Re: [docbook-apps] Website: Problem using olinks across websites
Following Bob's lead, I've tried to generate a website.database.xml that does not contain the offending document elements - with no luck. To simplify things, I built the example website that comes with the website 2.6 distribution, using the layout and build.xml ant file provided. Other than pointing at local resources, I only modified it by adding the last argument to this target: ==
Re: [docbook-apps] [SOT] CALS table model DTD - where to download?
My apologies, I was completely misled by the content model definitions in the DTD file 'calstblx.dtd' distributed with DocBook, thinking it is a modified version already. It now appears from the comments in that file that it actually *IS* the file I was looking for. Sorry for the noise. Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[docbook-apps] [SOT] CALS table model DTD - where to download?
Hello, where did the DocBook developers get the basic CALS DTD file from before they modified its defined entities for use within the DocBook DTD? It seems like I just cannot find that "original" DTD file anywhere on the web - either it's already the DocBook-modified version, or I end up on OASIS's pages where they talk about it all over the place and are having HTML-ified and annotated versions of what looks like the original DTD file, but there's no place where I can download that pure file in itself! If anyone has a link to it, that would be highly appreciated. Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[docbook-apps] table.cell.border.color not applied in HTML output
table.cell.border.color doesn't applied in HTML output. However, it is displaying the expected color in FO. The parameter exists in HTML as it is showing here http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/xsl/current/doc/html/table.cell.border.color.html. Here is my common customization layer: http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform"; version="1.0"> orange Does someone know what I did wrong? thx! Xuan. __ Instant Messaging, free SMS, sharing photos and more... Try the new Yahoo! Canada Messenger at http://ca.beta.messenger.yahoo.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [docbook-apps] ant and db5, xinclude and fo output
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 2:20 PM, Johnson, Eric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > one to resolve the xincludes then one to process the content. Since we are > also using profiling that resulted in a three stage process (5 if we tagged > on PDF processing). > It seemed easier and faster to use Saxon from the command. Separate passes certainly makes it a lot easier to figure out what is wrong if something breaks in the publishing chain... S - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [docbook-apps] ant and db5, xinclude and fo output
When I was setting up our Ant based tool chain I could not find a way to get
the Ant task to support xinclude processing without doing two passes:
one to resolve the xincludes then one to process the content. Since we are also
using profiling that resulted in a three stage process (5 if we tagged on PDF
processing).
It seemed easier and faster to use Saxon from the command.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu 4/10/2008 8:46 AM
To: docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [docbook-apps] ant and db5, xinclude and fo output
On Thu, Apr 10 2008 11:36:06 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> My latest foray into ant:
...
>
> Generate the fo output
>fork="yes"
> dir="${in.dir}"
> failonerror="true">
>
>line="-Dorg.apache.xerces.xni.parser.XMLParserConfiguration=org.apache.xerces.parsers.XIncludeParserConfiguration"/>
>line="-Djavax.xml.parsers.DocumentBuilderFactory=org.apache.xerces.jaxp.DocumentBuilderFactoryImpl"/>
>line="-Djavax.xml.parsers.SAXParserFactory=org.apache.xerces.jaxp.SAXParserFactoryImpl"/>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
The Ant manual [1] recommends rather than . Doing so needs more elements, but it's safer to use.
Why are you using the task rather than the task? IMO,
using the task makes using XML catalogs with Ant much easier.
You could also make a macro for the transformation so you wouldn't need
to repeat everything just to change three filenames.
...
> It might be nicer to use xmllint to expand the includes and validate,
> but I haven't figured out how to get ant to do that.
[2].
