore's 
Law... 18 months.

Cindy Lemcke-Hoong wrote:
 Here is an followed-up article on the $100 laptop for every child. I found it 
 on the  OpenSpectrum.info website. 

 http://www.volweb.cz/horvitz/os-info/news-feb06-017.html

 The interesting part of the news, for me, is the addition of WiFi, and this 
 sentence below.

   
 Some of Negroponte's MIT associates are also following him to his OLPC 
 non-profit to assist, which speaks even more highly of this 
 highly-regarded 
 initiative.
 

 Cindy
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]






 =

 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ___
 DIGITALDIVIDE mailing list
 DIGITALDIVIDE@mailman.edc.org
 http://mailman.edc.org/mailman/listinfo/digitaldivide
 To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE 
 in the body of the message.



   


-- 
Taran Rampersad
Presently in: San Fernando, Trinidad and Tobago
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Looking for contracts/work!
http://www.knowprose.com/node/9786

New!: http://www.OpenDepth.com
http://www.knowprose.com
http://www.digitaldivide.net/profile/Taran

Pictures: http://www.flickr.com/photos/knowprose/

Criticize by creating. — Michelangelo

___
DIGITALDIVIDE mailing list
DIGITALDIVIDE@mailman.edc.org
http://mailman.edc.org/mailman/listinfo/digitaldivide
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE 
in the body of the message.



=

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
DIGITALDIVIDE mailing list
DIGITALDIVIDE@mailman.edc.org
http://mailman.edc.org/mailman/listinfo/digitaldivide
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE 
in the body of the message.


Re: [DDN] bogus new york times article

2006-04-02 Thread Cindy Lemcke-Hoong
Hello Andy, 

How about you write one for New York Time as a guest writer? Perhaps then the 
public would get a better picture of digital divide?

Cindy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Andy Carvin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Phil,

My blog post earlier today is a response to some of the issues raised in 
the article. I was surprised by the tone myself; when I talked to the 
author about a month ago, I got the impression he'd be writing it 
somewhat differently.

http://www.andycarvin.com/archives/2006/03/race_and_the_digital.html



=

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
DIGITALDIVIDE mailing list
DIGITALDIVIDE@mailman.edc.org
http://mailman.edc.org/mailman/listinfo/digitaldivide
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE 
in the body of the message.


Re: [DDN] my digital divide article in School Library Journal

2006-03-18 Thread Cindy Lemcke-Hoong
Hello Andy,

We have to keep politicians and others on their toes
on this topic. 

Here is an article written by Ulises A. Mejias I would
like to share with the group. Ulises is an Ed.D
student at Teachers College, Colombia University. He
also teaches a graduate course on Social software. Do
take your time and browse through his website. You
might find many articles that are thought provoking
just like I did and still do. 

In Defense of the Digital Divide as Paralogy (v 1.0)

by Ulises A. Mejias
Introduction: Why Won't Lyotard Go Away?

http://ideant.typepad.com/ideant/2006/02/in_defense_of_t.html#comments

[EMAIL PROTECTED]


 Here's a link to the full text of the article in
 case you're interested 
 in reading it:
 

http://www.schoollibraryjournal.com/article/CA6312460.html
 
 -andy


=

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
DIGITALDIVIDE mailing list
DIGITALDIVIDE@mailman.edc.org
http://mailman.edc.org/mailman/listinfo/digitaldivide
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE 
in the body of the message.


[DDN] Change from --- $159 Linspire computer --- to mobile computing

2006-03-16 Thread Cindy Lemcke-Hoong
Hello Taran,

Mobile computing. 

You raised some interesting issues that I am no longer
that familiar. 

One of my confusion with mobile computing is that I
see two situations: 1) using the mobile phone as a
computer, 2) using the mobile network for computer.
Item 1 is the situation that I ruled out for myself
(eye sights and big fingers) but can item 2 works?
Technically speaking can one uses the mobile network
for computer? I think the standards are different. Am
I right? 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]


=

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
DIGITALDIVIDE mailing list
DIGITALDIVIDE@mailman.edc.org
http://mailman.edc.org/mailman/listinfo/digitaldivide
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE 
in the body of the message.


Re: [DDN] Looking for resources in Cantonese

2006-02-24 Thread Cindy Lemcke-Hoong
Hello Stephen,

As far as I know, when it comes to written form, we
all use Mandarin/Chinese. Although there is such thing
as 'written Cantonese' but there are only very few
characters that are peculiar to Cantonese speakers.
And to a certain extent the sentence constructions can
be slightly different from Mandarin. Or other Chinese
dialtects.

Therefore basically it dosen't matter if one is
speaking Cantonese, Mandarin or Shanghainese, for
example, the 'written form' are the same. Only the way
we pronouce the words are different. And if you think
it is crazy among the Chinese, actually you can show
the Chinese characters to the Korean or Japanese, they
would understand what they mean but again will prounce
in their own tongue (that is if the Japanese and
Korean you encoutered do know how to read Chinese or
Kanji). 

Sorry for the long explaination. But perhaps what you
are looking for is Mandarin/Chinese materials? 

Cindy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



=

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
DIGITALDIVIDE mailing list
DIGITALDIVIDE@mailman.edc.org
http://mailman.edc.org/mailman/listinfo/digitaldivide
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE 
in the body of the message.


Re: [DDN] [Multilingualism in Cyberspace] Perhaps more complex than that

2006-02-12 Thread Cindy Lemcke-Hoong
Hello Dave,

You post is VERY long indeed. I will try to have a
short post, and perhaps later if there are more
comments from others. 

Perhaps you might want to think why you have English
as your first langauge now, and so am I. We both grew
up in countries that once belong to the British
Empire. In a way, if I am correct so is Cananda,
Australia, NZ and many countries in the African
continent etc. etc. etc. (as I am not too sure about
the US, so I will let someone tell me ...I know for
sure historically, you escape having to learn Dutch as
first language!! So what if you speak English, come to
Holland and I will assure you you can surve quite well
with English, but you would be quite lost and many
other things. Like me). 

So, what shall we do with people that was once the
colonies of Spaiin, Portugal, France, Belgium, the
Netheralnds to name a few? OR those that were too
uninteresting to be a colony for any one of the OLD
countries? According to your theory, does that mean
ALMOST all of South American should drop their own
langauge and learn English instead? Or the Chinese
with 1.6 billiongs citizen should ignore their own
language? What about Indonesia combined with Malaysia?
or the German which has more millions of inhabitans
than NL (only 16 millions therefore anyone can bully
them into dropping their own langauge and stick to
English). How about the French? They too have many
former colonies in the African continent, Vietnam,
Haiti, even a tiny portion of Cananda??? I don't think
the French or the German are going to agree with you.
German is spoken in more than just Germany. Now I just
remember, Italy is another big country! And Portugal
would join hand with Brazil, and Macao (tiny but ..)

India is a unique case, perhaps, because Indians NEVER
agreed to have one of their own language to represent
thier country, instead they are using English as their
official languae. You cannot say that about China.
China has united their language to Mandarin since, I
don't know, many centuries ago. Therefore, is it right
to ask them to drop their own official/native
language? 

Take the case of Indonesia, the country has a very
lopsided rich vs. poor. Therefore the rich would not
have problem with using English as defacto IT language
since most of them would have had the chance of
studying in the US, Australia, Canada etc. They have
money. AND if they cannot speak the langauge, they can
always hire someone to translate for them. I don't
really know the percentage of rich vs. poor in that
country. But I am quite sure it is something around
the region of 10% vs 90% poor. So, what are we going
to do with the poor? Ask all of them to learn another
language? Forget about if it technically doable, is it
ethically correct? After all we are talking about
solving digital divide to leap-frog the poor. Why then
the burden should be on the poor? 

OK. I am going to stop here. I will see if anyone
would  send in their arguement about the economic side
etc. etc. 

Do not forget as well, Indonesia is one of the
countries that are going to order 100 millions of the
100$ lap-top. 

Cindy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


=

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
DIGITALDIVIDE mailing list
DIGITALDIVIDE@mailman.edc.org
http://mailman.edc.org/mailman/listinfo/digitaldivide
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE 
in the body of the message.


Re: [DDN] Multilingualism in Cyberspace

2006-02-07 Thread Cindy Lemcke-Hoong
Hello Nazrul,

Language is a real issue especially since WSIS the
promotion of the 100USD lap-top. 

I have always questioned the notion of English as the
defacto internet language. For countries/people who
are not knowledgeable in this langauge, with the
digital content mostly in English, that would mean the
burden is AGAIN on those poorer/digital hungry
countries/people. So how good it is to give them a
lap-top while they cannot read what is there?  

I have spoke out about language divide for the past
3,4  years. But, small voice generates no punch. After
all people who is on this list precisely because they
know English, if not English is their native language.
They don't feel the pain of those who are locked out
because they lack the language ability. 

Cindy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


=

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
DIGITALDIVIDE mailing list
DIGITALDIVIDE@mailman.edc.org
http://mailman.edc.org/mailman/listinfo/digitaldivide
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE 
in the body of the message.


RE: [DDN] More info on the MIT/Quanta laptop partnership

2005-12-15 Thread Cindy Lemcke-Hoong
  
 With dedication to technological innovation and education, Chairman 
 Barry Lam launched a new US $200 million RD center, Quanta RD Complex 
 (QRDC), in Taiwan. The facility, which opened in Q3 of 2005, has 2.2 million 
 square feet of floor space, and the capacity to house up to 7,000 engineers.
  So employment goes to WHAT world? Developed, developing or to be developed? 
  
  WSIS announcement of the One Computer per child was on November 18 (am  I 
right?). Today is 14 December. And with less than 30 days ... the Cambridge, 
Massachusetts-The One Laptop per Child NGO  is able to send out invitations, 
accept bids, evaluates, and completed  selection of the vendor.  All done in 
less than 30 days!! 
  
  How astonishingly SPEEDY!! 
  
  Would anyone spend 200 million USD on a RD facility without  knowing before 
hand he is going to win a contract to manufacture  millions of lap-top that 
cost 100 USD each? 
  
  What a great way of job creations for the rich developed worlds. IF the  
intention of UN and others is to help developing world, why not India? 
  
  Cindy
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
Executive Director [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:  Quanta has a good name in white 
book and OEM notebooks and I am sending this
from one I built myself.

Mike

Michael F. Pitsch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Carvin
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 1:54 PM
To: The Digital Divide Network discussion group
Subject: [DDN] More info on the MIT/Quanta laptop partnership

Here's the official press release from Negroponte's One Laptop Per Child
initiative regarding the manufacturing partnership with Taiwan's Quanta. 
-andy

Quanta Computer Inc. to Manufacture $100 Laptop

December 13, 2005-Cambridge, Massachusetts-The One Laptop per Child
(OLPC) board of directors today announced that Quanta Computer Inc. of
Taiwan was chosen as the original design manufacturer (ODM) for the $100
laptop project. The decision was made after the board reviewed bids from
several possible manufacturing companies.

