[tdf-discuss] Re: missing debs on ppa
Hi, On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 06:54:33 -0600 Sonic4Spuds sonic4sp...@gmail.com wrote: Just checked synaptic and all of the files in the ppa are listed as version 3.3.0.0 rc4. Also made sure that it is getting the latest list from the ppa. There are natty versions for 3.3.1. Beware of partial updates however: Currently there is amd64 build for 3.3.1~rc2-1ubuntu2 fnished in the ppa, while the i386 build (which also builds the arch independant stuff like libreoffice-java-common) is not finished yet. Backports for maverick will be added later. The ppa name is listed as lp-ppa-libreoffice/maverick if there is a different ppa that is official and the one I have is not then let me know. just to clarify: there is nothing official about a ppa by definition. If it is official, it is in the main repository. Best Regards, Bjoern -- https://launchpad.net/~bjoern-michaelsen -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: missing debs on ppa
Dear Bjoern, I think a lot of people though it was an official LibreOffice PPA for Ubuntu, not an official Canonical package: http://www.silicongadget.com/guides/software-guides/office-suites/install-libreoffice-on-ubuntu-using-the-official-repository/2097/ http://www.silicongadget.com/guides/software-guides/office-suites/install-libreoffice-on-ubuntu-using-the-official-repository/2097/ Cheers! Jaime On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 14:16, Bjoern Michaelsen bjoern.michael...@canonical.com wrote: Hi, On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 06:54:33 -0600 Sonic4Spuds sonic4sp...@gmail.com wrote: Just checked synaptic and all of the files in the ppa are listed as version 3.3.0.0 rc4. Also made sure that it is getting the latest list from the ppa. There are natty versions for 3.3.1. Beware of partial updates however: Currently there is amd64 build for 3.3.1~rc2-1ubuntu2 fnished in the ppa, while the i386 build (which also builds the arch independant stuff like libreoffice-java-common) is not finished yet. Backports for maverick will be added later. The ppa name is listed as lp-ppa-libreoffice/maverick if there is a different ppa that is official and the one I have is not then let me know. just to clarify: there is nothing official about a ppa by definition. If it is official, it is in the main repository. Best Regards, Bjoern -- https://launchpad.net/~bjoern-michaelsen -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity *** -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
[tdf-discuss] Re: missing debs on ppa
Hi Jaime, Hi all, On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 14:33:23 +0100 Jaime R. Garza gar...@gmail.com wrote: I think a lot of people though it was an official LibreOffice PPA for Ubuntu, not an official Canonical package: http://www.silicongadget.com/guides/software-guides/office-suites/install-libreoffice-on-ubuntu-using-the-official-repository/2097/ http://www.silicongadget.com/guides/software-guides/office-suites/install-libreoffice-on-ubuntu-using-the-official-repository/2097/ well, the ppa is different from most other ppas as it is the ppa of the libreoffice packaging team at Ubuntu. That is: it is the stuff we as a team intend to put in the main repositories in the end. However: As https://launchpad.net/~libreoffice/+archive/ppa itself describes it best: LibreOffice test builds and backports. Thats pretty clear. Please do not hold me accountable for any journalist calling it different to make a good headline. Yes, Canonical and Ubuntu will support Libreoffice, but we will not race out a release to the main repositories, just so that we can claim to be first(*). Best Regards, Bjoern (*) If you dont care about the final stabilization fixes, you could build an rc1 yourself and you will have your (almost) release a week earlier. But if you wait for the final for a week, you should also wait another day or two for the distribution adjustments. -- https://launchpad.net/~bjoern-michaelsen -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: missing debs on ppa
Dear Bjoern, I don't think anyone is trying to make you responsible for anything, ;-) We just kindly ask when would the 3.3.1 version be available in the PPA? Cheers! Jaime On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 15:36, Bjoern Michaelsen bjoern.michael...@canonical.com wrote: Hi Jaime, Hi all, On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 14:33:23 +0100 Jaime R. Garza gar...@gmail.com wrote: I think a lot of people though it was an official LibreOffice PPA for Ubuntu, not an official Canonical package: http://www.silicongadget.com/guides/software-guides/office-suites/install-libreoffice-on-ubuntu-using-the-official-repository/2097/ http://www.silicongadget.com/guides/software-guides/office-suites/install-libreoffice-on-ubuntu-using-the-official-repository/2097/ well, the ppa is different from most other ppas as it is the ppa of the libreoffice packaging team at Ubuntu. That is: it is the stuff we as a team intend to put in the main repositories in the end. However: As https://launchpad.net/~libreoffice/+archive/ppa itself describes it best: LibreOffice test builds and backports. Thats pretty clear. Please do not hold me accountable for any journalist calling it different to make a good headline. Yes, Canonical and Ubuntu will support Libreoffice, but we will not race out a release to the main repositories, just so that we can claim to be first(*). Best Regards, Bjoern (*) If you dont care about the final stabilization fixes, you could build an rc1 yourself and you will have your (almost) release a week earlier. But if you wait for the final for a week, you should also wait another day or two for the distribution adjustments. -- https://launchpad.net/~bjoern-michaelsen -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity *** -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