Regards,
Tony Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Director W3C XSL FO SG Invited Expert
Menteith Consulting Ltd
XML, XSL and XSLT consulting, programming and training
Registered Office: 13 Kelly's Bay Beach, Skerries, Co. Dublin, Ireland
Registered in Ireland - No. 428599 http://www.menteithconsulting.com
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
xmlroff XSL Formatter http://xmlroff.org
xslide Emacs mode http://www.menteith.com/wiki/xslide
Unicode: A Primer urn:isbn:0-7645-4625-2
[1] http://ant.apache.org/manual/using.html#arg
[2] http://ant.apache.org/manual/CoreTasks/exec.html
I don't know why it's showing as "beta" since it was in earlier
versions of Ant than the Ant 1.7 currently documented at this URL.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [docbook-apps] ant and db5, xinclude and fo output
On Thu, Apr 10 2008 11:36:06 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> My latest foray into ant:
...
>
> Generate the fo output
>fork="yes"
> dir="${in.dir}"
> failonerror="true">
>
>line="-Dorg.apache.xerces.xni.parser.XMLParserConfiguration=org.apache.xerces.parsers.XIncludeParserConfiguration"/>
>line="-Djavax.xml.parsers.DocumentBuilderFactory=org.apache.xerces.jaxp.DocumentBuilderFactoryImpl"/>
>line="-Djavax.xml.parsers.SAXParserFactory=org.apache.xerces.jaxp.SAXParserFactoryImpl"/>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
The Ant manual [1] recommends rather than . Doing so needs more elements, but it's safer to use.
Why are you using the task rather than the task? IMO,
using the task makes using XML catalogs with Ant much easier.
You could also make a macro for the transformation so you wouldn't need
to repeat everything just to change three filenames.
...
> It might be nicer to use xmllint to expand the includes and validate,
> but I haven't figured out how to get ant to do that.
[2].
Regards,
Tony Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Director W3C XSL FO SG Invited Expert
Menteith Consulting Ltd
XML, XSL and XSLT consulting, programming and training
Registered Office: 13 Kelly's Bay Beach, Skerries, Co. Dublin, Ireland
Registered in Ireland - No. 428599 http://www.menteithconsulting.com
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
xmlroff XSL Formatter http://xmlroff.org
xslide Emacs mode http://www.menteith.com/wiki/xslide
Unicode: A Primer urn:isbn:0-7645-4625-2
[1] http://ant.apache.org/manual/using.html#arg
[2] http://ant.apache.org/manual/CoreTasks/exec.html
I don't know why it's showing as "beta" since it was in earlier
versions of Ant than the Ant 1.7 currently documented at this URL.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[docbook-apps] ant and db5, xinclude and fo output
My latest foray into ant:
Xinclude processing, fo output using xep.
line="-Dorg.apache.xerces.xni.parser.XMLParserConfiguration=org.apache.xerces.parsers.XIncludeParserConfiguration"/>
line="-Djavax.xml.parsers.DocumentBuilderFactory=org.apache.xerces.jaxp.DocumentBuilderFactoryImpl"/>
line="-Djavax.xml.parsers.SAXParserFactory=org.apache.xerces.jaxp.SAXParserFactoryImpl"/>
Finished at ${fintim}
And for the fo, both stages:
Generate the fo output
line="-Dorg.apache.xerces.xni.parser.XMLParserConfiguration=org.apache.xerces.parsers.XIncludeParserConfiguration"/>
line="-Djavax.xml.parsers.DocumentBuilderFactory=org.apache.xerces.jaxp.DocumentBuilderFactoryImpl"/>
line="-Djavax.xml.parsers.SAXParserFactory=org.apache.xerces.jaxp.SAXParserFactoryImpl"/>
Generate the pdf in ${out.fo.dir}
cp is ${fo.processor.class}
Finished on ${fintim}
It might be nicer to use xmllint to expand the includes and validate,
but I haven't figured out how to get ant to do that.
Real nasty if (as I did) you have
book
chapter
chapter
section
where the chapters (and the section) were xincluded
Ouch :-) I'd forgotten to wrap the section in a chapter.
Docbook processes it and the fo processor blows up if it does a
validation stage, as xep does.
(Thanks RenderX)
HTH
regards
--
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