In announcing the selection of Quanta, OLPC Chairman Nicholas Negroponte
said, Any previous doubt that a very-low-cost laptop could be made for
education in the developing world has just gone away. Quanta has agreed to
devote significant engineering resources from the Quanta Research Institute
(QRI) in Q1 and Q2, 2006, with a target of bringing the product to market in
Q4. The launch of 5-15 million units will be both in large-scale pilot
projects in seven culturally diverse countries (China, India, Brazil,
Argentina, Egypt, Nigeria, and Thailand), with one million units in each of
these countries, and an additional modest allocation of machines to seed
developer communities in a number of other selected countries. A commercial
version of the machine will be explored in parallel.

Quanta would like to contribute its industry-leading laptop technologies to
the future success of the project, in hope of affording children worldwide
with opportunities not only to close the 'digital divide,' but also to
bridge the 'knowledge divide.' This project signifies a new stage and scale
for the laptop industry by including those children never before considered
to be laptop users, said Quanta founder and chairman, Barry Lam.

One Laptop per Child (OLPC) is a Delaware-based, non-profit organization
created by Nicholas Negroponte and other faculty members from the MIT Media
Lab to design, manufacture, and distribute laptops that are sufficiently
inexpensive to provide every child in the world access to knowledge and
modern forms of education. The laptops will be sold to governments and
issued to children by schools on a basis of one laptop per child. These
machines will be rugged, Linux-based, and so energy efficient that
hand-cranking alone can generate sufficient power for operation. Mesh
networking will give many machines Internet access from one connection. The
pricing goal will start near $100 and then steadily decrease. The corporate
members are Advanced Micro Devices (AMD), Brightstar, Google, News
Corporation, Nortel, and Red Hat.

Quanta Computer Inc. was founded in 1988 in Taiwan. With over US $10 billion
in sales, the company is a leading provider of technology products and
solutions to Fortune 500 companies, including Dell, HP, and IBM. Quanta has
the distinction of being the world's largest manufacturer of laptop PCs. The
company also provides a full array of mobile phones, LCD TVs, and servers
and storage products.

With dedication to technological innovation and education, Chairman Barry
Lam launched a new US $200 million RD center, Quanta RD Complex (QRDC), in
Taiwan. The facility, which opened in Q3 of 2005, has 2.2 million square
feet of floor space, and the capacity to house up to 7,000 engineers.

For more information about Quanta, visit http://www.quantatw.com

To learn about the $100 Laptop, visit http://laptop.media.mit.edu

--

RE: [DDN] Intel: Poor Want 'Real' Computers (fwd)

2005-12-13 Thread Cindy Lemcke-Hoong
Hello Paul,
  
  What you have described is what I have been saying. Perhaps not as directly 
and as powerful as you just did. 
  
  Someone wrote about innovation. And that set me thinking this  afternoon. 
Innovation -- big or small, any shapes and sizes, any  flavours -- will only 
materialize at the right time, right place, right  people, right maturity, 
right knowledge etc. We cannot force or   innovate UNLESS all the ingredients 
are present.  
  
  We were born different and shape by different environments. Looking at  
myself, even though I think I am technically quite sound, I only dare  to claim 
as a decent ICT user. I am quite hopeless in many things. I  was not willing to 
own a PC until just a few months before I was  laid-off. Reason is very simple, 
I was afraid (still am) of supporting  myself with a PC. 
  
  THEREFORE, the people that WE so decided to give them computer lessons,  give 
them free computers ... are they ready to receive the knowledge  that WE THINK 
they should have?? I have an elderly friend actually is  afraid of the mouse 
because he has problem to control the movement and  yet this same person bought 
the first kind of PC that came to the  market in 1982 (??). He is a mechanical 
engineer, mathematician and  accountant. If we give him an ICT skills test he 
would qualify without  any problem. YET ... 
  
  We can encourage people to want knowledge, but we cannot force them. We  
spent so much time argueing about technologies. I am sure many would  agree 
with me, technology is not the problem. People is. And I mean  both the supply  
and demand kinds of 'people'. Just simple  marketing logic. If you want to sell 
 your ideas/products, you  need to know your consumers. Do we? Do we take time 
to understand why  they 'run' away? Do we take time to understand their FEARS? 
their  frustrations? their 'real wants'? 
  
  One of the major problem is, we tend to simplify things and provide a  
ONE-size-fit-all solution. We think what works in Latin America will  work in 
Asia. ... 
  
  Just some of my thoughts. 
  
  Cindy
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  

Paul Mondesire [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Yet  when investment arrives and when 
agencies offer FREE training on FREE  computers these same people disappear 
into the mist because they have  no excuse left, or realize that their bluff 
has been called and the  reality is that they never really WANTED to use the 
facility, but it  was something to bang a drum over!
   
  The truth of this statement is really profound. I was involved in a  program 
a few years ago and there were brand new i-Macs with free  Internet access 
available for families with a 6-hour course (over 2  weekends with lunch) as 
the only prerequisite. Only 20% of the machines  went out in the first 6 
months. This was sad and frustrating for many  of us but we came to understand 
that the computer meant nothing to them  as they could not perceive the value 
of the technology in their lives.  Their children's MAYBE, not not their own. 
The fact is there has to be  a practical use for a given technology otherwise 
it is a handy but  bulky door stop for too many folks. 
   
 There are those who  identify so closely with the culture of victimhood that 
they will not  take steps to help themselves no matter how the support is 
offered or  who seeks to share it. The up side of this is there is ALWAYS 
someone  willing to step up to the plate to accept that offer of assistance. A  
hand up, NOT a hand out!.
   
  Paul Mondesire
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
   
___
DIGITALDIVIDE mailing list
DIGITALDIVIDE@mailman.edc.org
http://mailman.edc.org/mailman/listinfo/digitaldivide
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE 
in the body of the message.




=

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
DIGITALDIVIDE mailing list
DIGITALDIVIDE@mailman.edc.org
http://mailman.edc.org/mailman/listinfo/digitaldivide
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE 
in the body of the message.


RE: [DDN] Fwd: [GKD] Microsoft Donations: Roses with Thorns?

2005-12-09 Thread Cindy Lemcke-Hoong
Moral of the story: 
  
  Is there any difference between Microsoft vs the famous 100$ lap-top? 
  
  One should ask the same question on that 100 million lap-top order: who  gets 
to manufacture them? who gets pay at the MIT lab, where are the  researchers 
and technical experts located?? Who's citizen actually  benefit from all these? 
  
  There are more stories of 'strings' . But if I do list them, I am sure  
someone would tell me they do not belong to this discussions ... 
  
  Cindy
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Michael Maranda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:  That is an unfortunate story.  But 
it raises a general question of how we
relate to technology and to funders and donors who are in our sector.  We
want resources to do what we think is needed in our commnities or in policy
work related to technology.  We need the courage to accept resources that
fit our colleective values.  Even if a particular gift comes to one of us
without such strings attached, what does it say when we accept resources
from entities that practice their philanthropy in this manner?



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kris Dev
Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 10:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [DDN] Fwd: [GKD] Microsoft Donations: Roses with Thorns?


-- Forwarded message --
From: Augusta Molnar  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Dec 8, 2005 6:26 AM
Subject: [GKD] Microsoft Donations: Roses with Thorns?
To: gkd@milhouse.edc.org

Dear GKD Members,

I am writing from Oaxaca, Mexico where I am visiting communities in the
highlands. They have been beneficiaries of a very cool project financed in
part by the Gates foundation to install a wireless connection and a set of
computers for the schools. We are working on a network in the Latin America
region for communities for which we use by preference FireFox as our
browser. We suggested they try this browser as Explorer was causing
problems, and discovered to our surprise that the Gates foundation gift
comes with tags.

The computer network does not allow any of the users of the donated
computers to install any software not owned by Microsoft, even any open
source software. The network within which the computers reside will not
allow any individual computers to download software to install, ostensibly
to prevent viruses and incompatible software from jeopardizing the Microsoft
system.

These are computers installed for educational purposes in a number of
telecenters in the public libraries in Mexico for all the young students
preparing for a global world. These computers are therefore their only
affordable access to the Internet and to learning about computers and
programs. A significant number of them will leave this town to work at least
part of their life elsewhere in Mexico or in the U.S. Their work and career
opportunities will depend upon their skills and preparedness.

I am reminded of my youth, working in the vicinity of USAID programs which
only purchased American-made cars shipped to remote corners of Asia for
irrigation projects, etc., because the tied money only allowed US bids.
(Ever try to blow up a pneumatic truck tire with a bicycle pump in a small
town in Asia? )

Is this standard Gates foundation policies?? Is this type of tag
allowed??

Interested to hear from those of you who are more knowledgeable on this
point.


Augusta Molnar
Director, Community and Markets Program
Forest Trends
1050 Potomac Street NW
Washington, D.C. 20007
Phone: 202 298-3006
Fax: 202 298-3014
www.forest-trends.org





***GKD is solely supported by EDC, a Non-Profit Organization*** To post a
message, send it to:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe or unsubscribe, send a
message to: . In the 1st line of the message type:
subscribe gkd OR type: unsubscribe gkd Archives of previous GKD messages can
be found at: 
___
DIGITALDIVIDE mailing list
DIGITALDIVIDE@mailman.edc.org
http://mailman.edc.org/mailman/listinfo/digitaldivide
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word UNSUBSCRIBE in the body of the message.



___
DIGITALDIVIDE mailing list
DIGITALDIVIDE@mailman.edc.org
http://mailman.edc.org/mailman/listinfo/digitaldivide
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE 
in the body of the message.




=

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
DIGITALDIVIDE mailing list
DIGITALDIVIDE@mailman.edc.org
http://mailman.edc.org/mailman/listinfo/digitaldivide
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE 
in the body of the message.


Re: [DDN] What Size For Kids (formerly the $100 laptop debate)

2005-12-05 Thread Cindy Lemcke-Hoong
Hello Tom, Taran, Richard
  
  Everytime I wanted to stop posting ...

 If you mean lack of free content provision perhaps:
 http://www.gutenberg.or

Tom: Actually they were written by Taran... no matter. I 
will give one thought of my own now that you gave 2 
examples of where one can find contents... both English 
sites. 

Your suggest lead me to the thought of: 
are we all looking at this world is going to be on giant
MONOlingual (English) place? How about French, Hindi, 
Swahili, Korean, Mandarin, Bahasa Malaysia/Indonesia ... 
not to mention another 100 or so languages of this world !! 

... I better not start another arguement about 
bringing the burden of learning English (THE divide, by 
the way, created by the ICT world).. :-) ..

Taran, Richard, 
Re: Pushing technology ...

I have written before: as long as we are using first world 
solution solving 3rd world problems, we will never get out
of this mode. Give them the tools they need, not the tools 
WE THINK they should have. 

Stoop DOWN to their level... One can see better together
with them

Cindy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

  



=

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
DIGITALDIVIDE mailing list
DIGITALDIVIDE@mailman.edc.org
http://mailman.edc.org/mailman/listinfo/digitaldivide
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE 
in the body of the message.


Re: [DDN] $100 Laptop

2005-12-01 Thread Cindy Lemcke-Hoong
  
Hello Dave, 
Actually, it doesn't...it's a speculation on the direction 
of communications technology, and on what the next
milestones might be.

We can call it 'speculation' or we can call it 'foresight'. 
But one thing we should look it is the practicality of 
how much 'power/memory' a person really need? Especially if
we are talking about CHILD? I can understand about all the
arguement about upskilling of technologies etc., and that
infact is even more important one should think about 
upgrades etc. What is easier to deal with ... distributed 
model or centralized model? especially the kind of audiences
and environment we are looking at AT PRESENT (overtime situation
would change of course). 

Telecenters and using TV as access tool -- My question has 
always been: why do we need a PC? Most of the answers I would
receive these days is: get to the internet. In that case, then 
we are looking at a tool to access internet. NOT a lap-top per se. 
Any tool. A way to get to information. In that case, one 
should provide a solution that is as holistic as possible. 
A solution that not only provide access to the internet, 
but also able to train the end-users, support the
end-users etc. 

Let's envision their environment. NOT our environment. 
Think what a child would need. NOT the needs of well educated, and
perhaps with good income adults. 

Except for a sigle posting, I wish there are more participants 
from the field. Then we would be able to hear from the horses' mouths. 
(not intended as insult!)

  Cindy
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]



=

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
DIGITALDIVIDE mailing list
DIGITALDIVIDE@mailman.edc.org
http://mailman.edc.org/mailman/listinfo/digitaldivide
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE 
in the body of the message.


Re: [DDN] $100 Laptop

2005-11-29 Thread Cindy Lemcke-Hoong
Below is an interesting blog posting by Dave  Pollard of How to Save the World. 
It supports the  discussions/suggestions why telecenters or using television as 
access  tool to internet make much better sense.
  
  http://blogs.salon.com/0002007/   
  Sharing Your Brain: Making Your Hard Drive into a Wiki
  
  Cindy
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  



=

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
DIGITALDIVIDE mailing list
DIGITALDIVIDE@mailman.edc.org
http://mailman.edc.org/mailman/listinfo/digitaldivide
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE 
in the body of the message.


Re: [DDN] $100 laptop and seeds

2005-11-29 Thread Cindy Lemcke-Hoong
  
Hello Mark, 

You quoted two seperate postings of mine. I will 
just picked one of them to illustrate my point. 

Here is one of them: 

... reading lots of messages about how 
 such-and-such children in such-and-such 
 African country do not even have desks or 
 pencils.

This documentary film, made by Belgium TV net, was 
aired in Europe few months ago. Of course since 
it is Belgium Tv, and it is not main stream 
BBC World or CNN, therefore this documentary 
film might never reach the audience in the US. 

I just want to make it clear I do not 
write because it is sensational. 

Cindy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

  



=

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
DIGITALDIVIDE mailing list
DIGITALDIVIDE@mailman.edc.org
http://mailman.edc.org/mailman/listinfo/digitaldivide
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE 
in the body of the message.


Re: [DDN] $100 laptop and seeds

2005-11-28 Thread Cindy Lemcke-Hoong
Patricia Perkins -- Terry King's analogy about seeds
  
  Telecenters is not just the idea of sow seeds, but actually is  practical way 
of looking at what IS possible in certain environment. I  would think it is 
more appropriate to think of telecenters as as   'bed' for germinations? Where 
cares and supports are readily available?  
  
  Giving away a lap-top to every child in this world without the basic  
elements to support them, is just like THROWing seeds out randomly and  PRAY 
there will be rain, and there will not be hungry birds nearby ...  ??? 
  
  Cindy
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]





=

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
DIGITALDIVIDE mailing list
DIGITALDIVIDE@mailman.edc.org
http://mailman.edc.org/mailman/listinfo/digitaldivide
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE 
in the body of the message.


RE: [DDN] $100 laptop

2005-11-24 Thread Cindy Lemcke-Hoong
Hello Ken,
  
 The bottom line is that people value most the
 things that cost them most

I cannot agree more! Recently I VOLUNTERED and 
set up an online workshop for a group of 
teachers in China. Out of the 7 agreed to 
beta test the program, ONLY 2 made any effort to 
register, AND not a single one did any postings 
as required for the class. I am sure if they had
to pay for the training, they would have been
there. 

Actually the price tag is what 'the seller' try 
to impress the world. Personally I am not looking
at price-tag, but how useful is giving something
to someone that might be completely useless
because of issues such as infrastructures, training
, tech support etc. etc. etc. 

Most of all how many really need a full-features 
lap-top? A telecenter such as what you/HP provides
makes a lot more sense. Remember 'the water cooler'?
The real business world try to bring people together 
to share knowledge, and here we are giving each 
child a lap-top and deprive them the opportunities
to work together. 

Cindy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

  



=

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
DIGITALDIVIDE mailing list
DIGITALDIVIDE@mailman.edc.org
http://mailman.edc.org/mailman/listinfo/digitaldivide
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE 
in the body of the message.


Re: [DDN] Laptop for $100

2005-11-23 Thread Cindy Lemcke-Hoong
Hello Arun,
  
Much you have written were great and inline with
my thoughts. but What I am most fear is these lines:

We should wait till mid-2007, when hopefully a 
large number of children would have actually 
used the laptop, before we know if it is really as 
good as it is expected to be

BY they 100 millions UDS been spent ... and then
we should do an assessment? IF so much money has
been spent, even if it is disaster, nobody would
dare to say it especially those high officials who
signed the order (of 100millions lap-tops) !!

The discussions should go on and we should make as 
much noise as possible before a POSSIBLE great big 
spending goes down the wrong chute!

Cindy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

  



=

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
DIGITALDIVIDE mailing list
DIGITALDIVIDE@mailman.edc.org
http://mailman.edc.org/mailman/listinfo/digitaldivide
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE 
in the body of the message.


Re: [DDN] Re: $100 laptop

2005-11-23 Thread Cindy Lemcke-Hoong
Apology for not able to write perfect and coherentEnglish. Sorry, but here is 
what I wrote again: 
  
NO ... 1st world tools can solve 3rd world 
problems ... IF and ONLY they apply appropriately. 
... Sending a Yale professor to teach 
first year primary school English would not be the 
right tool I am sure??

Cindy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

  
Mark Warschauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:  NO ... 1st world tools can solve 
3rd world problems ...
Cindy

I guess that rules out your idea of using TVs! :-)
mark
___
DIGITALDIVIDE mailing list
DIGITALDIVIDE@mailman.edc.org
http://mailman.edc.org/mailman/listinfo/digitaldivide
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE 
in the body of the message.




=

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
DIGITALDIVIDE mailing list
DIGITALDIVIDE@mailman.edc.org
http://mailman.edc.org/mailman/listinfo/digitaldivide
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE 
in the body of the message.


Re: [DDN] Re: $100 laptop

2005-11-22 Thread Cindy Lemcke-Hoong
Hello Dave,
  
 Incidentally, the technology to use a 
 TV for two-way communication has been around for years...no MIT 
 development needed

PRECISELY !! It is available for the longest time (I just thought I play safe!) 
so why reinventing the wheel? Why spend money on another 'screen' where there 
might be already one in the home of the child? If not, I am sure is cheaper to 
provide a monitor than to provide a lap-top? Yes. I can see the argument about 
these days multimedia via broadband mean using the lap-top as TV!! but then is 
that what the lap-top is for ...  

As for if there is TV in their homes? WELL, more readily then they would go out 
and buy a computer!! You would be surprised. I am orginally from a 3rd world. 
And by the way, as has been discussed before on DDN before, one 3rd world 
country is not the same as the next one. Therefore one should not think a $100 
lap-top is beneficial for ALL the children in this world. 

NO ... 1st world tools can solve 3rd world problems ... IF and ONLY they apply 
at the appropriately. I am sure the organization you mentioned is of a 
different level and can fit in with what you offered? The $100 lap-top is for 
children. Your organization perhaps call for different skills and tools? 
Sending a Yale professor to teach first year primary school would not be the 
right tool I am sure?? 

Cindy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

  



=

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
DIGITALDIVIDE mailing list
DIGITALDIVIDE@mailman.edc.org
http://mailman.edc.org/mailman/listinfo/digitaldivide
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE 
in the body of the message.


Re: [DDN] Re: $100 laptop

2005-11-21 Thread Cindy Lemcke-Hoong
Reading some of the discussions on this list,  somehow they give me the 
impression some of the members on this list is  still using FIRST world tools 
to solve 3rd world problems. (Sorry to  use the terms first and 3rd worlds). 
  
  Not that long ago I wrote about children in some African countries do  not 
even have paper to write on. They do not have money to buy pencil  and exercise 
books. They use twig to trace and practice writing on the  chair/sandy ground 
they are sitting on. They have no chairs nor tables,  and if their parents do 
not have money to buy them a uniform they are  not even allow to attend class. 
So what would you do? Buy them a  uniform so that they can at least attend the 
class? Help them to  furnish their classroom with chairs and desks so that they 
can have  something to sit on? OR would you give these  same children with  the 
$100 lap-top with FLASH animations? Do you think this same child  would know 
how to use Google to search for information? 
  
  Furthermore, $100 might be dirt cheap in our world. The same $100 is a  lot 
of money in thier world. What would you want to provide them first  with?
  
  In my opinion, if anyone wishes to, they can turn the TV termnal into a  very 
useful interactive tool. IF one can use TV monitor to play games,  why can it 
not use the same TV monitor and turn it into a computer  screen? What is the 
different between TV and PC? TV is sending,  computer is both send and receive. 
I am sure some smart person from MIT  or the like, IF THEY REALLY WANT TO, can 
come up with a device.
  
  It would also make much more sense to create telecenters. Giving each  child 
a lap-top, you are looking at a ' distributed model' that is  composed of 
millions and millions of lap-tops. How are you going to  service them? or train 
the users? It would make much more sense to  create 'centralized 
model/telecenters' and have the users come to the  center to use the 
facilities. Not only it is easier to control and  manage, one can also start 
creating job for local populations to man  the telecenters. 
  
  Cindy
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  


=

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
DIGITALDIVIDE mailing list
DIGITALDIVIDE@mailman.edc.org
http://mailman.edc.org/mailman/listinfo/digitaldivide
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE 
in the body of the message.


Re: [DDN] $100 laptop

2005-11-21 Thread Cindy Lemcke-Hoong
Hello Amy,
  
  My students can not take home the computers. They rush to get here  
after-school and often stay until it is dark. They walk in the rain,  snow, 
and all types of weather, make their families wait to have  dinner, and BEG 
for more time to use the computers. We have family time  when parents and 
siblings come in and use the computers at the end of  class. Competition to 
get into my program is fierce and the waiting  list is long. We do go beyond 
giving access by training the students to  be certified professionals, but it 
is the access the computer that gets  them here. If I could send computers 
home, I could cut class time in  half and give twice as many students the 
opportunity
  
  I can see the reason you wish to have a PC for each child in your  programme. 
BUT don't you think there are benefits from the fact that  these same children 
have to fight for their computer times? And the  fact that their parents and 
siblings would be there to share time with  them? 
  
  Would you not agree, because they have to fight to have the use of the  
comptuers, they are better managing and organizing their lives/time? 
  
  Using internet to research work dosen't mean it is better. It only  means one 
can reach more information. It still depends on the person to  read and 
UNDERSTAND and DIGEST the information found. AND if the  teacher thinks handing 
in a hand-written homework is not good enough,  but has to be typed, then I 
think it is the short-sightedness of the  teachers and NOT because a 
hand-written work is any less productive  then one that is typed. 
  
  Cindy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



=

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
DIGITALDIVIDE mailing list
DIGITALDIVIDE@mailman.edc.org
http://mailman.edc.org/mailman/listinfo/digitaldivide
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE 
in the body of the message.


Re: [DDN] $100 Lap-top for every child in this world !!!

2005-11-20 Thread Cindy Lemcke-Hoong
So, how many millions of children do we have in  this world? And how many of 
them in countries that PERHAPS do not have  technical support to service these 
$100 laptop? 
  
  I have asked these questions before : who is going to pay for repairs?  Who 
is going to repair? Will they have tech support in even small  villages so that 
parents of these kids would not have to cycle or walk  miles to get the lap-top 
reparis? How about who is going to teach them  how to use it? How to type 
perhaps? 
  
  I for one is going to stop giving my hard earned money to non-profit  
organizations unless they can prove to me they have answers for these  very 
down-to-earth questions from me. I am not going to spend my meager  wages 
supporting MIT or anyone that is looking at, perhaps UN, to buy  100 millions 
PC from them. No way. 
  
  Cindy
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  



=

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
DIGITALDIVIDE mailing list
DIGITALDIVIDE@mailman.edc.org
http://mailman.edc.org/mailman/listinfo/digitaldivide
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE 
in the body of the message.


Re: [DDN] the refurbished computers timeline

2005-10-28 Thread Cindy Lemcke-Hoong
Hello Phil,

You brought out great concepts we should support. 

To me the point is not it will cost ONLY $99 per PC.
It is more important we should not throw things away
where there are still so much life in a product. 

It all depends on WHY we need a PC. If it is just to
send emails, search the net, one does not need to have
a 'loaded' PC to begin with. How many of us really
need gigabits of storage space?

I am a strong believer in recycling. AND an even
stronger believer of NOT to dispose of things unless
is necessary. Therefore, perhaps we should teach
people not to throw away PC that they can still use to
start with??  

Cindy
___
DIGITALDIVIDE mailing list
DIGITALDIVIDE@mailman.edc.org
http://mailman.edc.org/mailman/listinfo/digitaldivide
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE 
in the body of the message.


Re: [DDN] Creating the $100 Laptop

2005-10-03 Thread Cindy Lemcke-Hoong
Hello Pamela, Taran,

I took a quick look on the link on Solo, coupled with
solar wireless (one of Taran's recent posts), I see
other possibilities not limited to Nigeria/Africa or
developing world only. 

It is an interesting system. 

Cindy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
DIGITALDIVIDE mailing list
DIGITALDIVIDE@mailman.edc.org
http://mailman.edc.org/mailman/listinfo/digitaldivide
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE 
in the body of the message.


RE: [DDN] Creating the $100 Laptop

2005-10-02 Thread Cindy Lemcke-Hoong
Hello John,

I call it the Tyranny of the Instant. And it seems
to be getting worse.

This can be a topic on its own. I think many of the
DDN issues are more human and social. Such as this
one. It might have moved away from the original
subject topic, but ...

Personally I think most people took the 'instant'
motto  too far. With that we gradually
changing/destroying our private and social life. And
sometime political. Cell phones and instant messages
are not the only problem, we have CNN, BBC world news
and others that bring in good or bad news from around
the world instantly. I think we become 'frangmented'
because we are not 'allow' the time and the space to
think, to plan, to research more before taking action.
We are being pushed to give 'on the spot' decisions,
and then have to swallow the blame if something goes
wrong. I am sure many of us have seen enough of the
recent Katrina so called unfolding events. On certain
issues I like the exposures, but on others I don't
think it is really fair...

In the UK and I think also in NL, cell phone are
banned on some train carriages. Passengers just want
to have some peace and quiet moments while travelling.


When I used to teach there was a rule we all observed,
both instructors and trainees, cell phones and pages
off or on vibration. Most trainees (professionals)
also had the courtesy to inform the instructor before
hand they might step out for urgent calls. I am quite
amazed to see laptops in the classroom these days. I
think there is a place for everything. I can imagine
some would argue about taking notes, but how about the
noise from machines and typing that might be annoying
to others? What about curtesy to the lecturers or
speakers? Why are we accepting it? It is becasue we
are afraid others would call us old fashion? Or do we
really need to be so Instant? 

Cindy Hoong
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
DIGITALDIVIDE mailing list
DIGITALDIVIDE@mailman.edc.org
http://mailman.edc.org/mailman/listinfo/digitaldivide
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE 
in the body of the message.


RE: [DDN] Creating the $100 Laptop

2005-09-30 Thread Cindy Lemcke-Hoong
I for one absolutely agreed. 

Less than a year after I bought my Palm pilot, I
stopped using it. The bother of constantly having to
pull out my reading glasses before I could do anything
... Instead I regularly print a copy of my Yahoo
address book and the agenda... 

As for SMS ... for the same reason I seldom use it,
and I am not too please if someone send me one! 

For the young, and some professionals, cell phone and
WIFI are fashionable and/or on the go. But is it a
MUST? I wonder. 

Cindy 

___
DIGITALDIVIDE mailing list
DIGITALDIVIDE@mailman.edc.org
http://mailman.edc.org/mailman/listinfo/digitaldivide
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE 
in the body of the message.


Re: [DDN] Creating the $100 Laptop

2005-09-29 Thread Cindy Lemcke-Hoong
Many people are already creating cheap computing for
the masses, aside from the Simputer, and they have
things that are actually *working*, and don't get as
much media spin as Negroponte.

My question is: what is stopping DDN promoting
products such as Simputer? These companies are
generally too small, too short of cash to spend on
marketing. What is stopping DDN membership to promote
Simputer (or alike) to NGOs that can benefit from such
products? I see a win-win situation. 

Cindy



___
DIGITALDIVIDE mailing list
DIGITALDIVIDE@mailman.edc.org
http://mailman.edc.org/mailman/listinfo/digitaldivide
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE 
in the body of the message.


Re: [DDN] Virtual conferences

2005-09-18 Thread Cindy Lemcke-Hoong
John and All,

In 1990, about 14 years ago, I was researching for a
paper on video-conferencing. To my surprised, the
problem why video-conferencing was not popular, then,
had nothing to do with the technology, nor the
services provided by the phone companies etc. (It was
still rather expensive then and the technologies were
not really that great, but compared to paying for
hotels, flights etc. for participants naturally the
savings using video-conferencing won hands-down). Some
of the reasons were: it is much more fun to meet
face-to-face, in many cases travelling off-site is
considered perk for many people, meeting face-to-face
network better etc. etc. 

Since then, I have been observing and pondering over
this issue all these years and of course from
video-conferencing my interest shifted to internet and
elearning. 

Here are some of my own reasonings. Aside from perk
for participants, perhaps we should also look at
businesses such as hotels, air-lines, car-rentals,
catering, event organizers etc. These businesses
depend and encourage people to travel. If we all go
virtual, it is not just the matter of these businesses
are losing money, but we are also looking at people
losing jobs. And most of the employees of this
business sector are low-skills. Which means if they
lose thier job it is so much harder for them to find
another job because they might be 'skill-out' from the
faster and faster moving world that demand higher and
higher digital skills. Therefore it is a real
balancing act (I sure hope governments are paying
attention and looking into all these factors). 

The problem with our group (DDN) is, most of us are
highly educated, have good jobs, good income, well
equipped or provided with all the digital gadgets that
enabled us to be 'virtual'. But are we the minority or
the majority? As Siobhan just posted: Stephens
estimates that 70 percent of Navajo Nation residents
are still
without phone service, down from 78 percent before
cell service.
http://www.gallupindependent.com/2005/sept/091505onsat.html
. 

Today I also found an interesting article from The
Economist Sept 17-23rd, 2005 (I have not had the
chance to read it yet) title How the Internet killed
the phone business. I worked for US long distance
compay and telco manufacturers from 1992-2002 and
major in telco mgmt., without having to read the
article I think I know most of the stories. 

So, internet killed telephone business, I am one of
the many thousands who lost our well paid jobs. I am
sure we also see jobs going away from post-offices,
business cards, birthday cards, printing etc. etc. The
world is changing, is evolving and there is no way we
could stop it from happening. BUT, if we so wish to
push the concepts of DDN, perhaps we should also pay
attention to other factors that are happening in our
society/world. If our intention is to help those that
are less advantage, perhaps we should look at it in a
much more complete picture and avoid looking at just a
fragmented segment. 

Just some of my sketchy thoughts.  

Cindy

___
DIGITALDIVIDE mailing list
DIGITALDIVIDE@mailman.edc.org
http://mailman.edc.org/mailman/listinfo/digitaldivide
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE 
in the body of the message.


Re: [DDN] Re: Red Cross may be slow, but...

2005-09-05 Thread Cindy Lemcke-Hoong
 Over and over again I have  heard it said (on TV
and   radio) that the Internet has been
instrumental, in fact  crucial, in facilitating
access to information andcommunications when
other more traditional methods have  failed. I think
this is a magnificent example of how   the Internet,
an open and free human arena, not widelly  controlled
by special interests

Here we see another divide that this list touched on
(perhaps differently), and then ignored. 

Here is language divide in a different way. Internet
is a written world, and whether we like to acknoledge
it or not, buying a computer and have internet access
is a lot more expensive than a mobile phone (a spoken
world). 

Podcasting might eventually adresses the problem, the
bottom line is if a person has no knowledge of how
internet works, they might not know podcasting is
voice. 

Cindy
___
DIGITALDIVIDE mailing list
DIGITALDIVIDE@mailman.edc.org
http://mailman.edc.org/mailman/listinfo/digitaldivide
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE 
in the body of the message.


Re: [DDN] SMS vs phones: a New Orleans perspective

2005-09-02 Thread Cindy Lemcke-Hoong
Hello Taran,

Good to lear another thing from you ... The Alert
Retrieval Cache concept. I have been away from telco
too long. It is new to me. 

But can this be set up in advance? What I mean is can
it be something just like 911 for example. It is there
and every knows it. When it is emergency they just
dial that number. In this case SMS the number. 

Therefore can ARC be set up (for example SMS 767) by
all service providers such as SBC, ATT in their
databases? To me it is always too late to do such a
thing when disaster strikes. It has to be organized
and managed in PERMANENT way where the pubic know
about it without having to be told or force to use
threaten to throw them out of SuperDom. :-(  

Thanks
Cindy


___
DIGITALDIVIDE mailing list
DIGITALDIVIDE@mailman.edc.org
http://mailman.edc.org/mailman/listinfo/digitaldivide
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE 
in the body of the message.


Re: [DDN] Hurricane Katrina mobcast launched

2005-09-01 Thread Cindy Lemcke-Hoong
Mobile phone depends on antenna towers. Towers toppled
easily with such strong gusts of wind. That has always
been the weakest point of mobile/wireless technology.
Even if you have satellites, you still need to beam up
and down. 

And with all flooding surrounding New Orleans, you
cannot send in mobile antenna Van units. That can be
one of the fastest way to restore some communications.
Althought I don't see why it cannot be done in the dry
areas?  

Cindy


___
DIGITALDIVIDE mailing list
DIGITALDIVIDE@mailman.edc.org
http://mailman.edc.org/mailman/listinfo/digitaldivide
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE 
in the body of the message.


RE: [DDN] Spanish Language materials at midst of controversy

2005-08-12 Thread Cindy Lemcke-Hoong
Hello All:
 
As a person who speak 4, 5 languages (not to boost my ability but to illustrate 
the possible problems), and constantly lived/live in countries that I have to 
use languages that I am not absolutely fluent with, I become quite critical 
about usefulness/harm languages would do to a person. In the Netherlands, we 
also have problems with immigrants that either willingly or unwillingly do not 
have the Dutch language skills (some immigrants do not think they should learn 
the language since Dutch is a minority langauge in international arena), 
therefore leading to many social issues associated with Dutch language skills 
such as isolation from the community/sociaty at large, employment issues 
because of language skills etc. etc. 
 
Language is the medium for communications. But human language is also the most 
important skills one should master for advancement in many careers such as 
lawyer, or managers of any levels. Without strong language skills, there is no 
way such professionals could articulate their thoughts either verbally or in 
writting. And of course digital divide.
 
Therefore I think, first and foremost the national language should be enforced. 
Other languages should be encouraged as added skills. While in the US I came to 
understand there are many arguement if Spanish should be equally important as 
English. For the sake of arguement, should Chinese or Japanese or Korean or 
Portugese or Italian or Polish or Russian ... be the official language 
side-by-side with English? The problem with MAKING Spanish as important as 
English is, then most Spanidh speaking persons would NOT think it necessary to 
learn English since they could get by with Spanish (such is the case in the 
Nehterlands, most official documents and notices are translated into Turkish, 
Arabic to make sure the Morokkan and Turkish population are included. Which I 
absolutely disagree. In doing so the Morokkan and Turkish no longer think it is 
necessary for them to learn the Dutch langauge hence creating even larger and 
long term problems). BUT can the rest of the population get !
 by
 without learning Spanish if they so wish to communicate with the Spanish 
speaking population? Would that also mean making other language groups the 
burden of having to learn TWO languages (English and Spanish) in order to 
survive in the US in equal term? 
 
For some of us who are lucky to born with two languages or more, and the fact 
that some of us are more talented in languages, or our personal status allow us 
the luxury of learning more than 1 language, our thoughts perhaps should be 
looking at what is most appropriate for running a country, or a company. Short 
term solution generally looks attractive. 
 
Just my 2 cents on the subject about language divide. I can see the arguement 
from both sides. Just like I can see the problem the IT world (or digital 
divide world) with the dominating English language (English is my 3rd 
language). The dominating party should not be too HAPPY about being the 
dominating party. What they are missig is the talents from ALL the others. 
Eventually who is being excluded? 
 
Cindy
Paul Mondesire [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all:

To many people public service is a zero sum game--if there are resources 
allocated to accomodate the needs of one segment of a community, they must be 
being taken from MY community. Add in the English Only faction and you have a 
fairly typical hyperbolic debate.

In 1967, Lillian Lopez (my aunt, and the first Puerto Rican to reach a position 
of significance in the New York Public Library system) was instrumental in the 
creation of what came to be known as the South Bronx Project. This initiative 
offered services tailored to the people of the neighborhoods they served 
bringing in more Spanish language resources and being more inclusive rather 
than exclusive in their attitude towards the community. The follow-up studies 
showed an increase in circulation and in the overall delivery of library 
services thus the model spread more broadly throughout the city and beyond. 
This was part of the foundation of what has become known as multi-cultural 
education efforts in our nation and is a part of my late aunt's (may she rest 
in Peace) wonderful legacy.

I share that to say this: those fighting against such an initiative should 
spend additional time in the library, period. They can then read about anything 
and everything they choose and be supportive of those from other cultures who 
are trying to learn something new. Reading and educating oneself are 
traditional means of moving up in our society and learning the value of what 
being a citizen of these United States really means. In my view, fighting 
against high quality, broad-based library services for all people in a 
community is simply bad public policy if you want everyone to buy into the 
notion of cooperative effort, building a sense of brotherhood, and mutual 
understanding. 

That's just my 

Re: [DDN] Life 8 and cancelling 40 billions debts

2005-07-08 Thread Cindy Lemcke-Hoong
Hi Jorge,
 
 As you can see, neither S. Africa, Rhodesia nor  Zimbabwe are included in 
 the list (snipped)
 
I did not use these countries to illustrate they should or have receive debts 
cancellations. I am only highlighting one of the 'why' of poverty CREATION. 
 
Cindy

 
___
DIGITALDIVIDE mailing list
DIGITALDIVIDE@mailman.edc.org
http://mailman.edc.org/mailman/listinfo/digitaldivide
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE 
in the body of the message.


Re: [DDN] Life 8 and cancelling 40 billions debts

2005-07-07 Thread Cindy Lemcke-Hoong
All,
Below is the most recent newsletter from the European Network for Debt and 
Development (EURODAD). The content is related to this thread. 
 
Cindy
--
The European Network for Debt and Development (EURODAD) believes that the World 
Bank must radically improve the way it designs and applies its conditions in 
order to make aid more effective in reducing poverty. New civil society 
research undertaken in 2005 has found that; 

 · World Bank Conditions have risen not fallen in low income 
countries - Benin, for example, has moved from 58 conditions in its first 
Poverty Reduction Strategy Credits (PRSC) to 130 conditions in its second PRSC

· Country Ownership is actively not being respected by the 
Bank, which is continuing to impose controversial conditions like privatisation 
on low income countries even when these are not within countries nationally 
development poverty strategies. For example, condition to privatise health care 
services in Senegal and the condition to privatise water management in Guyana

· Conditions are still not clearly linked to program objectives.

 The forthcoming 2005 World Bank Conditionality Review offers a unique 
opportunity for the Bank to outline a much-needed bold and ambitious reform 
agenda.  Recent reforms by the World Bank on conditionality, including the new 
operational policy on Development lending, which calls for ‘critical’ 
conditions only, greater transparency and more participation in setting 
conditions, do not go nearly far enough and are not being properly implemented

 Eurodad has sent a letter to all the Executive Director’s of the World Bank, 
ahead of their board meeting on 21st July highlighting the current failures and 
calling for: 

 · A cessation of all economic policy conditionality 

· A dramatic reduction in binding and non-binding conditions

· More transparency, parliamentary oversight and CSO 
participation in Bank lending negotiations

· Greater linkages between conditions and overall program 
objectives, including more use of independent poverty and social impact 
analysis 

· An urgent review of the World Bank’s Country Policy and 
Institutional Assessment Framework

 For full Eurodad letter: http://www.eurodad.org/articles/default.aspx?id=635



NEWS: Aid Backlash – Growing voices argue aid is not the answer 


 In the run up to the G8 Summit with campaigners hoping for a political 
commitment to increase aid by the world’s richest nations, voices of discontent 
have been rising over the impact of aid on reducing poverty. The IMF has 
released two extensive research papers that suggest aid flows to poor countries 
have not led to higher growth rates, Moeletsi Mbeki, brother of South African 
President Thabo Mbeki and deputy chairman of the South African Institute of 
International Affairs has also issued a new book which is highly critical of 
aid and finally, African leaders attending the African Union Summit in Libya 
this week have also registered their discontent. 

 The IMF’s new studies, which took into account duration, type of donor and 
governance record of recipient, found aid did not boost growth. This conflicts 
with findings of an influential World Bank study five years ago that found aid 
boosted growth in countries with good policy environments. “We need to be 
careful given the chequered history of aid, that we do not place more hopes on 
aid as an instrument of development than it is capable of delivering,” the fund 
said in a recent article in the Financial Times ( Aid will not lift growth in 
Africa, June 29th). In the article, the author of the new reports, Raghuram 
Rajan, noted that aid needs to be more effective, but argued that this will 
mean more than just good governance “It is not the case that all that matters 
is good governance,” said Raghuram Rajan, “We know far less about what makes 
aid work than the public or governments would like. By acting like we know all 
the answers raises false expectations.”

 Moeletsi Mbeki, author of 'Perpetuating Poverty in sub-Saharan Africa' and 
brother of South African president Thabo Mbeki has also recently questioned the 
value of more aid to Africa. In an article originally published in the New 
Statesman (Aid must help people, not governments July 4th) Mbeki notes the 
negative political impact aid can have – “one of the unintended consequences of 
foreign aid is to make African governments even less accountable to their 
people because they do not need their taxes and therefore their consent.”  
Mbeki goes on to argue that “the real freedom Africans need is not just shows 
of democratic reform but real institutional reforms: property rights and the 
rule of law.”  Whilst, the real trade justice they need is “free trade with 
each other, within their countries and with each other's countries, free of 
compulsory-purchase 

[DDN] Life 8 and cancelling 40 billions debts

2005-07-04 Thread Cindy Lemcke-Hoong
Hello Jorge, Taran
 
Watching Life 8 yesterday, and listening to interviews of some people who are 
involved with NGOs work, some of their concerns parallel with what you wrote 
and what some of us must be wondering often.
 
Cancelling debts would not solve the problems in poor country. In fact by 
cancelling debts, that means IMF and World Bank would no longer receive the 
'interests' they once would. Therefore IMF and World Bank would need more 
contributions from the wealthier nations. And as the circle would complete -- 
since more money would have to reserve fir IMF and World Bank, wealthier 
nations would have less to spare for their own 'development funds'. So, what 
would that mean to other 'poor and developing' countries that do not fall in 
the same catagories as the poorest countries? They would receive less aids and 
perhaps eventually would join the 'poorest countriest'. 
 
Another question that was raised is, for the past 20 or 30 years, millions and 
millions of dollars have been allocated to support developing works in the 
continent of Africa. Where have they GONE? In fact I was just thinking about S. 
Africa, or Rhodesia. One point in time they were not really that poor. They 
might have racial problems, but compared with what we see these days, were 
their lives better then or now? Is the size of their poor reduced? Have their 
social services improved? Have their discriminations under control OR perhaps 
now they find a different breed of people to discrimate of? 
 
Look at Zimbabwe. What are we seeing? Why there were hardly any actions from 
the US or UK governments 2 or 3 years ago when white farmers were beaten up, 
killed, and their farms were taken and given to the croonies of Mogabe? Why was 
it so easy for US and UK to come up with reasons to invade Iraq and Saddam was 
toppled, BUT Mogabe is left to run amok? The farms that were taken from the 
white farmers what have become to them? What happened to those workers who once 
had jobs with the white farmers? Have an income or a place to stay in the 
farms? Look at what happened to the shanty towns that are being torn and burn 
the past 3 weeks in Zimbabwe? Is the US doing anything? Is UK government doing 
anything? 
 
So, right now Blair and Bush are talking about writing off 40 billions debts. 
What is the us of giving money when the fundamental problems are not taken care 
of? What is the use of giving money to the like of Mogabe when he is 
respondible for destroying the country? 
 
The problem with politicians is, they go for BIG name tag that makes them look 
good. It is PR that is important to them. Right now Blair and Bush are working 
on reparing the damages of their own reputations. So are we going to sit and 
watch and let them mess this up further? Or can DDN do something more 
constructive?
 
Cindy

___
DIGITALDIVIDE mailing list
DIGITALDIVIDE@mailman.edc.org
http://mailman.edc.org/mailman/listinfo/digitaldivide
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE 
in the body of the message.


Re: [DDN] Podcast me a lecture (the educational piece)

2005-06-23 Thread Cindy Lemcke-Hoong
Hello Anne, Brigitte
 
 Often it is the foreign students who really understand the
 value of the education and opportunities that are offered in this
 country because they have lived in countries where such rights do not
 exist. 

We are touching on issues that are so large, really there is no one correct 
answer. I would just comment on two points. 
 
Anne: You are right. In general American students do not understand the good 
fortune they have. I can never understand why there is the problem for young 
people to go to college. When I was struggling to pay for my tuition fees 
(foreign students have to pay astronomical tuition fees as compared to American 
students. For example for local student is 15 usd for 3-units at City college 
at SF in 1990, I had to pay 105 for the same course if I remembered correctly), 
I can NEVER understand why there were not more Americans taking the advantage? 
Tuitions are so cheap for local students (already paid by tax contribution by 
their parents after all !). Furthermore there are student aids, zillion of 
scholarship for American students etc. And for the minority such as American 
Indians and African Americans, financial help to these people were incredible. 
 
Brigitte: 
 many foreign students were already privileged in terms of education
 
There are many catagories of foreign students. Some were sent by their 
governments, some with very wealthy parents, some have low income parents but 
talented, some self-supporting such as myself. And of course there are so many 
different nations in the pool of 'foreign students'. Again not something that 
is so clear-cut
 
I am not sure what 'privileged'  specifically is in this case. Personally I 
think it is the social expectation, life style and mentality of American as 
compared to other nationatlities/races. To Asians (as I am Asian in origin), 
education is the most important legacy any parents should give to a child. And 
we were schooled from young age that study is our JOB as a child. And we should 
go as high as we can. It is ingrained in our cultures. In the US, it is a known 
fact second generation Asian immigrants are generally doing better that other 
students. Therefore I think we can ruled out whether the local schools are good 
or bad. In fact parents of Asian students very likely would find ways to make 
sure their kids eventually would go to good universities therefore making great 
personal sacrafice.
 
American cultures place different values in thier life styles. Unfortunately, 
with some families, education is not at forefront. IF a person really has a 
very strong belief that education is what he/she wants, this person can find 
the means to move forward in that direction in the US without much problems AT 
ALL. 
 
Cindy
 

___
DIGITALDIVIDE mailing list
DIGITALDIVIDE@mailman.edc.org
http://mailman.edc.org/mailman/listinfo/digitaldivide
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE 
in the body of the message.


Re: [DDN] podcast me a lecture (the educational piece)

2005-06-22 Thread Cindy Lemcke-Hoong
Hello Teresa,
 
 There were many times in college I wish I had
 had the opportunity to listen to a lecture again - not because of the
 brilliance of the content, but rather because the content had eluded me
 during the 50 or 90 minutes of class.
 
One point in time we used to tape the lectures so that we can listen it over 
and over again. It is especially true for foreign students such as myself 
studying in the US. 
 
BUT .. the departure here is ... WE took the responsibility to tape the 
lectures ourselves. WE attended the lectures, we asked permission to tape the 
lectures.
 
My initial command is: students should take the responsibility of 'lectures' 
instead of being pampered. Again this is my personal opinion because I take 
strongly that students should at least understand the minimum requirement of 
respect FOR their lecturer ... attend the lectures and show your keeness. 
 
Over the years, I see so much attention pay to technology, but we forget about 
how to raise responsible citizens. We forget about the social aspects of many 
things. Therefore even if we have the greatest digital bridging initiatives, 
would that stand the chance being topedo because there is no social and human 
decency to support it? 
 
Digital Divide is a social problem . NOT a technology problem. 
 
Cindy

___
DIGITALDIVIDE mailing list
DIGITALDIVIDE@mailman.edc.org
http://mailman.edc.org/mailman/listinfo/digitaldivide
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE 
in the body of the message.


RE: [DDN] podcast me a lecture

2005-06-19 Thread Cindy Lemcke-Hoong
Hello Siobhan,
 
Here is an excerpt from the editorial of The New York Time titled: A Timely 
Departure. 
 
Quote: 
And finally, it's not necessary to reinvent the wheel. One reason the Fast 
Track Initiative got going quickly was that it did not waste years in 
assembling a staff of neophytes who narrowly defined strategies for growth to 
fit their ideological bent. The Millennium Challenge program granted $108 
million to Madagascar for, of all things, land-titling, bank reform and 
agribusiness centers. Those are worthy endeavors, but this is a country where 
many villages do not have running water, clinics or schools. Bank reform is 
fine, but real growth cannot exclude the basics. Malnourished people are not 
going to make good businesspeople or farmers. And they are certainly not going 
to be asking for directions to the bank. (end of quote)
 
For full article: 
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/19/opinion/19sun1.html?themc=th
 
Cindy
 
___
DIGITALDIVIDE mailing list
DIGITALDIVIDE@mailman.edc.org
http://mailman.edc.org/mailman/listinfo/digitaldivide
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE 
in the body of the message.


RE: [DDN] podcast me a lecture

2005-06-19 Thread Cindy Lemcke-Hoong
Siobhan,
 
I was asked to trim-off unnecessary message and repost ... So here is what you 
wrote:
 
 So, is the question, should money be spent in different ways - not to 
enhance technology for those who already have it, but to provide it to those 
who don't. Would you say
that summarizes your questions? Or is that too simple?

Here is my answer: I did not say -- not to enchance technology for those who 
already have it ... One can enchance whatever one wishes, but should not 
context be the focus of decisions? What kind of behaviours are we teaching 
students to be the average RESPONSIBLE citizens of the future? What kind of 
leaders are we hoping to bring them to this world if we do not put some common 
sense of basic social interactions such as respect, responsibilities etc. ? 
Although the university might be doing it with good faith, but the reason 
behind it (please read the first mail that start off this thread) is just 
ridiculous and pampering. What kind of Higher Education instituion the 
administor is portraying to the public? That is my major question about 
pod-casting at Coventry University. 
 
Secondly, YES, my thought is as simple as that. We are talking about 'digitial 
divide', I suppose that should be for the people who has less than the average 
person. Or sometime NONE. Simple and down to earth thinking sometime is all 
that is needed. Don't you agree? Complexity dosen't mean BETTER if it is not 
called for. In fact, often time complexity only create confusion. 
 
Solving a problem should not be just band-aid solution especially one as large 
as digital divivde. Furthermore, without properly defined what we are looking 
at, I am sure all of us are have our perspectives while looking at digital 
divide. Perhaps to some digital divide is podcasting a lecture (still i do not 
see how that should solve the dd issue except instead of sending a video tape 
now the individual can download it themselves), as for myself I am looking at 
the people who basically have nothing except a few pots to cook food in, or 
going to a mud-hut as schoolroom, sitting on the mud floor because there is no 
chairs or tables in the room except the black board, or to use a twig to trace 
the letters on the sand --- the pencils and exercise books of the students. 
What then would all the technologies good to these people when the FUNDAMENTAL 
structure to support things such as electricity at home is not available? Many 
of these people still cook food with firewood. 
 
If the arguement is well, there must be some that have them ... these 'some' 
are the 'elite' in their environment. The high officials and their families, 
the well to do, the expatriates etc. So, yes, there are people who can spend 
money on all these fancy things even in the poorest place. BUT what is the 
focus of this forum? 
 
I am not advertising to stop technological advancement, my question is 'do we 
need them'? How do management make decision to put money at where? Take the 
case of elearning. It is totally a market and money driven concept without much 
thoughts given to learning to start with. See where it is going after 10 years 
of ooh and h ?? How much money do you think have been spent on all these 
wonderful systems? How many educational establishments have been lured into 
believing 'if I build them they will come'?, how many failed and cancelled 
proejcts? Perhap we want to ask why these system failed miserably? I don't 
think we understand quite yet (perhaps we do not want to understand) the impact 
ON learning from the push to e-learning. There is no problem with technologies, 
but perhaps there is problem with the basic structure of bringing it to the 
people? 
 
And I see the samething we are looking at DD. 
 
By the way, gadgets such as Skype are not free. We all pay for our internet 
services. Skype and other VoIP products are making use of the 'voice band' of 
the 'digital connection'. But to benefit from Skype and other such product, one 
must first have a PC, an internet connection. So, who can benefit from such 
gadgets? If I am correct, so is PodCasting. If I understand correctly, it is a 
form of VOICE blogging
 
Cindy

 

___
DIGITALDIVIDE mailing list
DIGITALDIVIDE@mailman.edc.org
http://mailman.edc.org/mailman/listinfo/digitaldivide
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE 
in the body of the message.


RE: [DDN]The Personal vs the Social Computer Was: Update on the Simputer

2005-05-28 Thread Cindy Lemcke-Hoong
Hello Dr. Eskow,
 
I am quoting below what you wrote: 
 
There are, however, proximate as well as ultimate goals, there are
appropriate and intermediate technologies as well as advanced
technologies--there are, that is, advantages to using bicycles rather 
than automobiles for certain situations calling for transport.
 
As far as I understand, the Simputer from Amida is with the focus for the needs 
of a particular environment ... India to start with. But I think it is also for 
a certain group of people that are perhaps not that advance in using a PC. 
 
I understand your arguement here, but I think we also should look at the needs 
of the target audience. For a farmer that perhaps have limited education, what 
this person might need is a simple tool that can help him with storing contact 
information, simple calculation of the goods he needs or prices etc. etc. 
Perhaps the environment of this person can only supports the usage of ' a 
bicycle/Amida Simputer'. Giving him an 'automobile/100 USD PC'  would not only 
be a waste of money, but an eye-sore. He might not have the electricity to 
power his PC, a key-board might become a scary thing to look at, a mouse is 
another worry. If the PC dosen't work he might have a problem to transport the 
thing to have it fix etc. etc. 
 
There is no such thing as what is good or what is bad, but it can be good or 
bad for certain situation. Sometime we forget, since most of us, such as 
yourself,  are highly educated and live in the first world, we tend to forget 
some of the things that seems so simple for us is actually VERY complex to many 
people in this world (even in the first world). Complexity can be seen as 
motivation for learning, BUT it can also deter some people and scare them away. 
I have an elderly friend who is a very well educated mechanical engineer but 
have such bad experience with the mouse (he has problem to control the movement 
of the mouse with his hand!) he just refused to use a PC. Instead he is using 
an old fashion type-writer. 
 
Is Amida Simputer or Dell PC a better tool is really something depends on the 
users. I think what we should look at is: is it a good tool? 
 
Granted at this point the Simputer seems to be expensive as compare with a PC 
or a lap-top. BUT I am sure anyone has some idea of product life-cycle would 
have no problem to understand the reasons. 
 
Cindy
 
 

___
DIGITALDIVIDE mailing list
DIGITALDIVIDE@mailman.edc.org
http://mailman.edc.org/mailman/listinfo/digitaldivide
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE 
in the body of the message.


Re: [DDN] Hardware: What Happened to Simputer? (via Slashdot)

2005-04-18 Thread Cindy Lemcke-Hoong
Hello Taran,
 
I am very happy you sent the report from Slashdot, plus your response to it. 
 
I am not a software person, but I agreed with you that the NGOs community, 
perhaps, should give more thoughts into using Simputer. I remembered distinctly 
a DDN member from India wrote a detailed posting few weeks ago regarding why 
Simputer is useful for certain communities in India. 
 
Quoting the report from UN ICT Policy Task Force Satish Jha: Unfortunately, 
productising anything like simputer is something that requires a lot more than 
very fine minds. It requires the experience of dealing with markets, product 
creation capability and manufacturing prowess at the cutting edge of 
productivity --- well, how about shipping cost from USA to India ( re: the 
MIT's $100 Laptop) would that not add cost to the product? Just a simple 
example. What about customer support where there would be language barrier? 
Would that not be another cost if we look at time (costing from both customer 
and customer support) = money? 
 
What nagging me as well, could the issue of most NGOs not 'originated' from 
India be another barrier? Can they be convinced to support 'local' product? 
Provinding employment for local people? 
 
Furthermore we sometime seems to forget there are people who can only manage 
simple tool (not because they are dumb but they never had the chance to catch 
up with technologies). In our rash to close the digital gap, we think everyone 
should have the best available without really understand the conditions of what 
the audience need. Providing a 1st world lap-top to someone who might only  
need the tool for simple tracking of income, contact info etc. would be like 
giving a Catepillar harveseter to someone who has only a pocket-size plot of 
land???
 
I hope more people from this community would speak up and support your 
concerns. 
 
Cindy


___
DIGITALDIVIDE mailing list
DIGITALDIVIDE@mailman.edc.org
http://mailman.edc.org/mailman/listinfo/digitaldivide
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE 
in the body of the message.


Re: [DDN] Technology Blackout Day

2005-03-31 Thread Cindy Lemcke-Hoong
Hello Bonnie,

Good for you! ... I am not saying that I should think less about the situation 
in Africa. 
 
Since telecommunications is such powerful tool, perhaps we should use more of 
TV (that's why most people would receive their news and images of the rest of 
the world) to broadcast NOT ALL IS GOLD in the rich countries. This is one very 
effective tool to help bring the RIGHT information to the people. 
 
After 30 odd years as an immigrant (moving to many different countries), I 
understand just too well what are the disadvantages being a poor foreigner. 
Some time I wonder if I would have achieved much more if I had  stayed in my 
old country. Therefore I am all for keeping the people where they are 
especially those that are not well equipped (langauge, eduction) to establish a 
better life away from their familiar environment. To do so, I think TV could be 
use to educate the people. Start showing them realities. I will never forget my 
train ride from Washing D.C to New Orleans. Or Bronx in the 80s. 
 
Immigration creates lots of problems for the person, and for both societies -- 
the one that is losing the people and the one that is gaining. Even if 
countries such as Australia, NZ and Canada where they have a system to pick the 
best, eventually this system will come back to haunt them. They are creating an 
elite 'immigrant' divide. 
 
Anyway ... that is a different story. 
 
Cindy

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

In a message dated 3/28/05 9:06:47 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


 
 There are people in Africa that do not have running water or flush toilets.
 

There are native Americans and poor people in rural areas that do not have 
running water or flush toilets in America. Did i mention no phones either? 
Bonnie Bracey
bbracey at aol com
___
DIGITALDIVIDE mailing list
DIGITALDIVIDE@mailman.edc.org
http://mailman.edc.org/mailman/listinfo/digitaldivide
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE 
in the body of the message.
___
DIGITALDIVIDE mailing list
DIGITALDIVIDE@mailman.edc.org
http://mailman.edc.org/mailman/listinfo/digitaldivide
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE 
in the body of the message.


Re: FW: [DDN] Simputer

2005-03-29 Thread Cindy Lemcke-Hoong
Hello All,
 
This is the link Taran sent on Simputer http://amidasimputer.com/khatha/
 
If we look at the needs of the 'pressumed' (I am guessing) target audience in 
India, this piece of equipment is design with them in mind. At least some of 
the target audience. 
 
Furthermore it is both landline and wireless. If Reliance is giving a good per 
minute price, I think it is not bad at all. 
 
Cindy

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One other interesting factor in the use of the Simputer, is the access to a 
source, to use the computer. There are some unusual ones and often that 
discussion is lacking. There have been various ways posted of using alternate 
energy 
sources. This comes from actually working in places where I have seen a lot of 
computers chained down to desktops with no source of electricity , and with 
some concern about when or where this source will be found. There are some 
great solutions.

In discussing the use of the simputer, and other technologies, I too would 
assume that some education is necessary, though I know about the hole in the 
wall, experiments. One of the errors in the US educational system has been the 
lack of involvement to help teachers make transformational use of new 
technologies of all kind. This is a frequent error.

Sincerely
Bonnie Bracey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
DIGITALDIVIDE mailing list
DIGITALDIVIDE@mailman.edc.org
http://mailman.edc.org/mailman/listinfo/digitaldivide
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE 
in the body of the message.
___
DIGITALDIVIDE mailing list
DIGITALDIVIDE@mailman.edc.org
http://mailman.edc.org/mailman/listinfo/digitaldivide
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE 
in the body of the message.


Re: [DDN] Regarding the cellphone users

2005-03-13 Thread Cindy Lemcke-Hoong
The reason why mobile is used in many developing countries is with good reason. 
And I support them. It just takes too much time to put in land-lines. A 
wireless system can be operational within months if not weeks. Provided basic 
telco infrastructures is in placed, and there is electricity (these days it is 
common to see solar energy being deployed ... again it is quick and cheap) ...
 
As for pre-paid, we also have to understand situation with credits etc. etc. 
For example, if I want to install a phone in my house, or even to sign-up for a 
mobile phone serves in The Netherlands, I need to show them my bank account, my 
social security number etc. etc. ... Well, I think most of these people would 
be stucked very quickly by all these legalities. So, pre-paid again is the most 
efficient. All they perhaps have to have is the money to get a phone and some 
start-up money ... (perhaps here is where old mobile phones can be collected as 
donation ??? if system is the same and frequencies bands is the same ??? )
 
Most time one would find the mobile phone would help them to start 'something' 
and start an income. And that we should encourage. 
 
Cindy

A. K. Mahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Further to the comments on mobile, it is also important to differentiate 
the pre-paid mobile sector, which is increasingly used in developing 
countries as a stand-in for fixed-line connections. 

For Africa, the percentage of mobile users who use prepaid is 85.3%. 
Generally, the poorer the country, the higher the level of prepaid use. 
Although increased connectivity is nothing to denigrate, there is 
nonetheless a clear contrast to countries with well-developed telecom 
infrastructure, where pre-paid is a choice among various mobile, and 
indeed, overall telecommunications services. 

The point is not to argue that mobile should not be used to extend the 
network – but to argue that if mobile (or more specifically, prepaid 
mobile) is being used instead of fixed line networks, then attention to 
social regulation needs to be adjusted; and lessons from mobile market 
developments need to be considered as a more formal element of the 
intersection of regulation and development strategies. 

The ITU Africa Telecommunication Indicators 2004 report notes that the 
only African countries for which mobile has not surpassed fixed line 
connections are those that either lack a mobile network or mobile 
competition. 

--
Amy Mahan
Montevideo, Uruguay






___
DIGITALDIVIDE mailing list
DIGITALDIVIDE@mailman.edc.org
http://mailman.edc.org/mailman/listinfo/digitaldivide
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE 
in the body of the message.
___
DIGITALDIVIDE mailing list
DIGITALDIVIDE@mailman.edc.org
http://mailman.edc.org/mailman/listinfo/digitaldivide
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE 
in the body of the message.


Re: [DDN] The real digital divide (fwd)

2005-03-12 Thread Cindy Lemcke-Hoong
Hello Tom, 
 
You said : 
Why in a remote village in Bangladesh when the urban poor in the streets of 
Dhaka mean you 
could begin right after landing.
 
One reason I could think of is to stop migration. Young people from villages 
tend to move to big cities to find a 'better living', or being attracted by the 
choices. I came from a small village. After high school I left and went to the 
capital and eventually went abroad 35 years ago. I am one of the lucky ones 
because I am now in the same crowd as all of you, sitting infront of a PC and 
tell the world the plight of the poor and less fortunate. Most time I just feel 
down-right guilty. 
 
Countries such as China ... constructions in cities attracted villagers. One 
reason is, as a labourer, you don't need to know too much reading. Just pure 
muscle. And miserable lives. I saw that in China, Singapore (that was in the 
80s, where foreign workers from Bangladesh, Indonesia, Malaysia lived in 
deplorable conditions as compared to the local. The Malaysian faired better 
since their home is only a hop away ...), now in Malaysia ... 
 
Digital Divide, migrations, refugees, education, corruptions, tyrants etc. etc. 
etc. ... go hand-in-hand. Taking care of one without managing the others is not 
going to work. If we look at all the ills created by migrations at this present 
moment in Europe, or any where eles in this world, then I am asking is DDN 
looking at the right directions? Is DDN working with the right stakeholders and 
partners? It has to be cohesive 'managing' and not with a one track mind of 
solving just DD ... we have to solve the fundamental problems, help them to 
build a solid foundations ... 
 
These are all the work of policy-makers. But what do one see with policy 
makers? POWER hunger. POWER mongel. GREED, DOMINATION .. Starting from the most 
powerful nation on earth. IF the US would spend less time fighiting with UN and 
EU, and give more constructive support, would it not be a better use of time 
and resources? But what do we see just from one simple example ... the Tsunami 
and earth-quake disaster in Asia ??? Or Darfur ??? Or the removal of the UN 
Refugee commissioner ... why? 
 
Digital divide is at the bottom of the list. Don't just give them fish. And 
sometime I think we do more harm than good.
 
Cindy

Tom Abeles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Andy

The mobile phone and radio, as others, here, have suggested seems to 
have been spot on. What we must also realize is that the many emerging 
features of the mobile phone, including txt msgs, gps and even pda 
capabilities are being actively deployed in the developed world for a 
number of commercial uses that, in the past, would have required a pc. 
Some applications, of course, require reading skills. But for many it is 
not needed. A colleague has been in a car where four different 
occupants were on cells in four different languages. The claim that 
phone access is not available in some remote locations is less of a 
problem than the regulatory issues within a country

As I have said elsewhere, the issues are at the institutional levels 
more than in the technology arena. It seems that eager hands/minds in 
the NGO and foundation community find it easier to embrace a village 
project and rationalize it when a combined macro effort, with the stroke 
of a pen could release more opportunity and allow those who want to work 
in the field to be much more effective.

The other issue in the DD which relates to this is where exactly to 
attack the problem. For example, working in a remote village is 
interesting: but when compared to the number of disenfranchised who are 
living on the streets of major urban areas driven out of the economc 
dearth of the remote villages to the city, then bringing the digital 
world to the urban poor seems to have leverage. Why in a remote village 
in Bangladesh when the urban poor in the streets of Dhaka mean you could 
begin right after landing.

thoughts?

tom abeles

Andy Carvin wrote:

 From the latest issue of The Economist -ac


 The real digital divide

 IT WAS an idea born in those far-off days of the internet bubble: the 
 worry that as people in the rich world embraced new computing and 
 communications technologies, people in the poor world would be left 
 stranded on the wrong side of a “digital divide”. Five years after the 
 technology bubble burst, many ideas from the time—that “eyeballs” 
 matter more than profits or that internet traffic was doubling every 
 100 days—have been sensibly shelved. But the idea of the digital 
 divide persists. On March 14th, after years of debate, the United 
 Nations will launch a “Digital Solidarity Fund” to finance projects 
 that address “the uneven distribution and use of new information and 
 communication technologies” and “enable excluded people and countries 
 to enter the new era of the information society”. Yet the debate over 
 the digital divide is founded on a myth—that plugging poor 

Re: [DDN] Regarding the cellphone users

2005-03-11 Thread Cindy Lemcke-Hoong
the reason why a mobile phone, I think it can be even land-line, is because a 
person can use a phone without having to learn how to write. Or read. Most can 
talk. 
 
Language barrier is still is the most fundamental barrier of the digital world. 
 
A phone is the interface between man and the digital communication network. 
Replace that with a fax-machine, one would find a different world even though, 
at the very basic, is the twisted-pair that connect them to the rest of the 
world. 
 
The reason why I am arguing, is because IF we think just to give them a mobile 
phone, we solve their problems. Then we are short-changing them. We LIMIT their 
potential to verbal communication only. 
 
Cindy

Teresa Lara-Meloy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,

I've occassionally forwarded the lists emails to family and friends who 
aren't on the list. 
My father, a Mexican who lives in Mexico and is an avid fighter of the 
divide, 
responded to the cellphone comment below, but he did so in Spanish. 
I'm attaching, and translating for others to read. Take it as a 
perspective outside
of academia, or the U.S.

teresa

- Forwarded by Teresa Lara-Meloy/EDC on 03/11/05 01:26 PM -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

De tu articulo
 Plenty of evidence suggests that the mobile phone is the technology with 

 the greatest impact on development. A new paper finds that mobile phones 

 raise long-term growth rates, that their impact is twice as big in 
 developing nations as in developed ones, and that an extra ten phones 
 per 100 people in a typical developing country increases GDP growth by 
 0.6 percentage points.

De mi cerebrito
Pues una de las cosas que se desprende de esto es que, este grupo de
gentes pobres y marginadas, estan haciendo un esfuerzo que no sabian
que podian hacer, para encontra el dinero y pagar el costo del
telefono y del servicio.
Ha empoderado a los nuevos o posibles usuarios a generar mas dinero
del que habian podido generar, despertando en ellos una parte de
produccion de dinero y otra de responsabilidad autonoma(usando el
telefono solo cuando tienen el dienro para pagar el tiempo aire) que
ningun gobierno ha podido generar en el siglo pasado y este.
JL

TRANSLATION:
From my brain:
One of the things that comes out of this is that this group of poor
and marginal people are making a big effort that they didn't know they
could do in order to find the money and pay the cost of the phone and
the service. 
It's empowered new and potential users to generate more money than
that which they had been able to generate, awakening in them a part of
money creation/production and an autonomous responsibility (using the
phone only when they have money to pay for airtime) that no government
has been able to generate in the last century or this one. 
___
DIGITALDIVIDE mailing list
DIGITALDIVIDE@mailman.edc.org
http://mailman.edc.org/mailman/listinfo/digitaldivide
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE 
in the body of the message.
___
DIGITALDIVIDE mailing list
DIGITALDIVIDE@mailman.edc.org
http://mailman.edc.org/mailman/listinfo/digitaldivide
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE 
in the body of the message.


Re: [DDN] Pondering a Quote from the World Bank

2005-03-05 Thread Cindy Lemcke-Hoong
This is the hear-say story about China in the 70s after Nixon (have I got the 
history bit right?) paid a visit to China ... 
 
Selling and buying began ... some of the end stories of this era ... brand new 
and huge farming equipment abandoned and rusted on rural farming grounds --- 
farmland once belongs to the 'greedy' landlords were divided into small plots 
for each individuals ... Caterpilar can only moves few steps in any directions 
on their new tiny homes ... 
 
Or the story I was told not 6 months ago by an Indian journalist of the Meena 
Girls in India. This was in the 80s ???. Money spent on developing the training 
programs and these were put on video tapes. When volunteers armed with the 
training materials arrived at small villages, not only they could not find VCR, 
some of these villages did not even have electricity. 
 
So, here I am looking at the world trying to solve digital divide for the poor 
developing world. Are we going to ship thousands of PC and install hot-spots 
for WIFI access, and then BINGO .. the local, perhaps, cannot read the language 
adequately enough to benefit from the wealth of information online? Therefore 
how can 'they' sustain their interest on 'learning' and benift from those 
wonderful information they could access to? 
 
Guessed what I saw at two village Internet Cafes in Malaysia? I was the only 
one there retrieving and sending emails. The rest of the 10 or so customers 
were young kids the age of 10 to 15 playing digital games. I do agree we can 
gain some skills playing games, but what skills can one gain from playing all 
these internet war games??? 
 
Or some NGOs in the rush of showing 'I also have a website', spent millions and 
millions on developing some ultra First world site, then discovered the end 
result qua usage from their 'target audiences' is way, way below what it should 
be ... and then they wondery why ??? 

And this is not a joke ... when I was tech instructor for Motorola 1994-6, I 
had engineers that did not know what is 'delete' on a key-board. They never 
saw, up-closed, or used a key-board in their life. The gap is not so much the 
wireless technologies, the gap is day-to-day operations.
 
Assuming eventually I can access the same information the finance minister 
could. What am I suppose to do with it? Run the country? I know it is just 
figure of speech, but it is this type of statement from person that is so 
high-up with so much advantages, such as World Bank or IMF or the US president, 
 that scares me. They are setting the goals for the Frist world, not the Third 
world. And we call them 'have visions'. 
 
Let's get down to the basic. BUILD the basic, give them the basic, teach them 
the basic, teach them how to use the tools. Don't give them bubbles. Most of 
all identify other stakeholders that can give their shares of valuable input to 
this 'digital divide' DREAMS. 
 
Cindy

Andy Carvin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just saw this quote in the report book distributed here at the Baramati
conference:

We must work towards the day when through the Internet, through distance
learning, through cellular phones and wind-up radios, the village elder or
the aspiring student will have access to the same information as the
finance minister. Communications technology gives us the tool for true
participation. This is leveling the playing field. This is real equity.

-World Bank President James Wolfensohn, Prague Annual Meetings, September
2000

I wonder if the Reuters reporter who produced the story last week saying
that the World Bank believes the digital divide is being bridged rapidly
and that we shouldn't worry about the issue so much would reconsider his
story based on this statement. Because if this situation hasn't been
realized, then the digital divide is nowhere close to being bridged. -ac



-
Andy Carvin
Program Director
EDC Center for Media  Community
acarvin @ edc . org
http://www.digitaldividenetwork.org
http://www.edwebproject.org/andy/blog/
-

___
DIGITALDIVIDE mailing list
DIGITALDIVIDE@mailman.edc.org
http://mailman.edc.org/mailman/listinfo/digitaldivide
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE 
in the body of the message.


Men know what is happening now.
The gods know the things of the future,
the full and sole possessors of all lights.
Of the future things, wise men perceive
approaching things. Their hearing

is sometimes, during serious studies,
disturbed. The mystical clamor
of approaching events reaches them.
And they heed it with reverence. While outside
on the street, the peoples hear nothing at all.

Constantine P. Cavafy (1915) 




___
DIGITALDIVIDE mailing list
DIGITALDIVIDE@mailman.edc.org
http://mailman.edc.org/mailman/listinfo/digitaldivide
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL 

Re: [DDN] [Fwd: [Politech] World Bank report questions size of digital divide [econ]]

2005-03-04 Thread Cindy Lemcke-Hoong
I never seems to be able to post to DDN ... I am going to give it one more try 
...
 
reading the analysis by Taran and others, I have to agree there are TOO MANY 
DIVIDES and not just digital. 
 
Read the email from Declan, one can just understand why this world has so many 
divides. When World Bank stated the digital divide is 'closer', what do they 
mean? Does it mean there are more computers sold and bought? By by whom? 
 
I have someone in Indonesia complained to me that 100 PC sent to the country 
for the Tsunami efforts just VANISHED' without a trace. Now even if there is 
no all the 'divides' there is still one big divide -- those with POWER to take 
away the 100 PC, and those literally standing on the other side of the import 
clearance fence. And of course the Indonesian governmnet is putting 
extrodinatry import tax on PC and any so called 'digital equipments'. Including 
when the goods are for NGOs purposes (not sure if it is resolved now) ... 
 
The problem with most of the members of DDN (that I happened to read here) is 
they MIGHT have the good fortune to be born in the USA or other countries that 
are, as Declan suggested, that have all the good governance etc. THerefore it 
is difficult for them to really understand what it means to be cut-off because 
of religion, race, nationalities, citizenships, migrant status etc. etc. etc. 
AND most of all language ... and of course MONEY ... 100 USD per month for some 
is a sneeze. But even in a country such as Malaysia which is a modern and very 
well developed if compared to some countries in Africa for example, with 100 
local money I can have very nice meals for 10 persons or more ... 
 
THerefore all these talks about digital divide are for people who HAS digital 
avilable to them because they do not face many of the 'divides' mentioned above 
... so how can we understand what the needs of these people? Furthermore, even 
if we build a teleceter for them and they can access to the rest of the world 
and get a PhD in something ... what good would that be for someone in a fishing 
village? It would be just like building an ultra modern hospital without 
providing ultra modern doctors and nurses ... My question during one of EU NGOs 
workshop --- providing scholarship to educate people from Africa and other 
countries is noble, BUT why give them the education they cannot use back in 
their own countries? 
 
And do not forget ... those of use who read and write here and mostly highly 
educated. We have the means that's why we are here.
 
A agreed with Taran totally that there is just so many 'divides' I just try to 
do what I can manage to help further things along ... I no longer belive in 
waiting for a big 'bang' miracles ... 
Since I am not sure if this posting would have problems, I will stop here. 

Chuck Sherwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To All: This is the kind of knownothing analysis that is being 
generated by the World Bank report. Declan's listserv is read by many 
thought leaders and his analysis will contribute to the general 
misunderstanding and misinformation about the Digital Divide. Your 
comments should be addressed to him directly at the Politech email address.

Chuck Sherwood

 Original Message 
Subject: [Politech] World Bank report questions size of digital 
divide [econ]
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 01:04:11 -0500
From: Declan McCullagh 
To: politech@politechbot.com



I've never completely understood the term digital divide. Perhaps it's 
mere parochialism: I live in Washington, DC and have access to DSL and 
cable modem connections and can purchase a T1 line.

But I don't think so -- the real problem is the term digital divide 
itself. Any such divide is necessarily a subset of an economic divide. 
I have access to technological resources because the U.S. and its peer 
nations have stable governments, functioning court systems, 
not-entirely-insane tax rates, functioning bank systems, and pay some 
attention to property rights. That encourages investment, both domestic 
and foreign, and fosters an environment that lets a middle class grow 
and communications providers prosper.

What I just described is not the situation in many parts of the world, 
especially Africa and perhaps portions of Latin America, that are the 
most vocal in demanding Digital Solidarity Funds paid for by tax 
dollars in countries that have made more sane economic choices. (This is 
not an accident of geography. In the early 1900s, Argentina was an 
economic powerhouse. Now its citizens are understandably leery of bank 
accounts and credit cards, thanks to past government thievery.)

A recent UPI column describes the problems confronting Latin America 
today, thanks in large part to politicans' poor economic choices:
http://www.washtimes.com/upi-breaking/20050211-033722-6932r.htm

In other words, it's a bit silly to talk about the digital divide 
without also addressing the underlying problems of broken court systems, 
military rule,